SSC/Stability/GammaVariation: Difference between revisions

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Line 175: Line 175:
   <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
   <td align="right">&nbsp;</td>
   <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
   <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
   <td align="left"><math>\frac{7}{5}\chi_0^2 \biggl[\frac{196}{10} \cdot \frac{5}{7} - \mathfrak{F} \biggr]  
   <td align="left"><math>\frac{7}{5}\chi_0^2 \biggl[14 - \mathfrak{F} \biggr]  
+ \biggl[\mathfrak{F} - 14\biggr]
+ \biggl[\mathfrak{F} - 14\biggr] \, ,
   </math></td>
   </math></td>
</tr>
</tr>
</table>
</table>
which goes to zero if <math>\mathfrak{F} = 14</math>, in which case,
<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="5">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\frac{\omega^2}{4\pi G\bar\rho} 
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="right">
<math>
\frac{1}{3}\biggl[ \frac{\gamma_\mathrm{g}\mathfrak{F}}{2} - 4 + 3\gamma_\mathrm{g} \biggr]
=
\frac{2}{3} \biggl[5\gamma_\mathrm{g} - 2 \biggr] \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
Is the surface boundary condition satisfied?  Well &hellip;
<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="5">
<tr>
  <td align="right"><math>\frac{d\ln x}{d\chi_0}\biggr|_{\chi_0=1} = \biggl[\frac{1}{x} \cdot \frac{dx}{d\chi_0}\biggr]_{\chi_0=1} 
</math></td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="right">
<math>
\biggl[\biggl( 1 - \tfrac{7}{5}\chi_0^2\biggr)^{-1} \biggl(-\frac{14}{5}\biggr)\chi_0\biggr]_{\chi_0=1}
=
\biggl[\biggl( - \frac{2}{5} \biggr)^{-1} \biggl(-\frac{14}{5}\biggr)\biggr]
=
+7 \, ,
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
which matches the desired logarithmic slope, <math>\mathfrak{F}/2</math>.


=How Does Stability Change with P<sub>e</sub>?=
=How Does Stability Change with P<sub>e</sub>?=

Revision as of 14:42, 8 January 2024

How Does Stability Change with γg?

Isolated Uniform-Density Configuration

From our separate discussion, the relevant LAWE is,

1(1χ02){(1χ02)d2xdχ02+4χ0[132χ02]dxdχ0+𝔉x} = 0,

where, χ0r0/R, α(34/γg), and

𝔉

[3ω22πγgGρ¯2(34γg)]γg𝔉2=[3ω24πGρ¯+43γg]

Also, the two relevant boundary conditions are,

dxdχ0=0        at         χ0=0;

and,

dlnxdχ0

=

1γg(43γg+3ω24πGρ¯)        at         χ0=1.

Alternatively, this last expression may be written as,

dlnxdχ0|χ0=1

=

𝔉2.


From the general solution derived by 📚 T. E. Sterne (1937, MNRAS, Vol. 97, pp. 582 - 593), we have …

Sterne (1937)
Sterne (1937)
Sterne (1937)
Sterne (1937)

The first few solutions are displayed in the following boxed-in image that has been extracted directly from §2 (p. 587) of 📚 Sterne (1937); to the right of his table, we have added a column that expressly records the value of the square of the normalized eigenfrequency that corresponds to each of the solutions presented by Sterne37.

Based on exact eigenvector expressions extracted from §2 (p. 587) of …
T. E. Sterne (1937)
Models of Radial Oscillation
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 97, pp. 582 - 593

ω24πGρ¯

j=0;      𝔉=0;       x=1
γ4/3
j=1;      𝔉=14;      x=1(7/5)χ02
2(5γ2)/3
j=2;      𝔉=36;      x=1(18/5)χ02+(99/35)χ04
7γ4/3
j=3;      𝔉=66;      x=1(33/5)χ02+(429/35)χ04(143/21)χ06
12γ4/3

Check j = 0:    The eigenvector is x=1, that is, homologous contraction/expansion, in which case both the first and the second derivative of x are zero. Hence, this eigenvector is a solution to the LAWE only if 𝔉=0. What about the two boundary conditions? Well, the central boundary condition is immediately satisfied; for the outer boundary condition, we see that the logarithmic derivative of x is supposed to be zero, which it is because it equals 𝔉/2. Finally, since 𝔉=0, we see that the oscillation frequency is given by the expression,

ω24πGρ¯=γg4/3.

Check j = 1:    The eigenvector is x=175χ02, hence, dx/dχ0=145χ0, and, d2x/dχ02=145. This means that,

LAWE = 145(1χ02)[132χ02]565+𝔉[175χ02]
  = χ02[145+1681075𝔉]+[145565+𝔉]
  = 75χ02[14𝔉]+[𝔉14],

which goes to zero if 𝔉=14, in which case,

ω24πGρ¯ =

13[γg𝔉24+3γg]=23[5γg2].

Is the surface boundary condition satisfied? Well …

dlnxdχ0|χ0=1=[1xdxdχ0]χ0=1 =

[(175χ02)1(145)χ0]χ0=1=[(25)1(145)]=+7,

which matches the desired logarithmic slope, 𝔉/2.

How Does Stability Change with Pe?