SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/RedGiantToPN: Difference between revisions

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Line 4: Line 4:
==Following the Lead of Yabushita75==
==Following the Lead of Yabushita75==


Here in the context of <math>(n_c, n_e) = (5, 1)</math> bipolytropes, we want to construct mass-versus-central density plots like the one displayed for truncated isothermal spheres in [[SSC/Stability/InstabilityOnsetOverview#Fig1|Figure 1 of an accompanying discussion]], and as displayed for a <math>(n_c, n_e) = (\infty, 3/2)</math> bipolytrope in Figure 1 (p. 445) of {{ Yabushita75full }}.
Here in the context of <math>(n_c, n_e) = (5, 1)</math> bipolytropes, we want to construct an interface-pressure versus volume plot; and mass-versus-central density plots like the ones displayed for truncated isothermal spheres in [[SSC/Stability/InstabilityOnsetOverview#Fig1|Figure 1 of an accompanying discussion]], and as displayed for a <math>(n_c, n_e) = (\infty, 3/2)</math> bipolytrope in Figure 1 (p. 445) of {{ Yabushita75full }}.


In our [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51/Pt2#BiPolytrope_with_nc_=_5_and_ne_=_1_(Pt_2)|accompanying chapter]] that presents example models of <math>(n_c, n_e) = (5, 1)</math> bipolytropes, we have adopted the following [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51/Pt2#Normalization|normalizations]]:
In our [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51/Pt2#BiPolytrope_with_nc_=_5_and_ne_=_1_(Pt_2)|accompanying chapter]] that presents example models of <math>(n_c, n_e) = (5, 1)</math> bipolytropes, we have adopted the following [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51/Pt2#Normalization|normalizations]]:
Line 58: Line 58:
</table>
</table>
</div>
</div>
Also, from the relevant [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51#Step_5:_Interface_Conditions|interface conditions]], we find,
<table border="0" cellpadding="3" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\biggl( \frac{K_e}{K_c} \biggr) </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\rho_0^{-4/5}\biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-2} \theta^{-4}_i \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
Inverting this last expression gives,
<table border="0" cellpadding="3" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\rho_0^{4/5}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-2} \theta^{-4}_i \biggl( \frac{K_e}{K_c} \biggr)^{-1} </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \rho_0^{1/5}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-1 / 2} \theta^{-1}_i \biggl( \frac{K_e}{K_c} \biggr)^{-1 / 4} \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
Hence, we can rewrite the "normalized" expressions as follows:
<table align="center" border="0" cellpadding="3">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\rho</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2\biggr)^{-5/2} \rho_0</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
===Fixed Interface Pressure===
Start with the model relation,
<table border="0" cellpadding="3" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>P_i</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\biggl[K_c \rho_0^{6/5}\biggr] P_i^*</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\biggl[K_c \rho_0^{6/5}\biggr] \biggl(1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi_i^2 \biggr)^{-3}</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
Now, given that,
<table border="0" cellpadding="3" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\rho_0^{1/5}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-1 / 2} \theta^{-1}_i \biggl( \frac{K_e}{K_c} \biggr)^{-1 / 4} \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \rho_0^{6/5}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-3} \theta^{-6}_i \biggl( \frac{K_e}{K_c} \biggr)^{-3 / 2} \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
===Fixed Total Mass===


Also, from the relevant [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51#Step_5:_Interface_Conditions|interface conditions]], we find,
Also, from the relevant [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic51#Step_5:_Interface_Conditions|interface conditions]], we find,

Revision as of 19:06, 18 October 2025

Main Sequence to Red Giant to Planetary Nebula

Following the Lead of Yabushita75

Here in the context of (nc,ne)=(5,1) bipolytropes, we want to construct an interface-pressure versus volume plot; and mass-versus-central density plots like the ones displayed for truncated isothermal spheres in Figure 1 of an accompanying discussion, and as displayed for a (nc,ne)=(,3/2) bipolytrope in Figure 1 (p. 445) of 📚 S. Yabushita (1975, MNRAS, Vol. 172, pp. 441 - 453).

In our accompanying chapter that presents example models of (nc,ne)=(5,1) bipolytropes, we have adopted the following normalizations:

ρ*

ρρ0

;    

r*

r[Kc1/2/(G1/2ρ02/5)]

P*

PKcρ06/5

;    

Mr*

Mr[Kc3/2/(G3/2ρ01/5)]

Also, from the relevant interface conditions, we find,

(KeKc)

=

ρ04/5(μeμc)2θi4.

Inverting this last expression gives,

ρ04/5

=

(μeμc)2θi4(KeKc)1

ρ01/5

=

(μeμc)1/2θi1(KeKc)1/4.

Hence, we can rewrite the "normalized" expressions as follows:

ρ

(1+13ξ2)5/2ρ0


Fixed Interface Pressure

Start with the model relation,

Pi

=

[Kcρ06/5]Pi*

 

=

[Kcρ06/5](1+13ξi2)3

Now, given that,

ρ01/5

=

(μeμc)1/2θi1(KeKc)1/4.

ρ06/5

=

(μeμc)3θi6(KeKc)3/2.


Fixed Total Mass

Also, from the relevant interface conditions, we find,

(KeKc)

=

ρ04/5(μeμc)2θi4.

Inverting this last expression gives,

ρ04/5

=

(μeμc)2θi4(KeKc)1

ρ01/5

=

(μeμc)1/2θi1(KeKc)1/4.

Hence, for a given specification of the interface location, ξi — test values shown (in parentheses) assuming μe/μc=1.0 and ξi=0.5 — the desired expression for the central density is,

ρ0

=

[Ke5Kc5]1/4(μeμc)5/2θi5;

and, drawing the expression for the normalized total mass from our accompanying table of parameter values, namely,

Mtot*

=

(μeμc)2(2π)1/2Aηsθi

we find,

Mr

=

Mr*[Kc3/2G3/2ρ01/5]

 

=

Mr*[Kc3/2G3/2]{(μeμc)1/2θi1(KeKc)1/4}1

 

=

Mr*[Kc3/2G3/2(KeKc)1/4](μeμc)1/2θi

Mtot

=

[Kc3/2G3/2(KeKc)1/4](μeμc)1/2θi(μeμc)2(2π)1/2Aηsθi

 

=

[KeKc5G6]1/4(μeμc)3/2(2π)1/2Aηs,

where — again, from our accompanying table of parameter values

θi

=

(1+13ξi2)1/2;

      (0.96077)

ηi

=

(μeμc)3θi2ξi;

      (0.79941)

Λi

=

1ηiξi3;

      (0.96225)

A

=

ηi(1+Λi2)1/2;

      (1.10940)

ηs

=

ηi+π2+tan1(Λi);

      (3.13637)

Mtot[KeKc5G6]1/4

=

(μeμc)3/2(2π)1/2Aηs;

      (2.77623)

ρ0[Ke5Kc5]1/4

=

(μeμc)5/2θi5.

      (1.22153)

Building on Earlier Eigenfunction Details

In the heading of Figure 6 from our accompanying presentation of the properties of marginally unstable oscillation modes in (nc,ne)=(5,1) bipolytropes, we point to the (Excel spreadsheet) "Data File" that contains most of the relevant model details. See specifically,

file = Dropbox/WorkFolder/Wiki edits/BiPolytrope/LinearPerturbation/FaulknerBipolytrope1.xlsx --- worksheet = Mode0Ensemble
file = Dropbox/WorkFolder/Wiki edits/BiPolytrope/LinearPerturbation/FaulknerBipolytrope1.xlsx --- worksheet = Mode0Ensemble
Figure 6: Eigenfunctions Associated with the Fundamental-Mode of Radial Oscillation

in Marginally Unstable Models having Various μe/μc

Related Discussions

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |