ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/FerrersPotential: Difference between revisions

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
|}
|}


In an [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/HomogeneousEllipsoids|accompanying chapter]] titled, ''Properties of Homogeneous Ellipsoids (1),'' we have shown how analytic expressions may be derived for the gravitational potential inside of uniform-density ellipsoids.  In that discussion, we largely followed the derivations of [[Appendix/References#EFE|EFE]].  In the latter part of the nineteenth-century, {{ Ferrers1877full }} showed that very similar analytic expressions can be derived for ellipsoids that have certain, specific inhomogeneous mass distributions.  Here we specifically discuss the case of configurations that exhibit concentric ellipsoidal iso-density surfaces of the form,
In an [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/HomogeneousEllipsoids|accompanying chapter]] titled, ''Properties of Homogeneous Ellipsoids (1),'' we have shown how analytic expressions may be derived for the gravitational potential inside of uniform-density ellipsoids.  In that discussion, we largely followed the derivations of [<b>[[Appendix/References#EFE|<font color="red">EFE</font>]]</b>].  In the latter part of the nineteenth-century, {{ Ferrers1877full }} showed that very similar analytic expressions can be derived for ellipsoids that have certain, specific inhomogeneous mass distributions.  Here we specifically discuss the case of configurations that exhibit concentric ellipsoidal iso-density surfaces of the form,


<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
Line 15: Line 15:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
=
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>\rho_c \biggl[ 1 -  \biggl( \frac{x^2}{a_1^2} + \frac{y^2}{a_2^2} + \frac{z^2}{a_3^2}\biggr) \biggr] \, .
<math>\rho_c \biggl[ 1 -  \biggl( \frac{x^2}{a_1^2} + \frac{y^2}{a_2^2} + \frac{z^2}{a_3^2}\biggr) \biggr] \, .</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 28: Line 27:


<tr><td align="left">
<tr><td align="left">
After studying the relevant sections of both [[Appendix/References#EFE|EFE]] and [[Appendix/References#BT87|BT87]] &#8212; this is an example of a heterogeneous density distribution whose gravitational potential has an analytic prescription.  As is discussed in a [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/HomogeneousEllipsoids#Inhomogeneous_Ellipsoids_Leading_to_Ferrers_Potentials| separate chapter]], the potential that it generates is sometimes referred to as a ''Ferrers'' potential, for the exponent, n = 1.
After studying the relevant sections of both [<b>[[Appendix/References#EFE|<font color="red">EFE</font>]]</b>] and [<b>[[Appendix/References#BT87|<font color="red">BT87</font>]]</b>] &#8212; this is an example of a heterogeneous density distribution whose gravitational potential has an analytic prescription.  As is discussed in a [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/HomogeneousEllipsoids#Inhomogeneous_Ellipsoids_Leading_to_Ferrers_Potentials| separate chapter]], the potential that it generates is sometimes referred to as a ''Ferrers'' potential, for the exponent, n = 1.


In our [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/HomogeneousEllipsoids#GravFor1|accompanying discussion]] we find that,
In our [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/HomogeneousEllipsoids#GravFor1|accompanying discussion]] we find that,
Line 35: Line 34:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>\frac{ \Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\bold{x})}{(-\pi G\rho_c)} </math>
<math>\frac{ \Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\mathbf{x})}{(-\pi G\rho_c)}</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center"><math>=</math> </td>
   <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
Line 84: Line 83:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>\frac{2}{a_i} </math>
<math>\frac{2}{a_i^2} </math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 158: Line 157:
</table>
</table>


Following &sect;2.3.2 (beginning on p. 60) of [[Appendix/References#BT87|BT87]], let's examine ''inhomogeneous'' configurations whose isodensity surfaces (including the surface, itself) are defined by triaxial ellipsoids on which the Cartesian coordinates <math>~(x_1, x_2, x_3)</math> satisfy the condition that,
Following &sect;2.3.2 (beginning on p. 60) of [<b>[[Appendix/References#BT87|<font color="red">BT87</font>]]</b>], let's examine ''inhomogeneous'' configurations whose isodensity surfaces (including the surface, itself) are defined by triaxial ellipsoids on which the Cartesian coordinates <math>(x_1, x_2, x_3)</math> satisfy the condition that,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">


<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~m^2</math>
<math>m^2</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
   </td>
   </td>
  <td align="center"><math>\equiv</math></td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~a_1^2 \sum_{i=1}^{3} \frac{x_i^2}{a_i^2} \, ,</math>
<math>a_1^2 \sum_{i=1}^{3} \frac{x_i^2}{a_i^2} \, ,</math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 182: Line 179:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\rho(m^2)</math>
<math>\rho(m^2)</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~\rho_c \biggl[1 - \frac{m^2}{a_1^2}\biggr]^n </math>
<math>\rho_c \biggl[1 - \frac{m^2}{a_1^2}\biggr]^n </math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
\rho_c \biggl[1 -  
\rho_c \biggl[1 -  
\sum_{i=1}^{3} \frac{x_i^2}{a_i^2} \biggr]^n  
\sum_{i=1}^{3} \frac{x_i^2}{a_i^2} \biggr]^n  
Line 200: Line 197:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
\rho_c \biggl[1 - \biggl( \frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} + \frac{z^2}{c^2}\biggr) \biggr]^n  
\rho_c \biggl[1 - \biggl( \frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} + \frac{z^2}{c^2}\biggr) \biggr]^n  
\, .</math>
\, .</math>
Line 214: Line 211:
</td></tr></table>
</td></tr></table>


According to Theorem 13 of [[Appendix/References#EFE|EFE]] &#8212; see his Chapter 3, &sect;20 (p. 53) &#8212; the potential at any point inside a triaxial ellipsoid with this specific density distribution is given by the expression,
According to Theorem 13 of [<b>[[Appendix/References#EFE|<font color="red">EFE</font>]]</b>] &#8212; see his Chapter 3, &sect;20 (p. 53) &#8212; the potential at any point inside a triaxial ellipsoid with this specific density distribution is given by the expression,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">


<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\bold{x})</math>
<math>\Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\mathbf{x})</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
=
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
- \frac{\pi G \rho_c a_1 a_2 a_3}{(n+1)}  \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta } Q^{n+1}  \, ,
- \frac{\pi G \rho_c a_1 a_2 a_3}{(n+1)}  \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta } Q^{n+1}  \, ,
</math>
</math>
Line 234: Line 231:
</td></tr>
</td></tr>
</table>
</table>
where, <math>~\Delta</math> has the same definition as [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/HomogeneousEllipsoids#Derivation_of_Expressions_for_Ai|above]], and,
where, <math>\Delta</math> has the same definition as [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/HomogeneousEllipsoids#Derivation_of_Expressions_for_Ai|above]], and,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">


<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~Q</math>
<math>Q</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
<math>\equiv</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \, .
1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \, .
</math>
</math>
Line 252: Line 249:
</table>
</table>


For purposes of illustration, in what follows we will assume that, <math>~a_1 > a_2 > a_3</math>.
For purposes of illustration, in what follows we will assume that, <math>a_1 > a_2 > a_3</math>.


===The Case Where n = 0===
===The Case Where n = 0===


When <math>~n = 0</math>, we have a uniform-density configuration, and the "interior" potential will be given by the expression,
When <math>n = 0</math>, we have a uniform-density configuration, and the "interior" potential will be given by the expression,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">


<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\bold{x})</math>
<math>\Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\mathbf{x})</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
=
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>- \pi G \rho_c a_1 a_2 a_3  \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta } \biggl[ 1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \biggr]</math>
- \pi G \rho_c a_1 a_2 a_3  \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta } \biggl[ 1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \biggr]
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 278: Line 273:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
- \pi G \rho_c a_1 a_2 a_3 \biggl\{   
- \pi G \rho_c a_1 a_2 a_3 \biggl\{   
\int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta }  
\int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta }  
Line 297: Line 292:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
- \pi G \rho_c a_1 a_2 a_3 \biggl\{   
- \pi G \rho_c a_1 a_2 a_3 \biggl\{   
\int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta }  
\int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta }  
~ - ~x^2 \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta (a_1^2 + u) }  
- ~x^2 \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta (a_1^2 + u) }  
~ - ~y^2 \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta (a_2^2 + u) }   
- ~y^2 \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta (a_2^2 + u) }   
~ - ~ \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta (a_3^2 + u) }  
- ~ \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta (a_3^2 + u) }  
\biggr\}
\biggr\}
</math>
</math>
Line 316: Line 311:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math> = </math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
-\pi G \rho_c \biggl[ I_\mathrm{BT} a_1^2 - \biggl(A_1 x^2 + A_2 y^2 +A_3 z^2 \biggr) \biggr] \, .</math>
-\pi G \rho_c \biggl[ I_\mathrm{BT} a_1^2 - \biggl(A_1 x^2 + A_2 y^2 +A_3 z^2 \biggr) \biggr] \, .</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 335: Line 330:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\sum_{\ell = 1}^3 A_\ell</math>
<math>\sum_{\ell = 1}^3 A_\ell</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math> = </math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~2 \, ,</math>
<math>2 \, ,</math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 352: Line 347:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\nabla^2\Phi_\mathrm{grav} = \biggl[\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}  + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial z^2}\biggr]\Phi_\mathrm{grav}</math>
<math>\nabla^2\Phi_\mathrm{grav} = \biggl[\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}  + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial z^2}\biggr]\Phi_\mathrm{grav}</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math> = </math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
+ 2\pi G \rho_c (A_1 + A_2 + A_3) = 4\pi G\rho_c \, .
+ 2\pi G \rho_c (A_1 + A_2 + A_3) = 4\pi G\rho_c \, .
</math>
</math>
Line 368: Line 363:
===The Case Where n = 1===
===The Case Where n = 1===


When <math>~n = 1</math>, we have a specific heterogeneous density configuration, and the "interior" potential will be given by the expression,
When <math>n = 1</math>, we have a specific heterogeneous density configuration, and the "interior" potential will be given by the expression,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">


<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{ \Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\bold{x})}{(-\pi G\rho_c)} </math>
<math>\frac{ \Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\mathbf{x})}{(-\pi G\rho_c)} </math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
\frac{1}{2} a_1 a_2 a_3  \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta } \biggl[ 1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \biggr]^2
\frac{1}{2} a_1 a_2 a_3  \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta } \biggl[ 1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \biggr]^2
</math>
</math>
Line 390: Line 385:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
\frac{1}{2} a_1 a_2 a_3  \biggl\{   
\frac{1}{2} a_1 a_2 a_3  \biggl\{   
\int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta } \biggl[ 1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \biggr]
\int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta } \biggl[ 1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \biggr]
~- ~ x^2 \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta (a_1^2 + u)} \biggl[ 1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \biggr]
- ~ x^2 \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta (a_1^2 + u)} \biggl[ 1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \biggr]
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 409: Line 404:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
~- ~y^2 \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta (a_2^2 + u)}  \biggl[ 1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \biggr]
- ~y^2 \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta (a_2^2 + u)}  \biggl[ 1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \biggr]
~ - ~z^2 \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta (a_3^2 + u)} \biggl[ 1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \biggr]
- ~z^2 \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta (a_3^2 + u)} \biggl[ 1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \biggr]
\biggr\} \, .
\biggr\} \, .
</math>
</math>
Line 418: Line 413:
</table>
</table>


The first definite-integral expression inside the curly braces is, to within a leading factor of <math>~\tfrac{1}{2}</math>, identical to the entire expression for the normalized potential that was derived in the case where n = 0. That is, we can write,
The first definite-integral expression inside the curly braces is, to within a leading factor of <math>\tfrac{1}{2}</math>, identical to the entire expression for the normalized potential that was derived in the case where n = 0. That is, we can write,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">


<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{ \Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\bold{x})}{(-\pi G\rho_c)} </math>
<math>\frac{ \Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\mathbf{x})}{(-\pi G\rho_c)} </math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
\frac{1}{2} \biggl[ I_\mathrm{BT} a_1^2 - \biggl(A_1 x^2 + A_2 y^2 +A_3 z^2 \biggr) \biggr]
\frac{1}{2} \biggl[ I_\mathrm{BT} a_1^2 - \biggl(A_1 x^2 + A_2 y^2 +A_3 z^2 \biggr) \biggr]
~- \frac{1}{2} a_1 a_2 a_3  \biggl\{ ~ x^2 \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta (a_1^2 + u)} \biggl[ 1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \biggr]
- \frac{1}{2} a_1 a_2 a_3  \biggl\{ ~ x^2 \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta (a_1^2 + u)} \biggl[ 1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \biggr]
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 444: Line 439:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
~+~y^2 \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta (a_2^2 + u)}  \biggl[ 1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \biggr]
+~y^2 \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta (a_2^2 + u)}  \biggl[ 1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \biggr]
~ + ~z^2 \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta (a_3^2 + u)} \biggl[ 1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \biggr]
+ ~z^2 \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta (a_3^2 + u)} \biggl[ 1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \biggr]
\biggr\} \, .
\biggr\} \, .
</math>
</math>
Line 457: Line 452:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~a_1 a_2 a_3 \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta (a_i^2 + u)}  \biggl[ 1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \biggr]</math>
<math>a_1 a_2 a_3 \int_0^\infty \frac{ du}{\Delta (a_i^2 + u)}  \biggl[ 1 - \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 \frac{x_\ell^2}{ a_\ell^2 + u }  \biggr]</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
Line 463: Line 458:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
\biggl( A_i - \sum_{\ell=1}^3 A_{i\ell} x_\ell^2 \biggr) \, .
\biggl( A_i - \sum_{\ell=1}^3 A_{i\ell} x_\ell^2 \biggr) \, .
</math>
</math>
Line 478: Line 473:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\frac{ \Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\bold{x})}{(-\pi G\rho_c)} </math>
<math>\frac{ \Phi_\mathrm{grav}(\mathbf{x})}{(-\pi G\rho_c)} </math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
\frac{1}{2} \biggl[ I_\mathrm{BT} a_1^2 - \biggl(A_1 x^2 + A_2 y^2 +A_3 z^2 \biggr) \biggr]
\frac{1}{2} \biggl[ I_\mathrm{BT} a_1^2 - \biggl(A_1 x^2 + A_2 y^2 +A_3 z^2 \biggr) \biggr]
~- \frac{x^2}{2}  \biggl( A_1 - \sum_{\ell=1}^3 A_{1\ell} x_\ell^2 \biggr)
- \frac{x^2}{2}  \biggl( A_1 - \sum_{\ell=1}^3 A_{1\ell} x_\ell^2 \biggr)
~- \frac{y^2}{2}  \biggl( A_2 - \sum_{\ell=1}^3 A_{2\ell} x_\ell^2 \biggr)
- \frac{y^2}{2}  \biggl( A_2 - \sum_{\ell=1}^3 A_{2\ell} x_\ell^2 \biggr)
~- \frac{z^2}{2}  \biggl( A_3 - \sum_{\ell=1}^3 A_{3\ell} x_\ell^2 \biggr) \, .
- \frac{z^2}{2}  \biggl( A_3 - \sum_{\ell=1}^3 A_{3\ell} x_\ell^2 \biggr) \, .
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 498: Line 493:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
\frac{1}{2} \biggl[ I_\mathrm{BT} a_1^2 - \biggl(A_1 x^2 + A_2 y^2 +A_3 z^2 \biggr) \biggr]
\frac{1}{2} \biggl[ I_\mathrm{BT} a_1^2 - \biggl(A_1 x^2 + A_2 y^2 +A_3 z^2 \biggr) \biggr]
~- \frac{x^2}{2}  \biggl[ A_1 - \biggl( A_{11}x^2 + A_{12}y^2 + A_{13}z^2 \biggr) \biggr]
- \frac{x^2}{2}  \biggl[ A_1 - \biggl( A_{11}x^2 + A_{12}y^2 + A_{13}z^2 \biggr) \biggr]
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 516: Line 511:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
~- \frac{y^2}{2}  \biggl[ A_2 - \biggl( A_{21}x^2 + A_{22}y^2 + A_{23}z^2 \biggr) \biggr]
- \frac{y^2}{2}  \biggl[ A_2 - \biggl( A_{21}x^2 + A_{22}y^2 + A_{23}z^2 \biggr) \biggr]
~- \frac{z^2}{2}  \biggl[ A_3 - \biggl( A_{31}x^2 + A_{32}y^2 + A_{33}z^2 \biggr) \biggr]  
- \frac{z^2}{2}  \biggl[ A_3 - \biggl( A_{31}x^2 + A_{32}y^2 + A_{33}z^2 \biggr) \biggr]  
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 528: Line 523:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
\frac{1}{2} I_\mathrm{BT} a_1^2  
\frac{1}{2} I_\mathrm{BT} a_1^2  
- \biggl(A_1 x^2 + A_2 y^2 +A_3 z^2 \biggr)  
- \biggl(A_1 x^2 + A_2 y^2 +A_3 z^2 \biggr)  
Line 548: Line 543:


<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr><td align="center" colspan="3">for <math>~i \ne j</math></td></tr>
<tr><td align="center" colspan="3">for <math>i \ne j</math></td></tr>
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~A_{ij}</math>
<math>A_{ij}</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
<math>\equiv</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~-\frac{A_i-A_j}{(a_i^2 - a_j^2)} </math>
<math>-\frac{A_i-A_j}{(a_i^2 - a_j^2)} </math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 567: Line 562:


<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr><td align="center" colspan="3">for <math>~i = j</math></td></tr>
<tr><td align="center" colspan="3">for <math>i = j</math></td></tr>
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~2A_{ii} + \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 A_{i\ell}</math>
<math>2A_{ii} + \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 A_{i\ell}</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{2}{a_i} </math>
<math>\frac{2}{a_i^2} </math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 587: Line 582:




and we have made use of the symmetry relation, <math>~A_{ij} = A_{ji}</math>.  Again, as a check, let's see if this scalar potential satisfies the differential form of the
and we have made use of the symmetry relation, <math>A_{ij} = A_{ji}</math>.  Again, as a check, let's see if this scalar potential satisfies the differential form of the
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<span id="PGE:Poisson"><font color="#770000">'''Poisson Equation'''</font></span><br />
<span id="PGE:Poisson"><font color="#770000">'''Poisson Equation'''</font></span><br />
Line 598: Line 593:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\nabla^2 \biggl[ \frac{\Phi_\mathrm{grav}}{-2\pi G \rho_c} \biggr] </math>
<math>\nabla^2 \biggl[ \frac{\Phi_\mathrm{grav}}{-2\pi G \rho_c} \biggr] </math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
\frac{1}{2}\biggl[\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}  + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial z^2}\biggr]  
\frac{1}{2}\biggl[\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}  + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial z^2}\biggr]  
\biggl[- \biggl(A_1 x^2 + A_2 y^2 +A_3 z^2 \biggr)  
\biggl[- \biggl(A_1 x^2 + A_2 y^2 +A_3 z^2 \biggr)  
~+ \biggl( A_{12} x^2y^2 + A_{13} x^2z^2 + A_{23} y^2z^2\biggr)
+ \biggl( A_{12} x^2y^2 + A_{13} x^2z^2 + A_{23} y^2z^2\biggr)
~+ \frac{1}{2}  \biggl(A_{11}x^4 +  A_{22}y^4 + A_{33}z^4  \biggr)  
+ \frac{1}{2}  \biggl(A_{11}x^4 +  A_{22}y^4 + A_{33}z^4  \biggr)  
\biggr]
\biggr]
</math>
</math>
Line 619: Line 614:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
\frac{\partial}{\partial x}  \biggl[- A_1 x  ~+ A_{12} x y^2 + A_{13} x z^2 ~+ A_{11}x^3  \biggr]
\frac{\partial}{\partial x}  \biggl[- A_1 x  ~+ A_{12} x y^2 + A_{13} x z^2 ~+ A_{11}x^3  \biggr]
+\frac{\partial}{\partial y}  \biggl[- A_2 y  ~+  A_{12} x^2y  + A_{23} y z^2~+ A_{22}y^3  \biggr]
+\frac{\partial}{\partial y}  \biggl[- A_2 y  ~+  A_{12} x^2y  + A_{23} y z^2~+ A_{22}y^3  \biggr]
Line 635: Line 630:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~
<math>
\biggl[- A_1  + A_{12} y^2 + A_{13} z^2 ~+ 3A_{11}x^2  \biggr]
\biggl[- A_1  + A_{12} y^2 + A_{13} z^2 ~+ 3A_{11}x^2  \biggr]
+ \biggl[- A_2 +  A_{12} x^2  + A_{23} z^2~+ 3A_{22}y^2  \biggr]
+ \biggl[- A_2 +  A_{12} x^2  + A_{23} z^2~+ 3A_{22}y^2  \biggr]
Line 651: Line 646:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~ - (A_1 + A_2 + A_3) + x^2(3A_{11} + A_{12} + A_{13}) + y^2( 3A_{22} + A_{12} + A_{23}) + z^2( 3A_{33} + A_{13} + A_{23})\, .
<math>- (A_1 + A_2 + A_3) + x^2(3A_{11} + A_{12} + A_{13}) + y^2( 3A_{22} + A_{12} + A_{23}) + z^2( 3A_{33} + A_{13} + A_{23})\, .
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 660: Line 655:
</table>
</table>


In addition to recognizing, as [[#SumTo2|stated above]], that <math>~(A_1 + A_2 + A_3) = 2</math>, and making explicit use of the relation,
In addition to recognizing, as [[#SumTo2|stated above]], that <math>(A_1 + A_2 + A_3) = 2</math>, and making explicit use of the relation,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~2A_{ii} + \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 A_{i\ell}</math>
<math>2A_{ii} + \sum_{\ell = 1}^3 A_{i\ell}</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~\frac{2}{a_i} \, ,</math>
<math>\frac{2}{a_i^2} \, ,</math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 679: Line 674:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\nabla^2 \biggl[ \frac{\Phi_\mathrm{grav}}{-2\pi G \rho_c} \biggr] </math>
<math>\nabla^2 \biggl[ \frac{\Phi_\mathrm{grav}}{-2\pi G \rho_c} \biggr] </math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~ - (2) + \frac{2x^2}{a_1^2} + \frac{2y^2}{a_2^2} + \frac{2z^2}{a_3^2}
<math>- (2) + \frac{2x^2}{a_1^2} + \frac{2y^2}{a_2^2} + \frac{2z^2}{a_3^2}
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 692: Line 687:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\Rightarrow ~~~ \nabla^2 \Phi_\mathrm{grav}</math>
<math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \nabla^2 \Phi_\mathrm{grav}</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~ 4\pi G \rho_c \biggl[ 1 -  \biggl( \frac{x^2}{a_1^2} + \frac{y^2}{a_2^2} + \frac{z^2}{a_3^2}\biggr) \biggr] \, .
<math>4\pi G \rho_c \biggl[ 1 -  \biggl( \frac{x^2}{a_1^2} + \frac{y^2}{a_2^2} + \frac{z^2}{a_3^2}\biggr) \biggr] \, .
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 708: Line 703:
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>~\rho</math>
<math>\rho</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center">
   <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
<math>=</math>
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>\rho_c \biggl[ 1 -  \biggl( \frac{x^2}{a_1^2} + \frac{y^2}{a_2^2} + \frac{z^2}{a_3^2}\biggr) \biggr] \, .
<math>
\rho_c \biggl[ 1 -  \biggl( \frac{x^2}{a_1^2} + \frac{y^2}{a_2^2} + \frac{z^2}{a_3^2}\biggr) \biggr] \, .
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>

Latest revision as of 13:52, 3 August 2024

Ferrers (1877) Gravitational Potential for Inhomogeneous Ellipsoids[edit]

Ferrers
Potential
(1877)

In an accompanying chapter titled, Properties of Homogeneous Ellipsoids (1), we have shown how analytic expressions may be derived for the gravitational potential inside of uniform-density ellipsoids. In that discussion, we largely followed the derivations of [EFE]. In the latter part of the nineteenth-century, 📚 N. M. Ferrers (1877, Quart. J. Pure Appl. Math., Vol. 14, pp. 1 - 22) showed that very similar analytic expressions can be derived for ellipsoids that have certain, specific inhomogeneous mass distributions. Here we specifically discuss the case of configurations that exhibit concentric ellipsoidal iso-density surfaces of the form,

ρ

=

ρc[1(x2a12+y2a22+z2a32)].

SUMMARY — copied from accompanying, Trial #2 Discussion

After studying the relevant sections of both [EFE] and [BT87] — this is an example of a heterogeneous density distribution whose gravitational potential has an analytic prescription. As is discussed in a separate chapter, the potential that it generates is sometimes referred to as a Ferrers potential, for the exponent, n = 1.

In our accompanying discussion we find that,

Φgrav(𝐱)(πGρc)

=

12IBTa12(A1x2+A2y2+A3z2)+(A12x2y2+A13x2z2+A23y2z2)+16(3A11x4+3A22y4+3A33z4),

where,

for ij

Aij

AiAj(ai2aj2)

[ EFE, §21, Eq. (107) ]
for i=j

2Aii+=13Ai

=

2ai2

[ EFE, §21, Eq. (109) ]

More specifically, in the three cases where the indices, i=j,

3A11

=

2a12(A12+A13),

3A22

=

2a22(A21+A23),

3A33

=

2a32(A31+A32).


Derivation[edit]

Other references to Ferrers Potential:

Following §2.3.2 (beginning on p. 60) of [BT87], let's examine inhomogeneous configurations whose isodensity surfaces (including the surface, itself) are defined by triaxial ellipsoids on which the Cartesian coordinates (x1,x2,x3) satisfy the condition that,

m2

a12i=13xi2ai2,

[ EFE, Chapter 3, §20, p. 50, Eq. (75) ]
[ BT87, §2.3.2, p. 61, Eq. (2-97) ]

be constant. More specifically, let's consider the case (related to the so-called Ferrers potentials) in which the configuration's density distribution is given by the expression,

ρ(m2)

=

ρc[1m2a12]n

=

ρc[1i=13xi2ai2]n

=

ρc[1(x2a2+y2b2+z2c2)]n.

NOTE:     In our accompanying discussion of compressible analogues of Riemann S-type ellipsoids, we have discovered that — at least in the context of infinitesimally thin, nonaxisymmetric disks — this heterogeneous density profile can be nicely paired with an analytically expressible stream function, at least for the case where the integer exponent is, n = 1.

According to Theorem 13 of [EFE] — see his Chapter 3, §20 (p. 53) — the potential at any point inside a triaxial ellipsoid with this specific density distribution is given by the expression,

Φgrav(𝐱)

=

πGρca1a2a3(n+1)0duΔQn+1,

[ EFE, Chapter 3, §20, p. 53, Eq. (101) ]

where, Δ has the same definition as above, and,

Q

1=13x2a2+u.

For purposes of illustration, in what follows we will assume that, a1>a2>a3.

The Case Where n = 0[edit]

When n=0, we have a uniform-density configuration, and the "interior" potential will be given by the expression,

Φgrav(𝐱)

=

πGρca1a2a30duΔ[1=13x2a2+u]

 

=

πGρca1a2a3{0duΔ0duΔ(x2a12+u)0duΔ(y2a22+u)0duΔ(z2a32+u)}

 

=

πGρca1a2a3{0duΔx20duΔ(a12+u)y20duΔ(a22+u)0duΔ(a32+u)}

 

=

πGρc[IBTa12(A1x2+A2y2+A3z2)].

As a check, let's see if this scalar potential satisfies the differential form of the

Poisson Equation

2Φ=4πGρ

Given that,

=13A

=

2,

[ EFE, §21, Eq. (108) ]

we find,

2Φgrav=[2x2+2y2+2z2]Φgrav

=

+2πGρc(A1+A2+A3)=4πGρc.

Q.E.D.

The Case Where n = 1[edit]

When n=1, we have a specific heterogeneous density configuration, and the "interior" potential will be given by the expression,

Φgrav(𝐱)(πGρc)

=

12a1a2a30duΔ[1=13x2a2+u]2

 

=

12a1a2a3{0duΔ[1=13x2a2+u]x20duΔ(a12+u)[1=13x2a2+u]

 

 

y20duΔ(a22+u)[1=13x2a2+u]z20duΔ(a32+u)[1=13x2a2+u]}.

The first definite-integral expression inside the curly braces is, to within a leading factor of 12, identical to the entire expression for the normalized potential that was derived in the case where n = 0. That is, we can write,

Φgrav(𝐱)(πGρc)

=

12[IBTa12(A1x2+A2y2+A3z2)]12a1a2a3{x20duΔ(a12+u)[1=13x2a2+u]

 

 

+y20duΔ(a22+u)[1=13x2a2+u]+z20duΔ(a32+u)[1=13x2a2+u]}.

Then, from §22, p. 56 of EFE, we see that,

a1a2a30duΔ(ai2+u)[1=13x2a2+u]

=

(Ai=13Aix2).

[ EFE, Chapter 3, §22, p. 53, Eq. (125) ]

Applying this result to each of the other three definite integrals gives us,

Φgrav(𝐱)(πGρc)

=

12[IBTa12(A1x2+A2y2+A3z2)]x22(A1=13A1x2)y22(A2=13A2x2)z22(A3=13A3x2).

 

=

12[IBTa12(A1x2+A2y2+A3z2)]x22[A1(A11x2+A12y2+A13z2)]

 

 

y22[A2(A21x2+A22y2+A23z2)]z22[A3(A31x2+A32y2+A33z2)]

 

=

12IBTa12(A1x2+A2y2+A3z2)+(A12x2y2+A13x2z2+A23y2z2)+12(A11x4+A22y4+A33z4),

where,

for ij

Aij

AiAj(ai2aj2)

[ EFE, §21, Eq. (107) ]
for i=j

2Aii+=13Ai

=

2ai2

[ EFE, §21, Eq. (109) ]


and we have made use of the symmetry relation, Aij=Aji. Again, as a check, let's see if this scalar potential satisfies the differential form of the

Poisson Equation

2Φ=4πGρ

We find,

2[Φgrav2πGρc]

=

12[2x2+2y2+2z2][(A1x2+A2y2+A3z2)+(A12x2y2+A13x2z2+A23y2z2)+12(A11x4+A22y4+A33z4)]

 

=

x[A1x+A12xy2+A13xz2+A11x3]+y[A2y+A12x2y+A23yz2+A22y3]+z[A3z+A13x2z+A23y2z+A33z3]

 

=

[A1+A12y2+A13z2+3A11x2]+[A2+A12x2+A23z2+3A22y2]+[A3+A13x2+A23y2+3A33z2]

 

=

(A1+A2+A3)+x2(3A11+A12+A13)+y2(3A22+A12+A23)+z2(3A33+A13+A23).

In addition to recognizing, as stated above, that (A1+A2+A3)=2, and making explicit use of the relation,

2Aii+=13Ai

=

2ai2,

this last expression can be simplified to discover that,

2[Φgrav2πGρc]

=

(2)+2x2a12+2y2a22+2z2a32

2Φgrav

=

4πGρc[1(x2a12+y2a22+z2a32)].

This does indeed demonstrate that the derived gravitational potential is consistent with our selected mass distribution in the case where n = 1, namely,

ρ

=

ρc[1(x2a12+y2a22+z2a32)].

Q.E.D.

See Also[edit]


Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |