SSCpt1/Virial/FormFactors/Pt3

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Structural Form Factors (Pt 3)[edit]


Part I:  Synopsis

 


Part II:  n = 5 Polytrope

 


Part III:  n = 1 Polytrope

 

Second Detailed Example (n = 1)[edit]

Foundation (n = 1)[edit]

We use the following normalizations, as drawn from our more general introductory discussion:

Adopted Normalizations (n=1;γ=2)

Rnorm

(KG)1/2

Pnorm

(G3Mtot2K2)


Enorm

PnormRnorm3=(G3K)1/2Mtot2

ρnorm

3Mtot4πRnorm3=34π(GK)3/2Mtot

cnorm2

Pnormρnorm=4π3(G3K)1/2Mtot

Note that the following relations also hold:

Enorm=PnormRnorm3=GMtot2Rnorm=(34π)Mtotcnorm2


As is detailed in our discussion of the properties of isolated polytropes, in terms of the dimensionless Lane-Emden coordinate, ξr/a1, where,

a1=(K2πG)1/2,

the radial profile of various physical variables is as follows:

r(K/G)1/2

=

(12π)1/2ξ,

ρρ0

=

sinξξ,

PKρ02

=

(sinξξ)2,

Mr(K/G)3/2ρ0

=

(2π)1/2(sinξξcosξ).

Notice that, in these expressions, the central density, ρ0, has been used instead of Mtot to normalize the relevant physical variables. We can switch from one normalization to the other by realizing that — see, again, our accompanying discussion — in isolated n=1 polytropes, the total mass is given by the expression,

Mtot=[2πK3G3]1/2ρ0ρ0=[G32πK3]1/2Mtot.

Employing this mapping to switch to our "preferred" adopted normalizations, as defined in the above boxed-in table, the four radial profiles become,

rrRnorm

=

(12π)1/2ξ,

ρρρnorm

=

(23π32)1/2sinξξ,

PPPnorm

=

12π(sinξξ)2,

MrMtot

=

1π(sinξξcosξ).

Mass1 (n = 1)[edit]

While we already know the expression for the Mr profile, having copied it from our discussion of detailed force-balanced models of isolated polytropes, let's show how that profile can be derived by integrating over the density profile. After employing the norm-subscripted quantities, as defined above, to normalize the radial coordinate and the mass density in our introductory discussion of the virial theorem, we obtained the following integral defining the,

Normalized Mass:

Mr(r)

=

Mtot0r3(r)2ρdr.

Plugging in the profiles for r and ρ gives, with the help of Mathematica's Online Integrator,

Mr(ξ)Mtot

=

30ξξ22π(23π32)1/2sinξξdξ(2π)1/2

 

=

3(2π)3/2(23π32)1/20ξξsinξdξ

 

=

1π(sinξξcosξ).

As it should, this expression exactly matches the normalized Mr profile shown above. Notice that if we decide to truncate an n=1 polytrope at some radius, ξ~<ξ1 — as in the discussion that follows — the mass of this truncated configuration will be, simply,

MlimitMtot=Mr(ξ~)Mtot

=

1π(sinξ~ξ~cosξ~).

Mass2 (n = 1)[edit]

Alternatively, as has been laid out in our accompanying summary of normalized expressions that are relevant to free-energy calculations,

Mr(x)Mtot

=

(ρcρ¯)eq(MlimitMtot)0x3x2[ρ(x)ρ0]dx,

where, Mlimit is the "total" mass of the polytropic configuration that is truncated at Rlimit; keep in mind that, here,

Mtot=[2πK3G3]1/2ρ0,

is the total mass of the isolated n=1 polytrope, that is, a polytrope whose Lane-Emden radius extends all the way to ξ1=π. In our discussions of truncated polytropes, we often will use ξ~ξ1 to specify the truncated radius in terms of the familiar, dimensionless Lane-Emden radial coordinate, so here we will set,

Rlimit=a1ξ~x=rRlimit=a1ξa1ξ~=ξξ~.

Hence, in terms of the desired integration coordinate, x, the density profile provided above becomes,

ρ(x)ρ0

=

sin(ξ~x)ξ~x,

and the integral defining Mr(x) becomes,

Mr(x)Mtot

=

(ρcρ¯)eq(MlimitMtot)3ξ~0xxsin(ξ~x)dx

 

=

(ρcρ¯)eq(MlimitMtot)3ξ~3[sin(ξ~x)(ξ~x)cos(ξ~x)].

In this case, integrating "all the way out to the surface" means setting r=Rlimit and, hence, x=1; by definition, it also means Mr(x)=Mlimit. Therefore we have,

MlimitMtot

=

(ρcρ¯)eq(MlimitMtot)3ξ~3[sinξ~ξ~cosξ~]

(ρ¯ρc)eq

=

3ξ~3[sinξ~ξ~cosξ~].

Using this expression for the mean-to-central density ratio along with the expression for the ratio, Mlimit/Mtot, derived in the preceding subsection, we also can state that for truncated n=1 polytropes,

Mr(x)Mtot

=

1π(sinξ~ξ~cosξ~){[sin(ξ~x)(ξ~x)cos(ξ~x)](sinξ~ξ~cosξ~)}

 

=

1π[sin(ξ~x)(ξ~x)cos(ξ~x)]

By making the substitution, xξ/ξ~, this expression becomes identical to the Mr/Mtot profile presented just before the "Mass1" subsection, above. In summary, then, we have the following two equally valid expressions for the Mr profile — one expressed as a function of ξ and the other expressed as a function of x:

Mr(ξ)Mtot

=

1π(sinξξcosξ);

Mr(x)Mtot

=

1π[sin(ξ~x)(ξ~x)cos(ξ~x)].

Mean-to-Central Density (n = 1)[edit]

Following the line of reasoning provided above, we can use the just-derived central-to-mean density ratio to specify one of the structural form factors. Specifically,

𝔣M|n=1=ρ¯ρc=3ξ~3[sinξ~ξ~cosξ~].

Gravitational Potential Energy (n = 1)[edit]

As presented at the top of this page, the structural form factor associated with determination of the gravitational potential energy is,

𝔣W

3501{0x[ρ(x)ρ0]x2dx}[ρ(x)ρ0]xdx.

From the derivations already presented, above, for n=1 polytropic configurations, we know all of the functions under this integral. We know, for example, that,

{0x[ρ(x)ρ0]x2dx}

=

1ξ~3[sin(ξ~x)(ξ~x)cos(ξ~x)].

Hence, with the help of Mathematica's Online Integrator, we have,

𝔣W

=

35ξ~401{[sin(ξ~x)(ξ~x)cos(ξ~x)]}sin(ξ~x)dx

 

=

35ξ~4{x2sin(2ξ~x)4ξ~ξ~[sin(2ξ~x)2ξ~xcos(2ξ~x)8ξ~2]}01

 

=

3523ξ~6[4ξ~23ξ~sin(2ξ~)+2ξ~2cos(2ξ~)].

ASIDE: Now that we have expressions for, both, 𝔣M and 𝔣W, we can determine an analytic expression for the normalized gravitational potential energy for truncated, n=1 polytropes. As is shown in a companion discussion,

WgravEnorm

=

3𝒜χ1,

where,

𝒜

15[(MlimitMtot)1𝔣M]2𝔣W

χ

RlimitRnorm=(12π)1/2ξ~.

A summary of derived expressions, from above, gives,

𝔣M

=

3ξ~3[sinξ~ξ~cosξ~];

𝔣W

=

3523ξ~6[4ξ~23ξ~sin(2ξ~)+2ξ~2cos(2ξ~)];

MlimitMtot

=

1π(sinξ~ξ~cosξ~).

Hence,

𝒜

=

15[ξ~33π]2𝔣W

 

=

1233π2[4ξ~23ξ~sin(2ξ~)+2ξ~2cos(2ξ~)]

WgravEnorm

=

(125π3)1/2[4ξ~3sin(2ξ~)+2ξ~cos(2ξ~)].

Thermal Energy (n = 1)[edit]

As presented at the top of this page, the structural form factor associated with determination of the configuration's thermal energy is,

𝔣A

013[P(x)P0]x2dx,

Given that an expression for the normalized pressure profile, P/P0, has already been provided, above, we can carry out the integral immediately. Specifically, we have,

P(ξ)P0

=

(sinξξ)2

P(x)P0

=

[sin(ξ~x)(ξ~x)]2.

Hence, with the aid of Mathematica's Online Integrator, the relevant integral gives,

𝔣A

=

3ξ~201sin2(ξ~x)dx

 

=

3ξ~2[x2sin(2ξ~x)4ξ~]01=322ξ~3[2ξ~sin(2ξ~)].


ASIDE: Having this expression for 𝔣A allows us to determine an analytic expression for the coefficient, , that appears in our general expression for the free energy, and that can be straightforwardly used to obtain an expression for the thermal energy content of n=1(γ=2) polytropic configurations. From our accompanying introductory discussion, we have,

=

(322π)[(MlimitMtot)1𝔣M]eq2𝔣A.

The various factors in the definition of and Stherm are (see above),

χ

=

(12π)1/2ξ~;

(MlimitMtot)1𝔣M

=

ξ~33π;

𝔣A

=

322ξ~3[2ξ~sin(2ξ~)].

Hence,

=

(322π)[ξ~33π]2322ξ~3[2ξ~sin(2ξ~)]

 

=

(ξ~324π3)[2ξ~sin(2ξ~)]

and (see here and here),

SthermEnorm

=

32(γ1)[𝔖thermEnorm]=32χ3(1γ)=32χ3

 

=

(3ξ~325π3)[2ξ~sin(2ξ~)][(2π)3/2ξ~3]

 

=

(3227π3)1/2[2ξ~sin(2ξ~)].

Summary (n = 1)[edit]

In summary, for n=1 structures we have,

Structural Form Factors (n = 1)

𝔣M

=

3ξ~3[sinξ~ξ~cosξ~]

𝔣W

=

3523ξ~6[4ξ~23ξ~sin(2ξ~)+2ξ~2cos(2ξ~)]

𝔣A

=

322ξ~3[2ξ~sin(2ξ~)]

Free-Energy Coefficients (n = 1)

𝒜

=

1233π2[4ξ~23ξ~sin(2ξ~)+2ξ~2cos(2ξ~)]

=

(ξ~324π3)[2ξ~sin(2ξ~)]

Normalized Energies (n = 1)

SthermEnorm

=

(3227π3)1/2[2ξ~sin(2ξ~)]

WgravEnorm

=

(125π3)1/2[4ξ~3sin(2ξ~)+2ξ~cos(2ξ~)]

Reality Checks (n = 1)[edit]

Expectation from Stahler's Equilibrium Models[edit]

If we add twice the thermal energy to the gravitational potential energy, we obtain,

2(SthermEnorm)+WgravEnorm

=

(125π3)1/2{[6ξ~3sin(2ξ~)][4ξ~3sin(2ξ~)+2ξ~cos(2ξ~)]}

 

=

(125π3)1/22ξ~{1cos(2ξ~)}=(12π3)1/2ξ~sin2(ξ~).

For embedded polytropes, this should be compared against the expectation (prediction) provided by Stahler's equilibrium models, as detailed above. Given that, for n=1 polytropes — see the "Mass1" discussion above and our accompanying tabular summary of relevant properties,

MlimitMtot=1π(sinξ~ξ~cosξ~)

  ;        

θ1=sinξ~ξ~

        and        

dθ1dξ|ξ~=1ξ~2(sinξ~ξ~cosξ~),

the expectation is that,

4πPeReq3Enorm

=

[(n+1)34π]1/(n3)[(MlimitMtot)1(θ'n)ξ~](n5)/(n3)(θn)ξ~(n+1)ξ~(n+1)/(n3)

 

=

[2π]1/2[1π(sinξ~ξ~cosξ~)ξ~2(sinξ~ξ~cosξ~)1]2(sinξ~ξ~)2ξ~1

 

=

(12π3)1/2ξ~sin2ξ~.

This precisely matches our sum of the thermal and gravitational potential energies, as just determined using our expressions for the structural form factors, giving us additional confidence that our form-factor expressions are correct.

Compare With General Expressions Based on VH74 Work[edit]

Based on the general expressions derived above in the context of VH74, for the specific case of n=1 polytropic configurations, the three structural form factor should be,

𝔣~M

=

(3θ~'ξ~),

𝔣~W

=

354ξ~2[θ~2+3(θ~')2𝔣~Mθ~],

𝔣~A

=

12[3θ~2+3(θ~')2𝔣~Mθ~].

Also, remember that,

θ

=

sinξξ

θ'dθdξ

=

cosξξsinξξ2

(θ')2

=

1ξ4[ξcosξsinξ]2=1ξ4[ξ2cos2ξ2ξsinξcosξ+sin2ξ].

Now, let's look at the structural form factors, one at a time. First, we have,

𝔣M

=

3ξ3[sinξξcosξ]

which matches the expression presented in the summary table, above. Next,

𝔣W

=

354ξ2[sin2ξξ2+3ξ4(ξ2cos2ξ2ξsinξcosξ+sin2ξ)3sinξξ4(sinξξcosξ)]

 

=

354ξ6[ξ2sin2ξ+3(ξ2cos2ξ2ξsinξcosξ+sin2ξ)3sinξ(sinξξcosξ)]

 

=

354ξ6[ξ2+2ξ2cos2ξ3ξsinξcosξ]

 

=

354ξ6{ξ2+ξ2[1+cos(2ξ)]32ξsin(2ξ)}

 

=

358ξ6[4ξ2+2ξ2cos(2ξ)3ξsin(2ξ)],

which also matches the expression presented in the summary table, above. Finally,

𝔣A

=

12[3sin2ξξ2+3ξ4(ξ2cos2ξ2ξsinξcosξ+sin2ξ)3sinξξ4(sinξξcosξ)]

 

=

12ξ4[3ξ2sin2ξ+3(ξ2cos2ξ2ξsinξcosξ+sin2ξ)3sinξ(sinξξcosξ)]

 

=

12ξ4[3ξ2sin2ξ+3(ξ2cos2ξ2ξsinξcosξ)+3ξsinξcosξ]

 

=

32ξ4[ξ2ξsinξcosξ]

 

=

322ξ3[2ξsin(2ξ)],

which also matches the expression presented in the summary table, above. So this adds support to the deduction, above, that VH74 have provided us with the information necessary to develop general expressions for the three structural form factors.

Fiddling Around[edit]

NOTE (from Tohline on 17 March 2015): Chronologically, this "Fiddling Around" subsection was developed before our discovery of the VH74 derivations. It put us on track toward the correct development of general expressions for the structural form factors that are applicable to pressure-truncated polytropic spheres. But this subsection's conclusions are superseded by the VH74 work.

In this subsection, for simplicity, we will omit the "tilde" over the variable ξ. In the case of n=1 structures,

θn+1

=

(sinξξ)2=12ξ2[1cos(2ξ)]=122ξ3[2ξ2ξcos(2ξ)]

𝔣Aθn+1

=

122ξ3[6ξ3sin(2ξ)]122ξ3[2ξ2ξcos(2ξ)]

 

=

122ξ3[4ξ3sin(2ξ)+2ξcos(2ξ)].

But, we also have shown that,

(23ξ535)𝔣W

=

[4ξ3sin(2ξ)+2ξcos(2ξ)].

Hence, we see that,

(2ξ235)𝔣W

=

𝔣Aθn+1.

Similarly, in the case of n=5 structures,

θn+1

=

(1+2)3

(2333)[𝔣Aθn+1]

=

[tan1()+(41)(1+2)3](2333)(1+2)3

 

=

tan1()+(48321)(1+2)3.

But, we also have shown that,

(2455)𝔣W

=

(48321)(1+2)3+tan1().

Hence, we see that,

(2352)𝔣W

=

𝔣Aθn+1

(2ξ25)𝔣W

=

𝔣Aθn+1.

This is pretty amazing! Both examples produce almost exactly the same relationship between the two structural form factors, 𝔣A and 𝔣W. I think that we are well on our way toward nailing down the generic, analytic relationship and, in turn, a generally applicable mass-radius relationship for pressure-truncated polytropic configurations.

Okay … here is the final piece of information. In the case of isolated polytropes, we know that the correct expressions for the structural form factors are as summarized in the following table:

Structural Form Factors for Isolated Polytropes

𝔣~M

=

[3Θ'ξ]ξ~

𝔣~W

=

3255n[Θ'ξ]ξ~2

𝔣~A

=

3(n+1)(5n)[Θ']ξ~2

We notice, from this, that the ratio,

𝔣~A𝔣~W

=

3(n+1)(5n)[Θ']ξ~25n325[ξΘ']ξ~2

 

=

(n+1)ξ~235.

Even in the case of the two pressure-truncated polytropes, analyzed above, this ratio proves to give the correct prefactor on 𝔣W. So we suspect that the universal relationship between the two form factors is,

[(n+1)ξ235]𝔣W

=

𝔣Aθn+1.

See Also[edit]

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |