|
|
| Line 1,018: |
Line 1,018: |
| <div align="center"> | | <div align="center"> |
| <math>~ | | <math>~ |
| Q \equiv - \frac{d \ln \phi}{ d\ln \eta} \, . | | Q \equiv - \frac{d \ln \phi}{ d\ln \eta} |
| | = \biggl[1- \eta\cot(\eta-B) \biggr] = \biggl[1 + \eta\cot(B - \eta) \biggr]\, . |
| </math> | | </math> |
| </div> | | </div> |
|
| |
|
| <span id="Consider">Now consider</span> the,
| | Also separately, [[SSC/Stability/n1PolytropeLAWE/Pt3#Consider|we have derived]] the following, |
| <div align="center"> | | <div align="center"> |
| <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> |
| Line 1,078: |
Line 1,079: |
| </table> | | </table> |
| </div> | | </div> |
|
| |
|
| |
| [[SSC/Stability/InstabilityOnsetOverview#Configurations_Having_an_Index_Less_Than_Three|Elsewhere]] we have demonstrated that, when <math>n = 1</math>, an analytic solution to the LAWE is,
| |
|
| |
| [[SSC/Stability/n1PolytropeLAWE/Pt3#Recalling|Recalling that]],
| |
| <div align="center">
| |
| <math>~Q = \biggl[1- \eta\cot(\eta-B) \biggr] = \biggl[1 + \eta\cot(B - \eta) \biggr] \, ,</math>
| |
| </div>
| |
| [[SSC/Stability/n1PolytropeLAWE/Pt3#tagJanuary2019|and that]],
| |
| <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>~\frac{d}{d\eta}\biggl[\cot(\eta - B) \biggr]</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>~=</math>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>~
| |
| - \biggl[ 1 + \cot^2(\eta - B)\biggr] \, ,
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
| [[SSC/Stability/n1PolytropeLAWE/Pt3#Consider|we have derived]] the following,
| |
| <div align="center">
| |
| <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="center" colspan="3"><font color="maroon"><b>Precise Solution to the Polytropic LAWE</b></font></td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>~x_P</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>~=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>~\frac{b(n-1)}{2n}\biggl[1 + \biggl(\frac{n-3}{n-1}\biggr) \biggl( \frac{1}{\eta \phi^{n}}\biggr) \frac{d\phi}{d\eta}\biggr]</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
|
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>~=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>~-b\biggl[ \biggl( \frac{1}{\eta \phi}\biggr) \frac{d\phi}{d\eta}\biggr]</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
|
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>~=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>~\frac{b}{\eta^2}\biggl[ -\frac{d\ln \phi}{d\ln \eta}\biggr] </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
|
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>~=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>~\frac{bQ}{\eta^2} \, .</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
| </div>
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ====First Try==== | | ====First Try==== |
Main Sequence to Red Giant to Planetary Nebula (Part 2)
Foundation
In an accompanying discussion, we derived the so-called,
Adiabatic Wave (or Radial Pulsation) Equation
|
|
|
whose solution gives eigenfunctions that describe various radial modes of oscillation in spherically symmetric, self-gravitating fluid configurations.
|
Introducing the dimensionless frequency-squared, , we can rewrite this LAWE as,
|
|
|
|
where, as a reminder, . Now, for our bipolytrope, we have found it useful to adopt the following four dimensionless variables:
|
|
|
|
; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; |
|
|
|
This means that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Making these substitutions, the LAWE can be rewritten as,
|
|
|
|
then, multiplying through by allows us to everywhere switch from to , namely,
|
|
|
|
|
In shorthand, we can rewrite this equation in the form,
where,
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
and,
and,
Specific Case of (nc, ne) = (5,1)
Drawing from our "Table 2" profiles, let's evaluate and for the two separate regions of bipolytrope model.
The nc = 5 Core
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also,
|
|
|
|
Hence, the LAWE becomes,
|
|
|
|
Multiplying through by gives,
|
|
|
|
|
Let's compare this with the equivalent expression presented separately, namely,
Polytropic LAWE (linear adiabatic wave equation)
|
|
|
|
where: and,
|
The primary E-type solution for n = 5 polytropes states that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence, the LAWE may be written as,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Versus above,
|
|
|
|
|
If we set and we set , this becomes,
|
|
|
|
Next, try the solution, and :
|
LAWE
|
|
|
|
LAWE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ne = 1 Envelope
Throughout the envelope we have,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence,
|
|
|
|
and,
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Let's compare this with the equivalent expression presented separately, namely,
Polytropic LAWE (linear adiabatic wave equation)
|
|
|
|
where: and,
|
The equilibrium, off-center equilibrium solution for n = 1 polytropes states that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence, the LAWE may be written as,
|
|
|
|
|
Blind Alleys
Reminder
From a separate discussion, we have demonstrated that the LAWE relevant to the envelope is,
|
|
|
|
If we assume that, and , then the relevant envelope LAWE is,
|
|
|
|
where,
Also separately, we have derived the following,
| Precise Solution to the Polytropic LAWE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Try
|
|
|
and
|
in which case,
|
LAWE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now set and set :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We see that the complexity of the LAWE reduces substantially if we set ; specifically, this choice gives,
Close, but no cigar!
Second Try
Next, let's set but let's leave unspecified:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first term goes to zero if we set ; then, in order for the second term to go to zero, we need …
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This means that the envelope is incompressible.
Third Try
Related Discussions