SSC/Stability/GammaVariation: Difference between revisions
| Line 152: | Line 152: | ||
<math>\frac{\omega^2}{4\pi G\bar\rho} = \gamma_\mathrm{g} - 4/3 \, .</math> | <math>\frac{\omega^2}{4\pi G\bar\rho} = \gamma_\mathrm{g} - 4/3 \, .</math> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<b><font color="red">Check j = 1:</font></b> | |||
The eigenvector is <math>x = 1 - \tfrac{7}{5} \chi_0^2</math>, hence, <math>dx/d\chi_0 = -\tfrac{14}{5}\chi_0</math>, and, <math>d^2x/d\chi_0^2 = - \tfrac{14}{5} \, .</math> This means that, | |||
<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="5"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right">LAWE</td> | |||
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td> | |||
<td align="left"><math> | |||
- \frac{14}{5}(1-\chi_0^2) - \biggl[1 - \frac{3}{2}\chi_0^2\biggr]\frac{56}{5} + \mathfrak{F}\biggl[1 - \frac{7}{5}\chi_0^2\biggr] | |||
</math></td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> </td> | |||
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td> | |||
<td align="left"><math>\chi_0^2 \biggl[\frac{14}{5} + \frac{168}{10} - \frac{7}{5}\mathfrak{F} \biggr] + \biggl[-\frac{14}{5} -\frac{56}{5} + \mathfrak{F}\biggr] | |||
</math></td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> </td> | |||
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td> | |||
<td align="left"><math>\chi_0^2 \biggl[\frac{14}{5} + \frac{168}{10} - \frac{7}{5}\mathfrak{F} \biggr] | |||
+ \biggl[\mathfrak{F} - 14\biggr] | |||
</math></td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
=How Does Stability Change with P<sub>e</sub>?= | =How Does Stability Change with P<sub>e</sub>?= | ||
Revision as of 01:09, 8 January 2024
How Does Stability Change with γg?
Isolated Uniform-Density Configuration
From our separate discussion, the relevant LAWE is,
where, , , and
|
|
Also, the two relevant boundary conditions are,
at
and,
|
|
|
at |
Alternatively, this last expression may be written as,
|
|
|
|
From the general solution derived by 📚 T. E. Sterne (1937, MNRAS, Vol. 97, pp. 582 - 593), we have …
|
|
|
The first few solutions are displayed in the following boxed-in image that has been extracted directly from §2 (p. 587) of 📚 Sterne (1937); to the right of his table, we have added a column that expressly records the value of the square of the normalized eigenfrequency that corresponds to each of the solutions presented by Sterne37.
|
Based on exact eigenvector expressions extracted from §2 (p. 587) of … |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
Check j = 0: The eigenvector is , that is, homologous contraction/expansion, in which case both the first and the second derivative of are zero. Hence, this eigenvector is a solution to the LAWE only if . What about the two boundary conditions? Well, the central boundary condition is immediately satisfied; for the outer boundary condition, we see that the logarithmic derivative of is supposed to be zero, which it is because it equals . Finally, since , we see that the oscillation frequency is given by the expression,
Check j = 1: The eigenvector is , hence, , and, This means that,
| LAWE | ||

