SSC/Stability/GammaVariation: Difference between revisions
| Line 175: | Line 175: | ||
<td align="right"> </td> | <td align="right"> </td> | ||
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td> | <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> | ||
<td align="left"><math>\frac{7}{5}\chi_0^2 \biggl[ | <td align="left"><math>\frac{7}{5}\chi_0^2 \biggl[14 - \mathfrak{F} \biggr] | ||
+ \biggl[\mathfrak{F} - 14\biggr] | + \biggl[\mathfrak{F} - 14\biggr] \, , | ||
</math></td> | </math></td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
which goes to zero if <math>\mathfrak{F} = 14</math>, in which case, | |||
<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="5"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"><math>\frac{\omega^2}{4\pi G\bar\rho} | |||
</math></td> | |||
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math> | |||
\frac{1}{3}\biggl[ \frac{\gamma_\mathrm{g}\mathfrak{F}}{2} - 4 + 3\gamma_\mathrm{g} \biggr] | |||
= | |||
\frac{2}{3} \biggl[5\gamma_\mathrm{g} - 2 \biggr] \, . | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
Is the surface boundary condition satisfied? Well … | |||
<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="5"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"><math>\frac{d\ln x}{d\chi_0}\biggr|_{\chi_0=1} = \biggl[\frac{1}{x} \cdot \frac{dx}{d\chi_0}\biggr]_{\chi_0=1} | |||
</math></td> | |||
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math> | |||
\biggl[\biggl( 1 - \tfrac{7}{5}\chi_0^2\biggr)^{-1} \biggl(-\frac{14}{5}\biggr)\chi_0\biggr]_{\chi_0=1} | |||
= | |||
\biggl[\biggl( - \frac{2}{5} \biggr)^{-1} \biggl(-\frac{14}{5}\biggr)\biggr] | |||
= | |||
+7 \, , | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
which matches the desired logarithmic slope, <math>\mathfrak{F}/2</math>. | |||
=How Does Stability Change with P<sub>e</sub>?= | =How Does Stability Change with P<sub>e</sub>?= | ||
Revision as of 14:42, 8 January 2024
How Does Stability Change with γg?
Isolated Uniform-Density Configuration
From our separate discussion, the relevant LAWE is,
where, , , and
|
|
Also, the two relevant boundary conditions are,
at
and,
|
|
|
at |
Alternatively, this last expression may be written as,
|
|
|
|
From the general solution derived by 📚 T. E. Sterne (1937, MNRAS, Vol. 97, pp. 582 - 593), we have …
|
|
|
The first few solutions are displayed in the following boxed-in image that has been extracted directly from §2 (p. 587) of 📚 Sterne (1937); to the right of his table, we have added a column that expressly records the value of the square of the normalized eigenfrequency that corresponds to each of the solutions presented by Sterne37.
|
Based on exact eigenvector expressions extracted from §2 (p. 587) of … |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
Check j = 0: The eigenvector is , that is, homologous contraction/expansion, in which case both the first and the second derivative of are zero. Hence, this eigenvector is a solution to the LAWE only if . What about the two boundary conditions? Well, the central boundary condition is immediately satisfied; for the outer boundary condition, we see that the logarithmic derivative of is supposed to be zero, which it is because it equals . Finally, since , we see that the oscillation frequency is given by the expression,
Check j = 1: The eigenvector is , hence, , and, This means that,
| LAWE | ||
which goes to zero if , in which case,
|
|
Is the surface boundary condition satisfied? Well …
|
|
which matches the desired logarithmic slope, .

