ParabolicDensity/Axisymmetric/Structure: Difference between revisions

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Line 690: Line 690:


<b><font color="red">Yes! The expressions match!</font></b>
<b><font color="red">Yes! The expressions match!</font></b>
====Test04====
From above, we understand that, analytically,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\biggl[\frac{1}{(\pi G\rho_c^2 a_\ell^2)} \biggr] \frac{\partial P}{\partial \zeta}</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl[1 - \chi^2 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} \biggr] \biggl[
2A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^2\zeta - 2A_s \zeta 
+  2A_{ss} a_\ell^2  \zeta^3 
\biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl[ (2A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - 2A_s ) - (2A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^4 - 2A_s \chi^2)\biggr]\zeta 
+  \biggl[ 2A_{ss} a_\ell^2  -  2A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - (1-e^2)^{-1}(2A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - 2A_s )\biggr]\zeta^3
+ \biggl[ - (1-e^2)^{-1}2A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \biggr] \zeta^5
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl[ 2A_s (\chi^2-1) + 2A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 (1 - \chi^2)\chi^2 \biggr]\zeta 
+  \biggl[ 2A_{ss} a_\ell^2(1  -  \chi^2 )
- 2A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 (1-e^2)^{-1}\chi^2 + 2(1-e^2)^{-1}A_s \biggr]\zeta^3
+ \biggl[ - 2A_{ss} a_\ell^2 (1-e^2)^{-1}\biggr] \zeta^5
\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
Also from above, we have shown that if,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\frac{P_\mathrm{test02}}{P_c}</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
p_2 \biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)^2 + p_3\biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)^3 
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
<table border="1" width="60%" align="center" cellpadding="5"><tr><td align="left">
SUMMARY from test02:
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>p_2</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
3 - e^2 - (1+e^2)\Upsilon = e^4(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) - e^2\Upsilon \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>
p_3
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{2}{3}\biggl[(4e^2-3) + \Upsilon \biggr]
=
e^4(A_{ss}a_\ell^2) + \frac{2}{3}e^2\Upsilon \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</td></tr></table>
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{\partial}{\partial \zeta}\biggl[\frac{P_\mathrm{test02}}{P_c}\biggr]</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)(1-e^2)^{-2}\biggl\{
6p_3\chi^2\zeta(1-e^2) - 2(2p_2 + 3p_3)(1-e^2)\zeta  + 6p_3\zeta^3 
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)(1-e^2)^{-2}\biggl\{
6\biggl[ e^4(A_{ss}a_\ell^2) + \frac{2}{3}e^2\Upsilon \biggr]\chi^2\zeta(1-e^2)
- 2\biggl[2e^4(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) + 3e^4(A_{ss}a_\ell^2) \biggr](1-e^2)\zeta 
+ 6\biggl[ e^4(A_{ss}a_\ell^2) + \frac{2}{3}e^2\Upsilon \biggr]\zeta^3 
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
----
Here (test04), we add a term that is linear in the normalized density, which means,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\frac{P_\mathrm{test04}}{P_c}</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{P_\mathrm{test02}}{P_c}
+
p_1 \biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr) 
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{\partial}{\partial \zeta}\biggl[\frac{P_\mathrm{test04}}{P_c}\biggr]</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{\partial}{\partial \zeta}\biggl[\frac{P_\mathrm{test02}}{P_c}\biggr]
+
\frac{\partial}{\partial \zeta}\biggl[p_1 \biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)\biggr]
=
\frac{\partial}{\partial \zeta}\biggl[\frac{P_\mathrm{test02}}{P_c}\biggr]
+
p_1 \frac{\partial}{\partial \zeta}\biggl[ 1 - \chi^2 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1}\biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>


=See Also=
=See Also=


{{ SGFfooter }}
{{ SGFfooter }}

Revision as of 20:13, 7 November 2024

Parabolic Density Distribution


Part I:   Gravitational Potential

 


Part II:   Spherical Structures

 


Part III:   Axisymmetric Equilibrium Structures

 Old: 1st thru 7th tries
 Old: 8th thru 10th tries


Part IV:   Triaxial Equilibrium Structures (Exploration)

 

Axisymmetric (Oblate) Equilibrium Structures

Tentative Summary

Known Relations

Density:

ρ(ϖ,z)ρc

=

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1],

Gravitational Potential:

Φgrav(ϖ,z)(−πGρcaℓ2)

=

12IBT−Aℓχ2−Asζ2+12[(Assaℓ2)ζ4+2(Aℓsaℓ2)χ2ζ2+(Aℓℓaℓ2)χ4].

Vertical Pressure Gradient: [1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ =

ρρc⋅[2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

where, χ≡ϖ/aℓ and ζ≡z/aℓ, and the relevant index symbol expressions are:

IBT =

2Aℓ+As(1−e2)=2(1−e2)1/2[sin−1ee];

Aℓ

=

1e2[sin−1ee−(1−e2)1/2](1−e2)1/2;

As =

2e2[(1−e2)−1/2−sin−1ee](1−e2)1/2;

aℓ2Aℓℓ

=

14e4{−(3+2e2)(1−e2)+3(1−e2)1/2[sin−1ee]};

32aℓ2Ass

=

(4e2−3)e4(1−e2)+3(1−e2)1/2e4[sin−1ee];

aℓ2Aℓs

=

1e4{(3−e2)−3(1−e2)1/2[sin−1ee]},

where the eccentricity,

e≡[1−(asaℓ)2]1/2.

Drawing from our separate "6th Try" discussion — and as has been highlighted here for example — for the axisymmetric configurations under consideration, the e^z and e^ϖ components of the Euler equation become, respectively,

e^z:    

0

=

[1ρ∂P∂z+∂Φ∂z]

e^ϖ:    

j2ϖ3

=

[1ρ∂P∂ϖ+∂Φ∂ϖ]

Multiplying through by length (aℓ) and dividing through by the square of the velocity (πGρcaℓ2), we have,

e^z:    

0

=

[1ρ∂P∂z+∂Φ∂z]aℓ(πGρcaℓ2)

 

 

=

ρcρ⋅∂∂ζ[P(πGρc2aℓ2)]−∂∂ζ[Φ(−πGρcaℓ2)]

e^ϖ:    

j2ϖ3⋅aℓ(πGρcaℓ2)

=

[1ρ∂P∂ϖ+∂Φ∂ϖ]aℓ(πGρcaℓ2)

 

⇒1χ3⋅j2(πGρcaℓ4)

=

ρcρ⋅∂∂χ[P(πGρc2aℓ2)]−∂∂χ[Φ(−πGρcaℓ2)]

9th Try

Starting Key Relations

Density:

ρ(ϖ,z)ρc

=

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1],

Gravitational Potential:

Φgrav(ϖ,z)(−πGρcaℓ2)

=

12IBT−Aℓχ2−Asζ2+12[(Assaℓ2)ζ4+2(Aℓsaℓ2)χ2ζ2+(Aℓℓaℓ2)χ4].

Vertical Pressure Gradient: [1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ =

ρρc⋅[2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

Play With Vertical Pressure Gradient

[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ =

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1][2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

  =

[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)ζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]−χ2[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)ζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]−ζ2(1−e2)−1[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)ζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

  =

(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)ζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3−(2Aℓsaℓ2χ4−2Asχ2)ζ−2Assaℓ2χ2ζ3−(1−e2)−1[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)ζ3+2Assaℓ2ζ5]

  =

[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)−(2Aℓsaℓ2χ4−2Asχ2)]ζ+[2Assaℓ2−2Assaℓ2χ2−(1−e2)−1(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)]ζ3+[−(1−e2)−12Assaℓ2]ζ5.

Integrate over ζ gives …

[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∫[∂P∂ζ]dζ =

[(Aℓsaℓ2χ2−As)−(Aℓsaℓ2χ4−Asχ2)]ζ2+12[Assaℓ2−Assaℓ2χ2−(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2χ2−As)]ζ4+13[−(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2]ζ6+const

  =

[−Asζ2+12Assaℓ2ζ4+12(1−e2)−1Asζ4−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ6]χ0+[Aℓsaℓ2ζ2+Asζ2−12Assaℓ2ζ4−12(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)]χ2+[−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2]χ4+const.

Now Play With Radial Pressure Gradient

[1(−πGρcaℓ2)]∂Φ∂χ =

ρρc⋅{−2Aℓχ+12[4(Aℓsaℓ2)ζ2χ+4(Aℓℓaℓ2)χ3]}

  =

2[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1][(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)χ+Aℓℓaℓ2χ3]

  =

2[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)χ+Aℓℓaℓ2χ3]−2χ2[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)χ+Aℓℓaℓ2χ3]−2ζ2(1−e2)−1[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)χ+Aℓℓaℓ2χ3]

  =

2(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)χ+2[Aℓℓaℓ2+(Aℓ−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2)]χ3−2Aℓℓaℓ2χ5+2(1−e2)−1[(Aℓζ2−Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)χ−Aℓℓaℓ2ζ2χ3]

  =

2[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)+(1−e2)−1(Aℓζ2−Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)]χ+2[Aℓℓaℓ2+(Aℓ−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2)−(1−e2)−1Aℓℓaℓ2ζ2]χ3−2Aℓℓaℓ2χ5

10th Try

Repeating Key Relations

Density:

ρ(ϖ,z)ρc

=

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1],

Gravitational Potential:

Φgrav(ϖ,z)(−πGρcaℓ2)

=

12IBT−Aℓχ2−Asζ2+12[(Assaℓ2)ζ4+2(Aℓsaℓ2)χ2ζ2+(Aℓℓaℓ2)χ4].

Vertical Pressure Gradient: [1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ =

ρρc⋅[2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

From the above (9th Try) examination of the vertical pressure gradient, we determined that a reasonably good approximation for the normalized pressure throughout the configuration is given by the expression,

[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∫[∂P∂ζ]dζ =

[−Asζ2+12Assaℓ2ζ4+12(1−e2)−1Asζ4−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ6]χ0+[Aℓsaℓ2ζ2+Asζ2−12Assaℓ2ζ4−12(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)]χ2+[−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2]χ4+const.

If we set χ=0 — that is, if we look along the vertical axis — this approximation should be particularly good, resulting in the expression,

Pz≡{[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∫[∂P∂ζ]dζ}χ=0 =

Pc*−Asζ2+12Assaℓ2ζ4+12(1−e2)−1Asζ4−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ6.

Note that in the limit that z→as — that is, at the pole along the vertical (symmetry) axis where the Pz should drop to zero — we should set ζ→(1−e2)1/2. This allows us to determine the central pressure.

Pc* =

As(1−e2)−12Assaℓ2(1−e2)2−12(1−e2)−1As(1−e2)2+13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2(1−e2)3

  =

As(1−e2)−12As(1−e2)+13Assaℓ2(1−e2)2−12Assaℓ2(1−e2)2

  =

12As(1−e2)−16Assaℓ2(1−e2)2.

This means that, along the vertical axis, the pressure gradient is,

Pz≡{[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∫[∂P∂ζ]dζ}χ=0 =

Pc*−Asζ2+12Assaℓ2ζ4+12(1−e2)−1Asζ4−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ6.

∂Pz∂ζ =

−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3+2(1−e2)−1Asζ3−2(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ5.

This should match the more general "vertical pressure gradient" expression when we set, χ=0, that is,

{[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ}χ=0 =

[1−χ20−ζ2(1−e2)−1]⋅[2Aℓsaℓ2ζχ20−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

  =

[−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]+ζ2(1−e2)−1[2Asζ−2Assaℓ2ζ3]

Yes! The expressions match!

See Also

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |