ParabolicDensity/Axisymmetric/Structure: Difference between revisions

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Line 690: Line 690:


<b><font color="red">Yes! The expressions match!</font></b>
<b><font color="red">Yes! The expressions match!</font></b>
====Compare Vertical Pressure Gradient Expressions====
From our [[#Starting_Key_Relations|above (9<sup>th</sup> try) derivation]] we know that the vertical pressure gradient is given by the expression,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\biggl[\frac{1}{(\pi G\rho_c^2 a_\ell^2)} \biggr] \frac{\partial P}{\partial \zeta}</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl[1 - \chi^2 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} \biggr] \biggl[
2A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^2\zeta - 2A_s \zeta 
+  2A_{ss} a_\ell^2  \zeta^3 
\biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl[ (2A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - 2A_s ) - (2A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^4 - 2A_s \chi^2)\biggr]\zeta 
+  \biggl[ 2A_{ss} a_\ell^2  -  2A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - (1-e^2)^{-1}(2A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^2 - 2A_s )\biggr]\zeta^3
+ \biggl[ - (1-e^2)^{-1}2A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \biggr] \zeta^5
\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl[ 2A_s (\chi^2-1) + 2A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 (1 - \chi^2)\chi^2 \biggr]\zeta 
+  \biggl[ 2A_{ss} a_\ell^2(1  -  \chi^2 )
- 2A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 (1-e^2)^{-1}\chi^2 + 2(1-e^2)^{-1}A_s \biggr]\zeta^3
+ \biggl[ - 2A_{ss} a_\ell^2 (1-e^2)^{-1}\biggr] \zeta^5
\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
By comparison, the vertical derivative of our "test01" pressure expression gives,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>P_\mathrm{test01}</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\chi^0 \biggl\{
P_c^* -A_s\zeta^2 + \frac{1}{2}\biggl[ A_{ss}a_\ell^2 + (1-e^2)^{-1}A_s\biggr]\zeta^4 - \frac{1}{3}A_{ss} a_\ell^2(1-e^2)^{-1}\zeta^6
\biggr\}
+ \chi^2 \biggl\{
-A_s(1-e^2) + \frac{1}{2}\biggl[ A_{ss}a_\ell^2 + (1-e^2)^{-1}A_s\biggr]2(1-e^2)\zeta^2 - A_{ss}a_\ell^2\zeta^4
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
+ \chi^4 \biggl\{
\frac{1}{2}\biggl[ A_{ss}a_\ell^2 + (1-e^2)^{-1}A_s\biggr](1-e^2)^2 - A_{ss} a_\ell^2(1-e^2)\zeta^2
\biggr\}
+ \chi^6 \biggl\{
- \frac{1}{3} A_{ss} a_\ell^2  (1-e^2)^2
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{\partial P_\mathrm{test01}}{\partial \zeta}</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\chi^0 \biggl\{
-2A_s\zeta + 2\biggl[ A_{ss}a_\ell^2 + (1-e^2)^{-1}A_s\biggr]\zeta^3 - 2A_{ss} a_\ell^2(1-e^2)^{-1}\zeta^5
\biggr\}
+ \chi^2 \biggl\{
2\biggl[ A_{ss}a_\ell^2 + (1-e^2)^{-1}A_s\biggr](1-e^2)\zeta - 4A_{ss}a_\ell^2\zeta^3
\biggr\}
+ \chi^4 \biggl\{
- 2A_{ss} a_\ell^2(1-e^2)\zeta
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\zeta^1\biggl\{
- 2A_s
+ 2\biggl[ A_{ss}a_\ell^2 + (1-e^2)^{-1}A_s\biggr](1-e^2)\chi^2
- 2A_{ss} a_\ell^2(1-e^2)\chi^4
\biggr\}
+
\zeta^3\biggl\{
2\biggl[ A_{ss}a_\ell^2 + (1-e^2)^{-1}A_s\biggr]
- 4A_{ss}a_\ell^2\chi^2
\biggr\}
+
\zeta^5\biggl\{
- 2A_{ss} a_\ell^2(1-e^2)^{-1}
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\zeta^1\biggl\{
2A_s (\chi^2- 1)
+ 2A_{ss}a_\ell^2(1-e^2)\chi^2 (1-\chi^2)
\biggr\}
+
\zeta^3\biggl\{
2A_{ss}a_\ell^2(1-2\chi^2) + 2(1-e^2)^{-1}A_s
\biggr\}
+
\zeta^5\biggl\{
- 2A_{ss} a_\ell^2(1-e^2)^{-1}
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
Instead, try &hellip;
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\frac{P_\mathrm{test02}}{P_c}</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
p_2 \biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)^2 + p_3\biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)^3 
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{\partial}{\partial \zeta}\biggl[\frac{P_\mathrm{test02}}{P_c}\biggr]</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
2p_2\biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)\frac{\partial}{\partial\zeta}\biggl[ \frac{\rho}{\rho_c} \biggr]
+
3p_3\biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)^2  \frac{\partial}{\partial\zeta}\biggl[ \frac{\rho}{\rho_c} \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)\biggl\{2p_2
+
3p_3\biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr) \biggr\} \frac{\partial}{\partial\zeta}\biggl[ \frac{\rho}{\rho_c} \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)\biggl\{2p_2
+
3p_3\biggl[1 - \chi^2 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} \biggr] \biggr\} \frac{\partial}{\partial\zeta}\biggl[ 1 - \chi^2 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)\biggl\{(2p_2 + 3p_3)
- 3p_3\chi^2 - 3p_3\zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1}  \biggr\}
\biggl[ - 2\zeta(1-e^2)^{-1} \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)(1-e^2)^{-2}\biggl\{
6p_3\chi^2\zeta(1-e^2) - 2(2p_2 + 3p_3)(1-e^2)\zeta  + 6p_3\zeta^3 
\biggr\}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
Compare the term inside the curly braces with the term, from the beginning of this subsection, inside the square brackets, namely,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>
2A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \chi^2\zeta
- 2A_s \zeta 
+  2A_{ss} a_\ell^2  \zeta^3 
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{2}{e^4} \biggl[(3-e^2) - \Upsilon \biggr]\chi^2\zeta - \biggl[\frac{4}{e^2}\biggl(1-\frac{1}{3}\Upsilon\biggr)\biggr] \zeta 
+ \frac{4}{3e^4}\biggl[\frac{4e^2-3}{(1-e^2)} + \Upsilon \biggr] \zeta^3 
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{3e^4(1-e^2)}\biggl\{
6 \biggl[(3-e^2) - \Upsilon \biggr](1-e^2)\chi^2\zeta - \biggl[12e^2\biggl(1-\frac{1}{3}\Upsilon\biggr)\biggr](1-e^2) \zeta 
+ 4\biggl[(4e^2-3) + \Upsilon \biggr] \zeta^3
\biggr\}  \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
<font color="red"><b>Pretty Close!!</b></font>
<table border="1" align="center" width="80%" cellpadding="5"><tr><td align="left">
Alternatively: &nbsp; according to the third term, we need to set,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>
6p_3
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
4\biggl[(4e^2-3) + \Upsilon \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>
\Rightarrow ~~~ \Upsilon
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{3}{2}p_3 + (3 - 4e^2)
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
in which case, the first coefficient must be given by the expression,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>
\biggl[(3-e^2) - \Upsilon \biggr]
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
(3-e^2) - \frac{3}{2}p_3 + (4e^2 - 3 ) \biggr]
=
\biggl[ 3e^2 - \frac{3}{2}p_3 \biggr] \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
And, from the second coefficient, we find,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>
2(2p_2 + 3p_3)
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl[12e^2\biggl(1-\frac{1}{3}\Upsilon\biggr)\biggr]</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>
\Rightarrow ~~~ 2p_2
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
2e^2\biggl(3-\Upsilon\biggr) - 3p_3
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- 3p_3 + 6e^2 - 2e^2\biggl[ \frac{3}{2}p_3 + (3 - 4e^2) \biggr]</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- 3p_3 + 6e^2 - \biggl[ 3e^2 p_3 + 6e^2 - 8e^4 \biggr]</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
8e^4 - 3p_3(1+e^2) \, ;</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
or,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>p_2</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
4e^4 - (1+e^2)\biggl[(4e^2-3) + \Upsilon \biggr] </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
4e^4 - (1+e^2)(4e^2-3) - (1+e^2)\Upsilon </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
4e^4 - [4e^2-3 + 4e^4-3e^2 ] - (1+e^2)\Upsilon </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
3 - e^2 - (1+e^2)\Upsilon </math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
----
SUMMARY:
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\frac{P_\mathrm{test02}}{P_c}</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
p_2 \biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)^2 + p_3\biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)^3  \, ,
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>p_2</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
3 - e^2 - (1+e^2)\Upsilon = e^4(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) - e^2\Upsilon \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>
p_3
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{2}{3}\biggl[(4e^2-3) + \Upsilon \biggr]
=
e^4(A_{ss}a_\ell^2) + \frac{2}{3}e^2\Upsilon \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</td></tr></table>
<table border="1" align="center" width="80%" cellpadding="5"><tr><td align="left">
Note: &nbsp; according to the first term, we need to set,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>
p_3
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl[(3-e^2) - \Upsilon \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>
\Rightarrow ~~~ \Upsilon
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl[(3-e^2) - p_3 \biggr] \, ,
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
in which case, the third coefficient must be given by the expression,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>
4\biggl[(4e^2-3) + \Upsilon \biggr]
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
4\biggl[(4e^2-3) + (3-e^2) - p_3 \biggr]
=
4\biggl[3e^2- p_3 \biggr] \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
And, from the second coefficient, we find,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>
2(2p_2 + 3p_3)
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl[12e^2\biggl(1-\frac{1}{3}\Upsilon\biggr)\biggr]</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>
\Rightarrow ~~~ 2p_2
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
2e^2\biggl(3-\Upsilon\biggr) - 3p_3
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
2e^2\biggl[3-[(3-e^2) - p_3]\biggr] - 3p_3</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
2e^2\biggl[e^2 + p_3\biggr] - 3p_3</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
2e^4 + (2e^2 - 3)p_3 \, ;
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
or,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
2p_2
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
2e^4 + (2e^2 - 3)\biggl[(3-e^2) - \Upsilon  \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
2e^4 + (2e^2 - 3)(3-e^2) - (2e^2 - 3)\Upsilon
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
2e^4 + (6e^2 - 2e^4 -9 +3e^2) - (2e^2 - 3)\Upsilon
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
9(e^2  -1 ) - (2e^2 - 3)\Upsilon
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</td></tr></table>
Better yet, try &hellip;
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\frac{P_\mathrm{test03}}{P_c}</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
p_2 \biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)^2 \biggl[ 1 - \beta\biggl(1 -  \frac{\rho}{\rho_c} \biggr)\biggr] 
=
p_2 \biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)^2 \biggl[ (1 - \beta) + \beta\biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c} \biggr)\biggr] 
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{\partial}{\partial \zeta}\biggl[\frac{P_\mathrm{test03}}{P_c}\biggr]</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\cdots</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
where, in the case of a [[SSC/Structure/OtherAnalyticModels#Pressure|spherically symmetric parabolic-density configuration]], <math>\beta = 1 / 2</math>.  Well &hellip; this wasn't a bad idea, but as it turns out, this "test03" expression is no different from the "test02" guess.  Specifically, the "test03" expression can be rewritten as,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\frac{P_\mathrm{test03}}{P_c}</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
p_2 (1 - \beta)\biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)^2 
+ p_2\beta \biggl(\frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\biggr)^3 \, ,
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
which has the same form as the "test02" expression.


====Test04====
====Test04====

Revision as of 20:13, 7 November 2024

Parabolic Density Distribution


Part I:   Gravitational Potential

 


Part II:   Spherical Structures

 


Part III:   Axisymmetric Equilibrium Structures

 Old: 1st thru 7th tries
 Old: 8th thru 10th tries


Part IV:   Triaxial Equilibrium Structures (Exploration)

 

Axisymmetric (Oblate) Equilibrium Structures

Tentative Summary

Known Relations

Density:

ρ(ϖ,z)ρc

=

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1],

Gravitational Potential:

Φgrav(ϖ,z)(−πGρcaℓ2)

=

12IBT−Aℓχ2−Asζ2+12[(Assaℓ2)ζ4+2(Aℓsaℓ2)χ2ζ2+(Aℓℓaℓ2)χ4].

Vertical Pressure Gradient: [1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ =

ρρc⋅[2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

where, χ≡ϖ/aℓ and ζ≡z/aℓ, and the relevant index symbol expressions are:

IBT =

2Aℓ+As(1−e2)=2(1−e2)1/2[sin−1ee];

Aℓ

=

1e2[sin−1ee−(1−e2)1/2](1−e2)1/2;

As =

2e2[(1−e2)−1/2−sin−1ee](1−e2)1/2;

aℓ2Aℓℓ

=

14e4{−(3+2e2)(1−e2)+3(1−e2)1/2[sin−1ee]};

32aℓ2Ass

=

(4e2−3)e4(1−e2)+3(1−e2)1/2e4[sin−1ee];

aℓ2Aℓs

=

1e4{(3−e2)−3(1−e2)1/2[sin−1ee]},

where the eccentricity,

e≡[1−(asaℓ)2]1/2.

Drawing from our separate "6th Try" discussion — and as has been highlighted here for example — for the axisymmetric configurations under consideration, the e^z and e^ϖ components of the Euler equation become, respectively,

e^z:    

0

=

[1ρ∂P∂z+∂Φ∂z]

e^ϖ:    

j2ϖ3

=

[1ρ∂P∂ϖ+∂Φ∂ϖ]

Multiplying through by length (aℓ) and dividing through by the square of the velocity (πGρcaℓ2), we have,

e^z:    

0

=

[1ρ∂P∂z+∂Φ∂z]aℓ(πGρcaℓ2)

 

 

=

ρcρ⋅∂∂ζ[P(πGρc2aℓ2)]−∂∂ζ[Φ(−πGρcaℓ2)]

e^ϖ:    

j2ϖ3⋅aℓ(πGρcaℓ2)

=

[1ρ∂P∂ϖ+∂Φ∂ϖ]aℓ(πGρcaℓ2)

 

⇒1χ3⋅j2(πGρcaℓ4)

=

ρcρ⋅∂∂χ[P(πGρc2aℓ2)]−∂∂χ[Φ(−πGρcaℓ2)]

9th Try

Starting Key Relations

Density:

ρ(ϖ,z)ρc

=

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1],

Gravitational Potential:

Φgrav(ϖ,z)(−πGρcaℓ2)

=

12IBT−Aℓχ2−Asζ2+12[(Assaℓ2)ζ4+2(Aℓsaℓ2)χ2ζ2+(Aℓℓaℓ2)χ4].

Vertical Pressure Gradient: [1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ =

ρρc⋅[2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

Play With Vertical Pressure Gradient

[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ =

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1][2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

  =

[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)ζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]−χ2[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)ζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]−ζ2(1−e2)−1[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)ζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

  =

(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)ζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3−(2Aℓsaℓ2χ4−2Asχ2)ζ−2Assaℓ2χ2ζ3−(1−e2)−1[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)ζ3+2Assaℓ2ζ5]

  =

[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)−(2Aℓsaℓ2χ4−2Asχ2)]ζ+[2Assaℓ2−2Assaℓ2χ2−(1−e2)−1(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)]ζ3+[−(1−e2)−12Assaℓ2]ζ5.

Integrate over ζ gives …

[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∫[∂P∂ζ]dζ =

[(Aℓsaℓ2χ2−As)−(Aℓsaℓ2χ4−Asχ2)]ζ2+12[Assaℓ2−Assaℓ2χ2−(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2χ2−As)]ζ4+13[−(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2]ζ6+const

  =

[−Asζ2+12Assaℓ2ζ4+12(1−e2)−1Asζ4−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ6]χ0+[Aℓsaℓ2ζ2+Asζ2−12Assaℓ2ζ4−12(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)]χ2+[−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2]χ4+const.

Now Play With Radial Pressure Gradient

[1(−πGρcaℓ2)]∂Φ∂χ =

ρρc⋅{−2Aℓχ+12[4(Aℓsaℓ2)ζ2χ+4(Aℓℓaℓ2)χ3]}

  =

2[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1][(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)χ+Aℓℓaℓ2χ3]

  =

2[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)χ+Aℓℓaℓ2χ3]−2χ2[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)χ+Aℓℓaℓ2χ3]−2ζ2(1−e2)−1[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)χ+Aℓℓaℓ2χ3]

  =

2(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)χ+2[Aℓℓaℓ2+(Aℓ−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2)]χ3−2Aℓℓaℓ2χ5+2(1−e2)−1[(Aℓζ2−Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)χ−Aℓℓaℓ2ζ2χ3]

  =

2[(Aℓsaℓ2ζ2−Aℓ)+(1−e2)−1(Aℓζ2−Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)]χ+2[Aℓℓaℓ2+(Aℓ−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2)−(1−e2)−1Aℓℓaℓ2ζ2]χ3−2Aℓℓaℓ2χ5

10th Try

Repeating Key Relations

Density:

ρ(ϖ,z)ρc

=

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1],

Gravitational Potential:

Φgrav(ϖ,z)(−πGρcaℓ2)

=

12IBT−Aℓχ2−Asζ2+12[(Assaℓ2)ζ4+2(Aℓsaℓ2)χ2ζ2+(Aℓℓaℓ2)χ4].

Vertical Pressure Gradient: [1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ =

ρρc⋅[2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

From the above (9th Try) examination of the vertical pressure gradient, we determined that a reasonably good approximation for the normalized pressure throughout the configuration is given by the expression,

[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∫[∂P∂ζ]dζ =

[−Asζ2+12Assaℓ2ζ4+12(1−e2)−1Asζ4−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ6]χ0+[Aℓsaℓ2ζ2+Asζ2−12Assaℓ2ζ4−12(1−e2)−1(Aℓsaℓ2ζ4)]χ2+[−Aℓsaℓ2ζ2]χ4+const.

If we set χ=0 — that is, if we look along the vertical axis — this approximation should be particularly good, resulting in the expression,

Pz≡{[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∫[∂P∂ζ]dζ}χ=0 =

Pc*−Asζ2+12Assaℓ2ζ4+12(1−e2)−1Asζ4−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ6.

Note that in the limit that z→as — that is, at the pole along the vertical (symmetry) axis where the Pz should drop to zero — we should set ζ→(1−e2)1/2. This allows us to determine the central pressure.

Pc* =

As(1−e2)−12Assaℓ2(1−e2)2−12(1−e2)−1As(1−e2)2+13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2(1−e2)3

  =

As(1−e2)−12As(1−e2)+13Assaℓ2(1−e2)2−12Assaℓ2(1−e2)2

  =

12As(1−e2)−16Assaℓ2(1−e2)2.

This means that, along the vertical axis, the pressure gradient is,

Pz≡{[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∫[∂P∂ζ]dζ}χ=0 =

Pc*−Asζ2+12Assaℓ2ζ4+12(1−e2)−1Asζ4−13(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ6.

∂Pz∂ζ =

−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3+2(1−e2)−1Asζ3−2(1−e2)−1Assaℓ2ζ5.

This should match the more general "vertical pressure gradient" expression when we set, χ=0, that is,

{[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ}χ=0 =

[1−χ20−ζ2(1−e2)−1]⋅[2Aℓsaℓ2ζχ20−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

  =

[−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]+ζ2(1−e2)−1[2Asζ−2Assaℓ2ζ3]

Yes! The expressions match!

Test04

From above, we understand that, analytically,

[1(πGρc2aℓ2)]∂P∂ζ =

[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1][2Aℓsaℓ2χ2ζ−2Asζ+2Assaℓ2ζ3]

  =

[(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)−(2Aℓsaℓ2χ4−2Asχ2)]ζ+[2Assaℓ2−2Assaℓ2χ2−(1−e2)−1(2Aℓsaℓ2χ2−2As)]ζ3+[−(1−e2)−12Assaℓ2]ζ5

  =

[2As(χ2−1)+2Aℓsaℓ2(1−χ2)χ2]ζ+[2Assaℓ2(1−χ2)−2Aℓsaℓ2(1−e2)−1χ2+2(1−e2)−1As]ζ3+[−2Assaℓ2(1−e2)−1]ζ5.

Also from above, we have shown that if,

Ptest02Pc =

p2(ρρc)2+p3(ρρc)3

SUMMARY from test02:

p2

=

3−e2−(1+e2)Υ=e4(Aℓsaℓ2)−e2Υ,

p3 =

23[(4e2−3)+Υ]=e4(Assaℓ2)+23e2Υ.

⇒∂∂ζ[Ptest02Pc] =

(ρρc)(1−e2)−2{6p3χ2ζ(1−e2)−2(2p2+3p3)(1−e2)ζ+6p3ζ3}

  =

(ρρc)(1−e2)−2{6[e4(Assaℓ2)+23e2Υ]χ2ζ(1−e2)−2[2e4(Aℓsaℓ2)+3e4(Assaℓ2)](1−e2)ζ+6[e4(Assaℓ2)+23e2Υ]ζ3}




Here (test04), we add a term that is linear in the normalized density, which means,

Ptest04Pc =

Ptest02Pc+p1(ρρc)

⇒∂∂ζ[Ptest04Pc] =

∂∂ζ[Ptest02Pc]+∂∂ζ[p1(ρρc)]=∂∂ζ[Ptest02Pc]+p1∂∂ζ[1−χ2−ζ2(1−e2)−1]

See Also

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |