ParabolicDensity/Axisymmetric/Structure: Difference between revisions
| Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\frac{1}{4e^4}\biggl\{- (3 + 2e^2) (1-e^2)+3 (1 - e^2)^{1 / 2} \biggl[\frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e}\biggr] \biggr\} | \frac{1}{4e^4}\biggl\{- (3 + 2e^2) (1-e^2)+3 (1 - e^2)^{1 / 2} \biggl[\frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e}\biggr] \biggr\} | ||
= | |||
\biggl[\frac{1}{2}-\frac{(A_s - A_\ell)}{4e^2}\biggr] | |||
\, ; | \, ; | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="right">[0.3726937]</td> | <td align="right">[0.3726937]</td> | ||
| Line 174: | Line 176: | ||
\frac{( 4e^2 - 3 )}{e^4(1-e^2)} | \frac{( 4e^2 - 3 )}{e^4(1-e^2)} | ||
+ | + | ||
\frac{3 (1-e^2)^{1 / 2}}{e^4} \biggl[\frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e}\biggr] \biggr\} | \frac{3 (1-e^2)^{1 / 2}}{e^4} \biggl[\frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e}\biggr] \biggr\} | ||
= | |||
\frac{2}{3}\biggl[ (1-e^2)^{-1} - \frac{(A_s-A_\ell)}{e^2} \biggr] | |||
\, ; | \, ; | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="right">[0.7021833]</td> | <td align="right">[0.7021833]</td> | ||
| Line 198: | Line 202: | ||
- | - | ||
3 (1-e^2)^{1 / 2} \biggl[\frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e}\biggr] | 3 (1-e^2)^{1 / 2} \biggl[\frac{\sin^{-1}e}{e}\biggr] | ||
\biggr\} \, , | \biggr\} | ||
= | |||
\frac{(A_s - A_\ell)}{e^2} | |||
\, , | |||
</math> | </math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Revision as of 23:00, 12 November 2024
Parabolic Density Distribution
Part I: Gravitational Potential
|
Part II: Spherical Structures
|
Part III: Axisymmetric Equilibrium Structures |
Part IV: Triaxial Equilibrium Structures (Exploration)
|
Axisymmetric (Oblate) Equilibrium Structures
Tentative Summary
Known Relations
| Density: |
|
|
|
| Gravitational Potential: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and, |
|
|
where, and , and the relevant index symbol expressions are:
|
|
[1.7160030] | ||
|
|
|
|
[0.6055597] |
|
|
[0.7888807] | ||
|
|
|
|
[0.3726937] |
|
|
|
|
[0.7021833] |
|
|
|
|
[0.5092250] |
where the eccentricity,
NOTE: The posted numerical evaluations (inside square brackets) assume that the configuration's eccentricity is .
Drawing from our separate "6th Try" discussion — and as has been highlighted here for example — for the axisymmetric configurations under consideration, the and components of the Euler equation become, respectively,
|
Multiplying the component through by length and dividing through by the square of the velocity , we have,
|
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
Multiplying the component through by length and dividing through by the square of the velocity , we have,
| : |
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
Play With Vertical Pressure Gradient
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Integrate over gives …
|
|
||
|
|
If I am interpreting this correctly, should tell how the normalized pressure varies with , for a fixed choice of . Again, for a fixed choice of , we want to specify the value of the "const." — hereafter, — such that at the surface of the configuration; but at the surface, it must also be true that,
| at the surface … |
|
Hence (numerical evaluations assume χ = 0.6),
|
|
|
Central Pressure
At the center of the configuration — where — we see that,
Hence, the central pressure is,
|

Note for later use that,
|
… |
Now Play With Radial Pressure Gradient
After multiplying through by , the last term on the RHS of the component is given by the expression,
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
If we replace the normalized pressure by , the first term on the RHS of the component becomes,
|
|
||
|
|
Hence,
|
|
= |
|
10th Try
Repeating Key Relations
| Density: |
|
|
|
| Gravitational Potential: |
|
|
|
| Vertical Pressure Gradient: |
|
From the above (9th Try) examination of the vertical pressure gradient, we determined that a reasonably good approximation for the normalized pressure throughout the configuration is given by the expression,
|
|
If we set — that is, if we look along the vertical axis — this approximation should be particularly good, resulting in the expression,
|
|
|
Note that in the limit that — that is, at the pole along the vertical (symmetry) axis where the should drop to zero — we should set . This allows us to determine the central pressure.
|
This means that, along the vertical axis, the pressure gradient is,
|
|
|
|
This should match the more general "vertical pressure gradient" expression when we set, , that is,
|
|
||
|
|
Yes! The expressions match!
See Also
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |