Appendix/Ramblings/PowerSeriesExpressions: Difference between revisions
| (9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 547: | Line 547: | ||
</td></tr></table> | </td></tr></table> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
See also: | |||
* Equation (62) from §5 in Chapter IV of [[Appendix/References#C67|C67]]. | |||
NOTE: For cylindrically symmetric, rather than spherically symmetric, configurations, the analogous power-series expression appears as equation (15) in the article by [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1964ApJ...140.1056O J. P. Ostriker (1964, ApJ, 140, 1056)] titled, ''The Equilibrium of Polytropic and Isothermal Cylinders''. | NOTE: For cylindrically symmetric, rather than spherically symmetric, configurations, the analogous power-series expression appears as equation (15) in the article by [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1964ApJ...140.1056O J. P. Ostriker (1964, ApJ, 140, 1056)] titled, ''The Equilibrium of Polytropic and Isothermal Cylinders''. | ||
| Line 2,653: | Line 2,658: | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
1 - \frac{\xi^2}{30} + \frac{\xi^4}{1260} + \cdots | 1 - \frac{\xi^2}{30} + \frac{\xi^4}{1260} + \cdots ~~~~~\Rightarrow ~~ \frac{2}{3} x_Y = \frac{2}{3} - \frac{\xi^2}{45} + \frac{\xi^4}{1890} + \cdots | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
| Line 2,662: | Line 2,667: | ||
</td></tr></table> | </td></tr></table> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<table border="1" align="center" width="80%" cellpadding="5"><tr><td align="left"> | <table border="1" align="center" width="80%" cellpadding="5"><tr><td align="left"> | ||
<font color="red"> | <font color="red"> | ||
This is a derivation check ...</font> (Numerical values in parentheses assume <math>\xi = 0.056</math>, or <font color="orange">0.107</font>) | This is a derivation check ...</font> (Numerical values in parentheses assume <math>\xi = 0.056</math>, or <font color="orange">0.107</font>, or <font color="green">0.322</font>) | ||
</font> | </font> | ||
| Line 2,691: | Line 2,697: | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\frac{\xi^2}{6} - \frac{\xi^4}{120} + \frac{\xi^6}{1890} - \frac{61 \xi^8}{1,632,960} + \cdots | \frac{\xi^2}{6} - \frac{\xi^4}{120} + \frac{\xi^6}{1890} - \frac{61 \xi^8}{1,632,960} + \cdots | ||
</math> (5.22585 × 10<sup>-4</sup>, or <font color="orange">1.907075 × 10<sup>-03</sup></font>)<math>~~~\Rightarrow ~~~ e^\psi =</math>(1.000522, or <font color="orange">1.001908895</font>) | </math> (5.22585 × 10<sup>-4</sup>, or <font color="orange">1.907075 × 10<sup>-03</sup></font>, or <font color="green">0.017191666</font>)<math>~~~\Rightarrow ~~~ e^\psi =</math>(1.000522, or <font color="orange">1.001908895</font>, or <font color="green">1.017340293</font>) | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
| Line 2,701: | Line 2,707: | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\frac{1}{3} - \frac{\xi^2}{30} + \frac{6\xi^4}{1890} - \frac{8\cdot 61 \xi^6}{1,632,960} + \cdots | \frac{1}{3} - \frac{\xi^2}{30} + \frac{6\xi^4}{1890} - \frac{8\cdot 61 \xi^6}{1,632,960} + \cdots | ||
</math> (3.33229× 10<sup>-1</sup>, or <font color="orange">0.332952116</font>) | </math> (3.33229× 10<sup>-1</sup>, or <font color="orange">0.332952116</font>, or <font color="green">0.329910995</font>) | ||
<math>~~~\Rightarrow ~~~ x_Y = </math>(1 - 0.465010 = 0.34990) | <math>~~~\Rightarrow ~~~ x_Y = </math>(1 - 0.465010 = 0.34990) | ||
<math>(1-x_Y) = </math> (xxx, or <font color="orange">0.333587080</font>) | <math>(1-x_Y) = </math> (xxx, or <font color="orange">0.333587080</font>, or <font color="green">0.335631748</font>) | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
| Line 2,790: | Line 2,796: | ||
+ \frac{\xi^8}{2^6\cdot 3^4 \cdot 5^2 \cdot 7}\biggl[2^5\cdot 5 + 3^2\cdot 7 \biggr] | + \frac{\xi^8}{2^6\cdot 3^4 \cdot 5^2 \cdot 7}\biggl[2^5\cdot 5 + 3^2\cdot 7 \biggr] | ||
+\mathcal{O}(\xi^{10}) | +\mathcal{O}(\xi^{10}) | ||
</math> (2.73095 × 10<sup>-07</sup>, or <font color="orange">3.636931 × 10<sup>-06</sup></font> | </math> (2.73095 × 10<sup>-07</sup>, or <font color="orange">3.636931 × 10<sup>-06</sup></font>, or <font color="green">2.955536 × 10<sup>-04</sup></font> | ||
vs. from above 2.73095 × 10<sup>-7</sup>, or <font color="orange">3.636935 × 10<sup>-06</sup></font> ) | vs. from above 2.73095 × 10<sup>-7</sup>, or <font color="orange">3.636935 × 10<sup>-06</sup></font> , or <font color="green">2.955533 × 10<sup>-04</sup></font>) | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
| Line 2,856: | Line 2,862: | ||
\frac{\xi^8}{2^5\cdot 3^2 \cdot 5} | \frac{\xi^8}{2^5\cdot 3^2 \cdot 5} | ||
+\mathcal{O}(\xi^{10}) | +\mathcal{O}(\xi^{10}) | ||
</math> (1.42715 × 10<sup>-10</sup> , or <font color="orange">6.935893 × 10<sup>-09</sup></font> | </math> (1.42715 × 10<sup>-10</sup> , or <font color="orange">6.935893 × 10<sup>-09</sup></font>, or <font color="green">5.080120 × 10<sup>-06</sup></font> | ||
vs. from above 1.42715 × 10<sup>-10</sup> , or <font color="orange">6.935909 × 10<sup>-09</sup></font> ) | vs. from above 1.42715 × 10<sup>-10</sup> , or <font color="orange">6.935909 × 10<sup>-09</sup></font>, or <font color="green">5.081054 × 10<sup>-06</sup></font> ) | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
| Line 2,872: | Line 2,878: | ||
\frac{\xi^8}{2^4 \cdot 3^4} | \frac{\xi^8}{2^4 \cdot 3^4} | ||
+\mathcal{O}(\xi^{10}) | +\mathcal{O}(\xi^{10}) | ||
</math> (7.46276 × 10<sup>-14</sup> , or <font color="orange">1.325760 × 10<sup>-11</sup></font> | </math> (7.46276 × 10<sup>-14</sup> , or <font color="orange">1.325760 × 10<sup>-11</sup></font>, or <font color="green">8.917476 × 10<sup>-08</sup></font> | ||
vs. from above 7.45808 × 10<sup>-14</sup> , or <font color="orange">1.322730 × 10<sup>-11</sup></font> ) | vs. from above 7.45808 × 10<sup>-14</sup> , or <font color="orange">1.322730 × 10<sup>-11</sup></font>, or <font color="green">8.735179 × 10<sup>-08</sup></font>) | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
| Line 2,892: | Line 2,898: | ||
1 + \psi + \frac{\psi^2}{2!} + \frac{\psi^3}{3!} + \frac{\psi^4}{4!} + \cdots | 1 + \psi + \frac{\psi^2}{2!} + \frac{\psi^3}{3!} + \frac{\psi^4}{4!} + \cdots | ||
</math> (1 + 5.227213 × 10<sup>-4</sup> | </math> (1 + 5.227213 × 10<sup>-4</sup> | ||
, or <font color="orange">1+1.908894 × 10<sup>-03</sup></font> | , or <font color="orange">1+1.908894 × 10<sup>-03</sup></font>, or <font color="green">1.017340</font> | ||
vs. from above 1.000522 × 10<sup>0</sup> , or <font color="orange">1+1.908895 × 10<sup>-03</sup></font>) | vs. from above 1.000522 × 10<sup>0</sup> , or <font color="orange">1+1.908895 × 10<sup>-03</sup></font>, or <font color="green">1.017340293</font>) | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
| Line 3,031: | Line 3,037: | ||
\frac{-4}{45360} | \frac{-4}{45360} | ||
\biggr] | \biggr] | ||
</math> (1 + 5.22721 × 10<sup>-4</sup>, or <font color="orange">1 + 1.908894 × 10<sup>-03</sup></font>) | </math> (1 + 5.22721 × 10<sup>-4</sup>, or <font color="orange">1 + 1.908894 × 10<sup>-03</sup></font>, or <font color="green">1.017340</font>) | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
| Line 3,048: | Line 3,054: | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\overbrace{\biggl[- \frac{1}{3} + \frac{\xi^2}{2\cdot 3\cdot 5} - \frac{\xi^4}{3^2 \cdot 5\cdot 7} + \frac{61 \xi^6}{ 2^3 \cdot 3^6\cdot 5\cdot 7}\biggr]}^{-0.33295212} | \overbrace{\biggl[- \frac{1}{3} + \frac{\xi^2}{2\cdot 3\cdot 5} - \frac{\xi^4}{3^2 \cdot 5\cdot 7} + \frac{61 \xi^6}{ 2^3 \cdot 3^6\cdot 5\cdot 7}\biggr]}^{-0.33295212 ~~ or ~~ - 0.329910995} | ||
\times \underbrace{\biggl\{ | \times \underbrace{\biggl\{ | ||
1 + \frac{\xi^2}{6} | 1 + \frac{\xi^2}{6} | ||
| Line 3,056: | Line 3,062: | ||
\frac{1}{2^2\cdot 3^4\cdot 5\cdot 7} | \frac{1}{2^2\cdot 3^4\cdot 5\cdot 7} | ||
\biggr] | \biggr] | ||
\biggr\}}_{1. | \biggr\}}_{1.001908167 ~ or ~ 1.017340} | ||
\approx </math> <font color="orange">-0. | \approx </math> <font color="orange">-0.333587444</font>, or <font color="green">-0.3356316</font> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
| Line 3,194: | Line 3,200: | ||
+ \xi^4\biggl[-\frac{1}{2^2 \cdot 3^3\cdot 5} + \frac{1}{2^2\cdot 3^2\cdot 5} -\frac{1}{3^2 \cdot 5\cdot 7} \biggr] | + \xi^4\biggl[-\frac{1}{2^2 \cdot 3^3\cdot 5} + \frac{1}{2^2\cdot 3^2\cdot 5} -\frac{1}{3^2 \cdot 5\cdot 7} \biggr] | ||
+ \xi^6 \biggl[\frac{1}{2^2\cdot 3^5\cdot 5\cdot 7} + \frac{1}{2^3 \cdot 3^3\cdot 5^2} + \frac{61 }{2^3 \cdot 3^5 \cdot 5 \cdot 7}\biggr] | + \xi^6 \biggl[\frac{1}{2^2\cdot 3^5\cdot 5\cdot 7} + \frac{1}{2^3 \cdot 3^3\cdot 5^2} + \frac{61 }{2^3 \cdot 3^5 \cdot 5 \cdot 7}\biggr] | ||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>\approx</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
- \frac{1}{3} + \xi^2\biggl[- \frac{5}{2\cdot 3^2 \cdot 5} + \frac{3}{2\cdot 3^2\cdot 5} \biggr] | |||
+ \xi^4\biggl[-\frac{7}{2^2 \cdot 3^3\cdot 5 \cdot 7} + \frac{3\cdot 7}{2^2\cdot 3^3\cdot 5 \cdot 7} -\frac{2^2\cdot 3}{2^2\cdot 3^3 \cdot 5\cdot 7} \biggr] | |||
+ \xi^6 \biggl[\frac{2\cdot 5}{2^3\cdot 3^5\cdot 5^2\cdot 7} + \frac{3^2 \cdot 7}{2^3 \cdot 3^5 \cdot 5^2} | |||
+ \frac{5\cdot 61 }{2^3 \cdot 3^5 \cdot 5^2 \cdot 7}\biggr] | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>\approx</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
- \frac{1}{3} - \xi^2\biggl[\frac{1}{3^2 \cdot 5} \biggr] | |||
+ \xi^4\biggl[ \frac{1}{2 \cdot 3^3\cdot 5 \cdot 7} \biggr] | |||
+ \xi^6 \biggl[\frac{1}{2^2\cdot 3^2\cdot 5^2} \biggr] | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>\approx</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
- \frac{1}{3} - \biggl[\frac{\xi^2}{45} \biggr] | |||
+ \biggl[ \frac{\xi^4}{1890} \biggr] | |||
+ \biggl[\frac{\xi^6}{900} \biggr] | |||
</math> (<font color="orange">-0.333587685</font>, or <font color="green">-0.3356304</font>) | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~ x_Y</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>\approx</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\frac{2}{3} - \biggl[\frac{\xi^2}{45} \biggr] | |||
+ \biggl[ \frac{\xi^4}{1890} \biggr] | |||
+ \biggl[\frac{\xi^6}{900} \biggr] | |||
</math> | </math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
<b><font color="red">YES!!</font></b> | |||
</td></tr></table> | </td></tr></table> | ||
Latest revision as of 18:44, 15 October 2026
Approximate Power-Series Expressions[edit]
Broadly Used Mathematical Expressions (shown here without proof)[edit]
Binomial[edit]
|
|
|
for |
|
LaTeX mathematical expressions cut-and-pasted directly from
|
|||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
As a primary point of reference, note that according to §1.2 of NIST's Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, the binomial theorem states that,
where, for nonnegative integer values of and and , the notation,
Our Example: Setting gives,
|
Note, for example, that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See also:
Exponential[edit]
|
|
|
|
Expressions with Astrophysical Relevance[edit]
Polytropic Lane-Emden Function[edit]
Power-Series Derivation[edit]
We seek a power-series expression for the polytropic, Lane-Emden function, — expanded about the coordinate center, — that approximately satisfies the Lane-Emden equation,
A general power-series should be of the form,
|
|
|
|
First derivative:
|
|
|
|
Left-hand-side of Lane-Emden equation:
|
|
|
|
Right-hand-side of Lane-Emden equation (adopt the normalization, , then use the binomial theorem recursively):
|
|
|
|
where,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First approximation: Assume that , in which case the LHS contains terms only up through . This means that we must ignore all terms on the RHS that are of higher order than ; that is,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expressions for the various coefficients can now be determined by equating terms on the LHS and RHS that have like powers of . Remembering to include a negative sign on the RHS, we find:
| Term | LHS | RHS | Implication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By including higher and higher order terms in the series expansion for , and proceeding along the same line of deductive reasoning, one finds:
- Expressions for the four coefficients, , remain unchanged.
- The coefficient is zero for all other terms that contain odd powers of ; specifically, for example, .
- The coefficients of and are, respectively,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In summary, the desired, approximate power-series expression for the polytropic Lane-Emden function is:
| For Spherically Symmetric Configurations | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
See also:
- Equation (62) from §5 in Chapter IV of C67.
NOTE: For cylindrically symmetric, rather than spherically symmetric, configurations, the analogous power-series expression appears as equation (15) in the article by J. P. Ostriker (1964, ApJ, 140, 1056) titled, The Equilibrium of Polytropic and Isothermal Cylinders.
Theta-Function Examples[edit]
When , all of the terms in the power-series expression higher than quadratic go to zero. As a result, we see that
|
|
|
|
When , the first few terms in the power-series expression are,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
which is consistent with the power-series expression for .
When , the first few terms in the power-series expression are,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This should be compared with the known analytic solution, which is
|
|
|
|
From the binomial theorem, we start with,
|
|
|
|
then set and to obtain:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QED
Isothermal Lane-Emden Function[edit]
Derivation[edit]
Here we seek a power-series expression for the isothermal, Lane-Emden function — expanded about the coordinate center — that approximately satisfies the isothermal Lane-Emden equation; making the variable substitution (sorry for the unnecessary complication!), , the governing ODE is,
|
|
|
|
A general power-series should be of the form,
|
|
|
|
Derivatives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Put together, then, the left-hand-side of the isothermal Lane-Emden equation becomes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing on the above power-series expression for an exponential function, and adopting the convention that , the right-hand-side becomes,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expressions for the various coefficients can now be determined by equating terms on the LHS and RHS that have like powers of . Beginning with the highest order terms, we initially find,
| Term | LHS | RHS | Implication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With this initial set of coefficient values in hand, we can rewrite (and significantly simplify) our approximate expression for the RHS, namely,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing, then, with equating terms with like powers on both sides of the equation, we find,
| Term | LHS | RHS | Implication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Result:
| For Spherically Symmetric Configurations | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
See also:
- Equation (377) from §22 in Chapter IV of C67.
NOTE: For cylindrically symmetric, rather than spherically symmetric, configurations, an analytic expression for the function, , is presented as equation (56) in a paper by J. P. Ostriker (1964, ApJ, 140, 1056) titled, The Equilibrium of Polytropic and Isothermal Cylinders.
For Later Use[edit]
We have just determined that,
|
|
|
|
where,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That is to say,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Therefore, also,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We also have shown that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Therefore, together we have,
|
|
|
|
Displacement Function for Polytropic LAWE[edit]
The LAWE for polytropic spheres may be written as,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where, is the polytropic Lane-Emden function describing the configuration's unperturbed radial density distribution, and , , and are constants. Here we seek a power-series expression for the displacement function, , expanded about the center of the configuration, that approximately satisfies this LAWE.
First we note that, near the center, an accurate power-series expression for the polytropic Lane-Emden function is,
|
|
|
|
Hence,
|
|
|
|
Therefore, near the center of the configuration, the LAWE may be written as,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where, and, for present purposes, we have kept terms in the series no higher than .
|
This is a derivation check ...
Try
in which case,
|
Displacement Finite at Center[edit]
Let's adopt a power-series expression for the displacement function of a form that is finite at the center of the configuration, namely,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substituting these expressions into the LAWE gives,
|
|
|
|
Expressions for the various coefficients can now be determined by equating terms on the LHS and RHS that have like powers of .
| Term | LHS | RHS | Implication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: On 9/10/2026, we realized that the first term in the numerator of the expression for the coefficient, , should be instead of just . |
|||
In summary, the desired, approximate power-series expression for the polytropic displacement function is:
|
Polytropic Displacement-Function Examples[edit]
We will only consider situations in which and , in which case, and .
When and we have,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compare this result with the expression for found in an an accompanying "related thoughts" paragraph.
When and we have,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compare this result with the expression for found in an an accompanying "related thoughts" paragraph.
When and we have,
|
|
|
|
Sterne (1937) derived analytic expressions for the eigenvectors that describe radial oscillations in uniform-density spheres. The fundamental (j = 0) mode exhibits homologous expansion/contraction, that is to say,
|
|
|
|
But in his analysis, the accompanying value of is zero; and the accompanying (square of the) dimensionless eigenfrequency is . We cannot adopt the requirement that because .
Displacement Function for Isothermal LAWE[edit]
The LAWE for isothermal spheres may be written as,
|
|
|
|
where, is the isothermal Lane-Emden function describing the configuration's unperturbed radial density distribution, and , , and are constants. Here we seek a power-series expression for the displacement function, , expanded about the center of the configuration, that approximately satisfies this LAWE.
First we note that, near the center, an accurate power-series expression for the isothermal Lane-Emden function is,
|
|
|
|
Hence,
|
|
|
|
Therefore, near the center of the configuration, the LAWE may be written as,
|
|
|
|
Let's now adopt a power-series expression for the displacement function of the form [modified leading term on 9/29/2026],
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and,
|
|
|
|
Substituting these expressions into the LAWE gives,
|
|
|
|
Keeping terms only up through leads to the following simplification:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where,
Finally, balancing terms of like powers on both sides of the equation leads us to conclude the following:
| Term | LHS | RHS | Implication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In summary, the desired, approximate power-series expression for the isothermal displacement function is:
Then, in the particular case where and — which implies that and — we have,
|
|
This is a derivation check ... (Numerical values in parentheses assume , or 0.107, or 0.322) As was discovered by Yabushita, the analytically prescribed isothermal displacement function is,
and that,
and that,
and that,
we appreciate that the exponential function gives,
As a result, the approximate expression for is (also see above),
YES!! |
Maclaurin Spheroid Index Symbols[edit]
In our accompanying discussion of the equilibrium properties of models along the Maclaurin spheroid sequence, we find the "Index Symbols" expressions,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where,
|
|
|
(always positive). |
Our aim, here, is to derive a power-series expression for these two index symbols (a) in the case of nearly spherical configurations , and (b) in the case of an infinitesimally thin disk .
Nearly Spherical Configurations[edit]
On p. 457 of [CRC], we find that,
|
|
|
for, |
Also, from the above binomial-theorem expression, we have,
|
|
|
for |
|
|
|
|
So we can write,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This looks okay, in the sense that .
Infinitesimally Thin Axisymmetric Disk[edit]
As — that is, in the case of an infinitesimally thin, axisymmetric disk — the preferred small parameter is,
|
|
|
|
Recognizing as well that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the expressions for the pair of relevant index symbols may be rewritten as,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pulling again from p. 457 of [CRC], we find that,
|
|
|
for, |
|
LAGNIAPPE:
According to the above binomial-theorem expression, we find for ,
Hence,
(continue expression simplification)
|
Referring again to the above binomial-theorem expression, we find for ,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We therefore can write,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once again from the binomial theorem,
|
|
|
|
which gives us,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice that, to the highest order retained in these expressions, we find as expected that, .
Frequency (temporary)[edit]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taylor Series (Hunter77)[edit]
First (Unsuccessful) Try[edit]
First:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that, replacing the term with the expression derived in the Second step, below, gives,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then, replacing the term with the expression derived in the Third step, below, gives,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now, replacing the term with the expression derived in the Third step, below, gives,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And, finally:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Result:
|
Definitely WRONG! |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
When I used an Excel spreadsheet to test this out against a parabola, the integration quickly became wildly unstable, strongly suggesting that there is an error in the derivation. My first attempt to uncover this error produced a new coefficient on the , namely,
|
Somewhat Improved |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Although it showed improvement, this expression still blows up. So I have not bothered to revise the original (definitely WRONG!) derivation. Instead, let's start all over and approach it with a more gradual derivation.
Second Try[edit]
We will work from the following foundation expression in which is the variable that we desire to evaluate, and the "known" quantities are: , , , , and .
|
|
|
|
Let's use similar Taylor-series expansions for , , etc. in order to eliminate the term, the term, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This expression works very well for a parabola.
Second:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This also allows us to improve the expression for the term, as initially derived in the "First" subsection, above. Namely,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence, an improved expression for is,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, then:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |