ParabolicDensity/Axisymmetric/Structure: Difference between revisions
| Line 436: | Line 436: | ||
<!-- NOTE: The integration constant must be the dimensionless central pressure, <math>P_c^*</math>. --> | <!-- NOTE: The integration constant must be the dimensionless central pressure, <math>P_c^*</math>. --> | ||
If I am interpreting this correctly, <math>P_\mathrm{deduced}^*</math> should tell how the normalized pressure varies with <math>\zeta</math>, for a fixed choice of <math>0 \le \chi \le 1</math>. Again, for a fixed choice of <math>\chi</math>, we want to specify the value of the "const." such that <math>P_\mathrm{deduced}^* = 0</math> at the surface of the configuration; but at the surface, it must also be true that <math>\chi = </math> | If I am interpreting this correctly, <math>P_\mathrm{deduced}^*</math> should tell how the normalized pressure varies with <math>\zeta</math>, for a fixed choice of <math>0 \le \chi \le 1</math>. Again, for a fixed choice of <math>\chi</math>, we want to specify the value of the "const." — hereafter, <math>C_\chi</math> — such that <math>P_\mathrm{deduced}^* = 0</math> at the surface of the configuration; but at the surface, it must also be true that, | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right">at the surface … </td> | |||
<td align="right"><math>\zeta^2</math></td> | |||
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
(1-e^2)( 1 - \chi^2 ) \, . | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
Hence, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"><math>-~C_\chi</math></td> | |||
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\biggl[ (A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - A_s ) - (A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^4 - A_s \chi^2)\biggr]\biggl[ (1-e^2)( 1 - \chi^2 ) \biggr] | |||
+ \frac{1}{2}\biggl[ A_{ss} a_\ell^2 - A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - (1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - A_s )\biggr]\biggl[ (1-e^2)( 1 - \chi^2 ) \biggr]^2 | |||
+ \frac{1}{3}\biggl[ - (1-e^2)^{-1}A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \biggr] \biggl[ (1-e^2)( 1 - \chi^2 ) \biggr]^3 | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
====Now Play With Radial Pressure Gradient==== | ====Now Play With Radial Pressure Gradient==== | ||
Revision as of 18:03, 8 November 2024
Parabolic Density Distribution
Part I: Gravitational Potential
|
Part II: Spherical Structures
|
Part III: Axisymmetric Equilibrium Structures |
Part IV: Triaxial Equilibrium Structures (Exploration)
|
Axisymmetric (Oblate) Equilibrium Structures
Tentative Summary
Known Relations
| Density: |
|
|
|
| Gravitational Potential: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and, |
|
|
where, and , and the relevant index symbol expressions are:
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where the eccentricity,
Drawing from our separate "6th Try" discussion — and as has been highlighted here for example — for the axisymmetric configurations under consideration, the and components of the Euler equation become, respectively,
|
Multiplying the component through by length and dividing through by the square of the velocity , we have,
|
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
Multiplying the component through by length and dividing through by the square of the velocity , we have,
| : |
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
Play With Vertical Pressure Gradient
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Integrate over gives …
|
|
||
|
|
If I am interpreting this correctly, should tell how the normalized pressure varies with , for a fixed choice of . Again, for a fixed choice of , we want to specify the value of the "const." — hereafter, — such that at the surface of the configuration; but at the surface, it must also be true that,
| at the surface … |
|
Hence,
|
|
Now Play With Radial Pressure Gradient
After multiplying through by , the last term on the RHS of the component is given by the expression,
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
If we replace the normalized pressure by , the first term on the RHS of the component becomes,
|
|
||
|
|
Hence,
|
|
= |
|
10th Try
Repeating Key Relations
| Density: |
|
|
|
| Gravitational Potential: |
|
|
|
| Vertical Pressure Gradient: |
|
From the above (9th Try) examination of the vertical pressure gradient, we determined that a reasonably good approximation for the normalized pressure throughout the configuration is given by the expression,
|
|
If we set — that is, if we look along the vertical axis — this approximation should be particularly good, resulting in the expression,
|
|
|
Note that in the limit that — that is, at the pole along the vertical (symmetry) axis where the should drop to zero — we should set . This allows us to determine the central pressure.
|
This means that, along the vertical axis, the pressure gradient is,
|
|
|
|
This should match the more general "vertical pressure gradient" expression when we set, , that is,
|
|
||
|
|
Yes! The expressions match!
See Also
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |