SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/RedGiantToPN: Difference between revisions

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Line 1: Line 1:
__FORCETOC__
__FORCETOC__
=Main Sequence to Red Giant to Planetary Nebula=
=Main Sequence to Red Giant to Planetary Nebula=
<table border="1" align="center" width="100%" colspan="8">
<tr>
  <td align="center" bgcolor="lightblue" width="25%"><br />[[SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/RedGiantToPN|Part I:&nbsp; Background &amp; Objective]]
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center" bgcolor="lightblue" width="25%"><br />[[SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/RedGiantToPN/Pt2|Part II:&nbsp; ]]
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center" bgcolor="lightblue" width="25%"><br />[[SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/RedGiantToPN/Pt3|Part III:&nbsp; ]]
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center" bgcolor="lightblue"><br />[[SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/RedGiantToPN/Pt4|Part IV:&nbsp;]]
&nbsp;
  </td>
</tr>
</table>


==Preface==
==Preface==

Revision as of 17:15, 22 November 2025

Main Sequence to Red Giant to Planetary Nebula


Part I:  Background & Objective

 


Part II: 

 


Part III: 

 


Part IV: 

 

Preface

In terms of mass (m), length (ℓ), and time (t), the units of various physical constants and variables are:

Mass-density

∼

mℓ−3

Pressure (energy-density)

∼

mℓ−1t−2

Newtonian gravitational constant, G

∼

m−1ℓ3t−2

The core's polytropic constant, Kc

∼

[m−1ℓ13t−10]1/5

The envelope's polytropic constant, Ke

∼

m−1ℓ5t−2


As a result, for example (see details below), if we hold the central-density (ρ0) — as well as G and Kc — constant along an equilibrium sequence, mass will scale as …

Mass

∼

[Kc3/2G−3/2ρ0−1/5]

 

∼

{[m−1ℓ13t−10]1/5}3/2[m−1ℓ3t−2]−3/2[mℓ−3]−1/5

 

∼

[m−3/10+3/2−1/5][ℓ39/10−9/2+3/5][t−3+3]

 

∼

[m+1][ℓ0][t0].

If instead (see details below) we hold Ke — as well as G and Kc — constant along an equilibrium sequence, mass will scale as …

Mass

∼

[Kc5KeG−6]1/4

 

∼

{[m−1ℓ13t−10][m−1ℓ5t−2][m−1ℓ3t−2]−6}1/4

 

∼

{[m−1−1+6][ℓ13+5−18][t−10−2+12]}1/4

 

∼

[m+1][ℓ0][t0].

Original Model Construction

Fixed Central Density

From Examples, we find,

Mcore=Mcore*[Kc3/2G−3/2ρ0−1/5]

=

[Kc3/2G−3/2ρ0−1/5](6π)1/2(ξiθi)3;

Mtot=Mtot*[Kc3/2G−3/2ρ0−1/5]

=

[Kc3/2G−3/2ρ0−1/5](μeμc)−2(2π)1/2Aηsθi;

rcore=rcore*[Kc1/2G−1/2ρ0−2/5]

=

[Kc1/2G−1/2ρ0−2/5](32π)1/2ξi;

R=rs*[Kc1/2G−1/2ρ0−2/5]

=

[Kc1/2G−1/2ρ0−2/5](μeμc)−1ηs2πθi2;

where, rewriting the relevant expressions in terms of the parameters,

ℓi≡ξi3;       and       m3≡3(μeμc),

we find,

θi

=

(1+ℓi2)−1/2

ηi

=

(μeμc)3θi2ξi=m3(ℓi1+ℓi2)

Λi

=

1ηi−ξi3=[1+ℓi2m3ℓi]−ℓi=1m3ℓi[1+(1−m3)ℓi2]

A2

=

ηi2(1+Λi2)

 

=

m32(ℓi1+ℓi2)2⋅(1+ℓi2)m32ℓi2[1+(1−m3)2ℓi2]

 

=

[1+(1−m3)2ℓi21+ℓi2]

ηs

=

π2+ηi+tan−1(Λi)

Fixed Interface Pressure

Equilibrium Sequence Expressions

From the relevant interface conditions, we find,

(KeKc)

=

ρ0−4/5(μeμc)−2θi−4.

Inverting this last expression gives,

ρ04/5

=

(μeμc)−2θi−4(KeKc)−1

⇒ρ01/5

=

[(μeμc)−1/2θi−1(KeKc)−1/4].

Hence, keeping Kc and Ke constant, we have,

Mcore

=

[Kc3/2G−3/2(KeKc)1/4][(μeμc)1/2θi](6π)1/2(ξiθi)3

 

=

[Kc5KeG−6]1/4(μeμc)1/2(6π)1/2ξi3θi4;

Mtot

=

[Kc3/2G−3/2(KeKc)1/4][(μeμc)1/2θi](μeμc)−2(2π)1/2Aηsθi

 

=

[Kc5KeG−6]1/4(μeμc)−3/2(2π)1/2Aηs;

rcore

=

[KeG−1]1/2(μeμc)(32π)1/2ξiθi2;

R

=

[KeG−1]1/2ηs2π;

ρ0

=

[KeKc]−5/4(μeμc)−5/2θi−5;

Pi

=

[Kc][(μeμc)−3θi−6(KeKc)−3/2]θi6

 

=

[Kc5Ke−3]1/2(μeμc)−3.

This last expression shows that if Kc and Ke are both held fixed, then the interface pressure, Pi, will be constant along the sequence of equilibrium models.

Note also:

ν≡McoreMtot

=

{[Kc5KeG−6]1/4(μeμc)1/2(6π)1/2ξi3θi4}{[Kc5KeG−6]1/4(μeμc)−3/2(2π)1/2Aηs}−1

 

=

(μeμc)23ξi3θi4Aηs;

q≡rcoreR

=

{[KeG−1]1/2(μeμc)(32π)1/2ξiθi2}{[KeG−1]1/2ηs2π}−1

 

=

(μeμc)3ξiθi2ηs.

Sequence Plots

A plot of Mtot[Kc5KeG−6]−1/4 versus R[KeG−1]−1/2 at fixed interface pressure will be generated via the relations,

Ordinate: Mtot   Abscissa: R

(μeμc)−3/2(2π)1/2Aηs

vs

ηs2π.

Alternatively, a plot of Mtot[Kc5KeG−6]−1/4 versus log10(ρ0)[KeKc]5/4 at fixed interface pressure will be generated via the relations,

Ordinate: Mtot   Abscissa: log10(ρ0)

(μeμc)−3/2(2π)1/2Aηs

vs

log10[(μeμc)−5/2θi−5]


file = Dropbox/WorkFolder/Wiki edits/BiPolytrope/TwoFirstOrderODEs/Bipolytrope51New.xlsx --- worksheet = SequenceMuRatio100
file = Dropbox/WorkFolder/Wiki edits/BiPolytrope/TwoFirstOrderODEs/Bipolytrope51New.xlsx --- worksheet = SequenceMuRatio100
Example data values drawn from worksheet "SequenceMuRatio100" …

Δξ=(9.01499598−0.05)/99=0.0905551

ngrid ξi=0.05+(ngrid−1)⋅Δξ θi A ηs Mtot log⁡10ρ0 R
1 0.05 0.9995836 1.00124818 3.141592582 2.510 0.0009044 1.253
2 0.140555 0.9967235 1.0097655 3.141580334 2.531 0.0071264 1.253
18 1.5894375 0.7367887 1.539943947 2.821678456 3.467 0.663285301 1.126
19 1.6799927 0.7178117 1.566601145 2.775921455 3.470 0.719947375 1.107
20 1.7705478 0.6992927 1.591530391 2.728957898 3.465 0.7767049 1.089
100 9.0149598 0.1886798 1.973119305 0.841461698 1.325 3.62137 0.336

Equilibrium Sequences of (nc,ne)=(5,1) BiPolytropes Having μe/μc=1.0

Mass vs. Radius
(Fixed Interface Pressure)
Mass vs. Central Density
(Fixed Interface Pressure)

Total Mass vs Radius

Total Mass vs Central Density

file = Dropbox/WorkFolder/Wiki edits/BiPolytrope/TwoFirstOrderODEs/Bipolytrope51New.xlsx --- worksheet = MuRatio100Fund
file = Dropbox/WorkFolder/Wiki edits/BiPolytrope/TwoFirstOrderODEs/Bipolytrope51New.xlsx --- worksheet = MuRatio100Fund
Data values drawn from worksheet "MuRatio100Fund" …

Properties of the Marginally Unstable Model

ξi θi A ηs Mtot log⁡10ρ0 R
1.6639103 0.7211498 1.561995126 2.784147185 3.4698598 0.709872477 1.1107140

Fixed Total Mass

Equilibrium Sequence Expressions

Again, drawing from previous Examples in which ρ0 — as well as Kc and G — is held fixed, equilibrium models obey the relations,

Mtot

=

Mtot*[Kc3/2G−3/2ρ0−1/5]=[Kc3/2G−3/2ρ0−1/5](μeμc)−2(2π)1/2Aηsθi;

R

=

R*[Kc1/2G−1/2ρ0−2/5]=[Kc1/2G−1/2ρ0−2/5](μeμc)−1ηs2πθi2;

Pi

=

Pi*[Kcρ06/5]=[Kcρ06/5]θi6.

Let's invert the first expression in order to construct equilibrium sequences in which the total mass — rather than ρ0 — is held fixed. We find that,

ρ01/5

=

[Kc3/2G−3/2Mtot−1](μeμc)−2(2π)1/2Aηsθi

⇒R

=

[Kc1/2G−1/2](μeμc)−1ηs2πθi2{[Kc3/2G−3/2Mtot−1](μeμc)−2(2π)1/2Aηsθi}−2

 

=

[Kc1/2G−1/2](μeμc)−1ηs2πθi2[Kc3/2G−3/2Mtot−1]−2(μeμc)4(π2)θi2A2ηs2

 

=

[Kc−5/2G5/2Mtot2](μeμc)3(π23)1/21A2ηs.

And,

Pi

=

Kcθi6{[Kc3/2G−3/2Mtot−1](μeμc)−2(2π)1/2Aηsθi}6

 

=

Kc{[Kc3/2G−3/2Mtot−1]6(μeμc)−12(2π)3A6ηs6}

 

=

[Kc10G−9Mtot−6](μeμc)−12(2π)3A6ηs6.

Note as well that,

Pi(4π3R3)

=

4π3[Kc10G−9Mtot−6](μeμc)−12(2π)3A6ηs6{[Kc−5/2G5/2Mtot2](μeμc)3(π23)1/21A2ηs}3

 

=

4π3(2π)3(π23)3/2[Kc10G−9Mtot−6](μeμc)−12ηs3{[Kc−15/2G15/2Mtot6](μeμc)9}

 

=

4π3(2π)3(π23)3/2[Kc5/2G−3/2](μeμc)−3ηs3

Sequence Plots

A plot of Pi[Kc−10G9Mtot6] versus R3[Kc5/2G−5/2Mtot−2]3 at fixed interface pressure will be generated via the relations,

Ordinate   Abscissa

(μeμc)−12(2π)3A6ηs6

vs

{(μeμc)3(π23)1/21A2ηs}3

Pressure vs Volume
Pressure vs Volume
nu vs q
nu vs q

Hidden Text

Following the Lead of Yabushita75

Here in the context of (nc,ne)=(5,1) bipolytropes, we want to construct an interface-pressure versus volume plot; and mass-versus-central density plots like the ones displayed for truncated isothermal spheres in Figure 1 of an accompanying discussion, and as displayed for a (nc,ne)=(∞,3/2) bipolytrope in Figure 1 (p. 445) of 📚 S. Yabushita (1975, MNRAS, Vol. 172, pp. 441 - 453).

In our accompanying chapter that presents example models of (nc,ne)=(5,1) bipolytropes, we have adopted the following normalizations:

ρ*

≡

ρρ0

;    

r*

≡

r[Kc1/2/(G1/2ρ02/5)]

P*

≡

PKcρ06/5

;    

Mr*

≡

Mr[Kc3/2/(G3/2ρ01/5)]

Also, from the relevant interface conditions, we find,

(KeKc)

=

ρ0−4/5(μeμc)−2θi−4.

Inverting this last expression gives,

ρ04/5

=

(μeμc)−2θi−4(KeKc)−1

⇒ρ01/5

=

(μeμc)−1/2θi−1(KeKc)−1/4.

Hence, we can rewrite the "normalized" expressions as follows:

r

=

r*[Kc1/2G−1/2ρ0−2/5]

 

=

r*{Kc1/2G−1/2[(μeμc)−1/2θi−1(KeKc)−1/4]−2}

 

=

r*{Kc1/2G−1/2[(μeμc)θi2(KeKc)1/2]}

 

=

r*[Ke1/2G−1/2](μeμc)θi2.


Fixed Interface Pressure

Start with the model relation,

Pi

=

[Kcρ06/5]Pi*

 

=

[Kcρ06/5](1+13ξi2)−3

Now, given that,

ρ01/5

=

(μeμc)−1/2θi−1(KeKc)−1/4.

⇒ρ06/5

=

(μeμc)−3θi−6(KeKc)−3/2.

Fixed Total Mass

Also, from the relevant interface conditions, we find,

(KeKc)

=

ρ0−4/5(μeμc)−2θi−4.

Inverting this last expression gives,

ρ04/5

=

(μeμc)−2θi−4(KeKc)−1

⇒ρ01/5

=

(μeμc)−1/2θi−1(KeKc)−1/4.

Hence, for a given specification of the interface location, ξi — test values shown (in parentheses) assuming μe/μc=1.0 and ξi=0.5 — the desired expression for the central density is,

ρ0

=

[Ke−5Kc5]1/4(μeμc)−5/2θi−5;

and, drawing the expression for the normalized total mass from our accompanying table of parameter values, namely,

Mtot*

=

(μeμc)−2(2π)1/2Aηsθi

we find,

Mr

=

Mr*[Kc3/2G−3/2ρ0−1/5]

 

=

Mr*[Kc3/2G−3/2]{(μeμc)−1/2θi−1(KeKc)−1/4}−1

 

=

Mr*[Kc3/2G−3/2(KeKc)1/4](μeμc)1/2θi

⇒Mtot

=

[Kc3/2G−3/2(KeKc)1/4](μeμc)1/2θi(μeμc)−2(2π)1/2Aηsθi

 

=

[KeKc−5G−6]1/4(μeμc)−3/2(2π)1/2Aηs,

where — again, from our accompanying table of parameter values —

θi

=

(1+13ξi2)−1/2;

      (0.96077)

ηi

=

(μeμc)3θi2ξi;

      (0.79941)

Λi

=

1ηi−ξi3;

      (0.96225)

A

=

ηi(1+Λi2)1/2;

      (1.10940)

ηs

=

ηi+π2+tan−1(Λi);

      (3.13637)

Mtot[KeKc−5G−6]1/4

=

(μeμc)−3/2(2π)1/2Aηs;

      (2.77623)

ρ0[Ke−5Kc5]1/4

=

(μeμc)−5/2θi−5.

      (1.22153)

Building on Earlier Eigenfunction Details

In the heading of Figure 6 from our accompanying presentation of the properties of marginally unstable oscillation modes in (nc,ne)=(5,1) bipolytropes, we point to the (Excel spreadsheet) "Data File" that contains most of the relevant model details. See specifically,

file = Dropbox/WorkFolder/Wiki edits/BiPolytrope/LinearPerturbation/FaulknerBipolytrope1.xlsx --- worksheet = Mode0Ensemble
file = Dropbox/WorkFolder/Wiki edits/BiPolytrope/LinearPerturbation/FaulknerBipolytrope1.xlsx --- worksheet = Mode0Ensemble
Figure 6: Eigenfunctions Associated with the Fundamental-Mode of Radial Oscillation

in Marginally Unstable Models having Various μe/μc

Related Discussions

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |