SSC/Stability/MoreGeneralApproach

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

More General Approach to the Parabolic Eigenvalue Problem[edit]

The material presented in this chapter is an extension of the chapter titled, Other Analytic Models and could also be considered to be a subsection of the associated chapter titled, Other Analytic Ramblings. More specifically, in the following "Introduction," we repeat a manipulation of the LAWE that was originally developed in the subsection of that chapter titled, "Consider Parabolic Case".



Material that appears after this point in our presentation is under development and therefore
may contain incorrect mathematical equations and/or physical misinterpretations.
|   Go Home   |


Introduction[edit]

In the case of a parabolic density distribution, the LAWE may be written in the form,

2(1x2)(2x2)[(α+x𝒢σ'𝒢σ)(53x2)σ2]

=

(𝒢σ'𝒢σ)+4x2x𝒢σ'𝒢σ


Let's try,

𝒢σ

=

(a0+a2x2)n(b0+b2x2)m,

which implies,

𝒢σ'

=

n(a0+a2x2)n1(2a2x)(b0+b2x2)m+m(a0+a2x2)n(b0+b2x2)m1(2b2x)

x𝒢σ'𝒢σ

=

n(a0+a2x2)1(2a2x2)+m(b0+b2x2)1(2b2x2)

 

=

2x2(a0+a2x2)(b0+b2x2)[na2(b0+b2x2)+mb2(a0+a2x2)]

 

=

2x2(a0+a2x2)(b0+b2x2)[(na2b0+mb2a0)+(na2b2+mb2a2)x2],

and,

𝒢σ'

=

nm(a0+a2x2)n1(2a2x)(b0+b2x2)m1(2b2x)+n(a0+a2x2)n1(2a2)(b0+b2x2)m+n(n1)(a0+a2x2)n2(2a2x)2(b0+b2x2)m

 

 

+mn(a0+a2x2)n1(2a2x)(b0+b2x2)m1(2b2x)+m(a0+a2x2)n(b0+b2x2)m1(2b2)+m(m1)(a0+a2x2)n(b0+b2x2)m2(2b2x)2

𝒢σ'𝒢σ

=

8nma2b2x2(a0+a2x2)1(b0+b2x2)1+n2a2(a0+a2x2)1+n(n1)4a22x2(a0+a2x2)2+m2b2(b0+b2x2)1+m(m1)4b22x2(b0+b2x2)2

 

=

2na2(b0+b2x2)+2mb2(a0+a2x2)(a0+a2x2)(b0+b2x2)+[4n(n1)a22(a0+a2x2)2+8nma2b2(a0+a2x2)(b0+b2x2)+4m(m1)b22(b0+b2x2)2]x2

So, we have for the LAWE:

LHS

=

2(1x2)(2x2)[(α+x𝒢σ'𝒢σ)(53x2)σ2]

 

=

2(1x2)(2x2)(a0+a2x2)(b0+b2x2){[α(a0+a2x2)(b0+b2x2)+2x2(na2b0+mb2a0)+2x4(na2b2+mb2a2)](53x2)

 

 

σ2(a0+a2x2)(b0+b2x2)};

RHS

=

(𝒢σ'𝒢σ)+4x2x𝒢σ'𝒢σ

 

=

2na2(b0+b2x2)+2mb2(a0+a2x2)(a0+a2x2)(b0+b2x2)+[4n(n1)a22(a0+a2x2)2+8nma2b2(a0+a2x2)(b0+b2x2)+4m(m1)b22(b0+b2x2)2]x2

 

 

+8(a0+a2x2)(b0+b2x2)[(na2b0+mb2a0)+(na2b2+mb2a2)x2]

 

=

1(a0+a2x2)(b0+b2x2){2na2(b0+b2x2)+2mb2(a0+a2x2)+8(na2b0+mb2a0)+8(na2b2+mb2a2)x2

 

 

+[8nma2b2+4n(n1)a22(b0+b2x2)(a0+a2x2)+4m(m1)b22(a0+a2x2)(b0+b2x2)]x2}.

Putting these together gives,

0

=

[α(a0+a2x2)(b0+b2x2)+2x2(na2b0+mb2a0)+2x4(na2b2+mb2a2)](53x2)σ2(a0+a2x2)(b0+b2x2)

 

 

[na2(b0+b2x2)+mb2(a0+a2x2)+4(na2b0+mb2a0)+4(na2b2+mb2a2)x2+4nma2b2x2](1x2)(2x2)

 

 

(1x2)(2x2)(a0+a2x2)(b0+b2x2)[2n(n1)a22(b0+b2x2)2+2m(m1)b22(a0+a2x2)2]x2.

Additional Setup[edit]

Benefitting from our earlier exploration of this problem, let's divide through by the product, (a0b0), and introduce the new variable notations,

λa2a0,       and       ηb2b0.

The LAWE becomes,

0

=

[α(1+λx2)(1+ηx2)+2x2(nλ+mη)+2x4(nλη+mηλ)](53x2)σ2(1+λx2)(1+ηx2)

 

 

[nλ(1+ηx2)+mη(1+λx2)+4(nλ+mη)+4(nλη+mηλ)x2+4nmληx2](1x2)(2x2)

 

 

(1x2)(2x2)(1+λx2)(1+ηx2)[2n(n1)λ2(1+ηx2)2+2m(m1)η2(1+λx2)2]x2.

Multiplying through by the denominator of the last term(s) — that is, multiplying through by (1+λx2)(1+ηx2) — will give us a polynomial with coefficient expressions for 6 terms (x0,x2,x4,x6,x8,x10) expressed in terms of 5 unknowns (σ2,n,m,λ,η).

Wouldn't a better strategy be to insert yet another quadratic factor — specifically, (1+βx2) — which will introduce two additional unknowns but only add one more term into the polynomial expression? This would bring the total number of coefficient expressions to 7 while simultaneously raising the number of unknowns to 7. It will be tedious and messy, but worth the try.

Expanding from Two to Three Quadratic Terms[edit]

Here we rearrange terms in the "parabolic" LAWE to construct the governing ODE as,

σ2

=

5(135x2)[α+x𝒢σ'𝒢σ](1x2)(112x2)[(𝒢σ'𝒢σ)+4x2x𝒢σ'𝒢σ]

Let's try,

𝒢σ

=

(1+λx2)n(1+ηx2)m(1+βx2),

or, in an effort to permit writing more compact expressions,

𝒢σ

=

NnMmL,

where,

N(1+λx2);       M(1+ηx2);       and       L(1+βx2).      

This implies (after some whiteboard derivations),

x𝒢σ'𝒢σ

=

2x2NML[βMN+mηLN+nλLM],

𝒢σ'𝒢σ

=

4x2NML[β(mηN+nλM)+mη(βN+nλL)+nλ(βM+mηL)]

 

 

+2βL2[1+x2β(21)]+2mηM2[1+x2η(2m1)]+2nλN2[1+x2λ(2n1)].

Specific Values of Quadratic Coefficients[edit]

Now, if we assume that,

λ=1;       η=12;       and       β=35.      

the "parabolic" LAWE becomes,


Lσ2

=

5L2[α+x𝒢σ'𝒢σ]NML[(𝒢σ'𝒢σ)+4x2x𝒢σ'𝒢σ].

Then, plugging in the expressions for 𝒢σ and its derivatives, we have,

Lσ2

=

5L2{α+2x2NML[βMN+mηLN+nλLM]}

 

 

{4x2[β(mηN+nλM)+mη(βN+nλL)+nλ(βM+mηL)]+8[βMN+mηLN+nλLM]}

 

 

NML{2βL2[1+x2β(21)]+2mηM2[1+x2η(2m1)]+2nλN2[1+x2λ(2n1)]}

 

=

5L2{α2x2NML[35MN+12mLN+nLM]}

 

 

+{4x2[35(12mN+nM)+12m(35N+nL)+n(35M+12mL)]+8[35MN+12mLN+nLM]}

 

 

+{6NM5L[135(21)x2]+mNLM[112(2m1)x2]+2nMLN[1(2n1)x2]}

NML2σ2

=

5L2{NMLα2x2[35MN+12mLN+nLM]}

 

 

+NML{4x2[35(12mN+nM)+12m(35N+nL)+n(35M+12mL)]+8[35MN+12mLN+nLM]}

 

 

+{65N2M2[135(21)x2]+mN2L2[112(2m1)x2]+2nM2L2[1(2n1)x2]}

σ2

=

5L{α2x2[35(1L)+12m(1M)+n(1N)]}

 

 

+1L{4x2[35(12mN+nM)+12m(35N+nL)+n(35M+12mL)]+8[35MN+12mLN+nLM]}

 

 

+1L{65[NML][135(21)x2]+m[NLM][112(2m1)x2]+2n[MLN][1(2n1)x2]}

 

=

5L{α+2[(L1)(1L)+(M1)m(1M)+(N1)n(1N)]}

 

 

+4L{65MN+mLN+2nLM+(L1)(12mN+nM)+(M1)m(35N+nL)+(N1)n(35M+12mL)}

 

 

+1L{65[NML][1+(L1)(21)]+m[NLM][1+(M1)(2m1)]+2n[MLN][1+(N1)(2n1)]}

 

=

5L{α+2[(11L)+(11M)m+(11N)n]}

 

 

+4L{65MN+mLN+2nLM+(12mNL+nML)(12mN+nM)+m(35NM+nLM)m(35N+nL)+n(35MN+12mLN)n(35M+12mL)}

 

 

+1L{65[NML][2(1)+L(21)]+m[NLM][2(1m)+M(2m1)]+2n[MLN][2(1n)+N(2n1)]}

 

=

5L{α+2(+m+n)2[(L)+(mM)+(nN)]}

 

 

+2L{65NM[2+m+n]+mLN[2++n]+2nLM[2++m]}}+1L{65NM[(21)]+mLN[(2m1)]+2nLM[(2n1)]}

 

 

+1L{65NM[2L(1)]+mLN[2M(1m)]+2nLM[2N(1n)]}4L{[mN(12+35)+nM(1+35)+mnL(1+12)]

 

=

5L{α+2(+m+n)2[(L)+(mM)+(nN)]}+(3+2m+2n+2)L[65NM+mLN+2nLM]

 

 

4L{35[NML](1)+12[LNM]m(m1)+[LMN]n(n1)}4L{[mN(12+35)+nM(1+35)+mnL(1+12)]}

See Also[edit]

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |