ParabolicDensity/Axisymmetric/Structure: Difference between revisions

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 292: Line 292:
- \frac{\partial }{\partial \chi}\biggl[ \frac{\Phi}{(-~\pi G\rho_c a_\ell^2)} \biggr]
- \frac{\partial }{\partial \chi}\biggl[ \frac{\Phi}{(-~\pi G\rho_c a_\ell^2)} \biggr]
</math>  
</math>  
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
===7<sup>th</sup> Try===
====Introduction====
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="left"><font color="orange"><b>Density:</b></font></td>
  <td align="right">
<math>\frac{\rho(\chi, \zeta)}{\rho_c}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl[1 - \chi^2 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} \biggr]
\, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="left"><font color="orange"><b>Gravitational Potential:</b></font></td>
  <td align="right">
<math>\frac{ \Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\chi,\zeta)}{(-\pi G\rho_c a_\ell^2)} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2} I_\mathrm{BT} 
- A_\ell \chi^2  - A_s \zeta^2 
+ \frac{1}{2}\biggl[(A_{s s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^4
+ 2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )\chi^2 \zeta^2
+ (A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2)  \chi^4 \biggr]
\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="left"><font color="purple"><b>Specific Angular Momentum:</b></font></td>
  <td align="right">
<math>
\frac{j^2 }{(\pi G \rho_c a_\ell^4)} \cdot \frac{1}{\chi^3}
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
2j_1 \chi  - 2 j_3 \chi^3
\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="left"><font color="purple"><b>Centrifugal Potential:</b></font></td>
  <td align="right">
<math>
\frac{\Psi }{(\pi G \rho_c a_\ell^2)}
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2}\biggl[j_3 \chi^4  -2j_1 \chi^2  \biggr]\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
<table border="1" align="center" width="80%" cellpadding="8"><tr><td align="left">
[[#Index_Symbol_Expressions|From above]], we recall the following relations:
<table align="center" border=0 cellpadding="3">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
4e^4(A_{\ell \ell}a_\ell^2 )
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>
=
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- (3 + 2e^2) (1-e^2) + \Upsilon
\, ;
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\frac{3}{2} e^4(A_{ss}a_\ell^2 ) </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{( 4e^2 - 3 )}{(1-e^2)}
+
\Upsilon
\, ;
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
e^4(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>
=
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
(3-e^2)
-
\Upsilon
\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
where,
<table align="center" border=0 cellpadding="3">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
\Upsilon
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>
\equiv
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
3 (1 - e^2)^{1 / 2} \biggl[\frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e}\biggr]
\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
<font color="red">Crosscheck</font> &hellip; Given that,
<table align="center" border=0 cellpadding="3">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
\Upsilon
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>
=
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
(3-e^2) - e^4(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )
\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
we obtain the pair of relations,
<table align="center" border=0 cellpadding="3">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
4e^4(A_{\ell \ell}a_\ell^2 )
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>
=
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- (3 + 2e^2) (1-e^2) + (3-e^2) - e^4(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>
=
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- (3-3e^2 + 2e^2 - 2e^4)
+ (3-e^2) - e^4(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>
=
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
2e^4  - e^4(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
\Rightarrow ~~~ (A_{\ell \ell}a_\ell^2 )
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>
=
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2}  - \frac{1}{4}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )
\, ;
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\frac{3}{2} e^4(A_{ss}a_\ell^2 ) </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{( 4e^2 - 3 )}{(1-e^2)}
+
(3-e^2) - e^4(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{( 4e^2 - 3 )+(3-e^2)(1-e^2)}{(1-e^2)}
- e^4(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{e^4}{(1-e^2)}
- e^4(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~ (A_{ss}a_\ell^2 ) </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{2}{3}\biggl[ \frac{1}{(1-e^2)} - (A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )\biggr]
\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</td></tr></table>
====RHS Square Brackets (TERM1)====
Let's rewrite the term inside square brackets on the RHS of the expression for the gravitational potential.
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\biggl[ ~~ \biggr]_\mathrm{RHS}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl[(A_{s s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^4
+ 2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )\chi^2 \zeta^2
+ (A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2)  \chi^4 \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
e^{-4} \biggl\{
\frac{2}{3}\biggl[ \frac{( 4e^2 - 3 )}{(1-e^2)} + \Upsilon\biggr] \zeta^4
+ 2\biggl[ (3-e^2) - \Upsilon \biggr]\chi^2 \zeta^2
+ \frac{1}{4}\biggl[ - (3 + 2e^2) (1-e^2) + \Upsilon \biggr]  \chi^4
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
e^{-4} \biggl\{
\frac{2}{3}\biggl[ \frac{( 4e^2 - 3 )}{(1-e^2)} \biggr] \zeta^4
+ 2\biggl[ (3-e^2) \biggr]\chi^2 \zeta^2
+ \frac{1}{4}\biggl[ - (3 + 2e^2) (1-e^2) \biggr]  \chi^4
+
\frac{2}{3}\biggl[ \zeta^4 -3\zeta^2\chi^2 + \frac{3}{8}\chi^4  \biggr]\Upsilon
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- ~e^{-4} \biggl\{
\frac{2}{3}\biggl[ \frac{( 3-4e^2 )}{(1-e^2)} \biggr] \zeta^4
- 2\biggl[ (3-e^2) \biggr]\chi^2 \zeta^2
+ \frac{1}{4}\biggl[ (3 + 2e^2) (1-e^2) \biggr]  \chi^4
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
+~
e^{-4}\biggl\{ \frac{2}{3}\biggl[ (\zeta^2 - \chi^2)(\zeta^2-2\chi^2) - \frac{13}{8}\chi^4  \biggr]\Upsilon
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- ~e^{-4} \frac{2}{3(1-e^2)}\biggl\{
\biggl[ ( 3-4e^2 ) \biggr] \zeta^4
- 3\biggl[ (3-e^2) \biggr](1-e^2)\chi^2 \zeta^2
+ \frac{3}{8}\biggl[ (3 + 2e^2) \biggr]  (1-e^2)^2 \chi^4
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
+~
e^{-4}\biggl\{ \frac{2}{3}\biggl[ (\zeta^2 - \chi^2)(\zeta^2-2\chi^2) - \frac{13}{8}\chi^4  \biggr]\Upsilon
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- ~ \frac{2e^{-4}}{(1-e^2)}\biggl\{
\zeta^4
- 3 (1-e^2)\chi^2 \zeta^2
+ \frac{3}{8} (1-e^2)^2 \chi^4
\biggr\}
+ ~ \frac{8e^{-2}}{3(1-e^2)}\biggl\{
\zeta^4
- \frac{3}{4} (1-e^2)\chi^2 \zeta^2
- \frac{3}{16} (1-e^2)^2 \chi^4
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
+~
\frac{2e^{-4}}{3}\biggl[ (\zeta^2 - \chi^2)(\zeta^2-2\chi^2) - \frac{13}{8}\chi^4  \biggr]\Upsilon
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- ~ \frac{2e^{-4}}{(1-e^2)}\biggl\{ \underbrace{
\biggl[\zeta^2 - (1-e^2)\chi^2\biggr]\biggl[ \zeta^2 - 2(1-e^2)\chi^2\biggr]
- \frac{13}{8}(1-e^2)^2\chi^4}_{-0.038855}
\biggr\}
+ ~ \frac{8e^{-2}}{3(1-e^2)}\biggl\{ \overbrace{
\biggl[\zeta^2 - (1-e^2)\chi^2\biggr]\biggl[ \zeta^2 + \frac{1}{4}(1-e^2)\chi^2\biggr]
+ \frac{1}{16}(1-e^2)^2\chi^4}^{-0.010124}
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
+~
\frac{2e^{-4}}{3}\biggl[\underbrace{ (\zeta^2 - \chi^2)(\zeta^2-2\chi^2) - \frac{13}{8}\chi^4 }_{-0.061608} \biggr]\Upsilon
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
0.212119014
</math>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; ([[#Example_Evaluation|example #1]], below) .
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
Check #1:
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
(\zeta^2 - \chi^2)(\zeta^2-2\chi^2) - \frac{13}{8}\chi^4 
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\zeta^4 -3\chi^2\zeta^2 +2\chi^4 - \frac{13}{8}\chi^4
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\zeta^4 -3\chi^2\zeta^2 + \frac{3}{8}\chi^4 \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
Check #2:
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
(\zeta^2 - \chi^2)(\zeta^2 + \frac{1}{4}\chi^2) + \frac{1}{16}\chi^4 
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\zeta^4 - \frac{3}{4}\chi^2\zeta^2 - \frac{1}{4}\chi^4 + \frac{1}{16}\chi^4
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\zeta^4 - \frac{3}{4}\chi^2\zeta^2 - \frac{3}{16}\chi^4
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
====RHS Quadratic Terms (TERM2)====
The quadratic terms on the RHS can be rewritten as,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>A_\ell \chi^2 + A_s \zeta^2</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl\{ \frac{1}{e^2} \biggl[  \frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e} - (1-e^2)^{1/2} \biggr] (1-e^2)^{1/2} \biggl\}\chi^2
+
\biggr\{ \frac{2}{e^2} \biggl[  (1-e^2)^{-1/2} - \frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e} \biggr] (1-e^2)^{1 / 2} \biggr\}\zeta^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl\{ \frac{1}{e^2} \biggl[  (1-e^2)^{1/2}\frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e} - (1-e^2) \biggr]  \biggl\}\chi^2
+
\biggr\{ \frac{2}{e^2} \biggl[  1 - (1-e^2)^{1 / 2} \frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e} \biggr] \biggr\}\zeta^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl\{ \frac{1}{3e^2} \biggl[  \Upsilon - 3(1-e^2) \biggr]  \biggl\}\chi^2
+
\biggr\{ \frac{2}{3e^2} \biggl[  3 - \Upsilon \biggr] \biggr\}\zeta^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{(\Upsilon - 3)}{3e^2} \biggl[ \chi^2 - 2\zeta^2 \biggr]
+ \chi^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{(\Upsilon - 3)}{3e^2} (\chi + \sqrt{2}\zeta)(\chi - \sqrt{2} \zeta)
+ \chi^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\mathrm{TERM2}</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
0.401150 ~~~
</math>
([[#Example_Evaluation|example #1]], below) .
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
where, again,
<table align="center" border=0 cellpadding="3">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
\Upsilon
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>
\equiv
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
3 (1 - e^2)^{1 / 2} \biggl[\frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e}\biggr] = 2.040835
\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
====Gravitational Potential Rewritten====
In summary, then,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\frac{ \Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\chi,\zeta)}{(-\pi G\rho_c a_\ell^2)} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2} I_\mathrm{BT} 
- A_\ell \chi^2  - A_s \zeta^2 
+ \frac{1}{2}\biggl[(A_{s s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^4
+ 2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )\chi^2 \zeta^2
+ (A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2)  \chi^4 \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{3} \Upsilon
-
\frac{(\Upsilon - 3)}{3e^2} (\chi + \sqrt{2}\zeta)(\chi - \sqrt{2} \zeta)
- \chi^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- ~ \frac{e^{-4}}{(1-e^2)}\biggl\{
\biggl[\zeta^2 - (1-e^2)\chi^2\biggr]\biggl[ \zeta^2 - 2(1-e^2)\chi^2\biggr]
- \frac{13}{8}(1-e^2)^2\chi^4
\biggr\}
+ ~ \frac{4e^{-2}}{3(1-e^2)}\biggl\{
\biggl[\zeta^2 - (1-e^2)\chi^2\biggr]\biggl[ \zeta^2 + \frac{1}{4}(1-e^2)\chi^2\biggr]
+ \frac{1}{16}(1-e^2)^2\chi^4
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
+~
\frac{e^{-4}}{3}\biggl[ (\zeta^2 - \chi^2)(\zeta^2-2\chi^2) - \frac{13}{8}\chi^4  \biggr]\Upsilon
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{3} \Upsilon
-
\frac{(\Upsilon - 3)}{3e^2} (\chi + \sqrt{2}\zeta)(\chi - \sqrt{2} \zeta)
- \chi^2
+ ~ \frac{4}{3e^{2}(1-e^2)}\biggl\{
\biggl[\zeta^2 - (1-e^2)\chi^2\biggr]\biggl[ \zeta^2 + \frac{1}{4}(1-e^2)\chi^2\biggr]
+ \frac{1}{16}(1-e^2)^2\chi^4
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- ~ \frac{1}{e^4(1-e^2)}\biggl\{
\biggl[\zeta^2 - (1-e^2)\chi^2\biggr]\biggl[ \zeta^2 - 2(1-e^2)\chi^2\biggr]
- \frac{13}{8}(1-e^2)^2\chi^4
\biggr\}
+~
\frac{1}{3e^4}\biggl[ (\zeta^2 - \chi^2)(\zeta^2-2\chi^2) - \frac{13}{8}\chi^4  \biggr]\Upsilon
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{3} \Upsilon
-
\frac{(\Upsilon - 3)}{3e^2} (\chi + \sqrt{2}\zeta)(\chi - \sqrt{2} \zeta)
+ ~ \frac{4}{3e^{2}(1-e^2)}\biggl\{
\biggl[\zeta^2 - (1-e^2)\chi^2\biggr]\biggl[ \zeta^2 + \frac{1}{4}(1-e^2)\chi^2\biggr]
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- ~ \frac{1}{e^4(1-e^2)}\biggl\{
\biggl[\zeta^2 - (1-e^2)\chi^2\biggr]\biggl[ \zeta^2 - 2(1-e^2)\chi^2\biggr]
\biggr\}
+~
\frac{\Upsilon}{3e^4}\biggl[ (\zeta^2 - \chi^2)(\zeta^2-2\chi^2)  \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- \chi^2
+ ~ \frac{4}{3e^{2}(1-e^2)}\biggl\{ \frac{1}{16}(1-e^2)^2\chi^4 \biggr\}
+ \frac{1}{e^4(1-e^2)}\biggl\{ \frac{13}{8}(1-e^2)^2\chi^4  \biggr\}
- \frac{\Upsilon}{3e^4}\biggl\{ \frac{13}{8}\chi^4 \biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{3} \Upsilon
-
\frac{(\Upsilon - 3)}{3e^2} (\chi + \sqrt{2}\zeta)(\chi - \sqrt{2} \zeta)
+ ~ \frac{4(1-e^2)}{3e^{2}}\biggl\{
\biggl[(1-e^2)^{-1}\zeta^2 - \chi^2\biggr]\biggl[(1-e^2)^{-1} \zeta^2 + \frac{1}{4}\chi^2\biggr]
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- ~ \frac{(1-e^2)}{e^4}\biggl\{
\biggl[(1-e^2)^{-1}\zeta^2 - \chi^2\biggr]\biggl[ (1-e^2)^{-1}\zeta^2 - 2\chi^2\biggr]
\biggr\}
+~
\frac{\Upsilon}{3e^4}\biggl[ (\zeta^2 - \chi^2)(\zeta^2-2\chi^2)  \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- ~\chi^2
+ ~ \biggl\{
\frac{(1-e^2)}{12e^{2}}
+ \frac{13(1-e^2)}{8e^4}
- \frac{13\Upsilon}{24e^4} \biggr\}\chi^4
\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
0.767874 (row 1) + 0.5678833 (row 2) - 0.950574 (row 3)
=
0.3851876 &nbsp;.
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
====Example Evaluation====
Let's evaluate these expressions, borrowing from the [[#QuantitativeExample|quantitative example specified above]].  Specifically, we choose,
<table border="0" align="center" width="80%">
<tr>
  <td align="center"><math>\frac{a_s}{a_\ell} = 0.582724 \, ,</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>e = 0.81267 \, ,</math></td>
  <td align="center">&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center"><math>A_\ell = A_m = 0.51589042 \, ,</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>A_s = 0.96821916 \, ,</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>I_\mathrm{BT} = \frac{2}{3}\Upsilon = 1.360556 \, ,</math></td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center"><math>a_\ell^2 A_{\ell \ell} = 0.3287756 \, ,</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>a_\ell^2 A_{s s} = 1.5066848 \, ,</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>a_\ell^2 A_{\ell s} = 0.6848975 \, .</math></td>
</tr>
</table>
Also, let's set <math>\rho/\rho_c = 0.1</math> and <math>\chi = \chi_1 = 0.75 ~~\Rightarrow ~~ \chi_1^2 = 0.5625</math>.  This means that,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
\zeta_1^2
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
(1-e^2)\biggl[1 - \chi^2 - \frac{\rho(\chi, \zeta)}{\rho_c} \biggr]
=
\biggl[1 - (0.81267)^2)\biggr]\biggl[1 - 0.5625 - 0.1\biggr]
=
0.11460
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
\Rightarrow ~~~ \zeta_1
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
0.33853 \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
So, let's evaluate the gravitational potential &hellip;
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\frac{ \Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\chi_1,\zeta_1)}{(-\pi G\rho_c a_\ell^2)} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2} I_\mathrm{BT} 
- \biggl[\overbrace{A_\ell \chi^2  + A_s \zeta^2}^{\mathrm{TERM2}}  \biggr]
+ \frac{1}{2}\biggl[
\underbrace{(A_{s s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^4 + 2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )\chi^2 \zeta^2 + (A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2)  \chi^4 }_{\mathrm{TERM1}}
\biggr]
=
0.385187372
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\mathrm{TERM1} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
0.019788921 + 0.088303509 + 0.104026655 = 0.212119085
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\mathrm{TERM2} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
0.290188361 + 0.110961809
=
0.401150171 \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
====Replace &zeta; With Normalized Density====
First, let's readjust the last, 3-row expression for the gravitational potential so that <math>\zeta^2</math> can be readily replaced with the normalized density.
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\frac{ \Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\chi,\zeta)}{(-\pi G\rho_c a_\ell^2)} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{3} \Upsilon
-
\frac{(\Upsilon - 3)}{3e^2} (\chi^2 - 2\zeta^2)
+ ~ \frac{4(1-e^2)}{3e^{2}}\biggl\{
\biggl[(1-e^2)^{-1}\zeta^2 - \chi^2\biggr]\biggl[(1-e^2)^{-1} \zeta^2 + \frac{1}{4}\chi^2\biggr]
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- ~ \frac{(1-e^2)}{e^4}\biggl\{
\biggl[(1-e^2)^{-1}\zeta^2 - \chi^2\biggr]\biggl[ (1-e^2)^{-1}\zeta^2 - 2\chi^2\biggr]
\biggr\}
+~
\frac{\Upsilon}{3e^4}\biggl[ (\zeta^2 - \chi^2)(\zeta^2-2\chi^2)  \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- ~\chi^2
+ ~ \frac{1}{24e^4}\biggl\{
2 e^2(1-e^2)
+ 39(1-e^2)
- 13\Upsilon \biggr\}\chi^4
\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
Now make the substitution,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\zeta^2</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
(1-e^2)\biggl[1 - \chi^2 - \rho^*\biggr]
\, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
where,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\rho^*</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{\rho(\chi, \zeta)}{\rho_c}
\, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
We have,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\frac{ \Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\chi,\zeta)}{(-\pi G\rho_c a_\ell^2)} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{3} \Upsilon
-
\frac{(\Upsilon - 3)}{3e^2} \biggl\{ \chi^2 - 2(1-e^2)\biggl[1 - \chi^2 - \rho^*\biggr] \biggr\}
+ ~ \frac{4(1-e^2)}{3e^{2}}
\biggl\{\biggl[1 - \chi^2 - \rho^*\biggr] - \chi^2\biggr\}\biggl\{\biggl[1 - \chi^2 - \rho^*\biggr] + \frac{1}{4}\chi^2\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- ~ \frac{(1-e^2)}{e^4}
\biggl\{\biggl[1 - \chi^2 - \rho^*\biggr] - \chi^2\biggr\}\biggl\{ \biggl[1 - \chi^2 - \rho^*\biggr] - 2\chi^2\biggr\}
+~
\frac{\Upsilon}{3e^4}\biggl\{ (1-e^2)\biggl[1 - \chi^2 - \rho^*\biggr] - \chi^2\biggr\}
\biggl\{(1-e^2)\biggl[1 - \chi^2 - \rho^*\biggr] - 2\chi^2  \biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- ~\chi^2
+ ~ \frac{1}{24e^4}\biggl\{
2 e^2(1-e^2)
+ 39(1-e^2)
- 13\Upsilon \biggr\}\chi^4
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{3} \Upsilon
-
\frac{(\Upsilon - 3)}{3e^2} \biggl\{ -2+2e^2 + (3-2e^2)\chi^2 + (2-2e^2)\rho^* \biggr\}
+ ~ \frac{4(1-e^2)}{3e^{2}}
\biggl\{1 - 2\chi^2 - \rho^*\biggr\}\biggl\{1 - \frac{3}{4}\chi^2 - \rho^*\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- ~ \frac{(1-e^2)}{e^4}
\biggl\{1 - 2\chi^2 - \rho^*\biggr\}\biggl\{ 1 - 3\chi^2 - \rho^* \biggr\}
+~
\frac{\Upsilon}{3e^4}\biggl\{ (1-e^2) - (2-e^2)\chi^2 - (1-e^2)\rho^* \biggr\}
\biggl\{(1-e^2) - (3-e^2)\chi^2 - (1-e^2)\rho^*  \biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- ~\chi^2
+ ~ \frac{1}{24e^4}\biggl\{
39 - 37e^2
- 2e^4
- 13\Upsilon \biggr\}\chi^4
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{3} \Upsilon
-
\frac{(\Upsilon - 3)}{3e^2} \biggl\{ -2 + 3\chi^2 + 2\rho^* + 2e^2\biggl[1 -\chi^2 -\rho^* \biggr] \biggr\}
+ ~ \frac{4(1-e^2)}{3e^{2}}
\biggl\{1 - 2\chi^2 - \rho^*\biggr\}\biggl\{1 - \frac{3}{4}\chi^2 - \rho^*\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- ~ \frac{(1-e^2)}{e^4}
\biggl\{1 - 2\chi^2 - \rho^*\biggr\}\biggl\{ 1 - 3\chi^2 - \rho^* \biggr\}
+~
\biggl\{ \frac{\Upsilon}{3e^4}\biggl[ 1 - 2\chi^2 - \rho^*\biggr] + \frac{\Upsilon}{3e^2}\biggl[ - 1 + \chi^2  + \rho^* \biggr] \biggr\}
\biggl\{(1-e^2) - (3-e^2)\chi^2 - (1-e^2)\rho^*  \biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- ~\chi^2
+ ~ \frac{1}{24e^4}\biggl\{
39 - 37e^2
- 2e^4
- 13\Upsilon \biggr\}\chi^4
\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
0.767874 (row 1) + 0.5678833 (row 2) - 0.950574 (row 3)
=
0.3851876 &nbsp;.
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
Now, let's group together like terms and examine, in particular, whether the coefficient of the cross-product, <math>\chi^2 \rho^*)</math>, goes to zero.
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\frac{ \Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\chi,\zeta)}{(-\pi G\rho_c a_\ell^2)} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{3} \Upsilon
-
\frac{(\Upsilon - 3)}{3e^2} \biggl\{2e^2 -2 + (2 - 2e^2)\rho^* \biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
+ ~
\biggl[1 - 2\chi^2 - \rho^*\biggr]
\biggl\{ \frac{4(1-e^2)}{3e^{2}}\biggl[1 - \frac{3}{4}\chi^2 - \rho^*\biggr]
- ~ \frac{(1-e^2)}{e^4}\biggl[ 1 - 3\chi^2 - \rho^* \biggr]
+ \biggl[\frac{\Upsilon}{3e^4} - \frac{\Upsilon}{3e^2}\biggr]\biggl[(1-e^2) - (3-e^2)\chi^2 - (1-e^2)\rho^*  \biggr]
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
-~
\biggl\{ \frac{\Upsilon}{3e^2} \biggr\}\biggl[(1-e^2) - (3-e^2)\chi^2 - (1-e^2)\rho^*  \biggr]\chi^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- ~\chi^2
+ ~ \frac{1}{24e^4}\biggl\{
39 - 37e^2
- 2e^4
- 13\Upsilon \biggr\}\chi^4
-
\frac{(\Upsilon - 3)}{3e^2} \biggl\{ 3\chi^2 - 2e^2\chi^2 \biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{3} \Upsilon
+
\frac{(\Upsilon - 3)}{3e^2} \biggl\{2(1 - e^2)(1 - \rho^*) \biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
+ ~
\biggl[1 - 2\chi^2 - \rho^*\biggr]
\frac{(1-e^2)}{3e^{4}}\biggl\{ 4e^2\biggl[1 - \frac{3}{4}\chi^2 - \rho^*\biggr]
- 3\biggl[ 1 - 3\chi^2 - \rho^* \biggr]
+ \Upsilon \biggl[(1-e^2) - (3-e^2)\chi^2 - (1-e^2)\rho^*  \biggr]
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
+~ \biggl\{ \frac{\Upsilon}{3e^2} \biggr\}\biggl[(1-e^2)\rho^*  \biggr]\chi^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- ~\chi^2
+ ~ \frac{1}{24e^4}\biggl\{
39 - 37e^2
- 2e^4
- 13\Upsilon \biggr\}\chi^4
-
\frac{(\Upsilon - 3)}{3e^2} \biggl\{ 3\chi^2 - 2e^2\chi^2 \biggr\}
-~ \biggl\{ \frac{\Upsilon}{3e^2} \biggr\}\biggl[(1-e^2) - (3-e^2)\chi^2  \biggr]\chi^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{3} \Upsilon
+
\frac{(\Upsilon - 3)}{3e^2} \biggl\{2(1 - e^2)(1 - \rho^*) \biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
+ ~
\biggl[(1 - \rho^*) \biggr]
\frac{(1-e^2)}{3e^{4}}\biggl\{
\biggl[4e^2 - 3 + \Upsilon (1-e^2)\biggr] (1 - \rho^* )
\biggr\}
+ ~
\biggl[- 2\chi^2\biggr]
\frac{(1-e^2)}{3e^{4}}\biggl\{
\biggl[4e^2 - 3 + \Upsilon (1-e^2)\biggr] (1 - \rho^* )
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
+ ~
\biggl[(1 - \rho^*) \biggr]
\frac{(1-e^2)}{3e^{4}}\biggl\{
\biggl[- 3e^2 +9 - (3-e^2)\Upsilon \biggr]\chi^2 
\biggr\}
+ ~
\biggl[- 2\chi^2\biggr]
\frac{(1-e^2)}{3e^{4}}\biggl\{
\biggl[- 3e^2 +9 - (3-e^2)\Upsilon \biggr]\chi^2 
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
+~ \biggl[ \frac{\Upsilon(1-e^2)}{3e^2} \biggr]\rho^*\chi^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- ~\chi^2
+ ~ \frac{1}{24e^4}\biggl\{
39 - 37e^2
- 2e^4
- 13\Upsilon \biggr\}\chi^4
-
\frac{(\Upsilon - 3)}{3e^2} \biggl\{ 3\chi^2 - 2e^2\chi^2 \biggr\}
-~ \biggl\{ \frac{\Upsilon}{3e^2} \biggr\}\biggl[(1-e^2) - (3-e^2)\chi^2  \biggr]\chi^2
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>

Revision as of 19:53, 7 November 2024

Parabolic Density Distribution


Part I:   Gravitational Potential

 


Part II:   Spherical Structures

 


Part III:   Axisymmetric Equilibrium Structures

 Old: 1st thru 7th tries
 Old: 8th thru 10th tries


Part IV:   Triaxial Equilibrium Structures (Exploration)

 

Axisymmetric (Oblate) Equilibrium Structures

Tentative Summary

Known Relations

Density:

ρ(ϖ,z)ρc

=

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1],

Gravitational Potential:

Φgrav(ϖ,z)(−πGρcaℓ2)

=

12IBT−Aℓχ2−Asζ2+12[(Assaℓ2)ζ4+2(Aℓsaℓ2)χ2ζ2+(Aℓℓaℓ2)χ4].

Vertical Pressure Gradient: [1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ =

ρρc⋅[2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

where, χ≡ϖ/aℓ and ζ≡z/aℓ, and the relevant index symbol expressions are:

IBT =

2Aℓ+As(1−e2)=2(1−e2)1/2[sin−1ee];

Aℓ

=

1e2[sin−1ee−(1−e2)1/2](1−e2)1/2;

As =

2e2[(1−e2)−1/2−sin−1ee](1−e2)1/2;

aℓ2Aℓℓ

=

14e4{−(3+2e2)(1−e2)+3(1−e2)1/2[sin−1ee]};

32aℓ2Ass

=

(4e2−3)e4(1−e2)+3(1−e2)1/2e4[sin−1ee];

aℓ2Aℓs

=

1e4{(3−e2)−3(1−e2)1/2[sin−1ee]},

where the eccentricity,

e≡[1−(asaℓ)2]1/2.

Drawing from our separate "6th Try" discussion — and as has been highlighted here for example — for the axisymmetric configurations under consideration, the e^z and e^ϖ components of the Euler equation become, respectively,

e^z:    

0

=

[1ρ∂P∂z+∂Φ∂z]

e^ϖ:    

j2ϖ3

=

[1ρ∂P∂ϖ+∂Φ∂ϖ]

Multiplying through by length (aℓ) and dividing through by the square of the velocity (πGρcaℓ2), we have,

e^z:    

0

=

[1ρ∂P∂z+∂Φ∂z]aℓ(πGρcaℓ2)

 

 

=

ρcρ⋅∂∂ζ[P(πGρc2aℓ2)]−∂∂ζ[Φ(−πGρcaℓ2)]

e^ϖ:    

j2ϖ3⋅aℓ(πGρcaℓ2)

=

[1ρ∂P∂ϖ+∂Φ∂ϖ]aℓ(πGρcaℓ2)

 

⇒1χ3⋅j2(πGρcaℓ4)

=

ρcρ⋅∂∂χ[P(πGρc2aℓ2)]−∂∂χ[Φ(−πGρcaℓ2)]

8th Try

Foundation

Density:

ρ*≡ρ(χ,ζ)ρc

=

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1],

Gravitational Potential:

Φgrav(χ,ζ)(−πGρcaℓ2)

=

12IBT−Aℓχ2−Asζ2+12[(Assaℓ2)ζ4+2(Aℓsaℓ2)χ2ζ2+(Aℓℓaℓ2)χ4].

Complete the Square

Again, let's rewrite the term inside square brackets on the RHS of the expression for the gravitational potential,

[]RHS

≡

[(Assaℓ2)ζ4+2(Aℓsaℓ2)χ2ζ2+(Aℓℓaℓ2)χ4],

in such a way that we effectively "complete the square." Assuming that the desired expression takes the form,

[]RHS

=

[(Assaℓ2)1/2ζ2+Bχ2][(Assaℓ2)1/2ζ2+Cχ2]

 

=

(Assaℓ2)ζ4+(Assaℓ2)1/2(B+C)ζ2χ2+BCχ4,

we see that we must have,

(Assaℓ2)1/2(B+C)

=

2(Aℓsaℓ2)

⇒B

=

2(Aℓsaℓ2)(Assaℓ2)1/2−C;

and we must also have,

BC

=

(Aℓℓaℓ2)

⇒B

=

(Aℓℓaℓ2)C.

Hence,

(Aℓℓaℓ2)C

=

2(Aℓsaℓ2)(Assaℓ2)1/2−C

⇒0

=

C2−2[(Aℓsaℓ2)(Assaℓ2)1/2]C+(Aℓℓaℓ2).

The pair of roots of this quadratic expression are,

C±

=

[(Aℓsaℓ2)(Assaℓ2)1/2]±12{4[(Aℓsaℓ2)2(Assaℓ2)]−4(Aℓℓaℓ2)}1/2

 

=

(Aℓsaℓ2)(Assaℓ2)1/2{1±[1−(Assaℓ2)(Aℓℓaℓ2)(Aℓsaℓ2)2]1/2}

⇒C±(Assaℓ2)1/2

=

(Aℓsaℓ2)(Assaℓ2){1±[1−(Assaℓ2)(Aℓℓaℓ2)(Aℓsaℓ2)2]1/2}.

Also, then,

B±(Assaℓ2)1/2

=

2(Aℓsaℓ2)(Assaℓ2)−C±(Assaℓ2)1/2

 

=

2(Aℓsaℓ2)(Assaℓ2)−(Aℓsaℓ2)(Assaℓ2){1±[1−(Assaℓ2)(Aℓℓaℓ2)(Aℓsaℓ2)2]1/2}

 

=

(Aℓsaℓ2)(Assaℓ2){1∓[1−(Assaℓ2)(Aℓℓaℓ2)(Aℓsaℓ2)2]1/2}.

NOTE: Given that,

(Assaℓ2)

=

23(1−e2)−23(Aℓsaℓ2)

      and,      

(Aℓℓaℓ2)

=

12−14(Aℓsaℓ2),

we can write,

Lambda vs Eccentricity
Lambda vs Eccentricity

Λ≡(Assaℓ2)(Aℓℓaℓ2)(Aℓsaℓ2)2

=

1(Aℓsaℓ2)2{[23(1−e2)−23(Aℓsaℓ2)][12−14(Aℓsaℓ2)]}

 

=

16(Aℓsaℓ2)2{1(1−e2)[2−(Aℓsaℓ2)]−(Aℓsaℓ2)[2−(Aℓsaℓ2)]}

 

=

16(Aℓsaℓ2)2{[1(1−e2)−(Aℓsaℓ2)][2−(Aℓsaℓ2)]}

In summary, then, we can write,

B±(Assaℓ2)1/2

=

(Aℓsaℓ2)(Assaℓ2)[1∓(1−Λ)1/2]

      and,      

C±(Assaℓ2)1/2

=

(Aℓsaℓ2)(Assaℓ2)[1±(1−Λ)1/2],

where, as illustrated by the inset "Lambda vs Eccentricity" plot, for all values of the eccentricity (0<e≤1), the quantity, Λ, is greater than unity. It is clear, then, that both roots of the relevant quadratic equation are complex — i.e., they have imaginary components. But that's okay because the coefficients that appear in the right-hand-side, bracketed quartic expression appear in the combinations,

(BC)±

=

(Aℓsaℓ2)2(Assaℓ2)[1−(1−Λ)1/2][1+(1−Λ)1/2]=(Aℓsaℓ2)2(Assaℓ2)[Λ]=(Aℓℓaℓ2),

(B+C)±

=

(Aℓsaℓ2)(Assaℓ2)1/2[1∓(1−Λ)1/2]+(Aℓsaℓ2)(Assaℓ2)1/2[1±(1−Λ)1/2]=2(Aℓsaℓ2)(Assaℓ2)1/2,

both of which are real.

9th Try

Starting Key Relations

Density:

ρ(ϖ,z)ρc

=

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1],

Gravitational Potential:

Φgrav(ϖ,z)(−πGρcaℓ2)

=

12IBT−Aℓχ2−Asζ2+12[(Assaℓ2)ζ4+2(Aℓsaℓ2)χ2ζ2+(Aℓℓaℓ2)χ4].

Vertical Pressure Gradient: [1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ =

ρρc⋅[2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

Play With Vertical Pressure Gradient

[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ =

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1][2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

  =

[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)ζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]−χ2[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)ζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]−ζ2(1−e2)−1[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)ζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

  =

(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)ζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3−(2Aℓsaℓ2χ4−2Asχ2)ζ−2Assaℓ2χ2ζ3−(1−e2)−1[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)ζ3+2Assaℓ2ζ5]

  =

[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)−(2Aℓsaℓ2χ4−2Asχ2)]ζ+[2Assaℓ2−2Assaℓ2χ2−(1−e2)−1(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)]ζ3+[−(1−e2)−12Assaℓ2]ζ5.

Integrate over ζ gives …

[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∫[∂P∂ζ]dζ =

[(Aℓsaℓ2χ2−As)−(Aℓsaℓ2χ4−Asχ2)]ζ2+12[Assaℓ2−Assaℓ2χ2−(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2χ2−As)]ζ4+13[−(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2]ζ6+const

  =

[−Asζ2+12Assaℓ2ζ4+12(1−e2)−1Asζ4−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ6]χ0+[Aℓsaℓ2ζ2+Asζ2−12Assaℓ2ζ4−12(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)]χ2+[−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2]χ4+const.

Now Play With Radial Pressure Gradient

[1(−πGρcaℓ2)]∂Φ∂χ =

ρρc⋅{−2Aℓχ+12[4(Aℓsaℓ2)ζ2χ+4(Aℓℓaℓ2)χ3]}

  =

2[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1][(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)χ+Aℓℓaℓ2χ3]

  =

2[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)χ+Aℓℓaℓ2χ3]−2χ2[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)χ+Aℓℓaℓ2χ3]−2ζ2(1−e2)−1[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)χ+Aℓℓaℓ2χ3]

  =

2(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)χ+2[Aℓℓaℓ2+(Aℓ−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2)]χ3−2Aℓℓaℓ2χ5+2(1−e2)−1[(Aℓζ2−Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)χ−Aℓℓaℓ2ζ2χ3]

  =

2[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)+(1−e2)−1(Aℓζ2−Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)]χ+2[Aℓℓaℓ2+(Aℓ−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2)−(1−e2)−1Aℓℓaℓ2ζ2]χ3−2Aℓℓaℓ2χ5

Add a term j2∼(j42χ4+j62χ6) to account for centrifugal acceleration …

[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂χ=[1(−πGρcaℓ2)]∂Φ∂χ+j2χ3[ρρc] =

2[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)+(1−e2)−1(Aℓζ2−Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)]χ+2[Aℓℓaℓ2+(Aℓ−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2)−(1−e2)−1Aℓℓaℓ2ζ2]χ3−2Aℓℓaℓ2χ5+j2χ3[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1]

  =

2[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)+(1−e2)−1(Aℓζ2−Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)]χ+2[Aℓℓaℓ2+(Aℓ−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2)−(1−e2)−1Aℓℓaℓ2ζ2]χ3−2Aℓℓaℓ2χ5

   

+(j42χ4+j62χ6)χ3−(j42χ4+j62χ6)χ3[χ2]−(j42χ4+j62χ6)χ3[ζ2(1−e2)−1]

  =

2[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)+(1−e2)−1(Aℓζ2−Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)]χ+2[Aℓℓaℓ2+(Aℓ−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2)−(1−e2)−1Aℓℓaℓ2ζ2]χ3−2Aℓℓaℓ2χ5

   

+(j42χ+j62χ3)−(j42χ+j62χ3)[ζ2(1−e2)−1]−(j42χ3+j62χ5)

  =

2[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)+(1−e2)−1(Aℓζ2−Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)]χ+2[Aℓℓaℓ2+(Aℓ−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2)−(1−e2)−1Aℓℓaℓ2ζ2]χ3−2Aℓℓaℓ2χ5

   

−[j42ζ2(1−e2)−1−j42]χ−[j42+j62ζ2(1−e2)−1−j62]χ3−[j62]χ5

  =

[2(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)+2(1−e2)−1(Aℓζ2−Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)−j42ζ2(1−e2)−1+j42]χ

   

+[2Aℓℓaℓ2+2(Aℓ−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2)−2(1−e2)−1Aℓℓaℓ2ζ2−j42−j62ζ2(1−e2)−1+j62]χ3+[−j62−2Aℓℓaℓ2]χ5

Integrate over χ gives …

[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∫[∂P∂χ]dχ =

[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)+(1−e2)−1(Aℓζ2−Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)−12j42ζ2(1−e2)−1+12j42]χ2

   

+[12Aℓℓaℓ2+12(Aℓ−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2)−12(1−e2)−1Aℓℓaℓ2ζ2−14j42−14j62ζ2(1−e2)−1+14j62]χ4−[16j62+13Aℓℓaℓ2]χ6

Compare Pair of Integrations

  Integration over ζ Integration over χ
χ0 −Asζ2+12Assaℓ2ζ4+12(1−e2)−1Asζ4−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ6 none
χ2

Aℓsaℓ2ζ2+Asζ2−12Assaℓ2ζ4−12(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)

(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)+(1−e2)−1(Aℓζ2−Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)−12j42ζ2(1−e2)−1+12j42

χ4

−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2

12Aℓℓaℓ2+12(Aℓ−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2)−12(1−e2)−1Aℓℓaℓ2ζ2−14j42−14j62ζ2(1−e2)−1+14j62

χ6

none

−16j62−13Aℓℓaℓ2

Try, j62=[−2Aℓℓaℓ2] and 12j42=[Aℓ+(Aℓsaℓ2)ζ2].

  Integration over ζ Integration over χ
χ0 −Asζ2+12Assaℓ2ζ4+12(1−e2)−1Asζ4−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ6 none
χ2 Aℓsaℓ2ζ2+Asζ2−12Assaℓ2ζ4−12(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)

(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)+(1−e2)−1(Aℓζ2−Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)−12j42ζ2(1−e2)−1+12j42
=
(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)+(1−e2)−1(Aℓζ2−Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)−[Aℓ+(Aℓsaℓ2)ζ2]ζ2(1−e2)−1+[Aℓ+(Aℓsaℓ2)ζ2]
=
2(Aℓsaℓ2)ζ2[1−ζ2(1−e2)−1]

χ4

−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2

12Aℓℓaℓ2+12(Aℓ−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2)−12(1−e2)−1Aℓℓaℓ2ζ2−14j42−14[−2Aℓℓaℓ2]ζ2(1−e2)−1+14[−2Aℓℓaℓ2]
=
14[2(Aℓ−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2)−2[Aℓ+(Aℓsaℓ2)ζ2]]=−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2

χ6

none

0

What expression for j42 is required in order to ensure that the χ2 term is the same in both columns?

12j42[1−ζ2(1−e2)−1] =

[Aℓsaℓ2ζ2+Asζ2−12Assaℓ2ζ4−12(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)]−[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)+(1−e2)−1(Aℓζ2−Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)]

  =

[Asζ2−12Assaℓ2ζ4−12(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)]+[(Aℓ)−(1−e2)−1(Aℓζ2)+(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)]

  =

[Asζ2−12Assaℓ2ζ4+12(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2)ζ4]+Aℓ[1−(1−e2)−1ζ2]

⇒12j42[1−ζ2(1−e2)−1]−Aℓ[1−ζ2(1−e2)−1] =

12(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2)ζ4+[As]ζ2−12[Assaℓ2]ζ4

Now, considering the following three relations …

32(Assaℓ2)

=

(1−e2)−1−(Aℓsaℓ2);

As

=

Aℓ+e2(Aℓsaℓ2);

e2(Aℓsaℓ2)

=

2−3Aℓ;

we can write,

12j42[1−ζ2(1−e2)−1]−Aℓ[1−ζ2(1−e2)−1] =

12(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2)ζ4+[Aℓ+e2(Aℓsaℓ2)]ζ2−13[(1−e2)−1−(Aℓsaℓ2)]ζ4

⇒3j42[1−ζ2(1−e2)−1]−3Aℓ[2−2ζ2(1−e2)−1] =

3(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2)ζ4+6[Aℓ+e2(Aℓsaℓ2)]ζ2−2[(1−e2)−1−(Aℓsaℓ2)]ζ4

 

=

(Aℓsaℓ2){2ζ4+3ζ4(1−e2)−1+6e2ζ2}−2ζ4(1−e2)−1+6Aℓζ2

 

=

−2ζ4(1−e2)−1+6Aℓζ2+[2−3Aℓ]{2ζ4+3ζ4(1−e2)−1+6e2ζ2}1e2

 

=

−2ζ4(1−e2)−1−3Aℓ{2ζ4+3ζ4(1−e2)−1+4e2ζ2}1e2+{4ζ4+6ζ4(1−e2)−1+12e2ζ2}1e2


⇒3j42[1−ζ2(1−e2)−1] =

−2ζ4(1−e2)−1+3Aℓ(1−e2)−1e2{[2e2(1−e2)−2e2ζ2]−[2ζ4(1−e2)+3ζ4+4e2(1−e2)ζ2]}+{4ζ4+6ζ4(1−e2)−1+12e2ζ2}1e2

10th Try

Repeating Key Relations

Density:

ρ(ϖ,z)ρc

=

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1],

Gravitational Potential:

Φgrav(ϖ,z)(−πGρcaℓ2)

=

12IBT−Aℓχ2−Asζ2+12[(Assaℓ2)ζ4+2(Aℓsaℓ2)χ2ζ2+(Aℓℓaℓ2)χ4].

Vertical Pressure Gradient: [1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ =

ρρc⋅[2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

From the above (9th Try) examination of the vertical pressure gradient, we determined that a reasonably good approximation for the normalized pressure throughout the configuration is given by the expression,

[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∫[∂P∂ζ]dζ =

[−Asζ2+12Assaℓ2ζ4+12(1−e2)−1Asζ4−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ6]χ0+[Aℓsaℓ2ζ2+Asζ2−12Assaℓ2ζ4−12(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)]χ2+[−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2]χ4+const.

If we set χ=0 — that is, if we look along the vertical axis — this approximation should be particularly good, resulting in the expression,

Pz≡{[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∫[∂P∂ζ]dζ}χ=0 =

Pc*−Asζ2+12Assaℓ2ζ4+12(1−e2)−1Asζ4−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ6.

Note that in the limit that z→as — that is, at the pole along the vertical (symmetry) axis where the Pz should drop to zero — we should set ζ→(1−e2)1/2. This allows us to determine the central pressure.

Pc* =

As(1−e2)−12Assaℓ2(1−e2)2−12(1−e2)−1As(1−e2)2+13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2(1−e2)3

  =

As(1−e2)−12As(1−e2)+13Assaℓ2(1−e2)2−12Assaℓ2(1−e2)2

  =

12As(1−e2)−16Assaℓ2(1−e2)2.

This means that, along the vertical axis, the pressure gradient is,

Pz≡{[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∫[∂P∂ζ]dζ}χ=0 =

Pc*−Asζ2+12Assaℓ2ζ4+12(1−e2)−1Asζ4−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ6.

∂Pz∂ζ =

−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3+2(1−e2)−1Asζ3−2(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ5.

This should match the more general "vertical pressure gradient" expression when we set, χ=0, that is,

{[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ}χ=0 =

[1−χ20−ζ2(1−e2)−1]⋅[2Aℓsaℓ2ζχ20−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

  =

[−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]+ζ2(1−e2)−1[2Asζ−2Assaℓ2ζ3]

Yes! The expressions match!

Shift to ξ1 Coordinate

In an accompanying chapter, we defined the coordinate,

(ξ1as)2 ≡

(ϖaℓ)2+(zas)2=χ2+ζ2(1−e2)−1.

Given that we want the pressure to be constant on ξ1 surfaces, it seems plausible that ζ2 should be replaced by (1−e2)(ξ1/as)2=[(1−e2)χ2+ζ2] in the expression for Pz. That is, we might expect the expression for the pressure at any point in the meridional plane to be,

Ptest01 =

Pc*−As[(1−e2)χ2+ζ2]1+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As][(1−e2)χ2+ζ2]2−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2[(1−e2)χ2+ζ2]3

  =

Pc*−As[(1−e2)χ2+ζ2]1+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As][(1−e2)2χ4+2(1−e2)χ2ζ2+ζ4]−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2[(1−e2)χ2+ζ2][(1−e2)2χ4+2(1−e2)χ2ζ2+ζ4]

  =

Pc*−As[(1−e2)χ2+ζ2]+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As][(1−e2)2χ4+2(1−e2)χ2ζ2+ζ4]

   

−13Assaℓ2[(1−e2)2χ6+2(1−e2)χ4ζ2+χ2ζ4]−13Assaℓ2[(1−e2)χ4ζ2+2χ2ζ4+(1−e2)−1ζ6]

  =

χ0{Pc*−Asζ2+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As]ζ4−13Assaℓ2(1−e2)−1ζ6}+χ2{−As(1−e2)+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As]2(1−e2)ζ2−13Assaℓ2ζ4−23Assaℓ2ζ4}

   

+χ4{12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As](1−e2)2−23Assaℓ2(1−e2)ζ2−13Assaℓ2(1−e2)ζ2}+χ6{−13Assaℓ2(1−e2)2}

  =

χ0{Pc*−Asζ2+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As]ζ4−13Assaℓ2(1−e2)−1ζ6}+χ2{−As(1−e2)+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As]2(1−e2)ζ2−Assaℓ2ζ4}

   

+χ4{12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As](1−e2)2−Assaℓ2(1−e2)ζ2}+χ6{−13Assaℓ2(1−e2)2}

  Integration over ζ Pressure Guess
χ0 −Asζ2+12Assaℓ2ζ4+12(1−e2)−1Asζ4−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ6

Pc*−Asζ2+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As]ζ4−13Assaℓ2(1−e2)−1ζ6

χ2

Aℓsaℓ2ζ2+Asζ2−12Assaℓ2ζ4−12(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)

−As(1−e2)+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As]2(1−e2)ζ2−Assaℓ2ζ4

χ4

−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2

12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As](1−e2)2−Assaℓ2(1−e2)ζ2

χ6

none

−13Assaℓ2(1−e2)2

Compare Vertical Pressure Gradient Expressions

From our above (9th try) derivation we know that the vertical pressure gradient is given by the expression,

[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ =

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1][2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

  =

[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)−(2Aℓsaℓ2χ4−2Asχ2)]ζ+[2Assaℓ2−2Assaℓ2χ2−(1−e2)−1(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)]ζ3+[−(1−e2)−12Assaℓ2]ζ5.

  =

[2As(χ2−1)+2Aℓsaℓ2(1−χ2)χ2]ζ+[2Assaℓ2(1−χ2)−2Aℓsaℓ2(1−e2)−1χ2+2(1−e2)−1As]ζ3+[−2Assaℓ2(1−e2)−1]ζ5.

By comparison, the vertical derivative of our "test01" pressure expression gives,

Ptest01 =

χ0{Pc*−Asζ2+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As]ζ4−13Assaℓ2(1−e2)−1ζ6}+χ2{−As(1−e2)+12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As]2(1−e2)ζ2−Assaℓ2ζ4}

   

+χ4{12[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As](1−e2)2−Assaℓ2(1−e2)ζ2}+χ6{−13Assaℓ2(1−e2)2}

⇒∂Ptest01∂ζ =

χ0{−2Asζ+2[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As]ζ3−2Assaℓ2(1−e2)−1ζ5}+χ2{2[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As](1−e2)ζ−4Assaℓ2ζ3}+χ4{−2Assaℓ2(1−e2)ζ}

  =

ζ1{−2As+2[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As](1−e2)χ2−2Assaℓ2(1−e2)χ4}+ζ3{2[Assaℓ2+(1−e2)−1As]−4Assaℓ2χ2}+ζ5{−2Assaℓ2(1−e2)−1}

  =

ζ1{2As(χ2−1)+2Assaℓ2(1−e2)χ2(1−χ2)}+ζ3{2Assaℓ2(1−2χ2)+2(1−e2)−1As}+ζ5{−2Assaℓ2(1−e2)−1}

Instead, try …

Ptest02Pc =

p2(ρρc)2+p3(ρρc)3

⇒∂∂ζ[Ptest02Pc] =

2p2(ρρc)∂∂ζ[ρρc]+3p3(ρρc)2∂∂ζ[ρρc]

  =

(ρρc){2p2+3p3(ρρc)}∂∂ζ[ρρc]

  =

(ρρc){2p2+3p3[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1]}∂∂ζ[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1]

  =

(ρρc){(2p2+3p3)−3p3χ2−3p3ζ2(1−e2)−1}[−2ζ(1−e2)−1]

  =

(ρρc)(1−e2)−2{6p3χ2ζ(1−e2)−2(2p2+3p3)(1−e2)ζ+6p3ζ3}

Compare the term inside the curly braces with the term, from the beginning of this subsection, inside the square brackets, namely,

2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3 =

2e4[(3−e2)−Υ]χ2ζ−[4e2(1−13Υ)]ζ+43e4[4e2−3(1−e2)+Υ]ζ3

  =

13e4(1−e2){6[(3−e2)−Υ](1−e2)χ2ζ−[12e2(1−13Υ)](1−e2)ζ+4[(4e2−3)+Υ]ζ3}.

Pretty Close!!

Alternatively:   according to the third term, we need to set,

6p3 =

4[(4e2−3)+Υ]

⇒Υ =

32p3+(3−4e2)

in which case, the first coefficient must be given by the expression,

[(3−e2)−Υ] =

(3−e2)−32p3+(4e2−3)]=[3e2−32p3].

And, from the second coefficient, we find,

2(2p2+3p3) =

[12e2(1−13Υ)]

⇒2p2 =

2e2(3−Υ)−3p3

 

=

−3p3+6e2−2e2[32p3+(3−4e2)]

 

=

−3p3+6e2−[3e2p3+6e2−8e4]

 

=

8e4−3p3(1+e2);

or,

p2

=

4e4−(1+e2)[(4e2−3)+Υ]

 

=

4e4−(1+e2)(4e2−3)−(1+e2)Υ

 

=

4e4−[4e2−3+4e4−3e2]−(1+e2)Υ

 

=

3−e2−(1+e2)Υ


SUMMARY:

Ptest02Pc =

p2(ρρc)2+p3(ρρc)3,

p2

=

3−e2−(1+e2)Υ=e4(Aℓsaℓ2)−e2Υ,

p3 =

23[(4e2−3)+Υ]=e4(Assaℓ2)+23e2Υ.


Note:   according to the first term, we need to set,

p3 =

[(3−e2)−Υ]

⇒Υ =

[(3−e2)−p3],

in which case, the third coefficient must be given by the expression,

4[(4e2−3)+Υ] =

4[(4e2−3)+(3−e2)−p3]=4[3e2−p3].

And, from the second coefficient, we find,

2(2p2+3p3) =

[12e2(1−13Υ)]

⇒2p2 =

2e2(3−Υ)−3p3

 

=

2e2[3−[(3−e2)−p3]]−3p3

 

=

2e2[e2+p3]−3p3

 

=

2e4+(2e2−3)p3;

or,

2p2

=

2e4+(2e2−3)[(3−e2)−Υ]

 

=

2e4+(2e2−3)(3−e2)−(2e2−3)Υ

 

=

2e4+(6e2−2e4−9+3e2)−(2e2−3)Υ

 

=

9(e2−1)−(2e2−3)Υ

Better yet, try …

Ptest03Pc =

p2(ρρc)2[1−β(1−ρρc)]=p2(ρρc)2[(1−β)+β(ρρc)]

⇒∂∂ζ[Ptest03Pc] =

⋯

where, in the case of a spherically symmetric parabolic-density configuration, β=1/2. Well … this wasn't a bad idea, but as it turns out, this "test03" expression is no different from the "test02" guess. Specifically, the "test03" expression can be rewritten as,

Ptest03Pc =

p2(1−β)(ρρc)2+p2β(ρρc)3,

which has the same form as the "test02" expression.

Test04

From above, we understand that, analytically,

[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ =

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1][2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

  =

[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)−(2Aℓsaℓ2χ4−2Asχ2)]ζ+[2Assaℓ2−2Assaℓ2χ2−(1−e2)−1(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)]ζ3+[−(1−e2)−12Assaℓ2]ζ5

  =

[2As(χ2−1)+2Aℓsaℓ2(1−χ2)χ2]ζ+[2Assaℓ2(1−χ2)−2Aℓsaℓ2(1−e2)−1χ2+2(1−e2)−1As]ζ3+[−2Assaℓ2(1−e2)−1]ζ5.

Also from above, we have shown that if,

Ptest02Pc =

p2(ρρc)2+p3(ρρc)3

SUMMARY from test02:

p2

=

3−e2−(1+e2)Υ=e4(Aℓsaℓ2)−e2Υ,

p3 =

23[(4e2−3)+Υ]=e4(Assaℓ2)+23e2Υ.

⇒∂∂ζ[Ptest02Pc] =

(ρρc)(1−e2)−2{6p3χ2ζ(1−e2)−2(2p2+3p3)(1−e2)ζ+6p3ζ3}

  =

(ρρc)(1−e2)−2{6[e4(Assaℓ2)+23e2Υ]χ2ζ(1−e2)−2[2e4(Aℓsaℓ2)+3e4(Assaℓ2)](1−e2)ζ+6[e4(Assaℓ2)+23e2Υ]ζ3}




Here (test04), we add a term that is linear in the normalized density, which means,

Ptest04Pc =

Ptest02Pc+p1(ρρc)

⇒∂∂ζ[Ptest04Pc] =

∂∂ζ[Ptest02Pc]+∂∂ζ[p1(ρρc)]=∂∂ζ[Ptest02Pc]+p1∂∂ζ[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1]

See Also

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |