SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/RedGiantToPN/Pt2: Difference between revisions
| Line 1,290: | Line 1,290: | ||
====Third Try==== | ====Third Try==== | ||
Note that, | |||
<div align="center"> | |||
<math>~ | |||
Q \equiv - \frac{d \ln \phi}{ d\ln \eta} | |||
= \biggl[1- \eta\cot(\eta-B) \biggr] = \biggl[1 + \eta\cot(B - \eta) \biggr]\, , | |||
</math> | |||
</div> | |||
and that, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>\frac{d}{d\eta}\biggl[\cot(B-\eta)\biggr]</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
+~\biggl[\sin(B-\eta)\biggr]^{-2} | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{d^2}{d\eta^2}\biggl[\cot(B-\eta)\biggr]</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
+~2\biggl[\cos(B-\eta)\biggr]^{-3} | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
Let's try … | Let's try … | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | ||
| Line 1,425: | Line 1,466: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
---- | |||
< | |||
<math> | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
= \biggl[ | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>\frac{dx_2}{d\eta} = \frac{d}{d\eta}\biggl[\frac{c}{\eta}\cdot \cot(B-\eta)\biggr]</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
-\frac{c}{\eta^2}\cdot \cot(B-\eta) | |||
+ | |||
\frac{c}{\eta}\cdot \biggl[\sin(B-\eta)\biggr]^{-2} | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\frac{c}{\eta^2}\biggl\{ -\frac{\cos(B-\eta)}{\sin(B-\eta)} | |||
+ | |||
\frac{\eta}{\sin^2(B-\eta)}\biggr\} | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\frac{c}{\eta^2}\biggl\{\eta ~-~\sin(B-\eta)\cos(B-\eta) | |||
\biggr\}\biggl[\sin(B-\eta)\biggr]^{-2} | |||
</math> | </math> | ||
</ | </td> | ||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
=Related Discussions= | =Related Discussions= | ||
{{ SGFfooter }} | {{ SGFfooter }} | ||
Revision as of 20:02, 11 January 2026
Main Sequence to Red Giant to Planetary Nebula (Part 2)
Part I: Background & Objective
|
Part II:
|
Part III:
|
Part IV:
|
Foundation
In an accompanying discussion, we derived the so-called,
whose solution gives eigenfunctions that describe various radial modes of oscillation in spherically symmetric, self-gravitating fluid configurations.
|
Introducing the dimensionless frequency-squared, , we can rewrite this LAWE as,
where, as a reminder, . Now, for our bipolytrope, we have found it useful to adopt the following four dimensionless variables:
This means that,
Making these substitutions, the LAWE can be rewritten as,
then, multiplying through by allows us to everywhere switch from to , namely,
|
In shorthand, we can rewrite this equation in the form,
|
|
|
|
where,
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
and,
and,
|
|
|
|
Specific Case of (nc, ne) = (5,1)
Drawing from our "Table 2" profiles, let's evaluate and for the two separate regions of bipolytrope model.
The nc = 5 Core
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also,
|
|
|
|
Hence, the LAWE becomes,
|
|
|
|
Multiplying through by gives,
|
|
|
|
|
Let's compare this with the equivalent expression presented separately, namely, The primary E-type solution for n = 5 polytropes states that,
Hence, the LAWE may be written as,
Versus above,
|
If we set and we set , this becomes,
|
|
|
|
Next, try the solution, and :
|
LAWE |
|
|
|
LAWE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ne = 1 Envelope
Throughout the envelope we have,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence,
|
|
|
|
and,
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
|
Let's compare this with the equivalent expression presented separately, namely, The equilibrium, off-center equilibrium solution for n = 1 polytropes states that,
Hence, the LAWE may be written as,
|
Blind Alleys
Reminder
From a separate discussion, we have demonstrated that the LAWE relevant to the envelope is,
|
|
|
|
If we assume that, and , then the relevant envelope LAWE is,
|
|
|
|
where,
Also separately, we have derived the following,
| Precise Solution to the Polytropic LAWE | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Try
|
|
|
and |
in which case,
|
LAWE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now set and set :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We see that the complexity of the LAWE reduces substantially if we set ; specifically, this choice gives,
|
|
|
|
Close, but no cigar!
Second Try
Next, let's set but let's leave unspecified:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first term goes to zero if we set ; then, in order for the second term to go to zero, we need …
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This means that the envelope is incompressible.
Third Try
Note that,
and that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let's try …
|
|
|
|
If we assume that, and , then the relevant envelope LAWE is the sum of the pair of sub-LAWEs,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One at a time:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Discussions
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |