SSC/FreeEnergy/PolytropesEmbedded/Pt2

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Free Energy of Embedded Polytropes[edit]


Part I:   Synopsis
 

Part II:  Truncated Polytropes
 

Part III:  Free-Energy of Bipolytropes
 

IIIA:  Focus on (5, 1) Bipolytropes
 

IIIB:  Focus on (0, 0) Bipolytropes
 

IIIC:  Overview
 


Free-Energy of Truncated Polytropes[edit]

In this case, the Gibbs-like free energy is given by the sum of three separate energies,

𝔊

=

Wgrav+𝔖therm+PeV

 

=

−3𝒜[GM2R]+nℬ[KM(n+1)/nR3/n]+4π3⋅PeR3,

where the constants,

𝒜≡15⋅𝔣~W𝔣~M2

      and     

ℬ≡(4π3)−1/n𝔣~A𝔣~M(n+1)/n,

and, as derived elsewhere,

Structural Form Factors for Pressure-Truncated Polytropes (n≠5)

𝔣~M

=

(−3θ~'ξ~)

𝔣~W

=

3⋅5(5−n)ξ~2[θ~n+1+3(θ~')2−𝔣~Mθ~]

𝔣~A

=

1(5−n){6θ~n+1+(n+1)[3(θ~')2−𝔣~Mθ~]}

As we have shown separately, for the singular case of n=5,

𝔣M

=

(1+ℓ2)−3/2

𝔣W

=

524⋅ℓ−5[ℓ(ℓ4−83ℓ2−1)(1+ℓ2)−3+tan−1(ℓ)]

𝔣A

=

323ℓ−3[tan−1(ℓ)+ℓ(ℓ2−1)(1+ℓ2)−2]

where, ℓ≡ξ~/3


In general, then, the warped free-energy surface drapes across a four-dimensional parameter "plane" such that,

𝔊

=

𝔊(R,K,M,Pe).

In order to effectively visualize the structure of this free-energy surface, we will reduce the parameter space from four to two, in two separate ways: First, we will hold constant the parameter pair, (K,M); giving a nod to Kimura's (1981b) nomenclature, we will refer to the resulting function, 𝔊K,M(R,Pe), as a "Case M" free-energy surface because the mass is being held constant. Second, we will hold constant the parameter pair, (K,Pe), and examine the resulting "Case P" free-energy surface, 𝔊K,Pe(R,M).

Virial Equilibrium and Dynamical Stability[edit]

The first (partial) derivative of 𝔊 with respect to R is,

∂𝔊∂R

=

1R[3𝒜GM2R−1−3ℬKM(n+1)/nR−3/n+4πPeR3];

and the second (partial) derivative is,

∂2𝔊∂R2

=

1R2[−6𝒜GM2R−1+(n+3n)3ℬKM(n+1)/nR−3/n+8πPeR3].

The virial equilibrium radius is identified by setting the first derivative to zero. This means that,

3ℬKM(n+1)/nReq−3/n

=

3𝒜GM2Req−1+4πPeReq3.

This expression can be usefully rewritten in the following forms:

Virial Equilibrium Condition
Case 1:

3(n+3)ℬKM(n+1)/nReq−3/n

=

3(n+3)𝒜GM2Req−1+4π(n+3)PeReq3

Case 2:

−6n𝒜GM2Req−1

=

8πnPeReq3−6nℬKM(n+1)/nReq−3/n

Case 3:

8πnPeReq3

=

6nℬKM(n+1)/nReq−3/n−6n𝒜GM2Req−1

Dynamical stability is determined by the sign of the second derivative expression evaluated at the equilibrium radius; setting the second derivative to zero identifies the transition from stable to unstable configurations. The criterion is,

0

=

[−6n𝒜GM2R−1+3(n+3)ℬKM(n+1)/nR−3/n+8πnPeR3]Req

Case 1 Stability Criterion[edit]

Using the "Case 1" virial expression to define the equilibrium radius means that the stability criterion is,

0

=

−6n𝒜GM2Req−1+3(n+3)𝒜GM2Req−1+4π(n+3)PeReq3+8πnPeReq3

 

=

𝒜GM2Req−1[3(n+3)−6n]+4πPeReq3[(n+3)+2n]

⇒4πPeReq3[3(n+1)]

=

𝒜GM2Req−1[3(n−3)]

⇒4πPeReq4(n+1)

=

𝒜GM2(n−3)

Case 2 Stability Criterion[edit]

Using the "Case 2" virial expression to define the equilibrium radius means that the stability criterion is,

0

=

8πnPeReq3−6nℬKM(n+1)/nReq−3/n+3(n+3)ℬKM(n+1)/nReq−3/n+8πnPeReq3

 

=

16πnPeReq3−[3(n−3)]ℬKM(n+1)/nReq−3/n

⇒16πnPeReq3

=

[3(n−3)]ℬKM(n+1)/nReq−3/n

⇒16πnPeReq3(n+1)/n

=

[3(n−3)]ℬKM(n+1)/n

Case 3 Stability Criterion[edit]

Using the "Case 3" virial expression to define the equilibrium radius means that the stability criterion is,

0

=

−6n𝒜GM2Req−1+3(n+3)ℬKM(n+1)/nReq−3/n+6nℬKM(n+1)/nReq−3/n−6n𝒜GM2Req−1

 

=

−12n𝒜GM2Req−1+[6n+3(n+3)]ℬKM(n+1)/nReq−3/n

⇒9(n+1)ℬKM(n+1)/nReq−3/n

=

12n𝒜GM2Req−1

⇒Reqn−3

=

[4n𝒜3(n+1)ℬ]n(GK)nMn−1

Case M[edit]

Now, in our discussion of "Case M" sequence analyses, the configuration's radius is normalized to,

Rnorm

≡

[GnK−nMn−1]1/(n−3).

Our "Case 3" stability criterion directly relates. We conclude that the transition from stability to dynamical instability occurs when,

[ReqRnorm]critn−3

=

[4n𝒜3(n+1)ℬ]n

⇒[ReqRnorm]crit(n−3)/n

=

4n15(n+1)(4π3)1/n⋅𝔣~W𝔣~A𝔣~M(n−1)/n

Also in the "Case M" discussions, the external pressure is normalized to,

Pnorm

≡

[G−3(n+1)K4nM−2(n+1)]1/(n−3).

If we raise the "Case 1" stability criterion expression to the (n−3) power, then divide it by the "Case 3" stability criterion expression raised to the fourth power, we find,

⇒[Pe]critn−3

=

[𝒜GM2(n−3)4π(n+1)]n−3{[4n𝒜3(n+1)ℬ]n(GK)nMn−1}−4

 

=

[𝒜(n−3)4π(n+1)]n−3Gn−3M2(n−3)[3(n+1)ℬ4n𝒜]4n(KG)4nM4(1−n)

 

=

[(n−3)4π(n+1)]n−3[3(n+1)4n]4n𝒜−3(n+1)ℬ4nK4nM−2(n+1)G−3(n+1)

⇒[PePnorm]critn−3

=

[(n−3)4π(n+1)]n−3[3(n+1)4n]4n𝒜−3(n+1)ℬ4n

 

=

[(n−3)4π(n+1)]n−3[3(n+1)4n]4n[5𝔣~M2𝔣~W]3(n+1)(34π)4[𝔣~A𝔣~M(n+1)/n]4n

 

=

(34π)4[(n−3)4π(n+1)]n−3[3(n+1)4n]4n[5𝔣~W]3(n+1)𝔣~M2(n+1)𝔣~A4n

Case P[edit]

Flipping around this expression for [Pe]crit, we also can write,

[M]crit2(n+1)

=

[(n−3)4π(n+1)]n−3[3(n+1)4n]4n𝒜−3(n+1)ℬ4nK4nG−3(n+1)Pe3−n.

Now, in our "Case P" discussions we normalized the mass to

MSWS

≡

(n+1n)3/2G−3/2K2n/(n+1)Pe(3−n)/[2(n+1)].

Hence, we have,

[MMSWS]crit2(n+1)

=

[(n−3)4π(n+1)]n−3[3(n+1)4n]4n𝒜−3(n+1)ℬ4n(n+1n)−3(n+1)

 

=

[(n−3)4πn]n−3(34)4n𝒜−3(n+1)ℬ4n,

where the constants,

𝒜≡15⋅𝔣~W𝔣~M2

      and     

ℬ≡(4π3)−1/n𝔣~A𝔣~M(n+1)/n.

So we can furthermore conclude that,

[MMSWS]crit2(n+1)

=

[(n−3)4πn]n−3(34)4n{15⋅𝔣~W𝔣~M2}−3(n+1){(4π3)−1/n𝔣~A𝔣~M(n+1)/n}4n

 

=

(34π)4[(n−3)4πn]n−3(3𝔣~A4)4n[53𝔣~M2𝔣~W3](n+1).


Our expression for [M]crit2(n+1) can also be combined with the "Case 2 stability criterion" to eliminate the mass entirely, giving,

{16πnPeReq3(n+1)/n}2n

=

{[3(n−3)]ℬK}2n[(n−3)4π(n+1)]n−3[3(n+1)4n]4n𝒜−3(n+1)ℬ4nK4nG−3(n+1)Pe3−n

⇒Req6(n+1)

=

[3(n−3)16πn]2n[(n−3)4π(n+1)]n−3[3(n+1)4n]4n𝒜−3(n+1)ℬ6nK6nG−3(n+1)Pe3(1−n)

⇒Req2(n+1)

=

{[(n−3)4πn]2n[(n−3)4πn]n−3[(n+1)n]4n+(3−n)(34)6n}1/3𝒜−(n+1)ℬ2nK2nG−(n+1)Pe(1−n)

 

=

[(n−3)4πn](n−1)[(n+1)n](n+1)(34)2n𝒜−(n+1)ℬ2nK2nG−(n+1)Pe(1−n).

Finally, recognizing that in our "Case P" discussions we normalized the radius to

RSWS

≡

(n+1n)1/2G−1/2Kn/(n+1)Pe(1−n)/[2(n+1)],

we have,

[Req]crit2(n+1)

=

[(n−3)4πn](n−1)(n+1n)(n+1)(34)2n𝒜−(n+1)ℬ2n{RSWS(n+1n)−1/2}2(n+1)

⇒[ReqRSWS]crit2(n+1)

=

[(n−3)4πn](n−1)(34)2n𝒜−(n+1)ℬ2n

 

=

[nn−3](1−n)(4π)1−n(34)2n[15⋅𝔣~W𝔣~M2]−(n+1)[(4π3)−1/n𝔣~A𝔣~M(n+1)/n]2n

 

=

[nn−3](1−n)(4π)1−n−232n+24−2n[5𝔣~M2𝔣~W](n+1)[𝔣~A2n𝔣~M2(n+1)]

 

=

[nn−3](1−n)[32⋅54π𝔣~W](n+1)[𝔣~A4]2n.

Case M Free-Energy Surface[edit]

It is useful to rewrite the free-energy function in terms of dimensionless parameters. Here we need to pick normalizations for energy, radius, and pressure that are expressed in terms of the gravitational constant, G, and the two fixed parameters, K and M. We have chosen to use,

Rnorm

≡

[(GK)nMtotn−1]1/(n−3),

Pnorm

≡

[K4nG3(n+1)Mtot2(n+1)]1/(n−3),

which, as is detailed in an accompanying discussion, are similar but not identical to the normalizations used by Horedt (1970) and by Whitworth (1981). The self-consistent energy normalization is,

Enorm

≡

PnormRnorm3.

As we have demonstrated elsewhere, after implementing these normalizations, the expression that describes the "Case M" free-energy surface is,

𝔊K,M*≡𝔊K,MEnorm=−3𝒜(RRnorm)−1+nℬ(RRnorm)−3/n+(4π3)PePnorm(RRnorm)3,

Given the polytropic index, n, we expect to obtain a different "Case M" free-energy surface for each choice of the dimensionless truncation radius, ξ~; this choice will imply corresponding values for θ~ and θ~' and, hence also, corresponding (constant) values of the coefficients, 𝒜 and ℬ.


Case P Free-Energy Surface[edit]

Again, it is useful to rewrite the free-energy function in terms of dimensionless parameters. But here we need to pick normalizations for energy, radius, and mass that are expressed in terms of the gravitational constant, G, and the two fixed parameters, K and Pe. As is detailed in an accompanying discussion, we have chosen to use the normalizations defined by Stahler (1983), namely,

RSWS

≡

(n+1nG)1/2Kn/(n+1)Pe(1−n)/[2(n+1)],

MSWS

≡

(n+1nG)3/2K2n/(n+1)Pe(3−n)/[2(n+1)].

The self-consistent energy normalization is,

ESWS≡(nn+1)GMSWS2RSWS

=

(n+1n)3/2G−3/2K3n/(n+1)Pe(5−n)/[2(n+1)].

After implementing these normalizations — see our accompanying analysis for details — the expression that describes the "Case P" free-energy surface is,

𝔊K,Pe*≡𝔊K,PeESWS

=

−3𝒜(n+1n)(MMSWS)2(RRSWS)−1+nℬ(MMSWS)(n+1)/n(RRSWS)−3/n+4π3⋅(RRSWS)3.

Given the polytropic index, n, we expect to obtain a different "Case P" free-energy surface for each choice of the dimensionless truncation radius, ξ~; this choice will imply corresponding values for θ~ and θ~' and, hence also, corresponding (constant) values of the coefficients, 𝒜 and ℬ.

Summary[edit]

  DFB Equilibrium Onset of Dynamical Instability
Case M:

[ReqRnorm]n−3

=

[4π(n+1)n]ξ~(n−3)(−ξ~2θ'~)(1−n)

[ReqRnorm]critn−3

=

[4n15(n+1)]n(4π3)𝔣~Wn𝔣~An𝔣~M(n−1)

[PePnorm]n−3

=

[(n+1)34π](n+1)θ~(n+1)(n−3)(−ξ~2θ'~)2(n+1)

[PePnorm]critn−3

=

(34π)4[(n−3)4πn]n−3(n+1n)3(n+1)[53𝔣~M2𝔣~W3]n+1(3𝔣~A4)4n

Case P:

[ReqRSWS]2

=

(n4π)ξ~2θ~n−1

[ReqRSWS]crit2

=

[32⋅54π𝔣~W][n−3n](n−1)/(n+1)[𝔣~A4]2n/(n+1)

[MtotMSWS]2

=

(n34π)θ~n−3(−ξ~2θ'~)2

[MtotMSWS]crit2

=

[53𝔣~M2𝔣~W3](34π)4/(n+1)[(n−3)4πn](n−3)/(n+1)(3𝔣~A4)4n/(n+1)

In all four cases, the expression on right intersects (is equal to) the expression on the left when the following condition applies:

For n≠5:      

2(9−2n)θ~n+1

=

3(n−3)[(−θ~')2−(−θ~θ~'ξ~)];

For n=5:      

[24⋅53]ℓ3

=

(1+ℓ2)3tan−1ℓ+ℓ(ℓ4−1).


If (for n≠5) we adopt the shorthand notation,

Υ

≡

[3(−θ~')2−𝔣~Mθ~]=3[(−θ~')2−(−θ~θ~'ξ~)],

and

τ

≡

θ~n+1,

then the critical condition becomes,

(n−3)Υ

=

2(9−2n)τ,

and at the critical state, the expressions for the structural form-factors become,

𝔣~A

=

1(5−n)[6τ+(n+1)Υ]

 

=

1(5−n){6+(n+1)[2(9−2n)n−3]}τ

 

=

1(5−n)[6(n−3)+2(9−2n)(n+1)n−3]τ

 

=

1(5−n)[4n(5−n)n−3]τ

 

=

4nτ(n−3);

𝔣~W

=

3⋅5(5−n)ξ~2[τ+Υ]

 

=

3⋅5(5−n)ξ~2{1+[2(9−2n)n−3]}τ

 

=

3⋅5(5−n)ξ~2[3(5−n)n−3]τ

 

=

32⋅5τ(n−3)ξ~2

⇒53𝔣~M2𝔣~W3

=

[(n−3)ξ~232τ]3(−3θ~'ξ~)2=32[(n−3)ξ~232τ]3(−ξ~2θ~'ξ~3)2

 

=

[(n−3)334τ3](−ξ~2θ~')2.

Hence (1),

[ReqRnorm]critn−3

=

[4π(n+1)n][4n15]n(13)[32⋅54nξ~2]n𝔣~M1−n

 

=

[4π(n+1)n][1ξ~2n](−ξ~2θ~'ξ~3)1−n

 

=

[4π(n+1)n]ξ~n−3(−ξ~2θ~')1−n

Q.E.D.


And (2),

[PePnorm]critn−3

=

(34π)4[(n−3)4πn]n−3(n+1n)3(n+1)[53𝔣~M2𝔣~W3]n+1(3𝔣~A4)4n

 

=

34(4π)−(n+1)(n−3n)n−3(n+1n)3(n+1)[(n−3)334τ3]n+1(−ξ~2θ~')2(n+1)[3nτn−3]4n

 

=

34(4π)−(n+1)(n−3n)n−3(n+1n)3(n+1)n3(n+1)[n−3n]3(n+1)(−ξ~2θ~')2(n+1)[nn−3]4nτ4n−3(n+1)34n−4(n+1)

 

=

[(n+1)34π]n+1(−ξ~2θ~')2(n+1)τn−3

⇒[PePnorm]critn−3

=

[(n+1)34π]n+1(−ξ~2θ~')2(n+1)θ~(n+1)(n−3).

Q.E.D.


And (3),

[ReqRSWS]crit2(n+1)

=

[32⋅54π𝔣~W]n+1[n−3n](n−1)[𝔣~A4]2n

 

=

[32⋅54π]n+1[n−3n](n−1)[nτn−3]2n[(n−3)ξ~232⋅5τ]n+1

 

=

[14π]n+1[nn−3]n+1[(n−3)ξ~2]n+1τn−1

⇒[ReqRSWS]crit2

=

(n4π)ξ~2θ~n−1

Q.E.D.

And (4),

[MtotMSWS]crit2(n+1)

=

[53𝔣~M2𝔣~W3]n+1(34π)4[(n−3)4πn](n−3)(3𝔣~A4)4n

 

=

{[(n−3)334τ3](−ξ~2θ~')2}n+134(4π)−(n+1)(n−3n)(n−3)[3nτn−3]4n

 

=

[n34π]n+1(−ξ~2θ~')2(n+1)τn−3

⇒[MtotMSWS]crit2

=

[n34π](−ξ~2θ~')2θ~n−3

Q.E.D.


See Also[edit]

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |