SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/RedGiantToPN/Pt4: Difference between revisions
| Line 312: | Line 312: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
Combining variable expressions from the above right-hand column, we find that for <math>n=5</math> polytropes, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>\frac{g_0 \rho_0 r_0}{P_0}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
(2^3\cdot 3 \pi)^{1 / 2}\biggl[K_5 G \cdot \rho_c^{6/5} \biggr]^{1/2}\biggl(-~ \frac{d\theta}{d\xi}\biggr) \biggr] | |||
\cdot \rho_c \theta^5 | |||
\cdot \biggl[\frac{K_5}{G} \cdot \rho_c^{-4/5} \biggr]^{1/2} \biggl(\frac{3}{2\pi}\biggr)^{1 / 2} \xi | |||
~\biggl[K_5\rho_c^{6/5} \theta^{6} \biggr]^{-1} | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
<table border="1" align="center" cellpadding="5" width="80%"><tr><td align="left"> | <table border="1" align="center" cellpadding="5" width="80%"><tr><td align="left"> | ||
More generally, combining variable expressions from the above left-hand column, we find, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | ||
Revision as of 18:31, 24 January 2026
Main Sequence to Red Giant to Planetary Nebula
Part I: Background & Objective
|
Part II:
|
Part III:
|
Part IV:
|
Succinct
Generic
may also be written as …
|
|
|
|
In shorthand, we can rewrite this equation in the form,
|
|
|
|
where,
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
and,
and,
|
|
|
|
Specific Polytropes
In a separate discussion, we have shown that configurations with a polytropic equation of state exhibit a characteristic length scale that is given by the expression,
|
|
|
|
and, once the dimensionless polytropic temperature, , is known, the radial dependence of key physical variables is given by the expressions,
|
if, as in a separate discussion, and … |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Combining variable expressions from the above right-hand column, we find that for polytropes,
|
|
|
|
|
More generally, combining variable expressions from the above left-hand column, we find,
|
As a result, for polytropes we can write,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, multiplying through by — which everywhere converts to — gives, what we will refer to as the,
BiPolytrope
Let's stick with the dimensional version and set , in which case the Polytropic LAWE is,
|
|
|
|
Core (n = 5)
For the core, we know that . Hence,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now, given that,
|
|
|
|
we can everywhere make the substitution,
|
|
|
|
Note, also, that throughout the core, the relevant LAWE is,
|
|
|
|
Envelope (n = 1)
For the envelope, we know from separate work that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Discussions
- Instability Onset Overview
- Analytic
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |