Editing
SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/51RenormaizePart2
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Additional Relations=== ====Core==== The analytically prescribed radial pressure gradient in the core can be obtained as follows. <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\frac{d\tilde{M}_r}{d\xi}</math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{-1} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{2} \biggl( \frac{2\cdot 3}{\pi } \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl\{ 3\xi^2 \biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2 \biggr)^{-3/2} - \xi^4 \biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2 \biggr)^{-5/2} \biggr\} </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{-1} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{2} \biggl( \frac{2\cdot 3}{\pi } \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl\{ 3\xi^2 \biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2 \biggr) - \xi^4 \biggr\}\biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2 \biggr)^{-5/2} </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{-1} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{2} \biggl( \frac{2\cdot 3}{\pi } \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl\{ 3\xi^2 \biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2 \biggr)^{-5/2} \biggr\} </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{d\xi}{d\tilde{M}_r}</math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-2} \biggl( \frac{\pi }{2\cdot 3} \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl\{ \frac{1}{3\xi^2 }\biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2 \biggr)^{5/2} \biggr\} \, . </math> </td> </tr> </table> Also, <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\frac{d\tilde{P}}{d\xi}</math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> - \mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^6 \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-12} \biggl\{ 2\xi\biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2 \biggr)^{-4} \biggr\} </math> </td> </tr> </table> Hence, <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\frac{d\tilde{P}}{d\tilde{M}_r}</math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> - \mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^6 \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-12} \biggl\{ 2\xi\biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2 \biggr)^{-4} \biggr\} \cdot \mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-2} \biggl( \frac{\pi }{2\cdot 3} \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl\{ \frac{1}{3\xi^2 }\biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2 \biggr)^{5/2} \biggr\} </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> - \mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^7 \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-14} \biggl( \frac{2\pi }{3^3} \biggr)^{1/2} \frac{1}{\xi}\biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2 \biggr)^{-3/2} \, . </math> </td> </tr> </table> For comparison, in [[SSCpt2/SolutionStrategies#Solution_Strategies|hydrostatic balance]] we expect … <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>\frac{dP}{dM_r} = \frac{dP}{dr} \cdot \frac{dr}{dM_r} </math> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> - \frac{GM_r \rho}{r^2} \cdot \frac{1}{4\pi r^2\rho} = - \frac{GM_r }{4\pi r^4} </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> <math> \Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{d\tilde{P}}{d\tilde{M}_r} = \biggl[ \frac{dP}{dM_r}\biggr] \cdot \biggl[ K_c^{-10} G^9 M_\mathrm{tot}^6 \biggr]M_\mathrm{tot} </math> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> - \frac{G M_r }{4\pi r^4} \biggl[ K_c^{-10} G^9 M_\mathrm{tot}^7 \biggr] </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> - \frac{\tilde{M}_r }{4\pi r^4} \biggl[ K_c^{-10} G^{10} M_\mathrm{tot}^8 \biggr] </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> - \frac{\tilde{M}_r }{4\pi \tilde{r}^4} </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> - \frac{1}{4\pi} \mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{-1} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{2} \biggl( \frac{2\cdot 3}{\pi } \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl[ \xi^3 \biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2 \biggr)^{-3/2} \biggr] \cdot \biggl\{ \mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{-2} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{4} \biggl(\frac{3}{2\pi}\biggr)^{1/2} \xi \biggr\}^{-4} </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> - \biggl\{ \mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{7} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-14} \biggl(\frac{2^2\pi^2}{3^2}\biggr) \biggr\} \frac{1}{4\pi} \biggl( \frac{2\cdot 3}{\pi } \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl[ \frac{1}{\xi} \biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2 \biggr)^{-3/2} \biggr] </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> - \biggl\{ \mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{7} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-14} \biggr\} \biggl( \frac{2\cdot \pi}{ 3^3 } \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl[ \frac{1}{\xi} \biggl( 1 + \frac{1}{3}\xi^2 \biggr)^{-3/2} \biggr] \, . </math> </td> </tr> </table> <span id="Takeaway">This matches our earlier expression, as it should. </span> <table border="1" align="center" cellpadding="8" width="60%"><tr><td align="left"> <div align="center">'''Takeaway Expression'''</div> <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math> \frac{d\tilde{P}}{d\tilde{M}_r} </math> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> - \frac{\tilde{M}_r }{4\pi \tilde{r}^4} </math> </td> </tr> </table> </td></tr></table> ====Envelope==== Given that, for the envelope, <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math> \tilde{M}_r </math> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math>\mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{-1}~ \theta^{-1}_i \biggl( \frac{2}{\pi} \biggr)^{1/2} A\biggl[ \sin(\eta-B) - \eta\cos(\eta-B) \biggr] \, ,</math> and, </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> <math> \tilde{r} </math> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math>\mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{-2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{3} \theta^{-2}_i (2\pi)^{-1/2}\eta \, ,</math> </td> </tr> </table> we deduce that, <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math> \frac{d\tilde{P}}{d\tilde{M}_r} = - \frac{\tilde{M}_r}{4\pi \tilde{r}^4} </math> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \biggl(\frac{1}{4\pi}\biggr) \mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{-1}~ \theta^{-1}_i \biggl( \frac{2}{\pi} \biggr)^{1/2} A\biggl[ \eta\cos(\eta-B) -\sin(\eta-B) \biggr] \cdot \biggl[ \mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{-2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{3} \theta^{-2}_i (2\pi)^{-1/2}\eta \biggr]^{-4} </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \biggl(\frac{1}{2^4\pi^2} \cdot \frac{2}{\pi} \cdot 2^4 \pi^4\biggr)^{1 / 2} \mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{7}~ \theta^{7}_i A\biggl[ \eta\cos(\eta-B) -\sin(\eta-B) \biggr] \cdot \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-12} \eta^{-4} \biggr] </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \biggl( 2\pi\biggr)^{1 / 2} \mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{7}~ \theta^{7}_i \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-12} \cdot \frac{A}{\eta^4}\biggl[ \eta\cos(\eta-B) -\sin(\eta-B) \biggr] \cdot </math> </td> </tr> </table> As a cross-check … <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math> \frac{d\tilde{P}}{d\eta} </math> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math>\mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^6 \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-12} \theta^{6}_i \biggl[2\phi \cdot \frac{d\phi}{d\eta} \biggr]</math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math>2\mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^6 \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-12} \theta^{6}_i \cdot \frac{A^2}{\eta^3} \cdot \biggl[ \eta\cos(\eta-B) - \sin(\eta-B) \biggr] \sin(\eta - B) \, ,</math> </td> </tr> </table> and, <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math> \frac{d\tilde{M}_r}{d\eta} </math> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> A \mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{-1}~ \theta^{-1}_i \biggl( \frac{2}{\pi} \biggr)^{1/2} \frac{d}{d\eta}\biggl[ \sin(\eta-B) - \eta\cos(\eta-B) \biggr] </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> A \mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{-1}~ \theta^{-1}_i \biggl( \frac{2}{\pi} \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl\{ \eta\sin(\eta-B) \biggr\} \, . </math> </td> </tr> </table> That is, <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math> \frac{d\tilde{P}}{d\tilde{M}_r} </math> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math>2\mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^6 \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-12} \theta^{6}_i \cdot \frac{A^2}{\eta^3} \cdot \biggl[ \eta\cos(\eta-B) - \sin(\eta-B) \biggr] \sin(\eta - B) \biggl\{ A \mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^{-1}~ \theta^{-1}_i \biggl( \frac{2}{\pi} \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl[ \eta\sin(\eta-B) \biggr] \biggr\}^{-1} </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math>(2\pi)^{1/2} \mathcal{m}_\mathrm{surf}^7 \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-12} \theta^{7}_i \cdot \frac{A}{\eta^4} \cdot \biggl[ \eta\cos(\eta-B) - \sin(\eta-B) \biggr] \, . </math> </td> </tr> </table> <font color="red">Correct!</font> ====Time-Dependent Euler Equation==== We begin with the form of the, <div align="center"> <span id="PGE:Euler"><font color="#770000">'''Euler Equation'''</font></span><br /> <math>\frac{dv_r}{dt} = - \frac{1}{\rho}\frac{dP}{dr} - \frac{d\Phi}{dr} </math><br /> </div> that is broadly relevant to studies of radial oscillations in [[SSCpt1/PGE#PGE_for_Spherically_Symmetric_Configurations|spherically symmetric configurations]]. Recognizing from, for example, a [[SSC/Dynamics/FreeFall#Assembling_the_Key_Relations|related discussion]] that, <math>v_r = dr/dt</math>, and that, <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="5"> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\frac{d\Phi}{dr}</math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"><math>\frac{GM_r}{r^2}</math></td> </tr> </table> we obtain our <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="5"> <tr> <td align="center" colspan="3"> <font color="#770000">'''Desired Form of the Euler Equation'''</font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\frac{d^2r}{dt^2}</math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"><math>- \frac{1}{\rho} \frac{dP}{dr} -\frac{GM_r}{r^2} \, .</math></td> </tr> </table> Given as well that, <div align="center"> {{Math/EQ_SSmassConservation01}} </div> we see that, <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="5"> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\frac{dM_r}{4\pi r^2}</math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"><math>\rho dr</math></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{d^2r}{dt^2}</math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"><math>- 4\pi r^2 \frac{dP}{dM_r} -\frac{GM_r}{r^2} </math></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{1}{4\pi r^2}\cdot \frac{d^2r}{dt^2}</math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"><math>- \frac{dP}{dM_r} -\frac{GM_r}{4\pi r^4} \, .</math></td> </tr> </table> <span id="NormalizedEuler">Next,</span> if as [[#Core|above]], we multiply through by <math>\biggl[ K_c^{-10} G^9 M_\mathrm{tot}^7 \biggr]</math>, we obtain the relevant, <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="5"> <tr> <td align="center" colspan="3"> <font color="#770000">'''Normalized Euler Equation'''</font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\frac{1}{4\pi \tilde{r}^2}\cdot \frac{d^2\tilde{r}}{d\tilde{t}^2}</math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"><math>- \frac{d\tilde{P}}{d\tilde{M}_r} -\frac{\tilde{M}_r}{4\pi \tilde{r}^4} \, ,</math></td> </tr> </table> where, as a reminder, the dimensionless time is, <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="5"> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\tilde{t}</math></td> <td align="center"><math>\equiv</math></td> <td align="left"><math>t \biggl[K_c^{15} G^{-13} M_\mathrm{tot}^{-10} \biggr]^{1 / 4} \, .</math></td> </tr> </table> <table border="1" align="center" width=80%" cellpadding="8"> <tr><td align="left"> <div align="center"><font color="red"><b>CAUTION!</b></font> Regarding Our Chosen Lagrangian Fluid Marker</div> If we were to use <math>\tilde{r}</math> as our primary Lagrangian fluid marker, we would be in a position to analytically specify the function, <math>\tilde{M}_r(\tilde{r})</math>. Here, however, we will call upon <math>\tilde{M}_r</math> rather than <math>\tilde{r}</math> to serve as the primary Lagrangian fluid marker because mass facilitates our efforts to highlight a variety of important physical properties of bipolytropic configurations. We will therefore need to specify the function, <math>\tilde{r}(\tilde{M}_r)</math> instead of <math>\tilde{M}_r(\tilde{r})</math>. For the core, this choice does not introduce any particularly difficult computational challenges because we can invert the <math>\tilde{M}_r(\tilde{r})</math> relationship analytically to obtain … <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\xi^2</math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> 3\biggl[ 3\biggl(\frac{c_m}{\tilde{M}_r}\biggr)^{2/3} - 1\biggr]^{-1} \, , </math> </td> </tr> </table> where, <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="right"><math>c_m</math></td> <td align="center"><math>\equiv</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> m_\mathrm{surf}^{-1} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^2 \biggl(\frac{2\cdot 3}{\pi}\biggr)^{1 / 2} \, . </math> </td> </tr> </table> This is not the case for the envelope, however; we will not be able to analytically specify <math>\tilde{r}(\tilde{M}_r)</math>. This is unfortunate, as a ''numerical'' (rather than analytic) specification will necessarily introduce additional errors into our solution of the displacement function — which already is a small and error-prone quantity. We will nevertheless proceed along this line. </td></tr> </table>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to JETohlineWiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
JETohlineWiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Tiled Menu
Table of Contents
Old (VisTrails) Cover
Appendices
Variables & Parameters
Key Equations
Special Functions
Permissions
Formats
References
lsuPhys
Ramblings
Uploaded Images
Originals
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information