SSC/FreeEnergy/PolytropesEmbedded/Pt1

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Free Energy of Embedded Polytropes[edit]


Part I:   Synopsis
 

Part II:  Truncated Polytropes
 

Part III:  Free-Energy of Bipolytropes
 

IIIA:  Focus on (5, 1) Bipolytropes
 

IIIB:  Focus on (0, 0) Bipolytropes
 

IIIC:  Overview
 


Free-Energy Synopsis[edit]

All of the self-gravitating configurations considered below have an associated Gibbs-like free-energy that can be expressed analytically as a power-law function of the dimensionless configuration radius, x. Specifically,

𝔊type*

=

ax1+bx3/n+cx3/j+𝔊0.

Equilibrium Radii and Critical Radii[edit]

The first and second (partial) derivatives with respect to x are, respectively,

𝔊type*x

=

ax2(3bn)x3/n1(3cj)x3/j1

 

=

1x2[a(3bn)x(n3)/n(3cj)x(j3)/j],

2𝔊type*x2

=

2ax3+(3bn)(n+3n)x3/n2+(3cj)(j+3j)x3/j2

 

=

1x3{(3bn)(n+3n)x(n3)/n+(3cj)(j+3j)x(j3)/j2a}.

Equilibrium configurations are identified by setting the first derivative to zero. This gives,

0

=

a(3bn)xeq(n3)/n(3cj)xeq(j3)/j

xeq(n3)/n

=

(n3b)[a(3cj)xeq(j3)/j].

bncxeq(n3)/na3c+1jxeq(j3)/j

=

0.

We conclude, as well, that at this equilibrium radius, the second (partial) derivative assumes the value,

[2𝔊type*x2]eq

=

1xeq3{(3bn)(n+3n)x(n3)/n+(3cj)(j+3j)x(j3)/j2a}eq

 

=

1xeq3{(n+3n)[a(3cj)xeq(j3)/j]+(3cj)(j+3j)xeq(j3)/j2a}

 

=

1xeq3{(3cj)[(j+3j)(n+3n)]xeq(j3)/j+(3nn)a}.

Hence, equilibrium configurations for which the second (as well as first) derivative of the free energy is zero are found at "critical" radii given by the expression,

0

=

(3cj)[(j+3j)(n+3n)][xeq(j3)/j]crit+(3nn)a

[xeq(j3)/j]crit

=

[j2a(n3)3c][n(j+3)j(n+3)]1

 

=

a32c[j2(n3)nj].

Examples[edit]

Pressure-Truncated Polytropes[edit]

For pressure-truncated polytropes of index n, we set, j=1, in which case,

bncxeq(n3)/na3cxeq4

=

0;

[(34π)MtotMSWS](n+1)/nxeq(n3)/n320π(n+1n)(MtotMSWS)2xeq4

=

0;

xeq(n3)/n

=

(n3b)[a+3cxeq4];

 

and

 

[xeq]crit

=

[a(n3)32c(n+1)]1/4.

Case M[edit]

More specifically, the expression that describes the "Case M" free-energy surface is,

𝔊K,M*𝔊K,MEnorm

=

3𝒜(RRnorm)1+n(RRnorm)3/n+(4π3)PePnorm(RRnorm)3.


Hence, we have,

a

3𝒜=35𝔣~W𝔣~M2,

b

n=n(4π3)1/n𝔣~A𝔣~M(n+1)/n,

c

4π3(PePnorm),

where the structural form factors for pressure-truncated polytropes are precisely defined here. Therefore, the statement of virial equilibrium is,

0

=

bncxeq(n3)/na3cxeq4

(34π)cxeq4

=

(34π)[bnxeq(n3)/na3]

(PePnorm)xeq4

=

(34π)[(34π)1/n𝔣~A𝔣~M(n+1)/nxeq(n3)/n15𝔣~W𝔣~M2]

 

=

(34π)(n+1)/n𝔣~A𝔣~M(n+1)/nxeq(n3)/n320π𝔣~W𝔣~M2.

And we conclude that,

3c[xeq]crit4

=

(n3)5(n+1)𝔣~W𝔣~M2

(PePnorm)[xeq]crit4

=

120π(n3n+1)𝔣~W𝔣~M2

(34π)(n+1)/n𝔣~A𝔣~M(n+1)/n[xeq]crit(n3)/n320π𝔣~W𝔣~M2

=

120π(n3n+1)𝔣~W𝔣~M2

(34π)(n+1)/n𝔣~A𝔣~M(n+1)/n[xeq]crit(n3)/n

=

120π(n3n+1)𝔣~W𝔣~M2+320π𝔣~W𝔣~M2

 

=

120π(4nn+1)𝔣~W𝔣~M2

[xeq]crit(n3)/n

=

120π(4π3)(n+1)/n(4nn+1)𝔣~W𝔣~A𝔣~M(n1)/n

[xeq]crit

=

[4n15(n+1)(4π3)1/n𝔣~W𝔣~A𝔣~M(n1)/n]n/(n3).

ASIDE:  Let's see what this requires for the case of n=5, where everything is specifiable analytically. We have gathered together:

  • Form factors from here.
  • Hoerdt's equilibrium expressions from here.
  • Conversion from Horedt's units to ours as specified here.

𝔣~M

=

(1+2)3/2

𝔣~W

=

5245[(48321)(1+2)3+tan1()]

𝔣~A

=

3233[tan1()+(21)(1+2)2]

ReqRnorm=ReqRHoredt[4π(n+1)n]1/(n3)

=

{3[(ξe2/3)5(1+ξe2/3)6]}1/2[4π(n+1)n]1/(n3)

 

=

[(1+2)35][π2336]1/2

PePnorm=PePHoredt[(n+1)34π](n+1)/(n3)

=

33[(ξe2/3)3(1+ξe2/3)4]3[(n+1)34π](n+1)/(n3)

 

=

[18(1+2)12][234π]3

So, the radius of the critical equilibrium state should be,

[ReqRnorm]crit4

=

(n3)35(n+1)(322π)(PePnorm)1𝔣~W𝔣~M2

 

=

12235π{(1+2)1218[π234]3}(1+2)3{5245[(48321)(1+2)3+tan1()]}

 

=

π229313{(1+2)1223}{[(48321)+(1+2)3tan1()]};

whereas, each equilibrium configuration has,

[ReqRnorm]4

=

π226312[(1+2)1220].

So the equilibrium state that marks the critical configuration must have a value of that satisfies the relation,

π226312[(1+2)1220]

=

π229313{(1+2)1223}{[(48321)+(1+2)3tan1()]}

2333

=

(48321)+(1+2)3tan1()

[(1+2)3]tan1()

=

1+80324.

The solution is: crit2.223175.


In addition, we know from our dissection of Hoerdt's work on detailed force-balance models that, in the equilibrium state,

(PePnorm)(ReqRnorm)4

=

[θ~n+1(4π)(n+1)(θ~)2]

3cxeq4

=

[θ~n+1(n+1)(θ~)2].

This means that, for any chosen polytropic index, the critical equilibrium state is the equilibrium configuration for which (needs to be checked),

2(92n)θ~n+1

=

3(n3)[(θ~')2θ~(θ~')ξ~].

We note, as well, that by combining the Horedt expression for xeq with our virial equilibrium expression, we find (needs to be checked),

xeqn3

=

4π3[3(n+1)ξ~2+𝔣~W𝔣~M5𝔣~A]n𝔣~M1n.

Case P[edit]

First Pass[edit]

Alternatively, let's examine the "Case P" free-energy surface. Drawing on Stahler's presentation, we adopt the following radius and mass normalizations:

MSWS=(n+1n)3/2G3/2Kn2n/(n+1)Pe(3n)/[2(n+1)],

RSWS=(n+1n)1/2G1/2Knn/(n+1)Pe(1n)/[2(n+1)].

In terms of these new normalizations, we have,

Rnorm[(GK)nMtot(n1)]1/(n3)

=

(GK)n/(n3)Mtot(n1)/(n3)RSWS(n+1n)1/2G1/2Knn/(n+1)Pe(1n)/[2(n+1)]

 

 

+MSWS(n1)/(n3)[(n+1n)3/2G3/2Kn2n/(n+1)Pe(3n)/[2(n+1)]](n1)/(n3)

 

=

RSWS(MtotMSWS)(n1)/(n3)(n+1n)[3(n1)(n3)]/[2(n3)]G[2n+(n3)3(n1)]/[2(n3)]

 

 

+Knn[2(n1)(n+1)(n3)]/[(n+1)(n3)]Pe(n1)(3n)/[2(n+1)(n3)]Pe(n1)(3n)/[2(n+1)(n3)]

 

=

RSWS(MtotMSWS)(n1)/(n3)(n+1n)n/(n3).

and,

Pnorm[K4nG3(n+1)Mtot2(n+1)]1/(n3)

=

[K4nG3(n+1)]1/(n3)(MtotMSWS)2(n+1)/(n3){(n+1n)3/2G3/2Kn2n/(n+1)Pe(3n)/[2(n+1)]}2(n+1)/(n3)

 

=

(MtotMSWS)2(n+1)/(n3)(n+1n)3(n+1)/(n3)K4n/(n3)G3(n+1)/(n3)

 

 

×G3(n+1)/(n3)Kn4n/(n3){Pe(n3)/[2(n+1)]}2(n+1)/(n3)

 

=

Pe(MtotMSWS)2(n+1)/(n3)(n+1n)3(n+1)/(n3).

Rewriting the expression for the free energy gives,

𝔊K,M*𝔊K,MEnorm

=

3𝒜(RRSWS)1(RnormRSWS)+n(RRSWS)3/n(RnormRSWS)3/n+(4π3)PePnorm(RRSWS)3(RnormRSWS)3

 

=

3𝒜(RRSWS)1[(MtotMSWS)(n1)/(n3)(n+1n)n/(n3)]

 

 

+n(RRSWS)3/n[(MtotMSWS)(n1)/(n3)(n+1n)n/(n3)]3/n

 

 

+(4π3)(MtotMSWS)2(n+1)/(n3)(n+1n)3(n+1)/(n3)(RRSWS)3[(MtotMSWS)(n1)/(n3)(n+1n)n/(n3)]3

 

=

3𝒜(n+1n)n/(n3)(MtotMSWS)(n1)/(n3)(RRSWS)1+n(n+1n)3/(n3)(MtotMSWS)3(n1)/[n(n3)](RRSWS)3/n

 

 

+(4π3)(n+1n)3/(n3)(MtotMSWS)(5n)/(n3)(RRSWS)3.


Therefore, in this case, we have,

a

=

35𝔣~W𝔣~M2(n+1n)n/(n3)(MtotMSWS)(n1)/(n3),

b

=

n(4π3)1/n𝔣~A𝔣~M(n+1)/n(n+1n)3/(n3)(MtotMSWS)3(n1)/[n(n3)],

c

=

4π3(n+1n)3/(n3)(MtotMSWS)(5n)/(n3),

where the structural form factors for pressure-truncated polytropes are precisely defined here. The statement of virial equilibrium is, therefore,

xeq4+α

=

βxeq(n3)/n,

where,

αa3c

=

15𝔣~W𝔣~M2(n+1n)n/(n3)(MtotMSWS)(n1)/(n3){34π(n+1n)3/(n3)(MtotMSWS)(n5)/(n3)}

 

=

320π𝔣~W𝔣~M2(n+1n)(MtotMSWS)2

 

=

(4π35)𝔣~W(n+1n)𝔪2,

βbnc

=

(4π3)1/n𝔣~A𝔣~M(n+1)/n(n+1n)3/(n3)(MtotMSWS)3(n1)/[n(n3)]{34π(n+1n)3/(n3)(MtotMSWS)(n5)/(n3)}

 

=

𝔣~A𝔪(n+1)/n,

𝔪

(34π)1𝔣~M(MtotMSWS).

From a previous derivation, we have,

0

=

bncxeq(n3)/na3cxeq4

 

=

34π(n+1n)3/(n3)(MtotMSWS)(n5)/(n3){(34π)1/n𝔣~A𝔣~M(n+1)/n(n+1n)3/(n3)(MtotMSWS)3(n1)/[n(n3)]}xeq(n3)/n

 

 

34π(n+1n)3/(n3)(MtotMSWS)(n5)/(n3){15𝔣~W𝔣~M2(n+1n)n/(n3)(MtotMSWS)(n1)/(n3)}xeq4

0

=

(34π)(n+1)/n𝔣~A𝔣~M(n+1)/n(MtotMSWS)(n+1)/nxeq(n3)/n320π𝔣~W𝔣~M2(n+1n)(MtotMSWS)2xeq4

 

=

𝔣~A[(34π)1𝔣~M(MtotMSWS)](n+1)/nxeq(n3)/n15(4π3)𝔣~W(n+1n)[(34π)1𝔣~M(MtotMSWS)]2xeq4

which, thankfully, matches! We conclude as well that the transition from stable to dynamically unstable configurations occurs at,

[xeq]crit4

=

[(n3)3(n+1)]α.

When combined with the statement of virial equilibrium at this critical point, we find,

{[(n3)3(n+1)]+1}αβ

=

[xeq]crit(n3)/n

 

=

{[(n3)3(n+1)]α}(n3)/(4n)

[4n3(n+1)]4n(αβ)4n

=

[(n3)3(n+1)](n3)α(n3)

[3n(n3)(n+1n)](3n)[34(n+1n)]4n

=

α3(n+1)β4n

 

=

{(4π35)𝔣~W(n+1n)𝔪2}3(n+1){𝔣~A𝔪(n+1)/n}4n

 

=

𝔣~A4n[(4π35)𝔣~W(n+1n)]3(n+1)𝔪2(n+1)

𝔪2(n+1)

=

[(4π35)𝔣~W(n+1n)]3(n+1)[3n(n3)(n+1n)](3n)[3𝔣~A4(n+1n)]4n

 

=

[(354π)1𝔣~W]3(n+1)[3n(n3)](3n)[3𝔣~A4]4n

 

=

[325n4π(n3)1𝔣~W](3n)[(32524π)𝔣~A𝔣~W]4n.

This also means that the critical radius is,

[xeq]crit4

=

[(n3)3(n+1)](4π35)𝔣~W(n+1n)𝔪2

 

=

[325n4π(n3)1𝔣~W]1𝔪2

[xeq]crit4(n+1)

=

[325n4π(n3)1𝔣~W](n+1)[325n4π(n3)1𝔣~W](3n)[(32524π)𝔣~A𝔣~W]4n

 

=

[4π(n3)325n𝔣~W]2(n1)[(32524π)𝔣~A𝔣~W]4n

[xeq]crit2(n+1)

=

[n(n3)(3254π𝔣~W)](1n)[(3254π𝔣~W)𝔣~A4]2n

 

=

(nn3)(1n)(3254π𝔣~W)(n+1)(𝔣~A4)2n.


The following parallel derivation was done independently. [Note that a factor of 2n/(n-1) appears to correct a mistake made during the original derivation.] Beginning with the virial expression,

βxeq(n3)/n

=

α+xeq4

(34π)(n+1)/n𝔣~A𝔣~M(n+1)/n(MtotMSWS)(n+1)/n[xeq]crit(n3)/n

=

320π𝔣~W𝔣~M2(n+1n)(MtotMSWS)2+(n3)20πn(MtotMSWS)2𝔣~W𝔣~M2

 

=

(n1)10πn(MtotMSWS)2𝔣~W𝔣~M2[2n(n1)]

[xeq]crit(n3)/n

=

2(n1)15n(4π3)1/n𝔣~W𝔣~A𝔣~M(n1)/n(MtotMSWS)(n1)/n[2n(n1)]

[xeq]crit(n3)

=

[2(n1)15n]n(4π3)𝔣~Wn𝔣~An𝔣~M(n1)(MtotMSWS)(n1)[2n(n1)]n

 

=

[2(n1)15n]n(4π3)𝔣~Wn𝔣~An𝔣~M(n1){[20πn(n3)](n1)/2(𝔣~M2𝔣~W)(n1)/2[xeq]crit2(n1)}[2n(n1)]n

 

=

[2(n1)15n]n(4π3)𝔣~W(n+1)/2𝔣~An{[20πn(n3)](n1)/2[xeq]crit2(n1)}[2n(n1)]n

[xeq]crit(n+1)

=

(34π)[15n2(n1)]n[(n3)20πn](n1)/2𝔣~An𝔣~W(n+1)/2[(n1)2n]n

[xeq]crit(n+1)

=

(34π)[1522]n[(n3)20πn](n1)/2𝔣~An𝔣~W(n+1)/2


Also from Stahler's work we know that the equilibrium mass and radius are,

MtotMSWS

=

(n34π)1/2[θ~n(n3)/2ξ~2(θ~')],

ReqRSWS

=

(n4π)1/2[ξ~θ~n(n1)/2].

Additional details in support of an associated PowerPoint presentation can be found here.

Reconcile[edit]

[ReqRSWS]crit4

=

[(n3)20π(n+1)](n+1n)(MtotMSWS)2𝔣~W𝔣~M2

(ReqRnorm)crit4

=

120π(n3n+1)(PePnorm)1𝔣~W𝔣~M2

Taking the ratio, the RHS is,

(MtotMSWS)2(PePnorm)

=

PeMtot2[G3(n+1)Mtot2(n+1)K4n]1/(n3)[(n+1n)3/2G3/2Kn2n/(n+1)Pe(3n)/[2(n+1)]]2(n+1n)

 

=

(n+1n)2PeMtot2[G3Mtot2](n+1)/(n3)Kn4n/(n3)[G3Kn4n/(n+1)Pe(n3)/(n+1)]

 

=

(n+1n)2[G3Mtot2][(n3)+(n+1)]/(n3)[Kn[(n+1)+(n3)]/[(n+1)(n3)]]4nPe[(n+1)+(n3)]/(n+1)

 

=

(n+1n)2Mtot4(n1)/(n3)G[6(n1)]/(n3)Kn8(n1)/[(n+1)(n3)]Pe2(n1)/(n+1);

while the LHS is,

(RnormRSWS)4

=

[(GK)nMtot(n1)]4/(n3){(n+1n)1/2G1/2Knn/(n+1)Pe(1n)/[2(n+1)]}4

 

=

(n+1n)2Mtot4(n1)/(n3)G[6(n1)]/(n3)K8n(n1)/[(n3)(n+1)]Pe2(n1)/(n+1).

Q.E.D.

Now, given that,

MSWS4(n1)/(n3)

=

[(n+1n)3/2G3/2Kn2n/(n+1)Pe(3n)/[2(n+1)]]4(n1)/(n3)

 

=

(n+1n)6(n1)/(n3)G6(n1)/(n3)Kn8n(n1)/[(n+1)(n3)]Pe2(n1)/(n+1)

we have,

(RnormRSWS)4

=

(n+1n)2(MtotMSWS)4(n1)/(n3)(n+1n)6(n1)/(n3)

 

=

(MtotMSWS)4(n1)/(n3)(n+1n)4n/(n3)

(RnormRSWS)n3

=

(MtotMSWS)n1(n+1n)n


By inspection, in the specific case of n=5 (see above), this critical configuration appears to coincide with one of the "turning points" identified by Kimura. Specifically, it appears to coincide with the "extremal in r1" along an M1 sequence, which satisfies the condition,

[n3n1]n=5

=

[ξ~θ~n(θ~')]n=5

12

=

31/2[(1+2)1/2]5[31/2(1+2)3/2]1

 

=

3(1+2)1

=

51/2.

Hence, according to Kimura, the turning point associated with the configuration with the largest equilibrium radius, corresponds to the equilibrium configuration having,

|Rmax=52.2360680.

This is, indeed, very close to — but decidedly different from — the value of crit determined, above!


Streamlined[edit]

Let's copy the expression for the "Case P" free energy derived above, then factor out a common term:


𝔊K,MEnorm

=

3𝒜(n+1n)n/(n3)(MtotMSWS)(n1)/(n3)(RRSWS)1+n(n+1n)3/(n3)(MtotMSWS)3(n1)/[n(n3)](RRSWS)3/n

 

 

+(4π3)(n+1n)3/(n3)(MtotMSWS)(5n)/(n3)(RRSWS)3.

 

=

(MtotMSWS)(5n)/(n3)(n+1n)3/(n3){3𝒜(n+1n)(MtotMSWS)2(RRSWS)1+n(MtotMSWS)(n+1)/n(RRSWS)3/n+4π3(RRSWS)3}

Defining a new normalization energy,

ESWS

Enorm(MtotMSWS)(5n)/(n3)(n+1n)3/(n3)

 

=

(n+1n)3/2K3n/(n+1)G3/2Pe(5n)/[2(n+1)],

we can write,

𝔊K,M*𝔊K,MESWS

=

3𝒜(n+1n)(MtotMSWS)2(RRSWS)1+n(MtotMSWS)(n+1)/n(RRSWS)3/n+4π3(RRSWS)3,

in which case the coefficients of the generic free-energy expression are,

a

=

35𝔣~W𝔣~M2(n+1n)(MtotMSWS)2=35(4π3)2(n+1n)𝔣~W𝔪2

b

=

n(34π)1/n𝔣~A𝔣~M(n+1)/n(MtotMSWS)(n+1)/n=(4πn3)𝔣~A𝔪(n+1)/n

c

=

4π3,

where, as above,

𝔪

(34π)1𝔣~M(MtotMSWS).

Now, if we define the pair of parameters,

α

a3c

β

bnc,

then the statement of virial equilibrium is,

xeq4+α

=

βxeq(n3)/n,

and the boundary between dynamical stability and instability occurs at,

[xeq]crit4

=

[n33(n+1)]α.

Combining these last two expressions means that the boundary between dynamical stability and instability is associated with the parameter condition,

[xeq]crit(n3)/n

=

[n33(n+1)+1]αβ

{[n33(n+1)]α}(n3)/(4n)

=

[4n3(n+1)]αβ

βα3(n+1)/(4n)

=

[4n3(n+1)][n3nn3(n+1)](3n)/(4n)

 

=

4[n3(n+1)]3(n+1)/(4n)[n3n](3n)/(4n)

(β4)4nα3(n+1)

=

[n3(n+1)]3(n+1)[n3n](3n)

(β4)4n

=

[nα3(n+1)]3(n+1)[nn3]n3.

Case M[edit]

a

3𝒜=35𝔣~W𝔣~M2,

b

n=n(4π3)1/n𝔣~A𝔣~M(n+1)/n,

c

4π3(PePnorm).

Hence,

α

=

(4π15)𝔣~W(34π𝔣~M)2(PePnorm)1

β

=

𝔣~A(34π𝔣~M)(n+1)/n(PePnorm)1.

So the dynamical stability conditions are:

(PePnorm)(nn3)[xeq]crit4

=

[(nn+1)4π𝔣~W325](34π𝔣~M)2;

and,

(𝔣~A4)4n(34π𝔣~M)4(n+1)(PePnorm)4n

=

[n3(n+1)]3(n+1)[nn3]n3(4π𝔣~W15)3(n+1)(34π𝔣~M)6(n+1)(PePnorm)3(n+1)

(𝔣~A4)4n

=

[(nn+1)4π𝔣~W325]3(n+1)(34π𝔣~M)2(n+1)[nn3(PePnorm)]n3

[nn3(PePnorm)]n3

=

(𝔣~A4)4n[(nn+1)4π𝔣~W325]3(n+1)(34π𝔣~M)2(n+1).

Together, then,

[xeq]crit4(n3)

=

[(nn+1)4π𝔣~W325]n3(34π𝔣~M)2(n3)[(PePnorm)nn3](n3)

 

=

[(nn+1)4π𝔣~W325]n3(34π𝔣~M)2(n3)(𝔣~A4)4n[(nn+1)4π𝔣~W325]3(n+1)(34π𝔣~M)2(n+1)

 

=

[(nn+1)4π𝔣~W325]4n(34π𝔣~M)4(n1)(𝔣~A4)4n

[xeq]crit(n3)

=

[4𝔣~A(nn+1)4π𝔣~W325]n(34π𝔣~M)(n1).

Case P[edit]

a

=

35(4π3)2(n+1n)𝔣~W𝔪2

b

=

(4πn3)𝔣~A𝔪(n+1)/n

c

=

4π3,

where, as above,

𝔪

(34π)1𝔣~M(MtotMSWS).

Hence,

α

=

15(4π3)(n+1n)𝔣~W𝔪2

β

=

𝔣~A𝔪(n+1)/n.

So the dynamical stability conditions are:

[xeq]crit4

=

[n3(n+1)][n3n]15(4π3)(n+1n)𝔣~W𝔪2

 

=

[n3n](4π𝔣~W325)𝔪2

and,

(𝔣~A4)4n𝔪4(n+1)

=

[(4π325)𝔣~W𝔪2]3(n+1)[nn3]n3

𝔪2(n+1)

=

[(4π325)𝔣~W]3(n+1)[nn3](n3)(𝔣~A4)4n.

Together, then,

[xeq]crit4(n+1)

=

[n3n](n+1)(4π𝔣~W325)(n+1)(4π𝔣~W325)3(n+1)[n3n](n3)(𝔣~A4)4n

 

=

[n3n]2(n1)(4π𝔣~W325)2(n+1)(𝔣~A4)4n.

Compare[edit]

Let's see if the two cases, in fact, provide the same answer.

(RnormRSWS)n3=[xPxM]critn3

=

{[n3n](4π𝔣~W325)𝔪2}(n3)/4{[4𝔣~A(nn+1)4π𝔣~W325]n(34π𝔣~M)(n1)}1

 

=

{[n3n](4π𝔣~W325)𝔪2}(n3)/4{[4𝔣~A(nn+1)4π𝔣~W325]n(34π𝔣~M)(n1)}1

Five-One Bipolytropes[edit]

For analytically prescribed, "five-one" bipolytropes, n=5 and j=1, in which case,

xeq2/5

=

(53b)[a3cxeq2];

 

and

 

[xeq]crit

=

[18ca]1/2.


More specifically, the expression that describes the free-energy surface is,

𝔊51*24(qν2)χeq[𝔊51Enorm]

=

1i2[X3/5(5𝔏i)+X3(4𝔎i)X1(3𝔏i+12𝔎i)].

Hence, we have,

a

3χeq(𝔏i+4𝔎i),

b

5𝔏iχeq3/5,

c

4𝔎iχeq3,

and conclude that,

[χeq]crit

=

[18(4𝔎iχeq3)3χeq(𝔏i+4𝔎i)]crit1/2

 

=

[χeq]crit[24𝔎i(𝔏i+4𝔎i)]1/2

[24𝔎i(𝔏i+4𝔎i)]crit

=

1

[𝔏i𝔎i]crit

=

20.

Also, from our detailed force balance derivations, we know that,

χeqReqRnorm

=

(π23)1/2ν2q(1+i2)333i5.

Zero-Zero Bipolytropes[edit]

General Form[edit]

In this case, we retain full generality making the substitutions, nnc and jne, to obtain,

xeq(nc3)/nc

=

nc3b[a(3cne)xeq(ne3)/ne];

 

and

 

[xeq(ne3)/ne]crit

=

{ne2(nc3)3[nc(ne+3)ne(nc+3)]}ac

 

=

[ne2(nc3)32(ncne)]ac.


And here, the expression that describes the free-energy surface is,

𝔊00*5(qν2)χeq[𝔊00Enorm]

=

52q3[ncA2X3/nc+neB2X3/ne3C2X1].

Hence, we have,

a3χeq(52q3)C2

=

3fχeq,

bncχeq3/nc(52q3)A2

ncχeq3/nc[1+q3(f1𝔉)],

cneχeq3/ne(52q3)B2

neχeq3/ne(52q3)[25q3fA2]

 

=

neχeq3/ne{f[1+q3(f1𝔉)]},

where the definitions of f and 𝔉 are given below. We immediately deduce that the critical equilibrium state is identified by,

[xeq(ne3)/ne]crit

=

{fne(nc3)3(ncne)}[χeq(ne3)/ne]crit{f[1+q3(f1𝔉)]}1

1f[1+q3(f1𝔉)]

=

1[ne(nc3)3(ncne)]

 

=

nc(3ne)3(ncne).


From our associated detailed-force-balance derivation, we know that the associated equilibrium radius is,

χeq

=

{(π3)22ncνnc1q3nc[1+25q3(f1𝔉)]nc}1/(nc3).


Compare with Five-One[edit]

It is worthwhile to set nc=5 and ne=1 in this expression and compare the result to the comparable expression shown above for the "Five-One" Bipolytrope. Here we have,

[χeq]51

=

{(π3)23ν4q2[1+25q3(f1𝔉)]5}1/2

 

=

(π23)1/2ν2q13[1+25q3(f1𝔉)]5/2;

whereas, rewriting the above relation gives,

χeq|51

=

(π23)1/2ν2q13[(1+i2)6/53i2]5/2.

And, here, we should conclude that the critical equilibrium configuration is associated with,

1f[1+q3(f1𝔉)]

=

56.

See Also[edit]

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |