ParabolicDensity/Axisymmetric/Structure: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 258: | Line 258: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
</td></tr></table> | </td></tr></table> | ||
Multiplying through by length <math>(a_\ell)</math> and dividing through by the square of the velocity <math>(\pi G \rho_c a_\ell^2)</math>, we have, | |||
Multiplying the <math>\hat{e}_z</math> component through by length <math>(a_\ell)</math> and dividing through by the square of the velocity <math>(\pi G \rho_c a_\ell^2)</math>, we have, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td align="right"> | <td align="right"> | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
| Line 279: | Line 279: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td align="right"> | <td align="right"> | ||
| | ||
| Line 295: | Line 294: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td align="right"> | <td align="right"> | ||
<math> | <math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{\partial }{\partial \zeta}\biggl[ \frac{P}{(\pi G\rho_c^2 a_\ell^2)} \biggr] </math> | ||
\frac{ | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="center"> | <td align="center"> | ||
| Line 306: | Line 302: | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\cdot \frac{\partial }{\partial \zeta}\biggl[ \frac{\Phi}{(-~\pi G\rho_c a_\ell^2)} \biggr] | |||
</math> | </math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
| Line 312: | Line 308: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td align="right"> | <td align="right"> | ||
| |||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="center"> | <td align="center"> | ||
| Line 323: | Line 316: | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\frac{\ | \frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\cdot \biggl[ | ||
2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 )\chi^2 \zeta - 2A_s \zeta + 2(A_{s s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^3 | |||
</math> | \biggr] | ||
</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
Multiplying the <math>\hat{e}_\varpi</math> component through by length <math>(a_\ell)</math> and dividing through by the square of the velocity <math>(\pi G \rho_c a_\ell^2)</math>, we have, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td align=" | <td align="right"><math>{\hat{e}}_\varpi</math>: </td> | ||
<td align="right"> | <td align="right"> | ||
<math>\frac{\ | <math> | ||
\frac{j^2}{\varpi^3} \cdot \frac{a_\ell}{(\pi G\rho_c a_\ell^2)} | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="center"> | <td align="center"> | ||
= | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\biggl[1 | \biggl[ \frac{1}{\rho}\frac{\partial P}{\partial\varpi} + \frac{\partial \Phi_\mathrm{grav}}{\partial\varpi}\biggr] \frac{a_\ell}{(\pi G\rho_c a_\ell^2)} | ||
</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td align=" | <td align="right"> </td> | ||
<td align="right"> | <td align="right"> | ||
<math>\frac{ \ | <math>\Rightarrow ~~~ | ||
\frac{1}{\chi^3} \cdot \frac{j^2}{(\pi G\rho_c a_\ell^4)} | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="center"> | <td align="center"> | ||
= | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\frac{ | \frac{\rho_c}{\rho}\cdot\frac{\partial }{\partial \chi}\biggl[ \frac{P}{(\pi G\rho_c^2 a_\ell^2)} \biggr] | ||
- \frac{\partial }{\partial \chi}\biggl[ \frac{\Phi_\mathrm{grav}}{(-~\pi G\rho_c a_\ell^2)} \biggr] | |||
</math> | |||
\frac{\ | |||
\biggr] | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Revision as of 22:05, 7 November 2024
Parabolic Density Distribution
Part I: Gravitational Potential
|
Part II: Spherical Structures
|
Part III: Axisymmetric Equilibrium Structures |
Part IV: Triaxial Equilibrium Structures (Exploration)
|
Axisymmetric (Oblate) Equilibrium Structures
Tentative Summary
Known Relations
| Density: |
|
|
|
| Gravitational Potential: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and, |
|
|
|
| Vertical Pressure Gradient: |
|
where, and , and the relevant index symbol expressions are:
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where the eccentricity,
Drawing from our separate "6th Try" discussion — and as has been highlighted here for example — for the axisymmetric configurations under consideration, the and components of the Euler equation become, respectively,
|
Multiplying the component through by length and dividing through by the square of the velocity , we have,
|
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
Multiplying the component through by length and dividing through by the square of the velocity , we have,
| : |
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
Play With Vertical Pressure Gradient
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Integrate over gives …
|
|
||
|
|
Now Play With Radial Pressure Gradient
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
10th Try
Repeating Key Relations
| Density: |
|
|
|
| Gravitational Potential: |
|
|
|
| Vertical Pressure Gradient: |
|
From the above (9th Try) examination of the vertical pressure gradient, we determined that a reasonably good approximation for the normalized pressure throughout the configuration is given by the expression,
|
|
If we set — that is, if we look along the vertical axis — this approximation should be particularly good, resulting in the expression,
|
|
|
Note that in the limit that — that is, at the pole along the vertical (symmetry) axis where the should drop to zero — we should set . This allows us to determine the central pressure.
|
This means that, along the vertical axis, the pressure gradient is,
|
|
|
|
This should match the more general "vertical pressure gradient" expression when we set, , that is,
|
|
||
|
|
Yes! The expressions match!
See Also
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |