ParabolicDensity/GravPot: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 344: | Line 344: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
This matches the expression for the gravitational potential inside (and on the surface) of a uniform-density sphere, as we have derived in an [[SSC/Structure/UniformDensity#UniformSpherePotential|accompanying chapter]]. | This matches the expression for the gravitational potential inside (and on the surface) of a uniform-density sphere, as we have derived in an [[SSC/Structure/UniformDensity#UniformSpherePotential|accompanying chapter]]. | ||
===Parabolic Density Distribution=== | |||
<table border="1" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="10"> | |||
<tr><td align="center">SUMMARY — copied from [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/Challenges#Trial_.232|accompanying, ''Trial #2'' Discussion]]</td></tr> | |||
<tr><td align="left"> | |||
After studying the relevant sections of both [<b>[[Appendix/References#EFE|<font color="red">EFE</font>]]</b>] and [<b>[[Appendix/References#BT87|<font color="red">BT87</font>]]</b>] — this is an example of a heterogeneous density distribution whose gravitational potential has an analytic prescription. As is discussed in a [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/HomogeneousEllipsoids#Inhomogeneous_Ellipsoids_Leading_to_Ferrers_Potentials| separate chapter]], the potential that it generates is sometimes referred to as a ''Ferrers'' potential, for the exponent, n = 1. | |||
In our [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/HomogeneousEllipsoids#GravFor1|accompanying discussion]] we find that, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>\frac{ \Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\mathbf{x})}{(-\pi G\rho_c)}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\frac{1}{2} I_\mathrm{BT} a_1^2 | |||
- \biggl(A_1 x^2 + A_2 y^2 +A_3 z^2 \biggr) | |||
+ \biggl( A_{12} x^2y^2 + A_{13} x^2z^2 + A_{23} y^2z^2\biggr) | |||
+ \frac{1}{6} \biggl(3A_{11}x^4 + 3A_{22}y^4 + 3A_{33}z^4 \biggr) | |||
\, , | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
where, | |||
<table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="10" width="80%"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="center" width="50%"> | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr><td align="center" colspan="3">for <math>i \ne j</math></td></tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>A_{ij}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>\equiv</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>-\frac{A_i-A_j}{(a_i^2 - a_j^2)} </math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr><td align="center" colspan="3">[ [[Appendix/References#EFE|EFE]], <font color="#00CC00">§21, Eq. (107)</font> ]</td></tr> | |||
</table> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center" width="50%"> | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr><td align="center" colspan="3">for <math>i = j</math></td></tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>2A_{ii} + \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 A_{i\ell}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>\frac{2}{a_i} </math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr><td align="center" colspan="3">[ [[Appendix/References#EFE|EFE]], <font color="#00CC00">§21, Eq. (109)</font> ]</td></tr> | |||
</table> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
More specifically, in the three cases where the indices, <math>i=j</math>, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>3A_{11}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\frac{2}{a_1^2} - (A_{12} + A_{13}) \, , | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>3A_{22}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\frac{2}{a_2^2} - (A_{21} + A_{23}) \, , | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>3A_{33}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\frac{2}{a_3^2} - (A_{31} + A_{32}) \, . | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
</td></tr></table> | |||
=See Also= | =See Also= | ||
{{ SGFfooter }} | {{ SGFfooter }} | ||
Revision as of 19:21, 27 July 2024
Parabolic Density Distribution
Part I: Gravitational Potential
|
Part II: Spherical Structures
|
Part III: Axisymmetric Equilibrium Structures
|
Part IV: Triaxial Equilibrium Structures (Exploration)
|
Gravitational Potential
In an accompanying chapter titled, Properties of Homogeneous Ellipsoids (1), we have shown how analytic expressions may be derived for the gravitational potential inside of uniform-density ellipsoids. In that discussion, we largely followed the derivations of [EFE]. In the latter part of the nineteenth-century, 📚 N. M. Ferrers (1877, Quart. J. Pure Appl. Math., Vol. 14, pp. 1 - 22) showed that very similar analytic expressions can be derived for ellipsoids that have certain inhomogeneous mass distributions. Here we specifically discuss the case of configurations that exhibit concentric ellipsoidal iso-density surfaces of the form,
|
|
= |
|
that is, configurations with parabolic density distributions. Much of our presentation, here, is drawn from our separate, detailed description of what we will refer to as Ferrers potential.
Uniform-Density Reminders
We begin by reminding the reader that, for a uniform-density configuration, the "interior" potential will be given by the expression,
|
|
= |
|
As we have shown in a separate presentation, if the three principal axes of the configuration are unequal in length and related to one another such that , the appropriate expressions for the four leading coefficients are,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[EFE], Chapter 3, Eqs. (33), (34) & (35)
As can readily be demonstrated, this scalar potential satisfies the differential form of the
As we have also demonstrated, if the longest axis, , and the intermediate axis, , of the ellipsoid are equal to one another, then an equatorial cross-section of the object presents a circle of radius and the object is referred to as an oblate spheroid. For homogeneous oblate spheroids, evaluation of the integrals defining and gives,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
where the eccentricity,
Note the following, separately derived limits:
|
Table 1: Limiting Values |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence, for a uniform-density sphere ,
|
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
|
J. B. Tatum (2021) Celestial Mechanics class notes (UVic), §5.8.9, p. 36, Eq. (5.8.23) |
||
This matches the expression for the gravitational potential inside (and on the surface) of a uniform-density sphere, as we have derived in an accompanying chapter.
Parabolic Density Distribution
| SUMMARY — copied from accompanying, Trial #2 Discussion | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
After studying the relevant sections of both [EFE] and [BT87] — this is an example of a heterogeneous density distribution whose gravitational potential has an analytic prescription. As is discussed in a separate chapter, the potential that it generates is sometimes referred to as a Ferrers potential, for the exponent, n = 1. In our accompanying discussion we find that,
where,
More specifically, in the three cases where the indices, ,
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See Also
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |