SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/RedGiantToPN/Pt2: Difference between revisions
| Line 855: | Line 855: | ||
</td></tr></table> | </td></tr></table> | ||
Try | ====First Try==== | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | ||
| Line 974: | Line 975: | ||
<font color="red">Close, but no cigar!</font> | <font color="red">Close, but no cigar!</font> | ||
====Second Try==== | |||
Next, let's set <math>\sigma_c^2 = 0</math> but let's leave <math>\gamma_\mathrm{g}</math> unspecified: | Next, let's set <math>\sigma_c^2 = 0</math> but let's leave <math>\gamma_\mathrm{g}</math> unspecified: | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | ||
| Line 1,061: | Line 1,063: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
This means that the envelope is incompressible. | This means that the envelope is incompressible. | ||
====Third Try=== | |||
=Related Discussions= | =Related Discussions= | ||
{{ SGFfooter }} | {{ SGFfooter }} | ||
Revision as of 13:26, 28 December 2025
Main Sequence to Red Giant to Planetary Nebula (Part 2)
Part I: Background & Objective
|
Part II:
|
Part III:
|
Part IV:
|
Foundation
In an accompanying discussion, we derived the so-called,
whose solution gives eigenfunctions that describe various radial modes of oscillation in spherically symmetric, self-gravitating fluid configurations.
|
Introducing the dimensionless frequency-squared, , we can rewrite this LAWE as,
where, as a reminder, . Now, for our bipolytrope, we have found it useful to adopt the following four dimensionless variables:
This means that,
Making these substitutions, the LAWE can be rewritten as,
then, multiplying through by allows us to everywhere switch from to , namely,
|
In shorthand, we can rewrite this equation in the form,
|
|
|
|
where,
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
and,
and,
|
|
|
|
Specific Case of (nc, ne) = (5,1)
Drawing from our "Table 2" profiles, let's evaluate and for the two separate regions of bipolytrope model.
The nc = 5 Core
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also,
|
|
|
|
Hence, the LAWE becomes,
|
|
|
|
Multiplying through by gives,
|
|
|
|
|
Let's compare this with the equivalent expression presented separately, namely, The primary E-type solution for n = 5 polytropes states that,
Hence, the LAWE may be written as,
Versus above,
|
If we set and we set , this becomes,
|
|
|
|
Next, try the solution, and :
|
LAWE |
|
|
|
LAWE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ne = 1 Envelope
|
Let's compare this with the equivalent expression presented separately, namely, The equilibrium, off-center equilibrium solution for n = 1 polytropes states that,
Hence, the LAWE may be written as,
|
First Try
|
|
|
and |
in which case,
|
LAWE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now set and set :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We see that the complexity of the LAWE reduces substantially if we set ; specifically, this choice gives,
|
|
|
|
Close, but no cigar!
Second Try
Next, let's set but let's leave unspecified:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first term goes to zero if we set ; then, in order for the second term to go to zero, we need …
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This means that the envelope is incompressible.
=Third Try
Related Discussions
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |