SSCpt1/Virial/FormFactors/Pt2: Difference between revisions

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Line 54: Line 54:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="center" colspan="3">
   <td align="center" colspan="3">
----
----
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 63: Line 65:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center"><math> \equiv </math>  </td>
   <td align="center"><math> \equiv </math>  </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left"><math>P_\mathrm{norm} R_\mathrm{norm}^3 = \biggl( \frac{K^5}{G^3} \biggr)^{1/2} </math> </td>
<math>P_\mathrm{norm} R_\mathrm{norm}^3 = \biggl( \frac{K^5}{G^3} \biggr)^{1/2} </math>
  </td>
</tr>
</tr>



Revision as of 20:10, 23 June 2024

Structural Form Factors (Pt 2)


Part I:  Synopsis

 


Part II:  n = 5 Polytrope

 


Part III:  n = 1 Polytrope

 

First Detailed Example (n = 5)

Here we complete these integrals to derive detailed expressions for the above subset of structural form factors in the case of spherically symmetric configurations that obey an n=5 polytropic equation of state. The hope is that this will illustrate, in a clear and helpful manner, how the task of calculating form factors is to be carried out, in practice; and, in particular, to provide one nontrivial example for which analytic expressions are derivable. This should simplify the task of debugging numerical algorithms that are designed to calculate structural form factors for more general cases that cannot be derived analytically. The limits of integration will be specified in a general enough fashion that the resulting expressions can be applied, not only to the structures of isolated polytropes, but to pressure-truncated polytropes that are embedded in a hot, tenuous external medium and to the cores of bipolytropes.

Foundation (n = 5)

We use the following normalizations, as drawn from our more general introductory discussion:

Adopted Normalizations (n=5;γ=6/5)

Rnorm

(GK)5/2Mtot2

Pnorm

(K10G9Mtot6)


Enorm

PnormRnorm3=(K5G3)1/2

ρnorm

3Mtot4πRnorm3=34π(KG)15/2Mtot5

cnorm2

Pnormρnorm=4π3(K5G3)1/2Mtot1

Note that the following relations also hold:

Enorm=PnormRnorm3=GMtot2Rnorm=(34π)Mtotcnorm2


As is detailed in our accompanying discussion of bipolytropes — see also our discussion of the properties of isolated polytropes — in terms of the dimensionless Lane-Emden coordinate, ξr/a5, where,

a5=[3K2πG]1/2ρ02/5,

the radial profile of various physical variables is as follows:

r[K1/2/(G1/2ρ02/5)]

=

(32π)1/2ξ,

ρρ0

=

(1+13ξ2)5/2,

PKρ06/5

=

(1+13ξ2)3,

Mr[K3/2/(G3/2ρ01/5)]

=

(23π)1/2[ξ3(1+13ξ2)3/2].

Notice that, in these expressions, the central density, ρ0, has been used instead of Mtot to normalize the relevant physical variables. We can switch from one normalization to the other by realizing that — see, again, our accompanying discussion — in isolated n=5 polytropes, the total mass is given by the expression,

Mtot=[234K3πG3]1/2ρ01/5ρ01/5=[234K3πG3]1/2Mtot1.

Employing this mapping to switch to our "preferred" adopted normalizations, as defined in the above boxed-in table, the four radial profiles become,  

rrRnorm

=

(π234)(32π)1/2ξ=(π2337)1/2ξ,

ρρρnorm

=

(2336π)3/2(1+13ξ2)5/2,

PPPnorm

=

(234π)3(1+13ξ2)3,

MrMtot

=

(π234)1/2(23π)1/2[ξ3(1+13ξ2)3/2]=[ξ23(1+13ξ2)1]3/2.

Mass1 (n = 5)

While we already know the expression for the Mr profile, having copied it from our discussion of detailed force-balanced models of isolated polytropes, let's show how that profile can be derived by integrating over the density profile. After employing the norm-subscripted quantities, as defined above, to normalize the radial coordinate and the mass density in our introductory discussion of the virial theorem, we obtained the following integral defining the,

Normalized Mass:

Mr(r)

=

Mtot0r3(r)2ρdr.

Plugging in the profiles for r and ρ, and recognizing that,

dr=(π2337)1/2dξ,

gives, with the help of Mathematica's Online Integrator,

Mathematica Integral
Mathematica Integral

Mr(ξ)Mtot

=

3(π2337)3/2(2336π)3/20ξξ2(1+13ξ2)5/2dξ

 

=

3(13)3/2[ξ33(1+ξ23)3/2]0ξ

 

=

[ξ23(1+ξ23)1]3/2.

As it should, this expression exactly matches the normalized Mr profile shown above. Notice that if we decide to truncate an n=5 polytrope at some radius, ξ~<ξ1 — as in the discussion that follows — the mass of this truncated configuration will be, simply,

MlimitMtot=Mr(ξ~)Mtot

=

[ξ~23(1+ξ~23)1]3/2.

Mass2 (n = 5)

Alternatively, as has been laid out in our accompanying summary of normalized expressions that are relevant to free-energy calculations,

Mr(x)Mtot

=

(ρcρ¯)eq(MlimitMtot)0x3x2[ρ(x)ρ0]dx,

where, Mlimit is the "total" mass of the polytropic configuration that is truncated at Rlimit; keep in mind that, here,

Mtot=[234K3πG3]1/2ρ01/5,

is the total mass of the isolated n=5 polytrope, that is, a polytrope whose Lane-Emden radius extends all the way to ξ1. In our discussions of truncated polytropes, we often will use ξ~ξ1 to specify the truncated radius in terms of the familiar, dimensionless Lane-Emden radial coordinate, so here we will set,

Rlimit=a5ξ~x=rRlimit=a5ξa5ξ~=ξξ~.

Hence, in terms of the desired integration coordinate, x, the density profile provided above becomes,

ρ(x)ρ0

=

[1+(ξ~23)x2]5/2,

and the integral defining Mr(x) becomes,

Mr(x)Mtot

=

(ρcρ¯)eq(MlimitMtot)0x3x2[1+(ξ~23)x2]5/2dx

 

=

(ρcρ¯)eq(MlimitMtot){x3[1+(ξ~23)x2]3/2}.

In this case, integrating "all the way out to the surface" means setting r=Rlimit and, hence, x=1; by definition, it also means Mr(x)=Mlimit. Therefore we have,

MlimitMtot

=

(ρcρ¯)eq(MlimitMtot)[1+ξ~23]3/2

(ρ¯ρc)eq

=

[1+ξ~23]3/2.

Using this expression for the mean-to-central density ratio along with the expression for the ratio, Mlimit/Mtot, derived in the preceding subsection, we also can state that for truncated n=5 polytropes,

Mr(x)Mtot

=

[1+ξ~23]3/2[ξ~23(1+ξ~23)1]3/2{x3[1+(ξ~23)x2]3/2}

 

=

[ξ~23]3/2{x3[1+(ξ~23)x2]3/2}.

By making the substitution, xξ/ξ~, this expression becomes identical to the Mr/Mtot profile presented just before the "Mass1" subsection, above. In summary, then, we have the following two equally valid expressions for the Mr profile — one expressed as a function of ξ and the other expressed as a function of x:

Mr(ξ)Mtot

=

[ξ23(1+13ξ2)1]3/2;

Mr(x)Mtot

=

[ξ~23]3/2{x3[1+(ξ~23)x2]3/2}.

Mean-to-Central Density (n = 5)

From the above line of reasoning we appreciate that, for any spherically symmetric configuration, the ratio of the configuration's mean density to its central density can be obtained by setting the upper limit of our just-completed "Mass2" integration to x=1. That is to say, quite generally,

MlimitMtot

=

(ρcρ¯)eq(MlimitMtot)013x2[ρ(x)ρ0]dx

(ρ¯ρc)eq

=

013x2[ρ(x)ρ0]dx

But the integral expression on the righthand side of this relation is also the definition of the structural form factor, 𝔣M, given at the top of this page. Hence, we can say, quite generally, that,

𝔣M=ρ¯ρc.

And, given that we have just completed this integral for the case of truncated n=5 polytropic structures, we can state, specifically, that,

𝔣M|n=5=[1+ξ~23]3/2.

Gravitational Potential Energy (n = 5)

As presented at the top of this page, the structural form factor associated with determination of the gravitational potential energy is,

𝔣W

3501{0x[ρ(x)ρ0]x2dx}[ρ(x)ρ0]xdx.

Mathematica Integral
Mathematica Integral

Given that an expression for the normalized density profile,

ρ(x)/ρ0

, has already been determined, above, we can carry out the nested pair of integrals immediately. Indeed, the integral contained inside of the curly braces has already been completed in the "Mass2" subsection, above, in order to determine the radial mass profile. Specifically, we have already determined that,

{0x[ρ(x)ρ0]x2dx}

=

13{0x3x2[1+(ξ~23)x2]5/2dx}

 

=

13{x3[1+(ξ~23)x2]3/2}.

Hence, with the help of Mathematica's Online Integrator, we have,

𝔣W

=

501{x3[1+(ξ~23)x2]3/2}[1+(ξ~23)x2]5/2xdx

 

=

501[1+(ξ~23)x2]4x4dx

 

=

5243(ξ~23)5/2(1+ξ~23)3{(ξ~23)1/2[3(ξ~23)28(ξ~23)3]+3(1+ξ~23)3tan1[(ξ~23)1/2]}.

ASIDE: Now that we have expressions for, both, 𝔣M and 𝔣W, we can determine an analytic expression for the normalized gravitational potential energy for truncated, n=5 polytropes. As is shown in a companion discussion,

WgravEnorm

=

35χ1(MlimitMtot)2𝔣W𝔣M2,

where,

χ

RlimitRnorm=(π2337)1/2ξ~.

In order to simplify typing, we will switch to the variable,

ξ~3ξ~23=2,

in which case a summary of derived expressions, from above, gives,

χ

=

(π2336)1/2;

𝔣M

=

(1+2)3/2;

𝔣W

=

52435(1+2)3{[34823]+3(1+2)3tan1()}

 

=

5245[(48321)(1+2)3+tan1()];

MlimitMtot

=

3(1+2)3/2.

Hence,

(MlimitMtot)2WgravEnorm

=

35(2336π)1/21(1+2)3𝔣W

 

=

(3825π)1/26(1+2)3[(48321)(1+2)3+tan1()]

WgravEnorm

=

(3825π)1/2[(48321)(1+2)3+tan1()].

This exactly matches the normalized gravitational potential energy derived independently in the context of our exploration of (nc,ne)=(5,1) bipolytropes, referred to in that discussion as Wcore*.

Hence, also, as defined in the accompanying introductory discussion, the constant, 𝒜, that appears in our general free-energy equation is (for n=5 polytropic configurations),

𝒜

15[(MlimitMtot)1𝔣M]2𝔣W

 

=

24[(48321)(1+2)3+tan1()].

Thermal Energy (n = 5)

As presented at the top of this page, the structural form factor associated with determination of the configuration's thermal energy is,

𝔣A

013[P(x)P0]x2dx,

Mathematica Integral
Mathematica Integral

Given that an expression for the normalized pressure profile,

P/P0

, has already been provided, above, we can carry out the integral immediately. Specifically, we have,

P(ξ)P0

=

(1+ξ23)3

P(x)P0

=

[1+(ξ~23)x]3.

Hence, with the aid of Mathematica's Online Integrator, the relevant integral gives,

𝔣A

301[1+(ξ~23)x]3x2dx

 

323{(ξ~23)3/2tan1[(ξ~23)1/2]+(ξ~23)1[1+(ξ~23)]12(ξ~23)1[1+(ξ~23)]2}.

ASIDE: Having this expression for 𝔣A allows us to determine an analytic expression for the coefficient, , that appears in our general expression for the free energy, and that can be straightforwardly used to obtain an expression for the thermal energy content of n=5(γ=6/5) polytropic configurations. From our accompanying introductory discussion, we have,

(322π)1/5[(MlimitMtot)1𝔣M]eq6/5𝔣A.

If, as above, we adopt the simplifying variable notation,

ξ~3ξ~23=2,

the various factors in the definition of and Stherm are (see above),

χ

=

(π2336)1/2;

(MlimitMtot)1𝔣M

=

3;

𝔣A

=

323[3tan1()+2(1+2)122(1+2)2].

 

=

3233[tan1()+(21)(1+2)2].

Hence,

=

(36217π)1/53/5[tan1()+(21)(1+2)2];

and (see here and here),

SthermEnorm

=

32(γ1)[𝔖thermEnorm]=32χ3(1γ)=32χ3/5

 

=

32[(π2336)1/2]3/5(36217π)1/53/5[tan1()+(21)(1+2)2]

 

=

[310210(29318π3)(312234π2)]1/10[tan1()+(21)(1+2)2]

 

=

(3827π)1/2[tan1()+(21)(1+2)2].

This exactly matches the normalized thermal energy derived independently in the context of our exploration of (nc,ne)=(5,1) bipolytropes, referred to in that discussion as Score*. Its similarity to the expression for the gravitational potential energy — which is relevant to the virial theorem — is more apparent if it is rewritten in the following form:

SthermEnorm

=

12(3825π)1/2[(41)(1+2)3+tan1()].

Summary (n = 5)

In summary, for n=5 structures we have,

Structural Form Factors (n = 5)

𝔣M

=

(1+2)3/2

𝔣W

=

5245[(48321)(1+2)3+tan1()]

𝔣A

=

3233[tan1()+(21)(1+2)2]

Free-Energy Coefficients (n = 5)

𝒜

=

24[(48321)(1+2)3+tan1()]

=

(36217π)1/53/5[tan1()+(21)(1+2)2]

Normalized Energies (n = 5)

SthermEnorm

=

12(3825π)1/2[(41)(1+2)3+tan1()]

WgravEnorm

=

(3825π)1/2[(48321)(1+2)3+tan1()]

Reality Check (n = 5)

2(SthermEnorm)+WgravEnorm

=

(3825π)1/2{[(41)(1+2)3+tan1()][(48321)(1+2)3+tan1()]}

 

=

(3825π)1/2[833(1+2)3]

 

=

(236π)1/2[(1+2)]3.

For embedded polytropes, this should be compared against the expectation (prediction) provided by Stahler's equilibrium models, as detailed above. Given that, for n=5 polytropes — see the "Mass1" discussion above and our accompanying tabular summary of relevant properties,

MlimitMtot=[2(1+2)1]3/2

  ;        

θ5=(1+2)1/2

        and        

dθ5dξ|ξe=31/2(1+2)3/2,

the expectation is that,

4πPeReq3Enorm

=

[(n+1)34π]1/(n3)[(MlimitMtot)1(θ'n)ξ~](n5)/(n3)(θn)ξ~(n+1)ξ~(n+1)/(n3)

 

=

[233π]1/2(1+2)3(31/2)3

 

=

(236π)1/2[(1+2)]3.

This precisely matches our sum of the thermal and gravitational potential energies, as just determined using our expressions for the structural form factors. This gives us confidence that our form-factor expressions are correct, at least in the case of embedded n=5 polytropic structures.

See Also

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |