SSC/Stability/n5PolytropeLAWE

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Radial Oscillations of n = 5 Polytropic Spheres[edit]

Background[edit]

General Form of the LAWE for Spherical Polytropes[edit]

In an accompanying discussion, we derived the so-called,

Adiabatic Wave (or Radial Pulsation) Equation

d2xdr02+[4r0(g0ρ0P0)]dxdr0+(ρ0γgP0)[ω2+(43γg)g0r0]x=0

whose solution gives eigenfunctions that describe various radial modes of oscillation in spherically symmetric, self-gravitating fluid configurations. Because this widely used form of the radial pulsation equation is not dimensionless but, rather, has units of inverse length-squared, we have found it useful to also recast it in the following dimensionless form:

d2xdχ02+[4χ0(ρ0ρc)(P0Pc)1(g0gSSC)]dxdχ0+(ρ0ρc)(P0Pc)1(1γg)[τSSC2ω2+(43γg)(g0gSSC)1χ0]x=0,

where,

gSSCPcRρc,       and       τSSC[R2ρcPc]1/2.

In a separate discussion, we showed that specifically for isolated, polytropic configurations, this linear adiabatic wave equation (LAWE) can be rewritten as,

0

=

d2xdξ2+[4(n+1)V(ξ)ξ]dxdξ+[ω2γgθ(n+14πGρc)(34γg)(n+1)V(x)ξ2]x

 

=

d2xdξ2+[4ξ(n+1)θ(dθdξ)]dxdξ+(n+1)θ[σc26γgαξ(dθdξ)]x,

where we have adopted the dimensionless frequency notation,

σc2

3ω22πGρc.

Specifically for n=5 Configurations[edit]

Here we focus on an analysis of the specific case of isolated, n=5 polytropic configurations, whose unperturbed equilibrium structure can be prescribed in terms of analytic functions. Our hope — as yet unfulfilled — is that we can discover an analytically prescribed eigenvector solution to the governing LAWE.

From our discussion of the equilibrium structure of isolated, n=5 polytropes, we know that,

θ

=

(1+ξ23)1/2=31/2(3+ξ2)1/2.

Hence, we know as well that,

dθdξ

=

ξ3(1+ξ23)3/2=31/2ξ(3+ξ2)3/2.

The LAWE therefore becomes,

0

=

d2xdξ2+[4ξ(n+1)θ(dθdξ)]dxdξ+(n+1)θ[σc26γgαξ(dθdξ)]x

 

=

d2xdξ2+[4ξ6θ(dθdξ)]dxdξ+[σc2γg1θ6αξ1θ(dθdξ)]x

 

=

d2xdξ2+[46ξ2(3+ξ2)]1ξdxdξ+[σc231/2γg(3+ξ2)1/26α(3+ξ2))]x.

Or,

LAWE for n=5 Polytropes

0

=

(3+ξ2)d2xdξ2+[122ξ2]1ξdxdξ+[σc231/2γg(3+ξ2)3/26α]x

Numerical Integration of LAWE[edit]

By numerically integrating the above LAWE using the algorithm outlined in a separate chapter, we have examined the properties of the displacement function that describes radial modes of oscillation in pressure-truncated, n = 5, polytropic configurations. Our brief description, here, of these modes parallels the more detailed description of radial oscillation modes in truncated isothermal spheres that has been presented in a separate chapter.

The animation sequence that appears in the right panel of Composite Display 1 shows how our numerically derived displacement function, x(ξ), varies with radius — from the center of the n=5 polytropic sphere, out to ξ=10 — for sixteen different values of the square of the eigenfrequency, σc2, as denoted at the top of each animation frame. The segment of the x(ξ) curve that has been drawn in blue identifies the eigenfunction that corresponds to the specified value of the eigenfrequency. In each frame, the radial location at which the blue segment terminates simultaneously identifies: (a) the radius at which the logarithmic derivative of the displacement function, dlnx/dlnξ, is negative three; and (b) the radius, ξ~, at which the n = 5 polytropic configuration has been truncated. As displayed here, in every frame, the x(ξ) function has been normalized such that the displacement amplitude is unity at the truncated configuration's surface.

The left panel of Composite Display 1 is also animated and has been provided in support of the animation on the right. Specifically, the number written at the top of each left-panel frame quantitatively identifies the radial location, ξ~, of the surface of the relevant truncated polytropic configuration; and, on each frame, "×" marks the location of that truncated configuration on the mass-radius equilibrium sequence.

Composite Display 1:   Numerically Generated Fundamental-Mode Eigenvectors

n5 Truncated movie

Excel File:

file = Dropbox/WorkFolder/Wiki edits/LinearPerturbation/n5Eigenvectors/n5TruncatedSphere.xlsx --- worksheet = OursPt1
file = Dropbox/WorkFolder/Wiki edits/LinearPerturbation/n5Eigenvectors/n5TruncatedSphere.xlsx --- worksheet = OursPt1

Movie File:

file = Dropbox/WorkFolder/Wiki edits/EmbeddedPolytropes/n5movie/ --- worksheet = n5Truncated2.gif
file = Dropbox/WorkFolder/Wiki edits/EmbeddedPolytropes/n5movie/ --- worksheet = n5Truncated2.gif

Each full loop through the left-panel animation sequence can be viewed as evolution along the equilibrium sequence from ξ~=0.75 to ξ~=5, then back again. During this evolution, the "×" marker moves through both turning points along the sequence: the maximum radius configuration — at ξ~=3 — and the maximum mass configuration — at ξ~=3. Notice that σc2 is positive for all models having ξ~<3 while it is negative for all models having ξ~>3. Hence, models having ξ~>3 are dynamically unstable and, as best we have been able to determine via these numerical integrations, the transition from stable to unstable models — that is, the marginally unstable model — occurs at ξ~=3. (Via an analytic analysis, we prove, below, that this association is precise.) For emphasis, the "×" marker (left panel) and the numerical value recorded for σc2 (right panel) have been colored red for models that are not stable.

Search for Analytic Solutions to the LAWE[edit]

Eureka Moment[edit]

Note from J. E. Tohline on 3/6/2017:  Yesterday evening, after I finished putting together the above animation sequence using an Excel workbook, I noticed that the eigenfunction of the fundamental mode for the marginally unstable model (σc2=0) resembles a parabola. In an effort to see how well a parabola fits at least the central portion of this eigenfunction, I returned to my Excel spreedsheet and, in a brute-force manner, began to search for the pair of coefficients that would provide a best fit. What I discovered was that a parabola with the following formula fits perfectly!

Fundamental Mode Eigenfunction
when σc2=0 and γ=6/5α=1/3

x=x0[1ξ215]

For the specific normalization used in the above animation sequence, x0=52. Let's demonstrate that this eigenvector provides a solution to the LAWE for n=5 polytropes; for simplicity, we will set x0=1:

dxdξ=2ξ15;

      and      

d2xdξ2=215.

(3+ξ2)d2xdξ2+[122ξ2]1ξdxdξ+[σc231/2γg0(3+ξ2)3/2+2]x

=

215(3+ξ2)215[122ξ2]+2[1ξ215]

 

=

(6152415+2)+ξ2(215+415215)

 

=

0.

Q. E. D.  I don't think that anyone has previously appreciated that the LAWE in this case admits to an analytic eigenvector solution.

Now, let's see how the boundary condition comes into play. We see that the logarithmic derivative of the parabolic eigenfunction is,

dlnxdlnξ

=

ξxdxdξ

 

=

2ξ215[1ξ215]1

 

=

2ξ2(15ξ2).

We desire a surface boundary condition that gives, dlnx/dlnξ=3. This will only happen when,

2ξ2(15ξ2)

=

3

2ξ2

=

3(15ξ2)

ξ

=

3.

Hence, although the parabolic eigenfunction provides an accurate solution to the n=5 LAWE throughout the entire configuration — that is, for all ξ — the desired surface boundary condition will only be satisfied if the polytrope is truncated at ξsurf=3. The parabolic eigenfunction is therefore only physically relevant to the model that sits at the point along the equilibrium sequence that is associated with the Pmax turning point.


Let's express the parabolic displacement function, x, as a function of the Lagrangian mass coordinate, instead of as a function of ξ. Drawing upon our accompanying discussion where we have used ξ~ to denote the truncation edge, we know that,

rξ(ξ)

=

ξ{[4π253]1/2ξ~6(1+ξ~23)3}.

and that,

rξ(mξ)

=

r~edge[32mξ2/3C~3mξ2/3]1/2,

where,

C~

32ξ~2(1+ξ~23).

r~edge

[π233]1/2ξ~6(1+ξ~23)3.

By equating rξ(ξ) with rξ(mξ), we find,

ξ{[4π253]1/2ξ~6(1+ξ~23)3}

=

[π233]1/2ξ~6(1+ξ~23)3[32mξ2/3C~3mξ2/3]1/2

ξ

=

[32mξ2/3C~3mξ2/3]1/2.

This means that,

x

=

x0{1115[32mξ2/3C~3mξ2/3]};

and, specifically for the critical case of ξ~=3, in which case, C~=4,

x

=

x0{1115[32mξ2/343mξ2/3]}.



Material that appears after this point in our presentation is under development and therefore
may contain incorrect mathematical equations and/or physical misinterpretations.
|   Go Home   |


Setup Using Lagrangian Radial Coordinate[edit]

Individual Terms[edit]

From our accompanying discussion, we have, for pressure-truncated, n=5 polytropic spheres

ReqRnorm

=

[4π(n+1)n]1/(n3)ξ~(ξ~2θ~)(1n)/(n3)

 

=

[4π2535]1/2ξ~(ξ~2θ~)2,

which matches the expression derived in an ASIDE box found with our introduction of the Lane-Emden equation, and

PePnorm

=

[(n+1)34π](n+1)/(n3)θ~nn+1(ξ~2θ~)2(n+1)/(n3)

 

=

[23334π]3θ~6(ξ~2θ~)6,

where,

Rnorm

[(GK)nMtotn1]1/(n3)=(GK)5/2Mtot2,

Pnorm

[K4nG3(n+1)Mtot2(n+1)]1/(n3)=K10G9Mtot6,

and, from our more detailed analysis,

θ~5=31/2(3+ξ~2)1/2

        and        

(ξ~2θ~5')=31/2ξ~3(3+ξ~2)3/2.

Hence,

ReqRnorm

=

[4π2535]1/2ξ~[31/2ξ~3(3+ξ~2)3/2]2

 

=

[4π2535]1/2ξ~[31ξ~6(3+ξ~2)3]

 

=

[4π2537]1/2ξ~5(3+ξ~2)3,

PePnorm

=

[23334π]3[31/2(3+ξ~2)1/2]6[31/2ξ~3(3+ξ~2)3/2]6

 

=

[23334π]3[33(3+ξ~2)3][33ξ~18(3+ξ~2)9]

 

=

[23354π]3ξ~18(3+ξ~2)12.

Now, given that the structural form-factors for n=5 configurations are,

𝔣M

=

(1+2)3/2=33/2(3+ξ~2)3/2

𝔣W

=

5245[(48321)(1+2)3+tan1()]

𝔣A

=

3233[tan1()+(21)(1+2)2],

we understand that the central density is,

ρc=ρ¯𝔣~M

=

[33/2(3+ξ~2)3/2]1[3Mtot4πReq3]

 

=

(34π)[25364π]3/2(3+ξ~2)3/2Mtot[Rnormξ~5(3+ξ~2)3]3

 

=

[25320π5]1/2ξ~15(3+ξ~2)15/2MtotRnorm3

 

=

[25320π5]1/2[ξ~(3+ξ~2)1/2]15Mtot5(GK)15/2

 

=

[234π]5/2[ξ~(3+ξ~2)1/2]15(K3G3Mtot2)5/2.

Now let's derive the prescription for the Lagrangian radial coordinate in the context of pressure-truncated, n=5 polytropes.

r0a5ξ

=

[3K2πG]1/2ρc2/5ξ

 

=

[3K2πG]1/2ξ{[234π]5/2[ξ~(3+ξ~2)1/2]15(K3G3Mtot2)5/2}2/5

 

=

[3K2πG]1/2[π234](G3Mtot2K3)[(3+ξ~2)ξ~2]3ξ

 

=

Rnorm[π2337]1/2[(3+ξ~2)ξ~2]3ξ

Also,

m0M(r0)

=

[4πan3ρc(ξ2dθdξ)],

 

=

22π{Rnorm[π2337]1/2ξ~6(3+ξ~2)3}3{[234π]5/2[ξ~(3+ξ~2)1/2]15(K3G3Mtot2)5/2}{31/2ξ3(3+ξ2)3/2}

 

=

31/2[24π2]1/2[π329321]1/2[25320π5]1/2{ξ~6(3+ξ~2)3}3[ξ~(3+ξ~2)1/2]15(K3G3Mtot2)5/2Rnorm3{ξ3(3+ξ2)3/2}

 

=

{ξ~3(3+ξ~2)3/2}Mtot{ξ3(3+ξ2)3/2}.

Hence,

g0=Gm0r02

=

GMtotRnorm2{ξ~3(3+ξ~2)3/2}{ξ3(3+ξ2)3/2}{[π2337]1/2[(3+ξ~2)ξ~2]3ξ}2

 

=

GMtotRnorm2[2337π][ξ~(3+ξ~2)1/2]9ξ(3+ξ2)3/2;

g0r0

=

GMtotRnorm3[2337π]{ξ~9(3+ξ~2)9/2}{[π2337]1/2[(3+ξ~2)ξ~2]3ξ}1ξ(3+ξ2)3/2

 

=

GMtotRnorm3[2337π]3/2[ξ~(3+ξ~2)1/2]15(3+ξ2)3/2;


ρ0P0=ρ0Kρ01+1/n

=

[K5ρcθ5]1/5

 

=

θ1{K5[234π]5/2[ξ~(3+ξ~2)1/2]15(K3G3Mtot2)5/2}1/5

 

=

[31(3+ξ2)]1/2{[π234]1/2[ξ~3(3+ξ~2)3/2]3mistake(G3Mtot2K5)1/2}

 

=

(G3Mtot2K5)1/2[π235]1/2[ξ~(3+ξ~2)1/2]9mistake(3+ξ2)1/2;

 

=

[31(3+ξ2)]1/2{[π234]1/2[ξ~3(3+ξ~2)3/2](G3Mtot2K5)1/2}

 

=

(G3Mtot2K5)1/2[π235]1/2[(3+ξ~2)ξ~2]3/2(3+ξ2)1/2

g0ρ0P0

=

(G3Mtot2K5)1/2[π235]1/2[(3+ξ~2)ξ~2]3/2(3+ξ2)1/2

 

 

×(G2Mtot2Rnorm4)1/2[26314π2]1/2[(3+ξ~2)ξ~2]9/2ξ(3+ξ2)3/2

 

=

(G5Mtot4K5)1/2Rnorm2[ξ~2(3+ξ~2)]3[2539π]1/2ξ(3+ξ2)1

 

=

(K5G5Mtot4)1/2[ξ~2(3+ξ~2)]3[2539π]1/2ξ(3+ξ2)1.

The Wave Equation[edit]

Starting from our Key Adiabatic Wave Equation[edit]

The adiabatic wave equation therefore becomes,

0

=

d2xdr02+[4r0(g0ρ0P0)]dxdr0+(ρ0γgP0)[ω2+(43γg)g0r0]x

 

=

d2xdr02+1Rnorm{[2737π]1/2[ξ~2(3+ξ~2)]31ξ[ξ~2(3+ξ~2)]3[2539π]1/2ξ(3+ξ2)1}dxdr0

 

 

+(43γg)γgRnorm2[π235]1/2[ξ~2(3+ξ~2)]3/2(3+ξ2)1/2{Rnorm3GMtot[ω2(43γg)]+[2337π]3/2[ξ~2(3+ξ~2)]15/2(3+ξ2)3/2}x

 

=

d2xdr02+1Rnorm[2337π]1/2[ξ~2(3+ξ~2)]3[4ξ6ξ(3+ξ2)]dxdr0

 

 

+6(43γg)γgRnorm2(3+ξ2)1/2[2337π][ξ~2(3+ξ~2)]6{Rnorm3GMtot[ω2(43γg)][2337π]3/2[ξ~2(3+ξ~2)]15/2+(3+ξ2)3/2}x

 

=

d2xdr02+1R*[ξ~2(3+ξ~2)]3[4ξ6ξ(3+ξ2)]dxdr0+6γgR*2[ξ~2(3+ξ~2)]6{ω2R*3GMtot[ξ~2(3+ξ~2)]15/2(3+ξ2)1/2+(43γg)(3+ξ2)}x

where,

R*Rnorm[π2337]1/2.

Recognizing that,

r0

=

R*[(3+ξ~2)ξ~2]3ξ,

we can write,

0

=

1R*2[ξ~2(3+ξ~2)]6{d2xdξ2+[4ξ6ξ(3+ξ2)]dxdξ+6γg[σ2(3+ξ2)1/2+(43γg)(3+ξ2)]x},

where,

σ2

ω2R*3GMtot(3+ξ~2ξ~2)15/2=σc2233/2.

Finally, if — because we are specifically considering the case of n=5 — we set γg=1+1/n=6/5, we have,

0

=

d2xdξ2+[4ξ6ξ(3+ξ2)]dxdξ+[5σc2233/2(3+ξ2)1/2+2(3+ξ2)]x

 

=

1(3+ξ2){(3+ξ2)d2xdξ2+[2(6ξ2)ξ]dxdξ+[5σc2233/2(3+ξ2)3/2+2]x},

which matches exactly the form of the LAWE derived above, if in that expression, γg is also forced to align with our specification of the polytropic index, that is, if γg=(n+1)/n=6/5 and, in turn, α=(34/γ)=1/3.


Starting from the HRW66 Radial Pulsation Equation[edit]

More directly, if we begin with the HRW66 radial pulsation equation that is already tuned to polytropic configurations, the wave equation appropriate to n=5 polytropes is,

0

=

d2Xdξ2+[4ξ6(θ5')θ5]dXdξ+5(θ5')6θ5ξ[ξ(s')2θ5'+125]X

 

=

d2Xdξ2+[4ξ6ξ(3+ξ2)]dXdξ+1(3+ξ2)[5(s')2(3+ξ2)3/2233/2+2]X

 

=

1(3+ξ2){(3+ξ2)d2Xdξ2+[2(6ξ2)ξ]dXdξ+[5(s')2233/2(3+ξ2)3/2+2]X},

which is identical to the brute-force derivation just presented, allowing for the mapping,

σ2(s')2233/2.

Finally, remembering that the HRW66 dimensionless frequency definition is,

(s')2

=

ω2[n+14πGρc],

we recognize that, specifically for the case of n=5, we can make the substitution, (s')2σc2, in which case the LAWE becomes,

0

=

1(3+ξ2){(3+ξ2)d2Xdξ2+[2(6ξ2)ξ]dXdξ+[5σc2233/2(3+ξ2)3/2+2]X},

which matches exactly the form of the LAWE derived above, if in that expression, γg is also forced to align with our specification of the polytropic index, that is, if γg=(n+1)/n=6/5 and, in turn, α=(34/γ)=1/3.

New Independent Variable[edit]

Guided by our conjecture regarding the proper shape of the radial eigenfunction, let's switch the dependent variable to,

u1+3ξ2

               

3+ξ2=3u(u1),

        and        

ξ=31/2(u1)1/2.

This implies that,

ddξ

23(u1)3/2ddu,

and,

d2dξ2

43(u1)3d2du2+2(u1)2ddu.

Hence, the governing wave equation becomes,

0

=

(3+ξ2)d2xdξ2+[2(6ξ2)ξ]dxdξ+[5σ2(3+ξ2)3/2+2]x

 

=

3u(u1)[43(u1)3d2xdu2+2(u1)2dxdu]+4(2u3)(u1)dxdu+{5σ2[3u(u1)]3/2+2}x

 

=

4u(u1)2d2xdu2+(14u12)(u1)dxdu+{5σ2[3u(u1)]3/2+2}x.


Material that appears after this point in our presentation is under development and therefore
may contain incorrect mathematical equations and/or physical misinterpretations.
|   Go Home   |



If we assume that σ2=0, then the governing relation is,

0

=

4u(u1)2d2xdu2+(14u12)(u1)dxdu+2x.

Now, again, guided by our conjecture, let's guess an eigenfunction of the form:

First Guess (n5)[edit]

x

=

A3(u1)1/2(Au1)1/2,

in which case,

dxdu

=

A32[(u1)1/2(Au1)1/2A(u1)1/2(Au1)3/2]

 

=

[A3(A1)2](u1)1/2(Au1)3/2;

d2xdu2

=

[A3(A1)2]{12(u1)3/2(Au1)3/23A2(u1)1/2(Au1)5/2}

 

=

12[A3(A1)2](u1)3/2(Au1)5/2[(Au1)+3A(u1)]

 

=

[A3(A1)4](u1)3/2(Au1)5/2[(3A+1)4Au].


So the governing relation becomes:

0

=

4u(u1)2{[A3(A1)4](u1)3/2(Au1)5/2[(3A+1)4Au]}

 

 

+(14u12)(u1){[A3(A1)2](u1)1/2(Au1)3/2}+2A3(u1)1/2(Au1)1/2

 

=

u(u1)1/2A3(A1)(Au1)5/2[(3A+1)4Au]

 

 

+(7u6)(u1)1/2A3(A1)(Au1)3/2+2A3(u1)1/2(Au1)1/2

 

=

(u1)1/2{uA3(A1)(Au1)5/2[(3A+1)4Au]+(7u6)A3(A1)(Au1)3/2+2A3(Au1)1/2}

 

=

A3(u1)1/2(Au1)5/2{u(A1)[(3A+1)4Au]+(7u6)(A1)(Au1)+2(Au1)2}

 

=

A3(u1)1/2(Au1)5/2{4u2A(A1)+u(A1)(3A+1)+(7u6)[A(A1)u+1A]+2(A2u22Au+1)}

 

=

A3(u1)1/2(Au1)5/2{u2[4A(A1)+7A(A1)+2A2]+u[(A1)(3A+1)7(A1)6A(A1)4A]+2(3A2)}

 

=

A3(u1)1/2(Au1)5/2{Au2[5A3]+u[3A22A17A+76A2+6A4A]+2(3A2)}.

 

=

A3(u1)1/2(Au1)5/2{Au2[5A3]+u[3A27A+6]+2(3A2)}.

Second Guess (n5)[edit]

x

=

(u1)b/2(Au1)a/2,

in which case,

dxdu

=

b2(u1)b/21(Au1)a/2aA2(u1)b/2(Au1)a/21

 

=

x[b2(u1)1aA2(Au1)1]

(u1)xdxdu

=

(Au1)1[b2(Au1)aA2(u1)]

 

=

12(Au1)[b(Au1)aA(u1)]

 

=

12(Au1)[(aAb)+A(ba)u];

and,

d2xdu2

=

[b2(u1)1aA2(Au1)1]dxdu+xddu[b2(u1)1aA2(Au1)1]

 

=

x[b2(u1)1aA2(Au1)1]2+x[b2(u1)2+aA22(Au1)2]

 

=

x4(u1)2(Au1)2{[b(Au1)aA(u1)]2+[2aA2(u1)22b(Au1)2]}

(1u)2xd2xdu2

=

14(Au1)2{[b(Au1)aA(u1)]2+[2aA2(u1)22b(Au1)2]}

Hence, the governing wave equation becomes,

0

=

2u{(u1)2xd2xdu2}+(7u6){(u1)xdxdu}+1

 

=

2u4(Au1)2{[(aAb)+A(ba)u]2+[2aA2(u1)22b(Au1)2]}

 

 

+(7u6)2(Au1)[(aAb)+A(ba)u]+1

 

=

14(Au1)2{2u[(aAb)2+2(aAb)A(ba)u+A2(ba)2u2]+2u[2aA2(u22u+1)2b(A2u22Au+1)]

 

 

+2(Au1)(7u6)[(aAb)+A(ba)u]+4(Au1)2}

 

=

14(Au1)2{2u[(aAb)2+2(aAb)A(ba)u+A2(ba)2u2]+2u[2A2(ab)u2+4A(baA)u+2(aA2b)]

 

 

+2[7Au2(6A+7)u+6][(aAb)+A(ba)u]+(4A2u28Au+4)}

If b=a,

0

=

2u[(aAb)2]+2u[4A(baA)u+2(aA2b)]

 

 

+2[7Au2(6A+7)u+6][(aAb)]+(4A2u28Au+4)

 

=

2a2u(A1)2+2au[4A(1A)u+2(A21)]

 

 

+2a(A1)[7Au2(6A+7)u+6]+(4A2u28Au+4)

 

=

2Au2[4a(1A)+7a(A1)+2A]+2u[a2(A1)2+2a(A21)a(A1)(6A+7)4A]+4[3a(A1)+1]

This should then match the "first guess" algebraic condition if we set a=1. Let's see.

0

=

2Au2[4(1A)+7(A1)+2A]+2u[(A1)2+2(A21)(A1)(6A+7)4A]+4[3(A1)+1]

 

=

2Au2[44A+7A7+2A]+2u[(A22A+1)+2A22+(1A)(6A+7)4A]+4[3A2]

 

=

2Au2[5A3]+2u[3A27A+6]+4[3A2].

And we see that this expression does match the one derived earlier.

Going back a bit, before setting a=1, we have the expression:


0

=

2Au2[4a(1A)+7a(A1)+2A]+2u[a2(A1)2+2a(A21)a(A1)(6A+7)4A]+4[3a(A1)+1]

 

=

2Au2[3aA3a+2A]+2u[a2(A1)2+2a(A21)a(6A2+A7)4A]+4[3a(A1)+1]

 

=

2Au2[3a(A1)+2A]+2u[a2(A1)2+a(4A2A+5)4A]+4[3a(A1)+1].

Now, in order for all three expressions inside the square-bracket pairs to be zero, we need, first,

3a(A1)+2A

=

0

a

=

2A3(1A);

and, third, by simple visual comparison with the first expression,

3a(A1)+1

=

3a(A1)+2A

A

=

12

a

=

23;

which forces the second expression to the value,

a2(A1)2+a(4A2A+5)4A

=

(23)2(12)2+23[112+5]2

 

=

19+732

 

=

49,

which is not zero. Hence our pair of unknown parameters — a and A — do not simultaneously satisfy all three conditions. (Not really a surprise.)

Setup Using Lagrangian Mass Coordinate[edit]

Alternative Terms[edit]

Let's change the independent coordinate from r0 to m0. In particular, the derivative operation will change as follows:

ddr0

(dm0dr0)ddm0=(dm0dξdξdr0)ddm0,

so what is the expression for the leading coefficient? From above, we have,

r0

=

R*[(3+ξ~2)ξ~2]3ξ

ξ

=

1R*[ξ~2(3+ξ~2)]3r0.

Also, from above, we know that,

m0

=

Mtot[(3+ξ~2)ξ~2]3/2{ξ3(3+ξ2)3/2}

dm0dξ

=

Mtot[(3+ξ~2)ξ~2]3/2{3ξ2(3+ξ2)3/23ξ4(3+ξ2)5/2}

 

=

Mtot[(3+ξ~2)ξ~2]3/23ξ2(3+ξ2)5/2{(3+ξ2)ξ2}

 

=

Mtot[(3+ξ~2)ξ~2]3/232ξ2(3+ξ2)5/2

dm0dr0

=

Mtot[(3+ξ~2)ξ~2]3/232ξ2(3+ξ2)5/21R*[ξ~2(3+ξ~2)]3

 

=

MtotR*[ξ~2(3+ξ~2)]3/232ξ2(3+ξ2)5/2.

To simplify expressions, let's borrow from an accompanying derivation and define,

C~32ξ~2(1+ξ~23)=3[(3+ξ~2)ξ~2].

Then we have,

m0Mtot

=

[C~3]3/2[ξ2(3+ξ2)]3/2

[3C~][m0Mtot]2/3

=

ξ2(3+ξ2)

(3+ξ2)[3C~][m0Mtot]2/3

=

ξ2

3m*

=

ξ2(1m*)

ξ2

=

3m*(1m*),

where,

m*[3C~][m0Mtot]2/3.

In summary:

ξ2(3+ξ2)=m*;

      while,      

ξ~2(3+ξ~2)=3C~;

r0

=

R*[(3+ξ~2)ξ~2]3ξ=R*(C~3)3[3m*(1m*)]1/2;

g0ρ0P0

=

6R*[ξ~2(3+ξ~2)]9ξ(3+ξ2)=6R*[3C~]9m*ξ=6R*[3C~]9m*[(1m*)3m*]1/2;

g0r0

=

GMtotR*3[ξ~2(3+ξ~2)]15/21ξ3[ξ2(3+ξ2)]3/2=GMtotR*3[3C~]15/2(1m*)3/2;

ρ0γgP0

=

6R*γgGMtot(3C~)9/2[3(1m*)]1/2.

So, the wave equation may be written as,

0

=

d2xdr02+[4r0(g0ρ0P0)]dxdr0+(ρ0γgP0)[ω2+(43γg)g0r0]x

 

=

d2xdr02+{4R*(3C~)3[(1m*)3m*]1/26R*[3C~]9m*[(1m*)3m*]1/2}dxdr0

 

 

+6R*γgGMtot(3C~)9/2[3(1m*)]1/2{ω2+(43γg)GMtotR*3[3C~]15/2(1m*)3/2}x

 

=

d2xdr02+1R*(3C~)3{46[3C~]6m*}[(1m*)3m*]1/2dxdr0

 

 

+6(43γg)γg1R*2(3C~)3[3(1m*)]1/2{σ2+(1m*)3/2}x

 

=

1R*2(3C~)3{R*2(C~3)3d2xdr02+R*[46(3C~)6m*][(1m*)3m*]1/2dxdr0

 

 

+6(43γg)γg[3(1m*)]1/2[σ2+(1m*)3/2]x}

 

=

1R*2(3C~)3[13m*(1m*)]1/2{[3m*(1m*)]1/2R*2(C~3)3d2xdr02+R*[46(3C~)6m*](1m*)dxdr0

 

 

+18(43γg)γgm*1/2[σ2+(1m*)3/2]x},

where,

σ2(43γg)1R*3GMtot[C~3]15/2ω2.

Now, let's look at the differential operators, after defining.

c031/2R*(C~3)3R*=c031/2(C~3)3.

We find,

dr0

=

c0d[m*1/2(1m*)1/2]

 

=

c0[12m*1/2(1m*)1/2+12m*1/2(1m*)3/2]dm*

 

=

c02m*1/2(1m*)3/2dm*

ddr0

=

2c0m*1/2(1m*)3/2ddm*

R*dxdr0

=

231/2(C~3)3m*1/2(1m*)3/2dxdm*.

Also,

d2dr02

=

(2c0)2m*1/2(1m*)3/2ddm*[m*1/2(1m*)3/2ddm*]

 

=

(2c0)2m*(1m*)3d2dm*2+(2c0)2m*1/2(1m*)3/2[12m*1/2(1m*)3/232m*1/2(1m*)1/2]ddm*

 

=

(2c0)2m*(1m*)3d2dm*2+12(2c0)2(1m*)2(14m*)ddm*

R*2(C~3)3d2xdr02

=

[223(C~3)3][m*(1m*)3d2xdm*2+12(1m*)2(14m*)dxdm*]

So, the wave equation becomes,

0

=

1R*2(3C~)3[13m*(1m*)]1/2{[3m*(1m*)]1/2[223(C~3)3][m*(1m*)3d2xdm*2+12(1m*)2(14m*)dxdm*]

 

 

+[46(3C~)6m*](1m*)[231/2(C~3)3m*1/2(1m*)3/2dxdm*]+18(43γg)γgm*1/2[σ2+(1m*)3/2]x}

 

=

1R*2(3C~)6[13m*(1m*)]1/2{[3m*(1m*)]1/2[223][m*(1m*)3d2xdm*2+12(1m*)2(14m*)dxdm*]

 

 

+[46(3C~)6m*](1m*)[231/2m*1/2(1m*)3/2dxdm*]+18(43γg)γg(C~3)3m*1/2[σ2+(1m*)3/2]x}

 

=

23R*2(3C~)6{2m*(1m*)3d2xdm*2+(1m*)2(14m*)dxdm*

 

 

+[46(3C~)6m*](1m*)2dxdm*+9(43γg)γg(C~3)3[3(1m*)]1/2[σ2+(1m*)3/2]x}

 

=

23R*2(3C~)6{2m*(1m*)3d2xdm*2

 

 

+[54m*6(3C~)6m*](1m*)2dxdm*+9(43γg)γg(C~3)3[3(1m*)]1/2[σ2+(1m*)3/2]x}

 

=

23R*2(3C~)6{2m*(1m*)3d2xdm*2+(5𝒜m*)(1m*)2dxdm*+[σ2(1m*)1/2+(1m*)]x},

where,

𝒜

4+6(3C~)6,

35/2(43γg)γg(C~3)3.

Try Again[edit]

This time, let's adopt the notation used in a related chapter in our Ramblings appendix. Specifically, the parametric relationship between mξ and rξ in pressure-truncated, n=5 polytropes is,

mξm0Mtot=Mr(ξ)Mtot

=

(ξξ~)3(3+ξ2)3/2(3+ξ~2)3/2

 

=

[(3+ξ~2)ξ~2]3/2[(3+ξ2)ξ2]3/2,

rξr0Rnorm=(ξξ~)ReqRnorm

=

ξ{[4π253]1/2ξ~6(1+ξ~23)3}

 

=

[π2337]1/2[(3+ξ~2)ξ~2]3ξ.

And we are in the fortunate situation of being able to eliminate ξ to obtain the direct relation,

rξ(mξ)

=

r~edge[32mξ2/3C~3mξ2/3]1/2,

where,

C~

32ξ~2(1+ξ~23)=3[(3+ξ~2)ξ~2],

r~edge

[π233]1/2ξ~6(1+ξ~23)3=[π2337]1/2[C~3]3.

If we furthermore define,

m*3C~mξ2/3,

then,

rξ(m*)

=

31/2r~edge[m*1m*]1/2.

Hence,

dr0Rnorm=drξ

=

31/2r~edge{12(1m*)1/2m*1/2+12m*1/2(1m*)3/2}dm*

 

=

(31/22)r~edgem*1/2(1m*)3/2dm*

Rnormddr0

=

1r~edge(231/2)m*1/2(1m*)3/2ddm*.

We therefore also have,

Rnorm2d2dr02

=

1r~edge2(223)m*1/2(1m*)3/2ddm*[m*1/2(1m*)3/2ddm*]

 

=

1r~edge2(223)m*1/2(1m*)3/2{[m*1/2(1m*)3/2d2dm*2]+[12m*1/2(1m*)3/2+32m*1/2(1m*)1/2]ddm*}

 

=

1r~edge2(23){[2m*(1m*)3d2dm*2]+[(1m*)3+3m*(1m*)2]ddm*}

 

=

1r~edge2(23){2m*(1m*)3d2dm*2+(1m*)2(1+2m*)ddm*}.

So the wave equation may be written,

0

=

Rnorm2d2xdr02+[4Rnormr0(g0ρ0RnormP0)]Rnormdxdr0+(ρ0RnormγgP0)[Rnormω2+(43γg)g0Rnormr0]x

 

=

1r~edge2(23){2m*(1m*)3d2xdm*2+(1m*)2(1+2m*)dxdm*}

 

 

+1r~edge(231/2){4rξ[6RnormR*(3C~)9m*[(1m*)3m*]1/2]}m*1/2(1m*)3/2dxdm*

 

 

+6R*RnormγgGMtot(3C~)9/2[3(1m*)]1/2{Rnormω2+(43γg)GMtotRnormR*3[3C~]15/2(1m*)3/2}x.

Keeping in mind that,

R*Rnorm=[π2337]1/2=r~edge(3C~)3,

we therefore have,

0

=

1r~edge2(23){2m*(1m*)3d2xdm*2+(1m*)2(1+2m*)dxdm*}

 

 

+1r~edge(231/2){4[31/2r~edge[m*1m*]1/2]16(3C~)9[r~edge(3C~)3]1m*[(1m*)3m*]1/2}m*1/2(1m*)3/2dxdm*

 

 

+6(3C~)9/2[r~edge(3C~)3]2[3(1m*)]1/2{[R*3γgGMtot]ω2+(43γg)γg[3C~]15/2(1m*)3/2}x

 

=

1r~edge2(23){2m*(1m*)3d2xdm*2+(1m*)2(1+2m*)dxdm*}

 

 

+1r~edge2(233)[132(3C~)6m*](1m*)2dxdm*+6r~edge2(3C~)6[3(1m*)]1/2(43γg)γg[σ2+(1m*)3/2]x

 

=

1r~edge2(23){2m*(1m*)3d2xdm*2+[56(3C~)6m*+2m*](1m*)2dxdm*+35/2(3C~)6(43γg)γg[σ2(1m*)1/2+(1m*)]x},

where, as before,

σ2(C~3)15/2[R*3(43γg)GMtot]ω2.

Take Another Approach Using Logarithmic Derivatives[edit]

Change Independent Variable[edit]

Returning to the LAWE for n = 3 polytropes, as given, above, and repeated here,

LAWE for n=5 Polytropes

0

=

(3+ξ2)d2xdξ2+[122ξ2]1ξdxdξ+[σc231/2γg(3+ξ2)3/26α]x

let's make the substitution,

u(3+ξ2)1/2

           

ξ2=u23.

We must therefore also make the operator substitution,

ddξ

=

dudξddu

 

=

[ξ(3+ξ2)1/2]ddu=[13u2]1/2ddu

1ξdxdξ

=

1udxdu;

and,

d2dξ2

=

[13u2]1/2ddu{[13u2]1/2ddu}

 

=

[13u2]1/2{3u3[13u2]1/2ddu+[13u2]1/2d2du2}

 

=

3u3ddu+[13u2]d2du2

d2xdξ2

=

3u3dxdu+[13u2]d2xdu2.

The rewritten LAWE is therefore,

0

=

u2{3u3dxdu+[13u2]d2xdu2}+2[9u2]1udxdu+[Ω2u36α]x

 

=

(u23)d2xdu2+(212u2)1udxdu+(Ω2u36α)x,

where we have adopted the shorthand notation,

Ω2σc231/2γg.

Look at Logarithmic Derivative[edit]

Multiplying through by (u2/x) gives,

0

=

(u23)u2xd2xdu2+(212u2)dlnxdlnu+(Ω2u56αu2).

Now, in the context of a separate derivation, we showed that, quite generally we can make the substitution,

u2xd2xdu2

=

ddlnu[dlnxdlnu]+[dlnxdlnu1]dlnxdlnu.

Hence, if we assume that the displacement function can be expressed as a power-law in u, such that,

dlnxdlnu=c0,

then the LAWE for n=5 polytropes simplifies as follows,

0

=

(u23)c0(c01)+(212u2)c0+(Ω2u56αu2).

This polynomial equation will be satisfied if, simultaneously, we set:

  • Ω2=0;
  • c023c06α=0            c0=32[1±(1+8α3)1/2];
  • α=20/3.

This gives us some hope that a more general solution of the following form will work:

x

=

uc0[a+bu+cu2+du3+].

This means that, for example,

dxdu

=

c0uc01[a+bu+cu2+du3]+uc0[b+2cu+3du2]

dlnxdlnu

=

c0(a+bu+cu2+du3)+bu+2cu2+3du3a+bu+cu2+du3

and,

d2xdu2

=

c0(c01)uc02[a+bu+cu2+du3]+2c0uc01[b+2cu+3du2]+uc0[2c+6du]

u2xd2xdu2

=

c0(c01)(a+bu+cu2+du3)+2c0(bu+2cu2+3du3)+(2cu2+6du3)a+bu+cu2+du3

So the LAWE becomes,

(Ω2u56αu2)(a+bu+cu2+du3)

=

(u23)[c0(c01)(a+bu+cu2+du3)+2c0(bu+2cu2+3du3)+(2cu2+6du3)]+(212u2)[c0(a+bu+cu2+du3)+bu+2cu2+3du3].

This is cute, but I don't see any way that this approach will provide an avenue to cancel the Ω2u5 term.


Yet Another Guess[edit]

Let's try,

x

=

ea+blnξ+c(lnξ)2,

and examine the specific case of σc2=0, and, γ=(n+1)/n=6/5α=(320/6)=1/3. Under these conditions, the LAWE for n=5 polytropes becomes,

0

=

(3+ξ2)d2xdξ2+[122ξ2]1ξdxdξ+2x

 

=

(3+ξ2)ξ2xd2xdξ2+[122ξ2]ξxdxdξ+2ξ2.

And the derivatives give,

dxdξ

=

xddξ[a+blnξ+c(lnξ)2]

 

=

x[bξ+2clnξξ]

ξxdxdξ

=

b+2clnξ;

and,

d2xdξ2

=

[bξ+2clnξξ]dxdξ+xddξ[bξ+2clnξξ]

ξ2xd2xdξ2

=

ξ[bξ+2clnξξ]ξxdxdξ+ξ2ddξ[b+2clnξξ]

 

=

[b+2clnξ]2+ξddξ[b+2clnξ]+(b+2clnξ)ξ2[1ξ2]

 

=

(b+2clnξ)2+2c(b+2clnξ)

 

=

[b2+2cb]+[4bc2c]lnξ+4c2(lnξ)2.

Hence the "fundamental mode" LAWE becomes,

0

=

(3+ξ2)[(b2+2cb)+(4bc2c)lnξ+4c2(lnξ)2]+(122ξ2)[b+2clnξ].+2ξ2

Now, this expression cannot be satisfied for arbitrary ξ. But, here we seek a solution only at the surface for the specific model, ξ=3. Plugging this value into the expression gives,

0

=

12[(b2+2cb)+(4bc2c)ln3+4c2(ln3)2]+(1218)[b+2cln3]+18

 

=

2[(b2+2cb)+(4bc2c)ln3+4c2(ln3)2][b+2cln3]+3.

It appears as though one perfectly satisfactory solution is, c=0, in which case, we need,

0

=

2b23b+3

b

=

34[1±183].

Thus, b is an complex number.

Related Discussions[edit]

  • In an accompanying Chapter within our "Ramblings" Appendix, we have played with the adiabatic wave equation for polytropes, examining its form when the primary perturbation variable is an enthalpy-like quantity, rather than the radial displacement of a spherical mass shell. This was done in an effort to mimic the approach that has been taken in studies of the stability of Papaloizou-Pringle tori.
  • n=3M. Schwarzschild (1941, ApJ, 94, 245), Overtone Pulsations of the Standard Model: This work is referenced in §38.3 of [KW94]. It contains an analysis of the radial modes of oscillation of n=3 polytropes, assuming various values of the adiabatic exponent.
  • n=32 … D. Lucas (1953, Bul. Soc. Roy. Sci. Liege, 25, 585) … Citation obtained from the Prasad & Gurm (1961) article.
  • n=1 … L. D. Chatterji (1951, Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. [India], 17, 467) … Citation obtained from the Prasad & Gurm (1961) article.
Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |