SSC/Stability/GammaVariation
How Does Stability Change with γg?
Isolated Uniform-Density Configuration
From our separate discussion, the relevant LAWE is,
where, , , and
|
|
Also, the two relevant boundary conditions are,
at
and,
|
|
|
at |
Alternatively, this last expression may be written as,
|
|
|
|
From the general solution derived by 📚 T. E. Sterne (1937, MNRAS, Vol. 97, pp. 582 - 593), we have …
|
|
|
The first few solutions are displayed in the following boxed-in image that has been extracted directly from §2 (p. 587) of 📚 Sterne (1937); to the right of his table, we have added a column that expressly records the value of the square of the normalized eigenfrequency that corresponds to each of the solutions presented by Sterne37.
|
Based on exact eigenvector expressions extracted from §2 (p. 587) of … |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
Check j = 0: The eigenvector is , that is, homologous contraction/expansion, in which case both the first and the second derivative of are zero. Hence, this eigenvector is a solution to the LAWE only if . What about the two boundary conditions? Well, the central boundary condition is immediately satisfied; for the outer boundary condition, we see that the logarithmic derivative of is supposed to be zero, which it is because it equals . Finally, since , we see that the oscillation frequency is given by the expression,
Check j = 1: The eigenvector is , hence, , and, This means that,
| LAWE | ||
which goes to zero if , in which case,
|
|
Is the surface boundary condition satisfied? Well …
|
|
which matches the desired logarithmic slope, .

