SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/RedGiantToPN: Difference between revisions
| Line 1,008: | Line 1,008: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
====Sequence Plots==== | |||
A plot of <math>M_\mathrm{tot}\biggl[K_c^{5}K_e G^{-6}\biggr]^{-1 / 4}</math> versus <math>R\biggl[K_e G^{-1} \biggr]^{-1/2}</math> at fixed interface pressure will be generated via the relations, | |||
<table align="center" cellpadding="8"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="center">Ordinate</td> | |||
<td align="center"> </td> | |||
<td align="center">Abscissa</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>\biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3/2} | |||
\biggl(\frac{2}{\pi}\biggr)^{1 / 2} A\eta_s | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
'''vs''' | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>\frac{\eta_s}{\sqrt{2\pi}}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
====Hidden Text==== | |||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
In order to build a sequence along which <math>M_\mathrm{tot}</math> is held fixed, we must set | In order to build a sequence along which <math>M_\mathrm{tot}</math> is held fixed, we must set | ||
Revision as of 15:11, 13 November 2025
Main Sequence to Red Giant to Planetary Nebula
Preface
|
In terms of mass , length , and time , the units of various physical constants and variables are:
As a result, for example (see details below), if we hold the central-density — as well as and — constant along an equilibrium sequence, mass will scale as …
If instead (see details below) we hold — as well as and — constant along an equilibrium sequence, mass will scale as …
|
Original Model Construction
Fixed Central Density
From Examples, we find,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where, rewriting the relevant expressions in terms of the parameters,
and
we find,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Interface Pressure
Equilibrium Sequence Expressions
From the relevant interface conditions, we find,
|
|
|
|
Inverting this last expression gives,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence, keeping and constant, we have,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This last expression shows that if and are both held fixed, then the interface pressure, , will be constant along the sequence of equilibrium models.
Note also:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sequence Plots
A plot of versus at fixed interface pressure will be generated via the relations,
| Ordinate | Abscissa | |
|
|
vs |
|
Alternatively, a plot of versus at fixed interface pressure will be generated via the relations,
| Ordinate | Abscissa | |
|
|
vs |
|
Fixed Total Mass
Equilibrium Sequence Expressions
Again, drawing from previous Examples in which — as well as and — is held fixed, equilibrium models obey the relations,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let's invert the first expression in order to construct equilibrium sequences in which the total mass — rather than — is held fixed. We find that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note as well that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sequence Plots
A plot of versus at fixed interface pressure will be generated via the relations,
| Ordinate | Abscissa | |
|
|
vs |
|
Hidden Text
Following the Lead of Yabushita75
Here in the context of bipolytropes, we want to construct an interface-pressure versus volume plot; and mass-versus-central density plots like the ones displayed for truncated isothermal spheres in Figure 1 of an accompanying discussion, and as displayed for a bipolytrope in Figure 1 (p. 445) of 📚 S. Yabushita (1975, MNRAS, Vol. 172, pp. 441 - 453).
In our accompanying chapter that presents example models of bipolytropes, we have adopted the following normalizations:
|
|
|
|
; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; |
|
|
|
Also, from the relevant interface conditions, we find,
|
|
|
|
Inverting this last expression gives,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence, we can rewrite the "normalized" expressions as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Interface Pressure
Start with the model relation,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now, given that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Total Mass
Also, from the relevant interface conditions, we find,
|
|
|
|
Inverting this last expression gives,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence, for a given specification of the interface location, — test values shown (in parentheses) assuming and — the desired expression for the central density is,
|
|
|
|
and, drawing the expression for the normalized total mass from our accompanying table of parameter values, namely,
|
|
|
|
we find,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where — again, from our accompanying table of parameter values —
|
|
|
|
(0.96077) | |
|
|
|
|
(0.79941) | |
|
|
|
|
(0.96225) | |
|
|
|
|
(1.10940) | |
|
|
|
|
(3.13637) | |
|
|
|
|
(2.77623) | |
|
|
|
|
(1.22153) |
Building on Earlier Eigenfunction Details
In the heading of Figure 6 from our accompanying presentation of the properties of marginally unstable oscillation modes in bipolytropes, we point to the (Excel spreadsheet) "Data File" that contains most of the relevant model details. See specifically,
Related Discussions
- Instability Onset Overview
- Analytic
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |
