SSC/Structure/PolytropesEmbedded/n5

From JETohlineWiki
Revision as of 20:47, 28 December 2023 by Joel2 (talk | contribs) (Tabular Summary (n=5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Embedded Polytropic Spheres


Part I:   General Properties

 


Part II:  Truncated Configurations with n = 1

 


Part III:  Truncated Configurations with n = 5

 


Part IV:  Other Considerations

 


Truncated Configurations with n = 5

Drawing from the earlier discussion of isolated polytropes, we will reference various radial locations within a spherical n = 5 polytrope by the dimensionless radius,

ξran=5,

where,

an=5=[(n+1)K4πGρc(1/n1)]n=51/2=[3K2πG]1/2ρc2/5.

The solution to the Lane-Emden equation for n=5 is,

θ5

=

(1+ξ23)1/2,

hence,

dθ5dξ

=

ξ3(1+ξ23)3/2.

Review

Again, from the earlier discussion, we can describe the properties of an isolated, spherical n = 5 polytrope as follows:

  • Mass:
In terms of the central density, ρc, and Kn, the total mass is,

M=[234K3πG3]1/2ρc1/5 ;

and, expressed as a function of M, the mass that lies interior to the dimensionless radius ξ is,

MξM=ξ3(3+ξ2)3/2.

Hence,

Mξ=[234K3πG3]1/2ρc1/5[ξ3(3+ξ2)3/2].

  • Pressure:
The central pressure of the configuration is,

Pc=[πM2G3234]1/3ρc4/3=[πG3234(234K3πG3)ρc2/5]1/3ρc4/3=Kρc6/5 ;

and, expressed in terms of the central pressure Pc, the variation with radius of the pressure is,

Pξ=Pc[1+13ξ2]3 .

Hence,

Pξ=Kρc6/5[1+13ξ2]3=33Kρc6/5[3+ξ2]3 .

Extension to Bounded Sphere

Eliminating ρc between the last expression for Mξ and the last expression for Pξ gives,

Pξ =

33K[3+ξ2]3[234K3πG3]3Mξ6[ξ3(3+ξ2)3/2]6

  =

(23315K10π3Mξ6G9)ξ18(3+ξ2)12.

Now, if we rip off an outer layer of the star down to some dimensionless radius ξe<, the interior of the configuration that remains — containing mass Mξe — should remain in equilibrium if we impose the appropriate amount of externally applied pressure Pe=Pξe at that radius. (This will work only for spherically symmetric configurations, as the gravitation acceleration at any location only depends on the mass contained inside that radius.) If we rescale our solution such that the mass enclosed within ξe is the original total mass M, then the pressure that must be imposed by the external medium in which the configuration is embedded is,

Pe=(23315K10π3M6G9)ξe18(3+ξe2)12 .

The associated equilibrium radius of this pressure-confined configuration is,

Req=ξean=5=[3K2πG]1/2ρc2/5ξe=[πM4G52337K5]1/2(3+ξe2)3ξe5.

Overlap with Whitworth's Presentation

The curve labeled n=5 in the top two panels of Figure 1 shows how Req varies with the applied external pressure Pe; as shown, the curve has two segments — configurations that are stable (blue diamonds) and configurations that are unstable (red squares). Following the lead of Whitworth (1981, MNRAS, 195, 967) — for clarification, read the accompanying ASIDE — these two quantities have been respectively normalized (or, "referenced") to,

Rrf|n=52633(π55)1/2[G5M4K5]1/2ReqRrf=(552153)1/2(3+ξe2)3ξe5;

and,

Prf|n=531259226π3(K10G9M6)PePrf=(2293359)ξe18(3+ξe2)12.

We see that this n=5 model sequence bends back on itself. That is to say, for this polytropic index there is an externally applied pressure above which no equilibrium configuration exists. This limiting pressure arises along the curve where,

dPedReq=(dPedξe)(dReqdξe)1=0.

Evaluation of this expression shows that the limiting pressure occurs precisely at ξe=3, that is,

(PePrf)max=(2293359)3181212=253959,

and the radius of this limiting configuration is,

(ReqRrf)=(552153)1/212335=(552335)1/2.

On the log-log plot displayed in the top-right panel of Figure 1, the location of this special point is [log(Pe/Prf),log(Req/Rrf)][0.49149,+0.10308].

We note as well that a conversion from Whitworth's normalizations to the normalizations adopted by Horedt produce the following coordinates for the limiting model configuration:

pa|max

=

312224,

and, at this bounding pressure, the model has an equilibrium radius,

ra

=

2633.

Overlap with Stahler's Presentation

We can invert the above expression for Pe(K,M) to obtain the following expression for M(K,Pe):

M6=(23315K10π3PeG9)ξe18(3+ξe2)12 .

If, following Stahler's lead, we normalize this expression by MSWS (evaluated for n=5) and we normalize the above expression for Req by RSWS (evaluated for n=5), we obtain,

MMSWS

=

(23315K10π3PeG9)1/6ξe3(3+ξe2)2[(235G)3/2K5/3Pex1/6]1

 

=

(32534π)1/2ξe3(3+ξe2)2,

ReqRSWS

=

[πM4G52337K5]1/2(3+ξe2)3ξe5[(235G)1/2K5/6Pex1/3]1

 

=

[(23315K10π3PeG9)1/3ξe6(3+ξe2)4][πG52337K5]1/2(3+ξe2)3ξe5(5G23)1/2[K5/6Pex1/3]

 

=

(32522π)1/2ξe(3+ξe2).

This set of parametric relations that relate the mass of the truncated configuration to its radius via the parameter, ξe, has been recorded to the immediate right of Stahler's name in our n=5 summary table, below.

Stahler points out (see his equation B13) that, for this particular pressure-bounded polytropic sequence, ξe can be eliminated between the expressions to obtain the following direct algebraic relationship between M and Req:

(MMSWS)25(MMSWS)(ReqRSWS)+20π3(ReqRSWS)4

=

0.

Viewed as a quadratic equation in the mass, the roots of this expression give,

MMSWS

=

52(ReqRSWS){1±[116π15(ReqRSWS)2]1/2}.

[CORRECTION: Changed factor inside square root from 16π/3 to 16π/15 on 24 December 2014.] We have used this expression to generate the complete n=5 sequence shown here in the top panel of Figure 2 — the solid green segment of the curve shows the negative root and the solid red segment of the curve was generated using the positive root.


ASIDE: In his Appendix B, Stahler (1983) claims that the quadratic equation relating M directly to Req (his equation B13) can be obtained by analytically integrating the first-order ordinary differential equation presented as his equation B10. I don't think that this is possible without knowing ahead of time how M relates to Req through the above-derived parametric relations in ξe.

[29 September 2014 by J. E. Tohline] Now that (I think) I've finished deriving the properly defined virial equilibrium condition for embedded polytropes and have reconciled that equilibrium expression with Horedt's corresponding specification of the equilibrium radius and surface-pressure, it's time to revisit the concern that was expressed in this "ASIDE" regarding the mass-radius relationship for embedded, n=5 polytropes presented by Stahler.

Tabular Summary (n=5)

Table 2:  Properties of n=5 Polytropes Embedded in an External Medium of Pressure Pe
(and, accordingly, truncated at radius ξe)

θ5=(1+ξe23)1/2

        and        

dθ5dξ|ξe=ξe3(1+ξe23)3/2

📚 Horedt (1970)
for
fixed (M,Kn)

ra=ReqRHoredt={3[(ξe2/3)5(1+ξe2/3)6]}1/2

pa=PePHoredt=33[(ξe2/3)3(1+ξe2/3)4]3

📚 Whitworth (1981)
for
fixed (M,Kn)

ReqRrf={21555[(ξe2/3)5(1+ξe2/3)6]}1/2

PePrf=22959[(ξe2/3)3(1+ξe2/3)4]3

📚 Stahler (1983)
for
fixed (Pe,Kn)

ReqRSWS={3522π[ξe2/3(1+ξe2/3)2]}1/2

MMSWS=[(35322π)(ξe2/3)3(1+ξe2/3)4]1/2

(MMSWS)25(MMSWS)(ReqRSWS)+225π3(ReqRSWS)4=0

NOTE: None of the analytic expressions for the dimensionless radius, pressure, or mass presented in this table explicitly appear in the referenced articles by Horedt, by Whitworth, or by Stahler but, as is discussed fully above, they are straightforwardly derivable from the more general relations that appear in these papers. The final polynomial relating the dimensionless mass to the dimensionless radius does explicitly appear as equation (B13) in 📚 Stahler (1983).

Additional discussion of Stahler's analytic mass-radius relation is presented in an accompanying chapter.

Equilibrium Sequences

Example Sequences

Pulling from, and setting n = 5 in, our above discussion of Chieze's presentation, we find the following …

PePCh

=

θn+1=(1+ξ23)3

ReqRCh

=

[32π]1/2ξ

MtotMCh

=

[(n+1)34π]1/2(ξ2θ')=[233322π]1/2{ξ33(1+ξ23)3/2}=[23π]1/2{ξ3(1+ξ23)3/2}

where,

PCh

Kρc(n+1)/n=Kρc6/5

RCh

[(KG)ρc1/n1]1/2=[(KG)ρc4/5]1/2

MCh

[(KG)3ρc2/5]1/2.

Hence,

Pe

=

(1+ξ23)3Kρc6/5

Req

=

[32π]1/2(KG)1/2ρc2/5ξ

Mtot

=

[23π]1/2(KG)3/2ρc1/5ξ3(1+ξ23)3/2


  • External Pressure vs. Volume (fixed mass); displayed in panel "a" of Figure 3:

Pe[G9K10M6]

=

(23π)3ξ18(1+ξ23)12

(4πR33)[(KG)15/2M6]

=

(π23)5/2ξ15(1+ξ23)9

  • Mass vs. Radius (fixed external pressure); displayed in panel "b" of Figure 3:

M[G3/2K5/3Pe1/6]

=

(23π)1/2ξ3(1+ξ23)2

R[G1/2K5/6Pe1/3]

=

(32π)1/2ξ(1+ξ23)1

  • Mass vs. Central Density (fixed external pressure); displayed in panel "c" of Figure 3:

M[G3/2K5/3Pe1/6]

=

(23π)1/2ξ3(1+ξ23)2

ρc[KPe1]5/6

=

(1+ξ23)5/2


  • Mass vs. Central Density (fixed radius); displayed in panel "d" of Figure 3:

Req

=

[32π]1/2(KG)1/2ρc2/5ξ

ρc2/5

=

[32π]1/2(KG)1/2R1ξ

ρc

=

[32π]5/4[(KG)1/2R1]5/2ξ5/2

M

=

[23π]1/2(KG)3/2{[32π]5/4[(KG)1/2R1]5/2ξ5/2}1/5ξ3(1+ξ23)3/2

 

=

[23π]1/2(KG)3/2{[32π]1/4[(KG)1/2R1]1/2ξ1/2}ξ3(1+ξ23)3/2

 

=

[2232π2]1/4[2π3]1/4(KG)3/2[(KG)1/4R1/2]ξ5/2(1+ξ23)3/2

 

=

[233π]1/4[(KG)5R2]1/4ξ5/2(1+ξ23)3/2


Figure 3:   Equilibrium Sequences of Pressure-Truncated, n = 5 Polytropic Spheres
(viewed from several different astrophysical perspectives)

ξe External Pressure vs. Volume
(Fixed Mass)
Mass vs. Radius
(Fixed External Pressure)
Mass vs. Central Density
(Fixed External Pressure)
Mass vs. Central Density
(Fixed Radius)
√3 (a)
Pressure-Truncated Isothermal Equilibrium Sequence
Pressure-Truncated Isothermal Equilibrium Sequence
(b)
Pressure-Truncated Isothermal Equilibrium Sequence
Pressure-Truncated Isothermal Equilibrium Sequence
(c)
Pressure-Truncated Isothermal Equilibrium Sequence
Pressure-Truncated Isothermal Equilibrium Sequence
(d)
Pressure-Truncated Isothermal Equilibrium Sequence
Pressure-Truncated Isothermal Equilibrium Sequence
3
√15
9.01
  (23π)3[ξ18(1+ξ23)12]ξ~
vs.

(π23)5/2[ξ15(1+ξ23)9]ξ~

(23π)1/2[ξ3(1+ξ23)2]ξ~
vs.
(32π)1/2[ξ(1+ξ23)1]ξ~
(23π)1/2[ξ3(1+ξ23)2]ξ~
vs.
[(1+ξ23)5/2]ξ~
[233π]1/4[ξ5/2(1+ξ23)3/2]ξ~
vs.
[32π]5/4ξ~5/2

Example Extrema

  1. External Pressure vs. Volume (fixed mass):
    1. Maximum Pe (green circular marker) …

      0

      =

      ddξ{ξ18(1+ξ23)12}

       

      =

      18ξ17(1+ξ23)1212ξ18(1+ξ23)132ξ3

       

      =

      ξ17(1+ξ23)13[18(1+ξ23)8ξ2]

       

      =

      ξ17(1+ξ23)13[182ξ2]

      ξgreen2

      =

      9.

    2. Minimum Volume (purple circular marker) …

      0

      =

      ddξ{ξ15(1+ξ23)9}

       

      =

      15ξ16(1+ξ23)9+9ξ15(1+ξ23)82ξ3

       

      =

      ξ16(1+ξ23)8[15(1+ξ23)+6ξ2]

       

      =

      ξ16(1+ξ23)8[ξ215]

      ξpurple2

      =

      15.

  2. Mass vs. Central Density (fixed radius):
    1. Maximum mass (??? circular marker) …

      0

      =

      ddξ{ξ5/2(1+ξ23)3/2}

       

      =

      52ξ3/2(1+ξ23)3/232ξ5/2(1+ξ23)5/22ξ3

       

      =

      ξ3/26(1+ξ23)5/2[5(3+ξ2)6ξ2]

       

      =

      ξ3/26(1+ξ23)5/2[15ξ2]

      ξ2

      =

      15=ξpurple2.

Related Discussions

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |