SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/RedGiantToPN

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Main Sequence to Red Giant to Planetary Nebula

Preface

In terms of mass (m), length (), and time (t), the units of various physical constants and variables are:

Mass-density

m3

Pressure (energy-density)

m1t2

Newtonian gravitational constant, G

m13t2

The core's polytropic constant, Kc

[m113t10]1/5

The envelope's polytropic constant, Ke

m15t2


As a result, for example (see details below), if we hold the central-density (ρ0) — as well as G and Kc — constant along an equilibrium sequence, mass will scale as …

Mass

[Kc3/2G3/2ρ01/5]

 

{[m113t10]1/5}3/2[m13t2]3/2[m3]1/5

 

[m3/10+3/21/5][39/109/2+3/5][t3+3]

 

[m+1][0][t0].

If instead (see details below) we hold Ke — as well as G and Kc — constant along an equilibrium sequence, mass will scale as …

Mass

[Kc5KeG6]1/4

 

{[m113t10][m15t2][m13t2]6}1/4

 

{[m11+6][13+518][t102+12]}1/4

 

[m+1][0][t0].

Original Model Construction

Fixed Central Density

From Examples, we find,

Mcore=Mcore*[Kc3/2G3/2ρ01/5]

=

[Kc3/2G3/2ρ01/5](6π)1/2(ξiθi)3;

Mtot=Mtot*[Kc3/2G3/2ρ01/5]

=

[Kc3/2G3/2ρ01/5](μeμc)2(2π)1/2Aηsθi;

rcore=rcore*[Kc1/2G1/2ρ02/5]

=

[Kc1/2G1/2ρ02/5](32π)1/2ξi;

R=rs*[Kc1/2G1/2ρ02/5]

=

[Kc1/2G1/2ρ02/5](μeμc)1ηs2πθi2;

where, rewriting the relevant expressions in terms of the parameters,

iξi3;       and       m33(μeμc),

we find,

θi

=

(1+i2)1/2

ηi

=

(μeμc)3θi2ξi=m3(i1+i2)

Λi

=

1ηiξi3=[1+i2m3i]i=1m3i[1+(1m3)i2]

A2

=

ηi2(1+Λi2)

 

=

m32(i1+i2)2(1+i2)m32i2[1+(1m3)2i2]

 

=

[1+(1m3)2i21+i2]

ηs

=

π2+ηi+tan1(Λi)

Fixed Interface Pressure

Equilibrium Sequence Expressions

From the relevant interface conditions, we find,

(KeKc)

=

ρ04/5(μeμc)2θi4.

Inverting this last expression gives,

ρ04/5

=

(μeμc)2θi4(KeKc)1

ρ01/5

=

[(μeμc)1/2θi1(KeKc)1/4].

Hence, keeping Kc and Ke constant, we have,

Mcore

=

[Kc3/2G3/2(KeKc)1/4][(μeμc)1/2θi](6π)1/2(ξiθi)3

 

=

[Kc5KeG6]1/4(μeμc)1/2(6π)1/2ξi3θi4;

Mtot

=

[Kc3/2G3/2(KeKc)1/4][(μeμc)1/2θi](μeμc)2(2π)1/2Aηsθi

 

=

[Kc5KeG6]1/4(μeμc)3/2(2π)1/2Aηs;

rcore

=

[KeG1]1/2(μeμc)(32π)1/2ξiθi2;

R

=

[KeG1]1/2ηs2π;

ρ0

=

[KeKc]5/4(μeμc)5/2θi5;

Pi

=

[Kc][(μeμc)3θi6(KeKc)3/2]θi6

 

=

[Kc5Ke3]1/2(μeμc)3.

This last expression shows that if Kc and Ke are both held fixed, then the interface pressure, Pi, will be constant along the sequence of equilibrium models.

Note also:

νMcoreMtot

=

{[Kc5KeG6]1/4(μeμc)1/2(6π)1/2ξi3θi4}{[Kc5KeG6]1/4(μeμc)3/2(2π)1/2Aηs}1

 

=

(μeμc)23ξi3θi4Aηs;

qrcoreR

=

{[KeG1]1/2(μeμc)(32π)1/2ξiθi2}{[KeG1]1/2ηs2π}1

 

=

(μeμc)3ξiθi2ηs.

Sequence Plots

A plot of Mtot[Kc5KeG6]1/4 versus R[KeG1]1/2 at fixed interface pressure will be generated via the relations,

Ordinate   Abscissa

(μeμc)3/2(2π)1/2Aηs

vs

ηs2π

Alternatively, a plot of Mtot[Kc5KeG6]1/4 versus ρ0[KeKc]5/4 at fixed interface pressure will be generated via the relations,

Ordinate   Abscissa

(μeμc)3/2(2π)1/2Aηs

vs

(μeμc)5/2θi5

Fixed Total Mass

Again, drawing from previous Examples in which ρ0 — as well as Kc and G — is held fixed, equilibrium models obey the relations,

Mtot

=

Mtot*[Kc3/2G3/2ρ01/5]=[Kc3/2G3/2ρ01/5](μeμc)2(2π)1/2Aηsθi;

R

=

R*[Kc1/2G1/2ρ02/5]=[Kc1/2G1/2ρ02/5](μeμc)1ηs2πθi2;

Pi

=

Pi*[Kcρ06/5]=[Kcρ06/5]θi6.

Let's invert the first expression in order to construct equilibrium sequences in which the total mass — rather than ρ0 — is held fixed. We find that,

ρ01/5

=

[Kc3/2G3/2Mtot1](μeμc)2(2π)1/2Aηsθi

R

=

[Kc1/2G1/2](μeμc)1ηs2πθi2{[Kc3/2G3/2Mtot1](μeμc)2(2π)1/2Aηsθi}2

 

=

[Kc1/2G1/2](μeμc)1ηs2πθi2[Kc3/2G3/2Mtot1]2(μeμc)4(π2)θi2A2ηs2

 

=

[Kc5/2G5/2Mtot2](μeμc)3(π23)1/21A2ηs.

And,

Pi

=

Kcθi6{[Kc3/2G3/2Mtot1](μeμc)2(2π)1/2Aηsθi}6

 

=

Kc{[Kc3/2G3/2Mtot1]6(μeμc)12(2π)3A6ηs6}

 

=

[Kc10G9Mtot6](μeμc)12(2π)3A6ηs6.

Note as well that,

Pi(4π3R3)

=

4π3[Kc10G9Mtot6](μeμc)12(2π)3A6ηs6{[Kc5/2G5/2Mtot2](μeμc)3(π23)1/21A2ηs}3

 

=

4π3(2π)3(π23)3/2[Kc10G9Mtot6](μeμc)12ηs3{[Kc15/2G15/2Mtot6](μeμc)9}

 

=

4π3(2π)3(π23)3/2[Kc5/2G3/2](μeμc)3ηs3


Following the Lead of Yabushita75

Here in the context of (nc,ne)=(5,1) bipolytropes, we want to construct an interface-pressure versus volume plot; and mass-versus-central density plots like the ones displayed for truncated isothermal spheres in Figure 1 of an accompanying discussion, and as displayed for a (nc,ne)=(,3/2) bipolytrope in Figure 1 (p. 445) of 📚 S. Yabushita (1975, MNRAS, Vol. 172, pp. 441 - 453).

In our accompanying chapter that presents example models of (nc,ne)=(5,1) bipolytropes, we have adopted the following normalizations:

ρ*

ρρ0

;    

r*

r[Kc1/2/(G1/2ρ02/5)]

P*

PKcρ06/5

;    

Mr*

Mr[Kc3/2/(G3/2ρ01/5)]

Also, from the relevant interface conditions, we find,

(KeKc)

=

ρ04/5(μeμc)2θi4.

Inverting this last expression gives,

ρ04/5

=

(μeμc)2θi4(KeKc)1

ρ01/5

=

(μeμc)1/2θi1(KeKc)1/4.

Hence, we can rewrite the "normalized" expressions as follows:

r

=

r*[Kc1/2G1/2ρ02/5]

 

=

r*{Kc1/2G1/2[(μeμc)1/2θi1(KeKc)1/4]2}

 

=

r*{Kc1/2G1/2[(μeμc)θi2(KeKc)1/2]}

 

=

r*[Ke1/2G1/2](μeμc)θi2.


Fixed Interface Pressure

Start with the model relation,

Pi

=

[Kcρ06/5]Pi*

 

=

[Kcρ06/5](1+13ξi2)3

Now, given that,

ρ01/5

=

(μeμc)1/2θi1(KeKc)1/4.

ρ06/5

=

(μeμc)3θi6(KeKc)3/2.

Fixed Total Mass

Also, from the relevant interface conditions, we find,

(KeKc)

=

ρ04/5(μeμc)2θi4.

Inverting this last expression gives,

ρ04/5

=

(μeμc)2θi4(KeKc)1

ρ01/5

=

(μeμc)1/2θi1(KeKc)1/4.

Hence, for a given specification of the interface location, ξi — test values shown (in parentheses) assuming μe/μc=1.0 and ξi=0.5 — the desired expression for the central density is,

ρ0

=

[Ke5Kc5]1/4(μeμc)5/2θi5;

and, drawing the expression for the normalized total mass from our accompanying table of parameter values, namely,

Mtot*

=

(μeμc)2(2π)1/2Aηsθi

we find,

Mr

=

Mr*[Kc3/2G3/2ρ01/5]

 

=

Mr*[Kc3/2G3/2]{(μeμc)1/2θi1(KeKc)1/4}1

 

=

Mr*[Kc3/2G3/2(KeKc)1/4](μeμc)1/2θi

Mtot

=

[Kc3/2G3/2(KeKc)1/4](μeμc)1/2θi(μeμc)2(2π)1/2Aηsθi

 

=

[KeKc5G6]1/4(μeμc)3/2(2π)1/2Aηs,

where — again, from our accompanying table of parameter values

θi

=

(1+13ξi2)1/2;

      (0.96077)

ηi

=

(μeμc)3θi2ξi;

      (0.79941)

Λi

=

1ηiξi3;

      (0.96225)

A

=

ηi(1+Λi2)1/2;

      (1.10940)

ηs

=

ηi+π2+tan1(Λi);

      (3.13637)

Mtot[KeKc5G6]1/4

=

(μeμc)3/2(2π)1/2Aηs;

      (2.77623)

ρ0[Ke5Kc5]1/4

=

(μeμc)5/2θi5.

      (1.22153)

Building on Earlier Eigenfunction Details

In the heading of Figure 6 from our accompanying presentation of the properties of marginally unstable oscillation modes in (nc,ne)=(5,1) bipolytropes, we point to the (Excel spreadsheet) "Data File" that contains most of the relevant model details. See specifically,

file = Dropbox/WorkFolder/Wiki edits/BiPolytrope/LinearPerturbation/FaulknerBipolytrope1.xlsx --- worksheet = Mode0Ensemble
file = Dropbox/WorkFolder/Wiki edits/BiPolytrope/LinearPerturbation/FaulknerBipolytrope1.xlsx --- worksheet = Mode0Ensemble
Figure 6: Eigenfunctions Associated with the Fundamental-Mode of Radial Oscillation

in Marginally Unstable Models having Various μe/μc

Related Discussions

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |