SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic1.53/Pt2

From JETohlineWiki
Revision as of 17:30, 15 January 2024 by Joel2 (talk | contribs) (→See Also)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

BiPolytrope with (nc, ne) = (3/2, 3)


Part I:  Milne's (1930) EOS

 


Part II:  Point-Source Model

 


Part III:  Our Derivation

 


The Point-Source Model

According to Chapter IX.3 (p. 332) of [C67], in the so-called "point-source" model, "… it is assumed that the entire source of energy is liberated at the center of the star; analytically, the assumption is that Lr=constant=L."

Handling Radiation Transport

Here we begin with the familiar expression for the radiation flux,

F→rad

=

−c3ρκR∇(aradT4)

=

−χrad∇T,

[Shu92], Vol. I, §2, p. 17, Eq. (2.17)

and    [T78], §3.4, p. 57, Eq. (67)

where [T78] refers to

χrad

≡

4caradT33κρ,

[T78], §3.4, p. 57, Eq. (68)

as the coefficient of radiative conductivity. When modeling spherically symmetric configurations, the radiation flux has only a radial component, that is, F→rad=e^r(Fr). And, as pointed out in the context of Eq. (170) on p. 214 of [C67] … the quantity Lr≡4πr2Fr, which is the net amount of energy crossing a spherical surface of radius r, is generally introduced instead of Fr. We therefore have,

Lr4πr2 = −c3ρκRddr(aradT4)

⇒dTdr

= −34caradρκRT3Lr4πr2

[C67], Chapter V, Eq. (171)
[Clayton68], §6, Eq. (6-4a)
[KW94], §9.1, Eq. (9.6)
[HK94], §7.1, Eq. (7.8)
[BLRY07], §5.2, Eq. (5.15)

Dimensional Analysis:

κRLcarad ∼ rT4ρ∼m−1ℓ4(∘K)4.

NOTE: This is consistent with the opacity, κR∼(ℓ2m−1).

Harrison's Approach

Following 📚 M. Hall Harrison (1946, ApJ, Vol. 103, pp. 193 - 206), we seek to solve this last expression in concert with solutions to a pair of additional key governing relations for spherically symmetric equilibrium configurations, namely,

dPdr=−GMrρr2

;      

dMrdr=4πr2ρ

📚 Hall Harrison (1946), p. 196, Eq. (20)

while adopting (see related discussion)

Form A
of the Ideal Gas Equation of State,

Pgas=ℜμ¯ρT

and adopting Kramers' opacity law, that is,

κR→κKramers = κ0ρT−7/2.

Dimensional Analysis:

[κ0Lcarad] ∼ rT15/2ρ2∼m−2ℓ7(∘K)15/2
ℜμ ∼ t−2ℓ2(∘K)−1

We note as well that the leading coefficient in Kramers' opacity is,

κ0 ≈ 5×1022cm5g−2(∘K)7/2.

[Clayton68], §3.3, Eq. (3-170)
[KW94], §17.2, Eq. (17.5)
[HK94], §4.4.2, Eq. (4.35)

Does a Polytropic Relation Work?

Let's examine whether a point-source model can be represented by a polytropic relation.

Adopting Temperature (instead of enthalpy)

P = Kρ1+1/n⇒ρ=(PK)n/(n+1);
(ℜμ)ρT = Kρ1+1/n⇒T=(Kℜ/μ)ρ1/n;
Tn = (Kℜ/μ)nρ⇒Tn=(Kℜ/μ)n(PK)n/(n+1)⇒T(n+1)=(Kℜ/μ)(n+1)(PK).

Hydrostatic balance is governed by the single 2nd order ODE,

1r2ddr[r2ρdPdr] = −4πGρ.

Normally in order to arrive at the Lane-Emden equation, P is converted to ρ; here, let's convert both P and ρ to T. First, on the RHS we have,

ρ = (ℜ/μK)nTn;

and second, on the LHS we have,

1ρdPdr =

(Kℜ/μ)nT−n⋅ddr[K−n(ℜ/μ)(n+1)T(n+1)]

  =

(ℜμ)T−n⋅ddr[T(n+1)]

  =

(n+1)(ℜμ)dTdr

  =

(n+1)(ℜμ){−34caradρκRT3L4πr2}

  =

−(n+1)(ℜμ)[3L16πcarad][ρr2T3]κ0ρT−7/2

⇒r2ρdPdr =

−(n+1)(ℜμ)[3κ0L16πcarad]ρ2T−13/2

  =

−(n+1)K−2n(ℜμ)2n+1[3κ0L16πcarad]T(4n−13)/2.

So, the hydrostatic-balance condition becomes,

−(n+1)K−2n(ℜμ)2n+1[3κ0L16πcarad]⋅1r2dT(4n−13)/2dr

= −4πG(ℜ/μK)nTn

⇒(n+1)4πGK2n(ℜ/μK)−n(ℜμ)2n+1[3κ0L16πcarad]⋅1r2dT(4n−13)/2dr

= Tn

⇒𝒜r2dT(4n−13)/2dr

= Tn
⇒𝒜−1r2dr =

T−n⋅dT(4n−13)/2,

where,

𝒜 ≡

(n+1)4πGKn(ℜμ)n+1[3κ0L16πcarad].


Dimensional Analysis:

[κ0Lcarad] ∼ m−2ℓ7(∘K)15/2
ℜμ ∼ t−2ℓ2(∘K)−1
polytropic K ∼ t−2ℓ2+3/nm−1/n

Hence,

𝒜 ∼ G−1K−n(ℜμ)n+1[m−2ℓ7(∘K)15/2]
  ∼ [ℓ−3mt2][t−2ℓ2+3/nm−1/n]−n[t−2ℓ2(∘K)−1]n+1[m−2ℓ7(∘K)15/2]
  ∼ [ℓ−3][ℓ2+3/n]−n[ℓ2]n+1[ℓ7](∘K)13/2−n∼ℓ3(∘K)13/2−n.

Now, the characteristic length scale for polytropic configurations is given by the expression,

an2≡[(n+1)K4πG⋅ρc(1−n)/n].

If we divide 𝒜 by an3, the resulting expression should give us the characteristic temperature of the envelope. Specifically, we find that,

𝒜an3 =

(n+1)4πGKn(ℜμ)n+1[3κ0L16πcarad]×[(n+1)Kn4πG⋅ρc(1−n)/n]−3/2

  =

(n+1)−1/2ρc3(n−1)/2n(ℜμ)n+1[3κ0L16πcarad](4πG)1/2K−n−3/2

  ∼

[mℓ−3]3(n−1)/2n[t−2ℓ2(∘K)−1]n+1[m−2ℓ7(∘K)15/2][ℓ3m−1t−2]1/2[t−2ℓ2+3/nm−1/n]−n−3/2

  ∼

t−2n−2−1+2n+3m3(n−1)/2n−2−1/2+1+3/2nℓ−9(n−1)/2n+2n+2+7+3/2[ℓ(2n+3)/n]−(2n+3)/2(∘K)13/2−n

  ∼

ℓ(9+4n2+12n)/2nℓ−(2n+3)2/2n(∘K)13/2−n

  ∼

(∘K)(13−2n)/2.


Quite generally we can write,

1αdTαdr =

Tα−1dTdr.

Rewriting the hydrostatic-balance condition, we find that,

𝒜−1r2 =

T−n⋅ddr[T(4n−13)/2]=T−n(4n−132)T(4n−15)/2⋅dTdr=(4n−132)T(2n−15)/2⋅dTdr.

Associating the exponents,

α−1 =

2n−152⇒α=2n−132,

we can write,

𝒜−1r2 =

(4n−132)(22n−13)ddr[T(2n−13)/2]

⇒3d(r3) =

𝒜(4n−132n−13)d[T(2n−13)/2]

⇒0 =

d[𝒜(13−4n13−2n)T(2n−13)/2−3r3]

⇒ constant =

𝒜an3(13−4n13−2n)T(2n−13)/2−3(ran)3.

Adopting Enthalpy (instead of Temperature)

For polytropic configurations the enthalpy, H, can easily be adopted in place of temperature via the relation,

(ℜμ)T = H(n+1).

Hence,

P = Kρ1+1/n;         H = Kρ1/n;         Hn+1 = KnP.

And the radiation-transport equation can be rewritten in the form,

Lr4πr2 = −carad3ρκR(n+1)4(ℜμ)−4dH4dr
  = −carad3κ0(n+1)4(ℜμ)−4[ρ−2T7/2]dH4dr
  = −carad3κ0(n+1)4(ℜμ)−4{(KH)2n[(ℜμ)−1H(n+1)]7/2}4H3dHdr
  = −4caradK2n3κ0(n+1)15/2(ℜμ)−15/2H(13−4n)/2dHdr
⇒r2dHdr = −[3κ0L(n+1)15/216πcaradK2n(ℜμ)15/2]H(4n−13)/2 .

In terms of the enthalpy, the hydrostatic-balance expression becomes,

−4πG[HnKn] = 1r2ddr{r2[KnHn]ddr[K−nHn+1]}
⇒−4πGHn = Knr2ddr{[r2Hn]ddr[Hn+1]}
  = (n+1)Knr2ddr{r2dHdr}.

Combining these two equations gives,

r2Hn = ℬ⋅ddr{H(4n−13)/2}
  = (4n−13)ℬ2⋅H(4n−15)/2dHdr
⇒[2(4n−13)ℬ]r2 = H(2n−15)/2dHdr

where,

ℬ ≡ [3κ0L(n+1)17/264π2GcaradKn(ℜμ)15/2].

As above, quite generally we can write,

1αdHαdr =

Hα−1dHdr.

So, associating the exponents, we appreciate that,

α−1 =

2n−152⇒α=2n−132.

Hence, we have,

[2(4n−13)ℬ]r2 = 2(2n−13)ddr[H(2n−13)/2]
⇒r2 = (4n−13)ℬ(2n−13)ddr[H(2n−13)/2]
⇒d[r3an3] = 3(4n−13)ℬ(2n−13)an3⋅d[H(2n−13)/2]
⇒d[ξ3] = [3(4n−13)(2n−13)][ℬan3⋅Hnorm(2n−13)/2]d[HHnorm](2n−13)/2;

so, if we adopt the definition,

Hnorm ≡

[(2n−13)3(4n−13)⋅an3ℬ]2/(2n−13),

the relation becomes,

d[ξ3] = d[HHnorm](2n−13)/2.

Power-Law Density Distribution

In an accompanying discussion, we have demonstrated that power-law density distributions can provide analytic solutions of the Lane-Emden equation, although the associated boundary conditions do not naturally conform to the boundary conditions that are suitable to astrophysical configurations. We have just shown that the point-source envelope configuration appears to admit a power-law temperature (alternatively, enthalpy) solution. Via the polytropic relation, H=Kρ1/n, we can convert to the density-radius relation,

d[ξ3] = [Kρc1/nHnorm](2n−13)/2d[ρρc](2n−13)/2n

which, upon integration gives,

constant = [ρρc](2n−13)/2n−ξ3,

if we adopt the definition,

ρc ≡ (HnormK)n.

Setting the integration constant to zero, our result gives,

ρρc ∝ ξ6n/(2n−13).

In astrophysically relevant configurations, the exponent on ξ must be negative, which means that we are confined to models for which n<72.

Now, from our associated discussion of power-law density distributions in polytropes, we discovered that hydrostatic balance can be established at all radial positions within a spherically symmetric configuration for power-law density distributions of the form,

ρρc∝ξ−2n/(n−1)

This matches our just-derived point-source model if,

6n/(2n−13) = −2n/(n−1)
⇒6(n−1) = 2(13−2n)
⇒n = 165,

which is less than 72, so it is an astrophysically viable result.

See Also


Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |