SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/RedGiantToPN/Pt2: Difference between revisions
| Line 718: | Line 718: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
===The n<sub>e</sub> = 1 Envelope=== | |||
<table border="1" cellpadding="8" width="80%" align="center"><tr><td align="left"> | |||
Let's compare this with the equivalent expression [[SSC/Stability/InstabilityOnsetOverview#Polytropic_Stability|presented separately]], namely, | |||
<div align="center"> | |||
<font color="maroon"><b>Polytropic LAWE (linear adiabatic wave equation)</b></font><br /> | |||
{{ Math/EQ_RadialPulsation02 }} | |||
</div> | |||
The [[SSC/Structure/Polytropes/Analytic#n_=_5_Polytrope|equilibrium, off-center equilibrium solution]] for n = 1 polytropes states that, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>\phi_{n=1}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
- \frac{A}{\eta} \cdot \sin(B-\eta) | |||
\, ; | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>\frac{d\phi}{d\eta}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
- A \frac{d}{d\eta}\biggl\{ | |||
\eta^{-1} \cdot \sin(B-\eta) | |||
\biggr\} | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
A \biggl\{ | |||
\eta^{-2} \cdot \sin(B-\eta) | |||
+ | |||
\eta^{-1} \cdot \cos(B-\eta) | |||
\biggr\} | |||
\, ; | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~ Q = - \frac{\eta}{\phi}\frac{d \phi}{d\eta}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
- \eta\biggl[- \frac{A}{\eta} \cdot \sin(B-\eta) \biggr]^{-1} | |||
A \biggl\{ | |||
\eta^{-2} \cdot \sin(B-\eta) | |||
+ | |||
\eta^{-1} \cdot \cos(B-\eta) | |||
\biggr\} | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\eta\biggl[\frac{\eta}{\sin(B-\eta)} \biggr] | |||
\biggl\{ | |||
\eta^{-2} \cdot \sin(B-\eta) | |||
+ | |||
\eta^{-1} \cdot \cos(B-\eta) | |||
\biggr\} | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\biggl[\frac{1}{\sin(B-\eta)} \biggr] | |||
\biggl\{1 + \eta \cdot \cot(B-\eta) | |||
\biggr\} | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
Hence, the LAWE may be written as, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>0</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\frac{d^2x}{d\xi^2} + \biggl[4 - 6Q\biggr] \frac{1}{\xi}\cdot \frac{dx}{d\xi} | |||
+6\biggl[\biggl(\frac{\sigma_c^2}{6\gamma_\mathrm{g}}\biggr) \frac{\xi^2}{\theta} - \biggl(3 - \frac{4}{\gamma_\mathrm{g}}\biggr) Q\biggr]\frac{x}{\xi^2} | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
</td></tr></table> | |||
=Related Discussions= | =Related Discussions= | ||
{{ SGFfooter }} | {{ SGFfooter }} | ||
Revision as of 18:24, 27 December 2025
Main Sequence to Red Giant to Planetary Nebula (Part 2)
Part I: Background & Objective
|
Part II:
|
Part III:
|
Part IV:
|
Foundation
In an accompanying discussion, we derived the so-called,
whose solution gives eigenfunctions that describe various radial modes of oscillation in spherically symmetric, self-gravitating fluid configurations.
|
Introducing the dimensionless frequency-squared, , we can rewrite this LAWE as,
where, as a reminder, . Now, for our bipolytrope, we have found it useful to adopt the following four dimensionless variables:
This means that,
Making these substitutions, the LAWE can be rewritten as,
then, multiplying through by allows us to everywhere switch from to , namely,
|
In shorthand, we can rewrite this equation in the form,
|
|
|
|
where,
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
and,
and,
|
|
|
|
Specific Case of (nc, ne) = (5,1)
Drawing from our "Table 2" profiles, let's evaluate and for the two separate regions of bipolytrope model.
The nc = 5 Core
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also,
|
|
|
|
Hence, the LAWE becomes,
|
|
|
|
Multiplying through by gives,
|
|
|
|
|
Let's compare this with the equivalent expression presented separately, namely, The primary E-type solution for n = 5 polytropes states that,
Hence, the LAWE may be written as,
Versus above,
|
If we set and we set , this becomes,
|
|
|
|
Next, try the solution, and :
|
LAWE |
|
|
|
LAWE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ne = 1 Envelope
|
Let's compare this with the equivalent expression presented separately, namely, The equilibrium, off-center equilibrium solution for n = 1 polytropes states that,
Hence, the LAWE may be written as,
|
Related Discussions
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |