|
|
| Line 295: |
Line 295: |
| </tr> | | </tr> |
| </table> | | </table> |
|
| |
| ===8<sup>th</sup> Try===
| |
|
| |
| ====Foundation====
| |
| <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="left"><font color="orange"><b>Density:</b></font></td>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>\rho^* \equiv \frac{\rho(\chi, \zeta)}{\rho_c}</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \biggl[1 - \chi^2 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} \biggr]
| |
| \, ,</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="left"><font color="orange"><b>Gravitational Potential:</b></font></td>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>\frac{ \Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\chi,\zeta)}{(-\pi G\rho_c a_\ell^2)} </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{1}{2} I_\mathrm{BT}
| |
| - A_\ell \chi^2 - A_s \zeta^2
| |
| + \frac{1}{2}\biggl[(A_{s s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^4
| |
| + 2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )\chi^2 \zeta^2
| |
| + (A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2) \chi^4 \biggr]
| |
| \, .
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
|
| |
| ====Complete the Square====
| |
|
| |
| Again, let's rewrite the term inside square brackets on the RHS of the expression for the gravitational potential,
| |
|
| |
| <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>\biggl[ ~~ \biggr]_\mathrm{RHS}</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>\equiv</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \biggl[(A_{s s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^4
| |
| + 2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )\chi^2 \zeta^2
| |
| + (A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2) \chi^4 \biggr]\, ,
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
| in such a way that we effectively "complete the square." Assuming that the desired expression takes the form,
| |
|
| |
| <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>\biggl[ ~~ \biggr]_\mathrm{RHS}</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \biggl[(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)^{1 / 2} \zeta^2 + B\chi^2 \biggr]
| |
| \biggl[(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)^{1 / 2} \zeta^2 + C\chi^2 \biggr]
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
|
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| (A_{s s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^4
| |
| + (A_{s s} a_\ell^2)^{1 / 2} (B+C) \zeta^2\chi^2
| |
| + BC\chi^4 \, ,
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
| we see that we must have,
| |
|
| |
| <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)^{1 / 2} (B+C) </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| 2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>\Rightarrow ~~~ B </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)^{1 / 2} } - C \, ;
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
| and we must also have,
| |
|
| |
| <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>BC </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| (A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2)
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>\Rightarrow ~~~ B </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{(A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2)}{C} \, .
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
| Hence,
| |
|
| |
| <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>\frac{(A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2)}{C} </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)^{1 / 2} } - C
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>\Rightarrow ~~~ 0</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| C^2 - 2\biggl[ \frac{(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)^{1 / 2} }\biggr]C + (A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2) \, .
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
| The pair of roots of this quadratic expression are,
| |
|
| |
| <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>C_\pm</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \biggl[ \frac{(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)^{1 / 2} }\biggr]
| |
| \pm \frac{1}{2}\biggl\{
| |
| 4\biggl[ \frac{(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )^2}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2) }\biggr]
| |
| - 4(A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2)
| |
| \biggr\}^{1 / 2}
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
|
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)^{1 / 2} }\biggl\{1
| |
| \pm \biggl[
| |
| 1
| |
| - \frac{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)(A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2) }{(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )^2}
| |
| \biggr]^{1 / 2} \biggr\}
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{C_\pm}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)^{1 / 2}}</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2) }\biggl\{1
| |
| \pm \biggl[
| |
| 1
| |
| - \frac{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)(A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2) }{(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )^2}
| |
| \biggr]^{1 / 2} \biggr\} \, .
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
| Also, then,
| |
|
| |
| <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>\frac{B_\pm}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)^{1 / 2}}</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2) }
| |
| -
| |
| \frac{C_\pm}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)^{1 / 2}}
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
|
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2) }
| |
| -
| |
| \frac{(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2) }\biggl\{1
| |
| \pm \biggl[
| |
| 1
| |
| - \frac{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)(A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2) }{(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )^2}
| |
| \biggr]^{1 / 2} \biggr\}
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
|
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2) }\biggl\{1
| |
| \mp \biggl[
| |
| 1
| |
| - \frac{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)(A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2) }{(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )^2}
| |
| \biggr]^{1 / 2} \biggr\} \, .
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
|
| |
| <table border="1" width="80%" cellpadding="8" align="center"><tr><td align="left">
| |
| NOTE: [[#Index_Symbol_Expressions|Given that]],
| |
| <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{2}{3(1-e^2)} - \frac{2}{3}(A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2)
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
|
| |
| <td align="center"> and, </td>
| |
|
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>(A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2)</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{4}(A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2)
| |
| \, ,
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
| we can write,
| |
| [[File:LambdaVsEccentricity.png|250px|right|Lambda vs Eccentricity]]<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>\Lambda \equiv \frac{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)(A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2) }{(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )^2}</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{1 }{(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )^2} \biggl\{
| |
| \biggl[\frac{2}{3(1-e^2)} - \frac{2}{3}(A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2)\biggr]
| |
| \biggl[ \frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{4}(A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2) \biggr]
| |
| \biggr\}
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
|
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{1 }{6(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )^2} \biggl\{
| |
| \frac{1}{(1-e^2)}
| |
| \biggl[ 2 - (A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2) \biggr]
| |
| -
| |
| (A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2)
| |
| \biggl[ 2 - (A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2) \biggr]
| |
| \biggr\}
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
|
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{1 }{6(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )^2} \biggl\{
| |
| \biggl[\frac{1}{(1-e^2)} - (A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2)\biggr]
| |
| \biggl[ 2 - (A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2) \biggr]
| |
| \biggr\}
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
|
| |
| </td></tr></table>
| |
|
| |
| In summary, then, we can write,
| |
|
| |
| <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>\frac{B_\pm}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)^{1 / 2}}</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2) }\biggl[
| |
| 1 \mp ( 1 - \Lambda )^{1 / 2}
| |
| \biggr]
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
|
| |
| <td align="center"> and, </td>
| |
|
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>\frac{C_\pm}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)^{1 / 2}}</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2) }\biggl[
| |
| 1 \pm (1 - \Lambda )^{1 / 2}
| |
| \biggr]
| |
| \, ,
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
| where, as illustrated by the inset "Lambda vs Eccentricity" plot, for all values of the eccentricity <math>(0 < e \leq 1)</math>, the quantity, <math>\Lambda</math>, is greater than unity. It is clear, then, that both roots of the relevant quadratic equation are complex — i.e., they have imaginary components. But that's okay because the coefficients that appear in the right-hand-side, bracketed quartic expression appear in the combinations,
| |
|
| |
| <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>(BC)_\pm</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )^2}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2) }
| |
| \biggl[ 1 - ( 1 - \Lambda )^{1 / 2} \biggr]
| |
| \biggl[ 1 + ( 1 - \Lambda )^{1 / 2} \biggr]
| |
| =
| |
| \frac{(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )^2}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2) }
| |
| \biggl[ \Lambda\biggr]
| |
| =
| |
| (A_{\ell \ell}a_\ell^2 )
| |
| \, ,
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>(B + C)_\pm</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center">
| |
| <math>=</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)^{1 / 2} }\biggl[
| |
| 1 \mp ( 1 - \Lambda )^{1 / 2}
| |
| \biggr]
| |
| +
| |
| \frac{(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)^{1 / 2} }\biggl[
| |
| 1 \pm (1 - \Lambda )^{1 / 2}
| |
| \biggr]
| |
| =
| |
| \frac{2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )}{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2)^{1 / 2} }
| |
| \, ,
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
| both of which are real.
| |
|
| |
|
| ===9<sup>th</sup> Try=== | | ===9<sup>th</sup> Try=== |
Parabolic Density Distribution
Axisymmetric (Oblate) Equilibrium Structures
Tentative Summary
Known Relations
| Density: |
|
|
|
| Gravitational Potential: |
|
|
|
| Vertical Pressure Gradient: |
|
|
|
where, and , and the relevant index symbol expressions are:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where the eccentricity,
Drawing from our separate "6th Try" discussion — and as has been highlighted here for example — for the axisymmetric configurations under consideration, the and components of the Euler equation become, respectively,
| : |
|
=
|
|
| : |
|
=
|
|
|
Multiplying through by length and dividing through by the square of the velocity , we have,
| : |
|
=
|
|
| |
|
=
|
|
| : |
|
=
|
|
| |
|
=
|
|
9th Try
Starting Key Relations
| Density: |
|
|
|
| Gravitational Potential: |
|
|
|
| Vertical Pressure Gradient: |
|
|
|
Play With Vertical Pressure Gradient
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Integrate over gives …
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Now Play With Radial Pressure Gradient
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Add a term to account for centrifugal acceleration …
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Integrate over gives …
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Compare Pair of Integrations
| |
Integration over |
Integration over |
|
|
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none
|
|
Try, and .
| |
Integration over |
Integration over |
|
|
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none
|
|
What expression for is required in order to ensure that the term is the same in both columns?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Now, considering the following three relations …
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we can write,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10th Try
Repeating Key Relations
| Density: |
|
|
|
| Gravitational Potential: |
|
|
|
| Vertical Pressure Gradient: |
|
|
|
From the above (9th Try) examination of the vertical pressure gradient, we determined that a reasonably good approximation for the normalized pressure throughout the configuration is given by the expression,
|
|
|
If we set — that is, if we look along the vertical axis — this approximation should be particularly good, resulting in the expression,
|
|
|
|
Note that in the limit that — that is, at the pole along the vertical (symmetry) axis where the should drop to zero — we should set . This allows us to determine the central pressure.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
This means that, along the vertical axis, the pressure gradient is,
|
|
|
|
|
|
This should match the more general "vertical pressure gradient" expression when we set, , that is,
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Yes! The expressions match!
Shift to ξ1 Coordinate
In an accompanying chapter, we defined the coordinate,
|
|
|
Given that we want the pressure to be constant on surfaces, it seems plausible that should be replaced by in the expression for . That is, we might expect the expression for the pressure at any point in the meridional plane to be,
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Integration over |
Pressure Guess |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none
|
|
Compare Vertical Pressure Gradient Expressions
From our above (9th try) derivation we know that the vertical pressure gradient is given by the expression,
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
By comparison, the vertical derivative of our "test01" pressure expression gives,
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Instead, try …
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Compare the term inside the curly braces with the term, from the beginning of this subsection, inside the square brackets, namely,
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Pretty Close!!
|
Alternatively: according to the third term, we need to set,
|
|
|
|
|
|
in which case, the first coefficient must be given by the expression,
|
|
|
And, from the second coefficient, we find,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: according to the first term, we need to set,
|
|
|
|
|
|
in which case, the third coefficient must be given by the expression,
|
|
|
And, from the second coefficient, we find,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Better yet, try …
|
|
|
|
|
|
where, in the case of a spherically symmetric parabolic-density configuration, . Well … this wasn't a bad idea, but as it turns out, this "test03" expression is no different from the "test02" guess. Specifically, the "test03" expression can be rewritten as,
|
|
|
which has the same form as the "test02" expression.
Test04
From above, we understand that, analytically,
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Also from above, we have shown that if,
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY from test02:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Here (test04), we add a term that is linear in the normalized density, which means,
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Also