ParabolicDensity/Axisymmetric/Structure: Difference between revisions
| Line 409: | Line 409: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td align="right"><math>\biggl[\frac{1}{(\pi G\rho_c^2 a_\ell^2)} \biggr] \int \biggl[\frac{\partial P}{\partial \zeta}\biggr] d\zeta </math></td> | <td align="right"><math>P^*_\mathrm{deduced} \equiv \biggl[\frac{1}{(\pi G\rho_c^2 a_\ell^2)} \biggr] \int \biggl[\frac{\partial P}{\partial \zeta}\biggr] d\zeta </math></td> | ||
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td> | <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
Revision as of 22:14, 7 November 2024
Parabolic Density Distribution
Part I: Gravitational Potential
|
Part II: Spherical Structures
|
Part III: Axisymmetric Equilibrium Structures |
Part IV: Triaxial Equilibrium Structures (Exploration)
|
Axisymmetric (Oblate) Equilibrium Structures
Tentative Summary
Known Relations
| Density: |
|
|
|
| Gravitational Potential: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and, |
|
|
where, and , and the relevant index symbol expressions are:
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where the eccentricity,
Drawing from our separate "6th Try" discussion — and as has been highlighted here for example — for the axisymmetric configurations under consideration, the and components of the Euler equation become, respectively,
|
Multiplying the component through by length and dividing through by the square of the velocity , we have,
|
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
Multiplying the component through by length and dividing through by the square of the velocity , we have,
| : |
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
Play With Vertical Pressure Gradient
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Integrate over gives …
|
|
||
|
|
Now Play With Radial Pressure Gradient
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
10th Try
Repeating Key Relations
| Density: |
|
|
|
| Gravitational Potential: |
|
|
|
| Vertical Pressure Gradient: |
|
From the above (9th Try) examination of the vertical pressure gradient, we determined that a reasonably good approximation for the normalized pressure throughout the configuration is given by the expression,
|
|
If we set — that is, if we look along the vertical axis — this approximation should be particularly good, resulting in the expression,
|
|
|
Note that in the limit that — that is, at the pole along the vertical (symmetry) axis where the should drop to zero — we should set . This allows us to determine the central pressure.
|
This means that, along the vertical axis, the pressure gradient is,
|
|
|
|
This should match the more general "vertical pressure gradient" expression when we set, , that is,
|
|
||
|
|
Yes! The expressions match!
See Also
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |