ParabolicDensity/Axisymmetric/Structure: Difference between revisions

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Line 428: Line 428:
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
\biggl[ (A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - A_s ) - (A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^4 - A_s \chi^2)\biggr]\zeta^2   
\overbrace{\biggl[ (A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - A_s ) - (A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^4 - A_s \chi^2)\biggr]}^\mathrm{coef1}\zeta^2   
+  \frac{1}{2}\biggl[ A_{ss} a_\ell^2  -  A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - (1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - A_s )\biggr]\zeta^4  
\underbrace{\frac{1}{2}\biggl[ A_{ss} a_\ell^2  -  A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - (1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - A_s )\biggr]}_\mathrm{coef2}\zeta^4  
+ \frac{1}{3}\biggl[ - (1-e^2)^{-1}A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \biggr] \zeta^6 + ~\mathrm{const}
+ \overbrace{\frac{1}{3}\biggl[ - (1-e^2)^{-1}A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \biggr]}^\mathrm{coef3} \zeta^6 + ~\mathrm{const}
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>

Revision as of 12:13, 13 November 2024

Parabolic Density Distribution


Part I:   Gravitational Potential

 


Part II:   Spherical Structures

 


Part III:   Axisymmetric Equilibrium Structures

 Old: 1st thru 7th tries
 Old: 8th thru 10th tries


Part IV:   Triaxial Equilibrium Structures (Exploration)

 

Axisymmetric (Oblate) Equilibrium Structures

Tentative Summary

Known Relations

Density:

ρ(ϖ,z)ρc

=

[1χ2ζ2(1e2)1],

Gravitational Potential:

Φgrav(ϖ,z)(πGρca2)

=

12IBTAχ2Asζ2+12[(Assa2)ζ4+2(Asa2)χ2ζ2+(Aa2)χ4].

 

ζ[Φgrav(πGρca2)]

=

2(Asa2)χ2ζ2Asζ+2(Assa2)ζ3.

 

and,     χ[Φgrav(πGρca2)]

=

2(Asa2)χζ22Aχ+2(Aa2)χ3.

where, χϖ/a and ζz/a, and the relevant index symbol expressions are:

IBT =

2A+As(1e2)=2(1e2)1/2[sin1ee];

[1.7160030]

A

=

1e2[sin1ee(1e2)1/2](1e2)1/2;

[0.6055597]
As =

2e2[(1e2)1/2sin1ee](1e2)1/2;

[0.7888807]

a2A

=

14e4{(3+2e2)(1e2)+3(1e2)1/2[sin1ee]}=[12(AsA)4e2];       

[0.3726937]

a2Ass

=

23{(4e23)e4(1e2)+3(1e2)1/2e4[sin1ee]}=23[(1e2)1(AsA)e2];       

[0.7021833]

a2As

=

1e4{(3e2)3(1e2)1/2[sin1ee]}=(AsA)e2,

[0.5092250]

where the eccentricity,

e[1(asa)2]1/2.

NOTE:   The posted numerical evaluations (inside square brackets) assume that the configuration's eccentricity is e=0.6as/a=0.8.

Drawing from our separate "6th Try" discussion — and as has been highlighted here for example — for the axisymmetric configurations under consideration, the e^z and e^ϖ components of the Euler equation become, respectively,

e^z:    

0

=

[1ρPz+Φz]

e^ϖ:    

j2ϖ3

=

[1ρPϖ+Φϖ]

Multiplying the e^z component through by length (a) and dividing through by the square of the velocity (πGρca2), we have,

0

=

[1ρPz+Φz]a(πGρca2)

 

=

ρcρζ[P(πGρc2a2)]ζ[Φ(πGρca2)]

ζ[P(πGρc2a2)]

=

ρρcζ[Φ(πGρca2)]

 

=

ρρc[2(Asa2)χ2ζ2Asζ+2(Assa2)ζ3]

Multiplying the e^ϖ component through by length (a) and dividing through by the square of the velocity (πGρca2), we have,

e^ϖ:    

j2ϖ3a(πGρca2)

=

[1ρPϖ+Φgravϖ]a(πGρca2)

 

1χ3j2(πGρca4)

=

ρcρχ[P(πGρc2a2)]χ[Φgrav(πGρca2)]

Play With Vertical Pressure Gradient

[1(πGρc2a2)]Pζ =

[1χ2ζ2(1e2)1][2Asa2χ2ζ2Asζ+2Assa2ζ3]

  =

[(2Asa2χ22As)ζ+2Assa2ζ3]χ2[(2Asa2χ22As)ζ+2Assa2ζ3]ζ2(1e2)1[(2Asa2χ22As)ζ+2Assa2ζ3]

  =

(2Asa2χ22As)ζ+2Assa2ζ3(2Asa2χ42Asχ2)ζ2Assa2χ2ζ3(1e2)1[(2Asa2χ22As)ζ3+2Assa2ζ5]

  =

[(2Asa2χ22As)(2Asa2χ42Asχ2)]ζ+[2Assa22Assa2χ2(1e2)1(2Asa2χ22As)]ζ3+[(1e2)12Assa2]ζ5.

Integrate over ζ gives …

Pdeduced*[1(πGρc2a2)][Pζ]dζ =

[(Asa2χ2As)(Asa2χ4Asχ2)]coef1ζ2+12[Assa2Assa2χ2(1e2)1(Asa2χ2As)]coef2ζ4+13[(1e2)1Assa2]coef3ζ6+const

  =

[Asζ2+12Assa2ζ4+12(1e2)1Asζ413(1e2)1Assa2ζ6]χ0+[Asa2ζ2+Asζ212Assa2ζ412(1e2)1(Asa2ζ4)]χ2+[Asa2ζ2]χ4+const.

If I am interpreting this correctly, Pdeduced* should tell how the normalized pressure varies with ζ, for a fixed choice of 0χ1. Again, for a fixed choice of χ, we want to specify the value of the "const." — hereafter, Cχ — such that Pdeduced*=0 at the surface of the configuration; but at the surface where ρ/ρc=0, it must also be true that,

at the surface   …   ζ2 =

(1e2)[1χ2ρρc0]=(1e2)(1χ2).

Hence (numerical evaluations assume χ = 0.6 as well as e = 0.6),

Cχ =

[(Asa2χ2As)(Asa2χ4Asχ2)]coef1=0.38756[(1e2)(1χ2)]+12[Assa2Assa2χ2(1e2)1(Asa2χ2As)]coef2=0.69779[(1e2)(1χ2)]2+13[(1e2)1Assa2]coef3=0.36572[(1e2)(1χ2)]3=0.66807.

Central Pressure

At the center of the configuration — where ζ=χ=0 — we see that,

Cχ|χ=0 =

[(As)](1e2)+12[Assa2+(1e2)1As](1e2)2+13[(1e2)1Assa2](1e2)3

  =

As(1e2)+12[Assa2(1e2)2+(1e2)As]13[(1e2)2Assa2]

  =

12[As(1e2)]+16[Assa2(1e2)2]

Hence, the central pressure is,

Pc*[Pdeduced*]central=Cχ|χ=0 =

12[As(1e2)]16[Assa2(1e2)2].


Ferrers Vertical Pressure
Ferrers Vertical Pressure

Note for later use that,

Cχχ =

Now Play With Radial Pressure Gradient

After multiplying through by ρ/ρc, the last term on the RHS of the e^ϖ component is given by the expression,

ρρc[1(πGρca2)]Φgravχ =

2[1χ2ζ2(1e2)1][(Asa2ζ2A)χ+Aa2χ3]

  =

2[(Asa2ζ2A)χ+Aa2χ3]2χ2[(Asa2ζ2A)χ+Aa2χ3]2ζ2(1e2)1[(Asa2ζ2A)χ+Aa2χ3]

  =

2(Asa2ζ2A)χ+2[Aa2+(AAsa2ζ2)]χ32Aa2χ5+2(1e2)1[(Aζ2Asa2ζ4)χAa2ζ2χ3]

  =

2[(Asa2ζ2A)+(1e2)1(Aζ2Asa2ζ4)]χ+2[Aa2+(AAsa2ζ2)(1e2)1Aa2ζ2]χ32Aa2χ5.

If we replace the normalized pressure by Pdeduced*, the first term on the RHS of the e^ϖ component becomes,

Pdeduced*χ =

χ{[Asζ2+12Assa2ζ4+12(1e2)1Asζ413(1e2)1Assa2ζ6]χ0+[Asa2ζ2+Asζ212Assa2ζ412(1e2)1(Asa2ζ4)]χ2+[Asa2ζ2]χ4+Pc*}

  =

2[Asa2ζ2+Asζ212Assa2ζ412(1e2)1(Asa2ζ4)]χ+4[Asa2ζ2]χ3

Hence,

1χ3j2(πGρca4)ρρc

=

[Pdeduced*χ]ρρcχ[Φgrav(πGρca2)]

10th Try

Repeating Key Relations

Density:

ρ(ϖ,z)ρc

=

[1χ2ζ2(1e2)1],

Gravitational Potential:

Φgrav(ϖ,z)(πGρca2)

=

12IBTAχ2Asζ2+12[(Assa2)ζ4+2(Asa2)χ2ζ2+(Aa2)χ4].

Vertical Pressure Gradient: [1(πGρc2a2)]Pζ =

ρρc[2Asa2χ2ζ2Asζ+2Assa2ζ3]

From the above (9th Try) examination of the vertical pressure gradient, we determined that a reasonably good approximation for the normalized pressure throughout the configuration is given by the expression,

[1(πGρc2a2)][Pζ]dζ =

[Asζ2+12Assa2ζ4+12(1e2)1Asζ413(1e2)1Assa2ζ6]χ0+[Asa2ζ2+Asζ212Assa2ζ412(1e2)1(Asa2ζ4)]χ2+[Asa2ζ2]χ4+const.

If we set χ=0 — that is, if we look along the vertical axis — this approximation should be particularly good, resulting in the expression,

Pz{[1(πGρc2a2)][Pζ]dζ}χ=0 =

Pc*Asζ2+12Assa2ζ4+12(1e2)1Asζ413(1e2)1Assa2ζ6.

Note that in the limit that zas — that is, at the pole along the vertical (symmetry) axis where the Pz should drop to zero — we should set ζ(1e2)1/2. This allows us to determine the central pressure.

Pc* =

As(1e2)12Assa2(1e2)212(1e2)1As(1e2)2+13(1e2)1Assa2(1e2)3

  =

As(1e2)12As(1e2)+13Assa2(1e2)212Assa2(1e2)2

  =

12As(1e2)16Assa2(1e2)2.

This means that, along the vertical axis, the pressure gradient is,

Pz{[1(πGρc2a2)][Pζ]dζ}χ=0 =

Pc*Asζ2+12Assa2ζ4+12(1e2)1Asζ413(1e2)1Assa2ζ6.

Pzζ =

2Asζ+2Assa2ζ3+2(1e2)1Asζ32(1e2)1Assa2ζ5.

This should match the more general "vertical pressure gradient" expression when we set, χ=0, that is,

{[1(πGρc2a2)]Pζ}χ=0 =

[1χ20ζ2(1e2)1][2Asa2ζχ202Asζ+2Assa2ζ3]

  =

[2Asζ+2Assa2ζ3]+ζ2(1e2)1[2Asζ2Assa2ζ3]

Yes! The expressions match!

See Also

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |