SSC/Stability/n1PolytropeLAWE/Pt3

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Radial Oscillations of n = 1 Polytropic Spheres (Pt 3)[edit]


Part I:   Search for Analytic Solutions
 

Part II:  New Ideas
 

Part III:  What About Bipolytropes?
 

Part IV:  Most General Structural Solution
 


What About Bipolytropes?[edit]

Here we will try to find an analytic expression for the radial displacement function, x, for a bipolytropic envelope whose polytropic index is, ne=1. As in the above succinct derivation, the relevant LAWE is,

LAWE

=

d2xdξ2+[4−(n+1)Q]1ξ⋅dxdξ+(n+1)[(σc26γg)ξ2θ−αQ]xξ2

 

=

d2xdξ2+[4−2Q]1ξ⋅dxdξ+[(σc26)ξ3sin⁡ξ−2Q]xξ2

 

=

d2xdξ2+[2+2ξcos⁡ξsin⁡ξ]1ξ⋅dxdξ+[−2+2ξcos⁡ξsin⁡ξ]xξ2+[(σc26)ξsin⁡ξ]x

First Attempt[edit]

Let's try,

x

=

A+B(ξ−F)2[1−(ξ−D)cot⁡(ξ−C)].

First, note that,

ddξ[cot⁡(ξ−C)]

=

ddξ[cos⁡(ξ−C)sin⁡(ξ−C)]

 

=

−[1+cot2(ξ−C)].

Hence,

dxdξ

=

−2B(ξ−F)3[1−(ξ−D)cot⁡(ξ−C)]−B(ξ−F)2{cot⁡(ξ−C)−(ξ−D)[1+cot⁡2(ξ−C)]}

 

=

−B(ξ−F)3{[2−2(ξ−D)cot⁡(ξ−C)]−(ξ−F)[cot⁡(ξ−C)−(ξ−D)[1+cot⁡2(ξ−C)]]}

 

=

−B(ξ−F)3{2−cot⁡(ξ−C)[2(ξ−D)+(ξ−F)]+(ξ−F)(ξ−D)[1+cot⁡2(ξ−C)]}

 

=

−B(ξ−F)3{2−[3ξ−(2D+F)]cot⁡(ξ−C)+[ξ2−(D+F)ξ+FD]+[ξ2−(D+F)ξ+FD]cot⁡2(ξ−C)}

 

=

−B(ξ−F)3{[ξ2−(D+F)ξ+FD+2]−[3ξ−(2D+F)]cot⁡(ξ−C)+[ξ2−(D+F)ξ+FD]cot⁡2(ξ−C)}.

And,

d2xdξ2

=

3B(ξ−F)4{[ξ2−(D+F)ξ+FD+2]−[3ξ−(2D+F)]cot⁡(ξ−C)+[ξ2−(D+F)ξ+FD]cot⁡2(ξ−C)}

 

 

−B(ξ−F)3{[2ξ−(D+F)]−3cot⁡(ξ−C)−[3ξ−(2D+F)]dcot⁡(ξ−C)dξ+[2ξ−(D+F)]cot⁡2(ξ−C)+[ξ2−(D+F)ξ+FD]dcot2(ξ−C)dξ}

⇒[(ξ−F)4B]d2xdξ2

=

3[ξ2−(D+F)ξ+FD+2]−3[3ξ−(2D+F)]cot⁡(ξ−C)+3[ξ2−(D+F)ξ+FD]cot⁡2(ξ−C)

 

 

−(ξ−F)[2ξ−(D+F)]+3(ξ−F)cot⁡(ξ−C)−(ξ−F)[2ξ−(D+F)]cot⁡2(ξ−C)

 

 

+(ξ−F)[3ξ−(2D+F)]dcot⁡(ξ−C)dξ−(ξ−F)[ξ2−(D+F)ξ+FD]dcot2(ξ−C)dξ

 

=

3[ξ2−(D+F)ξ+FD+2]−(ξ−F)[2ξ−(D+F)]+{3(ξ−F)−3[3ξ−(2D+F)]}cot⁡(ξ−C)

 

 

+{3[ξ2−(D+F)ξ+FD]−(ξ−F)[2ξ−(D+F)]}cot2(ξ−C)

 

 

−(ξ−F)[3ξ−(2D+F)][1+cot2(ξ−C)]+(ξ−F)[ξ2−(D+F)ξ+FD]2cot⁡(ξ−C)[1+cot⁡2(ξ−C)]

 

=

3[ξ2−(D+F)ξ+FD+2]−(ξ−F)[2ξ−(D+F)]−(ξ−F)[3ξ−(2D+F)]+{3(ξ−F)−3[3ξ−(2D+F)]+2(ξ−F)[ξ2−(D+F)ξ+FD]}cot⁡(ξ−C)

 

 

+{3[ξ2−(D+F)ξ+FD]−(ξ−F)[2ξ−(D+F)]−(ξ−F)[3ξ−(2D+F)]}cot2(ξ−C)+2(ξ−F)[ξ2−(D+F)ξ+FD]cot3(ξ−C).

Let's set C=D=F and see if these expressions match the ones above.

dxdξ|C=D=F

=

−Bξ3{2+ξ2−3ξcot⁡ξ+ξ2cot⁡2ξ}.

ξ4B⋅d2xdξ2|C=D=F

=

3[ξ2+2]−(ξ)[2ξ]−ξ[3ξ]+{3(ξ)−3[3ξ]+2ξ[ξ2]}cot⁡(ξ)

 

 

+{3[ξ2]−ξ[2ξ]−ξ[3ξ]}cot2ξ+2ξ[ξ2]cot3ξ

 

=

3ξ2+6−2ξ2−3ξ2+[3ξ−9ξ+2ξ3]cot⁡(ξ)+[3ξ2−2ξ2−3ξ2]cot⁡2ξ+2ξ3cot⁡3ξ

 

=

6−2ξ2+[−6ξ+2ξ3]cot⁡(ξ)−2ξ2cot⁡2ξ+2ξ3cot⁡3ξ

Second Attempt[edit]

Up to this point we have been rather cavalier about the use of ξ (and ξi) to represent the envelope's dimensionless radius (and interface location). Let's switch to η,

r*

=

(μeμc)−1θi−2(2π)−1/2η

0

=

d2xdη2+{4−(ρ*P*)Mr*(r*)}1η⋅dxdη+12πθi4(μeμc)−2(ρ*P*){2πσc23γg−αgMr*(r*)3}x.

and, throughout the envelope we have,

ρ*P*

=

(μeμc)θi−1ϕ(η)−1;

Mr*r*

=

(μeμc)−2θi−1(2π)1/2(−η2dϕdη)[(μeμc)−1θi−2(2π)−1/2η]−1=2(μeμc)−1θiη(−dϕdη).

Hence, the LAWE relevant to the envelope is,

0

=

d2xdη2+{4−[ρ*P*][Mr*(r*)]}1η⋅dxdη+12πθi4(μeμc)−2[ρ*P*]{2πσc23γg−αe(r*)2[Mr*r*]}x

 

=

d2xdη2+{4−[(μeμc)θi−1ϕ(η)−1][2(μeμc)−1θiη(−dϕdη)]}1η⋅dxdη+12πθi4(μeμc)−2[(μeμc)θi−1ϕ(η)−1]{2πσc23γg−αe[(μeμc)−1θi−2(2π)−1/2η]−2[2(μeμc)−1θiη(−dϕdη)]}x

 

=

d2xdη2+{4−[2ηϕ(−dϕdη)]}1η⋅dxdη+12πθi5ϕ(μeμc)−1{2πσc23γg−αe[(μeμc)θi5(4π)η−1](−dϕdη)}x

 

=

d2xdη2+{4−[2ηϕ(−dϕdη)]}1η⋅dxdη+12πθi5ϕ(μeμc)−1{2πσc23γg}x−αe[2ηϕ(−dϕdη)]xη2.

If we assume that, αe=(3−4/2)=1 and σc2=0, then the relevant envelope LAWE is,

0

=

d2xdη2+{4−2Q}1η⋅dxdη−[2Q]xη2,

where,

Q≡−dln⁡ϕdln⁡η.

Now consider the,

Precise Solution to the Polytropic LAWE

xP

=

b(n−1)2n[1+(n−3n−1)(1ηϕn)dϕdη]

 

=

−b[(1ηϕ)dϕdη]

 

=

bη2[−dln⁡ϕdln⁡η]

 

=

bQη2.

From our accompanying discussion, we recall that the most general solution to the n=1 Lane-Emden equation can be written in the form,

ϕ=A[sin⁡(η−B)η],

where A and B are constants whose values can be obtained from our accompanying parameter table. The first derivative of this function is,

dϕdη=Aη2[ηcos⁡(η−B)−sin⁡(η−B)].

Hence,

Q=−dln⁡ϕdln⁡η

=

−ηϕ⋅Aη2[ηcos⁡(η−B)−sin⁡(η−B)]

 

=

[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)]

⇒xP

=

bη2[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)].

What is this in terms of the dimensionless radius, r*/R*? Well,

r*R*

=

(μeμc)−1θi−2(2π)−1/2η[2πθi2ηs(μeμc)]

 

=

ηηs=η(π+B)

⇒η

=

r*R*(π+B).

Also,

η−B

=

r*R*(π+B)−B=π(r*R*)−B[1−(r*R*)]

 

=

π+π[(r*R*)−1]−B[1−(r*R*)]

 

=

π−(π+B)[1−(r*R*)].


[12 January 2019]: Here's what appears to work pretty well, empirically:

xP

=

1η2{1−ηcot⁡[η−(π−0.8)]}.

η

=

r*R*(π−0.6π).


Let's work through the analytic derivatives again. Keeping in mind that,

ddη[cot⁡(η−B)]

=

−[1+cot2(η−B)],

and starting with the guess,

xP

=

bη2[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)],

we have,

dxPdη

=

−2bη3[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)]−bη2{cot⁡(η−B)−η[1+cot⁡2(η−B)]}

⇒(η3b)dxPdη

=

−[2−2ηcot⁡(η−B)]−{ηcot⁡(η−B)−η2[1+cot⁡2(η−B)]}

 

=

η2−2+ηcot⁡(η−B)+η2cot⁡2(η−B).

The second derivative then gives,

d2xPdη2

=

ddη{bη3[η2−2+ηcot⁡(η−B)+η2cot⁡2(η−B)]}

 

=

−3bη4[η2−2+ηcot⁡(η−B)+η2cot⁡2(η−B)]

 

 

+bη3{2η+cot⁡(η−B)+2ηcot⁡2(η−B)+ηddη[cot⁡(η−B)]+2η2cot⁡(η−B)ddη[cot⁡(η−B)]}

⇒d2xPdη2

=

bη4[6−3η2−3ηcot⁡(η−B)−3η2cot⁡2(η−B)]

 

 

+bη4{2η2+ηcot⁡(η−B)+2η2cot⁡2(η−B)−η2[1+cot⁡2(η−B)]−2η3cot⁡(η−B)[1+cot⁡2(η−B)]}

⇒η4b⋅d2xPdη2

=

6−3η2−3ηcot⁡(η−B)−3η2cot⁡2(η−B)

 

 

+2η2+ηcot⁡(η−B)+2η2cot⁡2(η−B)−η2−η2cot⁡2(η−B)−2η3cot⁡(η−B)−2η3cot⁡3(η−B)

 

=

2[3−η2−(η+η3)cot⁡(η−B)−η2cot⁡2(η−B)−η3cot⁡3(η−B)].

Recalling that,

Q=[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)],

plugging these expressions into the relevant envelope LAWE gives,

LAWE

=

d2xdη2+{4−2Q}1η⋅dxdη−2Q⋅xη2

 

=

d2xdη2+{4−2[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)]}1η⋅dxdη−[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)]2xη2

 

=

bη4{η4b⋅d2xdη2+[1+ηcot⁡(η−B)]2η3b⋅dxdη−[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)]2η2xb}

 

=

2bη4{3−η2−(η+η3)cot⁡(η−B)−η2cot⁡2(η−B)−η3cot⁡3(η−B)

 

 

+[1+ηcot⁡(η−B)][η2−2+ηcot⁡(η−B)+η2cot⁡2(η−B)]−[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)][1−ηcot⁡(η−B)]}

 

=

2bη4{3−η2−(η+η3)cot⁡(η−B)−η2cot⁡2(η−B)−η3cot⁡3(η−B)+[η2−2+ηcot⁡(η−B)+η2cot⁡2(η−B)]−[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)]

 

 

+ηcot⁡(η−B)[η2−2+ηcot⁡(η−B)+η2cot⁡2(η−B)]+ηcot⁡(η−B)[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)]}

 

=

2bη4{−(η+η3)cot⁡(η−B)−η3cot⁡3(η−B)+2ηcot⁡(η−B)

 

 

+η3cot⁡(η−B)−2ηcot⁡(η−B)+η2cot⁡2(η−B)+η3cot⁡3(η−B)+ηcot⁡(η−B)−η2cot⁡2(η−B)}

 

=

2bη4{[−ηcot⁡(η−B)−ηcot⁡(η−B)+2ηcot⁡(η−B)]+[η3cot⁡(η−B)−η3cot⁡(η−B)]

 

 

+[η2cot2(η−B)−η2cot2(η−B)]+[η3cot3(η−B)−η3cot3(η−B)]}

 

=

0.

Okay. Now let's determine at what value of η the logarithmic derivative of xP goes to negative one.

dln⁡xPdln⁡η=ηxP⋅dxPdη

=

η3b[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)]−1⋅dxPdη

 

=

[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)]−1[η2−2+ηcot⁡(η−B)+η2cot⁡2(η−B)].

Setting this to negative one, we have,

−[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)]

=

[η2−2+ηcot⁡(η−B)+η2cot⁡2(η−B)]

⇒1

=

η2[1+cot2(η−B)]

 

=

η2[1sin2(η−B)]

⇒1

=

η2sin2(η−B).

And this occurs when,

(Aϕ)2=1.

Third Attempt[edit]

Prior to the Brute-Force Trial Fit[edit]

Let's work through the analytic derivatives again. Keeping in mind that,

ddη[cot⁡(η−C)]

=

−[1+cot2(η−C)],

and starting with the guess,

xP

=

bη2[1−ηcot⁡(η−C)],

we have,

(η3b)dxPdη

=

η2−2+ηcot⁡(η−C)+η2cot⁡2(η−C),

and,

η4b⋅d2xPdη2

=

2[3−η2−(η+η3)cot⁡(η−C)−η2cot⁡2(η−C)−η3cot⁡3(η−C)].


Note that the relevant logarithmic derivative is,

dln⁡xPdln⁡η

=

(bη2)[η2−2+ηcot⁡(η−C)+η2cot⁡2(η−C)]xP−1

 

=

[η2−2+ηcot⁡(η−C)+η2cot⁡2(η−C)][1−ηcot⁡(η−C)]−1

If we know the logarithmic slope and the value of η at the interface, then we can solve for

yi≡ηicot⁡(ηi−C),

via the quadratic relation,

(1−yi)[dln⁡xPdln⁡η]i

=

ηi2−2+yi+yi2

⇒0

=

ηi2−2+yi+yi2−(1−yi)[dln⁡xPdln⁡η]i

 

=

yi2+yi{1+[dln⁡xPdln⁡η]i}+{ηi2−2−[dln⁡xPdln⁡η]i}.

(In practice it appears as though the "plus" solution to this quadratic equation is desired if the quantity inside the last set of curly braces is positive; and the "minus" solution is desired if this quantity is negative.) Once the value of yi is known, we can solve for the key coefficient, C, via the relation,

tan⁡(ηi−C)

=

ηiyi

⇒C

=

ηi−tan−1(ηiyi).


Recalling that,

Q=[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)],

plugging these expressions into the relevant envelope LAWE gives,

LAWE

=

d2xdη2+{4−2Q}1η⋅dxdη−2Q⋅xη2

 

=

d2xdη2+{4−2[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)]}1η⋅dxdη−[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)]2xη2

 

=

bη4{η4b⋅d2xdη2+[1+ηcot⁡(η−B)]2η3b⋅dxdη−[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)]2η2xb}

 

=

2bη4{3−η2−(η+η3)cot⁡(η−C)−η2cot⁡2(η−C)−η3cot⁡3(η−C)

 

 

+[1+ηcot⁡(η−B)][η2−2+ηcot⁡(η−C)+η2cot⁡2(η−C)]−[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)][1−ηcot⁡(η−C)]}

 

=

2bη4{3−η2−(η+η3)cot⁡(η−C)−η2cot⁡2(η−C)−η3cot⁡3(η−C)+[η2−2+ηcot⁡(η−C)+η2cot⁡2(η−C)]−[1−ηcot⁡(η−C)]

 

 

+ηcot⁡(η−B)[η2−2+ηcot⁡(η−C)+η2cot⁡2(η−C)]+ηcot⁡(η−B)[1−ηcot⁡(η−C)]}

 

=

2bη4{(η−η3)cot⁡(η−C)−η3cot⁡3(η−C)+ηcot⁡(η−B)[η2−1+η2cot⁡2(η−C)]}

 

=

2bη4{(η−η3)[cot⁡(η−C)−cot⁡(η−B)]+η3cot⁡2(η−C)[cot⁡(η−B)−cot⁡(η−C)]}

 

=

2bη4[cot⁡(η−C)−cot⁡(η−B)][η−η3−η3cot⁡2(η−C)]

 

=

2bη3[cot⁡(η−C)−cot⁡(η−B)]{1−η2[1+cot⁡2(η−C)]}.

This will go to zero if C=(B−2mπ), where m is a positive integer. When m=1, for example,

cot⁡(η−C)

=

cot⁡[η−(B−2π)]=cot⁡(η−B).


Okay. Now let's determine at what value of η the logarithmic derivative of xP goes to negative one.

Brute-Force Trial Fit[edit]

Photo of white board with steps showing development of trial eigenfunction. This should be paired with an Excel spreadsheet.

Using a couple of separate Excel spreadsheets — FaulknerBipolytrope2.xlsx/mu100Mode0 and AnalyticTrialBipolytropeA.xlsx/Sheet2, both stored in a DropBox account under the folder Wiki_edits/Bipolytrope/LinearPerturbation — we used an inelegant and inefficient trial & error technique in search of an eigenfunction that had the same analytic form as the one represented above for xP, but that, when plotted, appeared to qualitatively match the numerically determined envelope eigenfunction. Then, on a whiteboard — see the photo, here on the right — we formulated a concise expression for a trial function that seemed to work pretty well. Our primary finding was that α, appearing as the argument to the tan⁡α function, needed to be shifted by something like −3π/4.

 

THIS SPACE

INTENTIONALLY

LEFT BLANK

Following Up on the Brute-Force Trial Fit[edit]

In an accompanying discussion — see especially Attempt #2 — we have determined by visual inspection that a decent fit to the envelope's eigenfunction is given by the expression,

xtrial

=

b0Λ2{1−Λ[tan⁡(ηi−Λ−3π/4)+fα1−fα⋅tan⁡(ηi−Λ−3π/4)]}−a0

 

=

b0Λ2{1−Λcot⁡(Λ−E)}−a0,

Limiting Parameter Values
  min max α=αs
ηF ηi ηs 8π(ηs−ηi)2+2ηs−ηi
α −π2 −5π8 ηi−ηs−3π4
Λ ηi−π4 ηi−π8 ηs

where, over the range, ηi≤η≤ηs,

E

≡

ηi−5π4+tan−1fα,

Λ(η)

≡

ηi+gF[ηi−2ηs+η]=Λ0+gFη,

1fα=tan⁡(αs)

≡

tan⁡[−(ηs−ηi+3π4)],

gF

≡

π8(ηs−ηi).



Here, we reference a separate discussion of the bipolytrope's underlying equilibrium structure

B=ηi−π2+tan−1f E=ηi−5π4+tan−1fα

⇒cot⁡(ηi−B)

=

tan⁡[π2−(ηi−B)]

 

=

tan⁡[π2−(π2−tan⁡−1f)]

 

=

f

⇒f

=

tan⁡(B+π2−ηi)

⇒cot⁡(ηi−E)

=

tan⁡[π2−(ηi−E)]

 

=

tan⁡[π2−(5π4−tan⁡−1fα)]

 

=

tan⁡(tan⁡−1fα−3π4)

 

=

−tan⁡(3π4−tan⁡−1fα)

 

=

−cot⁡(tan⁡−1fα)

 

=

−1fα

Hence …     cot⁡(η−B)

=

tan⁡[π2−(η−B)]

 

=

tan⁡[π2−η+ηi−π2+tan⁡−1f]

 

=

tan⁡[ηi−η+tan⁡−1f]

 

=

tan⁡(ηi−η)+f1−f⋅tan⁡(ηi−η)

Hence …     cot⁡(Λ−E)

=

tan⁡[π2−(Λ−E)]

 

=

tan⁡[ηi−Λ−3π4+tan⁡−1fα]

 

=

tan⁡(ηi−Λ−3π4)+fα1−fα⋅tan⁡(ηi−Λ−3π4)

Also …    B=ηs−π

⇒f=cot⁡(ηi−B)

=

cot⁡(ηi−ηs+π)

⇒1f

=

tan⁡(ηi−ηs+π)



Let's examine the first and second derivatives of this trial eigenfunction, recognizing that,

dxtrialdη=dΛdη⋅dxtrialdΛ=gF⋅dxtrialdΛ

      and      

d2xtrialdη2=dΛdη⋅ddΛ[gF⋅dxtrialdΛ]=gF2⋅d2xtrialdΛ2.

and drawing from the derivative expressions already derived, above. For the first derivative, we have,

dxtrialdη

=

gF(b0Λ3)[Λ2−2+Λcot⁡(Λ−E)+Λ2cot⁡2(Λ−E)].

And the second derivative gives,

d2xtrialdη2

=

gF2(2b0Λ4)[3−Λ2−(Λ+Λ3)cot⁡(Λ−E)−Λ2cot⁡2(Λ−E)−Λ3cot⁡3(Λ−E)].

Hence,

LAWE

=

d2xtrialdη2+{4−2Q}1η⋅dxtrialdη−2Q⋅xtrialη2

 

=

d2xtrialdη2+{4−2[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)]}1η⋅dxtrialdη−[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)]2xtrialη2

 

=

b0η4{η4b0⋅d2xtrialdη2+[1+ηcot⁡(η−B)]2η3b0⋅dxtrialdη−[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)]2η2xtrialb0}

 

=

b0η4{η4b0⋅gF2(2b0Λ4)[3−Λ2−(Λ+Λ3)cot⁡(Λ−E)−Λ2cot⁡2(Λ−E)−Λ3cot⁡3(Λ−E)]

 

 

+[1+ηcot⁡(η−B)]2η3b0⋅gF(b0Λ3)[Λ2−2+Λcot⁡(Λ−E)+Λ2cot⁡2(Λ−E)]

 

 

−[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)]2η2b0⋅[b0Λ2{1−Λcot⁡(Λ−E)}−a0]}

 

=

b0η4{gF2(2η4Λ4)[3−Λ2−(Λ+Λ3)cot⁡(Λ−E)−Λ2cot⁡2(Λ−E)−Λ3cot⁡3(Λ−E)]

 

 

+[1+ηcot⁡(η−B)]⋅gF(2η3Λ3)[Λ2−2+Λcot⁡(Λ−E)+Λ2cot⁡2(Λ−E)]

 

 

−[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)][2η2Λ2[1−Λcot⁡(Λ−E)]−2η2a0b0]}

 

=

2b0Λ4η2{gF2η2[3−Λ2−(Λ+Λ3)cot⁡(Λ−E)−Λ2cot⁡2(Λ−E)−Λ3cot⁡3(Λ−E)]

 

 

+[1+ηcot⁡(η−B)]⋅gFΛη[Λ2−2+Λcot⁡(Λ−E)+Λ2cot⁡2(Λ−E)]

 

 

−[1−ηcot⁡(η−B)][Λ2[1−Λcot⁡(Λ−E)]−a0Λ4b0]}

⇒(Λ42b0)⋅  LAWE

=

gF2[3−Λ2−(Λ+Λ3)cot⁡(Λ−E)−Λ2cot⁡2(Λ−E)−Λ3cot⁡3(Λ−E)]

 

 

+gFΛη[Λ2−2+Λcot⁡(Λ−E)+Λ2cot⁡2(Λ−E)]−(Λη)2[1−Λcot⁡(Λ−E)−a0Λ2b0]

 

 

+[ηcot⁡(η−B)]{gFΛη[Λ2−2+Λcot⁡(Λ−E)+Λ2cot⁡2(Λ−E)]+(Λη)2[1−Λcot⁡(Λ−E)−a0Λ2b0]}


Fourth Attempt[edit]

XXXX[edit]

If we assume that, αe=(3−4/2)=1 and σc2=0, then the relevant envelope LAWE is,

0

=

d2xdη2+{4−2Q}1η⋅dxdη−[2Q]xη2,

where,

Q≡−dln⁡ϕdln⁡η

=

[1−ηcot⁡(η−B0)].


Let's work through the analytic derivatives again. Keeping in mind that,

ddη[cot⁡(η−B)]

=

−[1+cot2(η−B)];

and that the,

Precise Solution to the Polytropic LAWE

xP

=

b(n−1)2n[1+(n−3n−1)(1ηϕn)dϕdη]

 

=

−b[(1ηϕ)dϕdη]

 

=

bη2[−dln⁡ϕdln⁡η]

 

=

bQη2

⇒xP

=

bη2[1−ηcot⁡(η−B0)].

As we have already tried once, above, let's try a more general form of this expression, namely,

xQ

=

A+C(η−F)2[1−(η−D)cot⁡(η−B)].

Hence,

dxQdη

=

[1−(η−D)cot⁡(η−B)]ddη[C(η−F)2]−C(η−F)2ddη[(η−D)cot⁡(η−B)]

 

=

[1−(η−D)cot⁡(η−B)][−2C(η−F)3]−C(η−F)2[cot⁡(η−B)]+C(η−D)(η−F)2[1+cot⁡2(η−B)]

 

=

C(η−F)3{−2+2(η−D)cot⁡(η−B)−(η−F)[cot⁡(η−B)]+(η−D)(η−F)[1+cot⁡2(η−B)]}

 

=

C(η−F)3{[(η−D)(η−F)−2]+(η−2D+F)cot⁡(η−B)+(η−D)(η−F)cot⁡2(η−B)}.

And,

d2xQdη2

=

{[(η−D)(η−F)−2]+(η−2D+F)cot⁡(η−B)+(η−D)(η−F)cot⁡2(η−B)}ddη[C(η−F)3]

 

 

+C(η−F)3⋅ddη{[(η−D)(η−F)−2]+(η−2D+F)cot⁡(η−B)+(η−D)(η−F)cot⁡2(η−B)}

 

=

{[(η−D)(η−F)−2]+(η−2D+F)cot⁡(η−B)+(η−D)(η−F)cot⁡2(η−B)}[−3C(η−F)4]

 

 

+C(η−F)3{[2η−(D+F)]+cot⁡(η−B)−(η−2D+F)[1+cot⁡2(η−B)]+[2η−(D+F)]cot⁡2(η−B)−2[η2−η(D+F)+DF]cot⁡(η−B)[1+cot⁡2(η−B)]}

 

=

C(η−F)4{−3[(η−D)(η−F)−2]−3(η−2D+F)cot⁡(η−B)−3(η−D)(η−F)cot⁡2(η−B)}

 

 

+C(η−F)3{[2η−(D+F)]−(η−2D+F)+cot⁡(η−B)−(η−2D+F)cot⁡2(η−B)+[2η−(D+F)]cot⁡2(η−B)−2[η2−η(D+F)+DF]cot⁡(η−B)−2[η2−η(D+F)+DF]cot⁡3(η−B)}

YYYY[edit]

And,

d2xQdη2

=

{[(η−D)(η−F)−2]+(η−2D+F)cot⁡(η−B)+(η−D)(η−F)cot⁡2(η−B)}ddη[C(η−F)3]

 

 

+C(η−F)3⋅ddη{[(η−D)(η−F)−2]+(η−2D+F)cot⁡(η−B)+(η−D)(η−F)cot⁡2(η−B)}

 

=

{[(η−D)(η−F)−2]+(η−2D+F)cot⁡(η−B)+(η−D)(η−F)cot⁡2(η−B)}[−3C(η−F)4]

 

 

+C(η−F)3⋅{ddη[(η−2D+F)cot⁡(η−B)]+ddη[(η−D)(η−F)cot⁡2(η−B)]}

 

=

C(η−F)4{−3[(η−D)(η−F)−2]−3(η−2D+F)cot⁡(η−B)−3(η−D)(η−F)cot⁡2(η−B)

 

 

+(η−F)ddη[(η−2D+F)cot⁡(η−B)]+(η−F)ddη[(η−D)(η−F)cot⁡2(η−B)]}

 

=

C(η−F)4{−3[(η−D)(η−F)−2]−3(η−2D+F)cot⁡(η−B)−3(η−D)(η−F)cot⁡2(η−B)

 

 

+(η−F)cot⁡(η−B)ddη[(η−2D+F)]+(η−F)(η−2D+F)ddη[cot⁡(η−B)]

 

 

+(η−F)cot2(η−B)ddη[η2−η(D+F)+DF]+(η−F)(η−D)(η−F)ddη[cot2(η−B)]}

 

=

C(η−F)4{−3[(η−D)(η−F)−2]−3(η−2D+F)cot⁡(η−B)−3(η−D)(η−F)cot⁡2(η−B)

 

 

+(η−F)cot⁡(η−B)−(η−F)(η−2D+F)[1+cot⁡2(η−B)]

 

 

+(η−F)cot2(η−B)[2η−(D+F)]−2(η−F)(η−D)(η−F)cot⁡(η−B)[1+cot⁡2(η−B)]}

 

=

C(η−F)4{−3[(η−D)(η−F)−2]−(η−F)(η−2D+F)

 

 

+[(η−F)−3(η−2D+F)−2(η−F)(η−D)(η−F)]cot⁡(η−B)

 

 

+[(η−F)[2η−(D+F)]−3(η−D)(η−F)−2(η−F)(η−D)(η−F)cot⁡(η−B)−(η−F)(η−2D+F)]cot⁡2(η−B)}

So the envelope LAWE becomes,

(η−F)4C⋅LAWE

=

(η−F)4C⋅d2xQdη2+(η−F)4C[1+ηcot⁡(η−B0)]2η⋅dxQdη−(η−F)4C[1−ηcot⁡(η−B0)]2xQη2

 

=

{−3[(η−D)(η−F)−2]−(η−F)(η−2D+F)+[(η−F)−3(η−2D+F)−2(η−F)(η−D)(η−F)]cot⁡(η−B)

 

 

+[(η−F)[2η−(D+F)]−3(η−D)(η−F)−2(η−F)(η−D)(η−F)cot⁡(η−B)−(η−F)(η−2D+F)]cot⁡2(η−B)}

 

 

+(η−F)[1+ηcot⁡(η−B0)]2η{[(η−D)(η−F)−2]+(η−2D+F)cot⁡(η−B)+(η−D)(η−F)cot⁡2(η−B)}

 

 

−(η−F)4C[1−ηcot⁡(η−B0)]2η2{A+C(η−F)2[1−(η−D)cot⁡(η−B)]}

 

=

−3[(η−D)(η−F)−2]−(η−F)(η−2D+F)+[(η−F)−3(η−2D+F)−2(η−F)(η−D)(η−F)]cot⁡(η−B)

 

 

+(η−F)[1+ηcot⁡(η−B0)]2η{[(η−D)(η−F)−2]+(η−2D+F)cot⁡(η−B)}

 

 

+[(η−F)[2η−(D+F)]−3(η−D)(η−F)−2(η−F)(η−D)(η−F)cot⁡(η−B)−(η−F)(η−2D+F)]cot⁡2(η−B)

 

 

+(η−F)[1+ηcot⁡(η−B0)]2η[(η−D)(η−F)cot⁡2(η−B)]−(η−F)2[1−ηcot⁡(η−B0)]2η2[1−(η−D)cot⁡(η−B)]

 

 

−(η−F)4C[1−ηcot⁡(η−B0)]2Aη2.

What does this reduce to if A=D=F=0.

η4C⋅LAWE

=

−3[(η)(η)−2]−(η)(η)+[(η)−3(η)−2(η)(η)(η)]cot⁡(η−B)

 

 

+(η)[1+ηcot⁡(η−B0)]2η{[(η)(η)−2]+(η)cot⁡(η−B)}

 

 

+[(η)[2η]−3(η)(η)−2(η)(η)(η)cot⁡(η−B)−(η−)(η)]cot⁡2(η−B)

 

 

+(η)[1+ηcot⁡(η−B0)]2η[(η)(η)cot⁡2(η−B)]−(η)2[1−ηcot⁡(η−B0)]2η2[1−(η)cot⁡(η−B)]

 

 

−(η)4C[1−ηcot⁡(η−B0)]2Aη2.

 

=

6−4η2−2(η+η3)cot⁡(η−B)+2[1+ηcot⁡(η−B0)][η2−2+ηcot⁡(η−B)]−2[η2+η3cot⁡(η−B)]cot⁡2(η−B)

 

 

+2[1+ηcot⁡(η−B0)][η2cot⁡2(η−B)]−2[1−ηcot⁡(η−B0)][1−ηcot⁡(η−B)]−2Aη2C[1−ηcot⁡(η−B0)]

 

=

6−4η2−2(η+η3)cot⁡(η−B)+2η2−4+2ηcot⁡(η−B)+2η3cot⁡(η−B0)−4ηcot⁡(η−B0)+2η2cot⁡(η−B0)cot⁡(η−B)−2η2cot⁡2(η−B)−2η3cot⁡3(η−B)

 

 

+2η2cot2(η−B)+2η3cot⁡(η−B0)cot⁡2(η−B)−2+4ηcot⁡(η−B0)−2η2cot⁡2(η−B0)−2Aη2C[1−ηcot⁡(η−B0)]

 

=

−2η2−2η3[cot⁡(η−B)+cot⁡3(η−B)]+cot⁡(η−B0)[2η3+2η2cot⁡(η−B)+2η3cot⁡2(η−B)]−2η2cot⁡2(η−B0)−2Aη2C[1−ηcot⁡(η−B0)]

 

=

−2η2+2η3[cot⁡(η−B0)−cot⁡(η−B)][1+cot⁡2(η−B)]+2η2cot⁡(η−B0)[cot⁡(η−B)−cot⁡(η−B0)]−2Aη2C[1−ηcot⁡(η−B0)].

See Also[edit]

  • In an accompanying Chapter within our "Ramblings" Appendix, we have played with the adiabatic wave equation for polytropes, examining its form when the primary perturbation variable is an enthalpy-like quantity, rather than the radial displacement of a spherical mass shell. This was done in an effort to mimic the approach that has been taken in studies of the stability of Papaloizou-Pringle tori.
  • n=32 … D. Lucas (1953, Bul. Soc. Roy. Sci. Liege, 25, 585) … Citation obtained from the Prasad & Gurm (1961) article.
Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |