ParabolicDensity/GravPot: Difference between revisions

From JETohlineWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Joel2 (talk | contribs)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 352: Line 352:
After studying {{ Ferrers1877full }} and the relevant sections of both [<b>[[Appendix/References#EFE|<font color="red">EFE</font>]]</b>] and [<b>[[Appendix/References#BT87|<font color="red">BT87</font>]]</b>], we present here an example of a parabolic density distribution whose gravitational potential has an analytic prescription.  As is discussed in a [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/HomogeneousEllipsoids#Inhomogeneous_Ellipsoids_Leading_to_Ferrers_Potentials| separate chapter]], the potential that it generates is sometimes referred to as a [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/FerrersPotential|''Ferrers'' potential]], for the exponent, n = 1.
After studying {{ Ferrers1877full }} and the relevant sections of both [<b>[[Appendix/References#EFE|<font color="red">EFE</font>]]</b>] and [<b>[[Appendix/References#BT87|<font color="red">BT87</font>]]</b>], we present here an example of a parabolic density distribution whose gravitational potential has an analytic prescription.  As is discussed in a [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/HomogeneousEllipsoids#Inhomogeneous_Ellipsoids_Leading_to_Ferrers_Potentials| separate chapter]], the potential that it generates is sometimes referred to as a [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/FerrersPotential|''Ferrers'' potential]], for the exponent, n = 1.


In our [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/HomogeneousEllipsoids#GravFor1|accompanying discussion]] we find that,
In our [[ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/FerrersPotential|accompanying discussion]] we find that,
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">


Line 406: Line 406:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>\frac{2}{a_i} </math>
<math>\frac{2}{a_i^2} </math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 632: Line 632:
</tr>
</tr>
</table>
</table>
<font color="red">This matches the gravitational potential</font> [[SSC/Structure/OtherAnalyticModels#ParabolicPotential|derived for a parabolic density distribution using spherical coordinates]].


=See Also=
=See Also=


{{ SGFfooter }}
{{ SGFfooter }}

Latest revision as of 13:42, 3 August 2024

Parabolic Density Distribution[edit]


Part I:   Gravitational Potential

 


Part II:   Spherical Structures

 


Part III:   Axisymmetric Equilibrium Structures

 


Part IV:   Triaxial Equilibrium Structures (Exploration)

 

Gravitational Potential[edit]

In an accompanying chapter titled, Properties of Homogeneous Ellipsoids (1), we have shown how analytic expressions may be derived for the gravitational potential inside of uniform-density ellipsoids. In that discussion, we largely followed the derivations of [EFE]. In the latter part of the nineteenth-century, 📚 N. M. Ferrers (1877, Quart. J. Pure Appl. Math., Vol. 14, pp. 1 - 22) showed that very similar analytic expressions can be derived for ellipsoids that have certain inhomogeneous mass distributions. Here we specifically discuss the case of configurations that exhibit concentric ellipsoidal iso-density surfaces of the form,

ρ

=

ρc[1(x2a12+y2a22+z2a32)],

that is, configurations with parabolic density distributions. Much of our presentation, here, is drawn from our separate, detailed description of what we will refer to as Ferrers potential.

Uniform-Density Reminders[edit]

We begin by reminding the reader that, for a uniform-density configuration, the "interior" potential will be given by the expression,

Φgrav(𝐱)

=

πGρc[IBTa12(A1x2+A2y2+A3z2)].

As we have shown in a separate presentation, if the three principal axes of the configuration are unequal in length and related to one another such that a1>a2>a3, the appropriate expressions for the four leading coefficients are,

A1

=

2a2a3a12[F(θ,k)E(θ,k)k2sin3θ];

A2

=

2a2a3a12[E(θ,k)(1k2)F(θ,k)(a3/a2)k2sinθk2(1k2)sin3θ];

A3

=

2a2a3a12[(a2/a3)sinθE(θ,k)(1k2)sin3θ];

IBT

=

2a2a3a12[F(θ,k)sinθ].

[EFE], Chapter 3, Eqs. (33), (34) & (35)

As can readily be demonstrated, this scalar potential satisfies the differential form of the

Poisson Equation

2Φ=4πGρ

As we have also demonstrated, if the longest axis, a1, and the intermediate axis, a2, of the ellipsoid are equal to one another, then an equatorial cross-section of the object presents a circle of radius a1 and the object is referred to as an oblate spheroid. For homogeneous oblate spheroids, evaluation of the integrals defining Ai and IBT gives,

A1

=

1e2[sin1ee(1e2)1/2](1e2)1/2;

A2

=

A1;

A3 =

2e2[(1e2)1/2sin1ee](1e2)1/2;

IBT =

2A1+A3(1e2)=2(1e2)1/2[sin1ee],

[EFE], Chapter 3, Eq. (36)
[T78], §4.5, Eqs. (48) & (49)

where the eccentricity,

e[1(a3a1)2]1/2.

Note the following, separately derived limits:

Table 1:  Limiting Values

 

e0

a3a10

sin1ee

1+e26+𝒪(e4)

π2(a3a1)+π4(a3a1)2𝒪(a33a13)

A1=A2

23[1e25𝒪(e4)]

π2(a3a1)2(a3a1)2+𝒪(a33a13)

A3

23[1+2e25+𝒪(e4)]

2π(a3a1)+4(a3a1)2𝒪(a33a13)

IBT

2

0

Hence, for a uniform-density sphere (e=0),

Φgrav(𝐱)

=

πGρc[IBTa12(A1x2+A2y2+A3z2)]

 

=

πGρc[2a1223(x2+y2+z2)]

 

=

2πGρca12[113(ra1)2]

 

=

3GM2a1[113(ra1)2].

J. B. Tatum (2021) Celestial Mechanics class notes (UVic), §5.8.9, p. 36, Eq. (5.8.23)

This matches the expression for the gravitational potential inside (and on the surface) of a uniform-density sphere, as we have derived in an accompanying chapter.

Parabolic Density Distribution[edit]

SUMMARY — copied from accompanying, Trial #2 Discussion

After studying 📚 N. M. Ferrers (1877, Quart. J. Pure Appl. Math., Vol. 14, pp. 1 - 22) and the relevant sections of both [EFE] and [BT87], we present here an example of a parabolic density distribution whose gravitational potential has an analytic prescription. As is discussed in a separate chapter, the potential that it generates is sometimes referred to as a Ferrers potential, for the exponent, n = 1.

In our accompanying discussion we find that,

Φgrav(𝐱)(πGρc)

=

12IBTa12(A1x2+A2y2+A3z2)+(A12x2y2+A13x2z2+A23y2z2)+16(3A11x4+3A22y4+3A33z4),

where,

for ij

Aij

AiAj(ai2aj2)

[ EFE, §21, Eq. (107) ]
for i=j

2Aii+=13Ai

=

2ai2

[ EFE, §21, Eq. (109) ]

More specifically, in the three cases where the indices, i=j,

3A11

=

2a12(A12+A13),

3A22

=

2a22(A21+A23),

3A33

=

2a32(A31+A32).


In the case of an axisymmetric (am=a), but nearly spherical configuration,

A1=A2

=

23[1e25𝒪(e4)];

A3

=

23[1+2e25+𝒪(e4)].

Hence,

A13=A23

=

A1A3a12e2

 

=

23a12e2[(1e25)(1+2e25)+𝒪(e4)]

 

=

23a12[35+𝒪(e2)]

 

25a12.

These results match our separate derivations in the case of a sphere. Specifically,

A1=A2=A3

=

23;

and,

A11=A12=A13=A22=A23=A33

=

25a12.

Hence, for a sphere with a parabolic density distribution, we find,

Φgrav(𝐱)(πGρc)

=

a1223r2+25a12(x2y2+x2z2+y2z2)+15a12(x4+y4+z4).

This matches the gravitational potential derived for a parabolic density distribution using spherical coordinates.

See Also[edit]

Tiled Menu

Appendices: | VisTrailsEquations | VisTrailsVariables | References | Ramblings | VisTrailsImages | myphys.lsu | ADS |