ParabolicDensity/Axisymmetric/Structure: Difference between revisions

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Line 511: Line 511:
</table>
</table>


====Compare Pair of Integrations====
<table border="1" align="center" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
  <td align="center" width="6%">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center" width="47%">Integration over <math>\zeta</math></td>
  <td align="center">Integration over <math>\chi</math></td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center"><math>\chi^0</math></td>
  <td align="right"><math>-A_s \zeta^2 + \frac{1}{2}A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 + \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}A_s\zeta^4 - \frac{1}{3}(1-e^2)^{-1}A_{ss} a_\ell^2  \zeta^6 </math></td>
  <td align="left">none</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center"><math>\chi^2</math></td>
  <td align="right">
<math>A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 + A_s\zeta^2 - \frac{1}{2}A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 - \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 )</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>(A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 - A_\ell ) + (1-e^2)^{-1}(A_\ell\zeta^2 - A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 ) - \frac{1}{2}j_4^2\zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} + \frac{1}{2}j_4^2</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center"><math>\chi^4</math></td>
  <td align="right">
<math>- A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 </math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\frac{1}{2}A_{\ell\ell} a_\ell^2 + \frac{1}{2}(A_\ell - A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 ) - \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}A_{\ell\ell} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2
- \frac{1}{4}j_4^2 - \frac{1}{4}j_6^2\zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} + \frac{1}{4}j_6^2  </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center"><math>\chi^6</math></td>
  <td align="right">
none
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- \frac{1}{6}j_6^2 - \frac{1}{3}A_{\ell\ell} a_\ell^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
Try, <math>j_6^2 = [-2A_{\ell\ell}a_\ell^2]</math> and <math>\frac{1}{2}j_4^2 = [A_\ell + (A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^2 ]</math>.
<table border="1" align="center" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
  <td align="center" width="6%">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center" width="47%">Integration over <math>\zeta</math></td>
  <td align="center">Integration over <math>\chi</math></td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center"><math>\chi^0</math></td>
  <td align="right"><math>-A_s \zeta^2 + \frac{1}{2}A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 + \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}A_s\zeta^4 - \frac{1}{3}(1-e^2)^{-1}A_{ss} a_\ell^2  \zeta^6 </math></td>
  <td align="left">none</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center"><math>\chi^2</math></td>
  <td align="right"><math>A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 + A_s\zeta^2
- \frac{1}{2}A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 - \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 )</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
(A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 - A_\ell ) + (1-e^2)^{-1}(A_\ell\zeta^2 - A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 ) - \frac{1}{2}j_4^2\zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} + \frac{1}{2}j_4^2
</math>
<br /><math>=</math><br />
<math>
(A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 - A_\ell ) + (1-e^2)^{-1}(A_\ell\zeta^2 - A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 ) - [A_\ell + (A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^2 ]\zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} + [A_\ell + (A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^2 ]
</math>
<br /><math>=</math><br />
<math>
2(A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^2\biggl[1 - \zeta^2 (1-e^2)^{-1} \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center"><math>\chi^4</math></td>
  <td align="right">
<math>- A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 </math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2}A_{\ell\ell} a_\ell^2 + \frac{1}{2}(A_\ell - A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 ) - \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}A_{\ell\ell} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2
- \frac{1}{4}j_4^2 - \frac{1}{4}[-2A_{\ell\ell}a_\ell^2]\zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} + \frac{1}{4}[-2A_{\ell\ell}a_\ell^2] 
</math>
<br /><math>=</math><br />
<math>
\frac{1}{4}\biggl[2(A_\ell - A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 ) - 2[A_\ell + (A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^2 ] \biggr] = - A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center"><math>\chi^6</math></td>
  <td align="right">
none
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
0
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
What expression for <math>j_4^2</math> is required in order to ensure that the <math>\chi^2</math> term is the same in both columns?
<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>
\frac{1}{2}j_4^2 \biggl[ 1 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1}\biggr]</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl[ A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 + A_s\zeta^2 - \frac{1}{2}A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 - \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 )\biggr]
-
\biggl[(A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 - A_\ell ) + (1-e^2)^{-1}(A_\ell\zeta^2 - A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 )  \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl[ A_s\zeta^2 - \frac{1}{2}A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 - \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 )\biggr]
+
\biggl[( A_\ell ) - (1-e^2)^{-1}(A_\ell\zeta^2 ) + (1-e^2)^{-1}( A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 ) \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl[ A_s\zeta^2 - \frac{1}{2}A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 + \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \zeta^4\biggr]
+
A_\ell\biggl[1 - (1-e^2)^{-1}\zeta^2 \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>
\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{1}{2}j_4^2 \biggl[ 1 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1}\biggr]
-
A_\ell\biggl[1 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} \biggr]
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \zeta^4
+ \biggl[ A_s \biggr]\zeta^2
- \frac{1}{2}\biggl[ A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \biggr] \zeta^4
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
Now, considering the following three relations &hellip;
<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
\frac{3}{2}(A_{ss}a_\ell^2)
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
(1-e^2)^{-1} - (A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \, ;
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
A_s
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
A_\ell + e^2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \, ;
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
e^2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2)
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
2 - 3 A_\ell \, ;
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
we can write,
<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>
\frac{1}{2}j_4^2 \biggl[ 1 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1}\biggr]
-
A_\ell\biggl[1 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} \biggr]
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \zeta^4
+ \biggl[ A_\ell + e^2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \biggr]\zeta^2
- \frac{1}{3}\biggl[ (1-e^2)^{-1} - (A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2)\biggr] \zeta^4
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\Rightarrow ~~~
3j_4^2 \biggl[ 1 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1}\biggr]
-
3A_\ell\biggl[2 - 2\zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} \biggr]
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
3(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \zeta^4
+ 6\biggl[ A_\ell + e^2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \biggr]\zeta^2
- 2\biggl[ (1-e^2)^{-1} - (A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2)\biggr] \zeta^4
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2)\biggl\{2\zeta^4 + 3\zeta^4(1-e^2)^{-1} + 6 e^2\zeta^2 \biggr\}
- 2\zeta^4 (1-e^2)^{-1} + 6A_\ell \zeta^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- 2\zeta^4 (1-e^2)^{-1} + 6A_\ell \zeta^2
+
\biggl[2 - 3A_\ell  \biggr]\biggl\{2\zeta^4 + 3\zeta^4(1-e^2)^{-1} + 6 e^2\zeta^2 \biggr\}\frac{1}{e^2}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- 2\zeta^4 (1-e^2)^{-1} 
- 3A_\ell\biggl\{2\zeta^4 + 3\zeta^4(1-e^2)^{-1} + 4 e^2\zeta^2 \biggr\}\frac{1}{e^2}
+
\biggl\{4\zeta^4 + 6\zeta^4(1-e^2)^{-1} + 12 e^2\zeta^2 \biggr\}\frac{1}{e^2}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\Rightarrow ~~~
3j_4^2 \biggl[ 1 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1}\biggr]
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- 2\zeta^4 (1-e^2)^{-1}
+ \frac{3A_\ell(1-e^2)^{-1}}{e^2}\biggl\{
\biggl[2e^2(1-e^2) - 2e^2\zeta^2 \biggr]
- \biggl[2\zeta^4(1-e^2) + 3\zeta^4 + 4 e^2(1-e^2)\zeta^2 \biggr]
\biggr\}
+
\biggl\{4\zeta^4 + 6\zeta^4(1-e^2)^{-1} + 12 e^2\zeta^2 \biggr\}\frac{1}{e^2}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
===10<sup>th</sup> Try===
===10<sup>th</sup> Try===



Revision as of 20:08, 7 November 2024

Parabolic Density Distribution


Part I:   Gravitational Potential

 


Part II:   Spherical Structures

 


Part III:   Axisymmetric Equilibrium Structures

 Old: 1st thru 7th tries
 Old: 8th thru 10th tries


Part IV:   Triaxial Equilibrium Structures (Exploration)

 

Axisymmetric (Oblate) Equilibrium Structures

Tentative Summary

Known Relations

Density:

ρ(ϖ,z)ρc

=

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1],

Gravitational Potential:

Φgrav(ϖ,z)(−πGρcaℓ2)

=

12IBT−Aℓχ2−Asζ2+12[(Assaℓ2)ζ4+2(Aℓsaℓ2)χ2ζ2+(Aℓℓaℓ2)χ4].

Vertical Pressure Gradient: [1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ =

ρρc⋅[2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

where, χ≡ϖ/aℓ and ζ≡z/aℓ, and the relevant index symbol expressions are:

IBT =

2Aℓ+As(1−e2)=2(1−e2)1/2[sin−1ee];

Aℓ

=

1e2[sin−1ee−(1−e2)1/2](1−e2)1/2;

As =

2e2[(1−e2)−1/2−sin−1ee](1−e2)1/2;

aℓ2Aℓℓ

=

14e4{−(3+2e2)(1−e2)+3(1−e2)1/2[sin−1ee]};

32aℓ2Ass

=

(4e2−3)e4(1−e2)+3(1−e2)1/2e4[sin−1ee];

aℓ2Aℓs

=

1e4{(3−e2)−3(1−e2)1/2[sin−1ee]},

where the eccentricity,

e≡[1−(asaℓ)2]1/2.

Drawing from our separate "6th Try" discussion — and as has been highlighted here for example — for the axisymmetric configurations under consideration, the e^z and e^ϖ components of the Euler equation become, respectively,

e^z:    

0

=

[1ρ∂P∂z+∂Φ∂z]

e^ϖ:    

j2ϖ3

=

[1ρ∂P∂ϖ+∂Φ∂ϖ]

Multiplying through by length (aℓ) and dividing through by the square of the velocity (πGρcaℓ2), we have,

e^z:    

0

=

[1ρ∂P∂z+∂Φ∂z]aℓ(πGρcaℓ2)

 

 

=

ρcρ⋅∂∂ζ[P(πGρc2aℓ2)]−∂∂ζ[Φ(−πGρcaℓ2)]

e^ϖ:    

j2ϖ3⋅aℓ(πGρcaℓ2)

=

[1ρ∂P∂ϖ+∂Φ∂ϖ]aℓ(πGρcaℓ2)

 

⇒1χ3⋅j2(πGρcaℓ4)

=

ρcρ⋅∂∂χ[P(πGρc2aℓ2)]−∂∂χ[Φ(−πGρcaℓ2)]

9th Try

Starting Key Relations

Density:

ρ(ϖ,z)ρc

=

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1],

Gravitational Potential:

Φgrav(ϖ,z)(−πGρcaℓ2)

=

12IBT−Aℓχ2−Asζ2+12[(Assaℓ2)ζ4+2(Aℓsaℓ2)χ2ζ2+(Aℓℓaℓ2)χ4].

Vertical Pressure Gradient: [1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ =

ρρc⋅[2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

Play With Vertical Pressure Gradient

[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ =

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1][2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

  =

[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)ζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]−χ2[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)ζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]−ζ2(1−e2)−1[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)ζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

  =

(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)ζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3−(2Aℓsaℓ2χ4−2Asχ2)ζ−2Assaℓ2χ2ζ3−(1−e2)−1[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)ζ3+2Assaℓ2ζ5]

  =

[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)−(2Aℓsaℓ2χ4−2Asχ2)]ζ+[2Assaℓ2−2Assaℓ2χ2−(1−e2)−1(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)]ζ3+[−(1−e2)−12Assaℓ2]ζ5.

Integrate over ζ gives …

[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∫[∂P∂ζ]dζ =

[(Aℓsaℓ2χ2−As)−(Aℓsaℓ2χ4−Asχ2)]ζ2+12[Assaℓ2−Assaℓ2χ2−(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2χ2−As)]ζ4+13[−(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2]ζ6+const

  =

[−Asζ2+12Assaℓ2ζ4+12(1−e2)−1Asζ4−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ6]χ0+[Aℓsaℓ2ζ2+Asζ2−12Assaℓ2ζ4−12(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)]χ2+[−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2]χ4+const.

Now Play With Radial Pressure Gradient

[1(−πGρcaℓ2)]∂Φ∂χ =

ρρc⋅{−2Aℓχ+12[4(Aℓsaℓ2)ζ2χ+4(Aℓℓaℓ2)χ3]}

  =

2[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1][(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)χ+Aℓℓaℓ2χ3]

  =

2[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)χ+Aℓℓaℓ2χ3]−2χ2[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)χ+Aℓℓaℓ2χ3]−2ζ2(1−e2)−1[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)χ+Aℓℓaℓ2χ3]

  =

2(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)χ+2[Aℓℓaℓ2+(Aℓ−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2)]χ3−2Aℓℓaℓ2χ5+2(1−e2)−1[(Aℓζ2−Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)χ−Aℓℓaℓ2ζ2χ3]

  =

2[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)+(1−e2)−1(Aℓζ2−Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)]χ+2[Aℓℓaℓ2+(Aℓ−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2)−(1−e2)−1Aℓℓaℓ2ζ2]χ3−2Aℓℓaℓ2χ5

10th Try

Repeating Key Relations

Density:

ρ(ϖ,z)ρc

=

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1],

Gravitational Potential:

Φgrav(ϖ,z)(−πGρcaℓ2)

=

12IBT−Aℓχ2−Asζ2+12[(Assaℓ2)ζ4+2(Aℓsaℓ2)χ2ζ2+(Aℓℓaℓ2)χ4].

Vertical Pressure Gradient: [1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ =

ρρc⋅[2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

From the above (9th Try) examination of the vertical pressure gradient, we determined that a reasonably good approximation for the normalized pressure throughout the configuration is given by the expression,

[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∫[∂P∂ζ]dζ =

[−Asζ2+12Assaℓ2ζ4+12(1−e2)−1Asζ4−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ6]χ0+[Aℓsaℓ2ζ2+Asζ2−12Assaℓ2ζ4−12(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)]χ2+[−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2]χ4+const.

If we set χ=0 — that is, if we look along the vertical axis — this approximation should be particularly good, resulting in the expression,

Pz≡{[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∫[∂P∂ζ]dζ}χ=0 =

Pc*−Asζ2+12Assaℓ2ζ4+12(1−e2)−1Asζ4−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ6.

Note that in the limit that z→as — that is, at the pole along the vertical (symmetry) axis where the Pz should drop to zero — we should set ζ→(1−e2)1/2. This allows us to determine the central pressure.

Pc* =

As(1−e2)−12Assaℓ2(1−e2)2−12(1−e2)−1As(1−e2)2+13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2(1−e2)3

  =

As(1−e2)−12As(1−e2)+13Assaℓ2(1−e2)2−12Assaℓ2(1−e2)2

  =

12As(1−e2)−16Assaℓ2(1−e2)2.

This means that, along the vertical axis, the pressure gradient is,

Pz≡{[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∫[∂P∂ζ]dζ}χ=0 =

Pc*−Asζ2+12Assaℓ2ζ4+12(1−e2)−1Asζ4−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ6.

∂Pz∂ζ =

−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3+2(1−e2)−1Asζ3−2(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ5.

This should match the more general "vertical pressure gradient" expression when we set, χ=0, that is,

{[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ}χ=0 =

[1−χ20−ζ2(1−e2)−1]⋅[2Aℓsaℓ2ζχ20−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

  =

[−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]+ζ2(1−e2)−1[2Asζ−2Assaℓ2ζ3]

Yes! The expressions match!

Shift to ξ1 Coordinate

In an accompanying chapter, we defined the coordinate,

(ξ1as)2 ≡

(ϖaℓ)2+(zas)2=χ2+ζ2(1−e2)−1.

Given that we want the pressure to be constant on ξ1 surfaces, it seems plausible that ζ2 should be replaced by (1−e2)(ξ1/as)2=[(1−e2)χ2+ζ2] in the expression for Pz. That is, we might expect the expression for the pressure at any point in the meridional plane to be,

Ptest01 =

Pc*−As[(1−e2)χ2+ζ2]1+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As][(1−e2)χ2+ζ2]2−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2[(1−e2)χ2+ζ2]3

  =

Pc*−As[(1−e2)χ2+ζ2]1+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As][(1−e2)2χ4+2(1−e2)χ2ζ2+ζ4]−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2[(1−e2)χ2+ζ2][(1−e2)2χ4+2(1−e2)χ2ζ2+ζ4]

  =

Pc*−As[(1−e2)χ2+ζ2]+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As][(1−e2)2χ4+2(1−e2)χ2ζ2+ζ4]

   

−13Assaℓ2[(1−e2)2χ6+2(1−e2)χ4ζ2+χ2ζ4]−13Assaℓ2[(1−e2)χ4ζ2+2χ2ζ4+(1−e2)−1ζ6]

  =

χ0{Pc*−Asζ2+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As]ζ4−13Assaℓ2(1−e2)−1ζ6}+χ2{−As(1−e2)+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As]2(1−e2)ζ2−13Assaℓ2ζ4−23Assaℓ2ζ4}

   

+χ4{12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As](1−e2)2−23Assaℓ2(1−e2)ζ2−13Assaℓ2(1−e2)ζ2}+χ6{−13Assaℓ2(1−e2)2}

  =

χ0{Pc*−Asζ2+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As]ζ4−13Assaℓ2(1−e2)−1ζ6}+χ2{−As(1−e2)+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As]2(1−e2)ζ2−Assaℓ2ζ4}

   

+χ4{12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As](1−e2)2−Assaℓ2(1−e2)ζ2}+χ6{−13Assaℓ2(1−e2)2}

  Integration over ζ Pressure Guess
χ0 −Asζ2+12Assaℓ2ζ4+12(1−e2)−1Asζ4−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ6

Pc*−Asζ2+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As]ζ4−13Assaℓ2(1−e2)−1ζ6

χ2

Aℓsaℓ2ζ2+Asζ2−12Assaℓ2ζ4−12(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)

−As(1−e2)+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As]2(1−e2)ζ2−Assaℓ2ζ4

χ4

−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2

12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As](1−e2)2−Assaℓ2(1−e2)ζ2

χ6

none

−13Assaℓ2(1−e2)2

Compare Vertical Pressure Gradient Expressions

From our above (9th try) derivation we know that the vertical pressure gradient is given by the expression,

[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ =

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1][2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

  =

[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)−(2Aℓsaℓ2χ4−2Asχ2)]ζ+[2Assaℓ2−2Assaℓ2χ2−(1−e2)−1(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)]ζ3+[−(1−e2)−12Assaℓ2]ζ5.

  =

[2As(χ2−1)+2Aℓsaℓ2(1−χ2)χ2]ζ+[2Assaℓ2(1−χ2)−2Aℓsaℓ2(1−e2)−1χ2+2(1−e2)−1As]ζ3+[−2Assaℓ2(1−e2)−1]ζ5.

By comparison, the vertical derivative of our "test01" pressure expression gives,

Ptest01 =

χ0{Pc*−Asζ2+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As]ζ4−13Assaℓ2(1−e2)−1ζ6}+χ2{−As(1−e2)+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As]2(1−e2)ζ2−Assaℓ2ζ4}

   

+χ4{12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As](1−e2)2−Assaℓ2(1−e2)ζ2}+χ6{−13Assaℓ2(1−e2)2}

⇒∂Ptest01∂ζ =

χ0{−2Asζ+2[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As]ζ3−2Assaℓ2(1−e2)−1ζ5}+χ2{2[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As](1−e2)ζ−4Assaℓ2ζ3}+χ4{−2Assaℓ2(1−e2)ζ}

  =

ζ1{−2As+2[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As](1−e2)χ2−2Assaℓ2(1−e2)χ4}+ζ3{2[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As]−4Assaℓ2χ2}+ζ5{−2Assaℓ2(1−e2)−1}

  =

ζ1{2As(χ2−1)+2Assaℓ2(1−e2)χ2(1−χ2)}+ζ3{2Assaℓ2(1−2χ2)+2(1−e2)−1As}+ζ5{−2Assaℓ2(1−e2)−1}

Instead, try …

Ptest02Pc =

p2(ρρc)2+p3(ρρc)3

⇒∂∂ζ[Ptest02Pc] =

2p2(ρρc)∂∂ζ[ρρc]+3p3(ρρc)2∂∂ζ[ρρc]

  =

(ρρc){2p2+3p3(ρρc)}∂∂ζ[ρρc]

  =

(ρρc){2p2+3p3[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1]}∂∂ζ[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1]

  =

(ρρc){(2p2+3p3)−3p3χ2−3p3ζ2(1−e2)−1}[−2ζ(1−e2)−1]

  =

(ρρc)(1−e2)−2{6p3χ2ζ(1−e2)−2(2p2+3p3)(1−e2)ζ+6p3ζ3}

Compare the term inside the curly braces with the term, from the beginning of this subsection, inside the square brackets, namely,

2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3 =

2e4[(3−e2)−Υ]χ2ζ−[4e2(1−13Υ)]ζ+43e4[4e2−3(1−e2)+Υ]ζ3

  =

13e4(1−e2){6[(3−e2)−Υ](1−e2)χ2ζ−[12e2(1−13Υ)](1−e2)ζ+4[(4e2−3)+Υ]ζ3}.

Pretty Close!!

Alternatively:   according to the third term, we need to set,

6p3 =

4[(4e2−3)+Υ]

⇒Υ =

32p3+(3−4e2)

in which case, the first coefficient must be given by the expression,

[(3−e2)−Υ] =

(3−e2)−32p3+(4e2−3)]=[3e2−32p3].

And, from the second coefficient, we find,

2(2p2+3p3) =

[12e2(1−13Υ)]

⇒2p2 =

2e2(3−Υ)−3p3

 

=

−3p3+6e2−2e2[32p3+(3−4e2)]

 

=

−3p3+6e2−[3e2p3+6e2−8e4]

 

=

8e4−3p3(1+e2);

or,

p2

=

4e4−(1+e2)[(4e2−3)+Υ]

 

=

4e4−(1+e2)(4e2−3)−(1+e2)Υ

 

=

4e4−[4e2−3+4e4−3e2]−(1+e2)Υ

 

=

3−e2−(1+e2)Υ


SUMMARY:

Ptest02Pc =

p2(ρρc)2+p3(ρρc)3,

p2

=

3−e2−(1+e2)Υ=e4(Aℓsaℓ2)−e2Υ,

p3 =

23[(4e2−3)+Υ]=e4(Assaℓ2)+23e2Υ.


Note:   according to the first term, we need to set,

p3 =

[(3−e2)−Υ]

⇒Υ =

[(3−e2)−p3],

in which case, the third coefficient must be given by the expression,

4[(4e2−3)+Υ] =

4[(4e2−3)+(3−e2)−p3]=4[3e2−p3].

And, from the second coefficient, we find,

2(2p2+3p3) =

[12e2(1−13Υ)]

⇒2p2 =

2e2(3−Υ)−3p3

 

=

2e2[3−[(3−e2)−p3]]−3p3

 

=

2e2[e2+p3]−3p3

 

=

2e4+(2e2−3)p3;

or,

2p2

=

2e4+(2e2−3)[(3−e2)−Υ]

 

=

2e4+(2e2−3)(3−e2)−(2e2−3)Υ

 

=

2e4+(6e2−2e4−9+3e2)−(2e2−3)Υ

 

=

9(e2−1)−(2e2−3)Υ

Better yet, try …

Ptest03Pc =

p2(ρρc)2[1−β(1−ρρc)]=p2(ρρc)2[(1−β)+β(ρρc)]

⇒∂∂ζ[Ptest03Pc] =

⋯

where, in the case of a spherically symmetric parabolic-density configuration, β=1/2. Well … this wasn't a bad idea, but as it turns out, this "test03" expression is no different from the "test02" guess. Specifically, the "test03" expression can be rewritten as,

Ptest03Pc =

p2(1−β)(ρρc)2+p2β(ρρc)3,

which has the same form as the "test02" expression.

Test04

From above, we understand that, analytically,

[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ =

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1][2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

  =

[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)−(2Aℓsaℓ2χ4−2Asχ2)]ζ+[2Assaℓ2−2Assaℓ2χ2−(1−e2)−1(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)]ζ3+[−(1−e2)−12Assaℓ2]ζ5

  =

[2As(χ2−1)+2Aℓsaℓ2(1−χ2)χ2]ζ+[2Assaℓ2(1−χ2)−2Aℓsaℓ2(1−e2)−1χ2+2(1−e2)−1As]ζ3+[−2Assaℓ2(1−e2)−1]ζ5.

Also from above, we have shown that if,

Ptest02Pc =

p2(ρρc)2+p3(ρρc)3

SUMMARY from test02:

p2

=

3−e2−(1+e2)Υ=e4(Aℓsaℓ2)−e2Υ,

p3 =

23[(4e2−3)+Υ]=e4(Assaℓ2)+23e2Υ.

⇒∂∂ζ[Ptest02Pc] =

(ρρc)(1−e2)−2{6p3χ2ζ(1−e2)−2(2p2+3p3)(1−e2)ζ+6p3ζ3}

  =

(ρρc)(1−e2)−2{6[e4(Assaℓ2)+23e2Υ]χ2ζ(1−e2)−2[2e4(Aℓsaℓ2)+3e4(Assaℓ2)](1−e2)ζ+6[e4(Assaℓ2)+23e2Υ]ζ3}




Here (test04), we add a term that is linear in the normalized density, which means,

Ptest04Pc =

Ptest02Pc+p1(ρρc)

⇒∂∂ζ[Ptest04Pc] =

∂∂ζ[Ptest02Pc]+∂∂ζ[p1(ρρc)]=∂∂ζ[Ptest02Pc]+p1∂∂ζ[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1]

See Also

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |