SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/RedGiantToPN: Difference between revisions

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Line 773: Line 773:
   <td align="left">1.00124818</td>
   <td align="left">1.00124818</td>
   <td align="left">3.141592582</td>
   <td align="left">3.141592582</td>
   <td align="left">2.531</td>
   <td align="left">2.510</td>
   <td align="left">1.016544524</td>
   <td align="left">0.0009044</td>
   <td align="left">1.253</td>
   <td align="left">1.253</td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 783: Line 783:
   <td align="left">1.0097655</td>
   <td align="left">1.0097655</td>
   <td align="left">3.141580334</td>
   <td align="left">3.141580334</td>
   <td align="left">2.510</td>
   <td align="left">2.531</td>
   <td align="left">1.002085</td>
   <td align="left">0.0071264</td>
   <td align="left">1.253</td>
   <td align="left">1.253</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center">19</td>
  <td align="left">1.6799927</td>
  <td align="left">0.7178117</td>
  <td align="left">1.566601145</td>
  <td align="left">2.775921455</td>
  <td align="left">3.470</td>
  <td align="left">0.719947375</td>
  <td align="left">1.107</td>
</tr>
</tr>
</table>
</table>

Revision as of 16:11, 20 November 2025

Main Sequence to Red Giant to Planetary Nebula

Preface

In terms of mass (m), length (ℓ), and time (t), the units of various physical constants and variables are:

Mass-density

∼

mℓ−3

Pressure (energy-density)

∼

mℓ−1t−2

Newtonian gravitational constant, G

∼

m−1ℓ3t−2

The core's polytropic constant, Kc

∼

[m−1ℓ13t−10]1/5

The envelope's polytropic constant, Ke

∼

m−1ℓ5t−2


As a result, for example (see details below), if we hold the central-density (ρ0) — as well as G and Kc — constant along an equilibrium sequence, mass will scale as …

Mass

∼

[Kc3/2G−3/2ρ0−1/5]

 

∼

{[m−1ℓ13t−10]1/5}3/2[m−1ℓ3t−2]−3/2[mℓ−3]−1/5

 

∼

[m−3/10+3/2−1/5][ℓ39/10−9/2+3/5][t−3+3]

 

∼

[m+1][ℓ0][t0].

If instead (see details below) we hold Ke — as well as G and Kc — constant along an equilibrium sequence, mass will scale as …

Mass

∼

[Kc5KeG−6]1/4

 

∼

{[m−1ℓ13t−10][m−1ℓ5t−2][m−1ℓ3t−2]−6}1/4

 

∼

{[m−1−1+6][ℓ13+5−18][t−10−2+12]}1/4

 

∼

[m+1][ℓ0][t0].

Original Model Construction

Fixed Central Density

From Examples, we find,

Mcore=Mcore*[Kc3/2G−3/2ρ0−1/5]

=

[Kc3/2G−3/2ρ0−1/5](6π)1/2(ξiθi)3;

Mtot=Mtot*[Kc3/2G−3/2ρ0−1/5]

=

[Kc3/2G−3/2ρ0−1/5](μeμc)−2(2π)1/2Aηsθi;

rcore=rcore*[Kc1/2G−1/2ρ0−2/5]

=

[Kc1/2G−1/2ρ0−2/5](32π)1/2ξi;

R=rs*[Kc1/2G−1/2ρ0−2/5]

=

[Kc1/2G−1/2ρ0−2/5](μeμc)−1ηs2πθi2;

where, rewriting the relevant expressions in terms of the parameters,

ℓi≡ξi3;       and       m3≡3(μeμc),

we find,

θi

=

(1+ℓi2)−1/2

ηi

=

(μeμc)3θi2ξi=m3(ℓi1+ℓi2)

Λi

=

1ηi−ξi3=[1+ℓi2m3ℓi]−ℓi=1m3ℓi[1+(1−m3)ℓi2]

A2

=

ηi2(1+Λi2)

 

=

m32(ℓi1+ℓi2)2⋅(1+ℓi2)m32ℓi2[1+(1−m3)2ℓi2]

 

=

[1+(1−m3)2ℓi21+ℓi2]

ηs

=

π2+ηi+tan−1(Λi)

Fixed Interface Pressure

Equilibrium Sequence Expressions

From the relevant interface conditions, we find,

(KeKc)

=

ρ0−4/5(μeμc)−2θi−4.

Inverting this last expression gives,

ρ04/5

=

(μeμc)−2θi−4(KeKc)−1

⇒ρ01/5

=

[(μeμc)−1/2θi−1(KeKc)−1/4].

Hence, keeping Kc and Ke constant, we have,

Mcore

=

[Kc3/2G−3/2(KeKc)1/4][(μeμc)1/2θi](6π)1/2(ξiθi)3

 

=

[Kc5KeG−6]1/4(μeμc)1/2(6π)1/2ξi3θi4;

Mtot

=

[Kc3/2G−3/2(KeKc)1/4][(μeμc)1/2θi](μeμc)−2(2π)1/2Aηsθi

 

=

[Kc5KeG−6]1/4(μeμc)−3/2(2π)1/2Aηs;

rcore

=

[KeG−1]1/2(μeμc)(32π)1/2ξiθi2;

R

=

[KeG−1]1/2ηs2π;

ρ0

=

[KeKc]−5/4(μeμc)−5/2θi−5;

Pi

=

[Kc][(μeμc)−3θi−6(KeKc)−3/2]θi6

 

=

[Kc5Ke−3]1/2(μeμc)−3.

This last expression shows that if Kc and Ke are both held fixed, then the interface pressure, Pi, will be constant along the sequence of equilibrium models.

Note also:

ν≡McoreMtot

=

{[Kc5KeG−6]1/4(μeμc)1/2(6π)1/2ξi3θi4}{[Kc5KeG−6]1/4(μeμc)−3/2(2π)1/2Aηs}−1

 

=

(μeμc)23ξi3θi4Aηs;

q≡rcoreR

=

{[KeG−1]1/2(μeμc)(32π)1/2ξiθi2}{[KeG−1]1/2ηs2π}−1

 

=

(μeμc)3ξiθi2ηs.

Sequence Plots

A plot of Mtot[Kc5KeG−6]−1/4 versus R[KeG−1]−1/2 at fixed interface pressure will be generated via the relations,

Ordinate   Abscissa

(μeμc)−3/2(2π)1/2Aηs

vs

ηs2π.

Alternatively, a plot of Mtot[Kc5KeG−6]−1/4 versus log10(ρ0)[KeKc]5/4 at fixed interface pressure will be generated via the relations,

Ordinate   Abscissa

(μeμc)−3/2(2π)1/2Aηs

vs

log10[(μeμc)−5/2θi−5]

file = Dropbox/WorkFolder/Wiki edits/BiPolytrope/TwoFirstOrderODEs/Bipolytrope51New.xlsx --- worksheet = SequenceMuRatio100
file = Dropbox/WorkFolder/Wiki edits/BiPolytrope/TwoFirstOrderODEs/Bipolytrope51New.xlsx --- worksheet = SequenceMuRatio100
Figure 3:  Equilibrium Sequences
of Pressure-Truncated Polytropes

Equilibrium sequences of Pressure-Truncated Polytropes

Example data values drawn from worksheet "SequenceMuRatio100" …

Δξ=(9.01499598−0.05)/99=0.0905551

ngrid ξi=0.05+(ngrid−1)⋅Δξ θi A ηs Mtot log⁡10ρ0 R
1 0.05 0.9995836 1.00124818 3.141592582 2.510 0.0009044 1.253
2 0.140555 0.9967235 1.0097655 3.141580334 2.531 0.0071264 1.253
19 1.6799927 0.7178117 1.566601145 2.775921455 3.470 0.719947375 1.107

Fixed Total Mass

Equilibrium Sequence Expressions

Again, drawing from previous Examples in which ρ0 — as well as Kc and G — is held fixed, equilibrium models obey the relations,

Mtot

=

Mtot*[Kc3/2G−3/2ρ0−1/5]=[Kc3/2G−3/2ρ0−1/5](μeμc)−2(2π)1/2Aηsθi;

R

=

R*[Kc1/2G−1/2ρ0−2/5]=[Kc1/2G−1/2ρ0−2/5](μeμc)−1ηs2πθi2;

Pi

=

Pi*[Kcρ06/5]=[Kcρ06/5]θi6.

Let's invert the first expression in order to construct equilibrium sequences in which the total mass — rather than ρ0 — is held fixed. We find that,

ρ01/5

=

[Kc3/2G−3/2Mtot−1](μeμc)−2(2π)1/2Aηsθi

⇒R

=

[Kc1/2G−1/2](μeμc)−1ηs2πθi2{[Kc3/2G−3/2Mtot−1](μeμc)−2(2π)1/2Aηsθi}−2

 

=

[Kc1/2G−1/2](μeμc)−1ηs2πθi2[Kc3/2G−3/2Mtot−1]−2(μeμc)4(π2)θi2A2ηs2

 

=

[Kc−5/2G5/2Mtot2](μeμc)3(π23)1/21A2ηs.

And,

Pi

=

Kcθi6{[Kc3/2G−3/2Mtot−1](μeμc)−2(2π)1/2Aηsθi}6

 

=

Kc{[Kc3/2G−3/2Mtot−1]6(μeμc)−12(2π)3A6ηs6}

 

=

[Kc10G−9Mtot−6](μeμc)−12(2π)3A6ηs6.

Note as well that,

Pi(4π3R3)

=

4π3[Kc10G−9Mtot−6](μeμc)−12(2π)3A6ηs6{[Kc−5/2G5/2Mtot2](μeμc)3(π23)1/21A2ηs}3

 

=

4π3(2π)3(π23)3/2[Kc10G−9Mtot−6](μeμc)−12ηs3{[Kc−15/2G15/2Mtot6](μeμc)9}

 

=

4π3(2π)3(π23)3/2[Kc5/2G−3/2](μeμc)−3ηs3

Sequence Plots

A plot of Pi[Kc−10G9Mtot6] versus R3[Kc5/2G−5/2Mtot−2]3 at fixed interface pressure will be generated via the relations,

Ordinate   Abscissa

(μeμc)−12(2π)3A6ηs6

vs

{(μeμc)3(π23)1/21A2ηs}3

Hidden Text

Following the Lead of Yabushita75

Here in the context of (nc,ne)=(5,1) bipolytropes, we want to construct an interface-pressure versus volume plot; and mass-versus-central density plots like the ones displayed for truncated isothermal spheres in Figure 1 of an accompanying discussion, and as displayed for a (nc,ne)=(∞,3/2) bipolytrope in Figure 1 (p. 445) of 📚 S. Yabushita (1975, MNRAS, Vol. 172, pp. 441 - 453).

In our accompanying chapter that presents example models of (nc,ne)=(5,1) bipolytropes, we have adopted the following normalizations:

ρ*

≡

ρρ0

;    

r*

≡

r[Kc1/2/(G1/2ρ02/5)]

P*

≡

PKcρ06/5

;    

Mr*

≡

Mr[Kc3/2/(G3/2ρ01/5)]

Also, from the relevant interface conditions, we find,

(KeKc)

=

ρ0−4/5(μeμc)−2θi−4.

Inverting this last expression gives,

ρ04/5

=

(μeμc)−2θi−4(KeKc)−1

⇒ρ01/5

=

(μeμc)−1/2θi−1(KeKc)−1/4.

Hence, we can rewrite the "normalized" expressions as follows:

r

=

r*[Kc1/2G−1/2ρ0−2/5]

 

=

r*{Kc1/2G−1/2[(μeμc)−1/2θi−1(KeKc)−1/4]−2}

 

=

r*{Kc1/2G−1/2[(μeμc)θi2(KeKc)1/2]}

 

=

r*[Ke1/2G−1/2](μeμc)θi2.


Fixed Interface Pressure

Start with the model relation,

Pi

=

[Kcρ06/5]Pi*

 

=

[Kcρ06/5](1+13ξi2)−3

Now, given that,

ρ01/5

=

(μeμc)−1/2θi−1(KeKc)−1/4.

⇒ρ06/5

=

(μeμc)−3θi−6(KeKc)−3/2.

Fixed Total Mass

Also, from the relevant interface conditions, we find,

(KeKc)

=

ρ0−4/5(μeμc)−2θi−4.

Inverting this last expression gives,

ρ04/5

=

(μeμc)−2θi−4(KeKc)−1

⇒ρ01/5

=

(μeμc)−1/2θi−1(KeKc)−1/4.

Hence, for a given specification of the interface location, ξi — test values shown (in parentheses) assuming μe/μc=1.0 and ξi=0.5 — the desired expression for the central density is,

ρ0

=

[Ke−5Kc5]1/4(μeμc)−5/2θi−5;

and, drawing the expression for the normalized total mass from our accompanying table of parameter values, namely,

Mtot*

=

(μeμc)−2(2π)1/2Aηsθi

we find,

Mr

=

Mr*[Kc3/2G−3/2ρ0−1/5]

 

=

Mr*[Kc3/2G−3/2]{(μeμc)−1/2θi−1(KeKc)−1/4}−1

 

=

Mr*[Kc3/2G−3/2(KeKc)1/4](μeμc)1/2θi

⇒Mtot

=

[Kc3/2G−3/2(KeKc)1/4](μeμc)1/2θi(μeμc)−2(2π)1/2Aηsθi

 

=

[KeKc−5G−6]1/4(μeμc)−3/2(2π)1/2Aηs,

where — again, from our accompanying table of parameter values —

θi

=

(1+13ξi2)−1/2;

      (0.96077)

ηi

=

(μeμc)3θi2ξi;

      (0.79941)

Λi

=

1ηi−ξi3;

      (0.96225)

A

=

ηi(1+Λi2)1/2;

      (1.10940)

ηs

=

ηi+π2+tan−1(Λi);

      (3.13637)

Mtot[KeKc−5G−6]1/4

=

(μeμc)−3/2(2π)1/2Aηs;

      (2.77623)

ρ0[Ke−5Kc5]1/4

=

(μeμc)−5/2θi−5.

      (1.22153)

Building on Earlier Eigenfunction Details

In the heading of Figure 6 from our accompanying presentation of the properties of marginally unstable oscillation modes in (nc,ne)=(5,1) bipolytropes, we point to the (Excel spreadsheet) "Data File" that contains most of the relevant model details. See specifically,

file = Dropbox/WorkFolder/Wiki edits/BiPolytrope/LinearPerturbation/FaulknerBipolytrope1.xlsx --- worksheet = Mode0Ensemble
file = Dropbox/WorkFolder/Wiki edits/BiPolytrope/LinearPerturbation/FaulknerBipolytrope1.xlsx --- worksheet = Mode0Ensemble
Figure 6: Eigenfunctions Associated with the Fundamental-Mode of Radial Oscillation

in Marginally Unstable Models having Various μe/μc

Related Discussions

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |