SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/RedGiantToPN/Pt3: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
+ (n+1) \biggl[ - \alpha Q\biggr] | + (n+1) \biggl[ - \alpha Q\biggr] | ||
~\biggr\} \eta^{-m - 2} | ~\biggr\} \eta^{-m - 2} | ||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\biggl\{~ | |||
m(m+1) -4m | |||
+\biggl[ m(n+1) \biggr] Q | |||
- \biggl[ \alpha(n+1) \biggr]Q | |||
~\biggr\} \eta^{-m - 2} | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\biggl\{~ | |||
m^2 - 3m | |||
+ (n+1)( m - \alpha ) Q | |||
~\biggr\} \eta^{-m - 2} | |||
\, . | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
The dependence on <math>Q</math> can be eliminated if we set <math>m = \alpha</math>; in which case we obtain, | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>C_0</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"><math>=</math></td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math> | |||
\biggl\{~ | |||
\alpha^2 - 3\alpha | |||
~\biggr\} \eta^{-m - 2} | |||
\, . | |||
</math> | </math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:13, 6 January 2026
Main Sequence to Red Giant to Planetary Nebula (Part 3)[edit]
Part I: Background & Objective
|
Part II:
|
Yabushita68-Motivated Analysis
|
Part IV:
|
Yabushita68-Motivated Analysis[edit]
In an accompanying discussion, we derived the so-called,
Motivated by the derivation presented by 📚 S. Yabushita (1968, MNRAS, Vol. 140, pp. 109 - 120), let's now insert an integration constant, , into this 2nd-order ODE to obtain what we henceforth will refer to as the,
|
Yabushita68-Motivated Polytropic LAWE |
|
|
After setting , let's guess an eigenfunction of the form,
|
|
|
and |
in which case we find that,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The dependence on can be eliminated if we set ; in which case we obtain,
|
|
|
Related Discussions[edit]
|
Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS | |