|
|
| Line 511: |
Line 511: |
| </table> | | </table> |
|
| |
|
| ====Compare Pair of Integrations====
| |
|
| |
| <table border="1" align="center" cellpadding="8">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="center" width="6%"> </td>
| |
| <td align="center" width="47%">Integration over <math>\zeta</math></td>
| |
| <td align="center">Integration over <math>\chi</math></td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>\chi^0</math></td>
| |
| <td align="right"><math>-A_s \zeta^2 + \frac{1}{2}A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 + \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}A_s\zeta^4 - \frac{1}{3}(1-e^2)^{-1}A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \zeta^6 </math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">none</td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>\chi^2</math></td>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 + A_s\zeta^2 - \frac{1}{2}A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 - \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 )</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>(A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 - A_\ell ) + (1-e^2)^{-1}(A_\ell\zeta^2 - A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 ) - \frac{1}{2}j_4^2\zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} + \frac{1}{2}j_4^2</math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>\chi^4</math></td>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>- A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>\frac{1}{2}A_{\ell\ell} a_\ell^2 + \frac{1}{2}(A_\ell - A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 ) - \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}A_{\ell\ell} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2
| |
| - \frac{1}{4}j_4^2 - \frac{1}{4}j_6^2\zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} + \frac{1}{4}j_6^2 </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>\chi^6</math></td>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| none
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| - \frac{1}{6}j_6^2 - \frac{1}{3}A_{\ell\ell} a_\ell^2
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
|
| |
| Try, <math>j_6^2 = [-2A_{\ell\ell}a_\ell^2]</math> and <math>\frac{1}{2}j_4^2 = [A_\ell + (A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^2 ]</math>.
| |
|
| |
| <table border="1" align="center" cellpadding="8">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="center" width="6%"> </td>
| |
| <td align="center" width="47%">Integration over <math>\zeta</math></td>
| |
| <td align="center">Integration over <math>\chi</math></td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>\chi^0</math></td>
| |
| <td align="right"><math>-A_s \zeta^2 + \frac{1}{2}A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 + \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}A_s\zeta^4 - \frac{1}{3}(1-e^2)^{-1}A_{ss} a_\ell^2 \zeta^6 </math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">none</td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>\chi^2</math></td>
| |
| <td align="right"><math>A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 + A_s\zeta^2
| |
| - \frac{1}{2}A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 - \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 )</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| (A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 - A_\ell ) + (1-e^2)^{-1}(A_\ell\zeta^2 - A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 ) - \frac{1}{2}j_4^2\zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} + \frac{1}{2}j_4^2
| |
| </math>
| |
| <br /><math>=</math><br />
| |
| <math>
| |
| (A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 - A_\ell ) + (1-e^2)^{-1}(A_\ell\zeta^2 - A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 ) - [A_\ell + (A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^2 ]\zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} + [A_\ell + (A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^2 ]
| |
| </math>
| |
| <br /><math>=</math><br />
| |
| <math>
| |
| 2(A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^2\biggl[1 - \zeta^2 (1-e^2)^{-1} \biggr]
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>\chi^4</math></td>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>- A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{1}{2}A_{\ell\ell} a_\ell^2 + \frac{1}{2}(A_\ell - A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 ) - \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}A_{\ell\ell} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2
| |
| - \frac{1}{4}j_4^2 - \frac{1}{4}[-2A_{\ell\ell}a_\ell^2]\zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} + \frac{1}{4}[-2A_{\ell\ell}a_\ell^2]
| |
| </math>
| |
| <br /><math>=</math><br />
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{1}{4}\biggl[2(A_\ell - A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 ) - 2[A_\ell + (A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^2 ] \biggr] = - A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^2
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>\chi^6</math></td>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| none
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| 0
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
|
| |
| What expression for <math>j_4^2</math> is required in order to ensure that the <math>\chi^2</math> term is the same in both columns?
| |
|
| |
| <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right"><math>
| |
| \frac{1}{2}j_4^2 \biggl[ 1 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1}\biggr]</math></td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \biggl[ A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 + A_s\zeta^2 - \frac{1}{2}A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 - \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 )\biggr]
| |
| -
| |
| \biggl[(A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 - A_\ell ) + (1-e^2)^{-1}(A_\ell\zeta^2 - A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 ) \biggr]
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right"> </td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \biggl[ A_s\zeta^2 - \frac{1}{2}A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 - \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 )\biggr]
| |
| +
| |
| \biggl[( A_\ell ) - (1-e^2)^{-1}(A_\ell\zeta^2 ) + (1-e^2)^{-1}( A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 ) \biggr]
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right"> </td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \biggl[ A_s\zeta^2 - \frac{1}{2}A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 + \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \zeta^4\biggr]
| |
| +
| |
| A_\ell\biggl[1 - (1-e^2)^{-1}\zeta^2 \biggr]
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right"><math>
| |
| \Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{1}{2}j_4^2 \biggl[ 1 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1}\biggr]
| |
| -
| |
| A_\ell\biggl[1 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} \biggr]
| |
| </math></td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \zeta^4
| |
| + \biggl[ A_s \biggr]\zeta^2
| |
| - \frac{1}{2}\biggl[ A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \biggr] \zeta^4
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
| Now, considering the following three relations …
| |
|
| |
| <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{3}{2}(A_{ss}a_\ell^2)
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| (1-e^2)^{-1} - (A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \, ;
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>
| |
| A_s
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| A_\ell + e^2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \, ;
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
| <math>
| |
| e^2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2)
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| 2 - 3 A_\ell \, ;
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
| we can write,
| |
|
| |
| <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right"><math>
| |
| \frac{1}{2}j_4^2 \biggl[ 1 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1}\biggr]
| |
| -
| |
| A_\ell\biggl[1 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} \biggr]
| |
| </math></td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \zeta^4
| |
| + \biggl[ A_\ell + e^2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \biggr]\zeta^2
| |
| - \frac{1}{3}\biggl[ (1-e^2)^{-1} - (A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2)\biggr] \zeta^4
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right"><math>\Rightarrow ~~~
| |
| 3j_4^2 \biggl[ 1 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1}\biggr]
| |
| -
| |
| 3A_\ell\biggl[2 - 2\zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} \biggr]
| |
| </math></td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| 3(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \zeta^4
| |
| + 6\biggl[ A_\ell + e^2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \biggr]\zeta^2
| |
| - 2\biggl[ (1-e^2)^{-1} - (A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2)\biggr] \zeta^4
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
|
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| (A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2)\biggl\{2\zeta^4 + 3\zeta^4(1-e^2)^{-1} + 6 e^2\zeta^2 \biggr\}
| |
| - 2\zeta^4 (1-e^2)^{-1} + 6A_\ell \zeta^2
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
|
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| - 2\zeta^4 (1-e^2)^{-1} + 6A_\ell \zeta^2
| |
| +
| |
| \biggl[2 - 3A_\ell \biggr]\biggl\{2\zeta^4 + 3\zeta^4(1-e^2)^{-1} + 6 e^2\zeta^2 \biggr\}\frac{1}{e^2}
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right">
| |
|
| |
| </td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| - 2\zeta^4 (1-e^2)^{-1}
| |
| - 3A_\ell\biggl\{2\zeta^4 + 3\zeta^4(1-e^2)^{-1} + 4 e^2\zeta^2 \biggr\}\frac{1}{e^2}
| |
| +
| |
| \biggl\{4\zeta^4 + 6\zeta^4(1-e^2)^{-1} + 12 e^2\zeta^2 \biggr\}\frac{1}{e^2}
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8">
| |
|
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td align="right"><math>\Rightarrow ~~~
| |
| 3j_4^2 \biggl[ 1 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1}\biggr]
| |
| </math></td>
| |
| <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
| |
| <td align="left">
| |
| <math>
| |
| - 2\zeta^4 (1-e^2)^{-1}
| |
| + \frac{3A_\ell(1-e^2)^{-1}}{e^2}\biggl\{
| |
| \biggl[2e^2(1-e^2) - 2e^2\zeta^2 \biggr]
| |
| - \biggl[2\zeta^4(1-e^2) + 3\zeta^4 + 4 e^2(1-e^2)\zeta^2 \biggr]
| |
| \biggr\}
| |
| +
| |
| \biggl\{4\zeta^4 + 6\zeta^4(1-e^2)^{-1} + 12 e^2\zeta^2 \biggr\}\frac{1}{e^2}
| |
| </math>
| |
| </td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
| ===10<sup>th</sup> Try=== | | ===10<sup>th</sup> Try=== |
|
| |
|
Parabolic Density Distribution
Axisymmetric (Oblate) Equilibrium Structures
Tentative Summary
Known Relations
| Density: |
|
|
|
| Gravitational Potential: |
|
|
|
| Vertical Pressure Gradient: |
|
|
|
where, and , and the relevant index symbol expressions are:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where the eccentricity,
Drawing from our separate "6th Try" discussion — and as has been highlighted here for example — for the axisymmetric configurations under consideration, the and components of the Euler equation become, respectively,
| : |
|
=
|
|
| : |
|
=
|
|
|
Multiplying through by length and dividing through by the square of the velocity , we have,
| : |
|
=
|
|
| |
|
=
|
|
| : |
|
=
|
|
| |
|
=
|
|
9th Try
Starting Key Relations
| Density: |
|
|
|
| Gravitational Potential: |
|
|
|
| Vertical Pressure Gradient: |
|
|
|
Play With Vertical Pressure Gradient
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Integrate over gives …
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Now Play With Radial Pressure Gradient
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
10th Try
Repeating Key Relations
| Density: |
|
|
|
| Gravitational Potential: |
|
|
|
| Vertical Pressure Gradient: |
|
|
|
From the above (9th Try) examination of the vertical pressure gradient, we determined that a reasonably good approximation for the normalized pressure throughout the configuration is given by the expression,
|
|
|
If we set — that is, if we look along the vertical axis — this approximation should be particularly good, resulting in the expression,
|
|
|
|
Note that in the limit that — that is, at the pole along the vertical (symmetry) axis where the should drop to zero — we should set . This allows us to determine the central pressure.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
This means that, along the vertical axis, the pressure gradient is,
|
|
|
|
|
|
This should match the more general "vertical pressure gradient" expression when we set, , that is,
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Yes! The expressions match!
Shift to ξ1 Coordinate
In an accompanying chapter, we defined the coordinate,
|
|
|
Given that we want the pressure to be constant on surfaces, it seems plausible that should be replaced by in the expression for . That is, we might expect the expression for the pressure at any point in the meridional plane to be,
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Integration over |
Pressure Guess |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none
|
|
Compare Vertical Pressure Gradient Expressions
From our above (9th try) derivation we know that the vertical pressure gradient is given by the expression,
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
By comparison, the vertical derivative of our "test01" pressure expression gives,
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Instead, try …
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Compare the term inside the curly braces with the term, from the beginning of this subsection, inside the square brackets, namely,
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Pretty Close!!
|
Alternatively: according to the third term, we need to set,
|
|
|
|
|
|
in which case, the first coefficient must be given by the expression,
|
|
|
And, from the second coefficient, we find,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: according to the first term, we need to set,
|
|
|
|
|
|
in which case, the third coefficient must be given by the expression,
|
|
|
And, from the second coefficient, we find,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Better yet, try …
|
|
|
|
|
|
where, in the case of a spherically symmetric parabolic-density configuration, . Well … this wasn't a bad idea, but as it turns out, this "test03" expression is no different from the "test02" guess. Specifically, the "test03" expression can be rewritten as,
|
|
|
which has the same form as the "test02" expression.
Test04
From above, we understand that, analytically,
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Also from above, we have shown that if,
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY from test02:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Here (test04), we add a term that is linear in the normalized density, which means,
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Also