|
|
| Line 690: |
Line 690: |
|
| |
|
| <b><font color="red">Yes! The expressions match!</font></b> | | <b><font color="red">Yes! The expressions match!</font></b> |
|
| |
| ====Test04====
| |
|
| |
| From above, we understand that, analytically,
| |
| <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right"><math>\biggl[\frac{1}{(\pi G\rho_c^2 a_\ell^2)} \biggr] \frac{\partial P}{\partial \zeta}</math></td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \biggl[1 - \chi^2 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} \biggr] \biggl[
| |
| 2A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^2\zeta - 2A_s \zeta
| |
| + 2A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \zeta^3
| |
| \biggr]
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right"> </td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \biggl[ (2A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - 2A_s ) - (2A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^4 - 2A_s \chi^2)\biggr]\zeta
| |
| + \biggl[ 2A_{ss} a_\ell^2 - 2A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - (1-e^2)^{-1}(2A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - 2A_s )\biggr]\zeta^3
| |
| + \biggl[ - (1-e^2)^{-1}2A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \biggr] \zeta^5
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right"> </td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \biggl[ 2A_s (\chi^2-1) + 2A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 (1 - \chi^2)\chi^2 \biggr]\zeta
| |
| + \biggl[ 2A_{ss} a_\ell^2(1 - \chi^2 )
| |
| - 2A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 (1-e^2)^{-1}\chi^2 + 2(1-e^2)^{-1}A_s \biggr]\zeta^3
| |
| + \biggl[ - 2A_{ss} a_\ell^2 (1-e^2)^{-1}\biggr] \zeta^5
| |
| \, .
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
|
| |
| Also from above, we have shown that if,
| |
|
| |
| <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right"><math>\frac{P_\mathrm{test02}}{P_c}</math></td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| p_2 \biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)^2 + p_3\biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)^3
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
|
| |
| <table border="1" width="60%" align="center" cellpadding="5"><tr><td align="left">
| |
|
| |
| SUMMARY from test02:
| |
|
| |
| <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>p_2</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| 3 - e^2 - (1+e^2)\Upsilon = e^4(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) - e^2\Upsilon \, ,</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right"><math>
| |
| p_3
| |
| </math></td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{2}{3}\biggl[(4e^2-3) + \Upsilon \biggr]
| |
| =
| |
| e^4(A_{ss}a_\ell^2) + \frac{2}{3}e^2\Upsilon \, .
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
| </td></tr></table>
| |
|
| |
| <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right"><math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{\partial}{\partial \zeta}\biggl[\frac{P_\mathrm{test02}}{P_c}\biggr]</math></td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)(1-e^2)^{-2}\biggl\{
| |
| 6p_3\chi^2\zeta(1-e^2) - 2(2p_2 + 3p_3)(1-e^2)\zeta + 6p_3\zeta^3
| |
| \biggr\}
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right"> </td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)(1-e^2)^{-2}\biggl\{
| |
| 6\biggl[ e^4(A_{ss}a_\ell^2) + \frac{2}{3}e^2\Upsilon \biggr]\chi^2\zeta(1-e^2)
| |
| - 2\biggl[2e^4(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) + 3e^4(A_{ss}a_\ell^2) \biggr](1-e^2)\zeta
| |
| + 6\biggl[ e^4(A_{ss}a_\ell^2) + \frac{2}{3}e^2\Upsilon \biggr]\zeta^3
| |
| \biggr\}
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ----
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Here (test04), we add a term that is linear in the normalized density, which means,
| |
|
| |
| <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right"><math>\frac{P_\mathrm{test04}}{P_c}</math></td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{P_\mathrm{test02}}{P_c}
| |
| +
| |
| p_1 \biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right"><math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{\partial}{\partial \zeta}\biggl[\frac{P_\mathrm{test04}}{P_c}\biggr]</math></td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{\partial}{\partial \zeta}\biggl[\frac{P_\mathrm{test02}}{P_c}\biggr]
| |
| +
| |
| \frac{\partial}{\partial \zeta}\biggl[p_1 \biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)\biggr]
| |
| =
| |
| \frac{\partial}{\partial \zeta}\biggl[\frac{P_\mathrm{test02}}{P_c}\biggr]
| |
| +
| |
| p_1 \frac{\partial}{\partial \zeta}\biggl[ 1 - \chi^2 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1}\biggr]
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
|
| |
|
| =See Also= | | =See Also= |
|
| |
|
| {{ SGFfooter }} | | {{ SGFfooter }} |
Parabolic Density Distribution
Axisymmetric (Oblate) Equilibrium Structures
Tentative Summary
Known Relations
| Density: |
|
|
|
| Gravitational Potential: |
|
|
|
| Vertical Pressure Gradient: |
|
|
|
where, and , and the relevant index symbol expressions are:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where the eccentricity,
Drawing from our separate "6th Try" discussion — and as has been highlighted here for example — for the axisymmetric configurations under consideration, the and components of the Euler equation become, respectively,
| : |
|
=
|
|
| : |
|
=
|
|
|
Multiplying through by length and dividing through by the square of the velocity , we have,
| : |
|
=
|
|
| |
|
=
|
|
| : |
|
=
|
|
| |
|
=
|
|
9th Try
Starting Key Relations
| Density: |
|
|
|
| Gravitational Potential: |
|
|
|
| Vertical Pressure Gradient: |
|
|
|
Play With Vertical Pressure Gradient
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Integrate over gives …
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Now Play With Radial Pressure Gradient
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
10th Try
Repeating Key Relations
| Density: |
|
|
|
| Gravitational Potential: |
|
|
|
| Vertical Pressure Gradient: |
|
|
|
From the above (9th Try) examination of the vertical pressure gradient, we determined that a reasonably good approximation for the normalized pressure throughout the configuration is given by the expression,
|
|
|
If we set — that is, if we look along the vertical axis — this approximation should be particularly good, resulting in the expression,
|
|
|
|
Note that in the limit that — that is, at the pole along the vertical (symmetry) axis where the should drop to zero — we should set . This allows us to determine the central pressure.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
This means that, along the vertical axis, the pressure gradient is,
|
|
|
|
|
|
This should match the more general "vertical pressure gradient" expression when we set, , that is,
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Yes! The expressions match!
See Also