SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/RedGiantToPN/Pt3: Difference between revisions

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
Created page with "__FORCETOC__ =Main Sequence to Red Giant to Planetary Nebula (Part 2)= <table border="1" align="center" width="100%" colspan="8"> <tr> <td align="center" bgcolor="lightblue" width="25%"><br />Part I:  Background & Objective   </td> <td align="center" bgcolor="lightblue" width="25%"><br />Part II:    </td> <td align="center" bgcolor="lightblue" wi..."
 
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__FORCETOC__
__FORCETOC__
=Main Sequence to Red Giant to Planetary Nebula (Part 2)=
=Main Sequence to Red Giant to Planetary Nebula (Part 3)=
<table border="1" align="center" width="100%" colspan="8">
<table border="1" align="center" width="100%" colspan="8">
<tr>
<tr>
Line 9: Line 9:
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="center" bgcolor="lightblue" width="25%"><br />[[SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/RedGiantToPN/Pt3|Part III:&nbsp; ]]
   <td align="center" bgcolor="lightblue" width="25%"><br />[[SSC/Stability/BiPolytropes/RedGiantToPN/Pt3|Yabushita68-Motivated Analysis]]
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
   </td>
   </td>
Line 20: Line 20:
==Yabushita68-Motivated Analysis==
==Yabushita68-Motivated Analysis==
In an [[SSC/Perturbations#2ndOrderODE|accompanying discussion]], we derived the so-called,
In an [[SSC/Perturbations#2ndOrderODE|accompanying discussion]], we derived the so-called,
<div align="center">
<font color="maroon"><b>Polytropic LAWE</b></font><br />
{{ Math/EQ_RadialPulsation02 }}
</div>
Motivated by [[SSC/Stability/Isothermal#Yabushita_(1968)|the derivation presented by]]  {{ Yabushita68full }}, let's now insert an integration constant, <math>C_0</math>, into this 2<sup>nd</sup>-order ODE to obtain what we henceforth will refer to as the,
<table border=0 cellpadding=2 align="center">
<tr>
<td align="center" colspan="1">
<font color="maroon"><b>Yabushita68-Motivated Polytropic LAWE</b></font><br />
</td>
</tr>
<td align="center">
<math>C_0 = \frac{d^2x}{d\eta^2} + \biggl[ 4 - (n+1) Q \biggr] \frac{1}{\eta} \cdot \frac{dx}{d\eta} 
+ (n+1) \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{\sigma_c^2}{6\gamma_g } \biggr)  \frac{\eta^2}{\theta}
- \alpha Q\biggr]  \frac{x}{\eta^2} </math>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
After setting <math>\sigma_c^2 = 0</math>, let's guess an eigenfunction of the form,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>x</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\eta^{-m}~~~\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{dx}{d\eta} = -m\eta^{-m-1}
</math>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; and &nbsp; &nbsp;
<math> \frac{d^2x}{d\eta^2} = -m(-m-1)\eta^{-m-2} \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
in which case we find that,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>C_0</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
-m(-m-1)\eta^{-m-2}
+ \biggl[ 4 - (n+1) Q \biggr] \frac{1}{\eta} \biggl[ -m\eta^{-m-1} \biggr]
+ (n+1) \biggl[  - \alpha Q\biggr]  \eta^{-m - 2}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl\{~
m(m+1)
- \biggl[ 4 - (n+1) Q \biggr]  \biggl[ m \biggr]
+ (n+1) \biggl[  - \alpha Q\biggr]
~\biggr\} \eta^{-m - 2}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl\{~
m(m+1) -4m
+\biggl[ m(n+1) \biggr]  Q
- \biggl[  \alpha(n+1)  \biggr]Q
~\biggr\} \eta^{-m - 2}
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl\{~
m^2 - 3m
+ (n+1)( m - \alpha )  Q
~\biggr\} \eta^{-m - 2}
\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
The dependence on <math>Q</math> can be eliminated if we set <math>m = \alpha</math>; in which case we obtain,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>C_0</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center"><math>=</math></td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
\biggl\{~
\alpha^2 - 3\alpha
~\biggr\} \eta^{-m - 2}
\, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>


=Related Discussions=
=Related Discussions=


{{ SGFfooter }}
{{ SGFfooter }}

Latest revision as of 14:13, 6 January 2026

Main Sequence to Red Giant to Planetary Nebula (Part 3)[edit]


Part I:  Background & Objective

 


Part II: 

 


Yabushita68-Motivated Analysis

 


Part IV: 

 

Yabushita68-Motivated Analysis[edit]

In an accompanying discussion, we derived the so-called,


Polytropic LAWE

0=d2xdξ2+[4(n+1)Q]1ξdxdξ+(n+1)[(σc26γg)ξ2θαQ]xξ2

where:    Q(ξ)dlnθdlnξ,    σc23ω22πGρc,     and,     α(34γg)

Motivated by the derivation presented by 📚 S. Yabushita (1968, MNRAS, Vol. 140, pp. 109 - 120), let's now insert an integration constant, C0, into this 2nd-order ODE to obtain what we henceforth will refer to as the,

Yabushita68-Motivated Polytropic LAWE

C0=d2xdη2+[4(n+1)Q]1ηdxdη+(n+1)[(σc26γg)η2θαQ]xη2

After setting σc2=0, let's guess an eigenfunction of the form,

x

=

ηmdxdη=mηm1       and     d2xdη2=m(m1)ηm2,

in which case we find that,

C0

=

m(m1)ηm2+[4(n+1)Q]1η[mηm1]+(n+1)[αQ]ηm2

 

=

{m(m+1)[4(n+1)Q][m]+(n+1)[αQ]}ηm2

 

=

{m(m+1)4m+[m(n+1)]Q[α(n+1)]Q}ηm2

 

=

{m23m+(n+1)(mα)Q}ηm2.

The dependence on Q can be eliminated if we set m=α; in which case we obtain,

C0

=

{α23α}ηm2.

Related Discussions[edit]

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |