SSC/BipolytropeGeneralization: Difference between revisions

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 16: Line 16:
</tr>
</tr>
</table>
</table>
On <font color="red">26 August 2014</font>, Tohline finished rewriting the chapter titled "Bipolytrope Generalization" in a very concise manner ([[SSC/BipolytropeGeneralizationVersion2#Bipolytrope_Generalization|go here for this Version2 chapter]]) then set this chapter aside to provide a collection of older attempts at the derivations.  While much of what follows is technically correct, it is overly detailed and cumbersome.  Because it likely also contains some misguided steps, we label it in entirety as Work in Progress.
{{ SGFworkInProgress }}
==Old Stuff==
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathfrak{G}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~W_\mathrm{grav} + \mathfrak{S}_A\biggr|_\mathrm{core} + \mathfrak{S}_A\biggr|_\mathrm{env} </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
~W_\mathrm{grav} + \biggl[ \frac{2}{3(\gamma_c - 1)} \biggr] S_\mathrm{core} + \biggl[ \frac{2}{3(\gamma_e - 1)} \biggr] S_\mathrm{env}  \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
In addition to the gravitational potential energy, which is naturally written as,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~W_\mathrm{grav}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~- \frac{3}{5} \biggl( \frac{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2}{R} \biggr) \cdot \mathfrak{f}_{WM} \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
it seems reasonable to write the separate thermal energy contributions as,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~S_\mathrm{core}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
~\frac{3}{2}\biggl[ M_\mathrm{core} \biggl( \frac{P_{ic}}{\rho_{ic}} \biggr) \biggr] s_\mathrm{core}
= \frac{3}{2} \biggl[ \nu M_\mathrm{tot}  P_{ic} \biggl( \frac{\rho_{ic}}{\bar\rho} \biggr)^{-1} \biggl( \frac{4\pi R^3}{3 M_\mathrm{tot}} \biggr) \biggr] s_\mathrm{core}
= 2\pi R^3 P_{ic} \biggl[ q^3 s_\mathrm{core} \biggr]
\, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~S_\mathrm{env}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
~\frac{3}{2}\biggl[ M_\mathrm{env} \biggl( \frac{P_{ie}}{\rho_{ie}} \biggr) \biggr] s_\mathrm{env}
= \frac{3}{2} \biggl[ (1-\nu) M_\mathrm{tot}  P_{ie} \biggl( \frac{\rho_{ie}}{\bar\rho} \biggr)^{-1} \biggl( \frac{4\pi R^3}{3 M_\mathrm{tot}} \biggr) \biggr] s_\mathrm{env}
= 2\pi R^3 P_{ie} \biggl[ (1-q^3) s_\mathrm{env} \biggr]
\, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
where the subscript "<math>i</math>" means "at the interface," and <math>~\mathfrak{f}_{WM},</math> <math>~s_\mathrm{core},</math> and <math>~s_\mathrm{env}</math> are dimensionless functions of order unity (all three functions to be determined) akin to the [[SSCpt1/Virial#Structural_Form_Factors|structural form factors]] used in our examination of isolated polytropes. 
While exploring how the free-energy function varies across parameter space, we choose to hold <math>~M_\mathrm{tot}</math> and <math>~K_c</math> fixed.  By dimensional analysis, it is therefore reasonable to normalize all energies, length scales, densities and pressures by, respectively,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~E_\mathrm{norm}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\biggl[ \frac{G^{3(\gamma_c-1)} M_\mathrm{tot}^{5\gamma_c-6}}{K_c}  \biggr]^{1/(3\gamma_c -4)} \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~R_\mathrm{norm}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\biggl[ \biggl( \frac{K_c}{G} \biggr) M_\mathrm{tot}^{\gamma_c-2} \biggr]^{1/(3\gamma_c -4)} \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\rho_\mathrm{norm}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{3}{4\pi} \biggl[ \frac{G^3 M_\mathrm{tot}^2}{K_c^3} \biggr]^{1/(3\gamma_c -4)}  \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~P_\mathrm{norm}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\biggl[ \frac{G^{3\gamma_c} M_\mathrm{tot}^{2\gamma_c}}{K_c^4} \biggr]^{1/(3\gamma_c -4)}  \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
As is detailed below &#8212; [[#Detailed_Derivations|first, here]], and via [[#Another_Derivation_of_Free_Energy|an independent derivation, here]] &#8212; quite generally the expression for the normalized free energy is,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathfrak{G}^* \equiv \frac{\mathfrak{G}}{E_\mathrm{norm}}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- \frac{3}{5} \biggl( \frac{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2}{E_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr) \biggl( \frac{1}{R} \biggr) \cdot \mathfrak{f}_{WM}
+ \biggl[ \frac{4\pi q^3 s_\mathrm{core} }{3(\gamma_c - 1)} \biggr] \biggl[ \frac{ R^3 P_{ic} }{E_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr] 
+ \biggl[ \frac{4\pi (1-q^3) s_\mathrm{env} }{3(\gamma_e - 1)} \biggr] \biggl[ \frac{ R^3 P_{ie} }{E_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr] 
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- \frac{3\cdot \mathfrak{f}_{WM}}{5} \chi^{-1}
+ \biggl[ \frac{4\pi q^3 s_\mathrm{core} }{3(\gamma_c - 1)} \biggr] \biggl[ \frac{ R_\mathrm{norm}^4 P_\mathrm{norm} }{E_\mathrm{norm} R_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr] 
\biggl[ \biggl( \frac{P_{ic}}{P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr) \chi^3 \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
+ \biggl[ \frac{4\pi (1-q^3) s_\mathrm{env} }{3(\gamma_e - 1)} \biggr]
\biggl[ \frac{ R_\mathrm{norm}^4 P_\mathrm{norm} }{E_\mathrm{norm} R_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr] 
\biggl[ \biggl( \frac{P_{ie}}{P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr) \chi^3 \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- \frac{3\cdot \mathfrak{f}_{WM}}{5} \chi^{-1}
+ \biggl[ \frac{4\pi q^3 s_\mathrm{core} }{3(\gamma_c - 1)} \biggr] 
\biggl[ \frac{P_{ic} \chi^{3\gamma_c}}{P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq} \chi^{3 -3\gamma_c}
+ \biggl[ \frac{4\pi (1-q^3) s_\mathrm{env} }{3(\gamma_e - 1)} \biggr]
\biggl[ \frac{P_{ie} \chi^{3\gamma_e}}{P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq} \chi^{3 -3\gamma_e}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
where we have introduced the parameter, <math>~\nu \equiv M_\mathrm{core}/M_\mathrm{tot}</math>.  After defining the normalized (and dimensionless) configurarion radius, <math>~\chi \equiv R/R_\mathrm{norm}</math>, we can write the normalized free energy of a bipolytrope in the following compact form:
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathfrak{G}^*</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~ -~ 3\mathcal{A} \chi^{-1} - \frac{\mathcal{B}}{(1-\gamma_c)} ~\chi^{3-3\gamma_c} - \frac{\mathcal{C}}{(1-\gamma_e)} ~\chi^{3-3\gamma_e} \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
where,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathcal{A}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{1}{5} \cdot \mathfrak{f}_{WM} \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathcal{B}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) q^3 s_\mathrm{core} 
\biggl[ \frac{P_{ic} \chi^{3\gamma_c}}{P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq}  \, ,
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathcal{C}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) (1-q^3) s_\mathrm{env}
\biggl[ \frac{P_{ie} \chi^{3\gamma_e}}{P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq} \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
As is [[#pressureMatch|further detailed below]], the second expression for the coefficient, <math>~\mathcal{C}</math>, ensures that the pressure at the "surface" of the core matches the pressure at the "base" of the envelope; but it should only be employed ''after an equilibrium radius'', <math>~\chi_\mathrm{eq}</math>, ''has been identified by locating an extremum in the free energy.''
==Simplest Bipolytrope==
===Familiar Setup===
As has been shown in [[#.280.2C_0.29_Bipolytropes|an accompanying presentation]], for an <math>~(n_c, n_e) = (0, 0)</math> bipolytrope,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathfrak{f}_{WM}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot f \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~s_\mathrm{core}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
1 + \Lambda_\mathrm{eq} \, ,
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~(1-q^3) s_\mathrm{env}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
(1-q^3) + \Lambda\biggl[ \frac{5}{2} \biggl( \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c}\biggr) (-2 + 3q - q^3) +
\frac{3}{2q^2} \biggl( \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c}\biggr)^2 (-1 +5q^2 - 5q^3 + q^5) \biggr]
\, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
and where (see, for example, [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic00#Expression_for_Free_Energy|in the context of its original definition]], or another,  [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic00#LambdaDeff|separate derivation]]),
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\Lambda_\mathrm{eq} 
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{5} \biggl( \frac{\nu}{q} \biggr) \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{q^3} \biggr]^{1-\gamma_c}
\chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_c - 4}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\frac{2}{5(g^2-1)} =
\biggl\{ \frac{5}{2}\biggl(\frac{\rho_e}{\rho_0}\biggr)  \biggl[ 2 \biggl(1 - \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_0} \biggr) \biggl( 1-q \biggr) +
\frac{\rho_e}{\rho_0} \biggl(\frac{1}{q^2} - 1\biggr) \biggr] \biggr\}^{-1} \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
and where (see the [[SSC/VirialStability#Expressions_for_Mass|associated discussion of relevant mass integrals]]),
<div align="center">
<math>
\frac{\rho_c}{\bar\rho} = \frac{\nu}{q^3} \, ; ~~~~~ \frac{\rho_e}{\bar\rho} = \frac{1-\nu}{1-q^3} \, ; ~~~~~
\frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c} = \frac{q^3(1-\nu)}{\nu (1-q^3)} ~~\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{q^3}{\nu} = \biggl( \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c} \biggr) (1-q^3) + q^3 \, .
</math>
</div>
===Cleaner Virial Presentation===
In an effort to show the similarity in structure among the several energy terms, we have also found it useful to write their expressions in the following forms:
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~W_\mathrm{grav}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~- \frac{3}{5} \biggl( \frac{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2}{R} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot f
= - 4\pi P_i R^3 \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\cdot 5\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot \lambda_i f \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~S_\mathrm{core}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~2\pi P_{ic} R^3 \biggl[ q^3 + \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\cdot 5\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot \lambda_{ic} \biggr]  \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~S_\mathrm{env}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~2\pi P_{ie} R^3 \biggl[ (1-q^3) + \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\cdot 5\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot \lambda_{ie} \mathfrak{F} \biggr]  \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
where (see an [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic00#Gravitational_Potential_Energy|associated discussion]] or the [[SSC/VirialStability#Energy_Expressions|original derivation]]),
<div align="center">
<math>
f\biggl(q, \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c}\biggr) = 1 + \frac{5}{2} \biggl( \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c} \biggr) \frac{1}{q^5} \biggl[ (q^3 - q^5 )
+ \biggl( \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c} \biggr) \biggl( \frac{2}{5} - q^3 + \frac{3}{5}q^5 \biggr) \biggr] \, ,
</math>
</div>
and where,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\lambda_i</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2}{R^4 P_i} \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathfrak{F} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{5}{2} \biggl( \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c} \biggr) \frac{1}{q^5} \biggl[  (-2q^2 + 3q^3 - q^5) +
\frac{3}{5} \biggl( \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c}\biggr) (-1 +5q^2 - 5q^3 + q^5) \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\frac{1}{\lambda_{ie}} \biggl( \frac{2^2 \cdot 5\pi}{3} \biggr) \frac{q(1-q^3)}{\nu^2} (s_\mathrm{env} -1)
\, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<div align="center">
<table border="1" cellpadding="10" width="80%">
<tr><td align="left">
This also means that the three key terms used as shorthand notation in the above expressions for the three energy terms have the following definitions:
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathfrak{f}_{WM}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot f \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~s_\mathrm{core}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
1 + \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\cdot 5\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q^4} \cdot \lambda_{ic} \, ,
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~s_\mathrm{env}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
1 + \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\cdot 5\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q(1-q^3)} \cdot \lambda_{ie} \mathfrak{F}
\, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</td></tr>
</table>
</div>
Hence, if all the interface pressures are equal &#8212; that is, if <math>~P_i = P_{ic} = P_{ie}</math> and, hence also, <math>~\lambda_{i} = \lambda_{ic} = \lambda_{ie}</math> &#8212; then the total thermal energy is,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~S_\mathrm{tot} = S_\mathrm{core} + S_\mathrm{env}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
2\pi P_{i} R^3 \biggl[ 1 + \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\cdot 5\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot \lambda_{i} (1+\mathfrak{F}) \biggr] \, ;
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
and the virial is,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~2S_\mathrm{tot} + W_\mathrm{grav}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
4\pi P_{i} R^3 \biggl[ 1 + \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\cdot 5\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot \lambda_{i} (1+\mathfrak{F} - f ) \biggr]
\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
The virial should sum to zero in equilibrium, which means,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{1}{\lambda_i} \biggr|_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\cdot 5\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot (f - 1- \mathfrak{F} )
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~~ \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{2^2\cdot 5\pi}{3} \biggr) \frac{q}{\nu^2} \biggr] \frac{R_\mathrm{eq}^4 P_i}{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
f - 1- \mathfrak{F}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~~ \biggl( \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c} \biggr)^{-1} \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{2^3\pi}{3} \biggr) \frac{q^6}{\nu^2} \biggr] \frac{R_\mathrm{eq}^4 P_i}{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl[ (q^3 - q^5 )+ \biggl( \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c} \biggr) \biggl( \frac{2}{5} - q^3 + \frac{3}{5}q^5 \biggr) \biggr] -
\biggl[  (-2q^2 + 3q^3 - q^5) + \biggl( \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c}\biggr) (-\frac{3}{5}  +3q^2 - 3q^3 + \frac{3}{5} q^5) \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
2q^2(1-q) + \biggl( \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c}\biggr) (1 -3q^2 + 2q^3 ) 
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
q^2 \biggl( \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c} \biggr)^{-1} (g^2-1) 
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow~~~~ \frac{1}{\lambda_i} \biggr|_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{2\pi}{3} \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{q^3} \biggr]^2 q^2 (g^2-1)  \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
===Shift to Central Pressure Normalization===
Let's rework the definition of <math>~\lambda_i</math> in two ways:  (1) Normalize <math>~R_\mathrm{eq}</math> to <math>~R_\mathrm{norm}</math> and normalize the pressure to <math>~P_\mathrm{norm}</math>; (2) shift the referenced pressure from the pressure at the interface <math>~(P_i)</math> to the central pressure <math>~(P_0)</math>, because it is <math>~P_0</math> that is directly related to <math>~K_c</math> and <math>~\rho_c</math>; specifically, <math>P_0 = K_c \rho_c^{\gamma_c}</math>.  Appreciating that, in equilibrium,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~P_i</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~P_0 - q^2 \Pi_\mathrm{eq}
= K_c \rho_c^{\gamma_c} - \frac{3}{2^3 \pi}
\biggl( \frac{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2}{R_\mathrm{eq}^4} \biggr) \biggl( \frac{\nu^2}{q^6} \biggr) q^2 \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
the left-hand-side of the last expression, above, can be rewritten as,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{1}{\lambda_i} \biggr|_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{R_\mathrm{eq}^4 P_i}{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2} </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{R_\mathrm{eq}^4}{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2}
\biggl[ P_0 - \frac{3}{2^3 \pi}
\biggl( \frac{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2}{R_\mathrm{eq}^4} \biggr) \biggl( \frac{\nu^2}{q^6} \biggr) q^2\biggr] </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{R_\mathrm{eq}^4 P_0}{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2} - \frac{2\pi}{3} \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr)
\frac{\nu}{q^3} \biggr]^2 q^2 \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
Hence, the virial equilibrium condition gives,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
\frac{R_\mathrm{eq}^4 P_0}{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2} - \frac{2\pi}{3} \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr)
\frac{\nu}{q^3} \biggr]^2 q^2
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{2\pi}{3} \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{q^3} \biggr]^2 q^2 (g^2-1) 
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
\Rightarrow ~~~~ \frac{R_\mathrm{eq}^4 P_0}{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2} 
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{2\pi}{3} \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{q^3} \biggr]^{2} q^2 g^2  \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
This result precisely matches [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic00#CentralPressure|the result obtained via the detailed force-balanced conditions]] imposed through hydrostatic equilibrium.
Adopting our new variable normalizations and realizing, in particular, that,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~R_\mathrm{norm}^4 P_\mathrm{norm}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~GM_\mathrm{tot}^2 \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
the expression alternatively can be rewritten as,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{1}{\lambda_i} \biggr|_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{R_\mathrm{eq}^4 P_i}{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2}
= \chi_\mathrm{eq}^4 \biggl( \frac{P_i}{P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr) </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\chi_\mathrm{eq}^4 \biggl\{  \frac{K_c \rho_c^{\gamma_c}}{P_\mathrm{norm}} - \frac{2\pi}{3}
\biggl[ \biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{q^3}\biggr]^2 q^2 \biggl( \frac{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2}{R_\mathrm{eq}^4P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr) \biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\chi_\mathrm{eq}^4 \biggl\{  \frac{K_c }{P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggl[ \frac{\rho_c}{\bar\rho} \biggl( \frac{3M_\mathrm{tot}}{4\pi R_\mathrm{norm}^3} \biggr) \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{-3} \biggr]^{\gamma_c}
- \frac{2\pi}{3} \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{q^3}\biggr]^2 q^2 \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{-4} \biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4-3\gamma_c} \biggl[\biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{q^3} \biggr]^{\gamma_c} \frac{K_c }{P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggl( \frac{M_\mathrm{tot}^{\gamma_c}}{R_\mathrm{norm}^{3\gamma_c}} \biggr)
- \frac{2\pi}{3} \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{q^3}\biggr]^2 q^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4-3\gamma_c} \biggl[\biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{q^3} \biggr]^{\gamma_c}
- \frac{2\pi}{3} \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{q^3}\biggr]^2 q^2 \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
Normalized in this manner, the virial equilibrium (as well as the hydrostatic balance) condition gives,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
\chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4-3\gamma_c} \biggl[\biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{q^3} \biggr]^{\gamma_c}
- \frac{2\pi}{3} \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{q^3}\biggr]^2 q^2
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{2\pi}{3} \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{q^3} \biggr]^2 q^2 (g^2-1) 
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
\Rightarrow ~~~~ \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4-3\gamma_c}
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{2\pi}{3} \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{q^3} \biggr]^{2-\gamma_c} q^2 g^2  \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
===Free-Energy Coefficients===
Therefore, for an <math>~(n_c, n_e) = (0, 0)</math> bipolytrope, the coefficients in the normalized free-energy function are,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathcal{A}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
~\frac{\nu^2}{5q} \cdot f
= \frac{1}{5}  \biggl( \frac{\nu}{q^3} \biggr)^2  \biggl[
q^5 + \frac{5}{2} \biggl( \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c} \biggr) q^3 (1 - q^2 )
+ \biggl( \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c} \biggr)^2 \biggl( 1 - \frac{5}{2} q^3 + \frac{3}{2}q^5 \biggr)
\biggr] \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathcal{B}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) q^3 s_\mathrm{core} 
\biggl[ \frac{P_{ic} }{P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_c}
=\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) q^3 s_\mathrm{core} 
\biggl[ \frac{1}{\lambda_{ic}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_c-4}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) q^3 \biggl[ 1 + \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\cdot 5\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q^4} \cdot \lambda_{ic} \biggr]
\biggl[ \frac{1}{\lambda_{ic}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_c-4}
=\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) q^3 \biggl[ \frac{1}{\lambda_{ic}}  + \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\cdot 5\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q^4} \biggr]
\chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_c-4}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) q^3 \biggl\{ \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4-3\gamma_c} \biggl[\biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{q^3} \biggr]^{\gamma_c}
- \frac{2\pi}{3} \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{q^3}\biggr]^2 q^2
+ \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\cdot 5\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q^4} \biggr\}
\chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_c-4}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) q^3 \biggl\{ \biggl[\biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{q^3} \biggr]^{\gamma_c} +
\chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_c-4} \biggl[\frac{3}{2^2\cdot 5\pi} - \frac{3}{2^3\pi}  \biggr]\frac{\nu^2}{q^4} \biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl\{ \nu \biggl[\biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{q^3} \biggr]^{\gamma_c-1} -
\chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_c-4} \biggl( \frac{3^2}{2^3\cdot 5\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q^4} \biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) q^3 \biggr\}
=
\nu \biggl[\biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{q^3} \biggr]^{\gamma_c-1} -
\chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_c-4} \biggl( \frac{3}{10} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathcal{C}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) (1-q^3) s_\mathrm{env}
\biggl[ \frac{P_{ie} \chi^{3\gamma_e}}{P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq} \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
Note that, because <math>~P_{ie} = P_{ic}</math> in equilibrium, the ratio of coefficients,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{\mathcal{C}}{\mathcal{B}}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3(\gamma_e - \gamma_c)}\biggl\{\frac{(1-q^3) s_\mathrm{env}}{q^3 s_\mathrm{core}} \biggr\}</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~~ \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3(\gamma_c - \gamma_e)} \biggl( \frac{\mathcal{C}}{\mathcal{B}} \biggr)</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{  20\pi q(1-q^3) \lambda_i^{-1} + 3\nu^2 \mathfrak{F}  }{ 20\pi q^4 \lambda_i^{-1} + 3\nu^2  }  \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
The equilibrium condition is,
<div align="center">
<math>\frac{\mathcal{A}}{\mathcal{B} + \mathcal{C}^'} = \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4-3\gamma_c} 
\, ,</math>
</div>
where,
<div align="center">
<math>
\mathcal{C}^' \equiv \mathcal{C} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3(\gamma_c-\gamma_e)}  \, .
</math>
</div>
===More General Derivation of Free-Energy Coefficients B and C===
Keep in mind that, generally,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>GM_\mathrm{tot}^2</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~R_\mathrm{norm}^4 P_\mathrm{norm} = E_\mathrm{norm} R_\mathrm{norm}  \, ;</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{1}{\lambda_i}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{R^4 P_i}{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2} = \biggl( \frac{P_i}{P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr) \chi^4
</math>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&hellip; and, note that &hellip; &nbsp;&nbsp;
<math>
\frac{1}{\Lambda} = \biggl( \frac{3\cdot 5}{2^2\pi} \biggr) \frac{1}{\lambda_i} \cdot \frac{1}{q^2 \sigma^2} \, ;
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{\Pi}{P_\mathrm{norm}}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{3}{2^3\pi} \biggl( \frac{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2}{P_\mathrm{norm} R^4} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q^6}
=\biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3} \biggr) \sigma^2 \chi^{-4} \, ;
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{K_c \rho_c^{\gamma_c} }{P_\mathrm{norm}}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{K_c}{P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggl( \frac{\rho_c}{\bar\rho} \biggr)^{\gamma_c} \biggl[ \frac{3M_\mathrm{tot}}{4\pi R^3} \biggr]^{\gamma_c}
= \frac{K_c M_\mathrm{tot}^{\gamma_c} }{R_\mathrm{norm}^{3\gamma_c} P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{q^3} \biggr]^{\gamma_c} \chi^{-3\gamma_c} = \sigma^{\gamma_c} \chi^{-3\gamma_c} \, ,
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
where we have introduced the notation,
<div align="center">
<math>
\sigma \equiv \biggl( \frac{3}{4\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu}{q^3} \, .
</math>
</div>
So, the free-energy coefficient,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathcal{B}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) q^3 s_\mathrm{core} 
\biggl[ \frac{P_{ic} }{P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_c}
=\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) q^3 s_\mathrm{core} 
\biggl[ \frac{1}{\lambda_{ic}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_c-4}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) q^3 \biggl[ 1 + \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\cdot 5\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q^4} \cdot \lambda_{ic} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq}
\biggl[ \frac{1}{\lambda_{ic}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_c-4}
=\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) q^3 \biggl[ \frac{1}{\lambda_{ic}}  + \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\cdot 5\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q^4} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq}
\chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_c-4}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) q^3 \biggl[ \chi_\mathrm{eq}^4 \biggl( \frac{P_{ic}}{P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr)_\mathrm{eq}  +
\biggl( \frac{4\pi}{3\cdot 5} \biggr) q^2 \sigma^2 \biggr] \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_c-4} \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
And the free-energy coefficient,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathcal{C}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) (1-q^3) s_\mathrm{env}
\biggl[ \frac{P_{ie} \chi^{3\gamma_e}}{P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq}
= \biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) (1-q^3) s_\mathrm{env}
\biggl[ \frac{1 }{\lambda_{ie}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_e-4}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) (1-q^3) \biggl\{ \frac{1 }{\lambda_{ie}} + \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\cdot 5\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q(1-q^3)}
\cdot \mathfrak{F}  \biggr\}_\mathrm{eq} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_e-4}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr)
\biggl\{ (1-q^3) \chi_\mathrm{eq}^4 \biggl( \frac{P_{ie}}{P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr)_\mathrm{eq}+ \biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3} \biggr) \sigma^2
\biggl[ \frac{2}{5} q^5 \mathfrak{F} \biggr] \biggr\}_\mathrm{eq} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_e-4} \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<div align="center" id="DerivationTable">
<table border="1" align="center" cellpadding="10">
<tr>
  <td align="center">
OLD DERIVATION
<div align="center">
<math>P_{ic} = K_c \rho_c^{\gamma_c}</math>
</div>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
NEW DERIVATION
<div align="center">
<math>P_{ic} = P_0 - q^2\Pi = K_c \rho_c^{\gamma_c} - q^2\Pi</math>
</div>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center" colspan="2">
&hellip; therefore &hellip;
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="left">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathcal{B}_\mathrm{OLD}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) q^3 \biggl[ \sigma^{\gamma_c} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4 - 3\gamma_c} +
\biggl( \frac{4\pi}{3\cdot 5} \biggr) q^2 \sigma^2 \biggr] \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_c-4}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) q^3 \biggl[ \sigma^{\gamma_c}  +
\biggl( \frac{4\pi}{3\cdot 5} \biggr) q^2 \sigma^2 \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_c-4} \biggr] 
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathcal{B}_\mathrm{NEW}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) q^3 \biggl[ \sigma^{\gamma_c} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4 - 3\gamma_c}
-  \biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3} \biggr) q^2 \sigma^2
+ \biggl( \frac{4\pi}{3\cdot 5} \biggr) q^2 \sigma^2 \biggr] \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_c-4}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) q^3 \biggl[ \sigma^{\gamma_c} 
-  \biggl( \frac{2\pi}{5} \biggr) q^2 \sigma^2 \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_c-4} \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center" colspan="2">
&hellip; and, enforcing in equilibrium <math>~P_{ie} = P_{ic}</math> &hellip;
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="left">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathcal{C}_\mathrm{OLD}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr)
\biggl\{ (1-q^3) \biggl[ \sigma^{\gamma_c} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4-3\gamma_c} \biggr] + \biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3} \biggr) \sigma^2
\biggl[ \frac{2}{5} q^5 \mathfrak{F} \biggr] \biggr\}_\mathrm{eq} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_e-4}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr)
\biggl[ (1-q^3) \sigma^{\gamma_c}  + \biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3} \biggr) \sigma^2
\biggl( \frac{2}{5} q^5 \mathfrak{F} \biggr) \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_e-4}\biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathcal{C}_\mathrm{NEW}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr)
\biggl\{ (1-q^3) \biggl[ \sigma^{\gamma_c} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4-3\gamma_c} - \biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3} \biggr) q^2  \sigma^2 \biggr] + \biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3} \biggr) \sigma^2
\biggl[ \frac{2}{5} q^5 \mathfrak{F} \biggr] \biggr\}_\mathrm{eq} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_e-4}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr)
\biggl\{ (1-q^3) \sigma^{\gamma_c} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_e - 3\gamma_c}
+ \biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3} \biggr) \sigma^2 \biggl[  \biggl( \frac{2}{5} q^5 \mathfrak{F} \biggr)
- q^2 (1-q^3)  \biggr] \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3\gamma_e-4} \biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center" colspan="2">
&hellip; and, also &hellip;
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="left">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{1}{\lambda_i} \biggr|_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\sigma^{\gamma_c} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4 - 3\gamma_c}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~~ \frac{1}{\Lambda_\mathrm{eq}} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{q^2 } \biggl( \frac{3\cdot 5}{2^2\pi} \biggr) \sigma^{\gamma_c - 2} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4 - 3\gamma_c} 
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{5q}{\nu} \biggr) \sigma^{\gamma_c - 1} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4 - 3\gamma_c} 
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{1}{\lambda_i} \biggr|_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\sigma^{\gamma_c} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4 - 3\gamma_c} -  \biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3} \biggr) q^2 \sigma^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~~ \frac{1}{\Lambda_\mathrm{eq}} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{q^2 \sigma^2} \biggl( \frac{3\cdot 5}{2^2\pi} \biggr) \biggl[
\sigma^{\gamma_c} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4 - 3\gamma_c} -  \biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3} \biggr) q^2 \sigma^2 \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{5q}{\nu} \biggr) \sigma^{\gamma_c - 1} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4 - 3\gamma_c}  - \frac{5}{2}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
===Extrema===
Extrema in the free energy occur when,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathcal{A}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\mathcal{B} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4-3\gamma_c} + \mathcal{C} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4-3\gamma_e} \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
Also, as stated above, because <math>~P_{ie} = P_{ic}</math> in equilibrium, the ratio of coefficients,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{\mathcal{C}}{\mathcal{B}}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\chi_\mathrm{eq}^{3(\gamma_e - \gamma_c)}\biggl[ \frac{(1-q^3) s_\mathrm{env}}{q^3 s_\mathrm{core}} \biggr] \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
When put together, these two relations imply,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathcal{A}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\mathcal{B} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4-3\gamma_c} + \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4-3\gamma_c} \mathcal{B}
\biggl[ \frac{(1-q^3) s_\mathrm{env}}{q^3 s_\mathrm{core}} \biggr] </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\mathcal{B} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4-3\gamma_c} \biggl[ 1+ \frac{(1-q^3) s_\mathrm{env}}{q^3 s_\mathrm{core}} \biggr] \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
But the definition of <math>~\mathcal{B}</math> gives,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathcal{B} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4-3\gamma_c}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) q^3 s_\mathrm{core} 
\biggl[ \frac{1}{\lambda_{ic}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq} \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
Hence, extrema occur when,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathcal{A}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3} \biggr) q^3 s_\mathrm{core} 
\biggl[ \frac{1}{\lambda_{ic}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq}  \biggl[ 1+ \frac{(1-q^3) s_\mathrm{env}}{q^3 s_\mathrm{core}} \biggr] </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~~ \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2 \cdot 5\pi } \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot f</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math> 
\biggl[ \frac{1}{\lambda_{ic}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq}  \biggl[ q^3 s_\mathrm{core}  +  (1-q^3) s_\mathrm{env} \biggr] </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math> 
\frac{q^3}{[\lambda_i]_\mathrm{eq}} + \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\cdot 5\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q}
+ \frac{(1-q^3)}{[\lambda_i]_\mathrm{eq}} + \biggl( \frac{3}{2^2\cdot 5\pi} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot \mathfrak{F}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~~\biggl[ \frac{1}{\lambda_{ic}} \biggr]_\mathrm{eq}  </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math> 
\biggl( \frac{3}{2^2 \cdot 5\pi } \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q} \cdot (f - 1 - \mathfrak{F})
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math> 
\biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3 } \biggr) \sigma^{2} q^2 (g^2 - 1 ) \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
In what follows, keep in mind that,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4-3\gamma_c}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{R_\mathrm{eq}}{R_\mathrm{norm}} \biggr)^{4-3\gamma_c}
= R_\mathrm{eq}^{4-3\gamma_c} \biggl( \frac{K_c}{G} \biggr) M_\mathrm{tot}^{\gamma_c-2} \, ;
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~K_c \rho_c^{\gamma_c}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
K_c \biggl( \frac{\rho_c}{\bar\rho} \biggr)^{\gamma_c} \biggl[ \frac{3M_\mathrm{tot}}{4\pi R^3} \biggr]^{\gamma_c}
= K_c \sigma^{\gamma_c} M_\mathrm{tot}^{\gamma_c} R^{-3\gamma_c} \, ;
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\Pi</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{3}{2^3 \pi} \biggl(  \frac{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2}{R^4} \biggr) \frac{\nu^2}{q^6}
= \frac{2\pi}{3} \biggl(  \frac{GM_\mathrm{tot}^2}{R^4} \biggr) \sigma^2 \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<div align="center">
<table border="1" align="center" cellpadding="10">
<tr>
  <td align="center">
OLD DERIVATION
<div align="center">
<math>P_{i} = K_c \rho_c^{\gamma_c}</math>
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~~ K_c  = P_{i} \sigma^{-\gamma_c} M_\mathrm{tot}^{-\gamma_c} R^{+3\gamma_c}  </math></div>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
NEW DERIVATION
<div align="center">
<math>P_0 = K_c \rho_c^{\gamma_c} </math>
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~~ K_c = P_0 \sigma^{-\gamma_c} M_\mathrm{tot}^{-\gamma_c} R^{+3\gamma_c}  </math>
</div>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center" colspan="2">
&hellip; hence, as derived in the above table &hellip;
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="left">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{1}{\lambda_i} \biggr|_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\sigma^{\gamma_c} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4 - 3\gamma_c}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{1}{\lambda_i} \biggr|_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\sigma^{\gamma_c} \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4 - 3\gamma_c} -  \biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3} \biggr) q^2 \sigma^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center" colspan="2">
&hellip; which, when combined with the condition that identifies extrema, gives &hellip;
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="left">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4 - 3\gamma_c}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3 } \biggr) \sigma^{2-\gamma_c} q^2 (g^2 - 1 )
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\Rightarrow ~~~~ R_\mathrm{eq}^{4-3\gamma_c} \biggl( \frac{K_c}{G} \biggr) M_\mathrm{tot}^{\gamma_c-2} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3 } \biggr) \sigma^{2-\gamma_c} q^2 (g^2 - 1 )
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~~ \frac{ R_\mathrm{eq}^{4}  P_i }{GM_\mathrm{tot}^{2} } </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3 } \biggr) \sigma^{2} q^2 (g^2-1)
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\sigma^{\gamma_c}\chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4 - 3\gamma_c} -  \biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3} \biggr) q^2 \sigma^2</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3 } \biggr) \sigma^2 q^2 (g^2 - 1 )
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~~ \chi_\mathrm{eq}^{4 - 3\gamma_c} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3 } \biggr) \sigma^{2-\gamma_c} q^2 g^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~~ R_\mathrm{eq}^{4-3\gamma_c} \biggl( \frac{K_c}{G} \biggr) M_\mathrm{tot}^{\gamma_c-2} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3 } \biggr) \sigma^{2-\gamma_c} q^2 g^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~~ \frac{ R_\mathrm{eq}^{4}  P_0 }{GM_\mathrm{tot}^{2} } </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl( \frac{2\pi}{3 } \biggr) \sigma^{2} q^2 g^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center" colspan="2">
These are consistent results because they result in the detailed force-balance relation, <math>P_0 - P_i = q^2 \Pi_\mathrm{eq} \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
==Examples==
<table border="1" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <th align="center" colspan="11">
<font size="+1">Identification of Local ''Extrema'' in Free Energy</font>
  </th>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\nu</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~q</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~ \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~f\biggl(q, \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c} \biggr)</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~g^2\biggl(q, \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c} \biggr)</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\Lambda_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\chi_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\mathcal{A}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\mathcal{B}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\mathcal{C}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
MIN/MAX
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.2</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~9^{-1/3} = 0.48075</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.5</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~12.5644</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~2.091312</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.366531</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.037453</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.2090801</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.2308269</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~2.06252 \times 10^{-4}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
MIN
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.4</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~4^{-1/3} = 0.62996</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.5</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~4.21974</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~1.56498</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.707989</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.0220475</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.2143496</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.5635746</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~4.4626 \times 10^{-5}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
MIN
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.473473</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.681838</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.516107</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.462927</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.08255</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
"
  </td>
  <td align="center">
"
  </td>
  <td align="center">
"
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<font color="red">MAX</font>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.5</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~3^{-1/3} = 0.693361</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.5</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~2.985115</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~1.42334</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.9448663</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.0152116</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.2152641</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.791882</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~1.5464 \times 10^{-5}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
MIN
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.559839</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.729581</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.499188</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.75089</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.032196</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
"
  </td>
  <td align="center">
"
  </td>
  <td align="center">
"
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<font color="red">MAX</font>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
<table border="1" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <th align="center" colspan="13">
<font size="+1">Free Energy Extrema when: &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  </font><math>~~~~~\frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c} = \frac{1}{2} ~~~~\Rightarrow~~~~ q^3 = \frac{\nu}{2-\nu}</math>
  </th>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\nu</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~q</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~ \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~f\biggl(q, \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c} \biggr)</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~g^2\biggl(q, \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c} \biggr)</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\frac{1}{\lambda_{i}}\biggr|_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\chi_\mathrm{eq}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\mathcal{A}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\mathcal{B}_\mathrm{NEW}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\mathcal{C}_\mathrm{NEW}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~G^*</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<font color="red">Stability</font>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
MIN/MAX
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.5</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\biggl( \frac{1}{3} \biggr)^{1/3}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.5</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~2.985115</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~1.423340</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.05466039</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.3152983</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.21526406</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.23552725</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~6.643899 \times 10^{-3}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~+ 0.5176146</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~+0.429245</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
MIN
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center">
&hellip;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&hellip;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&hellip;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.6674</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
"
  </td>
  <td align="center">
"
  </td>
  <td align="center">
"
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~+0.55572115</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<font color="red">MAX</font>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.6</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\biggl( \frac{3}{7} \biggr)^{1/3}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.5</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~2.2507129</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~1.31282895</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.04160318</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.3411545</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.21493717</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.26165939</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~5.208750 \times 10^{-3}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~+ 0.73532249</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~+0.0935217</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
MIN
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center">
&hellip;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&hellip;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&hellip;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.431745</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
"
  </td>
  <td align="center">
"
  </td>
  <td align="center">
"
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~+0.7367797</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<font color="red">MAX</font>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.7</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\biggl( \frac{7}{13} \biggr)^{1/3}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.5</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~1.7707809</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~1.2209446</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.029500</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.3589388</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.21330744</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.28172532</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~3.389793 \times 10^{-3}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~+ 0.8953395</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~- 0.0767108</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<font color="red">MAX</font>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center">
&hellip;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&hellip;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&hellip;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~0.270615</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
"
  </td>
  <td align="center">
"
  </td>
  <td align="center">
"
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~+0.89227216</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
MIN
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <th align="center" colspan="13">
System should be <font color="red">''stable''</font> (with free energy ''minimum'') if: &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <math>~~~~~\frac{( \gamma_e - \frac{4}{3})}{(\gamma_e - \gamma_c)}  f - \biggl[1 + \frac{5}{2} (g^2-1) \biggr] ~>~ 0</math>
  </th>
</tr>
</table>
==Solution Strategy==
For a given set of free-energy coefficients, <math>~\mathcal{A}, \mathcal{B},</math> and <math>~\mathcal{C}</math>, along with a choice of the two adiabatic exponents <math>~(\gamma_c, \gamma_e)</math>, here's how to determine all of the physical parameters that are detailed in the above example table.
* '''<font color="darkgreen">Step 1:</font>'''  Guess a value of <math>~0 < q < 1</math>.
* '''<font color="darkgreen">Step 2:</font>'''  Given the pair of parameter values, <math>~(\mathcal{A}, q)</math>, determine the interface-density ratio, <math>~\rho_e/\rho_c</math>, by finding the appropriate root of the expression that defines the function, <math>~\mathcal{A}(q, \rho_e/\rho_c)</math>.  This can be straightforwardly accomplished because, [[#Explain_Logic|as demonstrated below]], the relevant expression can be written as a quadratic function of <math>~(\rho_e/\rho_c)</math>.
* '''<font color="darkgreen">Step 3:</font>'''  Given the pair of parameter values, <math>~(q, \rho_e/\rho_c)</math>, determine the value of the core-to-total mass ratio, <math>~\nu</math>, from the expression that was obtained from an integration over the mass, namely,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{1}{\nu}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~1 + \biggl( \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_c} \biggr) \biggl( \frac{1}{q^3} - 1 \biggr) \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
* '''<font color="darkgreen">Step 4:</font>'''  Given the value of <math>~\mathcal{B}</math> along with the pair of parameter values, <math>~(q, \nu)</math>, the above expression that defines <math>~\mathcal{B}</math> can be solved to give the relevant value of the dimensionless parameter, <math>~\Lambda_\mathrm{eq}.</math>
* '''<font color="darkgreen">Step 5:</font>'''  The value of <math>~\mathcal{C}^'</math> &#8212; the coefficient that appears on the right-hand-side of the above expression that defines <math>~\mathcal{C}</math> &#8212; can be determined, given the values of parameter triplet, <math>~(q, \nu, \Lambda_\mathrm{eq})</math>.
* '''<font color="darkgreen">Step 6:</font>'''  Given the value of <math>~\mathcal{C}</math> and the just-determined value of the coefficient <math>~\mathcal{C}^'</math>, the normalized equilibrium radius, <math>~\chi_\mathrm{eq},</math> that corresponds to the value of <math>~q</math> that was ''guessed'' in Step #1 can be determined from the above definition of <math>~\mathcal{C}</math>, specifically,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\chi_\mathrm{eq}\biggr|_\mathrm{guess} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\biggl( \frac{\mathcal{C}}{\mathcal{C}^'} \biggr)^{1/(3\gamma_e - 3\gamma_c)} \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
* '''<font color="darkgreen">Step 7:</font>'''  But, independent of this ''guessed'' value of <math>~\chi_\mathrm{eq},</math> the condition for virial equilibrium &#8212; which identifies extrema in the free-energy function &#8212; gives the following expression for the normalized equilibrium radius:
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\chi_\mathrm{eq}\biggr|_\mathrm{virial} </math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~\biggl[ \frac{\mathcal{A}}{\mathcal{B} + \mathcal{C}^'}  \biggr]^{1/(4 - 3\gamma_c)} \, .</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
* '''<font color="darkgreen">Step 8:</font>'''  If <math>~\chi_\mathrm{eq}|_\mathrm{guess} \ne \chi_\mathrm{eq}|_\mathrm{virial}</math>, return to Step #1 and guess a different value of <math>~q</math>.  Repeat Steps #1 through #7 until the two independently derived values of the normalized radius match, to a desired level of precision.
* '''<font color="darkgreen">Keep in mind:</font>'''  (A) A graphical representation of the free-energy function, <math>~\mathfrak{G}(\chi)</math>, can also be used to identify the "correct" value of <math>~\chi_\mathrm{eq}</math> and, ultimately, the above-described iteration loop should converge on this value.  (B) The free-energy function may exhibit more than one (or, actually, no) extrema, in which case more than one (or no) value of <math>~q</math> should lead to convergence of the above-described iteration loop.


=Related Discussions=
=Related Discussions=

Latest revision as of 00:45, 16 January 2024

Bipolytrope Generalization (Pt 1)[edit]


Part I:  Bipolytrope Generalization

 


Part II:  Derivations

 


Part III:  Examples

 


Part IV:  Best of the Best

 


On 26 August 2014, Tohline finished rewriting the chapter titled "Bipolytrope Generalization" in a very concise manner (go here for this Version2 chapter) then set this chapter aside to provide a collection of older attempts at the derivations. While much of what follows is technically correct, it is overly detailed and cumbersome. Because it likely also contains some misguided steps, we label it in entirety as Work in Progress.


Material that appears after this point in our presentation is under development and therefore
may contain incorrect mathematical equations and/or physical misinterpretations.
|   Go Home   |


Old Stuff[edit]

𝔊

=

Wgrav+𝔖A|core+𝔖A|env

 

=

Wgrav+[23(γc1)]Score+[23(γe1)]Senv.

In addition to the gravitational potential energy, which is naturally written as,

Wgrav

=

35(GMtot2R)𝔣WM,

it seems reasonable to write the separate thermal energy contributions as,

Score

=

32[Mcore(Picρic)]score=32[νMtotPic(ρicρ¯)1(4πR33Mtot)]score=2πR3Pic[q3score],

Senv

=

32[Menv(Pieρie)]senv=32[(1ν)MtotPie(ρieρ¯)1(4πR33Mtot)]senv=2πR3Pie[(1q3)senv],

where the subscript "i" means "at the interface," and 𝔣WM, score, and senv are dimensionless functions of order unity (all three functions to be determined) akin to the structural form factors used in our examination of isolated polytropes.

While exploring how the free-energy function varies across parameter space, we choose to hold Mtot and Kc fixed. By dimensional analysis, it is therefore reasonable to normalize all energies, length scales, densities and pressures by, respectively,

Enorm

[G3(γc1)Mtot5γc6Kc]1/(3γc4),

Rnorm

[(KcG)Mtotγc2]1/(3γc4),

ρnorm

34π[G3Mtot2Kc3]1/(3γc4),

Pnorm

[G3γcMtot2γcKc4]1/(3γc4).

As is detailed below — first, here, and via an independent derivation, here — quite generally the expression for the normalized free energy is,

𝔊*𝔊Enorm

=

35(GMtot2Enorm)(1R)𝔣WM+[4πq3score3(γc1)][R3PicEnorm]+[4π(1q3)senv3(γe1)][R3PieEnorm]

 

=

3𝔣WM5χ1+[4πq3score3(γc1)][Rnorm4PnormEnormRnorm][(PicPnorm)χ3]

 

 

+[4π(1q3)senv3(γe1)][Rnorm4PnormEnormRnorm][(PiePnorm)χ3]

 

=

3𝔣WM5χ1+[4πq3score3(γc1)][Picχ3γcPnorm]eqχ33γc+[4π(1q3)senv3(γe1)][Pieχ3γePnorm]eqχ33γe

where we have introduced the parameter, νMcore/Mtot. After defining the normalized (and dimensionless) configurarion radius, χR/Rnorm, we can write the normalized free energy of a bipolytrope in the following compact form:

𝔊*

=

3𝒜χ1(1γc)χ33γc𝒞(1γe)χ33γe,

where,

𝒜

15𝔣WM,

(4π3)q3score[Picχ3γcPnorm]eq,

𝒞

(4π3)(1q3)senv[Pieχ3γePnorm]eq.

As is further detailed below, the second expression for the coefficient, 𝒞, ensures that the pressure at the "surface" of the core matches the pressure at the "base" of the envelope; but it should only be employed after an equilibrium radius, χeq, has been identified by locating an extremum in the free energy.

Simplest Bipolytrope[edit]

Familiar Setup[edit]

As has been shown in an accompanying presentation, for an (nc,ne)=(0,0) bipolytrope,

𝔣WM

ν2qf,

score

1+Λeq,

(1q3)senv

(1q3)+Λ[52(ρeρc)(2+3qq3)+32q2(ρeρc)2(1+5q25q3+q5)],

and where (see, for example, in the context of its original definition, or another, separate derivation),

Λeq

=

15(νq)[(34π)νq3]1γcχeq3γc4

 

=

25(g21)={52(ρeρ0)[2(1ρeρ0)(1q)+ρeρ0(1q21)]}1,

and where (see the associated discussion of relevant mass integrals),

ρcρ¯=νq3;ρeρ¯=1ν1q3;ρeρc=q3(1ν)ν(1q3)q3ν=(ρeρc)(1q3)+q3.

Cleaner Virial Presentation[edit]

In an effort to show the similarity in structure among the several energy terms, we have also found it useful to write their expressions in the following forms:

Wgrav

=

35(GMtot2R)ν2qf=4πPiR3(3225π)ν2qλif,

Score

=

2πPicR3[q3+(3225π)ν2qλic],

Senv

=

2πPieR3[(1q3)+(3225π)ν2qλie𝔉],

where (see an associated discussion or the original derivation),

f(q,ρeρc)=1+52(ρeρc)1q5[(q3q5)+(ρeρc)(25q3+35q5)],

and where,

λi

GMtot2R4Pi,

𝔉

52(ρeρc)1q5[(2q2+3q3q5)+35(ρeρc)(1+5q25q3+q5)]

 

=

1λie(225π3)q(1q3)ν2(senv1).

This also means that the three key terms used as shorthand notation in the above expressions for the three energy terms have the following definitions:

𝔣WM

ν2qf,

score

1+(3225π)ν2q4λic,

senv

1+(3225π)ν2q(1q3)λie𝔉,

Hence, if all the interface pressures are equal — that is, if Pi=Pic=Pie and, hence also, λi=λic=λie — then the total thermal energy is,

Stot=Score+Senv

=

2πPiR3[1+(3225π)ν2qλi(1+𝔉)];

and the virial is,

2Stot+Wgrav

=

4πPiR3[1+(3225π)ν2qλi(1+𝔉f)].

The virial should sum to zero in equilibrium, which means,

1λi|eq

=

(3225π)ν2q(f1𝔉)

[(225π3)qν2]Req4PiGMtot2

=

f1𝔉

(ρeρc)1[(23π3)q6ν2]Req4PiGMtot2

=

[(q3q5)+(ρeρc)(25q3+35q5)][(2q2+3q3q5)+(ρeρc)(35+3q23q3+35q5)]

 

=

2q2(1q)+(ρeρc)(13q2+2q3)

 

=

q2(ρeρc)1(g21)

1λi|eq

=

2π3[(34π)νq3]2q2(g21).

Shift to Central Pressure Normalization[edit]

Let's rework the definition of λi in two ways: (1) Normalize Req to Rnorm and normalize the pressure to Pnorm; (2) shift the referenced pressure from the pressure at the interface (Pi) to the central pressure (P0), because it is P0 that is directly related to Kc and ρc; specifically, P0=Kcρcγc. Appreciating that, in equilibrium,

Pi

=

P0q2Πeq=Kcρcγc323π(GMtot2Req4)(ν2q6)q2,

the left-hand-side of the last expression, above, can be rewritten as,

1λi|eq

Req4PiGMtot2

 

=

Req4GMtot2[P0323π(GMtot2Req4)(ν2q6)q2]

 

=

Req4P0GMtot22π3[(34π)νq3]2q2.

Hence, the virial equilibrium condition gives,

Req4P0GMtot22π3[(34π)νq3]2q2

=

2π3[(34π)νq3]2q2(g21)

Req4P0GMtot2

=

2π3[(34π)νq3]2q2g2.

This result precisely matches the result obtained via the detailed force-balanced conditions imposed through hydrostatic equilibrium.

Adopting our new variable normalizations and realizing, in particular, that,

Rnorm4Pnorm

=

GMtot2,

the expression alternatively can be rewritten as,

1λi|eq

Req4PiGMtot2=χeq4(PiPnorm)

 

=

χeq4{KcρcγcPnorm2π3[(34π)νq3]2q2(GMtot2Req4Pnorm)}

 

=

χeq4{KcPnorm[ρcρ¯(3Mtot4πRnorm3)χeq3]γc2π3[(34π)νq3]2q2χeq4}

 

=

χeq43γc[(34π)νq3]γcKcPnorm(MtotγcRnorm3γc)2π3[(34π)νq3]2q2

 

=

χeq43γc[(34π)νq3]γc2π3[(34π)νq3]2q2.

Normalized in this manner, the virial equilibrium (as well as the hydrostatic balance) condition gives,

χeq43γc[(34π)νq3]γc2π3[(34π)νq3]2q2

=

2π3[(34π)νq3]2q2(g21)

χeq43γc

=

2π3[(34π)νq3]2γcq2g2.

Free-Energy Coefficients[edit]

Therefore, for an (nc,ne)=(0,0) bipolytrope, the coefficients in the normalized free-energy function are,

𝒜

=

ν25qf=15(νq3)2[q5+52(ρeρc)q3(1q2)+(ρeρc)2(152q3+32q5)],

(4π3)q3score[PicPnorm]eqχeq3γc=(4π3)q3score[1λic]eqχeq3γc4

 

=

(4π3)q3[1+(3225π)ν2q4λic][1λic]eqχeq3γc4=(4π3)q3[1λic+(3225π)ν2q4]χeq3γc4

 

=

(4π3)q3{χeq43γc[(34π)νq3]γc2π3[(34π)νq3]2q2+(3225π)ν2q4}χeq3γc4

 

=

(4π3)q3{[(34π)νq3]γc+χeq3γc4[3225π323π]ν2q4}

 

=

{ν[(34π)νq3]γc1χeq3γc4(32235π)ν2q4(4π3)q3}=ν[(34π)νq3]γc1χeq3γc4(310)ν2q

𝒞

(4π3)(1q3)senv[Pieχ3γePnorm]eq.

Note that, because Pie=Pic in equilibrium, the ratio of coefficients,

𝒞

=

χeq3(γeγc){(1q3)senvq3score}

χeq3(γcγe)(𝒞)

=

20πq(1q3)λi1+3ν2𝔉20πq4λi1+3ν2.


The equilibrium condition is,

𝒜+𝒞'=χeq43γc,

where,

𝒞'𝒞χeq3(γcγe).

More General Derivation of Free-Energy Coefficients B and C[edit]

Keep in mind that, generally,

GMtot2

=

Rnorm4Pnorm=EnormRnorm;

1λi

R4PiGMtot2=(PiPnorm)χ4   … and, note that …    1Λ=(3522π)1λi1q2σ2;

ΠPnorm

=

323π(GMtot2PnormR4)ν2q6=(2π3)σ2χ4;

KcρcγcPnorm

=

KcPnorm(ρcρ¯)γc[3Mtot4πR3]γc=KcMtotγcRnorm3γcPnorm[(34π)νq3]γcχ3γc=σγcχ3γc,

where we have introduced the notation,

σ(34π)νq3.

So, the free-energy coefficient,

=

(4π3)q3score[PicPnorm]eqχeq3γc=(4π3)q3score[1λic]eqχeq3γc4

 

=

(4π3)q3[1+(3225π)ν2q4λic]eq[1λic]eqχeq3γc4=(4π3)q3[1λic+(3225π)ν2q4]eqχeq3γc4

 

=

(4π3)q3[χeq4(PicPnorm)eq+(4π35)q2σ2]χeq3γc4.


And the free-energy coefficient,

𝒞

(4π3)(1q3)senv[Pieχ3γePnorm]eq=(4π3)(1q3)senv[1λie]eqχeq3γe4

 

=

(4π3)(1q3){1λie+(3225π)ν2q(1q3)𝔉}eqχeq3γe4

 

=

(4π3){(1q3)χeq4(PiePnorm)eq+(2π3)σ2[25q5𝔉]}eqχeq3γe4.

OLD DERIVATION

Pic=Kcρcγc

NEW DERIVATION

Pic=P0q2Π=Kcρcγcq2Π

… therefore …

OLD

=

(4π3)q3[σγcχeq43γc+(4π35)q2σ2]χeq3γc4

 

=

(4π3)q3[σγc+(4π35)q2σ2χeq3γc4]

NEW

=

(4π3)q3[σγcχeq43γc(2π3)q2σ2+(4π35)q2σ2]χeq3γc4

 

=

(4π3)q3[σγc(2π5)q2σ2χeq3γc4]

… and, enforcing in equilibrium Pie=Pic

𝒞OLD

=

(4π3){(1q3)[σγcχeq43γc]+(2π3)σ2[25q5𝔉]}eqχeq3γe4

 

=

(4π3)[(1q3)σγc+(2π3)σ2(25q5𝔉)χeq3γe4]

𝒞NEW

=

(4π3){(1q3)[σγcχeq43γc(2π3)q2σ2]+(2π3)σ2[25q5𝔉]}eqχeq3γe4

 

=

(4π3){(1q3)σγcχeq3γe3γc+(2π3)σ2[(25q5𝔉)q2(1q3)]χeq3γe4}

… and, also …

1λi|eq

=

σγcχeq43γc

1Λeq

=

1q2(3522π)σγc2χeq43γc

 

=

(5qν)σγc1χeq43γc

1λi|eq

=

σγcχeq43γc(2π3)q2σ2

1Λeq

=

1q2σ2(3522π)[σγcχeq43γc(2π3)q2σ2]

 

=

(5qν)σγc1χeq43γc52

Extrema[edit]

Extrema in the free energy occur when,

𝒜

=

χeq43γc+𝒞χeq43γe.

Also, as stated above, because Pie=Pic in equilibrium, the ratio of coefficients,

𝒞

=

χeq3(γeγc)[(1q3)senvq3score].

When put together, these two relations imply,

𝒜

=

χeq43γc+χeq43γc[(1q3)senvq3score]

 

=

χeq43γc[1+(1q3)senvq3score].

But the definition of gives,

χeq43γc

=

(4π3)q3score[1λic]eq.

Hence, extrema occur when,

𝒜

=

(4π3)q3score[1λic]eq[1+(1q3)senvq3score]

(3225π)ν2qf

=

[1λic]eq[q3score+(1q3)senv]

 

=

q3[λi]eq+(3225π)ν2q+(1q3)[λi]eq+(3225π)ν2q𝔉

[1λic]eq

=

(3225π)ν2q(f1𝔉)

 

=

(2π3)σ2q2(g21).

In what follows, keep in mind that,

χeq43γc

=

(ReqRnorm)43γc=Req43γc(KcG)Mtotγc2;

Kcρcγc

=

Kc(ρcρ¯)γc[3Mtot4πR3]γc=KcσγcMtotγcR3γc;

Π

=

323π(GMtot2R4)ν2q6=2π3(GMtot2R4)σ2.


OLD DERIVATION

Pi=Kcρcγc

Kc=PiσγcMtotγcR+3γc

NEW DERIVATION

P0=Kcρcγc

Kc=P0σγcMtotγcR+3γc

… hence, as derived in the above table …

1λi|eq

=

σγcχeq43γc

1λi|eq

=

σγcχeq43γc(2π3)q2σ2

… which, when combined with the condition that identifies extrema, gives …

χeq43γc

=

(2π3)σ2γcq2(g21)

Req43γc(KcG)Mtotγc2

=

(2π3)σ2γcq2(g21)

Req4PiGMtot2

=

(2π3)σ2q2(g21)

σγcχeq43γc(2π3)q2σ2

=

(2π3)σ2q2(g21)

χeq43γc

=

(2π3)σ2γcq2g2

Req43γc(KcG)Mtotγc2

=

(2π3)σ2γcq2g2

Req4P0GMtot2

=

(2π3)σ2q2g2

These are consistent results because they result in the detailed force-balance relation, P0Pi=q2Πeq.

Examples[edit]

Identification of Local Extrema in Free Energy

ν

q

ρeρc

f(q,ρeρc)

g2(q,ρeρc)

Λeq

χeq

𝒜

𝒞

MIN/MAX

0.2

91/3=0.48075

0.5

12.5644

2.091312

0.366531

0.037453

0.2090801

0.2308269

2.06252×104

MIN

0.4

41/3=0.62996

0.5

4.21974

1.56498

0.707989

0.0220475

0.2143496

0.5635746

4.4626×105

MIN

0.473473

0.681838

0.516107

 

 

0.462927

0.08255

"

"

"

MAX

0.5

31/3=0.693361

0.5

2.985115

1.42334

0.9448663

0.0152116

0.2152641

0.791882

1.5464×105

MIN

0.559839

0.729581

0.499188

 

 

0.75089

0.032196

"

"

"

MAX



Free Energy Extrema when:     ρeρc=12q3=ν2ν

ν

q

ρeρc

f(q,ρeρc)

g2(q,ρeρc)

1λi|eq

χeq

𝒜

NEW

𝒞NEW

G*

Stability

MIN/MAX

0.5

(13)1/3

0.5

2.985115

1.423340

0.05466039

0.3152983

0.21526406

0.23552725

6.643899×103

+0.5176146

+0.429245

MIN

 

 

 

0.6674

"

"

"

+0.55572115

 

MAX

0.6

(37)1/3

0.5

2.2507129

1.31282895

0.04160318

0.3411545

0.21493717

0.26165939

5.208750×103

+0.73532249

+0.0935217

MIN

 

 

 

0.431745

"

"

"

+0.7367797

 

MAX

0.7

(713)1/3

0.5

1.7707809

1.2209446

0.029500

0.3589388

0.21330744

0.28172532

3.389793×103

+0.8953395

0.0767108

MAX

 

 

 

0.270615

"

"

"

+0.89227216

 

MIN

System should be stable (with free energy minimum) if:     (γe43)(γeγc)f[1+52(g21)]>0

Solution Strategy[edit]

For a given set of free-energy coefficients, 𝒜,, and 𝒞, along with a choice of the two adiabatic exponents (γc,γe), here's how to determine all of the physical parameters that are detailed in the above example table.

  • Step 1: Guess a value of 0<q<1.
  • Step 2: Given the pair of parameter values, (𝒜,q), determine the interface-density ratio, ρe/ρc, by finding the appropriate root of the expression that defines the function, 𝒜(q,ρe/ρc). This can be straightforwardly accomplished because, as demonstrated below, the relevant expression can be written as a quadratic function of (ρe/ρc).
  • Step 3: Given the pair of parameter values, (q,ρe/ρc), determine the value of the core-to-total mass ratio, ν, from the expression that was obtained from an integration over the mass, namely,

1ν

=

1+(ρeρc)(1q31).

  • Step 4: Given the value of along with the pair of parameter values, (q,ν), the above expression that defines can be solved to give the relevant value of the dimensionless parameter, Λeq.
  • Step 5: The value of 𝒞' — the coefficient that appears on the right-hand-side of the above expression that defines 𝒞 — can be determined, given the values of parameter triplet, (q,ν,Λeq).
  • Step 6: Given the value of 𝒞 and the just-determined value of the coefficient 𝒞', the normalized equilibrium radius, χeq, that corresponds to the value of q that was guessed in Step #1 can be determined from the above definition of 𝒞, specifically,

χeq|guess

=

(𝒞𝒞')1/(3γe3γc).

  • Step 7: But, independent of this guessed value of χeq, the condition for virial equilibrium — which identifies extrema in the free-energy function — gives the following expression for the normalized equilibrium radius:

χeq|virial

=

[𝒜+𝒞']1/(43γc).

  • Step 8: If χeq|guessχeq|virial, return to Step #1 and guess a different value of q. Repeat Steps #1 through #7 until the two independently derived values of the normalized radius match, to a desired level of precision.
  • Keep in mind: (A) A graphical representation of the free-energy function, 𝔊(χ), can also be used to identify the "correct" value of χeq and, ultimately, the above-described iteration loop should converge on this value. (B) The free-energy function may exhibit more than one (or, actually, no) extrema, in which case more than one (or no) value of q should lead to convergence of the above-described iteration loop.

Related Discussions[edit]

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |