Line 21:
Line 21:
==Axisymmetric (Oblate) Equilibrium Structures==
==Axisymmetric (Oblate) Equilibrium Structures==
===Gravitational Potential===
As we have detailed in [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/FerrersPotential|an accompanying discussion]], for an oblate-spheroidal configuration — that is, when <math>a_s < a_m = a_\ell</math> — the gravitational potential may be obtained from the expression,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\frac{ \Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\mathbf{x})}{(-\pi G\rho_c)}</math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2} I_\mathrm{BT} a_1^2
- \biggl(A_1 x^2 + A_2 y^2 +A_3 z^2 \biggr)
+ \biggl( A_{12} x^2y^2 + A_{13} x^2z^2 + A_{23} y^2z^2\biggr)
+ \frac{1}{6} \biggl(3A_{11}x^4 + 3A_{22}y^4 + 3A_{33}z^4 \biggr)
\, ,
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
where, in the present context, we can rewrite this expression as,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\frac{ \Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\mathbf{x})}{(-\pi G\rho_c)}</math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2} I_\mathrm{BT} a_\ell^2
- \biggl[A_\ell (x^2 + y^2) + A_s z^2 \biggr]
+ \biggl[ A_{\ell \ell} x^2y^2 + A_{\ell s} x^2z^2 + A_{\ell s} y^2z^2\biggr]
+ \frac{1}{6} \biggl[3A_{\ell \ell} x^4 + 3A_{\ell \ell}y^4 + 3A_{ss}z^4 \biggr]
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2} I_\mathrm{BT} a_\ell^2
- \biggl[A_\ell \varpi^2 + A_s z^2 \biggr]
+ \biggl[ A_{\ell \ell} x^2y^2 + A_{\ell s} \varpi^2 z^2 \biggr]
+ \frac{1}{2} \biggl[A_{\ell \ell} (x^4 + y^4) + A_{ss}z^4 \biggr]
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2} I_\mathrm{BT} a_\ell^2
- \biggl[A_\ell \varpi^2 + A_s z^2 \biggr]
+ \frac{A_{\ell \ell}}{2} \biggl[(x^2 + y^2)^2\biggr]
+ \frac{1}{2} \biggl[ A_{ss}z^4 \biggr]
+ \biggl[ A_{\ell s} \varpi^2 z^2 \biggr]
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2} I_\mathrm{BT} a_\ell^2
- \biggl[A_\ell \varpi^2 + A_s z^2 \biggr]
+ \frac{A_{\ell \ell}}{2} \biggl[\varpi^4\biggr]
+ \frac{1}{2} \biggl[ A_{ss}z^4 \biggr]
+ \biggl[ A_{\ell s} \varpi^2 z^2 \biggr]
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{ \Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\mathbf{x})}{(-\pi G\rho_c a_\ell^2)}</math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2} I_\mathrm{BT}
- \biggl[A_\ell \biggl(\frac{\varpi^2}{a_\ell^2}\biggr) + A_s \biggl( \frac{z^2}{a_\ell^2}\biggr) \biggr]
+ \frac{1}{2} \biggl[
A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2 \biggl(\frac{\varpi^4}{a_\ell^4}\biggr)
+ A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \biggl(\frac{z^4}{a_\ell^4}\biggr)
+ 2A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \biggl( \frac{\varpi^2 z^2}{a_\ell^4}\biggr)
\biggr]
\, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
====Index Symbol Expressions====
The expression for the zeroth-order normalization term <math>(I_{BT})</math>, and the relevant pair of 1<sup>st</sup>-order index symbol expressions are:
<table align="center" border=0 cellpadding="3">
<tr>
<td align="right"><math>I_\mathrm{BT}</math> </td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math> </td>
<td align="left">
<math>
2A_\ell + A_s (1-e^2) = 2 (1-e^2)^{1/2} \biggl[ \frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e} \biggr] \, ;
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>
A_\ell
</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>
=
</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{e^2} \biggl[ \frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e} - (1-e^2)^{1/2} \biggr] (1-e^2)^{1/2} \, ;
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right"><math>A_s</math> </td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math> </td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{2}{e^2} \biggl[ (1-e^2)^{-1/2} - \frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e} \biggr] (1-e^2)^{1 / 2} \, ,
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<div align="center">
[<b>[[Appendix/References#EFE|<font color="red">EFE</font>]]</b>], <font color="#00CC00">Chapter 3, Eq. (36)</font><br />
[<b>[[Appendix/References#T78|<font color="red">T78</font>]]</b>], <font color="#00CC00">§4.5, Eqs. (48) & (49)</font>
</div>
where the eccentricity,
<div align="center">
<math>
e \equiv \biggl[1 - \biggl(\frac{a_s}{a_\ell}\biggr)^2 \biggr]^{1 / 2} \, .
</math>
</div>
The relevant [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/HomogeneousEllipsoids#Index_Symbols_of_the_2nd_Order|2<sup>nd</sup>-order index symbol]] expressions are:
<table align="center" border=0 cellpadding="3">
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>
a_\ell^2 A_{\ell \ell}
</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>
=
</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{4e^4}\biggl\{- (3 + 2e^2) (1-e^2)+3 (1 - e^2)^{1 / 2} \biggl[\frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e}\biggr] \biggr\}
\, ;
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\frac{3}{2} a_\ell^2 A_{ss} </math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{( 4e^2 - 3 )}{e^4(1-e^2)}
+
\frac{3 (1-e^2)^{1 / 2}}{e^4} \biggl[\frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e}\biggr]
\, ;
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>
a_\ell^2 A_{\ell s}
</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>
=
</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{ e^4} \biggl\{
(3-e^2)
-
3 (1-e^2)^{1 / 2} \biggl[\frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e}\biggr]
\biggr\} \, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
We can crosscheck this last expression by [[ParabolicDensity/GravPot#Parabolic_Density_Distribution_2|drawing on a shortcut expression]],
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>A_{\ell s}</math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
- \frac{A_\ell - A_s}{(a_\ell^2 - a_s^2)}
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~ a_\ell^2 A_{\ell s}</math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{e^2}\biggl\{
A_s - A_\ell
\biggr\}
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{e^2}\biggl\{
\frac{2}{e^2} \biggl[ (1-e^2)^{-1/2} - \frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e} \biggr] (1-e^2)^{1 / 2}
-
\frac{1}{e^2} \biggl[ \frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e} - (1-e^2)^{1/2} \biggr] (1-e^2)^{1/2}
\biggr\}
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{e^4}\biggl\{
\biggl[ 2 - 2(1-e^2)^{1 / 2} \frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e} \biggr]
-
\biggl[ (1-e^2)^{1/2} \frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e} - (1-e^2) \biggr]
\biggr\}
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{e^4}\biggl\{(3-e^2) - 3(1-e^2)^{1 / 2} \frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e} \biggr\}
\, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
====Meridional Plane Equi-Potential Contours====
Here, we follow closely our separate discussion of equipotential surfaces for [[Apps/MaclaurinSpheroids#norotation|Maclaurin Spheroids, assuming no rotation]].
=====Configuration Surface=====
In the meridional <math>(\varpi, z)</math> plane, the surface of this oblate-spheroidal configuration — identified by the thick, solid-black curve below, in Figure 1 — is defined by the expression,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\frac{\rho}{\rho_c} </math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>=</math>
</td>
<td align="left" colspan="2">
<math>1 - \biggl[\frac{\varpi^2}{a_\ell^2} + \frac{z^2}{a_s^2} \biggr] = 0</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{\varpi^2}{a_\ell^2} + \frac{z^2}{a_s^2}</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>=</math>
</td>
<td align="left" colspan="2">
<math>1 </math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~ z^2</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>=</math>
</td>
<td align="left" colspan="2">
<math>a_s^2\biggl[1 - \frac{\varpi^2}{a_\ell^2} \biggr] = a_\ell^2 (1-e^2) \biggl[1 - \frac{\varpi^2}{a_\ell^2} \biggr]</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{z}{a_\ell}</math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>=</math>
</td>
<td align="left">
<math>\pm ~(1-e^2)^{1 / 2} \biggl[1 - \frac{\varpi^2}{a_\ell^2} \biggr]^{1 / 2} \, ,</math>
</td>
<td align="right"> for <math>~0 \le \frac{| \varpi |}{a_\ell} \le 1 \, .</math></td>
</tr>
</table>
=====Expression for Gravitational Potential=====
Throughout the interior of this configuration, each associated <math>~\Phi_\mathrm{eff}</math> = constant, equipotential surface is defined by the expression,
<!--
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\phi_\mathrm{choice} \equiv \frac{\Phi_\mathrm{eff}}{\pi G \rho} + I_\mathrm{BT}a_1^2 </math>
</td>
<td align="center">
<math>=</math>
</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1">
<math>\biggl( A_1 - \frac{\omega_0^2}{2\pi G \rho}\biggr) \varpi^2 + A_3 z^2 </math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
-->
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\phi_\mathrm{choice} \equiv \frac{ \Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\mathbf{x})}{(\pi G\rho_c a_\ell^2)} + \frac{1}{2} I_\mathrm{BT}
</math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\biggl[A_\ell \biggl(\frac{\varpi^2}{a_\ell^2}\biggr) + A_s \biggl( \frac{z^2}{a_\ell^2}\biggr) \biggr]
- \frac{1}{2} \biggl[
A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2 \biggl(\frac{\varpi^4}{a_\ell^4}\biggr)
+ A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \biggl(\frac{z^4}{a_\ell^4}\biggr)
+ 2A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \biggl( \frac{\varpi^2 z^2}{a_\ell^4}\biggr)
\biggr]
\, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
Letting,
<div align="center"><math>\zeta \equiv \frac{z^2}{a_\ell^2}</math>,</div>
we can rewrite this expression for <math>\phi_\mathrm{choice}</math> as,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\phi_\mathrm{choice} </math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
A_\ell \biggl(\frac{\varpi^2}{a_\ell^2}\biggr) + A_s \zeta
- \frac{1}{2} A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2 \biggl(\frac{\varpi^4}{a_\ell^4}\biggr)
- \frac{1}{2} A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2
- A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \biggl( \frac{\varpi^2 }{a_\ell^2}\biggr)\zeta
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
- \frac{1}{2} A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2
+ \biggl[ A_s - A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \biggl( \frac{\varpi^2 }{a_\ell^2}\biggr)\biggr]\zeta
+
A_\ell \biggl(\frac{\varpi^2}{a_\ell^2}\biggr)
- \frac{1}{2} A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2 \biggl(\frac{\varpi^4}{a_\ell^4}\biggr)
\, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
=====Potential at the Pole=====
At the pole, <math>(\varpi, z) = (0, a_s)</math>. Hence,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\phi_\mathrm{choice}\biggr|_\mathrm{mid} </math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
- \frac{1}{2} A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \biggl(\frac{a_s^2}{a_\ell^2}\biggr)^2
+ \biggl[ A_s - A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \cancelto{0}{\biggl( \frac{\varpi^2 }{a_\ell^2}\biggr)}\biggr]\biggl(\frac{a_s^2}{a_\ell^2}\biggr)
+
A_\ell \cancelto{0}{\biggl(\frac{\varpi^2}{a_\ell^2}\biggr)}
- \frac{1}{2} A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2 \cancelto{0}{\biggl(\frac{\varpi^4}{a_\ell^4}\biggr)}
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
A_s \biggl(\frac{a_s^2}{a_\ell^2}\biggr)
- \frac{1}{2} A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \biggl(\frac{a_s^2}{a_\ell^2}\biggr)^2 \, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
=====General Determination of Vertical Coordinate (ζ)=====
<table border="1" align="center" cellpadding="8" width="80%"><tr><td align="left">
Given values of the three parameters, <math>e</math>, <math>\varpi</math>, and <math>\phi_\mathrm{choice}</math>, this last expression can be viewed as a quadratic equation for <math>\zeta</math>. Specifically,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>0</math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\alpha \zeta^2 + \beta\zeta + \gamma \, ,
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
where,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\alpha</math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>\equiv</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2} A_{ss} a_\ell^2
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{3}\biggl\{
\frac{( 4e^2 - 3 )}{e^4(1-e^2)}
+
\frac{3 (1-e^2)^{1 / 2}}{e^4} \biggl[\frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e}\biggr]
\biggr\}
\, ,
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\beta</math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>\equiv</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \biggl( \frac{\varpi^2 }{a_\ell^2}\biggr) - A_s
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{e^4}\biggl\{(3-e^2) - 3(1-e^2)^{1 / 2} \frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e} \biggr\}
\biggl( \frac{\varpi^2 }{a_\ell^2}\biggr)
-
\frac{2}{e^2} \biggl[ (1-e^2)^{-1/2} - \frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e} \biggr] (1-e^2)^{1 / 2}
\, ,
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\gamma</math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>\equiv</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\phi_\mathrm{choice}
+
\frac{1}{2} A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2 \biggl(\frac{\varpi^4}{a_\ell^4}\biggr)
-
A_\ell \biggl(\frac{\varpi^2}{a_\ell^2}\biggr)
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\phi_\mathrm{choice}
+
\frac{1}{8e^4}\biggl\{- (3 + 2e^2) (1-e^2)+3 (1 - e^2)^{1 / 2} \biggl[\frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e}\biggr] \biggr\}\biggl(\frac{\varpi^4}{a_\ell^4}\biggr)
-
\frac{1}{e^2} \biggl[ \frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e} - (1-e^2)^{1/2} \biggr] (1-e^2)^{1 / 2} \biggl(\frac{\varpi^2}{a_\ell^2}\biggr)
\, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
The solution of this quadratic equation gives,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\zeta</math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2\alpha}\biggl\{ - \beta \pm \biggl[\beta^2 - 4\alpha\gamma \biggr]^{1 / 2}\biggr\}
\, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
Should we adopt the ''superior'' (positive) sign, or is it more physically reasonable to adopt the ''inferior'' (negative) sign? As it turns out, <math>\beta</math> is intrinsically negative, so the quantity, <math>-\beta</math>, is positive. Furthermore, when <math>\gamma</math> goes to zero, we need <math>\zeta</math> to go to zero as well. This will only happen if we adopt the ''inferior'' (negative) sign. Hence, the physically sensible root of this quadratic relation is given by the expression,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\zeta</math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2\alpha}\biggl\{ - \beta - \biggl[\beta^2 - 4\alpha\gamma \biggr]^{1 / 2}\biggr\}
\, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<!--
Given that in this physical system, <math>\zeta = z^2/a_\ell^2</math> must be positive, we must choose the superior root. We conclude therefore that,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\frac{z^2}{a_\ell^2}</math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2\alpha}\biggl\{ \biggl[\beta^2 - 4\alpha\gamma \biggr]^{1 / 2} - \beta \biggr\}
\, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<font color="red">But check this statement because it appears that <math>\beta</math> will sometimes be negative.</font>
-->
</td></tr></table>
<span id="QuantitativeExample">Here we present a quantitatively accurate depiction</span> of the shape of the (Ferrers) gravitational potential that arises from oblate-spheroidal configurations having a parabolic density distribution. We closely follow the discussion of [[Apps/MaclaurinSpheroids#Example_Equi-gravitational-potential_Contours|equi-gravitational potential contours that arise in (uniform-density) Maclaurin spheroids]]. In order to facilitate comparison with Maclaurin spheroids, we will focus on a model with …
<table border="0" align="center" width="80%">
<tr>
<td align="center"><math>\frac{a_s}{a_\ell} = 0.582724 \, ,</math></td>
<td align="center"><math>e = 0.81267 \, ,</math></td>
<td align="center"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center"><math>A_\ell = A_m = 0.51589042 \, ,</math></td>
<td align="center"><math>A_s = 0.96821916 \, ,</math></td>
<td align="center"><math>I_\mathrm{BT} = 1.360556 \, ,</math></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center"><math>a_\ell^2 A_{\ell \ell} = 0.3287756 \, ,</math></td>
<td align="center"><math>a_\ell^2 A_{s s} = 1.5066848 \, ,</math></td>
<td align="center"><math>a_\ell^2 A_{\ell s} = 0.6848975 \, .</math></td>
</tr>
</table>
[<font color="red">NOTE:</font> Along the Maclaurin spheroid sequence, this is the eccentricity that marks bifurcation to the Jacobi ellipsoid sequence — see the first model listed in Table IV (p. 103) of [<b>[[Appendix/References#EFE|<font color="red">EFE</font>]]</b>] and/or see Tables 1 and 2 of [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/JacobiEllipsoids|our discussion of the Jacobi ellipsoid sequence]]. It is unlikely that this same eccentricity has a comparably special physical relevance along the sequence of spheroids having parabolic density distributions.]
The largest value of the gravitational potential that will arise inside (actually, on the surface) of the configuration is at <math>(\varpi, z) = (1, 0)</math>. That is, when,
<!--
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\alpha</math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>\equiv</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2} A_{ss} a_\ell^2
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\beta</math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>\equiv</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 - A_s
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\gamma</math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>\equiv</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\phi_\mathrm{choice}
+
\frac{1}{2} A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2
-
A_\ell
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
-->
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\phi_\mathrm{choice}\biggr|_\mathrm{max} </math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
A_\ell
- \frac{1}{2} A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2 = 0.3515026 \, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
So we will plot various equipotential surfaces having, <math>0 < \phi_\mathrm{choice} < \phi_\mathrm{choice}|_\mathrm{max} </math>, recognizing that they will each cut through the equatorial plane <math>(z = 0)</math> at the radial coordinate given by,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\phi_\mathrm{choice} </math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
- \frac{1}{2} A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \cancelto{0}{\zeta^2}
+ \biggl[ A_s - A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \biggl( \frac{\varpi^2 }{a_\ell^2}\biggr)\biggr]\cancelto{0}{\zeta}
+
A_\ell \biggl(\frac{\varpi^2}{a_\ell^2}\biggr)
- \frac{1}{2} A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2 \biggl(\frac{\varpi^4}{a_\ell^4}\biggr)
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~ 0</math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2} A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2 \chi^2
- A_\ell \chi
+ \phi_\mathrm{choice} \, ,
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
where,
<div align="center"><math>\chi \equiv \frac{\varpi^2}{a_\ell^2} \, .</math></div>
The solution to this quadratic equation gives,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
<td align="right">
<math>\chi_\mathrm{eqplane} </math>
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2}\biggl\{
A_\ell \pm \biggl[A_\ell^2 - 2A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2 \phi_\mathrm{choice}\biggr]^{1 / 2}
\biggr\}
</math>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right">
</td>
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
<td align="left">
<math>
\frac{A_\ell}{A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2}\biggl\{
1 - \biggl[1 - \frac{2A_{\ell \ell} a_\ell^2 \phi_\mathrm{choice}}{A_\ell^2}\biggr]^{1 / 2}
\biggr\}
\, .
</math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
Note that, again, the physically relevant root is obtained by adopting the ''inferior'' (negative) sign, as has been done in this last expression.
=====Equipotential Contours that Lie Entirely Within Configuration=====
For all <math>0 < \phi_\mathrm{choice} \le \phi_\mathrm{choice} |_\mathrm{mid}</math>, the equipotential contour will reside entirely within the configuration. In this case, for a given <math>\phi_\mathrm{choice}</math>, we can plot points along the contour by picking (equally spaced?) values of <math>\chi_\mathrm{eqplane} \ge \chi \ge 0</math>, then solve the above quadratic equation for the corresponding value of <math>\zeta</math>.
In our example configuration, this means … (to be finished)
===Tentative Summary===
===Tentative Summary===
Parabolic Density Distribution
Axisymmetric (Oblate) Equilibrium Structures
Tentative Summary
Known Relations
Density:
ρ ( ϖ , z ) ρ c
=
[ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] ,
Gravitational Potential:
Φ g r a v ( ϖ , z ) ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 I B T − A ℓ χ 2 − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 [ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) χ 4 ] .
Specific Angular Momentum:
j 2 ( π G ρ c a ℓ 4 ) ⋅ 1 χ 3
=
2 A ℓ χ − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 3 .
Centrifugal Potential:
Ψ ( π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 [ A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 4 − 2 A ℓ χ 2 ] .
Enthalpy:
[ H ( χ , ζ ) − C B ( π G ρ c a ℓ 2 ) ] − 1 2 I B T
=
− A s ζ 2 + ζ 2 2 [ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 3 χ 2 ) + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 χ 2 ] .
Vertical Pressure Gradient:
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ P ∂ ζ
=
ρ ρ c ⋅ [ 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 ζ − 2 A s ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ]
Radial Pressure Gradient:
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ P ∂ χ
=
ρ ρ c ⋅ { 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 χ }
where, χ ≡ ϖ / a ℓ and ζ ≡ z / a ℓ , and the relevant index symbol expressions are:
I B T
=
2 A ℓ + A s ( 1 − e 2 ) = 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 [ sin − 1 e e ] ;
A ℓ
=
1 e 2 [ sin − 1 e e − ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 ;
A s
=
2 e 2 [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 / 2 − sin − 1 e e ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 ;
a ℓ 2 A ℓ ℓ
=
1 4 e 4 { − ( 3 + 2 e 2 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) + 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 [ sin − 1 e e ] } ;
3 2 a ℓ 2 A s s
=
( 4 e 2 − 3 ) e 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) + 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 e 4 [ sin − 1 e e ] ;
a ℓ 2 A ℓ s
=
1 e 4 { ( 3 − e 2 ) − 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 [ sin − 1 e e ] } ,
where the eccentricity,
6th Try
Euler Equation
From, for example, here we can write the,
Eulerian Representation
of the Euler Equation,
∂ v → ∂ t + ( v → ⋅ ∇ ) v → = − 1 ρ ∇ P − ∇ Φ
In steady-state, we should set ∂ v → / ∂ t = 0 . There are various ways of expressing the nonlinear term on the LHS; from here , for example, we find,
( v → ⋅ ∇ ) v → = 1 2 ∇ ( v → ⋅ v → ) − v → × ( ∇ × v → ) = 1 2 ∇ ( v 2 ) + ζ → × v → ,
where,
is commonly referred to as the vorticity .
Axisymmetric Configurations
From, for example, here , we appreciate that, quite generally, for axisymmetric systems when written in cylindrical coordinates,
( v → ⋅ ∇ ) v →
=
e ^ ϖ [ v ϖ ∂ v ϖ ∂ ϖ + v z ∂ v ϖ ∂ z − v φ v φ ϖ ] + e ^ φ [ v ϖ ∂ v φ ∂ ϖ + v z ∂ v φ ∂ z + v φ v ϖ ϖ ] + e ^ z [ v ϖ ∂ v z ∂ ϖ + v z ∂ v z ∂ z ] .
We seek steady-state configurations for which v ϖ = 0 and v z = 0 , in which case this expression simplifies considerably to,
( v → ⋅ ∇ ) v →
=
e ^ ϖ [ − v φ v φ ϖ ]
=
e ^ ϖ [ − j 2 ϖ 3 ] ,
where, in this last expression we have replaced v φ with the specific angular momentum, j ≡ ϖ v φ = ( ϖ 2 φ ˙ ) , which is a conserved quantity in dynamically evolving systems . NOTE: Up to this point in our discussion, j can be a function of both coordinates, that is, j = j ( ϖ , z ) .
As has been highlighted here for example — for the axisymmetric configurations under consideration — the e ^ ϖ and e ^ z components of the Euler equation become, respectively,
e ^ ϖ :
− j 2 ϖ 3
=
− [ 1 ρ ∂ P ∂ ϖ + ∂ Φ ∂ ϖ ]
e ^ z :
0
=
− [ 1 ρ ∂ P ∂ z + ∂ Φ ∂ z ]
7th Try
Introduction
Density:
ρ ( χ , ζ ) ρ c
=
[ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] ,
Gravitational Potential:
Φ g r a v ( χ , ζ ) ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 I B T − A ℓ χ 2 − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 [ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) χ 4 ] .
Specific Angular Momentum:
j 2 ( π G ρ c a ℓ 4 ) ⋅ 1 χ 3
=
2 j 1 χ − 2 j 3 χ 3 .
Centrifugal Potential:
Ψ ( π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 [ j 3 χ 4 − 2 j 1 χ 2 ] .
From above , we recall the following relations:
4 e 4 ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 )
=
− ( 3 + 2 e 2 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) + Υ ;
3 2 e 4 ( A s s a ℓ 2 )
=
( 4 e 2 − 3 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) + Υ ;
e 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 )
=
( 3 − e 2 ) − Υ .
where,
Crosscheck … Given that,
we obtain the pair of relations,
4 e 4 ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 )
=
− ( 3 + 2 e 2 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) + ( 3 − e 2 ) − e 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 )
=
− ( 3 − 3 e 2 + 2 e 2 − 2 e 4 ) + ( 3 − e 2 ) − e 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 )
=
2 e 4 − e 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 )
⇒ ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 − 1 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ;
3 2 e 4 ( A s s a ℓ 2 )
=
( 4 e 2 − 3 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) + ( 3 − e 2 ) − e 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 )
=
( 4 e 2 − 3 ) + ( 3 − e 2 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) − e 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 )
=
e 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) − e 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 )
⇒ ( A s s a ℓ 2 )
=
2 3 [ 1 ( 1 − e 2 ) − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] .
RHS Square Brackets (TERM1)
Let's rewrite the term inside square brackets on the RHS of the expression for the gravitational potential.
[ ] R H S
≡
[ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) χ 4 ]
=
e − 4 { 2 3 [ ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) + Υ ] ζ 4 + 2 [ ( 3 − e 2 ) − Υ ] χ 2 ζ 2 + 1 4 [ − ( 3 + 2 e 2 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) + Υ ] χ 4 }
=
e − 4 { 2 3 [ ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) ] ζ 4 + 2 [ ( 3 − e 2 ) ] χ 2 ζ 2 + 1 4 [ − ( 3 + 2 e 2 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) ] χ 4 + 2 3 [ ζ 4 − 3 ζ 2 χ 2 + 3 8 χ 4 ] Υ }
=
− e − 4 { 2 3 [ ( 3 − 4 e 2 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) ] ζ 4 − 2 [ ( 3 − e 2 ) ] χ 2 ζ 2 + 1 4 [ ( 3 + 2 e 2 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) ] χ 4 }
+ e − 4 { 2 3 [ ( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ) − 1 3 8 χ 4 ] Υ }
=
− e − 4 2 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) { [ ( 3 − 4 e 2 ) ] ζ 4 − 3 [ ( 3 − e 2 ) ] ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + 3 8 [ ( 3 + 2 e 2 ) ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 }
+ e − 4 { 2 3 [ ( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ) − 1 3 8 χ 4 ] Υ }
=
− 2 e − 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) { ζ 4 − 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + 3 8 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 } + 8 e − 2 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) { ζ 4 − 3 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 − 3 1 6 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 }
+ 2 e − 4 3 [ ( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ) − 1 3 8 χ 4 ] Υ
=
− 2 e − 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) { [ ζ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] [ ζ 2 − 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] − 1 3 8 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 ⏟ − 0 . 0 3 8 8 5 5 } + 8 e − 2 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) { [ ζ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] [ ζ 2 + 1 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] + 1 1 6 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 ⏞ − 0 . 0 1 0 1 2 4 }
+ 2 e − 4 3 [ ( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ) − 1 3 8 χ 4 ⏟ − 0 . 0 6 1 6 0 8 ] Υ
=
0 . 2 1 2 1 1 9 0 1 4
(example #1 , below) .
Check #1:
( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ) − 1 3 8 χ 4
=
ζ 4 − 3 χ 2 ζ 2 + 2 χ 4 − 1 3 8 χ 4
=
ζ 4 − 3 χ 2 ζ 2 + 3 8 χ 4 .
Check #2:
( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 + 1 4 χ 2 ) + 1 1 6 χ 4
=
ζ 4 − 3 4 χ 2 ζ 2 − 1 4 χ 4 + 1 1 6 χ 4
=
ζ 4 − 3 4 χ 2 ζ 2 − 3 1 6 χ 4
RHS Quadratic Terms (TERM2)
The quadratic terms on the RHS can be rewritten as,
A ℓ χ 2 + A s ζ 2
=
{ 1 e 2 [ sin − 1 e e − ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 } χ 2 + { 2 e 2 [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 / 2 − sin − 1 e e ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 } ζ 2
=
{ 1 e 2 [ ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 sin − 1 e e − ( 1 − e 2 ) ] } χ 2 + { 2 e 2 [ 1 − ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 sin − 1 e e ] } ζ 2
=
{ 1 3 e 2 [ Υ − 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) ] } χ 2 + { 2 3 e 2 [ 3 − Υ ] } ζ 2
=
( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 [ χ 2 − 2 ζ 2 ] + χ 2
=
( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 ( χ + 2 ζ ) ( χ − 2 ζ ) + χ 2
T E R M 2
=
0 . 4 0 1 1 5 0
(example #1 , below) .
where, again,
Υ
≡
3 ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 [ sin − 1 e e ] = 2 . 0 4 0 8 3 5 .
Gravitational Potential Rewritten
In summary, then,
Φ g r a v ( χ , ζ ) ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 I B T − A ℓ χ 2 − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 [ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) χ 4 ]
=
1 3 Υ − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 ( χ + 2 ζ ) ( χ − 2 ζ ) − χ 2
− e − 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) { [ ζ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] [ ζ 2 − 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] − 1 3 8 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 } + 4 e − 2 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) { [ ζ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] [ ζ 2 + 1 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] + 1 1 6 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 }
+ e − 4 3 [ ( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ) − 1 3 8 χ 4 ] Υ
=
1 3 Υ − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 ( χ + 2 ζ ) ( χ − 2 ζ ) − χ 2 + 4 3 e 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) { [ ζ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] [ ζ 2 + 1 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] + 1 1 6 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 }
− 1 e 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) { [ ζ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] [ ζ 2 − 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] − 1 3 8 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 } + 1 3 e 4 [ ( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ) − 1 3 8 χ 4 ] Υ
=
1 3 Υ − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 ( χ + 2 ζ ) ( χ − 2 ζ ) + 4 3 e 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) { [ ζ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] [ ζ 2 + 1 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] }
− 1 e 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) { [ ζ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] [ ζ 2 − 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] } + Υ 3 e 4 [ ( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ) ]
− χ 2 + 4 3 e 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) { 1 1 6 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 } + 1 e 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) { 1 3 8 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 } − Υ 3 e 4 { 1 3 8 χ 4 }
=
1 3 Υ − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 ( χ + 2 ζ ) ( χ − 2 ζ ) + 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 2 { [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 2 − χ 2 ] [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 2 + 1 4 χ 2 ] }
− ( 1 − e 2 ) e 4 { [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 2 − χ 2 ] [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ] } + Υ 3 e 4 [ ( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ) ]
− χ 2 + { ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 2 e 2 + 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) 8 e 4 − 1 3 Υ 2 4 e 4 } χ 4 .
=
0.767874 (row 1) + 0.5678833 (row 2) - 0.950574 (row 3)
=
0.3851876 .
Example Evaluation
Let's evaluate these expressions, borrowing from the quantitative example specified above . Specifically, we choose,
a s a ℓ = 0 . 5 8 2 7 2 4 ,
e = 0 . 8 1 2 6 7 ,
A ℓ = A m = 0 . 5 1 5 8 9 0 4 2 ,
A s = 0 . 9 6 8 2 1 9 1 6 ,
I B T = 2 3 Υ = 1 . 3 6 0 5 5 6 ,
a ℓ 2 A ℓ ℓ = 0 . 3 2 8 7 7 5 6 ,
a ℓ 2 A s s = 1 . 5 0 6 6 8 4 8 ,
a ℓ 2 A ℓ s = 0 . 6 8 4 8 9 7 5 .
Also, let's set ρ / ρ c = 0 . 1 and χ = χ 1 = 0 . 7 5 ⇒ χ 1 2 = 0 . 5 6 2 5 . This means that,
ζ 1 2
=
( 1 − e 2 ) [ 1 − χ 2 − ρ ( χ , ζ ) ρ c ] = [ 1 − ( 0 . 8 1 2 6 7 ) 2 ) ] [ 1 − 0 . 5 6 2 5 − 0 . 1 ] = 0 . 1 1 4 6 0
⇒ ζ 1
=
0 . 3 3 8 5 3 .
So, let's evaluate the gravitational potential …
Φ g r a v ( χ 1 , ζ 1 ) ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 I B T − [ A ℓ χ 2 + A s ζ 2 ⏞ T E R M 2 ] + 1 2 [ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) χ 4 ⏟ T E R M 1 ] = 0 . 3 8 5 1 8 7 3 7 2
T E R M 1
=
0 . 0 1 9 7 8 8 9 2 1 + 0 . 0 8 8 3 0 3 5 0 9 + 0 . 1 0 4 0 2 6 6 5 5 = 0 . 2 1 2 1 1 9 0 8 5
T E R M 2
=
0 . 2 9 0 1 8 8 3 6 1 + 0 . 1 1 0 9 6 1 8 0 9 = 0 . 4 0 1 1 5 0 1 7 1 .
Replace ζ With Normalized Density
First, let's readjust the last, 3-row expression for the gravitational potential so that ζ 2 can be readily replaced with the normalized density.
Φ g r a v ( χ , ζ ) ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 3 Υ − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 ( χ 2 − 2 ζ 2 ) + 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 2 { [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 2 − χ 2 ] [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 2 + 1 4 χ 2 ] }
− ( 1 − e 2 ) e 4 { [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 2 − χ 2 ] [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ] } + Υ 3 e 4 [ ( ζ 2 − χ 2 ) ( ζ 2 − 2 χ 2 ) ]
− χ 2 + 1 2 4 e 4 { 2 e 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) + 3 9 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 3 Υ } χ 4 .
Now make the substitution,
where,
We have,
Φ g r a v ( χ , ζ ) ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 3 Υ − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 { χ 2 − 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) [ 1 − χ 2 − ρ * ] } + 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 2 { [ 1 − χ 2 − ρ * ] − χ 2 } { [ 1 − χ 2 − ρ * ] + 1 4 χ 2 }
− ( 1 − e 2 ) e 4 { [ 1 − χ 2 − ρ * ] − χ 2 } { [ 1 − χ 2 − ρ * ] − 2 χ 2 } + Υ 3 e 4 { ( 1 − e 2 ) [ 1 − χ 2 − ρ * ] − χ 2 } { ( 1 − e 2 ) [ 1 − χ 2 − ρ * ] − 2 χ 2 }
− χ 2 + 1 2 4 e 4 { 2 e 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) + 3 9 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 3 Υ } χ 4
=
1 3 Υ − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 { − 2 + 2 e 2 + ( 3 − 2 e 2 ) χ 2 + ( 2 − 2 e 2 ) ρ * } + 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 2 { 1 − 2 χ 2 − ρ * } { 1 − 3 4 χ 2 − ρ * }
− ( 1 − e 2 ) e 4 { 1 − 2 χ 2 − ρ * } { 1 − 3 χ 2 − ρ * } + Υ 3 e 4 { ( 1 − e 2 ) − ( 2 − e 2 ) χ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) ρ * } { ( 1 − e 2 ) − ( 3 − e 2 ) χ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) ρ * }
− χ 2 + 1 2 4 e 4 { 3 9 − 3 7 e 2 − 2 e 4 − 1 3 Υ } χ 4
=
1 3 Υ − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 { − 2 + 3 χ 2 + 2 ρ * + 2 e 2 [ 1 − χ 2 − ρ * ] } + 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 2 { 1 − 2 χ 2 − ρ * } { 1 − 3 4 χ 2 − ρ * }
− ( 1 − e 2 ) e 4 { 1 − 2 χ 2 − ρ * } { 1 − 3 χ 2 − ρ * } + { Υ 3 e 4 [ 1 − 2 χ 2 − ρ * ] + Υ 3 e 2 [ − 1 + χ 2 + ρ * ] } { ( 1 − e 2 ) − ( 3 − e 2 ) χ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) ρ * }
− χ 2 + 1 2 4 e 4 { 3 9 − 3 7 e 2 − 2 e 4 − 1 3 Υ } χ 4 .
=
0.767874 (row 1) + 0.5678833 (row 2) - 0.950574 (row 3)
=
0.3851876 .
Now, let's group together like terms and examine, in particular, whether the coefficient of the cross-product, χ 2 ρ * ) , goes to zero.
Φ g r a v ( χ , ζ ) ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 3 Υ − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 { 2 e 2 − 2 + ( 2 − 2 e 2 ) ρ * }
+ [ 1 − 2 χ 2 − ρ * ] { 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 2 [ 1 − 3 4 χ 2 − ρ * ] − ( 1 − e 2 ) e 4 [ 1 − 3 χ 2 − ρ * ] + [ Υ 3 e 4 − Υ 3 e 2 ] [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − ( 3 − e 2 ) χ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) ρ * ] }
− { Υ 3 e 2 } [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − ( 3 − e 2 ) χ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) ρ * ] χ 2
− χ 2 + 1 2 4 e 4 { 3 9 − 3 7 e 2 − 2 e 4 − 1 3 Υ } χ 4 − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 { 3 χ 2 − 2 e 2 χ 2 }
=
1 3 Υ + ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 { 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ( 1 − ρ * ) }
+ [ 1 − 2 χ 2 − ρ * ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 4 { 4 e 2 [ 1 − 3 4 χ 2 − ρ * ] − 3 [ 1 − 3 χ 2 − ρ * ] + Υ [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − ( 3 − e 2 ) χ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) ρ * ] }
+ { Υ 3 e 2 } [ ( 1 − e 2 ) ρ * ] χ 2
− χ 2 + 1 2 4 e 4 { 3 9 − 3 7 e 2 − 2 e 4 − 1 3 Υ } χ 4 − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 { 3 χ 2 − 2 e 2 χ 2 } − { Υ 3 e 2 } [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − ( 3 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] χ 2
=
1 3 Υ + ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 { 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ( 1 − ρ * ) }
+ [ ( 1 − ρ * ) ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 4 { [ 4 e 2 − 3 + Υ ( 1 − e 2 ) ] ( 1 − ρ * ) } + [ − 2 χ 2 ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 4 { [ 4 e 2 − 3 + Υ ( 1 − e 2 ) ] ( 1 − ρ * ) }
+ [ ( 1 − ρ * ) ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 4 { [ − 3 e 2 + 9 − ( 3 − e 2 ) Υ ] χ 2 } + [ − 2 χ 2 ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 4 { [ − 3 e 2 + 9 − ( 3 − e 2 ) Υ ] χ 2 }
+ [ Υ ( 1 − e 2 ) 3 e 2 ] ρ * χ 2
− χ 2 + 1 2 4 e 4 { 3 9 − 3 7 e 2 − 2 e 4 − 1 3 Υ } χ 4 − ( Υ − 3 ) 3 e 2 { 3 χ 2 − 2 e 2 χ 2 } − { Υ 3 e 2 } [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − ( 3 − e 2 ) χ 2 ] χ 2
8th Try
Foundation
Density:
ρ * ≡ ρ ( χ , ζ ) ρ c
=
[ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] ,
Gravitational Potential:
Φ g r a v ( χ , ζ ) ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 I B T − A ℓ χ 2 − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 [ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) χ 4 ] .
Complete the Square
Again, let's rewrite the term inside square brackets on the RHS of the expression for the gravitational potential,
[ ] R H S
≡
[ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) χ 4 ] ,
in such a way that we effectively "complete the square." Assuming that the desired expression takes the form,
[ ] R H S
=
[ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 ζ 2 + B χ 2 ] [ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 ζ 2 + C χ 2 ]
=
( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 ( B + C ) ζ 2 χ 2 + B C χ 4 ,
we see that we must have,
( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 ( B + C )
=
2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 )
⇒ B
=
2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 − C ;
and we must also have,
B C
=
( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 )
⇒ B
=
( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) C .
Hence,
( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) C
=
2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 − C
⇒ 0
=
C 2 − 2 [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 ] C + ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) .
The pair of roots of this quadratic expression are,
C ±
=
[ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 ] ± 1 2 { 4 [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2 ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ] − 4 ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) } 1 / 2
=
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 { 1 ± [ 1 − ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2 ] 1 / 2 }
⇒ C ± ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2
=
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) { 1 ± [ 1 − ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2 ] 1 / 2 } .
Also, then,
B ± ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2
=
2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) − C ± ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2
=
2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) { 1 ± [ 1 − ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2 ] 1 / 2 }
=
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) { 1 ∓ [ 1 − ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2 ] 1 / 2 } .
NOTE: Given that ,
( A s s a ℓ 2 )
=
2 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 2 3 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 )
and,
( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 − 1 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ,
we can write,
Lambda vs Eccentricity
Λ ≡ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2
=
1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2 { [ 2 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 2 3 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] [ 1 2 − 1 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] }
=
1 6 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2 { 1 ( 1 − e 2 ) [ 2 − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) [ 2 − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] }
=
1 6 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2 { [ 1 ( 1 − e 2 ) − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] [ 2 − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] }
In summary, then, we can write,
B ± ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2
=
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) [ 1 ∓ ( 1 − Λ ) 1 / 2 ]
and,
C ± ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2
=
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) [ 1 ± ( 1 − Λ ) 1 / 2 ] ,
where, as illustrated by the inset "Lambda vs Eccentricity" plot, for all values of the eccentricity ( 0 < e ≤ 1 ) , the quantity, Λ , is greater than unity. It is clear, then, that both roots of the relevant quadratic equation are complex — i.e., they have imaginary components. But that's okay because the coefficients that appear in the right-hand-side, bracketed quartic expression appear in the combinations,
( B C ) ±
=
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2 ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) [ 1 − ( 1 − Λ ) 1 / 2 ] [ 1 + ( 1 − Λ ) 1 / 2 ] = ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) 2 ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) [ Λ ] = ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) ,
( B + C ) ±
=
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 [ 1 ∓ ( 1 − Λ ) 1 / 2 ] + ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 [ 1 ± ( 1 − Λ ) 1 / 2 ] = 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) 1 / 2 ,
both of which are real.
9th Try
Starting Key Relations
Density:
ρ ( ϖ , z ) ρ c
=
[ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] ,
Gravitational Potential:
Φ g r a v ( ϖ , z ) ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 I B T − A ℓ χ 2 − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 [ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) χ 4 ] .
Vertical Pressure Gradient:
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ P ∂ ζ
=
ρ ρ c ⋅ [ 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 ζ − 2 A s ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ]
Play With Vertical Pressure Gradient
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ P ∂ ζ
=
[ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] [ 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 ζ − 2 A s ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ]
=
[ ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ] − χ 2 [ ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ] − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 [ ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ]
=
( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 − ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 4 − 2 A s χ 2 ) ζ − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 χ 2 ζ 3 − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 [ ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) ζ 3 + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 5 ]
=
[ ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) − ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 4 − 2 A s χ 2 ) ] ζ + [ 2 A s s a ℓ 2 − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) ] ζ 3 + [ − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ] ζ 5 .
Integrate over ζ gives …
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∫ [ ∂ P ∂ ζ ] d ζ
=
[ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − A s ) − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 4 − A s χ 2 ) ] ζ 2 + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 − A s s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − A s ) ] ζ 4 + 1 3 [ − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 ] ζ 6 + c o n s t
=
[ − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 + 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ζ 4 − 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 6 ] χ 0 + [ A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 + A s ζ 2 − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ] χ 2 + [ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ] χ 4 + c o n s t .
Now Play With Radial Pressure Gradient
[ 1 ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ Φ ∂ χ
=
ρ ρ c ⋅ { − 2 A ℓ χ + 1 2 [ 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 2 χ + 4 ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) χ 3 ] }
=
2 [ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) χ + A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 3 ]
=
2 [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) χ + A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 3 ] − 2 χ 2 [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) χ + A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 3 ] − 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) χ + A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 3 ]
=
2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) χ + 2 [ A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 + ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) ] χ 3 − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 5 + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 [ ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) χ − A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ζ 2 χ 3 ]
=
2 [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ] χ + 2 [ A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 + ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ] χ 3 − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 5
Add a term j 2 ∼ ( j 4 2 χ 4 + j 6 2 χ 6 ) to account for centrifugal acceleration …
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ P ∂ χ = [ 1 ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ Φ ∂ χ + j 2 χ 3 [ ρ ρ c ]
=
2 [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ] χ + 2 [ A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 + ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ] χ 3 − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 5 + j 2 χ 3 [ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
=
2 [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ] χ + 2 [ A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 + ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ] χ 3 − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 5
+ ( j 4 2 χ 4 + j 6 2 χ 6 ) χ 3 − ( j 4 2 χ 4 + j 6 2 χ 6 ) χ 3 [ χ 2 ] − ( j 4 2 χ 4 + j 6 2 χ 6 ) χ 3 [ ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
=
2 [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ] χ + 2 [ A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 + ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ] χ 3 − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 5
+ ( j 4 2 χ + j 6 2 χ 3 ) − ( j 4 2 χ + j 6 2 χ 3 ) [ ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] − ( j 4 2 χ 3 + j 6 2 χ 5 )
=
2 [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ] χ + 2 [ A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 + ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ] χ 3 − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 χ 5
− [ j 4 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 − j 4 2 ] χ − [ j 4 2 + j 6 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 − j 6 2 ] χ 3 − [ j 6 2 ] χ 5
=
[ 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) − j 4 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + j 4 2 ] χ
+ [ 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 + 2 ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) − 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − j 4 2 − j 6 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + j 6 2 ] χ 3 + [ − j 6 2 − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ] χ 5
Integrate over χ gives …
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∫ [ ∂ P ∂ χ ] d χ
=
[ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) − 1 2 j 4 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 1 2 j 4 2 ] χ 2
+ [ 1 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 + 1 2 ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − 1 4 j 4 2 − 1 4 j 6 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 1 4 j 6 2 ] χ 4 − [ 1 6 j 6 2 + 1 3 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ] χ 6
Compare Pair of Integrations
Integration over ζ
Integration over χ
χ 0
− A s ζ 2 + 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 + 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ζ 4 − 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 6
none
χ 2
A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 + A s ζ 2 − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 )
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) − 1 2 j 4 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 1 2 j 4 2
χ 4
− A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2
1 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 + 1 2 ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − 1 4 j 4 2 − 1 4 j 6 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 1 4 j 6 2
χ 6
none
− 1 6 j 6 2 − 1 3 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2
Try, j 6 2 = [ − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ] and 1 2 j 4 2 = [ A ℓ + ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 2 ] .
Integration over ζ
Integration over χ
χ 0
− A s ζ 2 + 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 + 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ζ 4 − 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 6
none
χ 2
A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 + A s ζ 2 − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 )
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) − 1 2 j 4 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 1 2 j 4 2
=
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) − [ A ℓ + ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 2 ] ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + [ A ℓ + ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 2 ]
=
2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 2 [ 1 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
χ 4
− A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2
1 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 + 1 2 ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − 1 4 j 4 2 − 1 4 [ − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ] ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 1 4 [ − 2 A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ]
=
1 4 [ 2 ( A ℓ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ) − 2 [ A ℓ + ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 2 ] ] = − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2
χ 6
none
0
What expression for j 4 2 is required in order to ensure that the χ 2 term is the same in both columns?
1 2 j 4 2 [ 1 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
=
[ A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 + A s ζ 2 − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ] − [ ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 − A ℓ ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ]
=
[ A s ζ 2 − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ] + [ ( A ℓ ) − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ ζ 2 ) + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ]
=
[ A s ζ 2 − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 + 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 ] + A ℓ [ 1 − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 2 ]
⇒ 1 2 j 4 2 [ 1 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] − A ℓ [ 1 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
=
1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + [ A s ] ζ 2 − 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 ] ζ 4
Now, considering the following three relations …
3 2 ( A s s a ℓ 2 )
=
( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ;
A s
=
A ℓ + e 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ;
e 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 )
=
2 − 3 A ℓ ;
we can write,
1 2 j 4 2 [ 1 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] − A ℓ [ 1 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
=
1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + [ A ℓ + e 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] ζ 2 − 1 3 [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] ζ 4
⇒ 3 j 4 2 [ 1 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] − 3 A ℓ [ 2 − 2 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
=
3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + 6 [ A ℓ + e 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] ζ 2 − 2 [ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 − ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) ] ζ 4
=
( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) { 2 ζ 4 + 3 ζ 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 6 e 2 ζ 2 } − 2 ζ 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 6 A ℓ ζ 2
=
− 2 ζ 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 6 A ℓ ζ 2 + [ 2 − 3 A ℓ ] { 2 ζ 4 + 3 ζ 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 6 e 2 ζ 2 } 1 e 2
=
− 2 ζ 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 − 3 A ℓ { 2 ζ 4 + 3 ζ 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 4 e 2 ζ 2 } 1 e 2 + { 4 ζ 4 + 6 ζ 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 1 2 e 2 ζ 2 } 1 e 2
⇒ 3 j 4 2 [ 1 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
=
− 2 ζ 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 3 A ℓ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 e 2 { [ 2 e 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 2 e 2 ζ 2 ] − [ 2 ζ 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) + 3 ζ 4 + 4 e 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ 2 ] } + { 4 ζ 4 + 6 ζ 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 + 1 2 e 2 ζ 2 } 1 e 2
10th Try
Repeating Key Relations
Density:
ρ ( ϖ , z ) ρ c
=
[ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] ,
Gravitational Potential:
Φ g r a v ( ϖ , z ) ( − π G ρ c a ℓ 2 )
=
1 2 I B T − A ℓ χ 2 − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 [ ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ζ 4 + 2 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ( A ℓ ℓ a ℓ 2 ) χ 4 ] .
Vertical Pressure Gradient:
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ P ∂ ζ
=
ρ ρ c ⋅ [ 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 ζ − 2 A s ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ]
From the above (9th Try) examination of the vertical pressure gradient, we determined that a reasonably good approximation for the normalized pressure throughout the configuration is given by the expression,
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∫ [ ∂ P ∂ ζ ] d ζ
=
[ − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 + 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ζ 4 − 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 6 ] χ 0 + [ A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 + A s ζ 2 − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 ) ] χ 2 + [ − A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 ] χ 4 + c o n s t .
If we set χ = 0 — that is, if we look along the vertical axis — this approximation should be particularly good, resulting in the expression,
P z ≡ { [ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∫ [ ∂ P ∂ ζ ] d ζ } χ = 0
=
P c * − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 + 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ζ 4 − 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 6 .
Note that in the limit that z → a s — that is, at the pole along the vertical (symmetry) axis where the P z should drop to zero — we should set ζ → ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 / 2 . This allows us to determine the central pressure.
P c *
=
A s ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 + 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 3
=
A s ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 2 A s ( 1 − e 2 ) + 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2
=
1 2 A s ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 6 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 .
This means that, along the vertical axis, the pressure gradient is,
P z ≡ { [ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∫ [ ∂ P ∂ ζ ] d ζ } χ = 0
=
P c * − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 + 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ζ 4 − 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 6 .
∂ P z ∂ ζ
=
− 2 A s ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ζ 3 − 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 5 .
This should match the more general "vertical pressure gradient " expression when we set, χ = 0 , that is,
{ [ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ P ∂ ζ } χ = 0
=
[ 1 − χ 2 0 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] ⋅ [ 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ χ 2 0 − 2 A s ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ]
=
[ − 2 A s ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ] + ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 [ 2 A s ζ − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ]
Yes! The expressions match!
Shift to ξ1 Coordinate
In an accompanying chapter , we defined the coordinate,
( ξ 1 a s ) 2
≡
( ϖ a ℓ ) 2 + ( z a s ) 2 = χ 2 + ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 .
Given that we want the pressure to be constant on ξ 1 surfaces, it seems plausible that ζ 2 should be replaced by ( 1 − e 2 ) ( ξ 1 / a s ) 2 = [ ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 + ζ 2 ] in the expression for P z . That is, we might expect the expression for the pressure at any point in the meridional plane to be,
P t e s t 0 1
=
P c * − A s [ ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 + ζ 2 ] 1 + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] [ ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 + ζ 2 ] 2 − 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 [ ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 + ζ 2 ] 3
=
P c * − A s [ ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 + ζ 2 ] 1 + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] [ ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ζ 4 ] − 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 [ ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 + ζ 2 ] [ ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ζ 4 ]
=
P c * − A s [ ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 + ζ 2 ] + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] [ ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 4 + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ζ 2 + ζ 4 ]
− 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 [ ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 χ 6 + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 4 ζ 2 + χ 2 ζ 4 ] − 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 [ ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 4 ζ 2 + 2 χ 2 ζ 4 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 6 ]
=
χ 0 { P c * − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ζ 4 − 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 6 } + χ 2 { − A s ( 1 − e 2 ) + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ 2 − 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 − 2 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 }
+ χ 4 { 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 − 2 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ 2 − 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ 2 } + χ 6 { − 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 }
=
χ 0 { P c * − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ζ 4 − 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 6 } + χ 2 { − A s ( 1 − e 2 ) + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ 2 − A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 }
+ χ 4 { 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 − A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ 2 } + χ 6 { − 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 }
Integration over ζ
Pressure Guess
χ 0
− A s ζ 2 + 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 + 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ζ 4 − 1 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 6
P c * − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ζ 4 − 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 6
χ 2
A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2 + A s ζ 2 − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 − 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 )
− A s ( 1 − e 2 ) + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ 2 − A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4
χ 4
− A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ζ 2
1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 − A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ 2
χ 6
none
− 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2
Compare Vertical Pressure Gradient Expressions
From our above (9th try) derivation we know that the vertical pressure gradient is given by the expression,
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ P ∂ ζ
=
[ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] [ 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 ζ − 2 A s ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ]
=
[ ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) − ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 4 − 2 A s χ 2 ) ] ζ + [ 2 A s s a ℓ 2 − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) ] ζ 3 + [ − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ] ζ 5 .
=
[ 2 A s ( χ 2 − 1 ) + 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − χ 2 ) χ 2 ] ζ + [ 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − χ 2 ) − 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 χ 2 + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ζ 3 + [ − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] ζ 5 .
By comparison, the vertical derivative of our "test01" pressure expression gives,
P t e s t 0 1
=
χ 0 { P c * − A s ζ 2 + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ζ 4 − 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 6 } + χ 2 { − A s ( 1 − e 2 ) + 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ 2 − A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 4 }
+ χ 4 { 1 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 − A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ 2 } + χ 6 { − 1 3 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 2 }
⇒ ∂ P t e s t 0 1 ∂ ζ
=
χ 0 { − 2 A s ζ + 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ζ 3 − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ζ 5 } + χ 2 { 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ − 4 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 } + χ 4 { − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ }
=
ζ 1 { − 2 A s + 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 4 } + ζ 3 { 2 [ A s s a ℓ 2 + ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] − 4 A s s a ℓ 2 χ 2 } + ζ 5 { − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 }
=
ζ 1 { 2 A s ( χ 2 − 1 ) + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ( 1 − χ 2 ) } + ζ 3 { 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − 2 χ 2 ) + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s } + ζ 5 { − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 }
Instead, try …
P t e s t 0 2 P c
=
p 2 ( ρ ρ c ) 2 + p 3 ( ρ ρ c ) 3
⇒ ∂ ∂ ζ [ P t e s t 0 2 P c ]
=
2 p 2 ( ρ ρ c ) ∂ ∂ ζ [ ρ ρ c ] + 3 p 3 ( ρ ρ c ) 2 ∂ ∂ ζ [ ρ ρ c ]
=
( ρ ρ c ) { 2 p 2 + 3 p 3 ( ρ ρ c ) } ∂ ∂ ζ [ ρ ρ c ]
=
( ρ ρ c ) { 2 p 2 + 3 p 3 [ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] } ∂ ∂ ζ [ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
=
( ρ ρ c ) { ( 2 p 2 + 3 p 3 ) − 3 p 3 χ 2 − 3 p 3 ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 } [ − 2 ζ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
=
( ρ ρ c ) ( 1 − e 2 ) − 2 { 6 p 3 χ 2 ζ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 2 ( 2 p 2 + 3 p 3 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ + 6 p 3 ζ 3 }
Compare the term inside the curly braces with the term, from the beginning of this subsection, inside the square brackets, namely,
2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 ζ − 2 A s ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3
=
2 e 4 [ ( 3 − e 2 ) − Υ ] χ 2 ζ − [ 4 e 2 ( 1 − 1 3 Υ ) ] ζ + 4 3 e 4 [ 4 e 2 − 3 ( 1 − e 2 ) + Υ ] ζ 3
=
1 3 e 4 ( 1 − e 2 ) { 6 [ ( 3 − e 2 ) − Υ ] ( 1 − e 2 ) χ 2 ζ − [ 1 2 e 2 ( 1 − 1 3 Υ ) ] ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ + 4 [ ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) + Υ ] ζ 3 } .
Pretty Close!!
Alternatively: according to the third term, we need to set,
6 p 3
=
4 [ ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) + Υ ]
⇒ Υ
=
3 2 p 3 + ( 3 − 4 e 2 )
in which case, the first coefficient must be given by the expression,
[ ( 3 − e 2 ) − Υ ]
=
( 3 − e 2 ) − 3 2 p 3 + ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) ] = [ 3 e 2 − 3 2 p 3 ] .
And, from the second coefficient, we find,
2 ( 2 p 2 + 3 p 3 )
=
[ 1 2 e 2 ( 1 − 1 3 Υ ) ]
⇒ 2 p 2
=
2 e 2 ( 3 − Υ ) − 3 p 3
=
− 3 p 3 + 6 e 2 − 2 e 2 [ 3 2 p 3 + ( 3 − 4 e 2 ) ]
=
− 3 p 3 + 6 e 2 − [ 3 e 2 p 3 + 6 e 2 − 8 e 4 ]
=
8 e 4 − 3 p 3 ( 1 + e 2 ) ;
or,
p 2
=
4 e 4 − ( 1 + e 2 ) [ ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) + Υ ]
=
4 e 4 − ( 1 + e 2 ) ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) − ( 1 + e 2 ) Υ
=
4 e 4 − [ 4 e 2 − 3 + 4 e 4 − 3 e 2 ] − ( 1 + e 2 ) Υ
=
3 − e 2 − ( 1 + e 2 ) Υ
SUMMARY:
P t e s t 0 2 P c
=
p 2 ( ρ ρ c ) 2 + p 3 ( ρ ρ c ) 3 ,
p 2
=
3 − e 2 − ( 1 + e 2 ) Υ = e 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) − e 2 Υ ,
p 3
=
2 3 [ ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) + Υ ] = e 4 ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) + 2 3 e 2 Υ .
Note: according to the first term, we need to set,
p 3
=
[ ( 3 − e 2 ) − Υ ]
⇒ Υ
=
[ ( 3 − e 2 ) − p 3 ] ,
in which case, the third coefficient must be given by the expression,
4 [ ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) + Υ ]
=
4 [ ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) + ( 3 − e 2 ) − p 3 ] = 4 [ 3 e 2 − p 3 ] .
And, from the second coefficient, we find,
2 ( 2 p 2 + 3 p 3 )
=
[ 1 2 e 2 ( 1 − 1 3 Υ ) ]
⇒ 2 p 2
=
2 e 2 ( 3 − Υ ) − 3 p 3
=
2 e 2 [ 3 − [ ( 3 − e 2 ) − p 3 ] ] − 3 p 3
=
2 e 2 [ e 2 + p 3 ] − 3 p 3
=
2 e 4 + ( 2 e 2 − 3 ) p 3 ;
or,
2 p 2
=
2 e 4 + ( 2 e 2 − 3 ) [ ( 3 − e 2 ) − Υ ]
=
2 e 4 + ( 2 e 2 − 3 ) ( 3 − e 2 ) − ( 2 e 2 − 3 ) Υ
=
2 e 4 + ( 6 e 2 − 2 e 4 − 9 + 3 e 2 ) − ( 2 e 2 − 3 ) Υ
=
9 ( e 2 − 1 ) − ( 2 e 2 − 3 ) Υ
Better yet, try …
P t e s t 0 3 P c
=
p 2 ( ρ ρ c ) 2 [ 1 − β ( 1 − ρ ρ c ) ] = p 2 ( ρ ρ c ) 2 [ ( 1 − β ) + β ( ρ ρ c ) ]
⇒ ∂ ∂ ζ [ P t e s t 0 3 P c ]
=
⋯
where, in the case of a spherically symmetric parabolic-density configuration , β = 1 / 2 . Well … this wasn't a bad idea, but as it turns out, this "test03" expression is no different from the "test02" guess. Specifically, the "test03" expression can be rewritten as,
P t e s t 0 3 P c
=
p 2 ( 1 − β ) ( ρ ρ c ) 2 + p 2 β ( ρ ρ c ) 3 ,
which has the same form as the "test02" expression.
Test04
From above, we understand that, analytically,
[ 1 ( π G ρ c 2 a ℓ 2 ) ] ∂ P ∂ ζ
=
[ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] [ 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 ζ − 2 A s ζ + 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ζ 3 ]
=
[ ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) − ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 4 − 2 A s χ 2 ) ] ζ + [ 2 A s s a ℓ 2 − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ( 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 χ 2 − 2 A s ) ] ζ 3 + [ − ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ] ζ 5
=
[ 2 A s ( χ 2 − 1 ) + 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − χ 2 ) χ 2 ] ζ + [ 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − χ 2 ) − 2 A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 χ 2 + 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 A s ] ζ 3 + [ − 2 A s s a ℓ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ] ζ 5 .
Also from above, we have shown that if,
P t e s t 0 2 P c
=
p 2 ( ρ ρ c ) 2 + p 3 ( ρ ρ c ) 3
SUMMARY from test02:
p 2
=
3 − e 2 − ( 1 + e 2 ) Υ = e 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) − e 2 Υ ,
p 3
=
2 3 [ ( 4 e 2 − 3 ) + Υ ] = e 4 ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) + 2 3 e 2 Υ .
⇒ ∂ ∂ ζ [ P t e s t 0 2 P c ]
=
( ρ ρ c ) ( 1 − e 2 ) − 2 { 6 p 3 χ 2 ζ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 2 ( 2 p 2 + 3 p 3 ) ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ + 6 p 3 ζ 3 }
=
( ρ ρ c ) ( 1 − e 2 ) − 2 { 6 [ e 4 ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) + 2 3 e 2 Υ ] χ 2 ζ ( 1 − e 2 ) − 2 [ 2 e 4 ( A ℓ s a ℓ 2 ) + 3 e 4 ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) ] ( 1 − e 2 ) ζ + 6 [ e 4 ( A s s a ℓ 2 ) + 2 3 e 2 Υ ] ζ 3 }
Here (test04), we add a term that is linear in the normalized density, which means,
P t e s t 0 4 P c
=
P t e s t 0 2 P c + p 1 ( ρ ρ c )
⇒ ∂ ∂ ζ [ P t e s t 0 4 P c ]
=
∂ ∂ ζ [ P t e s t 0 2 P c ] + ∂ ∂ ζ [ p 1 ( ρ ρ c ) ] = ∂ ∂ ζ [ P t e s t 0 2 P c ] + p 1 ∂ ∂ ζ [ 1 − χ 2 − ζ 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) − 1 ]
See Also