SSC/FreeEnergy/PolytropesEmbedded/Pt2
Free Energy of Embedded Polytropes[edit]
Part I: Synopsis |
Part II: Truncated Polytropes |
Part III: Free-Energy of Bipolytropes |
||
IIIA: Focus on (5, 1) Bipolytropes |
IIIB: Focus on (0, 0) Bipolytropes |
IIIC: Overview |
||
Free-Energy of Truncated Polytropes[edit]
In this case, the Gibbs-like free energy is given by the sum of three separate energies,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where the constants,
|
|
and |
|
and, as derived elsewhere,
|
Structural Form Factors for Pressure-Truncated Polytropes |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||
|
As we have shown separately, for the singular case of ,
where, |
In general, then, the warped free-energy surface drapes across a four-dimensional parameter "plane" such that,
|
|
|
|
In order to effectively visualize the structure of this free-energy surface, we will reduce the parameter space from four to two, in two separate ways: First, we will hold constant the parameter pair, ; giving a nod to Kimura's (1981b) nomenclature, we will refer to the resulting function, , as a "Case M" free-energy surface because the mass is being held constant. Second, we will hold constant the parameter pair, , and examine the resulting "Case P" free-energy surface, .
Virial Equilibrium and Dynamical Stability[edit]
The first (partial) derivative of with respect to is,
|
|
|
|
and the second (partial) derivative is,
|
|
|
|
The virial equilibrium radius is identified by setting the first derivative to zero. This means that,
|
|
|
|
This expression can be usefully rewritten in the following forms:
| Virial Equilibrium Condition | ||||
| Case 1: |
|
|||
| Case 2: |
|
|||
| Case 3: |
|
|||
Dynamical stability is determined by the sign of the second derivative expression evaluated at the equilibrium radius; setting the second derivative to zero identifies the transition from stable to unstable configurations. The criterion is,
|
|
|
|
Case 1 Stability Criterion[edit]
Using the "Case 1" virial expression to define the equilibrium radius means that the stability criterion is,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case 2 Stability Criterion[edit]
Using the "Case 2" virial expression to define the equilibrium radius means that the stability criterion is,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case 3 Stability Criterion[edit]
Using the "Case 3" virial expression to define the equilibrium radius means that the stability criterion is,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case M[edit]
Now, in our discussion of "Case M" sequence analyses, the configuration's radius is normalized to,
|
|
|
|
Our "Case 3" stability criterion directly relates. We conclude that the transition from stability to dynamical instability occurs when,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also in the "Case M" discussions, the external pressure is normalized to,
|
|
|
|
If we raise the "Case 1" stability criterion expression to the power, then divide it by the "Case 3" stability criterion expression raised to the fourth power, we find,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case P[edit]
Flipping around this expression for , we also can write,
|
|
|
|
Now, in our "Case P" discussions we normalized the mass to
|
|
|
|
Hence, we have,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where the constants,
|
|
and |
|
So we can furthermore conclude that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our expression for can also be combined with the "Case 2 stability criterion" to eliminate the mass entirely, giving,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, recognizing that in our "Case P" discussions we normalized the radius to
|
|
|
|
we have,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case M Free-Energy Surface[edit]
It is useful to rewrite the free-energy function in terms of dimensionless parameters. Here we need to pick normalizations for energy, radius, and pressure that are expressed in terms of the gravitational constant, , and the two fixed parameters, and . We have chosen to use,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
which, as is detailed in an accompanying discussion, are similar but not identical to the normalizations used by Horedt (1970) and by Whitworth (1981). The self-consistent energy normalization is,
|
|
|
|
As we have demonstrated elsewhere, after implementing these normalizations, the expression that describes the "Case M" free-energy surface is,
Given the polytropic index, , we expect to obtain a different "Case M" free-energy surface for each choice of the dimensionless truncation radius, ; this choice will imply corresponding values for and and, hence also, corresponding (constant) values of the coefficients, and .
Case P Free-Energy Surface[edit]
Again, it is useful to rewrite the free-energy function in terms of dimensionless parameters. But here we need to pick normalizations for energy, radius, and mass that are expressed in terms of the gravitational constant, , and the two fixed parameters, and . As is detailed in an accompanying discussion, we have chosen to use the normalizations defined by Stahler (1983), namely,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The self-consistent energy normalization is,
|
|
|
|
After implementing these normalizations — see our accompanying analysis for details — the expression that describes the "Case P" free-energy surface is,
|
|
|
|
Given the polytropic index, , we expect to obtain a different "Case P" free-energy surface for each choice of the dimensionless truncation radius, ; this choice will imply corresponding values for and and, hence also, corresponding (constant) values of the coefficients, and .
Summary[edit]
| DFB Equilibrium | Onset of Dynamical Instability | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case M: |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| Case P: |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
In all four cases, the expression on right intersects (is equal to) the expression on the left when the following condition applies:
|
||||||||||
If (for ) we adopt the shorthand notation,
|
|
|
|
|
and |
||
|
|
|
|
then the critical condition becomes,
|
|
|
|
and at the critical state, the expressions for the structural form-factors become,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence (1),
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q.E.D.
And (2),
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q.E.D.
And (3),
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q.E.D.
And (4),
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q.E.D.
See Also[edit]
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |