Appendix/Ramblings/PowerSeriesExpressions
Approximate Power-Series Expressions[edit]
Broadly Used Mathematical Expressions (shown here without proof)[edit]
Binomial[edit]
|
|
|
for |
|
LaTeX mathematical expressions cut-and-pasted directly from
|
|||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
As a primary point of reference, note that according to §1.2 of NIST's Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, the binomial theorem states that,
where, for nonnegative integer values of and and , the notation,
Our Example: Setting gives,
|
Note, for example, that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See also:
Exponential[edit]
|
|
|
|
Expressions with Astrophysical Relevance[edit]
Polytropic Lane-Emden Function[edit]
We seek a power-series expression for the polytropic, Lane-Emden function, — expanded about the coordinate center, — that approximately satisfies the Lane-Emden equation,
A general power-series should be of the form,
|
|
|
|
First derivative:
|
|
|
|
Left-hand-side of Lane-Emden equation:
|
|
|
|
Right-hand-side of Lane-Emden equation (adopt the normalization, , then use the binomial theorem recursively):
|
|
|
|
where,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First approximation: Assume that , in which case the LHS contains terms only up through . This means that we must ignore all terms on the RHS that are of higher order than ; that is,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expressions for the various coefficients can now be determined by equating terms on the LHS and RHS that have like powers of . Remembering to include a negative sign on the RHS, we find:
| Term | LHS | RHS | Implication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By including higher and higher order terms in the series expansion for , and proceeding along the same line of deductive reasoning, one finds:
- Expressions for the four coefficients, , remain unchanged.
- The coefficient is zero for all other terms that contain odd powers of ; specifically, for example, .
- The coefficients of and are, respectively,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In summary, the desired, approximate power-series expression for the polytropic Lane-Emden function is:
| For Spherically Symmetric Configurations | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
NOTE: For cylindrically symmetric, rather than spherically symmetric, configurations, the analogous power-series expression appears as equation (15) in the article by J. P. Ostriker (1964, ApJ, 140, 1056) titled, The Equilibrium of Polytropic and Isothermal Cylinders.
Isothermal Lane-Emden Function[edit]
Here we seek a power-series expression for the isothermal, Lane-Emden function — expanded about the coordinate center — that approximately satisfies the isothermal Lane-Emden equation; making the variable substitution (sorry for the unnecessary complication!), , the governing ODE is,
|
|
|
|
A general power-series should be of the form,
|
|
|
|
Derivatives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Put together, then, the left-hand-side of the isothermal Lane-Emden equation becomes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing on the above power-series expression for an exponential function, and adopting the convention that , the right-hand-side becomes,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expressions for the various coefficients can now be determined by equating terms on the LHS and RHS that have like powers of . Beginning with the highest order terms, we initially find,
| Term | LHS | RHS | Implication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With this initial set of coefficient values in hand, we can rewrite (and significantly simplify) our approximate expression for the RHS, namely,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing, then, with equating terms with like powers on both sides of the equation, we find,
| Term | LHS | RHS | Implication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Result:
| For Spherically Symmetric Configurations | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
See also:
- Equation (377) from §22 in Chapter IV of C67.
NOTE: For cylindrically symmetric, rather than spherically symmetric, configurations, an analytic expression for the function, , is presented as equation (56) in a paper by J. P. Ostriker (1964, ApJ, 140, 1056) titled, The Equilibrium of Polytropic and Isothermal Cylinders.
Displacement Function for Polytropic LAWE[edit]
The LAWE for polytropic spheres may be written as,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where, is the polytropic Lane-Emden function describing the configuration's unperturbed radial density distribution, and , , and are constants. Here we seek a power-series expression for the displacement function, , expanded about the center of the configuration, that approximately satisfies this LAWE.
First we note that, near the center, an accurate power-series expression for the polytropic Lane-Emden function is,
|
|
|
|
Hence,
|
|
|
|
Therefore, near the center of the configuration, the LAWE may be written as,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where, and, for present purposes, we have kept terms in the series no higher than .
Displacement Finite at Center[edit]
Let's adopt a power-series expression for the displacement function of a form that is finite at the center of the configuration, namely,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and,
|
|
|
|
Substituting these expressions into the LAWE gives,
|
|
|
|
Expressions for the various coefficients can now be determined by equating terms on the LHS and RHS that have like powers of .
| Term | LHS | RHS | Implication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In summary, the desired, approximate power-series expression for the polytropic displacement function is:
|
Displacement Function for Isothermal LAWE[edit]
The LAWE for isothermal spheres may be written as,
|
|
|
|
where, is the isothermal Lane-Emden function describing the configuration's unperturbed radial density distribution, and , , and are constants. Here we seek a power-series expression for the displacement function, , expanded about the center of the configuration, that approximately satisfies this LAWE.
First we note that, near the center, an accurate power-series expression for the isothermal Lane-Emden function is,
|
|
|
|
Hence,
|
|
|
|
Therefore, near the center of the configuration, the LAWE may be written as,
|
|
|
|
Let's now adopt a power-series expression for the displacement function of the form,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and,
|
|
|
|
Substituting these expressions into the LAWE gives,
|
|
|
|
Keeping terms only up through leads to the following simplification:
|
|
|
|
where,
Finally, balancing terms of like powers on both sides of the equation leads us to conclude the following:
| Term | LHS | RHS | Implication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In summary, the desired, approximate power-series expression for the isothermal displacement function is:
|
Maclaurin Spheroid Index Symbols[edit]
In our accompanying discussion of the equilibrium properties of models along the Maclaurin spheroid sequence, we find the "Index Symbols" expressions,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where,
|
|
|
(always positive). |
Our aim, here, is to derive a power-series expression for these two index symbols (a) in the case of nearly spherical configurations , and (b) in the case of an infinitesimally thin disk .
Nearly Spherical Configurations[edit]
On p. 457 of [CRC], we find that,
|
|
|
for, |
Also, from the above binomial-theorem expression, we have,
|
|
|
for |
|
|
|
|
So we can write,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This looks okay, in the sense that .
Infinitesimally Thin Axisymmetric Disk[edit]
As — that is, in the case of an infinitesimally thin, axisymmetric disk — the preferred small parameter is,
|
|
|
|
Recognizing as well that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the expressions for the pair of relevant index symbols may be rewritten as,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pulling again from p. 457 of [CRC], we find that,
|
|
|
for, |
|
LAGNIAPPE:
According to the above binomial-theorem expression, we find for ,
Hence,
(continue expression simplification)
|
Referring again to the above binomial-theorem expression, we find for ,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We therefore can write,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once again from the binomial theorem,
|
|
|
|
which gives us,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice that, to the highest order retained in these expressions, we find as expected that, .
Frequency (temporary)[edit]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taylor Series (Hunter77)[edit]
First (Unsuccessful) Try[edit]
First:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that, replacing the term with the expression derived in the Second step, below, gives,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then, replacing the term with the expression derived in the Third step, below, gives,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now, replacing the term with the expression derived in the Third step, below, gives,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And, finally:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Result:
|
Definitely WRONG! |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
When I used an Excel spreadsheet to test this out against a parabola, the integration quickly became wildly unstable, strongly suggesting that there is an error in the derivation. My first attempt to uncover this error produced a new coefficient on the , namely,
|
Somewhat Improved |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Although it showed improvement, this expression still blows up. So I have not bothered to revise the original (definitely WRONG!) derivation. Instead, let's start all over and approach it with a more gradual derivation.
Second Try[edit]
We will work from the following foundation expression in which is the variable that we desire to evaluate, and the "known" quantities are: , , , , and .
|
|
|
|
Let's use similar Taylor-series expansions for , , etc. in order to eliminate the term, the term, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This expression works very well for a parabola.
Second:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This also allows us to improve the expression for the term, as initially derived in the "First" subsection, above. Namely,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence, an improved expression for is,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, then:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |