ParabolicDensity/Axisymmetric/Structure: Difference between revisions
| Line 428: | Line 428: | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\biggl[ (A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - A_s ) - (A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^4 - A_s \chi^2)\biggr]\zeta^2 | \overbrace{\biggl[ (A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - A_s ) - (A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^4 - A_s \chi^2)\biggr]}^\mathrm{coef1}\zeta^2 | ||
+ \frac{1}{2}\biggl[ A_{ss} a_\ell^2 - A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - (1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - A_s )\biggr]\zeta^4 | + \underbrace{\frac{1}{2}\biggl[ A_{ss} a_\ell^2 - A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - (1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - A_s )\biggr]}_\mathrm{coef2}\zeta^4 | ||
+ \frac{1}{3}\biggl[ - (1-e^2)^{-1}A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \biggr] \zeta^6 + ~\mathrm{const} | + \overbrace{\frac{1}{3}\biggl[ - (1-e^2)^{-1}A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \biggr]}^\mathrm{coef3} \zeta^6 + ~\mathrm{const} | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Revision as of 12:13, 13 November 2024
Parabolic Density Distribution
Part I: Gravitational Potential
|
Part II: Spherical Structures
|
Part III: Axisymmetric Equilibrium Structures |
Part IV: Triaxial Equilibrium Structures (Exploration)
|
Axisymmetric (Oblate) Equilibrium Structures
Tentative Summary
Known Relations
| Density: |
|
|
|
| Gravitational Potential: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and, |
|
|
where, and , and the relevant index symbol expressions are:
|
|
[1.7160030] | ||
|
|
|
|
[0.6055597] |
|
|
[0.7888807] | ||
|
|
|
|
[0.3726937] |
|
|
|
|
[0.7021833] |
|
|
|
|
[0.5092250] |
where the eccentricity,
NOTE: The posted numerical evaluations (inside square brackets) assume that the configuration's eccentricity is .
Drawing from our separate "6th Try" discussion — and as has been highlighted here for example — for the axisymmetric configurations under consideration, the and components of the Euler equation become, respectively,
|
Multiplying the component through by length and dividing through by the square of the velocity , we have,
|
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
Multiplying the component through by length and dividing through by the square of the velocity , we have,
| : |
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
Play With Vertical Pressure Gradient
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Integrate over gives …
|
|
||
|
|
If I am interpreting this correctly, should tell how the normalized pressure varies with , for a fixed choice of . Again, for a fixed choice of , we want to specify the value of the "const." — hereafter, — such that at the surface of the configuration; but at the surface where , it must also be true that,
| at the surface … |
|
Hence (numerical evaluations assume χ = 0.6 as well as e = 0.6),
|
|
|
Central Pressure
At the center of the configuration — where — we see that,
Hence, the central pressure is,
|

Note for later use that,
|
… |
Now Play With Radial Pressure Gradient
After multiplying through by , the last term on the RHS of the component is given by the expression,
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
If we replace the normalized pressure by , the first term on the RHS of the component becomes,
|
|
||
|
|
Hence,
|
|
= |
|
10th Try
Repeating Key Relations
| Density: |
|
|
|
| Gravitational Potential: |
|
|
|
| Vertical Pressure Gradient: |
|
From the above (9th Try) examination of the vertical pressure gradient, we determined that a reasonably good approximation for the normalized pressure throughout the configuration is given by the expression,
|
|
If we set — that is, if we look along the vertical axis — this approximation should be particularly good, resulting in the expression,
|
|
|
Note that in the limit that — that is, at the pole along the vertical (symmetry) axis where the should drop to zero — we should set . This allows us to determine the central pressure.
|
This means that, along the vertical axis, the pressure gradient is,
|
|
|
|
This should match the more general "vertical pressure gradient" expression when we set, , that is,
|
|
||
|
|
Yes! The expressions match!
See Also
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |