Parabolic Density Distribution [ edit ]
Axisymmetric (Oblate) Equilibrium Structures [ edit ]
Gravitational Potential [ edit ]
As we have detailed in an accompanying discussion , for an oblate-spheroidal configuration — that is, when a s < a m = a ℓ — the gravitational potential may be obtained from the expression,
Φ g r a v ( 𝐱 ) ( − π G ρ c )
=
1 2 I B T a 1 2 − ( A 1 x 2 + A 2 y 2 + A 3 z 2 ) + ( A 1 2 x 2 y 2 + A 1 3 x 2 z 2 + A 2 3 y 2 z 2 ) + 1 6 ( 3 A 1 1 x 4 + 3 A 2 2 y 4 + 3 A 3 3 z 4 ) ,
where, in the present context, we can rewrite this expression as,
Φ g r a v ( 𝐱 ) ( − π G ρ c )
=
1 2 I B T a ℓ 2 − [ A ℓ ( x 2 + y 2 ) + A s z 2 ] + [ A ℓ ℓ x 2 y 2 + A ℓ s x 2 z 2 + A ℓ s y 2 z 2 ] + 1 6 [ 3 A ℓ ℓ x 4 + 3 A ℓ ℓ y 4 + 3 A s s z 4 ]
=
1 2 I B T a ℓ 2 − [ A ℓ ϖ 2 + A s z 2 ] + [ A ℓ ℓ x 2 y 2 + A ℓ s ϖ 2 z 2 ] + 1 2 [ A ℓ ℓ ( x 4 + y 4 ) + A s s z 4 ]
=
1 2 I B T a ℓ 2 − [ A ℓ ϖ 2 + A s z 2 ] + A ℓ ℓ 2 [ ( x 2 + y 2 ) 2 ] + 1 2 [ A s s z 4 ] + [ A ℓ s ϖ 2 z 2 ]
=
1 2 I B T a ℓ 2 − [ A ℓ ϖ 2 + A s z 2 ] + A ℓ ℓ 2 [ ϖ 4 ] + 1 2 [ A s s z 4 ] + [ A ℓ s ϖ 2 z 2 ]
⇒ Φ g r a v ( 𝐱 ) ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 I B T − [ A ℓ ( ϖ 2 a ℓ 2 ) + A s ( z 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] + 1 2 [ A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ( ϖ 4 a ℓ 4 ) + A s s a ℓ 2 ( z 4 a ℓ 4 ) + 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ( ϖ 2 z 2 a ℓ 4 ) ] .
Index Symbol Expressions [ edit ]
The expression for the zeroth-order normalization term ( I B T ) , and the relevant pair of 1st -order index symbol expressions are:
I B T
=
2 A ℓ + A s ( 1 − e 2 ) = 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 [ sin − 1 e e ] ;
A ℓ
=
1 e 2 [ sin − 1 e e − ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 ;
A s
=
2 e 2 [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 / 2 − sin − 1 e e ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 ,
[EFE ], Chapter 3, Eq. (36)
[T78 ], §4.5, Eqs. (48) & (49)
where the eccentricity,
The relevant 2nd -order index symbol expressions are:
a ℓ 2 A ℓ ℓ
=
1 4 e 4 { − ( 3 + 2 e 2 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) + 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 [ sin − 1 e e ] } ;
3 2 a ℓ 2 A s s
=
( 4 e 2 − 3 ) e 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) + 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 e 4 [ sin − 1 e e ] ;
a ℓ 2 A ℓ s
=
1 e 4 { ( 3 − e 2 ) − 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 [ sin − 1 e e ] } .
We can crosscheck this last expression by drawing on a shortcut expression ,
A ℓ s
=
− A ℓ − A s ( a ℓ 2 − a s 2 )
⇒ a ℓ 2 A ℓ s
=
1 e 2 { A s − A ℓ }
=
1 e 2 { 2 e 2 [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 / 2 − sin − 1 e e ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 − 1 e 2 [ sin − 1 e e − ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 }
=
1 e 4 { [ 2 − 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 sin − 1 e e ] − [ ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 sin − 1 e e − ( 1 − e 2 ) ] }
=
1 e 4 { ( 3 − e 2 ) − 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 sin − 1 e e } .
Meridional Plane Equi-Potential Contours [ edit ]
Here, we follow closely our separate discussion of equipotential surfaces for Maclaurin Spheroids, assuming no rotation .
Configuration Surface [ edit ]
In the meridional ( ϖ , z ) plane, the surface of this oblate-spheroidal configuration — identified by the thick, solid-black curve below, in Figure 1 — is defined by the expression,
ρ ρ c
=
1 − [ ϖ 2 a ℓ 2 + z 2 a s 2 ] = 0
⇒ ϖ 2 a ℓ 2 + z 2 a s 2
=
1
⇒ z 2
=
a s 2 [ 1 − ϖ 2 a ℓ 2 ] = a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) [ 1 − ϖ 2 a ℓ 2 ]
⇒ z a ℓ
=
± ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 [ 1 − ϖ 2 a ℓ 2 ] 1 / 2 ,
for 0 ≤ | ϖ | a ℓ ≤ 1 .
Expression for Gravitational Potential [ edit ]
Throughout the interior of this configuration, each associated Φ e f f = constant, equipotential surface is defined by the expression,
ϕ c h o i c e ≡ Φ g r a v ( 𝐱 ) ( π G ρ c a ℓ 2 ) + 1 2 I B T
=
[ A ℓ ( ϖ 2 a ℓ 2 ) + A s ( z 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] − 1 2 [ A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ( ϖ 4 a ℓ 4 ) + A s s a ℓ 2 ( z 4 a ℓ 4 ) + 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ( ϖ 2 z 2 a ℓ 4 ) ] .
Letting,
ζ ≡ z 2 a ℓ 2 ,
we can rewrite this expression for ϕ c h o i c e as,
ϕ c h o i c e
=
A ℓ ( ϖ 2 a ℓ 2 ) + A s ζ − 1 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ( ϖ 4 a ℓ 4 ) − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ( ϖ 2 a ℓ 2 ) ζ
=
− 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 + [ A s − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ( ϖ 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ζ + A ℓ ( ϖ 2 a ℓ 2 ) − 1 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ( ϖ 4 a ℓ 4 ) .
Potential at the Pole [ edit ]
At the pole, ( ϖ , z ) = ( 0 , a s ) . Hence,
ϕ c h o i c e | m i d
=
− 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( a s 2 a ℓ 2 ) 2 + [ A s − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ( ϖ 2 a ℓ 2 ) 0 ] ( a s 2 a ℓ 2 ) + A ℓ ( ϖ 2 a ℓ 2 ) 0 − 1 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ( ϖ 4 a ℓ 4 ) 0
=
A s ( a s 2 a ℓ 2 ) − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( a s 2 a ℓ 2 ) 2 .
General Determination of Vertical Coordinate (ζ) [ edit ]
Given values of the three parameters, e , ϖ , and ϕ c h o i c e , this last expression can be viewed as a quadratic equation for ζ . Specifically,
where,
α
≡
1 2 A s s a ℓ 2
=
1 3 { ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) e 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) + 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 e 4 [ sin − 1 e e ] } ,
β
≡
A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ( ϖ 2 a ℓ 2 ) − A s
=
1 e 4 { ( 3 − e 2 ) − 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 sin − 1 e e } ( ϖ 2 a ℓ 2 ) − 2 e 2 [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 / 2 − sin − 1 e e ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 ,
γ
≡
ϕ c h o i c e + 1 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ( ϖ 4 a ℓ 4 ) − A ℓ ( ϖ 2 a ℓ 2 )
=
ϕ c h o i c e + 1 8 e 4 { − ( 3 + 2 e 2 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) + 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 [ sin − 1 e e ] } ( ϖ 4 a ℓ 4 ) − 1 e 2 [ sin − 1 e e − ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 ( ϖ 2 a ℓ 2 ) .
The solution of this quadratic equation gives,
Should we adopt the superior (positive) sign, or is it more physically reasonable to adopt the inferior (negative) sign? As it turns out, β is intrinsically negative, so the quantity, − β , is positive. Furthermore, when γ goes to zero, we need ζ to go to zero as well. This will only happen if we adopt the inferior (negative) sign. Hence, the physically sensible root of this quadratic relation is given by the expression,
Here we present a quantitatively accurate depiction of the shape of the (Ferrers) gravitational potential that arises from oblate-spheroidal configurations having a parabolic density distribution. We closely follow the discussion of equi-gravitational potential contours that arise in (uniform-density) Maclaurin spheroids . In order to facilitate comparison with Maclaurin spheroids, we will focus on a model with …
a s a ℓ = 0 . 5 8 2 7 2 4 ,
e = 0 . 8 1 2 6 7 ,
A ℓ = A m = 0 . 5 1 5 8 9 0 4 2 ,
A s = 0 . 9 6 8 2 1 9 1 6 ,
I B T = 1 . 3 6 0 5 5 6 ,
a ℓ 2 A ℓ ℓ = 0 . 3 2 8 7 7 5 6 ,
a ℓ 2 A s s = 1 . 5 0 6 6 8 4 8 ,
a ℓ 2 A ℓ s = 0 . 6 8 4 8 9 7 5 .
[NOTE: Along the Maclaurin spheroid sequence, this is the eccentricity that marks bifurcation to the Jacobi ellipsoid sequence — see the first model listed in Table IV (p. 103) of [EFE ] and/or see Tables 1 and 2 of our discussion of the Jacobi ellipsoid sequence . It is unlikely that this same eccentricity has a comparably special physical relevance along the sequence of spheroids having parabolic density distributions.]
The largest value of the gravitational potential that will arise inside (actually, on the surface) of the configuration is at ( ϖ , z ) = ( 1 , 0 ) . That is, when,
ϕ c h o i c e | m a x
=
A ℓ − 1 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 = 0 . 3 5 1 5 0 2 6 .
So we will plot various equipotential surfaces having, 0 < ϕ c h o i c e < ϕ c h o i c e | m a x , recognizing that they will each cut through the equatorial plane ( z = 0 ) at the radial coordinate given by,
ϕ c h o i c e
=
− 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 0 + [ A s − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ( ϖ 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ζ 0 + A ℓ ( ϖ 2 a ℓ 2 ) − 1 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ( ϖ 4 a ℓ 4 )
⇒ 0
=
1 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 2 − A ℓ χ + ϕ c h o i c e ,
where,
χ ≡ ϖ 2 a ℓ 2 .
The solution to this quadratic equation gives,
χ e q p l a n e
=
1 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 { A ℓ ± [ A ℓ 2 − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ϕ c h o i c e ] 1 / 2 }
=
A ℓ A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 { 1 − [ 1 − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ϕ c h o i c e A ℓ 2 ] 1 / 2 } .
Note that, again, the physically relevant root is obtained by adopting the inferior (negative) sign, as has been done in this last expression.
Equipotential Contours that Lie Entirely Within Configuration [ edit ]
For all 0 < ϕ c h o i c e ≤ ϕ c h o i c e | m i d , the equipotential contour will reside entirely within the configuration. In this case, for a given ϕ c h o i c e , we can plot points along the contour by picking (equally spaced?) values of χ e q p l a n e ≥ χ ≥ 0 , then solve the above quadratic equation for the corresponding value of ζ .
In our example configuration, this means … (to be finished)
Tentative Summary [ edit ]
Known Relations [ edit ]
Density:
ρ ( ϖ , z ) ρ c
=
[ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] ,
Gravitational Potential:
Φ g r a v ( ϖ , z ) ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 I B T − A ℓ χ 2 − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 [ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) χ 4 ] .
Specific Angular Momentum:
j 2 ( π G ρ c a ℓ 4 ) ⋅ 1 χ 3
=
2 A ℓ χ − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 3 .
Centrifugal Potential:
Ψ ( π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 [ A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 4 − 2 A ℓ χ 2 ] .
Enthalpy:
[ H ( χ , ζ ) − C B ( π G ρ c a ℓ 2 ) ] − 1 2 I B T
=
− A s ζ 2 + ζ 2 2 [ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 3 χ 2 ) + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 χ 2 ] .
Vertical Pressure Gradient:
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ P ∂ ζ
=
ρ ρ c ⋅ [ 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 ζ − 2 A s ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ]
Radial Pressure Gradient:
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ P ∂ χ
=
ρ ρ c ⋅ { 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 χ }
where, χ ≡ ϖ / a ℓ and ζ ≡ z / a ℓ , and the relevant index symbol expressions are:
I B T
=
2 A ℓ + A s ( 1 − e 2 ) = 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 [ sin − 1 e e ] ;
A ℓ
=
1 e 2 [ sin − 1 e e − ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 ;
A s
=
2 e 2 [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 / 2 − sin − 1 e e ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 ;
a ℓ 2 A ℓ ℓ
=
1 4 e 4 { − ( 3 + 2 e 2 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) + 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 [ sin − 1 e e ] } ;
3 2 a ℓ 2 A s s
=
( 4 e 2 − 3 ) e 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) + 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 e 4 [ sin − 1 e e ] ;
a ℓ 2 A ℓ s
=
1 e 4 { ( 3 − e 2 ) − 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 [ sin − 1 e e ] } ,
where the eccentricity,
6th Try [ edit ]
Euler Equation [ edit ]
From, for example, here we can write the,
Eulerian Representation
of the Euler Equation,
∂ v → ∂ t + ( v → ⋅ ∇ ) v → = − 1 ρ ∇ P − ∇ Φ
In steady-state, we should set ∂ v → / ∂ t = 0 . There are various ways of expressing the nonlinear term on the LHS; from here , for example, we find,
( v → ⋅ ∇ ) v → = 1 2 ∇ ( v → ⋅ v → ) − v → × ( ∇ × v → ) = 1 2 ∇ ( v 2 ) + ζ → × v → ,
where,
is commonly referred to as the vorticity .
Axisymmetric Configurations [ edit ]
From, for example, here , we appreciate that, quite generally, for axisymmetric systems when written in cylindrical coordinates,
( v → ⋅ ∇ ) v →
=
e ^ ϖ [ v ϖ ∂ v ϖ ∂ ϖ + v z ∂ v ϖ ∂ z − v φ v φ ϖ ] + e ^ φ [ v ϖ ∂ v φ ∂ ϖ + v z ∂ v φ ∂ z + v φ v ϖ ϖ ] + e ^ z [ v ϖ ∂ v z ∂ ϖ + v z ∂ v z ∂ z ] .
We seek steady-state configurations for which v ϖ = 0 and v z = 0 , in which case this expression simplifies considerably to,
( v → ⋅ ∇ ) v →
=
e ^ ϖ [ − v φ v φ ϖ ]
=
e ^ ϖ [ − j 2 ϖ 3 ] ,
where, in this last expression we have replaced v φ with the specific angular momentum, j ≡ ϖ v φ = ( ϖ 2 φ ˙ ) , which is a conserved quantity in dynamically evolving systems . NOTE: Up to this point in our discussion, j can be a function of both coordinates, that is, j = j ( ϖ , z ) .
As has been highlighted here for example — for the axisymmetric configurations under consideration — the e ^ ϖ and e ^ z components of the Euler equation become, respectively,
e ^ ϖ :
− j 2 ϖ 3
=
− [ 1 ρ ∂ P ∂ ϖ + ∂ Φ ∂ ϖ ]
e ^ z :
0
=
− [ 1 ρ ∂ P ∂ z + ∂ Φ ∂ z ]
7th Try [ edit ]
Introduction [ edit ]
Density:
ρ ( χ , ζ ) ρ c
=
[ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] ,
Gravitational Potential:
Φ g r a v ( χ , ζ ) ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 I B T − A ℓ χ 2 − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 [ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) χ 4 ] .
Specific Angular Momentum:
j 2 ( π G ρ c a ℓ 4 ) ⋅ 1 χ 3
=
2 j 1 χ − 2 j 3 χ 3 .
Centrifugal Potential:
Ψ ( π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 [ j 3 χ 4 − 2 j 1 χ 2 ] .
From above , we recall the following relations:
4 e 4 ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 )
=
− ( 3 + 2 e 2 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) + Υ ;
3 2 e 4 ( A s s a ℓ 2 )
=
( 4 e 2 − 3 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) + Υ ;
e 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 )
=
( 3 − e 2 ) − Υ .
where,
Crosscheck … Given that,
we obtain the pair of relations,
4 e 4 ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 )
=
− ( 3 + 2 e 2 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) + ( 3 − e 2 ) − e 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 )
=
− ( 3 − 3 e 2 + 2 e 2 − 2 e 4 ) + ( 3 − e 2 ) − e 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 )
=
2 e 4 − e 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 )
⇒ ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 − 1 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ;
3 2 e 4 ( A s s a ℓ 2 )
=
( 4 e 2 − 3 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) + ( 3 − e 2 ) − e 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 )
=
( 4 e 2 − 3 ) + ( 3 − e 2 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) − e 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 )
=
e 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) − e 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 )
⇒ ( A s s a ℓ 2 )
=
2 3 [ 1 ( 1 − e 2 ) − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] .
RHS Square Brackets (TERM1) [ edit ]
Let's rewrite the term inside square brackets on the RHS of the expression for the gravitational potential.
[ ] R H S
≡
[ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) χ 4 ]
=
e − 4 { 2 3 [ ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) + Υ ] ζ 4 + 2 [ ( 3 − e 2 ) − Υ ] χ 2 ζ 2 + 1 4 [ − ( 3 + 2 e 2 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) + Υ ] χ 4 }
=
e − 4 { 2 3 [ ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) ] ζ 4 + 2 [ ( 3 − e 2 ) ] χ 2 ζ 2 + 1 4 [ − ( 3 + 2 e 2 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) ] χ 4 + 2 3 [ ζ 4 − 3 ζ 2 χ 2 + 3 8 χ 4 ] Υ }
=
− e − 4 { 2 3 [ ( 3 − 4 e 2 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) ] ζ 4 − 2 [ ( 3 − e 2 ) ] χ 2 ζ 2 + 1 4 [ ( 3 + 2 e 2 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) ] χ 4 }
+ e − 4 { 2 3 [ ( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ) − 1 3 8 χ 4 ] Υ }
=
− e − 4 2 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) { [ ( 3 − 4 e 2 ) ] ζ 4 − 3 [ ( 3 − e 2 ) ] ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + 3 8 [ ( 3 + 2 e 2 ) ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 }
+ e − 4 { 2 3 [ ( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ) − 1 3 8 χ 4 ] Υ }
=
− 2 e − 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) { ζ 4 − 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + 3 8 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 } + 8 e − 2 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) { ζ 4 − 3 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 − 3 1 6 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 }
+ 2 e − 4 3 [ ( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ) − 1 3 8 χ 4 ] Υ
=
− 2 e − 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) { [ ζ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] [ ζ 2 − 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] − 1 3 8 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 ⏟ − 0 . 0 3 8 8 5 5 } + 8 e − 2 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) { [ ζ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] [ ζ 2 + 1 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] + 1 1 6 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 ⏞ − 0 . 0 1 0 1 2 4 }
+ 2 e − 4 3 [ ( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ) − 1 3 8 χ 4 ⏟ − 0 . 0 6 1 6 0 8 ] Υ
=
0 . 2 1 2 1 1 9 0 1 4
(example #1 , below) .
Check #1:
( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ) − 1 3 8 χ 4
=
ζ 4 − 3 χ 2 ζ 2 + 2 χ 4 − 1 3 8 χ 4
=
ζ 4 − 3 χ 2 ζ 2 + 3 8 χ 4 .
Check #2:
( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 + 1 4 χ 2 ) + 1 1 6 χ 4
=
ζ 4 − 3 4 χ 2 ζ 2 − 1 4 χ 4 + 1 1 6 χ 4
=
ζ 4 − 3 4 χ 2 ζ 2 − 3 1 6 χ 4
RHS Quadratic Terms (TERM2) [ edit ]
The quadratic terms on the RHS can be rewritten as,
A ℓ χ 2 + A s ζ 2
=
{ 1 e 2 [ sin − 1 e e − ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 } χ 2 + { 2 e 2 [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 / 2 − sin − 1 e e ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 } ζ 2
=
{ 1 e 2 [ ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 sin − 1 e e − ( 1 − e 2 ) ] } χ 2 + { 2 e 2 [ 1 − ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 sin − 1 e e ] } ζ 2
=
{ 1 3 e 2 [ Υ − 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) ] } χ 2 + { 2 3 e 2 [ 3 − Υ ] } ζ 2
=
( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 [ χ 2 − 2 ζ 2 ] + χ 2
=
( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 ( χ + 2 ζ ) ( χ − 2 ζ ) + χ 2
T E R M 2
=
0 . 4 0 1 1 5 0
(example #1 , below) .
where, again,
Υ
≡
3 ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 [ sin − 1 e e ] = 2 . 0 4 0 8 3 5 .
Gravitational Potential Rewritten [ edit ]
In summary, then,
Φ g r a v ( χ , ζ ) ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 I B T − A ℓ χ 2 − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 [ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) χ 4 ]
=
1 3 Υ − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 ( χ + 2 ζ ) ( χ − 2 ζ ) − χ 2
− e − 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) { [ ζ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] [ ζ 2 − 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] − 1 3 8 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 } + 4 e − 2 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) { [ ζ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] [ ζ 2 + 1 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] + 1 1 6 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 }
+ e − 4 3 [ ( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ) − 1 3 8 χ 4 ] Υ
=
1 3 Υ − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 ( χ + 2 ζ ) ( χ − 2 ζ ) − χ 2 + 4 3 e 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) { [ ζ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] [ ζ 2 + 1 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] + 1 1 6 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 }
− 1 e 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) { [ ζ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] [ ζ 2 − 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] − 1 3 8 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 } + 1 3 e 4 [ ( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ) − 1 3 8 χ 4 ] Υ
=
1 3 Υ − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 ( χ + 2 ζ ) ( χ − 2 ζ ) + 4 3 e 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) { [ ζ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] [ ζ 2 + 1 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] }
− 1 e 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) { [ ζ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] [ ζ 2 − 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] } + Υ 3 e 4 [ ( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ) ]
− χ 2 + 4 3 e 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) { 1 1 6 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 } + 1 e 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) { 1 3 8 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 } − Υ 3 e 4 { 1 3 8 χ 4 }
=
1 3 Υ − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 ( χ + 2 ζ ) ( χ − 2 ζ ) + 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 2 { [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 2 − χ 2 ] [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 2 + 1 4 χ 2 ] }
− ( 1 − e 2 ) e 4 { [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 2 − χ 2 ] [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ] } + Υ 3 e 4 [ ( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ) ]
− χ 2 + { ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 2 e 2 + 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) 8 e 4 − 1 3 Υ 2 4 e 4 } χ 4 .
=
0.767874 (row 1) + 0.5678833 (row 2) - 0.950574 (row 3)
=
0.3851876 .
Example Evaluation [ edit ]
Let's evaluate these expressions, borrowing from the quantitative example specified above . Specifically, we choose,
a s a ℓ = 0 . 5 8 2 7 2 4 ,
e = 0 . 8 1 2 6 7 ,
A ℓ = A m = 0 . 5 1 5 8 9 0 4 2 ,
A s = 0 . 9 6 8 2 1 9 1 6 ,
I B T = 2 3 Υ = 1 . 3 6 0 5 5 6 ,
a ℓ 2 A ℓ ℓ = 0 . 3 2 8 7 7 5 6 ,
a ℓ 2 A s s = 1 . 5 0 6 6 8 4 8 ,
a ℓ 2 A ℓ s = 0 . 6 8 4 8 9 7 5 .
Also, let's set ρ / ρ c = 0 . 1 and χ = χ 1 = 0 . 7 5 ⇒ χ 1 2 = 0 . 5 6 2 5 . This means that,
ζ 1 2
=
( 1 − e 2 ) [ 1 − χ 2 − ρ ( χ , ζ ) ρ c ] = [ 1 − ( 0 . 8 1 2 6 7 ) 2 ) ] [ 1 − 0 . 5 6 2 5 − 0 . 1 ] = 0 . 1 1 4 6 0
⇒ ζ 1
=
0 . 3 3 8 5 3 .
So, let's evaluate the gravitational potential …
Φ g r a v ( χ 1 , ζ 1 ) ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 I B T − [ A ℓ χ 2 + A s ζ 2 ⏞ T E R M 2 ] + 1 2 [ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) χ 4 ⏟ T E R M 1 ] = 0 . 3 8 5 1 8 7 3 7 2
T E R M 1
=
0 . 0 1 9 7 8 8 9 2 1 + 0 . 0 8 8 3 0 3 5 0 9 + 0 . 1 0 4 0 2 6 6 5 5 = 0 . 2 1 2 1 1 9 0 8 5
T E R M 2
=
0 . 2 9 0 1 8 8 3 6 1 + 0 . 1 1 0 9 6 1 8 0 9 = 0 . 4 0 1 1 5 0 1 7 1 .
Replace ζ With Normalized Density [ edit ]
First, let's readjust the last, 3-row expression for the gravitational potential so that ζ 2 can be readily replaced with the normalized density.
Φ g r a v ( χ , ζ ) ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 3 Υ − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 ( χ 2 − 2 ζ 2 ) + 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 2 { [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 2 − χ 2 ] [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 2 + 1 4 χ 2 ] }
− ( 1 − e 2 ) e 4 { [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 2 − χ 2 ] [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ] } + Υ 3 e 4 [ ( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ) ]
− χ 2 + 1 2 4 e 4 { 2 e 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) + 3 9 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 3 Υ } χ 4 .
Now make the substitution,
where,
We have,
Φ g r a v ( χ , ζ ) ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 3 Υ − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 { χ 2 − 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) [ 1 − χ 2 − ρ * ] } + 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 2 { [ 1 − χ 2 − ρ * ] − χ 2 } { [ 1 − χ 2 − ρ * ] + 1 4 χ 2 }
− ( 1 − e 2 ) e 4 { [ 1 − χ 2 − ρ * ] − χ 2 } { [ 1 − χ 2 − ρ * ] − 2 χ 2 } + Υ 3 e 4 { ( 1 − e 2 ) [ 1 − χ 2 − ρ * ] − χ 2 } { ( 1 − e 2 ) [ 1 − χ 2 − ρ * ] − 2 χ 2 }
− χ 2 + 1 2 4 e 4 { 2 e 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) + 3 9 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 3 Υ } χ 4
=
1 3 Υ − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 { − 2 + 2 e 2 + ( 3 − 2 e 2 ) χ 2 + ( 2 − 2 e 2 ) ρ * } + 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 2 { 1 − 2 χ 2 − ρ * } { 1 − 3 4 χ 2 − ρ * }
− ( 1 − e 2 ) e 4 { 1 − 2 χ 2 − ρ * } { 1 − 3 χ 2 − ρ * } + Υ 3 e 4 { ( 1 − e 2 ) − ( 2 − e 2 ) χ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) ρ * } { ( 1 − e 2 ) − ( 3 − e 2 ) χ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) ρ * }
− χ 2 + 1 2 4 e 4 { 3 9 − 3 7 e 2 − 2 e 4 − 1 3 Υ } χ 4
=
1 3 Υ − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 { − 2 + 3 χ 2 + 2 ρ * + 2 e 2 [ 1 − χ 2 − ρ * ] } + 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 2 { 1 − 2 χ 2 − ρ * } { 1 − 3 4 χ 2 − ρ * }
− ( 1 − e 2 ) e 4 { 1 − 2 χ 2 − ρ * } { 1 − 3 χ 2 − ρ * } + { Υ 3 e 4 [ 1 − 2 χ 2 − ρ * ] + Υ 3 e 2 [ − 1 + χ 2 + ρ * ] } { ( 1 − e 2 ) − ( 3 − e 2 ) χ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) ρ * }
− χ 2 + 1 2 4 e 4 { 3 9 − 3 7 e 2 − 2 e 4 − 1 3 Υ } χ 4 .
=
0.767874 (row 1) + 0.5678833 (row 2) - 0.950574 (row 3)
=
0.3851876 .
Now, let's group together like terms and examine, in particular, whether the coefficient of the cross-product, χ 2 ρ * ) , goes to zero.
Φ g r a v ( χ , ζ ) ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 3 Υ − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 { 2 e 2 − 2 + ( 2 − 2 e 2 ) ρ * }
+ [ 1 − 2 χ 2 − ρ * ] { 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 2 [ 1 − 3 4 χ 2 − ρ * ] − ( 1 − e 2 ) e 4 [ 1 − 3 χ 2 − ρ * ] + [ Υ 3 e 4 − Υ 3 e 2 ] [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − ( 3 − e 2 ) χ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) ρ * ] }
− { Υ 3 e 2 } [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − ( 3 − e 2 ) χ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) ρ * ] χ 2
− χ 2 + 1 2 4 e 4 { 3 9 − 3 7 e 2 − 2 e 4 − 1 3 Υ } χ 4 − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 { 3 χ 2 − 2 e 2 χ 2 }
=
1 3 Υ + ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 { 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ( 1 − ρ * ) }
+ [ 1 − 2 χ 2 − ρ * ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 4 { 4 e 2 [ 1 − 3 4 χ 2 − ρ * ] − 3 [ 1 − 3 χ 2 − ρ * ] + Υ [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − ( 3 − e 2 ) χ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) ρ * ] }
+ { Υ 3 e 2 } [ ( 1 − e 2 ) ρ * ] χ 2
− χ 2 + 1 2 4 e 4 { 3 9 − 3 7 e 2 − 2 e 4 − 1 3 Υ } χ 4 − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 { 3 χ 2 − 2 e 2 χ 2 } − { Υ 3 e 2 } [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − ( 3 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] χ 2
=
1 3 Υ + ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 { 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ( 1 − ρ * ) }
+ [ ( 1 − ρ * ) ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 4 { [ 4 e 2 − 3 + Υ ( 1 − e 2 ) ] ( 1 − ρ * ) } + [ − 2 χ 2 ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 4 { [ 4 e 2 − 3 + Υ ( 1 − e 2 ) ] ( 1 − ρ * ) }
+ [ ( 1 − ρ * ) ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 4 { [ − 3 e 2 + 9 − ( 3 − e 2 ) Υ ] χ 2 } + [ − 2 χ 2 ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 4 { [ − 3 e 2 + 9 − ( 3 − e 2 ) Υ ] χ 2 }
+ [ Υ ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 2 ] ρ * χ 2
− χ 2 + 1 2 4 e 4 { 3 9 − 3 7 e 2 − 2 e 4 − 1 3 Υ } χ 4 − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 { 3 χ 2 − 2 e 2 χ 2 } − { Υ 3 e 2 } [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − ( 3 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] χ 2
8th Try [ edit ]
Foundation [ edit ]
Density:
ρ * ≡ ρ ( χ , ζ ) ρ c
=
[ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] ,
Gravitational Potential:
Φ g r a v ( χ , ζ ) ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 I B T − A ℓ χ 2 − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 [ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) χ 4 ] .
Complete the Square [ edit ]
Again, let's rewrite the term inside square brackets on the RHS of the expression for the gravitational potential,
[ ] R H S
≡
[ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) χ 4 ] ,
in such a way that we effectively "complete the square." Assuming that the desired expression takes the form,
[ ] R H S
=
[ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 ζ 2 + B χ 2 ] [ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 ζ 2 + C χ 2 ]
=
( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 ( B + C ) ζ 2 χ 2 + B C χ 4 ,
we see that we must have,
( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 ( B + C )
=
2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 )
⇒ B
=
2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 − C ;
and we must also have,
B C
=
( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 )
⇒ B
=
( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) C .
Hence,
( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) C
=
2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 − C
⇒ 0
=
C 2 − 2 [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 ] C + ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) .
The pair of roots of this quadratic expression are,
C ±
=
[ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 ] ± 1 2 { 4 [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2 ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ] − 4 ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) } 1 / 2
=
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 { 1 ± [ 1 − ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2 ] 1 / 2 }
⇒ C ± ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2
=
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) { 1 ± [ 1 − ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2 ] 1 / 2 } .
Also, then,
B ± ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2
=
2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) − C ± ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2
=
2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) { 1 ± [ 1 − ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2 ] 1 / 2 }
=
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) { 1 ∓ [ 1 − ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2 ] 1 / 2 } .
NOTE: Given that ,
( A s s a ℓ 2 )
=
2 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 2 3 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 )
and,
( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 − 1 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ,
we can write,
Lambda vs Eccentricity
Λ ≡ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2
=
1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2 { [ 2 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 2 3 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] [ 1 2 − 1 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] }
=
1 6 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2 { 1 ( 1 − e 2 ) [ 2 − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) [ 2 − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] }
=
1 6 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2 { [ 1 ( 1 − e 2 ) − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] [ 2 − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] }
In summary, then, we can write,
B ± ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2
=
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) [ 1 ∓ ( 1 − Λ ) 1 / 2 ]
and,
C ± ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2
=
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) [ 1 ± ( 1 − Λ ) 1 / 2 ] ,
where, as illustrated by the inset "Lambda vs Eccentricity" plot, for all values of the eccentricity ( 0 < e ≤ 1 ) , the quantity, Λ , is greater than unity. It is clear, then, that both roots of the relevant quadratic equation are complex — i.e., they have imaginary components. But that's okay because the coefficients that appear in the right-hand-side, bracketed quartic expression appear in the combinations,
( B C ) ±
=
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2 ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) [ 1 − ( 1 − Λ ) 1 / 2 ] [ 1 + ( 1 − Λ ) 1 / 2 ] = ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2 ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) [ Λ ] = ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) ,
( B + C ) ±
=
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 [ 1 ∓ ( 1 − Λ ) 1 / 2 ] + ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 [ 1 ± ( 1 − Λ ) 1 / 2 ] = 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 ,
both of which are real.
9th Try [ edit ]
Starting Key Relations [ edit ]
Density:
ρ ( ϖ , z ) ρ c
=
[ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] ,
Gravitational Potential:
Φ g r a v ( ϖ , z ) ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 I B T − A ℓ χ 2 − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 [ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) χ 4 ] .
Vertical Pressure Gradient:
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ P ∂ ζ
=
ρ ρ c ⋅ [ 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 ζ − 2 A s ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ]
Play With Vertical Pressure Gradient [ edit ]
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ P ∂ ζ
=
[ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] [ 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 ζ − 2 A s ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ]
=
[ ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ] − χ 2 [ ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ] − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 [ ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ]
=
( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 − ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 4 − 2 A s χ 2 ) ζ − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 χ 2 ζ 3 − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 [ ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) ζ 3 + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 5 ]
=
[ ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) − ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 4 − 2 A s χ 2 ) ] ζ + [ 2 A s s a ℓ 2 − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) ] ζ 3 + [ − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ] ζ 5 .
Integrate over ζ gives …
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∫ [ ∂ P ∂ ζ ] d ζ
=
[ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − A s ) − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 4 − A s χ 2 ) ] ζ 2 + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 − A s s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − A s ) ] ζ 4 + 1 3 [ − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 ] ζ 6 + c o n s t
=
[ − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 + 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ζ 4 − 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 6 ] χ 0 + [ A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 + A s ζ 2 − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ] χ 2 + [ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ] χ 4 + c o n s t .
Now Play With Radial Pressure Gradient [ edit ]
[ 1 ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ Φ ∂ χ
=
ρ ρ c ⋅ { − 2 A ℓ χ + 1 2 [ 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 2 χ + 4 ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) χ 3 ] }
=
2 [ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) χ + A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 3 ]
=
2 [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) χ + A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 3 ] − 2 χ 2 [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) χ + A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 3 ] − 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) χ + A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 3 ]
=
2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) χ + 2 [ A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 + ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) ] χ 3 − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 5 + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 [ ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) χ − A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ζ 2 χ 3 ]
=
2 [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ] χ + 2 [ A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 + ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ] χ 3 − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 5
Add a term j 2 ∼ ( j 4 2 χ 4 + j 6 2 χ 6 ) to account for centrifugal acceleration …
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ P ∂ χ = [ 1 ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ Φ ∂ χ + j 2 χ 3 [ ρ ρ c ]
=
2 [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ] χ + 2 [ A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 + ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ] χ 3 − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 5 + j 2 χ 3 [ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
=
2 [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ] χ + 2 [ A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 + ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ] χ 3 − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 5
+ ( j 4 2 χ 4 + j 6 2 χ 6 ) χ 3 − ( j 4 2 χ 4 + j 6 2 χ 6 ) χ 3 [ χ 2 ] − ( j 4 2 χ 4 + j 6 2 χ 6 ) χ 3 [ ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
=
2 [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ] χ + 2 [ A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 + ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ] χ 3 − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 5
+ ( j 4 2 χ + j 6 2 χ 3 ) − ( j 4 2 χ + j 6 2 χ 3 ) [ ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] − ( j 4 2 χ 3 + j 6 2 χ 5 )
=
2 [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ] χ + 2 [ A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 + ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ] χ 3 − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 5
− [ j 4 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 − j 4 2 ] χ − [ j 4 2 + j 6 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 − j 6 2 ] χ 3 − [ j 6 2 ] χ 5
=
[ 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) − j 4 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + j 4 2 ] χ
+ [ 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 + 2 ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) − 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − j 4 2 − j 6 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + j 6 2 ] χ 3 + [ − j 6 2 − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ] χ 5
Integrate over χ gives …
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∫ [ ∂ P ∂ χ ] d χ
=
[ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) − 1 2 j 4 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 1 2 j 4 2 ] χ 2
+ [ 1 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 + 1 2 ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − 1 4 j 4 2 − 1 4 j 6 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 1 4 j 6 2 ] χ 4 − [ 1 6 j 6 2 + 1 3 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ] χ 6
Compare Pair of Integrations [ edit ]
Integration over ζ
Integration over χ
χ 0
− A s ζ 2 + 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 + 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ζ 4 − 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 6
none
χ 2
A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 + A s ζ 2 − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 )
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) − 1 2 j 4 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 1 2 j 4 2
χ 4
− A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2
1 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 + 1 2 ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − 1 4 j 4 2 − 1 4 j 6 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 1 4 j 6 2
χ 6
none
− 1 6 j 6 2 − 1 3 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2
Try, j 6 2 = [ − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ] and 1 2 j 4 2 = [ A ℓ + ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 2 ] .
Integration over ζ
Integration over χ
χ 0
− A s ζ 2 + 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 + 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ζ 4 − 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 6
none
χ 2
A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 + A s ζ 2 − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 )
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) − 1 2 j 4 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 1 2 j 4 2
=
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) − [ A ℓ + ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 2 ] ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + [ A ℓ + ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 2 ]
=
2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 2 [ 1 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
χ 4
− A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2
1 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 + 1 2 ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − 1 4 j 4 2 − 1 4 [ − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ] ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 1 4 [ − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ]
=
1 4 [ 2 ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) − 2 [ A ℓ + ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 2 ] ] = − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2
χ 6
none
0
What expression for j 4 2 is required in order to ensure that the χ 2 term is the same in both columns?
1 2 j 4 2 [ 1 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
=
[ A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 + A s ζ 2 − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ] − [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ]
=
[ A s ζ 2 − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ] + [ ( A ℓ ) − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ]
=
[ A s ζ 2 − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 + 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 ] + A ℓ [ 1 − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 2 ]
⇒ 1 2 j 4 2 [ 1 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] − A ℓ [ 1 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
=
1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + [ A s ] ζ 2 − 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 ] ζ 4
Now, considering the following three relations …
3 2 ( A s s a ℓ 2 )
=
( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ;
A s
=
A ℓ + e 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ;
e 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 )
=
2 − 3 A ℓ ;
we can write,
1 2 j 4 2 [ 1 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] − A ℓ [ 1 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
=
1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + [ A ℓ + e 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] ζ 2 − 1 3 [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] ζ 4
⇒ 3 j 4 2 [ 1 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] − 3 A ℓ [ 2 − 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
=
3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + 6 [ A ℓ + e 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] ζ 2 − 2 [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] ζ 4
=
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) { 2 ζ 4 + 3 ζ 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 6 e 2 ζ 2 } − 2 ζ 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 6 A ℓ ζ 2
=
− 2 ζ 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 6 A ℓ ζ 2 + [ 2 − 3 A ℓ ] { 2 ζ 4 + 3 ζ 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 6 e 2 ζ 2 } 1 e 2
=
− 2 ζ 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 − 3 A ℓ { 2 ζ 4 + 3 ζ 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 4 e 2 ζ 2 } 1 e 2 + { 4 ζ 4 + 6 ζ 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 1 2 e 2 ζ 2 } 1 e 2
⇒ 3 j 4 2 [ 1 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
=
− 2 ζ 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 3 A ℓ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 e 2 { [ 2 e 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 2 e 2 ζ 2 ] − [ 2 ζ 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) + 3 ζ 4 + 4 e 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ 2 ] } + { 4 ζ 4 + 6 ζ 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 1 2 e 2 ζ 2 } 1 e 2
10th Try [ edit ]
Repeating Key Relations [ edit ]
Density:
ρ ( ϖ , z ) ρ c
=
[ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] ,
Gravitational Potential:
Φ g r a v ( ϖ , z ) ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 I B T − A ℓ χ 2 − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 [ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) χ 4 ] .
Vertical Pressure Gradient:
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ P ∂ ζ
=
ρ ρ c ⋅ [ 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 ζ − 2 A s ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ]
From the above (9th Try) examination of the vertical pressure gradient, we determined that a reasonably good approximation for the normalized pressure throughout the configuration is given by the expression,
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∫ [ ∂ P ∂ ζ ] d ζ
=
[ − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 + 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ζ 4 − 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 6 ] χ 0 + [ A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 + A s ζ 2 − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ] χ 2 + [ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ] χ 4 + c o n s t .
If we set χ = 0 — that is, if we look along the vertical axis — this approximation should be particularly good, resulting in the expression,
P z ≡ { [ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∫ [ ∂ P ∂ ζ ] d ζ } χ = 0
=
P c * − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 + 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ζ 4 − 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 6 .
Note that in the limit that z → a s — that is, at the pole along the vertical (symmetry) axis where the P z should drop to zero — we should set ζ → ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 . This allows us to determine the central pressure.
P c *
=
A s ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 + 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 3
=
A s ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 2 A s ( 1 − e 2 ) + 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2
=
1 2 A s ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 6 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 .
This means that, along the vertical axis, the pressure gradient is,
P z ≡ { [ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∫ [ ∂ P ∂ ζ ] d ζ } χ = 0
=
P c * − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 + 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ζ 4 − 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 6 .
∂ P z ∂ ζ
=
− 2 A s ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ζ 3 − 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 5 .
This should match the more general "vertical pressure gradient " expression when we set, χ = 0 , that is,
{ [ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ P ∂ ζ } χ = 0
=
[ 1 − χ 2 0 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] ⋅ [ 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ χ 2 0 − 2 A s ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ]
=
[ − 2 A s ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ] + ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 [ 2 A s ζ − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ]
Yes! The expressions match!
Shift to ξ1 Coordinate [ edit ]
In an accompanying chapter , we defined the coordinate,
( ξ 1 a s ) 2
≡
( ϖ a ℓ ) 2 + ( z a s ) 2 = χ 2 + ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 .
Given that we want the pressure to be constant on ξ 1 surfaces, it seems plausible that ζ 2 should be replaced by ( 1 − e 2 ) ( ξ 1 / a s ) 2 = [ ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 + ζ 2 ] in the expression for P z . That is, we might expect the expression for the pressure at any point in the meridional plane to be,
P t e s t 0 1
=
P c * − A s [ ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 + ζ 2 ] 1 + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] [ ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 + ζ 2 ] 2 − 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 [ ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 + ζ 2 ] 3
=
P c * − A s [ ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 + ζ 2 ] 1 + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] [ ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ζ 4 ] − 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 [ ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 + ζ 2 ] [ ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ζ 4 ]
=
P c * − A s [ ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 + ζ 2 ] + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] [ ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ζ 4 ]
− 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 [ ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 6 + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 4 ζ 2 + χ 2 ζ 4 ] − 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 [ ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 4 ζ 2 + 2 χ 2 ζ 4 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 6 ]
=
χ 0 { P c * − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ζ 4 − 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 6 } + χ 2 { − A s ( 1 − e 2 ) + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ 2 − 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 − 2 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 }
+ χ 4 { 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 − 2 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ 2 − 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ 2 } + χ 6 { − 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 }
=
χ 0 { P c * − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ζ 4 − 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 6 } + χ 2 { − A s ( 1 − e 2 ) + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ 2 − A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 }
+ χ 4 { 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 − A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ 2 } + χ 6 { − 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 }
Integration over ζ
Pressure Guess
χ 0
− A s ζ 2 + 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 + 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ζ 4 − 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 6
P c * − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ζ 4 − 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 6
χ 2
A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 + A s ζ 2 − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 )
− A s ( 1 − e 2 ) + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ 2 − A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4
χ 4
− A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2
1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 − A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ 2
χ 6
none
− 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2
Compare Vertical Pressure Gradient Expressions [ edit ]
From our above (9th try) derivation we know that the vertical pressure gradient is given by the expression,
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ P ∂ ζ
=
[ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] [ 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 ζ − 2 A s ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ]
=
[ ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) − ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 4 − 2 A s χ 2 ) ] ζ + [ 2 A s s a ℓ 2 − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) ] ζ 3 + [ − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ] ζ 5 .
=
[ 2 A s ( χ 2 − 1 ) + 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − χ 2 ) χ 2 ] ζ + [ 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − χ 2 ) − 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 χ 2 + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ζ 3 + [ − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] ζ 5 .
By comparison, the vertical derivative of our "test01" pressure expression gives,
P t e s t 0 1
=
χ 0 { P c * − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ζ 4 − 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 6 } + χ 2 { − A s ( 1 − e 2 ) + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ 2 − A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 }
+ χ 4 { 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 − A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ 2 } + χ 6 { − 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 }
⇒ ∂ P t e s t 0 1 ∂ ζ
=
χ 0 { − 2 A s ζ + 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ζ 3 − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 5 } + χ 2 { 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ − 4 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 } + χ 4 { − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ }
=
ζ 1 { − 2 A s + 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 4 } + ζ 3 { 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] − 4 A s s a ℓ 2 χ 2 } + ζ 5 { − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 }
=
ζ 1 { 2 A s ( χ 2 − 1 ) + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ( 1 − χ 2 ) } + ζ 3 { 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − 2 χ 2 ) + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s } + ζ 5 { − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 }
Instead, try …
P t e s t 0 2 P c
=
p 2 ( ρ ρ c ) 2 + p 3 ( ρ ρ c ) 3
⇒ ∂ ∂ ζ [ P t e s t 0 2 P c ]
=
2 p 2 ( ρ ρ c ) ∂ ∂ ζ [ ρ ρ c ] + 3 p 3 ( ρ ρ c ) 2 ∂ ∂ ζ [ ρ ρ c ]
=
( ρ ρ c ) { 2 p 2 + 3 p 3 ( ρ ρ c ) } ∂ ∂ ζ [ ρ ρ c ]
=
( ρ ρ c ) { 2 p 2 + 3 p 3 [ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] } ∂ ∂ ζ [ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
=
( ρ ρ c ) { ( 2 p 2 + 3 p 3 ) − 3 p 3 χ 2 − 3 p 3 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 } [ − 2 ζ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
=
( ρ ρ c ) ( 1 − e 2 ) − 2 { 6 p 3 χ 2 ζ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 2 ( 2 p 2 + 3 p 3 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ + 6 p 3 ζ 3 }
Compare the term inside the curly braces with the term, from the beginning of this subsection, inside the square brackets, namely,
2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 ζ − 2 A s ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3
=
2 e 4 [ ( 3 − e 2 ) − Υ ] χ 2 ζ − [ 4 e 2 ( 1 − 1 3 Υ ) ] ζ + 4 3 e 4 [ 4 e 2 − 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) + Υ ] ζ 3
=
1 3 e 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) { 6 [ ( 3 − e 2 ) − Υ ] ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ζ − [ 1 2 e 2 ( 1 − 1 3 Υ ) ] ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ + 4 [ ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) + Υ ] ζ 3 } .
Pretty Close!!
Alternatively: according to the third term, we need to set,
6 p 3
=
4 [ ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) + Υ ]
⇒ Υ
=
3 2 p 3 + ( 3 − 4 e 2 )
in which case, the first coefficient must be given by the expression,
[ ( 3 − e 2 ) − Υ ]
=
( 3 − e 2 ) − 3 2 p 3 + ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) ] = [ 3 e 2 − 3 2 p 3 ] .
And, from the second coefficient, we find,
2 ( 2 p 2 + 3 p 3 )
=
[ 1 2 e 2 ( 1 − 1 3 Υ ) ]
⇒ 2 p 2
=
2 e 2 ( 3 − Υ ) − 3 p 3
=
− 3 p 3 + 6 e 2 − 2 e 2 [ 3 2 p 3 + ( 3 − 4 e 2 ) ]
=
− 3 p 3 + 6 e 2 − [ 3 e 2 p 3 + 6 e 2 − 8 e 4 ]
=
8 e 4 − 3 p 3 ( 1 + e 2 ) ;
or,
p 2
=
4 e 4 − ( 1 + e 2 ) [ ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) + Υ ]
=
4 e 4 − ( 1 + e 2 ) ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) − ( 1 + e 2 ) Υ
=
4 e 4 − [ 4 e 2 − 3 + 4 e 4 − 3 e 2 ] − ( 1 + e 2 ) Υ
=
3 − e 2 − ( 1 + e 2 ) Υ
SUMMARY:
P t e s t 0 2 P c
=
p 2 ( ρ ρ c ) 2 + p 3 ( ρ ρ c ) 3 ,
p 2
=
3 − e 2 − ( 1 + e 2 ) Υ = e 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) − e 2 Υ ,
p 3
=
2 3 [ ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) + Υ ] = e 4 ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) + 2 3 e 2 Υ .
Note: according to the first term, we need to set,
p 3
=
[ ( 3 − e 2 ) − Υ ]
⇒ Υ
=
[ ( 3 − e 2 ) − p 3 ] ,
in which case, the third coefficient must be given by the expression,
4 [ ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) + Υ ]
=
4 [ ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) + ( 3 − e 2 ) − p 3 ] = 4 [ 3 e 2 − p 3 ] .
And, from the second coefficient, we find,
2 ( 2 p 2 + 3 p 3 )
=
[ 1 2 e 2 ( 1 − 1 3 Υ ) ]
⇒ 2 p 2
=
2 e 2 ( 3 − Υ ) − 3 p 3
=
2 e 2 [ 3 − [ ( 3 − e 2 ) − p 3 ] ] − 3 p 3
=
2 e 2 [ e 2 + p 3 ] − 3 p 3
=
2 e 4 + ( 2 e 2 − 3 ) p 3 ;
or,
2 p 2
=
2 e 4 + ( 2 e 2 − 3 ) [ ( 3 − e 2 ) − Υ ]
=
2 e 4 + ( 2 e 2 − 3 ) ( 3 − e 2 ) − ( 2 e 2 − 3 ) Υ
=
2 e 4 + ( 6 e 2 − 2 e 4 − 9 + 3 e 2 ) − ( 2 e 2 − 3 ) Υ
=
9 ( e 2 − 1 ) − ( 2 e 2 − 3 ) Υ
Better yet, try …
P t e s t 0 3 P c
=
p 2 ( ρ ρ c ) 2 [ 1 − β ( 1 − ρ ρ c ) ] = p 2 ( ρ ρ c ) 2 [ ( 1 − β ) + β ( ρ ρ c ) ]
⇒ ∂ ∂ ζ [ P t e s t 0 3 P c ]
=
⋯
where, in the case of a spherically symmetric parabolic-density configuration , β = 1 / 2 . Well … this wasn't a bad idea, but as it turns out, this "test03" expression is no different from the "test02" guess. Specifically, the "test03" expression can be rewritten as,
P t e s t 0 3 P c
=
p 2 ( 1 − β ) ( ρ ρ c ) 2 + p 2 β ( ρ ρ c ) 3 ,
which has the same form as the "test02" expression.
From above, we understand that, analytically,
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ P ∂ ζ
=
[ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] [ 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 ζ − 2 A s ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ]
=
[ ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) − ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 4 − 2 A s χ 2 ) ] ζ + [ 2 A s s a ℓ 2 − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) ] ζ 3 + [ − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ] ζ 5
=
[ 2 A s ( χ 2 − 1 ) + 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − χ 2 ) χ 2 ] ζ + [ 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − χ 2 ) − 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 χ 2 + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ζ 3 + [ − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] ζ 5 .
Also from above, we have shown that if,
P t e s t 0 2 P c
=
p 2 ( ρ ρ c ) 2 + p 3 ( ρ ρ c ) 3
SUMMARY from test02:
p 2
=
3 − e 2 − ( 1 + e 2 ) Υ = e 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) − e 2 Υ ,
p 3
=
2 3 [ ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) + Υ ] = e 4 ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) + 2 3 e 2 Υ .
⇒ ∂ ∂ ζ [ P t e s t 0 2 P c ]
=
( ρ ρ c ) ( 1 − e 2 ) − 2 { 6 p 3 χ 2 ζ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 2 ( 2 p 2 + 3 p 3 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ + 6 p 3 ζ 3 }
=
( ρ ρ c ) ( 1 − e 2 ) − 2 { 6 [ e 4 ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) + 2 3 e 2 Υ ] χ 2 ζ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 2 [ 2 e 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) + 3 e 4 ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ] ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ + 6 [ e 4 ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) + 2 3 e 2 Υ ] ζ 3 }
Here (test04), we add a term that is linear in the normalized density, which means,
P t e s t 0 4 P c
=
P t e s t 0 2 P c + p 1 ( ρ ρ c )
⇒ ∂ ∂ ζ [ P t e s t 0 4 P c ]
=
∂ ∂ ζ [ P t e s t 0 2 P c ] + ∂ ∂ ζ [ p 1 ( ρ ρ c ) ] = ∂ ∂ ζ [ P t e s t 0 2 P c ] + p 1 ∂ ∂ ζ [ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
See Also [ edit ]