SSC/Stability/n1PolytropeLAWE

From JETohlineWiki
Revision as of 14:29, 21 January 2024 by Joel2 (talk | contribs) (→Setup)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Radial Oscillations of n = 1 Polytropic Spheres (Pt 1)


Part I:   Search for Analytic Solutions
 

Part II:  New Ideas
 

III:  What About Bipolytropes?
 


As far as we have been able to ascertain, the first technical examination of radial oscillation modes in n=1 polytropes was performed — using numerical techniques — in 1951 by L. D. Chatterji; at the time, he was in the Mathematics Department of Allahabad University. His two papers on this topic were published in, what is now referred to as, the Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy (PINSA). The citations that immediately follow this opening paragraph provide inks to both of these papers by Chatterji, but the links may be insecure. (Citations/links to articles that provide analyses of models having other polytropic indexes are provided at the bottom of this chapter.) Apparently Springer is archiving recent PINSA volumes, but their holdings do not date back as early as 1951.

A detailed review of Chatterji51 is provided in an accompanying discussion.

Groundwork

In an accompanying discussion, we derived the so-called,

Adiabatic Wave (or Radial Pulsation) Equation

d2xdr02+[4r0−(g0ρ0P0)]dxdr0+(ρ0γgP0)[ω2+(4−3γg)g0r0]x=0

whose solution gives eigenfunctions that describe various radial modes of oscillation in spherically symmetric, self-gravitating fluid configurations. Because this widely used form of the radial pulsation equation is not dimensionless but, rather, has units of inverse length-squared, we have found it useful to also recast it in the following dimensionless form:

d2xdχ02+[4χ0−(ρ0ρc)(P0Pc)−1(g0gSSC)]dxdχ0+(ρ0ρc)(P0Pc)−1(1γg)[τSSC2ω2+(4−3γg)(g0gSSC)1χ0]x=0,

where,

gSSC≡PcRρc,       and       τSSC≡[R2ρcPc]1/2.

In a separate discussion, we showed that specifically for isolated, polytropic configurations, this linear adiabatic wave equation (LAWE) can be rewritten as,

0

=

d2xdξ2+[4−(n+1)V(ξ)ξ]dxdξ+[ω2γgθ(n+14πGρc)−(3−4γg)⋅(n+1)V(x)ξ2]x

 

=

d2xdξ2+[4ξ−(n+1)θ(−dθdξ)]dxdξ+(n+1)θ[σc26γg−αξ(−dθdξ)]x,

where we have adopted the dimensionless frequency notation,

σc2

≡

3ω22πGρc.

Here we focus on an analysis of the specific case of isolated, n=1 polytropic configurations, whose unperturbed equilibrium structure can be prescribed in terms of analytic functions. Our hope — as yet unfulfilled — is that we can discover an analytically prescribed eigenvector solution to the governing LAWE.

Search for Analytic Solutions to the LAWE

Setup

From our derived structure of an n = 1 polytrope, in terms of the configuration's radius R and mass M, the central pressure and density are, respectively,

Pc=πG8(M2R4) ,

and

ρc=πM4R3 .

Hence the characteristic time and acceleration are, respectively,

τSSC=[R2ρcPc]1/2=[2R3GM]1/2=[π2Gρc]1/2,

and,

gSSC=PcRρc=(GM2R2).

The required functions are,

  • Density:

ρ0(χ0)ρc=sin⁡(πχ0)πχ0 ;

  • Pressure:

P0(χ0)Pc=[sin⁡(πχ0)πχ0]2 ;

  • Gravitational acceleration:

g0(r0)gSSC=2χ02[Mr(χ0)M]=2πχ02[sin⁡(πχ0)−πχ0cos⁡(πχ0)].

So our desired Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors will be solutions to the following ODE:

d2xdχ02+2χ0[1+πχ0cot⁡(πχ0)]dxdχ0+1γg{πχ0sin⁡(πχ0)[πω22Gρc]+2χ02(4−3γg)[1−πχ0cot⁡(πχ0)]}x=0,


or, replacing χ0 with ξ≡πχ0 and dividing the entire expression by π2, we have,

d2xdξ2+2ξ[1+ξcot⁡ξ]dxdξ+1γg{ξsin⁡ξ[ω22πGρc]+2ξ2(4−3γg)[1−ξcot⁡ξ]}x=0.


This is identical to the formulation of the wave equation that is relevant to the (n = 1) core of the composite polytrope studied by J. O. Murphy & R. Fiedler (1985b); for comparison, their expression is displayed, in the following boxed-in image.

n = 1 Polytropic Formulation of the LAWE as Presented by …

J. O. Murphy & R. Fiedler (1985)
Radial Pulsations and Vibrational Stability of a Sequence of Two Zone Polytropic Stellar Models
Proceedings of the Astronomical Society of Australia, Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 222 - 226

d2ηdζ2+1ζ[4+2(ζcos⁡ζ−sin⁡ζ)sin⁡ζ]dηdζ+[ωk2ζsin⁡ζ+2α*(ζcos⁡ζ−sin⁡ζ)ζ2sin⁡ζ]η=0


Material that appears after this point in our presentation is under development and therefore
may contain incorrect mathematical equations and/or physical misinterpretations.
|   Go Home   |


 

From an accompanying discussion, we find the,

Polytropic LAWE (linear adiabatic wave equation)

0=d2xdξ2+[4−(n+1)Q]1ξ⋅dxdξ+(n+1)[(σc26γg)ξ2θ−αQ]xξ2

where:    Q(ξ)≡−dln⁡θdln⁡ξ,    σc2≡3ω22πGρc,     and,     α≡(3−4γg)

For an isolated n = 1 (γg=2,α=1) polytrope, we know that,

θ

=

sin⁡ξξ

    ⇒Q(ξ)≡−dln⁡θdln⁡ξ

=

[1−ξcot⁡ξ].

Hence, the relevant LAWE is,

0

=

d2xdξ2+[4−2(1−ξcot⁡ξ)]1ξ⋅dxdξ+2[(σc212)ξ3sin⁡ξ−(1−ξcot⁡ξ)]xξ2

LAWE for n = 1 Polytrope

0

=

d2xdξ2+2ξ[1+ξcot⁡ξ]dxdξ+12[(σc23)ξsin⁡ξ−4ξ2(1−ξcot⁡ξ)]x

This matches precisely the expression derived immediately above.

Surface boundary condition:

−dln⁡xdln⁡ξ|surf

=

(3−nn+1)+nσc26(n+1)[ξθ′]surf

⇒−dln⁡xdln⁡ξ|surf

=

1+σc212[ξ3(ξcos⁡ξ−sin⁡ξ)]ξ=π=1−π2σc212

Attempt at Deriving an Analytic Eigenvector Solution

Multiplying the last expression through by ξ2sin⁡ξ gives,

(ξ2sin⁡ξ)d2xdξ2+2[ξsin⁡ξ+ξ2cos⁡ξ]dxdξ+[σ2ξ3−2α(sin⁡ξ−ξcos⁡ξ)]x=0,


where,

σ2

≡

ω22πGρcγg,

α

≡

3−4γg.

The first two terms can be folded together to give,

1ξ2sin2ξ⋅ddξ[ξ2sin2ξdxdξ]

=

1ξ2sin⁡ξ[2α(sin⁡ξ−ξcos⁡ξ)−σ2ξ3]x

 

=

−[2αξ2(ξcos⁡ξsin⁡ξ−1)+σ2(ξsin⁡ξ)]x

 

=

−[2αξ2ξ2sin⁡ξ⋅ddξ(sin⁡ξξ)+σ2(ξsin⁡ξ)]x

 

=

−[2αξddξ(sin⁡ξξ)+σ2](ξsin⁡ξ)x,

where, in order to make this next-to-last step, we have recognized that,

ddξ(sin⁡ξξ)

=

sin⁡ξξ2[ξcos⁡ξsin⁡ξ−1].

It would seem that the eigenfunction, x(ξ), should be expressible in terms of trigonometric functions and powers of ξ; indeed, it appears as though the expression governing this eigenfunction would simplify considerably if x∝sin⁡ξ/ξ. With this in mind, we have made some attempts to guess the exact form of the eigenfunction. Here is one such attempt.

First Guess (n1)

Let's try,

x=sin⁡ξξ,

which means,

x'≡dxdξ

=

sin⁡ξξ2[ξcos⁡ξsin⁡ξ−1].

Does this satisfy the governing expression? Let's see. The right-and-side (RHS) gives:

RHS

=

−[2αξddξ(sin⁡ξξ)+σ2](ξsin⁡ξ)x=−[2αx'ξ+σ2].

At the same time, the left-hand-side (LHS) may, quite generically, be written as:

LHS

=

x'ξ{ξ(ξ2sin2ξ)x'⋅d[(ξ2sin2ξ)x']dξ}

 

=

x'ξ[dln⁡[(ξ2sin⁡2ξ)x']dln⁡ξ].

Putting the two sides together therefore gives,

x'ξ[dln⁡[(ξ2sin⁡2ξ)x']dln⁡ξ+2α]

=

−σ2

⇒[dln⁡[(ξ2sin⁡2ξ)x']1/(2α)dln⁡ξ+1]

=

−σ22α(ξx')

⇒dln⁡[(ξ2sin⁡2ξ)x']−1/(2α)dln⁡ξ

=

1+σ22α(ξx').

[Comment from J. E. Tohline on 6 April 2015: I'm not sure what else to make of this.]

Second Guess (n1)

Adopting the generic rewriting of the LHS, and leaving the RHS fully generic as well, we have,

x'ξ[dln⁡[(ξ2sin⁡2ξ)x']dln⁡ξ]

=

−[2αξddξ(sin⁡ξξ)+σ2](ξsin⁡ξ)x

⇒x'x[dln⁡[(ξ2sin⁡2ξ)x']dln⁡ξ]

=

−2α(ξsin⁡ξ)ddξ(sin⁡ξξ)−σ2(ξ2sin⁡ξ)

⇒dln⁡(x)dln⁡ξ[dln⁡[(ξ2sin⁡2ξ)x']dln⁡ξ]

=

−2α[dln⁡(sin⁡ξ/ξ)dln⁡ξ]−σ2(ξ3sin⁡ξ).

⇒−σ2

=

(sin⁡ξξ3){dln⁡(x)dln⁡ξ[dln⁡[(ξ2sin⁡2ξ)x']dln⁡ξ]+2α[dln⁡(sin⁡ξ/ξ)dln⁡ξ]}.

[Comment from J. E. Tohline on 6 April 2015: I'm not sure what else to make of this.]


Third Guess (n1)

Let's rewrite the polytropic (n = 1) wave equation as follows:

sin⁡ξ[ξ2x'′+2ξx'−2αx]+cos⁡ξ[2ξ2x'+2αξx]+σ2ξ3x=0.

It is difficult to determine what term in the adiabatic wave equation will cancel the term involving σ2 because its leading coefficient is ξ3 and no other term contains a power of ξ that is higher than two. After thinking through various trial eigenvector expressions, x(ξ), I have determined that a function of the following form has a chance of working because the second derivative of the function generates a leading factor of ξ3 while the function itself does not introduce any additional factors of ξ into the term that contains σ2:

x

=

[asin2(ξ5/2)+bsin⁡(ξ5/2)cos⁡(ξ5/2)+ccos⁡2(ξ5/2)][Asin⁡ξ+Bcos⁡ξ]

⇒x'

=

[asin2(ξ5/2)+bsin⁡(ξ5/2)cos⁡(ξ5/2)+ccos⁡2(ξ5/2)]⋅d[Asin⁡ξ+Bcos⁡ξ]dξ

 

 

+d[asin2(ξ5/2)+bsin⁡(ξ5/2)cos⁡(ξ5/2)+ccos⁡2(ξ5/2)]dξ⋅[Asin⁡ξ+Bcos⁡ξ]

 

=

[asin2(ξ5/2)+bsin⁡(ξ5/2)cos⁡(ξ5/2)+ccos⁡2(ξ5/2)]⋅d[Asin⁡ξ+Bcos⁡ξ]dξ

 

 

+[Asin⁡ξ+Bcos⁡ξ]{5aξ3/2sin⁡(ξ5/2)cos⁡(ξ5/2)+b[52ξ3/2cos⁡2(ξ5/2)−52ξ3/2sin⁡2(ξ5/2)]−5cξ3/2sin⁡(ξ5/2)cos⁡(ξ5/2)}

 

=

[asin2(ξ5/2)+bsin⁡(ξ5/2)cos⁡(ξ5/2)+ccos⁡2(ξ5/2)]⋅d[Asin⁡ξ+Bcos⁡ξ]dξ

 

 

+[Asin⁡ξ+Bcos⁡ξ]{5(a−c)ξ3/2sin⁡(ξ5/2)cos⁡(ξ5/2)+5b2ξ3/2[1−2sin⁡2(ξ5/2)]}

⇒x'′

=

[asin2(ξ5/2)+bsin⁡(ξ5/2)cos⁡(ξ5/2)+ccos⁡2(ξ5/2)]⋅d2[Asin⁡ξ+Bcos⁡ξ]d2ξ

 

 

+{5(a−c)ξ3/2sin⁡(ξ5/2)cos⁡(ξ5/2)+5b2ξ3/2[1−2sin⁡2(ξ5/2)]}⋅d[Asin⁡ξ+Bcos⁡ξ]dξ

 

 

+[Asin⁡ξ+Bcos⁡ξ]{152(a−c)ξ1/2sin⁡(ξ5/2)cos⁡(ξ5/2)+252(a−c)ξ3cos⁡2(ξ5/2)−252(a−c)ξ3sin⁡2(ξ5/2)

 

 

+15b4ξ1/2[1−2sin2(ξ5/2)]−25bξ3sin⁡(ξ5/2)cos⁡(ξ5/2)}

 

=

[asin2(ξ5/2)+bsin⁡(ξ5/2)cos⁡(ξ5/2)+ccos⁡2(ξ5/2)]⋅d2[Asin⁡ξ+Bcos⁡ξ]d2ξ

 

 

+{5(a−c)ξ3/2sin⁡(ξ5/2)cos⁡(ξ5/2)+5b2ξ3/2[1−2sin⁡2(ξ5/2)]}⋅d[Asin⁡ξ+Bcos⁡ξ]dξ

 

 

+[Asin⁡ξ+Bcos⁡ξ]{154ξ1/2[2(a−c)sin⁡(ξ5/2)cos⁡(ξ5/2)+b(1−2sin⁡2(ξ5/2))]

 

 

+252ξ3[−2bsin⁡(ξ5/2)cos⁡(ξ5/2)+(a−c)(1−2sin⁡2(ξ5/2))]}

[Comment from J. E. Tohline on 9 April 2015: I'm not sure what else to make of this.]

[Additional comment from J. E. Tohline on 15 April 2015: It is perhaps worth mentioning that there is a similarity between the argument of the trigonometric function being used in this "third guess" and the Lane-Emden function derived by Srivastava for n=5 polytropes; and also a similarity between Srivastava's function and the functional form of the LHS that we constructed, above, in connection with our "second guess."]

Fourth Guess (n1)

Again, working with the polytropic (n = 1) wave equation written in the following form,

sin⁡ξ[ξ2x'′+2ξx'−2αx]+cos⁡ξ[2ξ2x'+2αξx]+σ2ξ3x=0.

Now, let's try:

x=a0+b1ξsin⁡ξ+c2ξ2cos⁡ξ,

which means,

x'

=

b1sin⁡ξ+b1ξcos⁡ξ+2c2ξcos⁡ξ−c2ξ2sin⁡ξ

 

=

(b1−c2ξ2)sin⁡ξ+(b1+2c2)ξcos⁡ξ,

x'′

=

(−2c2ξ)sin⁡ξ+(b1−c2ξ2)cos⁡ξ+(b1+2c2)cos⁡ξ−(b1+2c2)ξsin⁡ξ

 

=

−(2c2+b1+2c2)ξsin⁡ξ+(2b1+2c2−c2ξ2)cos⁡ξ.

The LHS of the wave equation then becomes,

LHS

=

sin⁡ξ{ξ2[−(2c2+b1+2c2)ξsin⁡ξ+(2b1+2c2−c2ξ2)cos⁡ξ]+2ξ[(b1−c2ξ2)sin⁡ξ+(b1+2c2)ξcos⁡ξ]−2α[a0+(b1ξ)sin⁡ξ+(c2ξ2)cos⁡ξ]}

 

 

+cos⁡ξ{2ξ2[(b1−c2ξ2)sin⁡ξ+(b1+2c2)ξcos⁡ξ]+2αξ[a0+(b1ξ)sin⁡ξ+(c2ξ2)cos⁡ξ]}+σ2ξ3[a0+b1ξsin⁡ξ+c2ξ2cos⁡ξ]

 

=

sin⁡ξ{[−(2c2+b1+2c2)ξ3sin⁡ξ+(2b1+2c2−c2ξ2)ξ2cos⁡ξ]+[2(b1−c2ξ2)ξsin⁡ξ+2(b1+2c2)ξ2cos⁡ξ]−2α[a0+(b1ξ)sin⁡ξ+(c2ξ2)cos⁡ξ]}

 

 

+cos⁡ξ{[2(b1−c2ξ2)ξ2sin⁡ξ+2(b1+2c2)ξ3cos⁡ξ]+[2a0αξ+2b1αξ2sin⁡ξ+2c2αξ3cos⁡ξ]}+σ2[a0ξ3+b1ξ4sin⁡ξ+c2ξ5cos⁡ξ]

 

=

sin⁡ξ{−2αa0+[−(2c2+b1+2c2)ξ3+2(b1−c2ξ2)ξ−2α(b1ξ)]sin⁡ξ+[(2b1+2c2−c2ξ2)ξ2+2(b1+2c2)ξ2−2α(c2ξ2)]cos⁡ξ}

 

 

+cos⁡ξ{+2a0αξ+[2(b1−c2ξ2)ξ2+2b1αξ2]sin⁡ξ+[2(b1+2c2)ξ3+2c2αξ3]cos⁡ξ}+σ2[a0ξ3+b1ξ4sin⁡ξ+c2ξ5cos⁡ξ]

 

=

σ2a0ξ3+[−(2c2+b1+2c2)ξ3+2(b1−c2ξ2)ξ−2α(b1ξ)]sin2ξ+[2(b1+2c2)ξ3+2c2αξ3](1−sin2ξ)

 

 

+[(2b1+2c2−c2ξ2)ξ2+2(b1+2c2)ξ2−2α(c2ξ2)]sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ+[2(b1−c2ξ2)ξ2+2b1αξ2]sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ

 

 

+σ2[b1ξ4sin⁡ξ+c2ξ5cos⁡ξ]+2a0αξcos⁡ξ−2αa0sin⁡ξ

 

=

[σ2a0+2(b1+2c2)+2c2α]ξ3+{+2(b1)ξ−2α(b1ξ)+[−2c2−2(b1+2c2)−2c2α−(2c2+b1+2c2)]ξ3}sin2ξ

 

 

+{[(2b1+2c2)+2(b1+2c2)−2α(c2)+2(b1)+2b1α]ξ2−3c2ξ4}sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ

 

 

+sin⁡ξ[σ2b1ξ4−2αa0]+ξcos⁡ξ[σ2c2ξ4+2a0α]

 

=

[σ2a0+2(b1+2c2)+2c2α]ξ3+{2b1(1−α)−[2c2(5+α)+3b1]ξ2}ξsin2ξ

 

 

+{2(3−α)(b1+c2)−3c2ξ2}ξ2sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ+sin⁡ξ[σ2b1ξ4−2αa0]+ξcos⁡ξ[σ2c2ξ4+2a0α].

Fifth Guess (n1)

Along a similar line of reasoning, let's try a function of the form,

x

=

xssin⁡ξ+xccos⁡ξ+x1sin⁡2ξ+x2cos⁡2ξ+x3sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ,

where xs,xc,x1,x2, and x3 are five separate, as yet, unspecified (polynomial?) functions of ξ. This also means that,

x'

=

(xs'−xc)sin⁡ξ+(xc'+xs)cos⁡ξ+(x1'−x3)sin⁡2ξ+(x2'+x3)cos⁡2ξ+(x3'+2x1−2x2)sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ;

and,

x'′

=

(xs'′−2xc'−xs)sin⁡ξ+(xc'′+2xs'−xc)cos⁡ξ+(x1'′−2x3'−2x1+2x2)sin⁡2ξ+(x2'′+2x3'+2x1−2x2)cos⁡2ξ+(x3'′+4x1'−4x2'−4x3)sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ.

Hence the LHS of the polytropic (n = 1) wave equation becomes,

LHS

=

sin⁡ξ{ξ2[(xs'′−2xc'−xs)sin⁡ξ+(xc'′+2xs'−xc)cos⁡ξ+(x1'′−2x3'−2x1+2x2)sin⁡2ξ+(x2'′+2x3'+2x1−2x2)cos⁡2ξ+(x3'′+4x1'−4x2'−4x3)sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ]

 

 

+2ξ[(xs'−xc)sin⁡ξ+(xc'+xs)cos⁡ξ+(x1'−x3)sin⁡2ξ+(x2'+x3)cos⁡2ξ+(x3'+2x1−2x2)sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ]

 

 

−2α[xssin⁡ξ+xccos⁡ξ+x1sin⁡2ξ+x2cos⁡2ξ+x3sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ]}

 

 

+cos⁡ξ{2ξ2[(xs'−xc)sin⁡ξ+(xc'+xs)cos⁡ξ+(x1'−x3)sin⁡2ξ+(x2'+x3)cos⁡2ξ+(x3'+2x1−2x2)sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ]

 

 

+2αξ[xssin⁡ξ+xccos⁡ξ+x1sin⁡2ξ+x2cos⁡2ξ+x3sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ]}

 

 

+σ2ξ3{xssin⁡ξ+xccos⁡ξ+x1sin⁡2ξ+x2cos⁡2ξ+x3sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ}

 

=

[(xs'′−2xc'−xs)ξ2+2ξ(xs'−xc)−2αxs+σ2ξ3x1]sin2ξ+[(xc'′+2xs'−xc)ξ2+2ξ(xc'+xs)−2αxc+2ξ2(xs'−xc)+2αξxs+σ2ξ3x3]sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ

 

 

+[(x1'′−2x3'−2x1+2x2)ξ2+2ξ(x1'−x3)−2αx1]sin3ξ+[(x2'′+2x3'+2x1−2x2)ξ2+2ξ(x2'+x3)−2αx2+2ξ2(x3'+2x1−2x2)+2αξx3]sin⁡ξcos⁡2ξ

 

 

+[(x3'′+4x1'−4x2'−4x3)ξ2+2ξ(x3'+2x1−2x2)−2αx3+2ξ2(x1'−x3)+2αξx1]sin2ξcos⁡ξ

 

 

+[2ξ2(xc'+xs)+2αξxc+σ2ξ3x2]cos2ξ+[2ξ2(x2'+x3)+2αξx2]cos3ξ+σ2ξ3xssin⁡ξ+σ2ξ3xccos⁡ξ

 

=

[(xs'′−2xc'−xs)ξ2+2ξ(xs'−xc)−2αxs+σ2ξ3x1]sin2ξ+[(xc'′+2xs'−xc)ξ2+2ξ(xc'+xs)−2αxc+2ξ2(xs'−xc)+2αξxs+σ2ξ3x3]sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ

 

 

+[(x1'′−2x3'−2x1+2x2)ξ2+2ξ(x1'−x3)−2αx1+σ2ξ3xs]sin⁡ξ

 

 

+[(x2'′+2x3'+2x1−2x2)ξ2+2ξ(x2'+x3)−2αx2+2ξ2(x3'+2x1−2x2)+2αξx3−(x1'′−2x3'−2x1+2x2)ξ2−2ξ(x1'−x3)+2αx1]sin⁡ξcos⁡2ξ

 

 

+[(x3'′+4x1'−4x2'−4x3)ξ2+2ξ(x3'+2x1−2x2)−2αx3+2ξ2(x1'−x3)+2αξx1−2ξ2(x2'+x3)−2αξx2]sin2ξcos⁡ξ

 

 

+[2ξ2(xc'+xs)+2αξxc+σ2ξ3x2]cos2ξ+[2ξ2(x2'+x3)+2αξx2+σ2ξ3xc]cos⁡ξ

So, the five chosen (polynomial?) functions of ξ must simultabeously satisfy the following, seven 2nd-order ODEs:

sin⁡ξ

      :      

(x1'′−2x3'−2x1+2x2)ξ2+2ξ(x1'−x3)−2αx1+σ2ξ3xs=0

sin2ξ

      :      

(xs'′−2xc'−xs)ξ2+2ξ(xs'−xc)−2αxs+σ2ξ3x1=0

sin2ξcos⁡ξ

      :      

(x3'′+4x1'−4x2'−4x3)ξ2+2ξ(x3'+2x1−2x2)−2αx3+2ξ2(x1'−x3)+2αξx1−2ξ2(x2'+x3)−2αξx2=0

sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ

      :      

(xc'′+2xs'−xc)ξ2+2ξ(xc'+xs)−2αxc+2ξ2(xs'−xc)+2αξxs+σ2ξ3x3=0

sin⁡ξcos⁡2ξ

      :      

(x2'′+2x3'+2x1−2x2)ξ2+2ξ(x2'+x3)−2αx2+2ξ2(x3'+2x1−2x2)+2αξx3−(x1'′−2x3'−2x1+2x2)ξ2−2ξ(x1'−x3)+2αx1=0

cos2ξ

      :      

2ξ2(xc'+xs)+2αξxc+σ2ξ3x2=0

cos⁡ξ

      :      

2ξ2(x2'+x3)+2αξx2+σ2ξ3xc=0

Example 1

Let's work on the coefficient of the cos⁡ξ term:

xc

=

ξβ(Ac)

x2

=

ξβ(C2ξ2)

x3

=

ξβ(B3ξ)

⇒       Coefficient of "cos⁡ξ" term

=

ξβ[2ξ2(2C2ξ+(B3ξ))+2αξ(C2ξ2)+σ2ξ3(Ac)]

 

=

ξβ+3[2(2C2+B3)+2αC2+σ2(Ac)]

⇒σ2

=

−2Ac[B3+(2+α)C2]

Sixth Guess (n1)

Rationale

From our review of the properties of n=1 polytropic spheres, we know that the equilibrium density distribution is given by the sinc function, namely,

ρρc

=

sin⁡ξξ,

where,

ξ≡π(r0R0).

The total mass is,

Mtot=4π⋅ρcR03,

and the fractional mass enclosed within a given radius, r, is,

Mr(ξ)Mtot

=

1π[sin⁡ξ−ξcos⁡ξ].

Let's guess that, during the fundamental mode of radial oscillation, the sinc-function profile is preserved as the system's total radius varies. In particular, we will assume that the system's time-varying radius is,

R=R0(1+δRR0)=R0(1+ϵR),

and seek to determine how the displacement vector, ϵ≡δr/r0, varies with r0 in order to preserve the overall sinc-function profile. As is usual, we will only examine small perturbations away from equilibrium, that is, we will assume that everywhere throughout the configuration, |ϵ|≪1.


Let's begin by defining a new dimensionless coordinate,

η≡π(rR)=π[r0(1+ϵ)R0(1+ϵR)]≈ξ(1+ϵ),

and recognize that, in the new perturbed state, the fractional mass enclosed within a given radius, r, is,

Mr(η)Mtot

=

1π[sin⁡η−ηcos⁡η].

In order to associate each mass shell in the perturbed configuration with its corresponding mass shell in the unperturbed, equilibrium state, we need to set the two Mr functions equal to one another, that is, demand that,

sin⁡ξ−ξcos⁡ξ

=

sin⁡η−ηcos⁡η

 

≈

sin⁡[ξ(1+ϵ)]−ξ(1+ϵ)cos⁡[ξ(1+ϵ)]

 

=

[sin⁡ξcos⁡(ξϵ)+cos⁡ξsin⁡(ξϵ)]−ξ(1+ϵ)[cos⁡ξcos⁡(ξϵ)−sin⁡ξsin⁡(ξϵ)]

 

≈

sin⁡ξ[1−12(ξϵ)2]+(ξϵ)cos⁡ξ−ξ(1+ϵ)cos⁡ξ[1−12(ξϵ)2]+ξ2ϵ(1+ϵ)sin⁡ξ

 

≈

sin⁡ξ−ξcos⁡ξ−12(ξϵ)2sin⁡ξ+(ξϵ)cos⁡ξ−(ξϵ)cos⁡ξ+12ξ3ϵ2cos⁡ξ+ξ2ϵsin⁡ξ+(ξϵ)2sin⁡ξ

⇒−ξ2ϵsin⁡ξ

≈

(ξϵ)22[ξcos⁡ξ+sin⁡ξ]

⇒1ϵ

≈

−12[ξ⋅cos⁡ξsin⁡ξ+1]

⇒ϵ

≈

−2[1+ξ⋅cos⁡ξsin⁡ξ]−1=−2sin⁡ξ[sin⁡ξ+ξcos⁡ξ]−1.

Resulting Polytropic Wave Equation

So, let's try,

x

=

2sin⁡ξ[sin⁡ξ+ξcos⁡ξ]−1

 

=

[sin⁡ξ+ξcos⁡ξ]−32sin⁡ξ[sin⁡2ξ+2ξsin⁡ξcos⁡ξ+ξ2cos⁡2ξ],

in which case,

x'

=

2cos⁡ξ[sin⁡ξ+ξcos⁡ξ]−1−2sin⁡ξ[sin⁡ξ+ξcos⁡ξ]−2[2cos⁡ξ−ξsin⁡ξ]

 

=

[sin⁡ξ+ξcos⁡ξ]−2{2cos⁡ξ[sin⁡ξ+ξcos⁡ξ]−2sin⁡ξ[2cos⁡ξ−ξsin⁡ξ]}

 

=

[sin⁡ξ+ξcos⁡ξ]−2[2cos⁡ξsin⁡ξ+2ξcos⁡2ξ−4sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ+2ξsin⁡2ξ]

 

=

2[sin⁡ξ+ξcos⁡ξ]−2[ξ−sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ]

 

=

[sin⁡ξ+ξcos⁡ξ]−32[ξsin⁡ξ+ξ2cos⁡ξ−sin⁡2ξcos⁡ξ−ξsin⁡ξcos⁡2ξ],

and,

x'′

=

2[sin⁡ξ+ξcos⁡ξ]−2[1−cos⁡2ξ+sin⁡2ξ]−4[sin⁡ξ+ξcos⁡ξ]−3[ξ−sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ][2cos⁡ξ−ξsin⁡ξ]

 

=

4[sin⁡ξ+ξcos⁡ξ]−3{sin⁡2ξ[sin⁡ξ+ξcos⁡ξ]−[ξ−sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ][2cos⁡ξ−ξsin⁡ξ]}

 

=

4[sin⁡ξ+ξcos⁡ξ]−3[sin⁡3ξ+ξsin⁡ξcos⁡ξ+ξ2sin⁡ξ−2ξcos⁡ξ−ξsin⁡2ξcos⁡ξ+2sin⁡ξcos⁡2ξ]

Graphical Reassessment

Before plowing ahead and plugging these expressions into the polytropic wave equation, I plotted the trial eigenfunction,

ϵ(ξ/π)

(see the blue curve in the accompanying "Trial Eigenfunction" figure), and noticed that it passes through

±∞

midway through the configuration. This is a very unphysical behavior. On the other hand, the inverse of this function (see the red curve) exhibits a relatively desirable behavior because it increases monotonically from negative one at the center. As plotted, however, the function has one node. In searching for the eigenfunction of the fundamental mode of oscillation, it might be better to add "1" to the inverse of the function and thereby get rid of all nodes. (Keep in mind, however, that the red curve might be displaying the eigenfunction associated with the first overtone.)

Let's therefore try,

x=1+1ϵ=1−12[ξ⋅cos⁡ξsin⁡ξ+1]=12[1−ξ⋅cos⁡ξsin⁡ξ].

In this case we have,

x'

=

12[ξ−cos⁡ξsin⁡ξ+ξ⋅cos2ξsin2ξ]

 

=

12sin2ξ[ξsin2ξ−sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ+ξcos⁡2ξ],

 

=

12sin2ξ[ξ−sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ],

and,

x'′

=

−cos⁡ξsin3ξ[ξ−sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ]+12sin2ξ[1−cos⁡2ξ+sin⁡2ξ]

 

=

1−cos⁡ξsin3ξ[ξ−sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ].

Now let's plug these expressions into the polytropic (n = 1) wave equation, namely,

−σ2ξ3x

=

sin⁡ξ[ξ2x'′+2ξx'−2αx]+cos⁡ξ[2ξ2x'+2αξx].

The first term inside the square brackets on the right-hand-side gives,

ξ2x'′+2ξx'−2αx

=

ξ2−cos⁡ξsin3ξ(ξ3−ξ2sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ)+1sin2ξ(ξ2−ξsin⁡ξcos⁡ξ)−α(1−ξ⋅cos⁡ξsin⁡ξ)

 

=

1sin3ξ[ξ2sin3ξ−cos⁡ξ(ξ3−ξ2sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ)+sin⁡ξ(ξ2−ξsin⁡ξcos⁡ξ)−α(sin⁡3ξ−ξcos⁡ξsin⁡2ξ)]

 

=

1sin3ξ[ξ2sin⁡ξ(1−cos⁡2ξ)+ξ2sin⁡ξcos⁡2ξ−ξ3cos⁡ξ+ξ2sin⁡ξ−ξsin⁡2ξcos⁡ξ−αsin⁡3ξ+αξcos⁡ξsin⁡2ξ]

 

=

−α+1sin3ξ[2ξ2sin⁡ξ−ξ3cos⁡ξ−ξsin⁡2ξcos⁡ξ+αξcos⁡ξsin⁡2ξ];

and the second term inside the square brackets on the right-hand-side gives,

2ξ2x'+2αξx

=

1sin2ξ(ξ3−ξ2sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ)+αsin⁡ξ(ξsin⁡ξ−ξ2cos⁡ξ).

Put together, then, we have,

RHS

=

1sin2ξ[2ξ2sin⁡ξ−ξ3cos⁡ξ−ξsin⁡2ξcos⁡ξ+αξcos⁡ξsin⁡2ξ]+cos⁡ξsin2ξ(ξ3−ξ2sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ)−αsin⁡ξ+α⋅cos⁡ξsin⁡ξ(ξsin⁡ξ−ξ2cos⁡ξ)

 

=

1sin2ξ[2ξ2sin⁡ξ−ξ3cos⁡ξ−ξsin⁡2ξcos⁡ξ+αξcos⁡ξsin⁡2ξ+ξ3cos⁡ξ−ξ2sin⁡ξcos⁡2ξ]+αsin⁡ξ[−sin⁡2ξ+ξsin⁡ξcos⁡ξ−ξ2cos⁡2ξ]

 

=

ξsin⁡ξ[2ξ−sin⁡ξcos⁡ξ−ξcos⁡2ξ]−αsin⁡ξ[sin⁡2ξ+ξ2cos⁡2ξ]

 

=

ξ2sin⁡ξ[1+sin2ξ−(sin⁡ξξ)cos⁡ξ−α(sin2ξξ2+cos⁡2ξ)],

and,

LHS

=

−ξσ22(ξ2sin⁡ξ)[sin⁡ξ−ξcos⁡ξ].

If our trial eigenfunction is a proper solution to the polytropic wave equation, then the difference of these two expressions should be zero. Let's see:

sin⁡ξξ2(RHS−LHS)

=

1+sin2ξ−(sin⁡ξξ)cos⁡ξ−α(sin2ξξ2+cos⁡2ξ)+ξσ22[sin⁡ξ−ξcos⁡ξ].

This expression clearly is not zero, so our trial eigenfunction is not a good one. However, the terms in the wave equation did combine somewhat to give a fairly compact — albeit nonzero — expression. So we may be on the right track!


See Also

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |