ParabolicDensity/Axisymmetric/Structure: Difference between revisions
| Line 526: | Line 526: | ||
+ 4\biggl[- A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 \biggr]\chi^3 | + 4\biggl[- A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 \biggr]\chi^3 | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
Hence, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math> | |||
\frac{1}{\chi^3} \cdot \frac{j^2}{(\pi G\rho_c a_\ell^4)} \cdot \frac{\rho}{\rho_c} | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
= | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\biggl[ \frac{\partial P_\mathrm{deduced}^*}{\partial \chi} \biggr] | |||
- \frac{\rho}{\rho_c} \cdot \frac{\partial }{\partial \chi}\biggl[ \frac{\Phi_\mathrm{grav}}{(-~\pi G\rho_c a_\ell^2)} \biggr] | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Revision as of 22:49, 7 November 2024
Parabolic Density Distribution
Part I: Gravitational Potential
|
Part II: Spherical Structures
|
Part III: Axisymmetric Equilibrium Structures |
Part IV: Triaxial Equilibrium Structures (Exploration)
|
Axisymmetric (Oblate) Equilibrium Structures
Tentative Summary
Known Relations
| Density: |
|
|
|
| Gravitational Potential: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and, |
|
|
where, and , and the relevant index symbol expressions are:
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where the eccentricity,
Drawing from our separate "6th Try" discussion — and as has been highlighted here for example — for the axisymmetric configurations under consideration, the and components of the Euler equation become, respectively,
|
Multiplying the component through by length and dividing through by the square of the velocity , we have,
|
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
Multiplying the component through by length and dividing through by the square of the velocity , we have,
| : |
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
Play With Vertical Pressure Gradient
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Integrate over gives …
|
|
||
|
|
NOTE: The integration constant must be the dimensionless central pressure, .
Now Play With Radial Pressure Gradient
After multiplying through by , the last term on the RHS of the component is given by the expression,
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
If we replace the normalized pressure by , the first term on the RHS of the component becomes,
|
|
||
|
|
Hence,
|
|
= |
|
10th Try
Repeating Key Relations
| Density: |
|
|
|
| Gravitational Potential: |
|
|
|
| Vertical Pressure Gradient: |
|
From the above (9th Try) examination of the vertical pressure gradient, we determined that a reasonably good approximation for the normalized pressure throughout the configuration is given by the expression,
|
|
If we set — that is, if we look along the vertical axis — this approximation should be particularly good, resulting in the expression,
|
|
|
Note that in the limit that — that is, at the pole along the vertical (symmetry) axis where the should drop to zero — we should set . This allows us to determine the central pressure.
|
This means that, along the vertical axis, the pressure gradient is,
|
|
|
|
This should match the more general "vertical pressure gradient" expression when we set, , that is,
|
|
||
|
|
Yes! The expressions match!
See Also
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |