Editing
SSC/Stability/Yabushita75
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
__FORCETOC__ <!-- __NOTOC__ will force TOC off --> =Stability of a BiPolytrope with an Isothermal Core= This analysis pulls largely from {{ Yabushita75full }}; the focus is on bipolytropes having <math>(n_c, n_e) = (\infty, \tfrac{3}{2})</math>. In an [[SSC/Stability/Isothermal#Yabushita_(1975)|accompanying discussion]], we summarize the steps that Yabushita took — from 1968 and 1974, to 1975 — that led up to his discovery of an analytic description of the isothermal displacement function. ==Equilibrium Structure== We will follow [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes#Setup|the accompanying formal recipe]] for building a bipolytropic model, using the [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic1.53#Our_Derivation|step-by-step construction of Milne's (1930)]] configurations as a guide. ===Step 1=== The {{ Yabushita75 }} bipolytrope has an isothermal core <math>(n_c = \infty)</math> and an <math>n_e = \tfrac{3}{2}</math> polytropic envelope. ===Steps 2 & 3=== Throughout the core, the properties of this bipolytrope can be expressed in terms of the Lane-Emden function, <math>\psi(\chi)</math>, which derives from a solution of the 2<sup>nd</sup>-order ODE, <div align="center" id="Chandrasekhar"> <font color="maroon"><b>Isothermal Lane-Emden Equation</b></font><br /> {{ Math/EQ_SSLaneEmden02 }} </div> subject to the boundary conditions, <div align="center"> <math>\psi = 1</math> and <math>\frac{d\psi}{d\xi} = 0</math> at <math>\xi = 0</math>. </div> As has been demonstrated in [[Appendix/Ramblings/PowerSeriesExpressions#IsothermalLaneEmden|our accompanying ''mathematics'' appendix]], a series expansion about the center of the isothermal configuration gives, <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>\psi(\xi) </math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>~\frac{\xi^2}{6} - \frac{\xi^4}{120} + \frac{\xi^6}{1890} - \frac{61 \xi^8}{1,632,960} + \cdots \, .</math> </td> </tr> </table> The solution, <math>\psi(\xi)</math>, extends to infinity, so the interface between the core and the envelope can be positioned anywhere within the range, <math>0 < \xi_i < \infty</math>. ===Step4: Throughout the core=== <div align="center"> <table border="0" cellpadding="3" width="50%"> <tr> <td align="center" colspan="4"> Specify: <math>c_s^2</math> and <math>\rho_0 ~\Rightarrow</math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>r</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>\biggl[ \frac{c_s^2}{4\pi G\rho_0} \biggr]^{1/2} \xi</math> </td> <td align="right">(2.2)</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>\rho</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>\rho_0 e^{-\psi}</math> </td> <td align="right">(2.2)</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>P</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>c_s^2 \rho_0 e^{-\psi}</math> </td> <td align="right">(2.1)</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>M_r</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>\biggl[ \frac{c_s^6}{4\pi G^3\rho_0} \biggr]^{1/2} \biggl( \xi^2 \frac{d\psi}{d\xi} \biggr)</math> </td> <td align="right">(2.3)</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="4" align="center">{{ Yabushita75 }}, § 2, pp. 442-443</td></tr> </table> </div> After adopting the substitute notation, <math>c_s^2 \rightarrow K_1</math> and <math>\rho_0 \rightarrow \lambda_c</math>, it is clear that these last four parameter-profile expressions are identical to the ones that appear, respectively, as equations (2.2), (2.1) and (2.3) of {{ Yabushita75 }}. ===Step 5: Interface Conditions=== <div align="center"> <!-- BEGIN RIGHT BLOCK details --> <table border="0" cellpadding="3"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>\biggl( \frac{\rho_0}{\mu_c} \biggr) e^{-\psi_i}</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>\biggl( \frac{\rho_e}{\mu_e} \biggr) \theta^{n_e}_i</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>\biggl( \frac{\rho_e}{\mu_e} \biggr) \theta^{3 / 2}_i</math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>c_s^2 \rho_0 e^{-\psi_i}</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>K_e \rho_e^{1+1/n_e} \theta^{n_e + 1}_i</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>K_e \rho_e^{5 / 3} \theta^{5 / 2}_i</math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>\biggl[ \frac{c_s^2}{4\pi G\rho_0} \biggr]^{1/2} \xi_i</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>\biggl[ \frac{(n_e + 1)K_e}{4\pi G} \biggr]^{1/2} \rho_e^{(1-n_e)/(2n_e)} \eta_i</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>\biggl[ \frac{(5 / 2)K_e}{4\pi G} \biggr]^{1/2} \rho_e^{(-1 / 6)} \eta_i</math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>\biggl[ \frac{c_s^6}{4\pi G^3\rho_0} \biggr]^{1/2} \biggl( \xi^2 \frac{d\psi}{d\xi} \biggr)_i</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>4\pi \biggl[ \frac{(n_e + 1)K_e}{4\pi G} \biggr]^{3/2} \rho_e^{(3-n_e)/(2n_e)} \biggl(-\eta^2 \frac{d\theta}{d\eta} \biggr)_i</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>4\pi \biggl[ \frac{(5 / 2)K_e}{4\pi G} \biggr]^{3/2} \rho_e^{1 / 2} \biggl(-\eta^2 \frac{d\theta}{d\eta} \biggr)_i</math> </td> </tr> </table> <!-- END RIGHT BLOCK details --> </div> This means that, <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\frac{\rho_e}{\rho_0}</math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)e^{-\psi_i} \theta_i^{-3 / 2} \, ; </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"><math>K_e \biggl[\rho_0 \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)e^{-\psi_i} \theta_i^{-3 / 2} \biggr]^{5 / 3} \theta^{5 / 2}_i</math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> c_s^2 \rho_0 e^{-\psi_i} </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{K_e \rho_0^{2 / 3}}{c_s^2} </math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-5 / 3}e^{+2\psi_i/3} </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{c_s^2}{K_e} </math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \biggl[ \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{5 / 2} \rho_0e^{-\psi_i} \biggr]^{2 / 3} \, ; </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\frac{\eta_i }{\xi_i} </math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \biggl[ \frac{c_s^2}{4\pi G\rho_0} \biggr]^{1/2} \biggl[ \frac{4\pi G}{(5 / 2)K_e} \biggr]^{1/2} \biggl[ \rho_e \biggr]^{1 / 6} </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \biggl(\frac{2}{5}\biggr)^{1 / 2} \biggl[ \frac{c_s^2}{K_e} \biggr]^{1/2} \biggl[ \rho_0 \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)e^{-\psi_i} \theta_i^{-3 / 2} \biggr]^{1 / 6}\rho_0^{- 1 / 2} </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \biggl(\frac{2}{5}\biggr)^{1 / 2} \biggl[ \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{5 / 2} \rho_0e^{-\psi_i} \biggr]^{1/3} \biggl[ \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{1 / 6}e^{-\psi_i / 6} \theta_i^{-1 / 4} \biggr]\rho_0^{- 1 / 3} </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \biggl(\frac{2}{5}\biggr)^{1 / 2} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr) e^{-\psi_i/ 2} \theta_i^{-1 / 4} \, . </math> </td> </tr> </table> And, finally, <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math> \biggl(-\eta^2 \frac{d\theta}{d\eta} \biggr)_i </math> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \frac{1}{4\pi}\biggl[ \frac{c_s^6}{4\pi G^3\rho_0} \biggr]^{1/2} \biggl[ \frac{4\pi G}{(5 / 2)K_e} \biggr]^{3/2} \biggl[\rho_e\biggr]^{- 1 / 2} \biggl( \xi^2 \frac{d\psi}{d\xi} \biggr)_i </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math>\biggl(\frac{2}{5}\biggr)^{3 / 2}\rho_0^{- 1 / 2} \biggl[ \frac{c_s^2}{K_e} \biggr]^{3/2} \biggl[\rho_0 \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)e^{-\psi_i} \theta_i^{-3 / 2}\biggr]^{- 1 / 2} \biggl( \xi^2 \frac{d\psi}{d\xi} \biggr)_i </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math>\biggl(\frac{2}{5}\biggr)^{3 / 2}\rho_0^{- 1 } \biggl[ \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{5 / 2} \rho_0e^{-\psi_i} \biggr] \biggl[\biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)e^{-\psi_i} \theta_i^{-3 / 2}\biggr]^{- 1 / 2} \biggl( \xi^2 \frac{d\psi}{d\xi} \biggr)_i </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math>\biggl(\frac{2}{5}\biggr)^{3 / 2} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{2} e^{-\psi_i / 2} \theta_i^{3 / 4} \biggl( \xi^2 \frac{d\psi}{d\xi} \biggr)_i </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \biggl(-\frac{d\theta}{d\eta} \biggr)_i </math> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math>\biggl(\frac{2}{5}\biggr)^{3 / 2} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{2} e^{-\psi_i / 2} \theta_i^{3 / 4} \biggl( \frac{d\psi}{d\xi} \biggr)_i \biggl[ \biggl(\frac{2}{5}\biggr)^{1 / 2} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr) e^{-\psi_i/ 2} \theta_i^{-1 / 4} \biggr]^{-2} </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math>\biggl(\frac{2}{5}\biggr)^{1 / 2} e^{+ \psi_i / 2} \theta_i^{5 / 4} \biggl( \frac{d\psi}{d\xi} \biggr)_i \, . </math> </td> </tr> </table> <table border="1" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="center" colspan="3">Summary Interface Relations</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center" colspan="1">Our Derivations</td> <td align="center" colspan="1">After setting <math>\rho_e = \rho_0</math></td> <td align="center" colspan="1">Presented by {{ Yabushita75 }}<br />(after setting <math>\mu_e/\mu_c = 1</math>)</td> </tr> <tr> <!-- One follows --> <td align="center" colspan="1"> <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\frac{\rho_e}{\rho_0}</math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)e^{-\psi_i} \theta_i^{-3 / 2} \, ; </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\frac{c_s^2}{K_e} </math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \biggl[ \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{5 / 2} \rho_0e^{-\psi_i} \biggr]^{2 / 3} \, ; </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\frac{\eta_i}{\xi_i}</math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \biggl(\frac{2}{5}\biggr)^{1 / 2} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr) e^{-\psi_i/ 2} \theta_i^{-1 / 4} \, ; </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> <math> \biggl(-\frac{d\theta}{d\eta} \biggr)_i </math> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math>\biggl(\frac{2}{5}\biggr)^{1 / 2} e^{+ \psi_i / 2} \theta_i^{5 / 4} \biggl( \frac{d\psi}{d\xi} \biggr)_i \, . </math> </td> </tr> </table> </td> <!-- Two follows: --> <td align="center" colspan="1"> <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\theta_i^{3 / 2}</math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)e^{-\psi_i} \, ; </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\biggl[ \frac{c_s^2}{K_e} \biggr]^{3} </math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{5 } \biggl[\rho_0e^{-\psi_i} \biggr]^{2} \, ; </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\frac{\eta_i}{\xi_i}</math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \biggl(\frac{2}{5}\biggr)^{1 / 2} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr) e^{-\psi_i/ 2} \biggl[ \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)e^{-\psi_i} \biggr]^{-1 / 6} = \biggl(\frac{2}{5}\biggr)^{1 / 2} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{5 / 6} e^{-\psi_i/ 3} \, ; </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> <math> \biggl(-\frac{d\theta}{d\eta} \biggr)_i </math> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \biggl(\frac{2}{5}\biggr)^{1 / 2} \biggl( \frac{d\psi}{d\xi} \biggr)_i e^{+ \psi_i / 2} \biggl[ \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)e^{-\psi_i} \biggr]^{5 / 6} = \biggl(\frac{2}{5}\biggr)^{1 / 2} \biggl( \frac{d\psi}{d\xi} \biggr)_i e^{- \psi_i / 3} \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{5 / 6} \, . </math> </td> </tr> </table> </td> <!-- Three follows --> <td align="center" colspan="1"> <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\theta_i^{3 / 2}</math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> e^{-\psi_i} \, ; </math> </td> <td align="right" width="5%">(2.9)</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\biggl[ \frac{c_s^2}{K_e} \biggr]^{3 / 2} </math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \lambda_c e^{-\psi_i} \, ; </math> </td> <td align="right" width="5%">(2.11)</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\frac{\eta_i}{\xi_i}</math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \biggl(\frac{2}{5}\biggr)^{1 / 2}e^{-\psi_i/ 3} \, ; </math> </td> <td align="right" width="5%">(2.12)</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> <math> \biggl(\frac{d\theta}{d\eta} \biggr)_i </math> </td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> -\biggl(\frac{2}{5}\biggr)^{1 / 2} \biggl( \frac{d\psi}{d\xi} \biggr)_i e^{- \psi_i / 3} \, . </math> </td> <td align="right" width="5%">(2.13)</td> </tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table> ===Step 8: Throughout the Envelope=== Throughout the envelope, we seek the solution, <math>\theta(\eta)</math>, of the following Lane-Emden equation: <div align="center"> <math> \frac{1}{\eta^2} \frac{d}{d\eta} \biggl( \eta^2 \frac{d\theta}{d\eta} \biggr) = - \theta^{3 / 2} \, . </math> </div> For the envelope, the [[SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes#Setup|associated key parameter relations]] are: <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="3"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>\rho</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>\rho_e \theta^{3 / 2}</math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>P</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>K_e \rho_e^{5 / 3} \theta^{5 / 2}</math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>r</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>\biggl[ \frac{(5/2)K_e}{4\pi G} \biggr]^{1/2} \rho_e^{- 1 / 6} \eta</math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>M_r</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>4\pi \biggl[ \frac{(5/2)K_e}{4\pi G} \biggr]^{3/2} \rho_e^{1 / 2} \biggl(-\eta^2 \frac{d\theta}{d\eta} \biggr)</math> </td> </tr> </table> The surface occurs where the polytropic Lane-Emden function, <math>\theta</math>, first goes to zero. We will denote the radius at which this occurs as <math>\eta_s</math> — {{ Yabushita75 }} denotes the same radial location by <math>\eta_1</math> — and the slope of the function at the surface will be denoted as <math>(d\theta/d\eta)_s</math>. ===Normalizations=== Following {{ Yabushita75 }}, along our model sequence we will hold <math>c_s^2</math> and <math>K_e</math> fixed. From the summary interface relations, then, we find that, <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\biggl[ \frac{c_s^2}{K_e} \biggr]^{3} </math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{5 } \biggl[\rho_0e^{-\psi_i} \biggr]^{2} </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"><math>\Rightarrow ~~~\rho_0</math></td> <td align="center"><math>=</math></td> <td align="left"> <math> \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{- 5 / 2} \biggl[ \frac{c_s^2}{K_e} \biggr]^{3 / 2} e^{\psi_i} \, . </math> </td> </tr> </table> This is identical to Eq. (3.1) of {{ Yabushita75 }} if we assume (as did {{ Yabushita75hereafter }}) that <math>\mu_e/\mu_c = 1</math>. Given that, following {{ Yabushita75hereafter }}, we have set <math>\rho_e = \rho_c</math>, the radius of the equilibrium configuration is given by the expression, <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>R^2</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>\biggl[ \frac{5K_e}{8\pi G} \biggr] \rho_e^{- 1 / 3} \eta_s^2</math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math> \frac{5K_e}{8\pi G} \biggl[\biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{- 5 / 2} \biggl( \frac{c_s^2}{K_e} \biggr)^{3 / 2} e^{\psi_i} \biggr]^{- 1 / 3} \eta_s^2 </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math> \frac{5K_e}{8\pi G} \biggl[\biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{5 / 6} \biggl( \frac{c_s^2}{K_e} \biggr)^{- 1 / 2} e^{- \psi_i/3} \biggr] \eta_s^2 \, ; </math> </td> </tr> </table> and the configuration's total mass is, <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>M_\mathrm{tot}</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>4\pi \biggl[ \frac{5K_e}{8\pi G} \biggr]^{3/2} \biggl[ \rho_e \biggr]^{1 / 2} \biggl(-\eta^2 \frac{d\theta}{d\eta} \biggr)_s</math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>4\pi \biggl[ \frac{5K_e}{8\pi G} \biggr]^{3/2} \biggl[ \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{- 5 / 2} \biggl( \frac{c_s^2}{K_e} \biggr)^{3 / 2} e^{\psi_i} \biggr]^{1 / 2} \biggl(-\eta^2 \frac{d\theta}{d\eta} \biggr)_s \, . </math> </td> </tr> </table> If we again set <math>\mu_e/\mu_c = 1</math>, this expression is identical to Eq. (3.2) of {{ Yabushita75 }}. The configuration's mean density is, <table border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>\bar\rho \equiv \frac{3M_\mathrm{tot}}{4\pi R^3} </math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>3\biggl[ \frac{5K_e}{8\pi G} \biggr]^{3/2} \biggl[ \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{- 5 / 2} \biggl( \frac{c_s^2}{K_e} \biggr)^{3 / 2} e^{\psi_i} \biggr]^{1 / 2} \biggl(-\eta^2 \frac{d\theta}{d\eta} \biggr)_s \biggl\{ \frac{5K_e}{8\pi G} \biggl[\biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{5 / 6} \biggl( \frac{c_s^2}{K_e} \biggr)^{- 1 / 2} e^{- \psi_i/3} \biggr] \eta_s^2 \biggr\}^{-3 / 2} </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>3 \biggl[ \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{- 5 / 4} \biggl( \frac{c_s^2}{K_e} \biggr)^{3 / 4} e^{+\psi_i / 2} \biggr] \biggl(-\frac{1}{\eta} \cdot \frac{d\theta}{d\eta} \biggr)_s \biggl[\biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{- 5 / 4} \biggl( \frac{c_s^2}{K_e} \biggr)^{3 / 4} e^{+ \psi_i/2} \biggr] </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>3 \biggl[ \biggl(\frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{- 5 / 2} \biggl( \frac{c_s^2}{K_e} \biggr)^{3 / 2} e^{+\psi_i } \biggr] \biggl(-\frac{1}{\eta} \cdot \frac{d\theta}{d\eta} \biggr)_s </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>\Rightarrow ~~~ \frac{\bar\rho}{\rho_0}</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>3 \biggl(-\frac{1}{\eta} \cdot \frac{d\theta}{d\eta} \biggr)_s \, . </math> </td> </tr> </table> =See Also= <ul> <li> [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974A%26A....32..309G/abstract M. Gabriel & M. L. Roth (1974, A&A, Vol. 32, p. 309)] … ''On the Secular Stability of Models with an Isothermal Core'' </li> <li>[https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1967AnAp...30..975G/abstract M. Gabriel & P. Ledoux (1967, Annales d'Astrophysique, Vol. 30, p. 975)] … ''Sur la Stabilité Séculaire des Modeéles a Noyaux Isothermes''<br /> <p> In § 1 (p. 442) of {{ Yabushita75 }} we find the following reference: <font color="darkgreen">"A somewhat similar problem has been investigated by [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1967AnAp...30..975G/abstract Gabriel & Ledoux (1967)]. Gaseous configurations with an isothermal core and polytropic envelope of index 3 were studied by {{ HC41 }} and by {{ SC42 }}. As is well known there is an upper limit (Schönberg-Chandrasekhar limit) to the mass of the core for the configurations to be in hydrostatic equilibria. Gabriel & Ledoux have investigated the stability of these configurations and have shown that secular stability is lost at the configuration that corresponds to the Schönberg-Chandrasekhar limit."</font> </li> </ul> {{ SGFfooter }}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to JETohlineWiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
JETohlineWiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Templates used on this page:
Template:HC41
(
edit
)
Template:Math/EQ SSLaneEmden02
(
edit
)
Template:SC42
(
edit
)
Template:SGFfooter
(
edit
)
Template:Yabushita75
(
edit
)
Template:Yabushita75full
(
edit
)
Template:Yabushita75hereafter
(
edit
)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Tiled Menu
Table of Contents
Old (VisTrails) Cover
Appendices
Variables & Parameters
Key Equations
Special Functions
Permissions
Formats
References
lsuPhys
Ramblings
Uploaded Images
Originals
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information