ParabolicDensity/Axisymmetric/Structure: Difference between revisions

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Line 511: Line 511:
</table>
</table>


====Compare Pair of Integrations====
<table border="1" align="center" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
  <td align="center" width="6%">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center" width="47%">Integration over <math>\zeta</math></td>
  <td align="center">Integration over <math>\chi</math></td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center"><math>\chi^0</math></td>
  <td align="right"><math>-A_s \zeta^2 + \frac{1}{2}A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 + \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}A_s\zeta^4 - \frac{1}{3}(1-e^2)^{-1}A_{ss} a_\ell^2  \zeta^6 </math></td>
  <td align="left">none</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center"><math>\chi^2</math></td>
  <td align="right">
<math>A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 + A_s\zeta^2 - \frac{1}{2}A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 - \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 )</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>(A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 - A_\ell ) + (1-e^2)^{-1}(A_\ell\zeta^2 - A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 ) - \frac{1}{2}j_4^2\zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} + \frac{1}{2}j_4^2</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center"><math>\chi^4</math></td>
  <td align="right">
<math>- A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 </math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\frac{1}{2}A_{\ell\ell} a_\ell^2 + \frac{1}{2}(A_\ell - A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 ) - \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}A_{\ell\ell} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2
- \frac{1}{4}j_4^2 - \frac{1}{4}j_6^2\zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} + \frac{1}{4}j_6^2  </math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center"><math>\chi^6</math></td>
  <td align="right">
none
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- \frac{1}{6}j_6^2 - \frac{1}{3}A_{\ell\ell} a_\ell^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
Try, <math>j_6^2 = [-2A_{\ell\ell}a_\ell^2]</math> and <math>\frac{1}{2}j_4^2 = [A_\ell + (A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^2 ]</math>.
<table border="1" align="center" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
  <td align="center" width="6%">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center" width="47%">Integration over <math>\zeta</math></td>
  <td align="center">Integration over <math>\chi</math></td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center"><math>\chi^0</math></td>
  <td align="right"><math>-A_s \zeta^2 + \frac{1}{2}A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 + \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}A_s\zeta^4 - \frac{1}{3}(1-e^2)^{-1}A_{ss} a_\ell^2  \zeta^6 </math></td>
  <td align="left">none</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center"><math>\chi^2</math></td>
  <td align="right"><math>A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 + A_s\zeta^2
- \frac{1}{2}A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 - \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 )</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
(A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 - A_\ell ) + (1-e^2)^{-1}(A_\ell\zeta^2 - A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 ) - \frac{1}{2}j_4^2\zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} + \frac{1}{2}j_4^2
</math>
<br /><math>=</math><br />
<math>
(A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 - A_\ell ) + (1-e^2)^{-1}(A_\ell\zeta^2 - A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 ) - [A_\ell + (A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^2 ]\zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} + [A_\ell + (A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^2 ]
</math>
<br /><math>=</math><br />
<math>
2(A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^2\biggl[1 - \zeta^2 (1-e^2)^{-1} \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center"><math>\chi^4</math></td>
  <td align="right">
<math>- A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 </math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2}A_{\ell\ell} a_\ell^2 + \frac{1}{2}(A_\ell - A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 ) - \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}A_{\ell\ell} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2
- \frac{1}{4}j_4^2 - \frac{1}{4}[-2A_{\ell\ell}a_\ell^2]\zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} + \frac{1}{4}[-2A_{\ell\ell}a_\ell^2] 
</math>
<br /><math>=</math><br />
<math>
\frac{1}{4}\biggl[2(A_\ell - A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 ) - 2[A_\ell + (A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2) \zeta^2 ] \biggr] = - A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="center"><math>\chi^6</math></td>
  <td align="right">
none
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
0
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
What expression for <math>j_4^2</math> is required in order to ensure that the <math>\chi^2</math> term is the same in both columns?
<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>
\frac{1}{2}j_4^2 \biggl[ 1 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1}\biggr]</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl[ A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 + A_s\zeta^2 - \frac{1}{2}A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 - \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 )\biggr]
-
\biggl[(A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^2 - A_\ell ) + (1-e^2)^{-1}(A_\ell\zeta^2 - A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 )  \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl[ A_s\zeta^2 - \frac{1}{2}A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 - \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 )\biggr]
+
\biggl[( A_\ell ) - (1-e^2)^{-1}(A_\ell\zeta^2 ) + (1-e^2)^{-1}( A_{\ell s} a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 ) \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl[ A_s\zeta^2 - \frac{1}{2}A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \zeta^4 + \frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \zeta^4\biggr]
+
A_\ell\biggl[1 - (1-e^2)^{-1}\zeta^2 \biggr]
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>
\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{1}{2}j_4^2 \biggl[ 1 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1}\biggr]
-
A_\ell\biggl[1 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} \biggr]
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \zeta^4
+ \biggl[ A_s \biggr]\zeta^2
- \frac{1}{2}\biggl[ A_{ss}a_\ell^2 \biggr] \zeta^4
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
Now, considering the following three relations &hellip;
<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
\frac{3}{2}(A_{ss}a_\ell^2)
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
(1-e^2)^{-1} - (A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \, ;
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
A_s
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
A_\ell + e^2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \, ;
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
e^2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2)
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
2 - 3 A_\ell \, ;
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
we can write,
<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>
\frac{1}{2}j_4^2 \biggl[ 1 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1}\biggr]
-
A_\ell\biggl[1 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} \biggr]
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\frac{1}{2}(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \zeta^4
+ \biggl[ A_\ell + e^2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \biggr]\zeta^2
- \frac{1}{3}\biggl[ (1-e^2)^{-1} - (A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2)\biggr] \zeta^4
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\Rightarrow ~~~
3j_4^2 \biggl[ 1 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1}\biggr]
-
3A_\ell\biggl[2 - 2\zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1} \biggr]
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
3(1-e^2)^{-1}(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \zeta^4
+ 6\biggl[ A_\ell + e^2(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2) \biggr]\zeta^2
- 2\biggl[ (1-e^2)^{-1} - (A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2)\biggr] \zeta^4
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
(A_{\ell s}a_\ell^2)\biggl\{2\zeta^4 + 3\zeta^4(1-e^2)^{-1} + 6 e^2\zeta^2 \biggr\}
- 2\zeta^4 (1-e^2)^{-1} + 6A_\ell \zeta^2
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- 2\zeta^4 (1-e^2)^{-1} + 6A_\ell \zeta^2
+
\biggl[2 - 3A_\ell  \biggr]\biggl\{2\zeta^4 + 3\zeta^4(1-e^2)^{-1} + 6 e^2\zeta^2 \biggr\}\frac{1}{e^2}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- 2\zeta^4 (1-e^2)^{-1} 
- 3A_\ell\biggl\{2\zeta^4 + 3\zeta^4(1-e^2)^{-1} + 4 e^2\zeta^2 \biggr\}\frac{1}{e^2}
+
\biggl\{4\zeta^4 + 6\zeta^4(1-e^2)^{-1} + 12 e^2\zeta^2 \biggr\}\frac{1}{e^2}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\Rightarrow ~~~
3j_4^2 \biggl[ 1 - \zeta^2(1-e^2)^{-1}\biggr]
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
- 2\zeta^4 (1-e^2)^{-1}
+ \frac{3A_\ell(1-e^2)^{-1}}{e^2}\biggl\{
\biggl[2e^2(1-e^2) - 2e^2\zeta^2 \biggr]
- \biggl[2\zeta^4(1-e^2) + 3\zeta^4 + 4 e^2(1-e^2)\zeta^2 \biggr]
\biggr\}
+
\biggl\{4\zeta^4 + 6\zeta^4(1-e^2)^{-1} + 12 e^2\zeta^2 \biggr\}\frac{1}{e^2}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
===10<sup>th</sup> Try===
===10<sup>th</sup> Try===



Revision as of 21:08, 7 November 2024

Parabolic Density Distribution


Part I:   Gravitational Potential

 


Part II:   Spherical Structures

 


Part III:   Axisymmetric Equilibrium Structures

 Old: 1st thru 7th tries
 Old: 8th thru 10th tries


Part IV:   Triaxial Equilibrium Structures (Exploration)

 

Axisymmetric (Oblate) Equilibrium Structures

Tentative Summary

Known Relations

Density:

ρ(ϖ,z)ρc

=

[1χ2ζ2(1e2)1],

Gravitational Potential:

Φgrav(ϖ,z)(πGρca2)

=

12IBTAχ2Asζ2+12[(Assa2)ζ4+2(Asa2)χ2ζ2+(Aa2)χ4].

Vertical Pressure Gradient: [1(πGρc2a2)]Pζ =

ρρc[2Asa2χ2ζ2Asζ+2Assa2ζ3]

where, χϖ/a and ζz/a, and the relevant index symbol expressions are:

IBT =

2A+As(1e2)=2(1e2)1/2[sin1ee];

A

=

1e2[sin1ee(1e2)1/2](1e2)1/2;

As =

2e2[(1e2)1/2sin1ee](1e2)1/2;

a2A

=

14e4{(3+2e2)(1e2)+3(1e2)1/2[sin1ee]};

32a2Ass

=

(4e23)e4(1e2)+3(1e2)1/2e4[sin1ee];

a2As

=

1e4{(3e2)3(1e2)1/2[sin1ee]},

where the eccentricity,

e[1(asa)2]1/2.

Drawing from our separate "6th Try" discussion — and as has been highlighted here for example — for the axisymmetric configurations under consideration, the e^z and e^ϖ components of the Euler equation become, respectively,

e^z:    

0

=

[1ρPz+Φz]

e^ϖ:    

j2ϖ3

=

[1ρPϖ+Φϖ]

Multiplying through by length (a) and dividing through by the square of the velocity (πGρca2), we have,

e^z:    

0

=

[1ρPz+Φz]a(πGρca2)

 

 

=

ρcρζ[P(πGρc2a2)]ζ[Φ(πGρca2)]

e^ϖ:    

j2ϖ3a(πGρca2)

=

[1ρPϖ+Φϖ]a(πGρca2)

 

1χ3j2(πGρca4)

=

ρcρχ[P(πGρc2a2)]χ[Φ(πGρca2)]

9th Try

Starting Key Relations

Density:

ρ(ϖ,z)ρc

=

[1χ2ζ2(1e2)1],

Gravitational Potential:

Φgrav(ϖ,z)(πGρca2)

=

12IBTAχ2Asζ2+12[(Assa2)ζ4+2(Asa2)χ2ζ2+(Aa2)χ4].

Vertical Pressure Gradient: [1(πGρc2a2)]Pζ =

ρρc[2Asa2χ2ζ2Asζ+2Assa2ζ3]

Play With Vertical Pressure Gradient

[1(πGρc2a2)]Pζ =

[1χ2ζ2(1e2)1][2Asa2χ2ζ2Asζ+2Assa2ζ3]

  =

[(2Asa2χ22As)ζ+2Assa2ζ3]χ2[(2Asa2χ22As)ζ+2Assa2ζ3]ζ2(1e2)1[(2Asa2χ22As)ζ+2Assa2ζ3]

  =

(2Asa2χ22As)ζ+2Assa2ζ3(2Asa2χ42Asχ2)ζ2Assa2χ2ζ3(1e2)1[(2Asa2χ22As)ζ3+2Assa2ζ5]

  =

[(2Asa2χ22As)(2Asa2χ42Asχ2)]ζ+[2Assa22Assa2χ2(1e2)1(2Asa2χ22As)]ζ3+[(1e2)12Assa2]ζ5.

Integrate over ζ gives …

[1(πGρc2a2)][Pζ]dζ =

[(Asa2χ2As)(Asa2χ4Asχ2)]ζ2+12[Assa2Assa2χ2(1e2)1(Asa2χ2As)]ζ4+13[(1e2)1Assa2]ζ6+const

  =

[Asζ2+12Assa2ζ4+12(1e2)1Asζ413(1e2)1Assa2ζ6]χ0+[Asa2ζ2+Asζ212Assa2ζ412(1e2)1(Asa2ζ4)]χ2+[Asa2ζ2]χ4+const.

Now Play With Radial Pressure Gradient

[1(πGρca2)]Φχ =

ρρc{2Aχ+12[4(Asa2)ζ2χ+4(Aa2)χ3]}

  =

2[1χ2ζ2(1e2)1][(Asa2ζ2A)χ+Aa2χ3]

  =

2[(Asa2ζ2A)χ+Aa2χ3]2χ2[(Asa2ζ2A)χ+Aa2χ3]2ζ2(1e2)1[(Asa2ζ2A)χ+Aa2χ3]

  =

2(Asa2ζ2A)χ+2[Aa2+(AAsa2ζ2)]χ32Aa2χ5+2(1e2)1[(Aζ2Asa2ζ4)χAa2ζ2χ3]

  =

2[(Asa2ζ2A)+(1e2)1(Aζ2Asa2ζ4)]χ+2[Aa2+(AAsa2ζ2)(1e2)1Aa2ζ2]χ32Aa2χ5

10th Try

Repeating Key Relations

Density:

ρ(ϖ,z)ρc

=

[1χ2ζ2(1e2)1],

Gravitational Potential:

Φgrav(ϖ,z)(πGρca2)

=

12IBTAχ2Asζ2+12[(Assa2)ζ4+2(Asa2)χ2ζ2+(Aa2)χ4].

Vertical Pressure Gradient: [1(πGρc2a2)]Pζ =

ρρc[2Asa2χ2ζ2Asζ+2Assa2ζ3]

From the above (9th Try) examination of the vertical pressure gradient, we determined that a reasonably good approximation for the normalized pressure throughout the configuration is given by the expression,

[1(πGρc2a2)][Pζ]dζ =

[Asζ2+12Assa2ζ4+12(1e2)1Asζ413(1e2)1Assa2ζ6]χ0+[Asa2ζ2+Asζ212Assa2ζ412(1e2)1(Asa2ζ4)]χ2+[Asa2ζ2]χ4+const.

If we set χ=0 — that is, if we look along the vertical axis — this approximation should be particularly good, resulting in the expression,

Pz{[1(πGρc2a2)][Pζ]dζ}χ=0 =

Pc*Asζ2+12Assa2ζ4+12(1e2)1Asζ413(1e2)1Assa2ζ6.

Note that in the limit that zas — that is, at the pole along the vertical (symmetry) axis where the Pz should drop to zero — we should set ζ(1e2)1/2. This allows us to determine the central pressure.

Pc* =

As(1e2)12Assa2(1e2)212(1e2)1As(1e2)2+13(1e2)1Assa2(1e2)3

  =

As(1e2)12As(1e2)+13Assa2(1e2)212Assa2(1e2)2

  =

12As(1e2)16Assa2(1e2)2.

This means that, along the vertical axis, the pressure gradient is,

Pz{[1(πGρc2a2)][Pζ]dζ}χ=0 =

Pc*Asζ2+12Assa2ζ4+12(1e2)1Asζ413(1e2)1Assa2ζ6.

Pzζ =

2Asζ+2Assa2ζ3+2(1e2)1Asζ32(1e2)1Assa2ζ5.

This should match the more general "vertical pressure gradient" expression when we set, χ=0, that is,

{[1(πGρc2a2)]Pζ}χ=0 =

[1χ20ζ2(1e2)1][2Asa2ζχ202Asζ+2Assa2ζ3]

  =

[2Asζ+2Assa2ζ3]+ζ2(1e2)1[2Asζ2Assa2ζ3]

Yes! The expressions match!

Shift to ξ1 Coordinate

In an accompanying chapter, we defined the coordinate,

(ξ1as)2

(ϖa)2+(zas)2=χ2+ζ2(1e2)1.

Given that we want the pressure to be constant on ξ1 surfaces, it seems plausible that ζ2 should be replaced by (1e2)(ξ1/as)2=[(1e2)χ2+ζ2] in the expression for Pz. That is, we might expect the expression for the pressure at any point in the meridional plane to be,

Ptest01 =

Pc*As[(1e2)χ2+ζ2]1+12[Assa2+(1e2)1As][(1e2)χ2+ζ2]213(1e2)1Assa2[(1e2)χ2+ζ2]3

  =

Pc*As[(1e2)χ2+ζ2]1+12[Assa2+(1e2)1As][(1e2)2χ4+2(1e2)χ2ζ2+ζ4]13(1e2)1Assa2[(1e2)χ2+ζ2][(1e2)2χ4+2(1e2)χ2ζ2+ζ4]

  =

Pc*As[(1e2)χ2+ζ2]+12[Assa2+(1e2)1As][(1e2)2χ4+2(1e2)χ2ζ2+ζ4]

   

13Assa2[(1e2)2χ6+2(1e2)χ4ζ2+χ2ζ4]13Assa2[(1e2)χ4ζ2+2χ2ζ4+(1e2)1ζ6]

  =

χ0{Pc*Asζ2+12[Assa2+(1e2)1As]ζ413Assa2(1e2)1ζ6}+χ2{As(1e2)+12[Assa2+(1e2)1As]2(1e2)ζ213Assa2ζ423Assa2ζ4}

   

+χ4{12[Assa2+(1e2)1As](1e2)223Assa2(1e2)ζ213Assa2(1e2)ζ2}+χ6{13Assa2(1e2)2}

  =

χ0{Pc*Asζ2+12[Assa2+(1e2)1As]ζ413Assa2(1e2)1ζ6}+χ2{As(1e2)+12[Assa2+(1e2)1As]2(1e2)ζ2Assa2ζ4}

   

+χ4{12[Assa2+(1e2)1As](1e2)2Assa2(1e2)ζ2}+χ6{13Assa2(1e2)2}

  Integration over ζ Pressure Guess
χ0 Asζ2+12Assa2ζ4+12(1e2)1Asζ413(1e2)1Assa2ζ6

Pc*Asζ2+12[Assa2+(1e2)1As]ζ413Assa2(1e2)1ζ6

χ2

Asa2ζ2+Asζ212Assa2ζ412(1e2)1(Asa2ζ4)

As(1e2)+12[Assa2+(1e2)1As]2(1e2)ζ2Assa2ζ4

χ4

Asa2ζ2

12[Assa2+(1e2)1As](1e2)2Assa2(1e2)ζ2

χ6

none

13Assa2(1e2)2

Compare Vertical Pressure Gradient Expressions

From our above (9th try) derivation we know that the vertical pressure gradient is given by the expression,

[1(πGρc2a2)]Pζ =

[1χ2ζ2(1e2)1][2Asa2χ2ζ2Asζ+2Assa2ζ3]

  =

[(2Asa2χ22As)(2Asa2χ42Asχ2)]ζ+[2Assa22Assa2χ2(1e2)1(2Asa2χ22As)]ζ3+[(1e2)12Assa2]ζ5.

  =

[2As(χ21)+2Asa2(1χ2)χ2]ζ+[2Assa2(1χ2)2Asa2(1e2)1χ2+2(1e2)1As]ζ3+[2Assa2(1e2)1]ζ5.

By comparison, the vertical derivative of our "test01" pressure expression gives,

Ptest01 =

χ0{Pc*Asζ2+12[Assa2+(1e2)1As]ζ413Assa2(1e2)1ζ6}+χ2{As(1e2)+12[Assa2+(1e2)1As]2(1e2)ζ2Assa2ζ4}

   

+χ4{12[Assa2+(1e2)1As](1e2)2Assa2(1e2)ζ2}+χ6{13Assa2(1e2)2}

Ptest01ζ =

χ0{2Asζ+2[Assa2+(1e2)1As]ζ32Assa2(1e2)1ζ5}+χ2{2[Assa2+(1e2)1As](1e2)ζ4Assa2ζ3}+χ4{2Assa2(1e2)ζ}

  =

ζ1{2As+2[Assa2+(1e2)1As](1e2)χ22Assa2(1e2)χ4}+ζ3{2[Assa2+(1e2)1As]4Assa2χ2}+ζ5{2Assa2(1e2)1}

  =

ζ1{2As(χ21)+2Assa2(1e2)χ2(1χ2)}+ζ3{2Assa2(12χ2)+2(1e2)1As}+ζ5{2Assa2(1e2)1}

Instead, try …

Ptest02Pc =

p2(ρρc)2+p3(ρρc)3

ζ[Ptest02Pc] =

2p2(ρρc)ζ[ρρc]+3p3(ρρc)2ζ[ρρc]

  =

(ρρc){2p2+3p3(ρρc)}ζ[ρρc]

  =

(ρρc){2p2+3p3[1χ2ζ2(1e2)1]}ζ[1χ2ζ2(1e2)1]

  =

(ρρc){(2p2+3p3)3p3χ23p3ζ2(1e2)1}[2ζ(1e2)1]

  =

(ρρc)(1e2)2{6p3χ2ζ(1e2)2(2p2+3p3)(1e2)ζ+6p3ζ3}

Compare the term inside the curly braces with the term, from the beginning of this subsection, inside the square brackets, namely,

2Asa2χ2ζ2Asζ+2Assa2ζ3 =

2e4[(3e2)Υ]χ2ζ[4e2(113Υ)]ζ+43e4[4e23(1e2)+Υ]ζ3

  =

13e4(1e2){6[(3e2)Υ](1e2)χ2ζ[12e2(113Υ)](1e2)ζ+4[(4e23)+Υ]ζ3}.

Pretty Close!!

Alternatively:   according to the third term, we need to set,

6p3 =

4[(4e23)+Υ]

Υ =

32p3+(34e2)

in which case, the first coefficient must be given by the expression,

[(3e2)Υ] =

(3e2)32p3+(4e23)]=[3e232p3].

And, from the second coefficient, we find,

2(2p2+3p3) =

[12e2(113Υ)]

2p2 =

2e2(3Υ)3p3

 

=

3p3+6e22e2[32p3+(34e2)]

 

=

3p3+6e2[3e2p3+6e28e4]

 

=

8e43p3(1+e2);

or,

p2

=

4e4(1+e2)[(4e23)+Υ]

 

=

4e4(1+e2)(4e23)(1+e2)Υ

 

=

4e4[4e23+4e43e2](1+e2)Υ

 

=

3e2(1+e2)Υ


SUMMARY:

Ptest02Pc =

p2(ρρc)2+p3(ρρc)3,

p2

=

3e2(1+e2)Υ=e4(Asa2)e2Υ,

p3 =

23[(4e23)+Υ]=e4(Assa2)+23e2Υ.


Note:   according to the first term, we need to set,

p3 =

[(3e2)Υ]

Υ =

[(3e2)p3],

in which case, the third coefficient must be given by the expression,

4[(4e23)+Υ] =

4[(4e23)+(3e2)p3]=4[3e2p3].

And, from the second coefficient, we find,

2(2p2+3p3) =

[12e2(113Υ)]

2p2 =

2e2(3Υ)3p3

 

=

2e2[3[(3e2)p3]]3p3

 

=

2e2[e2+p3]3p3

 

=

2e4+(2e23)p3;

or,

2p2

=

2e4+(2e23)[(3e2)Υ]

 

=

2e4+(2e23)(3e2)(2e23)Υ

 

=

2e4+(6e22e49+3e2)(2e23)Υ

 

=

9(e21)(2e23)Υ

Better yet, try …

Ptest03Pc =

p2(ρρc)2[1β(1ρρc)]=p2(ρρc)2[(1β)+β(ρρc)]

ζ[Ptest03Pc] =

where, in the case of a spherically symmetric parabolic-density configuration, β=1/2. Well … this wasn't a bad idea, but as it turns out, this "test03" expression is no different from the "test02" guess. Specifically, the "test03" expression can be rewritten as,

Ptest03Pc =

p2(1β)(ρρc)2+p2β(ρρc)3,

which has the same form as the "test02" expression.

Test04

From above, we understand that, analytically,

[1(πGρc2a2)]Pζ =

[1χ2ζ2(1e2)1][2Asa2χ2ζ2Asζ+2Assa2ζ3]

  =

[(2Asa2χ22As)(2Asa2χ42Asχ2)]ζ+[2Assa22Assa2χ2(1e2)1(2Asa2χ22As)]ζ3+[(1e2)12Assa2]ζ5

  =

[2As(χ21)+2Asa2(1χ2)χ2]ζ+[2Assa2(1χ2)2Asa2(1e2)1χ2+2(1e2)1As]ζ3+[2Assa2(1e2)1]ζ5.

Also from above, we have shown that if,

Ptest02Pc =

p2(ρρc)2+p3(ρρc)3

SUMMARY from test02:

p2

=

3e2(1+e2)Υ=e4(Asa2)e2Υ,

p3 =

23[(4e23)+Υ]=e4(Assa2)+23e2Υ.

ζ[Ptest02Pc] =

(ρρc)(1e2)2{6p3χ2ζ(1e2)2(2p2+3p3)(1e2)ζ+6p3ζ3}

  =

(ρρc)(1e2)2{6[e4(Assa2)+23e2Υ]χ2ζ(1e2)2[2e4(Asa2)+3e4(Assa2)](1e2)ζ+6[e4(Assa2)+23e2Υ]ζ3}




Here (test04), we add a term that is linear in the normalized density, which means,

Ptest04Pc =

Ptest02Pc+p1(ρρc)

ζ[Ptest04Pc] =

ζ[Ptest02Pc]+ζ[p1(ρρc)]=ζ[Ptest02Pc]+p1ζ[1χ2ζ2(1e2)1]

See Also

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |