SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/RedGiantToPN/Pt2: Difference between revisions
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1,717: | Line 1,717: | ||
(1 - Q )\cdot \biggl[\eta \cdot \sin(B-\eta) \biggr] | (1 - Q )\cdot \biggl[\eta \cdot \sin(B-\eta) \biggr] | ||
\biggr\} | \biggr\} | ||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
---- | |||
Hence, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>\mathrm{LAWE}_1 + \mathrm{LAWE}_2</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\frac{2b}{\eta^4}\biggl[ Q-1 \biggr] | |||
+ | |||
\frac{2c}{\eta^3}\biggl[\sin(B-\eta)\biggr]^{-3}\biggl\{ | |||
\eta^2\cdot \cos(B-\eta) | |||
- \biggl[\sin^2(B-\eta)\cos(B-\eta)\biggr] | |||
+ | |||
(1 - Q )\cdot \biggl[\eta \cdot \sin(B-\eta) \biggr] | |||
\biggr\} | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\frac{2(b-c)}{\eta^3}\biggl[\cot(B-\eta) \biggr] | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
====Fourth Try==== | |||
Try adding an additional term that was discussed above under "First Try", namely, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>x_3</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\frac{d}{\eta} | |||
\, , | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
in which case, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math> | |||
\mathrm{LAWE}_{3} | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
-\frac{2d}{\eta^3} \, , | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
and, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>\mathrm{LAWE}_{1} + \mathrm{LAWE}_{2} + \mathrm{LAWE}_{3}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\frac{2}{\eta^3}\biggl[(b-c)\cot(B-\eta) - d \biggr] | |||
\, . | |||
</math> | </math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Latest revision as of 17:56, 12 January 2026
Main Sequence to Red Giant to Planetary Nebula (Part 2)[edit]
Part I: Background & Objective
|
Part II:
|
Part III:
|
Part IV:
|
Foundation[edit]
In an accompanying discussion, we derived the so-called,
whose solution gives eigenfunctions that describe various radial modes of oscillation in spherically symmetric, self-gravitating fluid configurations.
|
Introducing the dimensionless frequency-squared, , we can rewrite this LAWE as,
where, as a reminder, . Now, for our bipolytrope, we have found it useful to adopt the following four dimensionless variables:
This means that,
Making these substitutions, the LAWE can be rewritten as,
then, multiplying through by allows us to everywhere switch from to , namely,
|
In shorthand, we can rewrite this equation in the form,
|
|
|
|
where,
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
and,
and,
|
|
|
|
Specific Case of (nc, ne) = (5,1)[edit]
Drawing from our "Table 2" profiles, let's evaluate and for the two separate regions of bipolytrope model.
The nc = 5 Core[edit]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also,
|
|
|
|
Hence, the LAWE becomes,
|
|
|
|
Multiplying through by gives,
|
|
|
|
|
Let's compare this with the equivalent expression presented separately, namely, The primary E-type solution for n = 5 polytropes states that,
Hence, the LAWE may be written as,
Versus above,
|
If we set and we set , this becomes,
|
|
|
|
Next, try the solution, and :
|
LAWE |
|
|
|
LAWE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ne = 1 Envelope[edit]
Throughout the envelope we have,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence,
|
|
|
|
and,
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
|
Let's compare this with the equivalent expression presented separately, namely, The equilibrium, off-center equilibrium solution for n = 1 polytropes states that,
Hence, the LAWE may be written as,
|
Blind Alleys[edit]
Reminder[edit]
From a separate discussion, we have demonstrated that the LAWE relevant to the envelope is,
|
|
|
|
If we assume that, and , then the relevant envelope LAWE is,
|
|
|
|
where,
Also separately, we have derived the following,
| Precise Solution to the Polytropic LAWE | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Try[edit]
|
|
|
and |
in which case,
|
LAWE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now set and set :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We see that the complexity of the LAWE reduces substantially if we set ; specifically, this choice gives,
|
|
|
|
Close, but no cigar!
Second Try[edit]
Next, let's set but let's leave unspecified:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first term goes to zero if we set ; then, in order for the second term to go to zero, we need …
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This means that the envelope is incompressible.
Third Try[edit]
Note that,
and that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let's try …
|
|
|
|
If we assume that, and , then the relevant envelope LAWE is the sum of the pair of sub-LAWEs,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One at a time:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Try[edit]
Try adding an additional term that was discussed above under "First Try", namely,
|
|
|
|
in which case,
|
|
|
|
and,
|
|
|
|
Related Discussions[edit]
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |