SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/RedGiantToPN/TryAgain: Difference between revisions
Created page with "__FORCETOC__ =BiPolytrope with n<sub>c</sub> = 5 and n<sub>e</sub> = 1 (Pt 1)= =Related Discussions= * Polytropes emdeded in an external medium * Constructing BiPolytropes * Bonnor-Ebert spheres ** [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonnor-Ebert_mass Bonnor-Ebert Mass] according to Wikipedia ** <font c..." |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__FORCETOC__ | __FORCETOC__ | ||
= | =BiPolytropes with n<sub>c</sub> = 5 and n<sub>e</sub> = 1= | ||
==Review== | |||
(October 30, 2026): A significant portion of the information that we have gathered regarding the stability of (n<sub>c</sub>, n<sub>e</sub>) = (5, 1) bipolytropes is [[SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/51Models|presented on the following page]] ... | |||
The most important result is associated with the case of <math>\mu_e/\mu_c = 1</math>. With our first numerical integration of the LAWE, we found that the interface location for which <math>\sigma_c^2 = 0</math> is <math>\xi = 1.6686460157</math>; a separate numerical integration gave the result: <font color="darkgreen"><math>\xi_i = 1.6639103365</math></font>. | |||
Separately, we asked where along the equilibrium sequence we will find that <math>d M_\mathrm{tot}/d\xi = 0</math>. For the case of unity molecular-weight ratio, we found analytically that <math>\xi_i = 1.6684629814</math>. These are virtually identical coordinate positions; it seems likely that they should be identically the same. | |||
=See Also= | |||
{{ SGFfooter }} | {{ SGFfooter }} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:33, 30 October 2026
BiPolytropes with nc = 5 and ne = 1[edit]
Review[edit]
(October 30, 2026): A significant portion of the information that we have gathered regarding the stability of (nc, ne) = (5, 1) bipolytropes is presented on the following page ...
The most important result is associated with the case of . With our first numerical integration of the LAWE, we found that the interface location for which is ; a separate numerical integration gave the result: .
Separately, we asked where along the equilibrium sequence we will find that . For the case of unity molecular-weight ratio, we found analytically that . These are virtually identical coordinate positions; it seems likely that they should be identically the same.
See Also[edit]
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |