SSC/Stability/n1PolytropeLAWE: Difference between revisions

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Line 153: Line 153:
<br />
<br />


This is identical to the formulation of the wave equation that is relevant to  the (n = 1) core of the composite polytrope studied by [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985PASAu...6..222M J. O. Murphy &amp; R. Fiedler (1985b)]; for comparison, their expression is displayed, here, in the following boxed-in image.
This is identical to the formulation of the wave equation that is relevant to  the (n = 1) core of the composite polytrope studied by [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985PASAu...6..222M J. O. Murphy &amp; R. Fiedler (1985b)]; for comparison, their expression is displayed, in the following boxed-in image.


<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<table border="2" cellpadding="10" id="MurphyFiedler1985b">
<table border="2" cellpadding="10" id="MurphyFiedler1985b">
<tr>
<tr>
   <th align="center">
   <td align="center">
n = 1 Polytropic Formulation of Wave Equation as Presented by [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985PASAu...6..222M Murphy &amp; Fiedler (1985b)]
n = 1 Polytropic Formulation of the LAWE as Presented by &hellip;
   </th>
 
{{ MF85bfigure }}
<!--[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985PASAu...6..222M Murphy &amp; Fiedler (1985b)] -->
   </td>
<tr>
<tr>
   <td>
   <td>
[[File:MurphyFiedlerN1formulation.png|700px|center|Murphy &amp; Fiedler (1985b)]]
<!-- [[File:MurphyFiedlerN1formulation.png|700px|center|Murphy &amp; Fiedler (1985b)]] -->
<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="5">
<tr>
  <td align="center">
<math>
\frac{d^2\eta}{d\zeta^2}
+ \frac{1}{\zeta}\biggl[ 4 + \frac{2(\zeta \cos\zeta - \sin\zeta)}{\sin\zeta}\biggr]\frac{d\eta}{d\zeta}
+ \biggl[ \frac{\omega_k^2 \zeta}{\sin\zeta} + \frac{2\alpha^* (\zeta \cos\zeta - \sin\zeta)}{\zeta^2\sin\zeta} \biggr]\eta
= 0
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>

Revision as of 15:29, 21 January 2024

Radial Oscillations of n = 1 Polytropic Spheres (Pt 1)


Part I:   Search for Analytic Solutions
 

Part II:  New Ideas
 

III:  What About Bipolytropes?
 


As far as we have been able to ascertain, the first technical examination of radial oscillation modes in n=1 polytropes was performed — using numerical techniques — in 1951 by L. D. Chatterji; at the time, he was in the Mathematics Department of Allahabad University. His two papers on this topic were published in, what is now referred to as, the Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy (PINSA). The citations that immediately follow this opening paragraph provide inks to both of these papers by Chatterji, but the links may be insecure. (Citations/links to articles that provide analyses of models having other polytropic indexes are provided at the bottom of this chapter.) Apparently Springer is archiving recent PINSA volumes, but their holdings do not date back as early as 1951.

A detailed review of Chatterji51 is provided in an accompanying discussion.

Groundwork

In an accompanying discussion, we derived the so-called,

Adiabatic Wave (or Radial Pulsation) Equation

d2xdr02+[4r0(g0ρ0P0)]dxdr0+(ρ0γgP0)[ω2+(43γg)g0r0]x=0

whose solution gives eigenfunctions that describe various radial modes of oscillation in spherically symmetric, self-gravitating fluid configurations. Because this widely used form of the radial pulsation equation is not dimensionless but, rather, has units of inverse length-squared, we have found it useful to also recast it in the following dimensionless form:

d2xdχ02+[4χ0(ρ0ρc)(P0Pc)1(g0gSSC)]dxdχ0+(ρ0ρc)(P0Pc)1(1γg)[τSSC2ω2+(43γg)(g0gSSC)1χ0]x=0,

where,

gSSCPcRρc,       and       τSSC[R2ρcPc]1/2.

In a separate discussion, we showed that specifically for isolated, polytropic configurations, this linear adiabatic wave equation (LAWE) can be rewritten as,

0

=

d2xdξ2+[4(n+1)V(ξ)ξ]dxdξ+[ω2γgθ(n+14πGρc)(34γg)(n+1)V(x)ξ2]x

 

=

d2xdξ2+[4ξ(n+1)θ(dθdξ)]dxdξ+(n+1)θ[σc26γgαξ(dθdξ)]x,

where we have adopted the dimensionless frequency notation,

σc2

3ω22πGρc.

Here we focus on an analysis of the specific case of isolated, n=1 polytropic configurations, whose unperturbed equilibrium structure can be prescribed in terms of analytic functions. Our hope — as yet unfulfilled — is that we can discover an analytically prescribed eigenvector solution to the governing LAWE.

Search for Analytic Solutions to the LAWE

Setup

From our derived structure of an n = 1 polytrope, in terms of the configuration's radius R and mass M, the central pressure and density are, respectively,

Pc=πG8(M2R4) ,

and

ρc=πM4R3 .

Hence the characteristic time and acceleration are, respectively,

τSSC=[R2ρcPc]1/2=[2R3GM]1/2=[π2Gρc]1/2,

and,

gSSC=PcRρc=(GM2R2).

The required functions are,

  • Density:

ρ0(χ0)ρc=sin(πχ0)πχ0 ;

  • Pressure:

P0(χ0)Pc=[sin(πχ0)πχ0]2 ;

  • Gravitational acceleration:

g0(r0)gSSC=2χ02[Mr(χ0)M]=2πχ02[sin(πχ0)πχ0cos(πχ0)].

So our desired Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors will be solutions to the following ODE:

d2xdχ02+2χ0[1+πχ0cot(πχ0)]dxdχ0+1γg{πχ0sin(πχ0)[πω22Gρc]+2χ02(43γg)[1πχ0cot(πχ0)]}x=0,


or, replacing χ0 with ξπχ0 and dividing the entire expression by π2, we have,

d2xdξ2+2ξ[1+ξcotξ]dxdξ+1γg{ξsinξ[ω22πGρc]+2ξ2(43γg)[1ξcotξ]}x=0.


This is identical to the formulation of the wave equation that is relevant to the (n = 1) core of the composite polytrope studied by J. O. Murphy & R. Fiedler (1985b); for comparison, their expression is displayed, in the following boxed-in image.

n = 1 Polytropic Formulation of the LAWE as Presented by …

J. O. Murphy & R. Fiedler (1985)
Radial Pulsations and Vibrational Stability of a Sequence of Two Zone Polytropic Stellar Models
Proceedings of the Astronomical Society of Australia, Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 222 - 226

d2ηdζ2+1ζ[4+2(ζcosζsinζ)sinζ]dηdζ+[ωk2ζsinζ+2α*(ζcosζsinζ)ζ2sinζ]η=0


Material that appears after this point in our presentation is under development and therefore
may contain incorrect mathematical equations and/or physical misinterpretations.
|   Go Home   |


 

From an accompanying discussion, we find the,

Polytropic LAWE (linear adiabatic wave equation)

0=d2xdξ2+[4(n+1)Q]1ξdxdξ+(n+1)[(σc26γg)ξ2θαQ]xξ2

where:    Q(ξ)dlnθdlnξ,    σc23ω22πGρc,     and,     α(34γg)

For an isolated n = 1 (γg=2,α=1) polytrope, we know that,

θ

=

sinξξ

    Q(ξ)dlnθdlnξ

=

[1ξcotξ].

Hence, the relevant LAWE is,

0

=

d2xdξ2+[42(1ξcotξ)]1ξdxdξ+2[(σc212)ξ3sinξ(1ξcotξ)]xξ2

LAWE for n = 1 Polytrope

0

=

d2xdξ2+2ξ[1+ξcotξ]dxdξ+12[(σc23)ξsinξ4ξ2(1ξcotξ)]x

This matches precisely the expression derived immediately above.

Surface boundary condition:

dlnxdlnξ|surf

=

(3nn+1)+nσc26(n+1)[ξθ]surf

dlnxdlnξ|surf

=

1+σc212[ξ3(ξcosξsinξ)]ξ=π=1π2σc212

Attempt at Deriving an Analytic Eigenvector Solution

Multiplying the last expression through by ξ2sinξ gives,

(ξ2sinξ)d2xdξ2+2[ξsinξ+ξ2cosξ]dxdξ+[σ2ξ32α(sinξξcosξ)]x=0,


where,

σ2

ω22πGρcγg,

α

34γg.

The first two terms can be folded together to give,

1ξ2sin2ξddξ[ξ2sin2ξdxdξ]

=

1ξ2sinξ[2α(sinξξcosξ)σ2ξ3]x

 

=

[2αξ2(ξcosξsinξ1)+σ2(ξsinξ)]x

 

=

[2αξ2ξ2sinξddξ(sinξξ)+σ2(ξsinξ)]x

 

=

[2αξddξ(sinξξ)+σ2](ξsinξ)x,

where, in order to make this next-to-last step, we have recognized that,

ddξ(sinξξ)

=

sinξξ2[ξcosξsinξ1].

It would seem that the eigenfunction, x(ξ), should be expressible in terms of trigonometric functions and powers of ξ; indeed, it appears as though the expression governing this eigenfunction would simplify considerably if xsinξ/ξ. With this in mind, we have made some attempts to guess the exact form of the eigenfunction. Here is one such attempt.

First Guess (n1)

Let's try,

x=sinξξ,

which means,

x'dxdξ

=

sinξξ2[ξcosξsinξ1].

Does this satisfy the governing expression? Let's see. The right-and-side (RHS) gives:

RHS

=

[2αξddξ(sinξξ)+σ2](ξsinξ)x=[2αx'ξ+σ2].

At the same time, the left-hand-side (LHS) may, quite generically, be written as:

LHS

=

x'ξ{ξ(ξ2sin2ξ)x'd[(ξ2sin2ξ)x']dξ}

 

=

x'ξ[dln[(ξ2sin2ξ)x']dlnξ].

Putting the two sides together therefore gives,

x'ξ[dln[(ξ2sin2ξ)x']dlnξ+2α]

=

σ2

[dln[(ξ2sin2ξ)x']1/(2α)dlnξ+1]

=

σ22α(ξx')

dln[(ξ2sin2ξ)x']1/(2α)dlnξ

=

1+σ22α(ξx').

[Comment from J. E. Tohline on 6 April 2015: I'm not sure what else to make of this.]

Second Guess (n1)

Adopting the generic rewriting of the LHS, and leaving the RHS fully generic as well, we have,

x'ξ[dln[(ξ2sin2ξ)x']dlnξ]

=

[2αξddξ(sinξξ)+σ2](ξsinξ)x

x'x[dln[(ξ2sin2ξ)x']dlnξ]

=

2α(ξsinξ)ddξ(sinξξ)σ2(ξ2sinξ)

dln(x)dlnξ[dln[(ξ2sin2ξ)x']dlnξ]

=

2α[dln(sinξ/ξ)dlnξ]σ2(ξ3sinξ).

σ2

=

(sinξξ3){dln(x)dlnξ[dln[(ξ2sin2ξ)x']dlnξ]+2α[dln(sinξ/ξ)dlnξ]}.

[Comment from J. E. Tohline on 6 April 2015: I'm not sure what else to make of this.]


Third Guess (n1)

Let's rewrite the polytropic (n = 1) wave equation as follows:

sinξ[ξ2x'+2ξx'2αx]+cosξ[2ξ2x'+2αξx]+σ2ξ3x=0.

It is difficult to determine what term in the adiabatic wave equation will cancel the term involving σ2 because its leading coefficient is ξ3 and no other term contains a power of ξ that is higher than two. After thinking through various trial eigenvector expressions, x(ξ), I have determined that a function of the following form has a chance of working because the second derivative of the function generates a leading factor of ξ3 while the function itself does not introduce any additional factors of ξ into the term that contains σ2:

x

=

[asin2(ξ5/2)+bsin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+ccos2(ξ5/2)][Asinξ+Bcosξ]

x'

=

[asin2(ξ5/2)+bsin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+ccos2(ξ5/2)]d[Asinξ+Bcosξ]dξ

 

 

+d[asin2(ξ5/2)+bsin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+ccos2(ξ5/2)]dξ[Asinξ+Bcosξ]

 

=

[asin2(ξ5/2)+bsin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+ccos2(ξ5/2)]d[Asinξ+Bcosξ]dξ

 

 

+[Asinξ+Bcosξ]{5aξ3/2sin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+b[52ξ3/2cos2(ξ5/2)52ξ3/2sin2(ξ5/2)]5cξ3/2sin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)}

 

=

[asin2(ξ5/2)+bsin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+ccos2(ξ5/2)]d[Asinξ+Bcosξ]dξ

 

 

+[Asinξ+Bcosξ]{5(ac)ξ3/2sin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+5b2ξ3/2[12sin2(ξ5/2)]}

x'

=

[asin2(ξ5/2)+bsin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+ccos2(ξ5/2)]d2[Asinξ+Bcosξ]d2ξ

 

 

+{5(ac)ξ3/2sin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+5b2ξ3/2[12sin2(ξ5/2)]}d[Asinξ+Bcosξ]dξ

 

 

+[Asinξ+Bcosξ]{152(ac)ξ1/2sin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+252(ac)ξ3cos2(ξ5/2)252(ac)ξ3sin2(ξ5/2)

 

 

+15b4ξ1/2[12sin2(ξ5/2)]25bξ3sin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)}

 

=

[asin2(ξ5/2)+bsin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+ccos2(ξ5/2)]d2[Asinξ+Bcosξ]d2ξ

 

 

+{5(ac)ξ3/2sin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+5b2ξ3/2[12sin2(ξ5/2)]}d[Asinξ+Bcosξ]dξ

 

 

+[Asinξ+Bcosξ]{154ξ1/2[2(ac)sin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+b(12sin2(ξ5/2))]

 

 

+252ξ3[2bsin(ξ5/2)cos(ξ5/2)+(ac)(12sin2(ξ5/2))]}

[Comment from J. E. Tohline on 9 April 2015: I'm not sure what else to make of this.]

[Additional comment from J. E. Tohline on 15 April 2015: It is perhaps worth mentioning that there is a similarity between the argument of the trigonometric function being used in this "third guess" and the Lane-Emden function derived by Srivastava for n=5 polytropes; and also a similarity between Srivastava's function and the functional form of the LHS that we constructed, above, in connection with our "second guess."]

Fourth Guess (n1)

Again, working with the polytropic (n = 1) wave equation written in the following form,

sinξ[ξ2x'+2ξx'2αx]+cosξ[2ξ2x'+2αξx]+σ2ξ3x=0.

Now, let's try:

x=a0+b1ξsinξ+c2ξ2cosξ,

which means,

x'

=

b1sinξ+b1ξcosξ+2c2ξcosξc2ξ2sinξ

 

=

(b1c2ξ2)sinξ+(b1+2c2)ξcosξ,

x'

=

(2c2ξ)sinξ+(b1c2ξ2)cosξ+(b1+2c2)cosξ(b1+2c2)ξsinξ

 

=

(2c2+b1+2c2)ξsinξ+(2b1+2c2c2ξ2)cosξ.

The LHS of the wave equation then becomes,

LHS

=

sinξ{ξ2[(2c2+b1+2c2)ξsinξ+(2b1+2c2c2ξ2)cosξ]+2ξ[(b1c2ξ2)sinξ+(b1+2c2)ξcosξ]2α[a0+(b1ξ)sinξ+(c2ξ2)cosξ]}

 

 

+cosξ{2ξ2[(b1c2ξ2)sinξ+(b1+2c2)ξcosξ]+2αξ[a0+(b1ξ)sinξ+(c2ξ2)cosξ]}+σ2ξ3[a0+b1ξsinξ+c2ξ2cosξ]

 

=

sinξ{[(2c2+b1+2c2)ξ3sinξ+(2b1+2c2c2ξ2)ξ2cosξ]+[2(b1c2ξ2)ξsinξ+2(b1+2c2)ξ2cosξ]2α[a0+(b1ξ)sinξ+(c2ξ2)cosξ]}

 

 

+cosξ{[2(b1c2ξ2)ξ2sinξ+2(b1+2c2)ξ3cosξ]+[2a0αξ+2b1αξ2sinξ+2c2αξ3cosξ]}+σ2[a0ξ3+b1ξ4sinξ+c2ξ5cosξ]

 

=

sinξ{2αa0+[(2c2+b1+2c2)ξ3+2(b1c2ξ2)ξ2α(b1ξ)]sinξ+[(2b1+2c2c2ξ2)ξ2+2(b1+2c2)ξ22α(c2ξ2)]cosξ}

 

 

+cosξ{+2a0αξ+[2(b1c2ξ2)ξ2+2b1αξ2]sinξ+[2(b1+2c2)ξ3+2c2αξ3]cosξ}+σ2[a0ξ3+b1ξ4sinξ+c2ξ5cosξ]

 

=

σ2a0ξ3+[(2c2+b1+2c2)ξ3+2(b1c2ξ2)ξ2α(b1ξ)]sin2ξ+[2(b1+2c2)ξ3+2c2αξ3](1sin2ξ)

 

 

+[(2b1+2c2c2ξ2)ξ2+2(b1+2c2)ξ22α(c2ξ2)]sinξcosξ+[2(b1c2ξ2)ξ2+2b1αξ2]sinξcosξ

 

 

+σ2[b1ξ4sinξ+c2ξ5cosξ]+2a0αξcosξ2αa0sinξ

 

=

[σ2a0+2(b1+2c2)+2c2α]ξ3+{+2(b1)ξ2α(b1ξ)+[2c22(b1+2c2)2c2α(2c2+b1+2c2)]ξ3}sin2ξ

 

 

+{[(2b1+2c2)+2(b1+2c2)2α(c2)+2(b1)+2b1α]ξ23c2ξ4}sinξcosξ

 

 

+sinξ[σ2b1ξ42αa0]+ξcosξ[σ2c2ξ4+2a0α]

 

=

[σ2a0+2(b1+2c2)+2c2α]ξ3+{2b1(1α)[2c2(5+α)+3b1]ξ2}ξsin2ξ

 

 

+{2(3α)(b1+c2)3c2ξ2}ξ2sinξcosξ+sinξ[σ2b1ξ42αa0]+ξcosξ[σ2c2ξ4+2a0α].

Fifth Guess (n1)

Along a similar line of reasoning, let's try a function of the form,

x

=

xssinξ+xccosξ+x1sin2ξ+x2cos2ξ+x3sinξcosξ,

where xs,xc,x1,x2, and x3 are five separate, as yet, unspecified (polynomial?) functions of ξ. This also means that,

x'

=

(xs'xc)sinξ+(xc'+xs)cosξ+(x1'x3)sin2ξ+(x2'+x3)cos2ξ+(x3'+2x12x2)sinξcosξ;

and,

x'

=

(xs'2xc'xs)sinξ+(xc'+2xs'xc)cosξ+(x1'2x3'2x1+2x2)sin2ξ+(x2'+2x3'+2x12x2)cos2ξ+(x3'+4x1'4x2'4x3)sinξcosξ.

Hence the LHS of the polytropic (n = 1) wave equation becomes,

LHS

=

sinξ{ξ2[(xs'2xc'xs)sinξ+(xc'+2xs'xc)cosξ+(x1'2x3'2x1+2x2)sin2ξ+(x2'+2x3'+2x12x2)cos2ξ+(x3'+4x1'4x2'4x3)sinξcosξ]

 

 

+2ξ[(xs'xc)sinξ+(xc'+xs)cosξ+(x1'x3)sin2ξ+(x2'+x3)cos2ξ+(x3'+2x12x2)sinξcosξ]

 

 

2α[xssinξ+xccosξ+x1sin2ξ+x2cos2ξ+x3sinξcosξ]}

 

 

+cosξ{2ξ2[(xs'xc)sinξ+(xc'+xs)cosξ+(x1'x3)sin2ξ+(x2'+x3)cos2ξ+(x3'+2x12x2)sinξcosξ]

 

 

+2αξ[xssinξ+xccosξ+x1sin2ξ+x2cos2ξ+x3sinξcosξ]}

 

 

+σ2ξ3{xssinξ+xccosξ+x1sin2ξ+x2cos2ξ+x3sinξcosξ}

 

=

[(xs'2xc'xs)ξ2+2ξ(xs'xc)2αxs+σ2ξ3x1]sin2ξ+[(xc'+2xs'xc)ξ2+2ξ(xc'+xs)2αxc+2ξ2(xs'xc)+2αξxs+σ2ξ3x3]sinξcosξ

 

 

+[(x1'2x3'2x1+2x2)ξ2+2ξ(x1'x3)2αx1]sin3ξ+[(x2'+2x3'+2x12x2)ξ2+2ξ(x2'+x3)2αx2+2ξ2(x3'+2x12x2)+2αξx3]sinξcos2ξ

 

 

+[(x3'+4x1'4x2'4x3)ξ2+2ξ(x3'+2x12x2)2αx3+2ξ2(x1'x3)+2αξx1]sin2ξcosξ

 

 

+[2ξ2(xc'+xs)+2αξxc+σ2ξ3x2]cos2ξ+[2ξ2(x2'+x3)+2αξx2]cos3ξ+σ2ξ3xssinξ+σ2ξ3xccosξ

 

=

[(xs'2xc'xs)ξ2+2ξ(xs'xc)2αxs+σ2ξ3x1]sin2ξ+[(xc'+2xs'xc)ξ2+2ξ(xc'+xs)2αxc+2ξ2(xs'xc)+2αξxs+σ2ξ3x3]sinξcosξ

 

 

+[(x1'2x3'2x1+2x2)ξ2+2ξ(x1'x3)2αx1+σ2ξ3xs]sinξ

 

 

+[(x2'+2x3'+2x12x2)ξ2+2ξ(x2'+x3)2αx2+2ξ2(x3'+2x12x2)+2αξx3(x1'2x3'2x1+2x2)ξ22ξ(x1'x3)+2αx1]sinξcos2ξ

 

 

+[(x3'+4x1'4x2'4x3)ξ2+2ξ(x3'+2x12x2)2αx3+2ξ2(x1'x3)+2αξx12ξ2(x2'+x3)2αξx2]sin2ξcosξ

 

 

+[2ξ2(xc'+xs)+2αξxc+σ2ξ3x2]cos2ξ+[2ξ2(x2'+x3)+2αξx2+σ2ξ3xc]cosξ

So, the five chosen (polynomial?) functions of ξ must simultabeously satisfy the following, seven 2nd-order ODEs:

sinξ

      :      

(x1'2x3'2x1+2x2)ξ2+2ξ(x1'x3)2αx1+σ2ξ3xs=0

sin2ξ

      :      

(xs'2xc'xs)ξ2+2ξ(xs'xc)2αxs+σ2ξ3x1=0

sin2ξcosξ

      :      

(x3'+4x1'4x2'4x3)ξ2+2ξ(x3'+2x12x2)2αx3+2ξ2(x1'x3)+2αξx12ξ2(x2'+x3)2αξx2=0

sinξcosξ

      :      

(xc'+2xs'xc)ξ2+2ξ(xc'+xs)2αxc+2ξ2(xs'xc)+2αξxs+σ2ξ3x3=0

sinξcos2ξ

      :      

(x2'+2x3'+2x12x2)ξ2+2ξ(x2'+x3)2αx2+2ξ2(x3'+2x12x2)+2αξx3(x1'2x3'2x1+2x2)ξ22ξ(x1'x3)+2αx1=0

cos2ξ

      :      

2ξ2(xc'+xs)+2αξxc+σ2ξ3x2=0

cosξ

      :      

2ξ2(x2'+x3)+2αξx2+σ2ξ3xc=0

Example 1

Let's work on the coefficient of the cosξ term:

xc

=

ξβ(Ac)

x2

=

ξβ(C2ξ2)

x3

=

ξβ(B3ξ)

      Coefficient of "cosξ" term

=

ξβ[2ξ2(2C2ξ+(B3ξ))+2αξ(C2ξ2)+σ2ξ3(Ac)]

 

=

ξβ+3[2(2C2+B3)+2αC2+σ2(Ac)]

σ2

=

2Ac[B3+(2+α)C2]

Sixth Guess (n1)

Rationale

From our review of the properties of n=1 polytropic spheres, we know that the equilibrium density distribution is given by the sinc function, namely,

ρρc

=

sinξξ,

where,

ξπ(r0R0).

The total mass is,

Mtot=4πρcR03,

and the fractional mass enclosed within a given radius, r, is,

Mr(ξ)Mtot

=

1π[sinξξcosξ].

Let's guess that, during the fundamental mode of radial oscillation, the sinc-function profile is preserved as the system's total radius varies. In particular, we will assume that the system's time-varying radius is,

R=R0(1+δRR0)=R0(1+ϵR),

and seek to determine how the displacement vector, ϵδr/r0, varies with r0 in order to preserve the overall sinc-function profile. As is usual, we will only examine small perturbations away from equilibrium, that is, we will assume that everywhere throughout the configuration, |ϵ|1.


Let's begin by defining a new dimensionless coordinate,

ηπ(rR)=π[r0(1+ϵ)R0(1+ϵR)]ξ(1+ϵ),

and recognize that, in the new perturbed state, the fractional mass enclosed within a given radius, r, is,

Mr(η)Mtot

=

1π[sinηηcosη].

In order to associate each mass shell in the perturbed configuration with its corresponding mass shell in the unperturbed, equilibrium state, we need to set the two Mr functions equal to one another, that is, demand that,

sinξξcosξ

=

sinηηcosη

 

sin[ξ(1+ϵ)]ξ(1+ϵ)cos[ξ(1+ϵ)]

 

=

[sinξcos(ξϵ)+cosξsin(ξϵ)]ξ(1+ϵ)[cosξcos(ξϵ)sinξsin(ξϵ)]

 

sinξ[112(ξϵ)2]+(ξϵ)cosξξ(1+ϵ)cosξ[112(ξϵ)2]+ξ2ϵ(1+ϵ)sinξ

 

sinξξcosξ12(ξϵ)2sinξ+(ξϵ)cosξ(ξϵ)cosξ+12ξ3ϵ2cosξ+ξ2ϵsinξ+(ξϵ)2sinξ

ξ2ϵsinξ

(ξϵ)22[ξcosξ+sinξ]

1ϵ

12[ξcosξsinξ+1]

ϵ

2[1+ξcosξsinξ]1=2sinξ[sinξ+ξcosξ]1.

Resulting Polytropic Wave Equation

So, let's try,

x

=

2sinξ[sinξ+ξcosξ]1

 

=

[sinξ+ξcosξ]32sinξ[sin2ξ+2ξsinξcosξ+ξ2cos2ξ],

in which case,

x'

=

2cosξ[sinξ+ξcosξ]12sinξ[sinξ+ξcosξ]2[2cosξξsinξ]

 

=

[sinξ+ξcosξ]2{2cosξ[sinξ+ξcosξ]2sinξ[2cosξξsinξ]}

 

=

[sinξ+ξcosξ]2[2cosξsinξ+2ξcos2ξ4sinξcosξ+2ξsin2ξ]

 

=

2[sinξ+ξcosξ]2[ξsinξcosξ]

 

=

[sinξ+ξcosξ]32[ξsinξ+ξ2cosξsin2ξcosξξsinξcos2ξ],

and,

x'

=

2[sinξ+ξcosξ]2[1cos2ξ+sin2ξ]4[sinξ+ξcosξ]3[ξsinξcosξ][2cosξξsinξ]

 

=

4[sinξ+ξcosξ]3{sin2ξ[sinξ+ξcosξ][ξsinξcosξ][2cosξξsinξ]}

 

=

4[sinξ+ξcosξ]3[sin3ξ+ξsinξcosξ+ξ2sinξ2ξcosξξsin2ξcosξ+2sinξcos2ξ]

Graphical Reassessment

Before plowing ahead and plugging these expressions into the polytropic wave equation, I plotted the trial eigenfunction,

ϵ(ξ/π)

(see the blue curve in the accompanying "Trial Eigenfunction" figure), and noticed that it passes through

±

midway through the configuration. This is a very unphysical behavior. On the other hand, the inverse of this function (see the red curve) exhibits a relatively desirable behavior because it increases monotonically from negative one at the center. As plotted, however, the function has one node. In searching for the eigenfunction of the fundamental mode of oscillation, it might be better to add "1" to the inverse of the function and thereby get rid of all nodes. (Keep in mind, however, that the red curve might be displaying the eigenfunction associated with the first overtone.)

Let's therefore try,

x=1+1ϵ=112[ξcosξsinξ+1]=12[1ξcosξsinξ].

In this case we have,

x'

=

12[ξcosξsinξ+ξcos2ξsin2ξ]

 

=

12sin2ξ[ξsin2ξsinξcosξ+ξcos2ξ],

 

=

12sin2ξ[ξsinξcosξ],

and,

x'

=

cosξsin3ξ[ξsinξcosξ]+12sin2ξ[1cos2ξ+sin2ξ]

 

=

1cosξsin3ξ[ξsinξcosξ].

Now let's plug these expressions into the polytropic (n = 1) wave equation, namely,

σ2ξ3x

=

sinξ[ξ2x'+2ξx'2αx]+cosξ[2ξ2x'+2αξx].

The first term inside the square brackets on the right-hand-side gives,

ξ2x'+2ξx'2αx

=

ξ2cosξsin3ξ(ξ3ξ2sinξcosξ)+1sin2ξ(ξ2ξsinξcosξ)α(1ξcosξsinξ)

 

=

1sin3ξ[ξ2sin3ξcosξ(ξ3ξ2sinξcosξ)+sinξ(ξ2ξsinξcosξ)α(sin3ξξcosξsin2ξ)]

 

=

1sin3ξ[ξ2sinξ(1cos2ξ)+ξ2sinξcos2ξξ3cosξ+ξ2sinξξsin2ξcosξαsin3ξ+αξcosξsin2ξ]

 

=

α+1sin3ξ[2ξ2sinξξ3cosξξsin2ξcosξ+αξcosξsin2ξ];

and the second term inside the square brackets on the right-hand-side gives,

2ξ2x'+2αξx

=

1sin2ξ(ξ3ξ2sinξcosξ)+αsinξ(ξsinξξ2cosξ).

Put together, then, we have,

RHS

=

1sin2ξ[2ξ2sinξξ3cosξξsin2ξcosξ+αξcosξsin2ξ]+cosξsin2ξ(ξ3ξ2sinξcosξ)αsinξ+αcosξsinξ(ξsinξξ2cosξ)

 

=

1sin2ξ[2ξ2sinξξ3cosξξsin2ξcosξ+αξcosξsin2ξ+ξ3cosξξ2sinξcos2ξ]+αsinξ[sin2ξ+ξsinξcosξξ2cos2ξ]

 

=

ξsinξ[2ξsinξcosξξcos2ξ]αsinξ[sin2ξ+ξ2cos2ξ]

 

=

ξ2sinξ[1+sin2ξ(sinξξ)cosξα(sin2ξξ2+cos2ξ)],

and,

LHS

=

ξσ22(ξ2sinξ)[sinξξcosξ].

If our trial eigenfunction is a proper solution to the polytropic wave equation, then the difference of these two expressions should be zero. Let's see:

sinξξ2(RHSLHS)

=

1+sin2ξ(sinξξ)cosξα(sin2ξξ2+cos2ξ)+ξσ22[sinξξcosξ].

This expression clearly is not zero, so our trial eigenfunction is not a good one. However, the terms in the wave equation did combine somewhat to give a fairly compact — albeit nonzero — expression. So we may be on the right track!


See Also

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |